属实

评分： 8.0/10

报告问题
Coalition
C0278

声明内容

“再次削减TAFE资金，这次是2.7亿澳元。”
教育 青年
原始来源： Matthew Davis

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

关于guān yú guān yú CoalitionCoalition Coalition 在zài zài 20182018 2018 年nián nián 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn TAFETAFE TAFE 资金zī jīn zī jīn 2.72.7 2.7 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 的de de 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 是shì shì ** * ** * 事实shì shí shì shí 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de ** * ** * [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The claim that the Coalition cut TAFE funding by $270 million in 2018 is **factually accurate** [1].
 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 财政部长cái zhèng bù zhǎng cái zhèng bù zhǎng ，， ， ScottScott Scott MorrisonMorrison Morrison 公布gōng bù gōng bù 了le le 20182018 2018 年nián nián 预算案yù suàn àn yù suàn àn ，， ， 其中qí zhōng qí zhōng 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 从cóng cóng 学徒制xué tú zhì xué tú zhì 和hé hé 职业zhí yè zhí yè 教育jiào yù jiào yù 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 中zhōng zhōng 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 2.72.7 2.7 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
As Treasurer, Scott Morrison handed down the 2018 Budget which included a $270 million cut from apprenticeships and vocational education programs [1].
 多个duō gè duō gè 消息来源xiāo xī lái yuán xiāo xī lái yuán 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí 了le le 这zhè zhè 一yī yī 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 数字shù zì shù zì [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] ，， ， 有yǒu yǒu 报道bào dào bào dào 称chēng chēng 20182018 2018 年nián nián 联邦lián bāng lián bāng TAFETAFE TAFE 资金zī jīn zī jīn 被bèi bèi 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 了le le 约yuē yuē 11%11% 11% [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
Multiple sources corroborate this specific figure [2], with reports indicating that federal TAFE funding was cut by approximately 11 per cent in 2018 [3].
 20182018 2018 年nián nián 的de de 预算yù suàn yù suàn 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 是shì shì 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 模式mó shì mó shì 的de de 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn ：： ： 20132013 2013 年nián nián 至zhì zhì 20212021 2021 年间nián jiān nián jiān ，， ， CoalitionCoalition Coalition 自zì zì 上任shàng rèn shàng rèn 以来yǐ lái yǐ lái 总共zǒng gòng zǒng gòng 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 了le le 3030 30 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 的de de TAFETAFE TAFE 资金zī jīn zī jīn [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
The 2018 budget cut was part of a broader pattern: between 2013 and 2021, the Coalition had cut a total of $3 billion from TAFE funding since coming to office [4].
 随后suí hòu suí hòu 的de de 几年jǐ nián jǐ nián 里lǐ lǐ 继续jì xù jì xù 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 资金zī jīn zī jīn —— — —— — 根据gēn jù gēn jù 国家guó jiā guó jiā 职业zhí yè zhí yè 教育jiào yù jiào yù 研究yán jiū yán jiū 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn （（ （ NCVERNCVER NCVER ）） ） 的de de 报告bào gào bào gào ，， ， MorrisonMorrison Morrison 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 随后suí hòu suí hòu 几年jǐ nián jǐ nián 从cóng cóng TAFETAFE TAFE 预算yù suàn yù suàn 中zhōng zhōng 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 了le le 3.253.25 3.25 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 资金zī jīn zī jīn [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
Additional funding cuts continued in subsequent years - Morrison government cuts totaled $325 million in funding from TAFE budgets in following years according to reports from the National Centre for Vocational Education (NCVER) [5].

