属实

评分: 7.0/10

Coalition
C0328

声明内容

“再次削减大学经费,此次削减21亿澳元。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ ** * ** * 在zài zài 事实shì shí shì shí 层面céng miàn céng miàn 是shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de ** * ** * 。。 。
The claim is **factually accurate**.
CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 在zài zài 20172017 2017 年nián nián 1212 12 月yuè yuè 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 《《 《 年nián nián 中zhōng zhōng 经济jīng jì jīng jì 与yǔ yǔ 财政cái zhèng cái zhèng 展望zhǎn wàng zhǎn wàng 》》 》 (( ( MYEFOMYEFO MYEFO )) ) 的de de 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 了le le 2121 21 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 的de de 大学dà xué dà xué 经费jīng fèi jīng fèi 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The Coalition government did announce a $2.1 billion reduction to university funding in December 2017 as part of the Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook (MYEFO) [1].
该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 在zài zài 20182018 2018 -- - 20192019 2019 年nián nián 远期yuǎn qī yuǎn qī 估算gū suàn gū suàn 中zhōng zhōng 实施shí shī shí shī ,, , 将jiāng jiāng 大学dà xué dà xué 经费jīng fèi jīng fèi 冻结dòng jié dòng jié 在zài zài 20172017 2017 -- - 20182018 2018 年nián nián 水平shuǐ píng shuǐ píng ,, , 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ 根据gēn jù gēn jù 通胀tōng zhàng tōng zhàng 或huò huò 学生xué shēng xué shēng 入学rù xué rù xué 人数rén shù rén shù 增长zēng zhǎng zēng zhǎng 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 调整tiáo zhěng tiáo zhěng [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The policy, implemented across 2018-2019 forward estimates, froze university funding at 2017-2018 levels, preventing adjustments for inflation or student enrolment growth [2].
这一zhè yī zhè yī 经费jīng fèi jīng fèi 冻结dòng jié dòng jié 预计yù jì yù jì 将jiāng jiāng 导致dǎo zhì dǎo zhì 约yuē yuē 1010 10 ,, , 000000 000 个gè gè 大学dà xué dà xué 名额míng é míng é 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
This funding freeze was projected to result in approximately 10,000 fewer university places [3].
2121 21 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 这一zhè yī zhè yī 数字shù zì shù zì 在zài zài 多个duō gè duō gè 可靠kě kào kě kào 来源lái yuán lái yuán 中zhōng zhōng 得到dé dào dé dào 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí ,, , 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò TheThe The ConversationConversation Conversation (( ( 一个yí gè yí gè 专注zhuān zhù zhuān zhù 于yú yú 研究yán jiū yán jiū 驱动qū dòng qū dòng 分析fēn xī fēn xī 的de de 学术xué shù xué shù 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ )) ) 和hé hé 议会yì huì yì huì 报告bào gào bào gào 。。 。
The $2.1 billion figure is confirmed across multiple reliable sources including The Conversation (an academic outlet focused on research-driven analysis) and parliamentary reporting.
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ statedstated stated 的de de 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 是shì shì 整合zhěng hé zhěng hé 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 预算yù suàn yù suàn 中zhōng zhōng 的de de 长期cháng qī cháng qī 超支chāo zhī chāo zhī 并bìng bìng 提高tí gāo tí gāo 高等教育gāo děng jiào yù gāo děng jiào yù 的de de 可持续性kě chí xù xìng kě chí xù xìng [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The government's stated rationale was to consolidate chronic overspending in the Federal Budget and improve the sustainability of higher education [2].

