属实

评分: 7.0/10

Coalition
C0913

声明内容

“从一名代表东帝汶在国际法庭对澳大利亚提起诉讼的澳大利亚律师那里窃取了关键证据,该诉讼涉及我们对东帝汶石油协议进行的非法间谍活动。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

** * ** * 属实shǔ shí shǔ shí ** * ** * -- - 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 安全ān quán ān quán 情报组织qíng bào zǔ zhī qíng bào zǔ zhī (( ( ASIOASIO ASIO )) ) 确实què shí què shí 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 了le le 伯纳德bó nà dé bó nà dé ·· · 科莱kē lái kē lái 里lǐ lǐ (( ( BernardBernard Bernard CollaeryCollaery Collaery )) ) 的de de 办公室bàn gōng shì bàn gōng shì ,, , 他tā tā 是shì shì 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 东帝汶dōng dì wèn dōng dì wèn 对duì duì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 提起tí qǐ tí qǐ 国际guó jì guó jì 诉讼sù sòng sù sòng 的de de 律师lǜ shī lǜ shī ,, , 并bìng bìng 查获chá huò chá huò 了le le 与yǔ yǔ 该案gāi àn gāi àn 有关yǒu guān yǒu guān 的de de 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 和hé hé 电子diàn zi diàn zi 资料zī liào zī liào [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
**TRUE** - ASIO did raid the office of Bernard Collaery, the lawyer representing East Timor in an international case against Australia, and seized documents and electronic files related to the case [1][2].
20132013 2013 年nián nián 1212 12 月yuè yuè 33 3 日rì rì ,, , ASIOASIO ASIO 特工tè gōng tè gōng 在zài zài 澳大利亚联邦ào dà lì yà lián bāng ào dà lì yà lián bāng 警察jǐng chá jǐng chá 的de de 陪同péi tóng péi tóng 下xià xià 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 了le le 科莱kē lái kē lái 里lǐ lǐ 位于wèi yú wèi yú 堪培拉kān péi lā kān péi lā 的de de 律师lǜ shī lǜ shī 事务所shì wù suǒ shì wù suǒ ,, , 并bìng bìng 查获chá huò chá huò 了le le 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 和hé hé 电子diàn zi diàn zi 数据shù jù shù jù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
On December 3, 2013, ASIO agents, accompanied by Australian Federal Police, raided Collaery's Canberra law office and seized documents and electronic data [1].
此次cǐ cì cǐ cì 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 发生fā shēng fā shēng 在zài zài 海牙hǎi yá hǎi yá 常设cháng shè cháng shè 仲裁zhòng cái zhòng cái 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 即将jí jiāng jí jiāng 开庭审理kāi tíng shěn lǐ kāi tíng shěn lǐ 东帝汶dōng dì wèn dōng dì wèn 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn 《《 《 帝汶海dì wèn hǎi dì wèn hǎi 特定tè dìng tè dìng 海上hǎi shàng hǎi shàng 安排ān pái ān pái 条约tiáo yuē tiáo yuē 》》 》 (( ( CMATSCMATS CMATS )) ) 前qián qián 几天jǐ tiān jǐ tiān [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The raid occurred just days before hearings were scheduled to begin at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, where East Timor was challenging the Certain Maritime Arrangements in the Timor Sea (CMATS) treaty [1][2].
被查获bèi chá huò bèi chá huò 的de de 材料cái liào cái liào 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò :: :
The seized material included: - Legal documents related to the Timor Sea Treaty negotiations [3] - Electronic files containing evidence of Australia's alleged spying [1] - A statement by a former ASIS agent (known as "Witness K") alleging Australia bugged East Timor's cabinet room during 2004 treaty negotiations [3][4] Attorney-General George Brandis confirmed he authorized the search warrants, stating they were issued "on the grounds that the documents contained intelligence related to security matters" [1].
-- - 与yǔ yǔ 帝汶海dì wèn hǎi dì wèn hǎi 条约tiáo yuē tiáo yuē 谈判tán pàn tán pàn 有关yǒu guān yǒu guān 的de de 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
In March 2014, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ordered Australia to seal all documents and data seized in the raid and not to access them, marking the first time the court had imposed restrictions on the spy agencies of a Five Eyes state [3][5].
-- - 包含bāo hán bāo hán 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 涉嫌shè xián shè xián 间谍活动jiàn dié huó dòng jiàn dié huó dòng 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 的de de 电子diàn zi diàn zi 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
Australia subsequently admitted before the ICJ that it intended to object to Witness K giving evidence at the arbitral tribunal, fearing the former agent "would make further disclosures that Australia could not confine" [6].
-- - 一名yī míng yī míng 前qián qián 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 秘密mì mì mì mì 情报局qíng bào jú qíng bào jú (( ( ASISASIS ASIS )) ) 特工tè gōng tè gōng (( ( 被bèi bèi 称为chēng wéi chēng wéi "" " 证人zhèng rén zhèng rén KK K "" " )) ) 的de de 证词zhèng cí zhèng cí ,, , 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 在zài zài 20042004 2004 年nián nián 条约tiáo yuē tiáo yuē 谈判tán pàn tán pàn 期间qī jiān qī jiān 对duì duì 东帝汶dōng dì wèn dōng dì wèn 的de de 内阁nèi gé nèi gé 会议室huì yì shì huì yì shì 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 了le le 窃听qiè tīng qiè tīng [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] [[ [ 44 4 ]] ]
总zǒng zǒng 检察长jiǎn chá zhǎng jiǎn chá zhǎng 乔治qiáo zhì qiáo zhì ·· · 布兰迪斯bù lán dí sī bù lán dí sī (( ( GeorgeGeorge George BrandisBrandis Brandis )) ) 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí 他tā tā 授权shòu quán shòu quán 了le le 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng ,, , 称chēng chēng 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令是lìng shì lìng shì "" " 基于jī yú jī yú 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 包含bāo hán bāo hán 与yǔ yǔ 安全ān quán ān quán 问题wèn tí wèn tí 相关xiāng guān xiāng guān 的de de 情报qíng bào qíng bào "" " 而ér ér 签发qiān fā qiān fā 的de de [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
20142014 2014 年nián nián 33 3 月yuè yuè ,, , 国际法院guó jì fǎ yuàn guó jì fǎ yuàn (( ( ICJICJ ICJ )) ) 下令xià lìng xià lìng 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 封存fēng cún fēng cún 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 中zhōng zhōng 查获chá huò chá huò 的de de 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 和hé hé 数据shù jù shù jù ,, , 不得bù dé bù dé 查阅chá yuè chá yuè ,, , 这zhè zhè 是shì shì 该gāi gāi 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 首次shǒu cì shǒu cì 对duì duì 五眼wǔ yǎn wǔ yǎn 联盟lián méng lián méng 国家guó jiā guó jiā 的de de 间谍jiàn dié jiàn dié 机构jī gòu jī gòu 实施shí shī shí shī 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 随后suí hòu suí hòu 在zài zài 国际法院guó jì fǎ yuàn guó jì fǎ yuàn 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn ,, , 它tā tā 打算dǎ suàn dǎ suàn 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 证人zhèng rén zhèng rén KK K 在zài zài 仲裁zhòng cái zhòng cái 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 作证zuò zhèng zuò zhèng ,, , 担心dān xīn dān xīn 这名zhè míng zhè míng 前qián qián 特工tè gōng tè gōng "" " 会huì huì 做出zuò chū zuò chū 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 无法wú fǎ wú fǎ 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 的de de 进一步jìn yí bù jìn yí bù 披露pī lù pī lù "" " [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。