缺失背景

然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 的de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 因素yīn sù yīn sù ：： ：
However, the claim omits several important contextual factors: **Policy Rationale**: The Coalition government's rationale was to shift focus toward industry-led design of courses.
 ** * ** * 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu ** * ** * ：： ： CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 是shì shì 将jiāng jiāng 重点zhòng diǎn zhòng diǎn 转向zhuǎn xiàng zhuǎn xiàng 行业háng yè háng yè 主导zhǔ dǎo zhǔ dǎo 的de de 课程设计kè chéng shè jì kè chéng shè jì 。。 。
Scott Morrison stated that the Federal Government's National Skills Commission meant industry would dominate the design of courses [1].
 ScottScott Scott MorrisonMorrison Morrison 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì ，， ， 联邦政府lián bāng zhèng fǔ lián bāng zhèng fǔ 的de de 国家guó jiā guó jiā 技能jì néng jì néng 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 意味着yì wèi zhe yì wèi zhe 行业háng yè háng yè 将jiāng jiāng 主导zhǔ dǎo zhǔ dǎo 课程设计kè chéng shè jì kè chéng shè jì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
This represented a philosophical difference in approach to vocational education funding rather than simple reductions. **Broader Policy Framework**: The 2018 budget cuts were accompanied by policy changes to how training was delivered and funded, not simply removals of funds without alternative programs.
 这zhè zhè 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 了le le 对duì duì 职业zhí yè zhí yè 教育jiào yù jiào yù fundingfunding funding 方式fāng shì fāng shì 的de de 理念lǐ niàn lǐ niàn 差异chā yì chā yì ，， ， 而ér ér 不仅仅bù jǐn jǐn bù jǐn jǐn 是shì shì 简单jiǎn dān jiǎn dān 的de de 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 。。 。
The government introduced the "Skilling Australians Fund" as part of its overall vocational education strategy [2]. **State vs Federal Responsibility**: TAFE funding operates in a complex federal/state funding arrangement.
 ** * ** * 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià ** * ** * ：： ： 20182018 2018 年nián nián 的de de 预算yù suàn yù suàn 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 伴随bàn suí bàn suí 着zhe zhe 培训péi xùn péi xùn 交付jiāo fù jiāo fù 和hé hé fundingfunding funding 方式fāng shì fāng shì 的de de 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé ，， ， 而ér ér 不仅仅bù jǐn jǐn bù jǐn jǐn 是shì shì 简单jiǎn dān jiǎn dān 地dì dì 移除yí chú yí chú 资金zī jīn zī jīn 而ér ér 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 替代tì dài tì dài 方案fāng àn fāng àn 。。 。
While the Coalition cut federal funding, state governments also controlled significant portions of TAFE budgets.
 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 推出tuī chū tuī chū 了le le "" " 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 技能jì néng jì néng 基金jī jīn jī jīn "" " 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 其qí qí 整体zhěng tǐ zhěng tǐ 职业zhí yè zhí yè 教育jiào yù jiào yù 战略zhàn lüè zhàn lüè 的de de 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The 2018-19 operating budget predicted further shortfalls, but these were attributed to reduced federal and state government revenue combined [6]. **Cumulative Impact**: The claim uses "again," implying this was a repeated pattern.
 ** * ** * 州zhōu zhōu 与yǔ yǔ 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 的de de 责任zé rèn zé rèn 划分huà fēn huà fēn ** * ** * ：： ： TAFETAFE TAFE fundingfunding funding 在zài zài 复杂fù zá fù zá 的de de 联邦lián bāng lián bāng // / 州zhōu zhōu fundingfunding funding 安排ān pái ān pái 中zhōng zhōng 运作yùn zuò yùn zuò 。。 。
This is accurate - the $270 million cut in 2018 was indeed part of ongoing reductions since 2013, not an isolated action [4].
 虽然suī rán suī rán CoalitionCoalition Coalition 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 了le le 联邦lián bāng lián bāng fundingfunding funding ，， ， 但dàn dàn 州政府zhōu zhèng fǔ zhōu zhèng fǔ 也yě yě 控制kòng zhì kòng zhì 着zhe zhe TAFETAFE TAFE 预算yù suàn yù suàn 的de de 很大hěn dà hěn dà 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn 。。 。
20182018 2018 -- - 1919 19 年度nián dù nián dù 的de de 运营yùn yíng yùn yíng 预算yù suàn yù suàn 预测yù cè yù cè 了le le 进一步jìn yí bù jìn yí bù 的de de 短缺duǎn quē duǎn quē ，， ， 但dàn dàn 这zhè zhè 被bèi bèi 归因于guī yīn yú guī yīn yú 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 和hé hé 州政府zhōu zhèng fǔ zhōu zhèng fǔ 收入shōu rù shōu rù 的de de combinedcombined combined 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 累积lěi jī lěi jī 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng ** * ** * ：： ： 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng "" " 再次zài cì zài cì "" " ，， ， 暗示àn shì àn shì 这是zhè shì zhè shì 一种yī zhǒng yī zhǒng 重复chóng fù chóng fù 模式mó shì mó shì 。。 。
这是zhè shì zhè shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de —— — —— — 20182018 2018 年nián nián 的de de 2.72.7 2.7 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 确实què shí què shí 是shì shì 自zì zì 20132013 2013 年nián nián 以来yǐ lái yǐ lái 持续chí xù chí xù 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 的de de 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn ，， ， 而ér ér 不是bú shì bú shì 孤立gū lì gū lì 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。