缺失背景

然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 中zhōng zhōng "" " 再次zài cì zài cì "" " 和hé hé "" " 此次cǐ cì cǐ cì "" " 的de de 措辞cuò cí cuò cí 掩盖yǎn gài yǎn gài 了le le 一个yí gè yí gè 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 的de de 历史背景lì shǐ bèi jǐng lì shǐ bèi jǐng :: : 长zhǎng zhǎng 达dá dá 十年shí nián shí nián 的de de 大学dà xué dà xué 经费jīng fèi jīng fèi 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 始于shǐ yú shǐ yú 20132013 2013 年nián nián 的de de CoalitionCoalition Coalition 。。 。
However, the claim's framing as "again" and "this time" obscures a critical historical context: the decade-long reduction in university funding did not begin with the Coalition in 2013.
LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ (( ( 20072007 2007 -- - 20132013 2013 )) ) 也yě yě 启动qǐ dòng qǐ dòng 了le le 大幅dà fú dà fú 的de de 大学dà xué dà xué 经费jīng fèi jīng fèi 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
Labor governments (2007-2013) also initiated substantial university funding reductions [4].
到dào dào CoalitionCoalition Coalition 20172017 2017 年nián nián 1212 12 月yuè yuè 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 时shí shí ,, , 跨kuà kuà 两届liǎng jiè liǎng jiè 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 累积lěi jī lěi jī 效应xiào yìng xiào yìng 已使yǐ shǐ yǐ shǐ 过去guò qù guò qù 十年间shí nián jiān shí nián jiān 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 每名měi míng měi míng 学生xué shēng xué shēng 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 了le le 约yuē yuē 10%10% 10% [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
By the Coalition's December 2017 announcement, the cumulative effect of government cuts across both administrations had reduced per-student government funding by approximately 10% over the previous decade [4].
20172017 2017 年nián nián 1212 12 月yuè yuè 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 应yīng yīng 被bèi bèi 理解lǐ jiě lǐ jiě 为wèi wèi 两大liǎng dà liǎng dà 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 的de de 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 战略zhàn lüè zhàn lüè 的de de 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu 的de de 举措jǔ cuò jǔ cuò 。。 。
The December 2017 policy should be understood as part of a broader strategy by both major parties rather than a unique Coalition initiative.
此外cǐ wài cǐ wài ,, , 这一zhè yī zhè yī "" " 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn "" " 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 是shì shì 指zhǐ zhǐ 经费jīng fèi jīng fèi 冻结dòng jié dòng jié ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 已yǐ yǐ 分配fēn pèi fēn pèi 的de de 资金zī jīn zī jīn —— — —— — 大学dà xué dà xué 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 失去shī qù shī qù 当年dāng nián dāng nián 已yǐ yǐ 分配fēn pèi fēn pèi 的de de 经费jīng fèi jīng fèi ,, , 而是ér shì ér shì 未能wèi néng wèi néng 获得huò dé huò dé 用于yòng yú yòng yú 应对yìng duì yìng duì 通胀tōng zhàng tōng zhàng 或huò huò 入学rù xué rù xué 人数rén shù rén shù 增长zēng zhǎng zēng zhǎng 的de de 增加zēng jiā zēng jiā 部分bù fèn bù fèn [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
Additionally, the "cut" was specifically a funding freeze rather than a direct reduction of allocated funding—universities were not losing money allocated for that year, but rather failing to receive increases for inflation or enrollment growth [2].
该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 还hái hái 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le 这zhè zhè 是shì shì CoalitionCoalition Coalition 第三次dì sān cì dì sān cì 尝试cháng shì cháng shì 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 大学dà xué dà xué 经费jīng fèi jīng fèi 。。 。
The claim also omits that this policy was the third major attempt at university funding reduction by the Coalition.
参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 此前cǐ qián cǐ qián 已yǐ yǐ 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ 了le le 规模guī mó guī mó 更大gèng dà gèng dà 的de de 2828 28 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 提议tí yì tí yì [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] ,, , 而ér ér 2121 21 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 这一zhè yī zhè yī 数字shù zì shù zì 是shì shì 在zài zài 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 谈判tán pàn tán pàn 后hòu hòu 达成dá chéng dá chéng 的de de 妥协tuǒ xié tuǒ xié 。。 。
The Senate had previously blocked larger proposed cuts of $2.8 billion [5], and the $2.1 billion figure represents a compromise after legislative negotiations.