缺失背景

** * ** * 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 事实shì shí shì shí :: : ** * ** *
**The claim omits several critical facts:** 1. **The spying itself occurred in 2004 under the Howard government** - The alleged bugging of East Timor's cabinet offices during treaty negotiations occurred in 2004 under the Coalition's John Howard, not during the Abbott government when the ASIO raid occurred [2][4]. 2. **The raid's stated justification** - The government claimed the raid was necessary to protect national security and prevent the exposure of Australian intelligence officers and tradecraft [6].
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 间谍活动jiàn dié huó dòng jiàn dié huó dòng 本身běn shēn běn shēn 发生fā shēng fā shēng 在zài zài 20042004 2004 年nián nián 的de de 霍华德huò huá dé huò huá dé (( ( HowardHoward Howard )) ) 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 时期shí qī shí qī ** * ** * -- - 据称jù chēng jù chēng 在zài zài 条约tiáo yuē tiáo yuē 谈判tán pàn tán pàn 期间qī jiān qī jiān 对duì duì 东帝汶dōng dì wèn dōng dì wèn 内阁nèi gé nèi gé 办公室bàn gōng shì bàn gōng shì 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 的de de 窃听qiè tīng qiè tīng 发生fā shēng fā shēng 在zài zài 20042004 2004 年nián nián ,, , 发生fā shēng fā shēng 在zài zài CoalitionCoalition Coalition 的de de 约翰yuē hàn yuē hàn ·· · 霍华德huò huá dé huò huá dé (( ( JohnJohn John HowardHoward Howard )) ) 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 期间qī jiān qī jiān ,, , 而ér ér 不是bú shì bú shì 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 发生fā shēng fā shēng 的de de 阿博特ā bó tè ā bó tè (( ( AbbottAbbott Abbott )) ) 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 时期shí qī shí qī [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
Solicitor-General Justin Gleeson defended the action citing risks to "endanger" spies and expose technical capabilities [6]. 3. **Witness K's passport was cancelled** - The former ASIS agent had his passport cancelled, preventing him from traveling to The Hague to give oral evidence [6]. 4. **Australia and East Timor eventually reached a new treaty** - In 2018, Australia and East Timor signed a new maritime boundary treaty that was more favorable to East Timor [2]. 5. **The prosecutions were eventually dropped** - In July 2022, Labor Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus withdrew support for the prosecution of Collaery, ending a nearly decade-long legal saga [4][7]. 6. **Legal privilege was breached** - The raid seized material subject to lawyer-client privilege, an unprecedented action that drew condemnation from legal experts [2][8].
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 的de de statedstated stated 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu ** * ** * -- - 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 是shì shì 为了wèi le wèi le 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 国家guó jiā guó jiā 安全ān quán ān quán 和hé hé 防止fáng zhǐ fáng zhǐ 暴露bào lù bào lù 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 情报人员qíng bào rén yuán qíng bào rén yuán 及其jí qí jí qí 技术手段jì shù shǒu duàn jì shù shǒu duàn 的de de 必要措施bì yào cuò shī bì yào cuò shī [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
司法部长sī fǎ bù zhǎng sī fǎ bù zhǎng 贾jiǎ jiǎ 斯汀sī tīng sī tīng ·· · 格里森gé lǐ sēn gé lǐ sēn (( ( JustinJustin Justin GleesonGleeson Gleeson )) ) 为wèi wèi 这zhè zhè 一yī yī 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 辩护biàn hù biàn hù ,, , 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 是shì shì 存在cún zài cún zài "" " 危及wēi jí wēi jí "" " 间谍jiàn dié jiàn dié 和hé hé 暴露bào lù bào lù 技术jì shù jì shù 能力néng lì néng lì 的de de 风险fēng xiǎn fēng xiǎn [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 证人zhèng rén zhèng rén KK K 的de de 护照hù zhào hù zhào 被bèi bèi 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo ** * ** * -- - 这名zhè míng zhè míng 前qián qián ASISASIS ASIS 特工tè gōng tè gōng 的de de 护照hù zhào hù zhào 被bèi bèi 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo ,, , 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ 他tā tā 前往qián wǎng qián wǎng 海牙hǎi yá hǎi yá 提供tí gōng tí gōng 口头kǒu tóu kǒu tóu 证词zhèng cí zhèng cí [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
44 4 .. . ** * ** * 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 和hé hé 东帝汶dōng dì wèn dōng dì wèn 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 达成dá chéng dá chéng 了le le 新xīn xīn 条约tiáo yuē tiáo yuē ** * ** * -- - 20182018 2018 年nián nián ,, , 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 和hé hé 东帝汶dōng dì wèn dōng dì wèn 签署qiān shǔ qiān shǔ 了le le 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng 新xīn xīn 的de de 海上hǎi shàng hǎi shàng 边界biān jiè biān jiè 条约tiáo yuē tiáo yuē ,, , 该gāi gāi 条约tiáo yuē tiáo yuē 对duì duì 东帝汶dōng dì wèn dōng dì wèn 更为gèng wéi gèng wéi 有利yǒu lì yǒu lì [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
55 5 .. . ** * ** * 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 被bèi bèi 撤销chè xiāo chè xiāo ** * ** * -- - 20222022 2022 年nián nián 77 7 月yuè yuè ,, , LaborLabor Labor 的de de 总zǒng zǒng 检察长jiǎn chá zhǎng jiǎn chá zhǎng 马克mǎ kè mǎ kè ·· · 德dé dé 雷福斯léi fú sī léi fú sī (( ( MarkMark Mark DreyfusDreyfus Dreyfus )) ) 撤回chè huí chè huí 对duì duì 科莱kē lái kē lái 里lǐ lǐ 的de de 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù 支持zhī chí zhī chí ,, , 结束jié shù jié shù 了le le 长达zhǎng dá zhǎng dá 近十年jìn shí nián jìn shí nián 的de de 法律纠纷fǎ lǜ jiū fēn fǎ lǜ jiū fēn [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。 。
66 6 .. . ** * ** * 律师lǜ shī lǜ shī 特权tè quán tè quán 被bèi bèi 侵犯qīn fàn qīn fàn ** * ** * -- - 此次cǐ cì cǐ cì 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 查获chá huò chá huò 了le le 受shòu shòu 律师lǜ shī lǜ shī -- - 客户kè hù kè hù 特权tè quán tè quán 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 的de de 材料cái liào cái liào ,, , 这是zhè shì zhè shì 一种yī zhǒng yī zhǒng 前所未有qián suǒ wèi yǒu qián suǒ wèi yǒu 的de de 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng ,, , 遭到zāo dào zāo dào 了le le 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 的de de 谴责qiǎn zé qiǎn zé [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。 。