来源可信度评估

原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán 是shì shì 《《 《 卫报wèi bào wèi bào 》》 》 20182018 2018 年nián nián 55 5 月yuè yuè 88 8 日rì rì 的de de 预算yù suàn yù suàn 直播zhí bō zhí bō 报道bào dào bào dào 。。 。
The original source provided is The Guardian's live budget coverage from May 8, 2018.
 《《 《 卫报wèi bào wèi bào 》》 》 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 版bǎn bǎn 是shì shì 一个yí gè yí gè 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 机构jī gòu jī gòu ，， ， 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 中zhōng zhōng 左翼zuǒ yì zuǒ yì 编辑biān jí biān jí 倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng ，， ， 自然zì rán zì rán 会huì huì 强调qiáng diào qiáng diào 对duì duì CoalitionCoalition Coalition 预算yù suàn yù suàn 决策jué cè jué cè 的de de 批评pī píng pī píng 。。 。
The Guardian Australia is a mainstream news organization with center-left editorial leanings, which would naturally highlight criticisms of Coalition budget decisions.
 然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， 《《 《 卫报wèi bào wèi bào 》》 》 是shì shì 一个yí gè yí gè 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 专业zhuān yè zhuān yè 报道bào dào bào dào 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 的de de 可信kě xìn kě xìn 国际guó jì guó jì 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 机构jī gòu jī gòu [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。 。
However, The Guardian is a credible international news organization with professional reporting standards [7].
 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 机构jī gòu jī gòu 的de de 预算yù suàn yù suàn 直播zhí bō zhí bō 报道bào dào bào dào 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 在zài zài 报道bào dào bào dào 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 预算yù suàn yù suàn announcementannouncement announcement 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 事实shì shí shì shí 可靠kě kào kě kào ，， ， 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 编辑biān jí biān jí 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 可能kě néng kě néng 强调qiáng diào qiáng diào 负面fù miàn fù miàn 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 。。 。
Live budget coverage from major news outlets is typically factually reliable for reporting government budget announcements, though editorial framing may emphasize negative aspects.
 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 的de de 2.72.7 2.7 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 数字shù zì shù zì 已yǐ yǐ 被bèi bèi 工会gōng huì gōng huì 来源lái yuán lái yuán （（ （ 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 教育jiào yù jiào yù 工会gōng huì gōng huì ）） ） 和hé hé 其他qí tā qí tā 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí ，， ， 这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 这是zhè shì zhè shì 一个yí gè yí gè 有yǒu yǒu 充分chōng fèn chōng fèn 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 记录jì lù jì lù 的de de 事实shì shí shì shí ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 有yǒu yǒu 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì 的de de 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The specific $270 million figure has been corroborated by union sources (Australian Education Union) and other mainstream media outlets, suggesting this is a well-documented fact rather than a disputed claim [1][2].
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 支持zhī chí zhī chí 或huò huò 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì TAFETAFE TAFE 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn ？？ ？
**Did Labor support or oppose TAFE cuts?** Labor opposition to TAFE funding cuts has been consistent.
 ** * ** *
In the 2018 Budget Reply speech, Opposition Leader Bill Shorten specifically criticized the Coalition's education cuts [8].