来源可信度评估

** * ** * TheThe The NewNew New DailyDaily Daily ** * ** * 是shì shì 一家yī jiā yī jiā 偏piān piān 左翼zuǒ yì zuǒ yì 的de de 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 机构jī gòu jī gòu ,, , 由yóu yóu IndustryIndustry Industry SuperSuper Super HoldingsHoldings Holdings (( ( 由yóu yóu 养老yǎng lǎo yǎng lǎo 基金jī jīn jī jīn 控制kòng zhì kòng zhì )) ) 拥有yōng yǒu yōng yǒu ,, , 并bìng bìng 由yóu yóu 前qián qián LaborLabor Labor 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng GregGreg Greg CombetCombet Combet 领导lǐng dǎo lǐng dǎo [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
**The New Daily** is a left-center media outlet owned by Industry Super Holdings (controlled by superannuation funds) and led by former Labor Minister Greg Combet [6].
根据gēn jù gēn jù MediaMedia Media BiasBias Bias // / FactFact Fact CheckCheck Check 的de de 评级píng jí píng jí ,, , TheThe The NewNew New DailyDaily Daily 被bèi bèi 评为píng wèi píng wèi "" " 基本jī běn jī běn 属实shǔ shí shǔ shí "" " ,, , 带有dài yǒu dài yǒu 左翼zuǒ yì zuǒ yì 倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng ,, , 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 它tā tā 缺乏quē fá quē fá 超链接chāo liàn jiē chāo liàn jiē 来源lái yuán lái yuán 且qiě qiě 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 依赖yī lài yī lài 转载zhuǎn zǎi zhuǎn zǎi 的de de AAPAAP AAP 内容nèi róng nèi róng [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
According to Media Bias/Fact Check, The New Daily is rated as "Mostly Factual" with a left-center bias, though it lacks hyperlinked sourcing and relies heavily on republished AAP content [6].
对于duì yú duì yú 这一zhè yī zhè yī 特定tè dìng tè dìng 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ ,, , TheThe The NewNew New DailyDaily Daily 的de de 角色jué sè jué sè 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 调查diào chá diào chá 性xìng xìng 新闻xīn wén xīn wén ,, , 而是ér shì ér shì 报道bào dào bào dào // / 放大fàng dà fàng dà 已yǐ yǐ 被bèi bèi 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 报道bào dào bào dào 的de de 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 官方guān fāng guān fāng 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 。。 。
For this particular claim, The New Daily's role was not investigative journalism but rather reporting/amplifying an official government announcement already widely covered by mainstream media.
underlyingunderlying underlying 的de de 2121 21 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 数字shù zì shù zì 可kě kě 通过tōng guò tōng guò 独立dú lì dú lì 于yú yú TheThe The NewNew New DailyDaily Daily 的de de 权威quán wēi quán wēi 来源lái yuán lái yuán 核实hé shí hé shí ,, , 这zhè zhè 使得shǐ de shǐ de 该gāi gāi 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 的de de 偏见piān jiàn piān jiàn 对duì duì 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 准确性zhǔn què xìng zhǔn què xìng 的de de 相关性xiāng guān xìng xiāng guān xìng 降低jiàng dī jiàng dī 。。 。
The underlying $2.1 billion figure is verifiable through authoritative sources independent of The New Daily, making the outlet's bias less relevant to claim accuracy.
该gāi gāi 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 的de de 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 视角shì jiǎo shì jiǎo 自然zì rán zì rán 会huì huì 强调qiáng diào qiáng diào 该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 的de de 负面fù miàn fù miàn 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 而ér ér 缺乏quē fá quē fá 平衡píng héng píng héng 的de de 语境yǔ jìng yǔ jìng 。。 。
The outlet's political perspective naturally emphasizes the negative aspects of the policy without balanced context.
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做过zuò guò zuò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng ?? ?
**Did Labor do something similar?** **Search conducted:** "Labor government university funding policy history education cuts" **Finding:** Yes, Labor initiated university funding reductions.
** * ** *
Labor governments (2007-2013) began the process of reducing government university subsidies [4].