来源可信度评估

原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán 《《 《 TheThe The AgeAge Age 》》 》 (( ( 费尔法克斯fèi ěr fǎ kè sī fèi ěr fǎ kè sī 传媒chuán méi chuán méi )) ) 是shì shì 一家yī jiā yī jiā 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 、、 、 声誉shēng yù shēng yù 良好liáng hǎo liáng hǎo 的de de 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 报纸bào zhǐ bào zhǐ ,, , 持chí chí 中间zhōng jiān zhōng jiān 偏左piān zuǒ piān zuǒ 的de de 编辑biān jí biān jí 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 。。 。
The original source, *The Age* (Fairfax Media), is a mainstream, reputable Australian newspaper with a center-left editorial stance.
它tā tā 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 被bèi bèi 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 在zài zài 事实shì shí shì shí 报道bào dào bào dào 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 是shì shì 可靠kě kào kě kào 的de de [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
It is generally regarded as reliable for factual reporting [6].
查阅chá yuè chá yuè 的de de 其他qí tā qí tā 来源lái yuán lái yuán (( ( ABCABC ABC 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 、、 、 BBCBBC BBC 、、 、 《《 《 悉尼xī ní xī ní 先驱xiān qū xiān qū 晨报chén bào chén bào 》》 》 、、 、 维基百科wéi jī bǎi kē wéi jī bǎi kē 和hé hé 国际法院guó jì fǎ yuàn guó jì fǎ yuàn 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn )) ) 均jūn jūn 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 权威性quán wēi xìng quán wēi xìng ,, , 对duì duì 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn 提供tí gōng tí gōng 了le le 始终如一shǐ zhōng rú yī shǐ zhōng rú yī 的de de 事实shì shí shì shí 叙述xù shù xù shù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
Additional sources consulted (ABC News, BBC, The Sydney Morning Herald, Wikipedia, and ICJ documents) are authoritative and provide consistent factual accounts of the events [1][2][3][4][5].
报道bào dào bào dào 得到dé dào dé dào 了le le 以下yǐ xià yǐ xià 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí :: :
The reporting is corroborated by: - Attorney-General George Brandis's own statement confirming the raid [1] - ICJ official case documentation [5] - Multiple mainstream media outlets across the political spectrum
-- - 总zǒng zǒng 检察长jiǎn chá zhǎng jiǎn chá zhǎng 乔治qiáo zhì qiáo zhì ·· · 布兰迪斯bù lán dí sī bù lán dí sī (( ( GeorgeGeorge George BrandisBrandis Brandis )) ) 本人běn rén běn rén 确认què rèn què rèn 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 的de de 声明shēng míng shēng míng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
-- - 国际法院guó jì fǎ yuàn guó jì fǎ yuàn 官方guān fāng guān fāng 案件àn jiàn àn jiàn 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
-- - 跨越kuà yuè kuà yuè 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 光谱guāng pǔ guāng pǔ 的de de 多家duō jiā duō jiā 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] [[ [ 44 4 ]] ]
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做过zuò guò zuò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng ?? ?
**Did Labor do something similar?** Search conducted: "Labor government ASIO intelligence operations spying foreign countries" Finding: **Partial equivalent with important distinctions:** 1. **The original spying operation occurred under Coalition government (2004)** - The alleged bugging of East Timor's cabinet occurred under the Howard government (Coalition), not Labor [2][4]. 2. **Labor was aware but took no action** - East Timor first raised the spying allegations with then-Prime Minister Julia Gillard (Labor) in late 2012, but no action was taken [6].
** * ** *
The Labor government maintained the position that the 2004 operation was a legitimate intelligence activity. 3. **Labor eventually dropped the prosecutions** - In July 2022, the Albanese Labor government dropped the prosecution of Bernard Collaery through Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus, acknowledging it was not in the public interest to continue [4][7]. 4. **Labor shelved inquiry promise** - Despite pre-election promises to hold an inquiry into the ASIS operation and subsequent prosecution, the Labor government shelved this commitment in 2023 [4]. 5. **Broader context on intelligence operations** - Australian intelligence agencies have conducted foreign spying operations under governments of both parties.
搜索sōu suǒ sōu suǒ :: : "" " LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ ASIOASIO ASIO 情报qíng bào qíng bào 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 间谍jiàn dié jiàn dié 外国wài guó wài guó "" "
The 2004 East Timor operation was unusual primarily in that it allegedly targeted a friendly nation for commercial advantage rather than national security purposes [2][8]. **Comparison:** While the raid itself occurred under a Coalition government, the broader pattern of protecting intelligence operations and resisting transparency has been consistent across both major parties.
发现fā xiàn fā xiàn :: : ** * ** * 部分bù fèn bù fèn 类似lèi sì lèi sì ,, , 但dàn dàn 有yǒu yǒu 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 区别qū bié qū bié :: : ** * ** *
The key distinction is that Labor ultimately discontinued the prosecutions that the Coalition had initiated.