 LaborLabor Labor 对duì duì TAFETAFE TAFE fundingfunding funding 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 的de de 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 一直yì zhí yì zhí 如rú rú 一yī yī 。。 。
Labor has positioned itself as supportive of TAFE funding and has opposed Coalition reductions throughout their time in opposition [4].
 在zài zài 20182018 2018 年nián nián 预算yù suàn yù suàn 答辩dá biàn dá biàn 演讲yǎn jiǎng yǎn jiǎng 中zhōng zhōng ，， ， 反对党fǎn duì dǎng fǎn duì dǎng 领袖lǐng xiù lǐng xiù BillBill Bill ShortenShorten Shorten 特别tè bié tè bié 批评pī píng pī píng 了le le CoalitionCoalition Coalition 的de de 教育jiào yù jiào yù 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。 。
However, this analysis reveals an important distinction: Labor's historical relationship with TAFE funding is more nuanced than simple opposition to cuts.
 LaborLabor Labor 将jiāng jiāng 自己zì jǐ zì jǐ 定位dìng wèi dìng wèi 为wèi wèi 支持zhī chí zhī chí TAFETAFE TAFE fundingfunding funding ，， ， 并bìng bìng 在zài zài 整个zhěng gè zhěng gè 反对党fǎn duì dǎng fǎn duì dǎng 时期shí qī shí qī 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì CoalitionCoalition Coalition 的de de 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
Labor governments (2007-2013) also had to manage vocational education within budget constraints.
 然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， 这一zhè yī zhè yī 分析fēn xī fēn xī 揭示jiē shì jiē shì 了le le 一个yí gè yí gè 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 区别qū bié qū bié ：： ： LaborLabor Labor 与yǔ yǔ TAFETAFE TAFE fundingfunding funding 的de de 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ 关系guān xì guān xì 比bǐ bǐ 简单jiǎn dān jiǎn dān 地dì dì 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 更为gèng wéi gèng wéi 微妙wēi miào wēi miào 。。 。
The claim does not address whether Labor, when in government previously, maintained significantly higher TAFE funding or whether this reflects a genuine policy difference or typical government budget management.
 LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ （（ （ 20072007 2007 -- - 20132013 2013 ）） ） 也yě yě 必须bì xū bì xū 在zài zài 预算yù suàn yù suàn 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 内nèi nèi 管理guǎn lǐ guǎn lǐ 职业zhí yè zhí yè 教育jiào yù jiào yù 。。 。
Labor's stated position during 2013-2022 was that TAFE deserved higher federal funding and that Coalition cuts were damaging vocational education capacity.
 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 涉及shè jí shè jí LaborLabor Labor 在zài zài 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 期间qī jiān qī jiān 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 维持wéi chí wéi chí 了le le 显著xiǎn zhù xiǎn zhù 较jiào jiào 高gāo gāo 的de de TAFETAFE TAFE fundingfunding funding ，， ， 或者huò zhě huò zhě 这zhè zhè 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 了le le 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 差异chā yì chā yì 或huò huò 典型diǎn xíng diǎn xíng 的de de 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 预算yù suàn yù suàn 管理guǎn lǐ guǎn lǐ 。。 。
This appears to be a genuine policy difference between the parties [4].
 LaborLabor Labor 在zài zài 20132013 2013 -- - 20222022 2022 年nián nián 期间qī jiān qī jiān 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 的de de 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 是shì shì ，， ， TAFETAFE TAFE 应yīng yīng 获得huò dé huò dé 更gèng gèng 高gāo gāo 的de de 联邦lián bāng lián bāng fundingfunding funding ，， ， CoalitionCoalition Coalition 的de de 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 正在zhèng zài zhèng zài 损害sǔn hài sǔn hài 职业zhí yè zhí yè 教育jiào yù jiào yù 能力néng lì néng lì 。。 。
这zhè zhè 似乎sì hū sì hū 是shì shì 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 之间zhī jiān zhī jiān 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 差异chā yì chā yì [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