** * ** * 搜索sōu suǒ sōu suǒ 内容nèi róng nèi róng :: : ** * ** * "" " LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 大学dà xué dà xué 经费jīng fèi jīng fèi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ 教育jiào yù jiào yù 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn "" "
When Labor returned to government in 2022, they did NOT reverse Coalition funding cuts or substantially restore pre-cut funding levels.
** * ** * 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn :: : ** * ** * 是shì shì 的de de ,, , LaborLabor Labor 启动qǐ dòng qǐ dòng 了le le 大学dà xué dà xué 经费jīng fèi jīng fèi 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 。。 。
Instead, Labor introduced targeted programs for disadvantaged students and debt relief (wiping $3 billion in indexation increases) while maintaining the Coalition's "Job-Ready Graduates" program, which continues to steer funding toward vocational courses over traditional arts/humanities [7].
LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ (( ( 20072007 2007 -- - 20132013 2013 )) ) 开始kāi shǐ kāi shǐ 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 对duì duì 大学dà xué dà xué 的de de 补贴bǔ tiē bǔ tiē [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
The critical comparison: both parties have progressively reduced per-student government funding, forcing universities to increase reliance on student fees and international student revenue.
当dāng dāng LaborLabor Labor 于yú yú 20222022 2022 年nián nián 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 时shí shí ,, , 他们tā men tā men 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 逆转nì zhuǎn nì zhuǎn CoalitionCoalition Coalition 的de de 经费jīng fèi jīng fèi 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 或huò huò 大幅dà fú dà fú 恢复huī fù huī fù 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 前qián qián 的de de 经费jīng fèi jīng fèi 水平shuǐ píng shuǐ píng 。。 。
The cumulative effect across both Labor and Coalition periods has been a systematic shift from government-funded to student-funded higher education, with neither party reversing this trend upon returning to government [4].
相反xiāng fǎn xiāng fǎn ,, , LaborLabor Labor 推出tuī chū tuī chū 了le le 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 弱势ruò shì ruò shì 学生xué shēng xué shēng 的de de 定向dìng xiàng dìng xiàng 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 和hé hé 债务zhài wù zhài wù 减免jiǎn miǎn jiǎn miǎn (( ( 免除miǎn chú miǎn chú 3030 30 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 的de de 指数化zhǐ shù huà zhǐ shù huà 增长zēng zhǎng zēng zhǎng )) ) ,, , 同时tóng shí tóng shí 维持wéi chí wéi chí 了le le CoalitionCoalition Coalition 的de de "" " 就业jiù yè jiù yè 准备zhǔn bèi zhǔn bèi 毕业生bì yè shēng bì yè shēng "" " (( ( JobJob Job -- - ReadyReady Ready GraduatesGraduates Graduates )) ) 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù ,, , 该gāi gāi 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 继续jì xù jì xù 将jiāng jiāng 经费jīng fèi jīng fèi 引导yǐn dǎo yǐn dǎo 向xiàng xiàng 职业zhí yè zhí yè 课程kè chéng kè chéng 而ér ér 非传统fēi chuán tǒng fēi chuán tǒng 的de de 文科wén kē wén kē // / 人文rén wén rén wén 课程kè chéng kè chéng [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。 。
关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 对比duì bǐ duì bǐ :: : 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 都dōu dōu 逐步zhú bù zhú bù 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 了le le 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 每名měi míng měi míng 学生xué shēng xué shēng 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn ,, , 迫使pò shǐ pò shǐ 大学dà xué dà xué 增加zēng jiā zēng jiā 对duì duì 学生xué shēng xué shēng 学费xué fèi xué fèi 和hé hé 国际guó jì guó jì 学生xué shēng xué shēng 收入shōu rù shōu rù 的de de 依赖yī lài yī lài 。。 。
跨kuà kuà LaborLabor Labor 和hé hé CoalitionCoalition Coalition 时期shí qī shí qī 的de de 累积lěi jī lěi jī 效应xiào yìng xiào yìng 是shì shì 高等教育gāo děng jiào yù gāo děng jiào yù 经费jīng fèi jīng fèi 从cóng cóng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 资助zī zhù zī zhù 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 地dì dì 转向zhuǎn xiàng zhuǎn xiàng 学生xué shēng xué shēng 资助zī zhù zī zhù ,, , 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 在zài zài 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 时shí shí 都dōu dōu 未wèi wèi 逆转nì zhuǎn nì zhuǎn 这一zhè yī zhè yī 趋势qū shì qū shì [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