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 间谍jiàn dié jiàn dié 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 发生fā shēng fā shēng 在zài zài CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 时期shí qī shí qī (( ( 20042004 2004 年nián nián )) ) ** * ** * -- - 据称jù chēng jù chēng 对duì duì 东帝汶dōng dì wèn dōng dì wèn 内阁nèi gé nèi gé 的de de 窃听qiè tīng qiè tīng 发生fā shēng fā shēng 在zài zài 霍华德huò huá dé huò huá dé (( ( HowardHoward Howard )) ) 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ (( ( CoalitionCoalition Coalition )) ) 时期shí qī shí qī ,, , 而ér ér 不是bú shì bú shì LaborLabor Labor 时期shí qī shí qī [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
22 2 .. . ** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 知情zhī qíng zhī qíng 但dàn dàn 未wèi wèi 采取行动cǎi qǔ xíng dòng cǎi qǔ xíng dòng ** * ** * -- - 东帝汶dōng dì wèn dōng dì wèn 于yú yú 20122012 2012 年底nián dǐ nián dǐ 首次shǒu cì shǒu cì 向xiàng xiàng 时任shí rèn shí rèn 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ 朱zhū zhū 莉娅lì yà lì yà ·· · 吉拉德jí lā dé jí lā dé (( ( JuliaJulia Julia GillardGillard Gillard ,, , LaborLabor Labor )) ) 提出tí chū tí chū 间谍jiàn dié jiàn dié 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng ,, , 但dàn dàn 未wèi wèi 采取任何cǎi qǔ rèn hé cǎi qǔ rèn hé 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 坚持jiān chí jiān chí 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 20042004 2004 年nián nián 的de de 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 是shì shì 合法hé fǎ hé fǎ 的de de 情报活动qíng bào huó dòng qíng bào huó dòng 。。 。
33 3 .. . ** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 撤销chè xiāo chè xiāo 了le le 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù ** * ** * -- - 20222022 2022 年nián nián 77 7 月yuè yuè ,, , 阿尔巴尼ā ěr bā ní ā ěr bā ní 斯sī sī (( ( AlbaneseAlbanese Albanese )) ) LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 通过tōng guò tōng guò 总zǒng zǒng 检察长jiǎn chá zhǎng jiǎn chá zhǎng 马克mǎ kè mǎ kè ·· · 德dé dé 雷福斯léi fú sī léi fú sī (( ( MarkMark Mark DreyfusDreyfus Dreyfus )) ) 撤销chè xiāo chè xiāo 了le le 对duì duì 伯纳德bó nà dé bó nà dé ·· · 科莱kē lái kē lái 里lǐ lǐ 的de de 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù ,, , 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn 继续jì xù jì xù 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù 不bù bù 符合fú hé fú hé 公共利益gōng gòng lì yì gōng gòng lì yì [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。 。
44 4 .. . ** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 搁置gē zhì gē zhì 了le le 调查diào chá diào chá 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò ** * ** * -- - 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn LaborLabor Labor 在zài zài 选举xuǎn jǔ xuǎn jǔ 前qián qián 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 对duì duì ASISASIS ASIS 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 及jí jí 随后suí hòu suí hòu 的de de 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 调查diào chá diào chá ,, , 但dàn dàn 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 20232023 2023 年nián nián 搁置gē zhì gē zhì 了le le 这zhè zhè 一yī yī 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
55 5 .. . ** * ** * 情报qíng bào qíng bào 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 的de de 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ** * ** * -- - 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 情报机构qíng bào jī gòu qíng bào jī gòu 在zài zài 两liǎng liǎng 党执政dǎng zhí zhèng dǎng zhí zhèng 期间qī jiān qī jiān 都dōu dōu 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 过guò guò 对外duì wài duì wài 间谍jiàn dié jiàn dié 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 。。 。
20042004 2004 年nián nián 的de de 东帝汶dōng dì wèn dōng dì wèn 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 之所以zhī suǒ yǐ zhī suǒ yǐ 不bù bù 寻常xún cháng xún cháng ,, , 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 是因为shì yīn wèi shì yīn wèi 它tā tā 据称jù chēng jù chēng 是shì shì 为了wèi le wèi le 商业利益shāng yè lì yì shāng yè lì yì 而ér ér 不是bú shì bú shì 国家guó jiā guó jiā 安全ān quán ān quán 目的mù dì mù dì 而ér ér 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 一个yí gè yí gè 友好yǒu hǎo yǒu hǎo 国家guó jiā guó jiā [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào :: : ** * ** * 虽然suī rán suī rán 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 本身běn shēn běn shēn 发生fā shēng fā shēng 在zài zài CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 时期shí qī shí qī ,, , 但dàn dàn 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 情报qíng bào qíng bào 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 和hé hé 抵制dǐ zhì dǐ zhì 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 的de de 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 模式mó shì mó shì 在zài zài 两大liǎng dà liǎng dà 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 中zhōng zhōng 都dōu dōu 是shì shì 一致yí zhì yí zhì 的de de 。。 。
关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 区别qū bié qū bié 在于zài yú zài yú LaborLabor Labor 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 停止tíng zhǐ tíng zhǐ 了le le CoalitionCoalition Coalition 发起fā qǐ fā qǐ 的de de 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

此案cǐ àn cǐ àn 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 了le le 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ 上shàng shàng 最具zuì jù zuì jù 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì 的de de 情报qíng bào qíng bào 相关xiāng guān xiāng guān 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn 之一zhī yī zhī yī ,, , 涉及shè jí shè jí 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng 为wèi wèi 商业利益shāng yè lì yì shāng yè lì yì 而ér ér 不当bù dàng bù dàng 窃听qiè tīng qiè tīng 友好yǒu hǎo yǒu hǎo 邻国lín guó lín guó ,, , 随后suí hòu suí hòu 采取cǎi qǔ cǎi qǔ 的de de 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 似乎sì hū sì hū 旨在zhǐ zài zhǐ zài 防止fáng zhǐ fáng zhǐ 披露pī lù pī lù 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 活动huó dòng huó dòng 。。 。
This case represents one of the most controversial intelligence-related episodes in Australian history, involving allegations of improper spying on a friendly neighbor for commercial advantage, followed by actions that appeared designed to prevent disclosure of those activities. **Criticisms of the government's actions:** 1. **Timing of the raid** - The December 2013 raid occurred just two days before The Hague proceedings were to begin, leading to accusations it was designed to disrupt East Timor's case [6].
** * ** * 对duì duì 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 的de de 批评pī píng pī píng :: : ** * ** *
Bernard Collaery described it as a "blatant, disgraceful attempt to impede justice" [1]. 2. **Commercial motivation** - The alleged 2004 bugging appeared motivated by securing favorable terms in oil and gas treaty negotiations worth an estimated $40 billion, rather than genuine national security concerns [2][8]. 3. **Breach of legal privilege** - Raiding a lawyer's office and seizing client materials is extraordinarily rare and undermines the legal profession's ability to represent clients effectively [2][8]. 4. **Secrecy overreach** - The subsequent prosecution of Collaery and Witness K under the National Security Information Act, with attempts to hold secret trials, was criticized by legal experts as damaging to open justice [4][8]. 5. **Political prosecution concerns** - The delay between the 2013 raid and 2018 charges, coinciding with a change in Attorney-General from George Brandis to Christian Porter, raised questions about political motivation [4]. **Government's stated justifications:** 1. **National security** - The government maintained the raid was necessary to protect classified information and prevent exposure of intelligence officers and methods [6]. 2. **Legal basis** - Attorney-General Brandis stated the warrants were properly issued on national security grounds and instructed ASIO that the seized material should not be communicated to those conducting Australia's defense at The Hague [1]. 3. **Preventing further disclosures** - The government feared Witness K would make "further disclosures that Australia could not confine" [6]. 4. **Rule of law** - Supporters of the prosecution argued that disclosing classified information is a serious offense, regardless of the whistleblower's motives. **Expert assessments:** Senior Australian legal figures, including barrister Geoffrey Watson SC and constitutional law expert Rebecca Ananian-Welsh, described the prosecution as inappropriate and damaging to public confidence in justice [2][8].
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 的de de 时机shí jī shí jī ** * ** * -- - 20132013 2013 年nián nián 1212 12 月yuè yuè 的de de 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 发生fā shēng fā shēng 在zài zài 海牙hǎi yá hǎi yá 诉讼sù sòng sù sòng 开始kāi shǐ kāi shǐ 前两天qián liǎng tiān qián liǎng tiān ,, , 导致dǎo zhì dǎo zhì 有人yǒu rén yǒu rén 指责zhǐ zé zhǐ zé 这是zhè shì zhè shì 为了wèi le wèi le 破坏pò huài pò huài 东帝汶dōng dì wèn dōng dì wèn 的de de 案子àn zi àn zi [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
The ACT Court of Appeal ultimately ruled that the open hearing of criminal trials was important because it "deterred political prosecutions" and allowed public scrutiny [4]. **Key context:** This episode is **not typical** of Australia-East Timor relations, which have generally been close since Australia led the INTERFET intervention in 1999.