虽然suī rán suī rán 批评者pī píng zhě pī píng zhě 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 地dì dì 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū CoalitionCoalition Coalition 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 了le le 大学dà xué dà xué 经费jīng fèi jīng fèi 并bìng bìng 将jiāng jiāng 成本chéng běn chéng běn 转嫁给zhuǎn jià gěi zhuǎn jià gěi 学生xué shēng xué shēng ,, , 但dàn dàn 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ statedstated stated 的de de 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 是shì shì 在zài zài 预算赤字yù suàn chì zì yù suàn chì zì 时期shí qī shí qī 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 的de de 财政cái zhèng cái zhèng 整顿zhěng dùn zhěng dùn [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
While critics accurately argue that the Coalition reduced university funding and shifted costs to students, the government's stated rationale was genuine fiscal consolidation during a period of budget deficits [2].
CoalitionCoalition Coalition 继承jì chéng jì chéng 了le le 一个yí gè yí gè 受shòu shòu 大宗dà zōng dà zōng 商品价格shāng pǐn jià gé shāng pǐn jià gé 下跌xià diē xià diē 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 的de de 经济jīng jì jīng jì (( ( 矿业kuàng yè kuàng yè 收入shōu rù shōu rù 从cóng cóng 20112011 2011 年nián nián 峰值fēng zhí fēng zhí 下降xià jiàng xià jiàng 50%50% 50% )) ) ,, , 并bìng bìng 尝试cháng shì cháng shì 全面quán miàn quán miàn 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 支出zhī chū zhī chū 。。 。
The Coalition inherited an economy affected by declining commodity prices (mining revenue down 50% from 2011 peak) and attempted across-the-board spending reductions.
更gèng gèng 广阔guǎng kuò guǎng kuò 的de de 图景tú jǐng tú jǐng 揭示jiē shì jiē shì 这zhè zhè 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu :: : LaborLabor Labor 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 时shí shí 也yě yě 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 了le le 大学dà xué dà xué 经费jīng fèi jīng fèi 。。 。
The broader picture reveals this was not unique to the Coalition: Labor also reduced university funding when in government.
两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 都dōu dōu 将jiāng jiāng 高等教育gāo děng jiào yù gāo děng jiào yù 经费jīng fèi jīng fèi 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 地dì dì 从cóng cóng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 补贴bǔ tiē bǔ tiē 转向zhuǎn xiàng zhuǎn xiàng 学生xué shēng xué shēng 贡献gòng xiàn gòng xiàn 和hé hé 国际guó jì guó jì 学生xué shēng xué shēng 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng 。。 。
Both parties have systematically shifted higher education funding away from government subsidies toward student contributions and international student fees.
到dào dào 20242024 2024 年nián nián ,, , 一个yí gè yí gè 典型diǎn xíng diǎn xíng 的de de 文科wén kē wén kē // / 社会科学shè huì kē xué shè huì kē xué 学生xué shēng xué shēng 每年měi nián měi nián 支付zhī fù zhī fù 1616 16 ,, , 992992 992 澳元ào yuán ào yuán ,, , 而ér ér 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 补贴bǔ tiē bǔ tiē 仅为jǐn wèi jǐn wèi 11 1 ,, , 286286 286 澳元ào yuán ào yuán ,, , 而ér ér 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ 上shàng shàng 曾céng céng 是shì shì 5050 50 // / 5050 50 的de de 成本chéng běn chéng běn 分担fēn dān fēn dān [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。 。
By 2024, a typical arts/social sciences student pays $16,992 per year with only $1,286 in government subsidy, compared to historical 50/50 cost-sharing [8].
CoalitionCoalition Coalition 提出tí chū tí chū 的de de "" " 可持续性kě chí xù xìng kě chí xù xìng "" " 论点lùn diǎn lùn diǎn 在zài zài 一个yí gè yí gè 意义yì yì yì yì 上shàng shàng 是shì shì 有yǒu yǒu 道理dào lǐ dào lǐ 的de de —— — —— — 在zài zài 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 规定guī dìng guī dìng 的de de 学生xué shēng xué shēng 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng 上限shàng xiàn shàng xiàn 下xià xià 运营yùn yíng yùn yíng 的de de 大学dà xué dà xué 面临miàn lín miàn lín 收入shōu rù shōu rù 压力yā lì yā lì —— — —— — 但dàn dàn 这个zhè ge zhè ge 问题wèn tí wèn tí 部分bù fèn bù fèn 是shì shì 由yóu yóu 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 经费jīng fèi jīng fèi 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 自身zì shēn zì shēn 造成zào chéng zào chéng 的de de 。。 。
The "sustainability" argument the Coalition made has merit in one sense—universities operating under government-mandated caps on student fees struggle with revenue pressures—but this problem is partly self-created by both parties' funding reduction policies.
被忽视bèi hū shì bèi hū shì 的de de 权衡quán héng quán héng 是shì shì 对duì duì 弱势ruò shì ruò shì 学生xué shēng xué shēng 教育jiào yù jiào yù 机会jī huì jī huì 的de de 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 长期cháng qī cháng qī 知识经济zhī shí jīng jì zhī shí jīng jì 竞争力jìng zhēng lì jìng zhēng lì 。。 。
The trade-off being ignored is the impact on educational access for disadvantaged students and Australia's long-term knowledge economy competitiveness. **Key context:** University funding cuts are NOT unique to the Coalition.
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng :: : ** * ** * 大学dà xué dà xué 经费jīng fèi jīng fèi 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu 。。 。
This is a bipartisan approach that has intensified across three decades (Labor, Coalition, Labor), with neither party substantially reversing the trend.
这是zhè shì zhè shì 一种yī zhǒng yī zhǒng 跨越kuà yuè kuà yuè 三十年sān shí nián sān shí nián (( ( LaborLabor Labor 、、 、 CoalitionCoalition Coalition 、、 、 LaborLabor Labor )) ) 日益rì yì rì yì 加强jiā qiáng jiā qiáng 的de de 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 共同gòng tóng gòng tóng 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ ,, , 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 都dōu dōu 未wèi wèi 实质性shí zhì xìng shí zhì xìng 逆转nì zhuǎn nì zhuǎn 这一zhè yī zhè yī 趋势qū shì qū shì 。。 。