伯纳德bó nà dé bó nà dé ·· · 科莱kē lái kē lái 里lǐ lǐ 将jiāng jiāng 其qí qí 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为wèi wèi "" " 对duì duì 正义zhèng yì zhèng yì 的de de 公然gōng rán gōng rán 、、 、 可耻kě chǐ kě chǐ 的de de 企图qǐ tú qǐ tú 阻挠zǔ náo zǔ náo "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The case highlighted tensions between national security, commercial interests, and international law - with the ICJ's intervention suggesting Australia's actions crossed international legal boundaries [3][5].
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 商业shāng yè shāng yè 动机dòng jī dòng jī ** * ** * -- - 据称jù chēng jù chēng 20042004 2004 年nián nián 的de de 窃听qiè tīng qiè tīng 似乎sì hū sì hū 是shì shì 为了wèi le wèi le 在zài zài 价值jià zhí jià zhí 约yuē yuē 400400 400 亿美元yì měi yuán yì měi yuán 的de de 石油shí yóu shí yóu 和hé hé 天然气tiān rán qì tiān rán qì 条约tiáo yuē tiáo yuē 谈判tán pàn tán pàn 中zhōng zhōng 获得huò dé huò dé 有利yǒu lì yǒu lì 条款tiáo kuǎn tiáo kuǎn ,, , 而ér ér 不是bú shì bú shì 出于chū yú chū yú 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 的de de 国家guó jiā guó jiā 安全ān quán ān quán 考虑kǎo lǜ kǎo lǜ [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。 。
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 侵犯qīn fàn qīn fàn 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 特权tè quán tè quán ** * ** * -- - 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 律师lǜ shī lǜ shī 事务所shì wù suǒ shì wù suǒ 并bìng bìng 查获chá huò chá huò 客户kè hù kè hù 材料cái liào cái liào 是shì shì 极为jí wéi jí wéi 罕见hǎn jiàn hǎn jiàn 的de de ,, , 破坏pò huài pò huài 了le le 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 职业zhí yè zhí yè 有效yǒu xiào yǒu xiào 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 客户kè hù kè hù 的de de 能力néng lì néng lì [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。 。
44 4 .. . ** * ** * 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì 过度guò dù guò dù ** * ** * -- - 随后suí hòu suí hòu 根据gēn jù gēn jù 《《 《 国家guó jiā guó jiā 安全ān quán ān quán 信息xìn xī xìn xī 法fǎ fǎ 》》 》 对duì duì 科莱kē lái kē lái 里lǐ lǐ 和hé hé 证人zhèng rén zhèng rén KK K 的de de 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù ,, , 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 试图shì tú shì tú 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 秘密mì mì mì mì 审判shěn pàn shěn pàn 的de de 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ ,, , 被bèi bèi 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 批评pī píng pī píng 为wèi wèi 损害sǔn hài sǔn hài 了le le 公开审判gōng kāi shěn pàn gōng kāi shěn pàn [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。 。
55 5 .. . ** * ** * 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù 的de de 担忧dān yōu dān yōu ** * ** * -- - 从cóng cóng 20132013 2013 年nián nián 的de de 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 到dào dào 20182018 2018 年nián nián 提出tí chū tí chū 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng 之间zhī jiān zhī jiān 的de de 延迟yán chí yán chí ,, , 恰好qià hǎo qià hǎo 与yǔ yǔ 总zǒng zǒng 检察长jiǎn chá zhǎng jiǎn chá zhǎng 从cóng cóng 乔治qiáo zhì qiáo zhì ·· · 布兰迪斯bù lán dí sī bù lán dí sī (( ( GeorgeGeorge George BrandisBrandis Brandis )) ) 更换gēng huàn gēng huàn 为wèi wèi 克里斯蒂安kè lǐ sī dì ān kè lǐ sī dì ān ·· · 波特bō tè bō tè (( ( ChristianChristian Christian PorterPorter Porter )) ) 的de de 时间shí jiān shí jiān 重合chóng hé chóng hé ,, , 引发yǐn fā yǐn fā 了le le 关于guān yú guān yú 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 动机dòng jī dòng jī 的de de 质疑zhì yí zhì yí [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de statedstated stated 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu :: : ** * ** *
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 国家guó jiā guó jiā 安全ān quán ān quán ** * ** * -- - 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 坚称jiān chēng jiān chēng 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 是shì shì 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 机密信息jī mì xìn xī jī mì xìn xī 和hé hé 防止fáng zhǐ fáng zhǐ 暴露bào lù bào lù 情报人员qíng bào rén yuán qíng bào rén yuán 及jí jí 方法fāng fǎ fāng fǎ 的de de 必要措施bì yào cuò shī bì yào cuò shī [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 法律依据fǎ lǜ yī jù fǎ lǜ yī jù ** * ** * -- - 总zǒng zǒng 检察长jiǎn chá zhǎng jiǎn chá zhǎng 布兰迪斯bù lán dí sī bù lán dí sī 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì ,, , 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令是lìng shì lìng shì 基于jī yú jī yú 国家guó jiā guó jiā 安全ān quán ān quán 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 适当shì dàng shì dàng 签发qiān fā qiān fā 的de de ,, , 并bìng bìng 指示zhǐ shì zhǐ shì ASIOASIO ASIO 不得bù dé bù dé 将jiāng jiāng 查获chá huò chá huò 的de de 材料cái liào cái liào 传达chuán dá chuán dá 给gěi gěi 在zài zài 海牙hǎi yá hǎi yá 为wèi wèi 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 辩护biàn hù biàn hù 的de de 人员rén yuán rén yuán [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 防止fáng zhǐ fáng zhǐ 进一步jìn yí bù jìn yí bù 披露pī lù pī lù ** * ** * -- - 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 担心dān xīn dān xīn 证人zhèng rén zhèng rén KK K 会huì huì 做出zuò chū zuò chū "" " 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 无法wú fǎ wú fǎ 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 的de de 进一步jìn yí bù jìn yí bù 披露pī lù pī lù "" " [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
44 4 .. . ** * ** * 法治fǎ zhì fǎ zhì ** * ** * -- - 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù 的de de 支持者zhī chí zhě zhī chí zhě 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi ,, , 无论wú lùn wú lùn 举报者jǔ bào zhě jǔ bào zhě 的de de 动机dòng jī dòng jī 如何rú hé rú hé ,, , 披露pī lù pī lù 机密信息jī mì xìn xī jī mì xìn xī 都dōu dōu 是shì shì 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 的de de 违法行为wéi fǎ xíng wéi wéi fǎ xíng wéi 。。 。
** * ** * 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 评估píng gū píng gū :: : ** * ** *
澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 资深zī shēn zī shēn 法律界fǎ lǜ jiè fǎ lǜ jiè 人士rén shì rén shì ,, , 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 大dà dà 律师lǜ shī lǜ shī 杰弗里jié fú lǐ jié fú lǐ ·· · 沃森wò sēn wò sēn SCSC SC (( ( GeoffreyGeoffrey Geoffrey WatsonWatson Watson SCSC SC )) ) 和hé hé 宪法xiàn fǎ xiàn fǎ 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 丽贝卡lì bèi kǎ lì bèi kǎ ·· · 阿纳尼安ā nà ní ān ā nà ní ān -- - 韦尔什wéi ěr shén wéi ěr shén (( ( RebeccaRebecca Rebecca AnanianAnanian Ananian -- - WelshWelsh Welsh )) ) ,, , 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 此次cǐ cì cǐ cì 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù 不当bù dàng bù dàng ,, , 损害sǔn hài sǔn hài 了le le 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng 对duì duì 司法sī fǎ sī fǎ 的de de 信心xìn xīn xìn xīn [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。 。
澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 首都shǒu dū shǒu dū 特区tè qū tè qū 上诉shàng sù shàng sù 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 裁定cái dìng cái dìng ,, , 刑事xíng shì xíng shì 审判shěn pàn shěn pàn 的de de 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 听证tīng zhèng tīng zhèng 非常fēi cháng fēi cháng 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào ,, , 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi 它tā tā "" " 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù "" " 并bìng bìng 允许yǔn xǔ yǔn xǔ 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng 监督jiān dū jiān dū [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng :: : ** * ** * 这一zhè yī zhè yī 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn ** * ** * 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi ** * ** * 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà -- - 东帝汶dōng dì wèn dōng dì wèn 关系guān xì guān xì 的de de 典型diǎn xíng diǎn xíng 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo ,, , 自zì zì 19991999 1999 年nián nián 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 领导lǐng dǎo lǐng dǎo 东帝汶dōng dì wèn dōng dì wèn 国际guó jì guó jì 部队bù duì bù duì (( ( INTERFETINTERFET INTERFET )) ) 干预gān yù gān yù 以来yǐ lái yǐ lái ,, , 两国关系liǎng guó guān xì liǎng guó guān xì 总体zǒng tǐ zǒng tǐ 密切mì qiè mì qiè 。。 。
此案cǐ àn cǐ àn 凸显tū xiǎn tū xiǎn 了le le 国家guó jiā guó jiā 安全ān quán ān quán 、、 、 商业利益shāng yè lì yì shāng yè lì yì 和hé hé 国际法guó jì fǎ guó jì fǎ 之间zhī jiān zhī jiān 的de de 紧张jǐn zhāng jǐn zhāng 关系guān xì guān xì —— — —— — 国际法院guó jì fǎ yuàn guó jì fǎ yuàn 的de de 干预gān yù gān yù 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 的de de 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 跨越kuà yuè kuà yuè 了le le 国际guó jì guó jì 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 边界biān jiè biān jiè [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。