属实

7.0

/ 10

2121 21 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 经费jīng fèi jīng fèi 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 在zài zài 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng 是shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de 。。 。
The $2.1 billion funding reduction announcement is factually accurate.
CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 在zài zài 20172017 2017 年nián nián 1212 12 月yuè yuè 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 了le le 这zhè zhè 一yī yī 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè ,, , 并且bìng qiě bìng qiě 如rú rú 描述miáo shù miáo shù 的de de 那样nà yàng nà yàng 得到dé dào dé dào 了le le 实施shí shī shí shī 。。 。
The Coalition government did announce this policy in December 2017, and it was implemented as described.
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 中zhōng zhōng "" " 再次zài cì zài cì ,, , 此次cǐ cì cǐ cì 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 2121 21 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán "" " 的de de 措辞cuò cí cuò cí 在zài zài 某种程度mǒu zhǒng chéng dù mǒu zhǒng chéng dù 上shàng shàng 夸大kuā dà kuā dà 了le le 实际shí jì shí jì 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng —— — —— — 这zhè zhè 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 是shì shì CoalitionCoalition Coalition 第三次dì sān cì dì sān cì 尝试cháng shì cháng shì 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 大学dà xué dà xué 经费jīng fèi jīng fèi (( ( 此前cǐ qián cǐ qián 更大gèng dà gèng dà 的de de 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 被bèi bèi 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ )) ) ,, , 并且bìng qiě bìng qiě 关键性guān jiàn xìng guān jiàn xìng 地dì dì 掩盖yǎn gài yǎn gài 了le le 长达zhǎng dá zhǎng dá 十年shí nián shí nián 的de de 大学dà xué dà xué 经费jīng fèi jīng fèi 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 始于shǐ yú shǐ yú LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 并bìng bìng 跨越kuà yuè kuà yuè 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 持续chí xù chí xù 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 且qiě qiě 未wèi wèi 被bèi bèi 逆转nì zhuǎn nì zhuǎn 的de de 事实shì shí shì shí 。。 。
However, the claim's framing as "again, this time by $2.1 billion" somewhat sensationalizes what was actually the third major attempt at university funding reduction by the Coalition (with earlier larger cuts blocked by the Senate), and critically obscures that decade-long university funding reductions began under Labor and have continued across both parties without reversal.

📚 来源与引用 (1)

  1. 1
    ministers.treasury.gov.au

    Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook announcement - Australian Government

    Ministers Treasury Gov

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。