属实

7.0

/ 10

核心hé xīn hé xīn 事实shì shí shì shí 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 是shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de 。。 。
The core factual claim is accurate.
ASIOASIO ASIO 确实què shí què shí 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 了le le 伯纳德bó nà dé bó nà dé ·· · 科莱kē lái kē lái 里lǐ lǐ 的de de 办公室bàn gōng shì bàn gōng shì ,, , 并bìng bìng 查获chá huò chá huò 了le le 与yǔ yǔ 东帝汶dōng dì wèn dōng dì wèn 对duì duì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 的de de 国际guó jì guó jì 诉讼sù sòng sù sòng 有关yǒu guān yǒu guān 的de de 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 和hé hé 电子diàn zi diàn zi 资料zī liào zī liào 。。 。
ASIO did raid Bernard Collaery's office and seize documents and electronic files related to East Timor's international case against Australia.
国际法院guó jì fǎ yuàn guó jì fǎ yuàn 随后suí hòu suí hòu 下令xià lìng xià lìng 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 封存fēng cún fēng cún 查获chá huò chá huò 的de de 材料cái liào cái liào ,, , 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 也yě yě 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn 它tā tā 试图shì tú shì tú 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 证人zhèng rén zhèng rén 作证zuò zhèng zuò zhèng 。。 。
The ICJ subsequently ordered Australia to seal the seized material, and Australia admitted it sought to prevent the key witness from giving evidence.
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 将jiāng jiāng 其qí qí 定性dìng xìng dìng xìng 为wèi wèi "" " 盗窃dào qiè dào qiè "" " 在技术上zài jì shù shàng zài jì shù shàng 不够bù gòu bù gòu 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què —— — —— — 此次cǐ cì cǐ cì 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 是shì shì 在zài zài 总zǒng zǒng 检察长jiǎn chá zhǎng jiǎn chá zhǎng 授权shòu quán shòu quán 的de de 合法hé fǎ hé fǎ 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令下lìng xià lìng xià 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 的de de ,, , 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 国际法院guó jì fǎ yuàn guó jì fǎ yuàn 后来hòu lái hòu lái 在zài zài 某种意义mǒu zhǒng yì yì mǒu zhǒng yì yì 上shàng shàng 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng 在zài zài 国际背景guó jì bèi jǐng guó jì bèi jǐng 下xià xià 是shì shì 不当bù dàng bù dàng 的de de 。。 。
However, the framing as "theft" is technically imprecise - the raid was conducted under legal warrants authorized by the Attorney-General, albeit warrants that the ICJ later effectively found improper in the international context.
更gèng gèng 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de 描述miáo shù miáo shù 应该yīng gāi yīng gāi 是shì shì ,, , 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 了le le 一次yī cì yī cì 动机dòng jī dòng jī 不当bù dàng bù dàng 的de de 搜查sōu chá sōu chá ,, , 以yǐ yǐ 查获chá huò chá huò 受shòu shòu 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 特权tè quán tè quán 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 的de de 材料cái liào cái liào ,, , 其qí qí 明显míng xiǎn míng xiǎn 目的mù dì mù dì 是shì shì 为了wèi le wèi le 破坏pò huài pò huài 一个yí gè yí gè 外国wài guó wài guó 对duì duì 其qí qí 提起tí qǐ tí qǐ 的de de 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 诉讼sù sòng sù sòng 。。 。
The more accurate characterization would be that Australia conducted an improperly motivated raid to seize legally privileged material for the apparent purpose of disrupting a foreign nation's legal case against it.

📚 来源与引用 (8)

  1. 1
    abc.net.au

    abc.net.au

    A lawyer representing East Timor in its spying case against Australia says his office has been raided by the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) and accused the agency of "muzzling" a key witness. Bernard Collaery says a number of agents seized electronic and paper files on Tuesday afternoon from his law practice in Canberra. East Timor has accused the Australia Secret Intelligence Service (ASIS) of covertly recording Timorese ministers and officials during oil-and-gas negotiations with Australia in 2004. Mr Collaery says a former spy turned whistleblower who had been due to give evidence to The Hague has been arrested in a separate raid in Canberra. The ABC is trying to confirm the arrest, but Mr Collaery says it is a "crass" effort by ASIO and the Government to muzzle "the oral evidence of the prime witness".

    Abc Net
  2. 2
    bbc.com

    bbc.com

    Bernard Collaery is a hero in East Timor, but faced prosecution in Australia for revealing a spy mission.

    Bbc
  3. 3
    en.wikipedia.org

    en.wikipedia.org

    Wikipedia
  4. 4
    PDF

    240112GuardianLabor shelves election promise for inquiry into prosecution of Witness K and Bernard Collaery

    Laohamutuk • PDF Document
  5. 5
    icj-cij.org

    icj-cij.org

    Icj-cij

  6. 6
    theage.com.au

    theage.com.au

    The Australian government has admitted it wants to block a former spy turned whistleblower from giving evidence to an international tribunal where East Timor is challenging a treaty between the two countries splitting lucrative oil and gas revenues.

    The Age
  7. 7
    hrlc.org.au

    hrlc.org.au

    The ACT Court of Appeal has published previously secret judgments to mark the end of the Bernard Collaery and Witness K saga, underscoring the need for the Albanese Government to implement transparency and whistleblowing reforms. 

    Human Rights Law Centre
  8. 8
    theconversation.com

    theconversation.com

    The prosecution was a scandal and should never have been commenced. It was a direct assault upon freedom of political communication, and it intimidated whistleblowers.

    The Conversation

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。