虽然suī rán suī rán 关于guān yú guān yú 2.72.7 2.7 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 的de de 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 是shì shì 事实shì shí shì shí 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de ，， ， 但dàn dàn 完整wán zhěng wán zhěng 的de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 更为gèng wéi gèng wéi 复杂fù zá fù zá ：： ：
While the claim is factually accurate about the $270 million cut, the fuller context is more complex: **Criticisms (documented):** The Coalition's 2018 TAFE funding cut was part of broader vocational education reductions that totaled $3 billion between 2013 and 2021 [4].
 ** * ** * 批评pī píng pī píng （（ （ 有yǒu yǒu 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 记录jì lù jì lù 的de de ）） ） ** * ** * ：： ： CoalitionCoalition Coalition 20182018 2018 年nián nián 的de de TAFETAFE TAFE fundingfunding funding 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 是shì shì 20132013 2013 年nián nián 至zhì zhì 20212021 2021 年间nián jiān nián jiān 总计zǒng jì zǒng jì 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 3030 30 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 的de de 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 职业zhí yè zhí yè 教育jiào yù jiào yù 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 的de de 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
Staff surveys indicated over three-quarters of TAFE staff considered leaving over the past three years due to the impact of budget cuts [9].
 员工yuán gōng yuán gōng 调查diào chá diào chá 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì ，， ， 超过chāo guò chāo guò 四分之三sì fēn zhī sān sì fēn zhī sān 的de de TAFETAFE TAFE 员工yuán gōng yuán gōng 在zài zài 过去guò qù guò qù 三年sān nián sān nián 中因zhōng yīn zhōng yīn 预算yù suàn yù suàn 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 的de de 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 而ér ér 考虑kǎo lǜ kǎo lǜ 离职lí zhí lí zhí [[ [ 99 9 ]] ] 。。 。
The cuts reduced TAFE's capacity to train workers across essential occupations. **Policy Justification:** The Coalition government's approach was not simply austerity, but a deliberate policy shift toward industry-led design of training courses through the National Skills Commission [1].
 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 降低jiàng dī jiàng dī 了le le TAFETAFE TAFE 培训péi xùn péi xùn 基本jī běn jī běn 职业zhí yè zhí yè 工人gōng rén gōng rén 的de de 能力néng lì néng lì 。。 。
This represented a different philosophy about how vocational education should be organized and funded, not merely budgetary constraints. **Comparative Analysis:** During Labor's previous government (2007-2013), vocational education funding was a lower political priority than it has been in Labor's opposition messaging since 2013.
 ** * ** * 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu ** * ** * ：： ： CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 方法fāng fǎ fāng fǎ 不仅仅bù jǐn jǐn bù jǐn jǐn 是shì shì 紧缩jǐn suō jǐn suō ，， ， 而是ér shì ér shì 通过tōng guò tōng guò 国家guó jiā guó jiā 技能jì néng jì néng 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 向xiàng xiàng 行业háng yè háng yè 主导zhǔ dǎo zhǔ dǎo 培训péi xùn péi xùn 课程设计kè chéng shè jì kè chéng shè jì 的de de 刻意kè yì kè yì 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 转变zhuǎn biàn zhuǎn biàn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
Labor's strong advocacy for TAFE funding during Coalition governance suggests they may have deprioritized TAFE during their own time in office, though this requires specific historical comparison. **Systemic Context:** Both Coalition and Labor governments have faced tension between higher education (universities) and vocational education (TAFE) in funding allocations.
 这zhè zhè 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 了le le 对duì duì 职业zhí yè zhí yè 教育jiào yù jiào yù 应yīng yīng 如何rú hé rú hé 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 和hé hé fundingfunding funding 的de de 不同bù tóng bù tóng 理念lǐ niàn lǐ niàn ，， ， 而ér ér 不仅仅bù jǐn jǐn bù jǐn jǐn 是shì shì 预算yù suàn yù suàn 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 。。 。
TAFE funding lagged behind school and university funding under the Coalition, but this represents a long-standing structural issue in Australian education funding rather than a unique Coalition policy [4]. **Impact Recognition:** Even the government acknowledged TAFE sector difficulties after COVID-19, returning some funding when the sector was in crisis [4].
 ** * ** * 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào 分析fēn xī fēn xī ** * ** * ：： ： 在zài zài LaborLabor Labor 上届shàng jiè shàng jiè 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ （（ （ 20072007 2007 -- - 20132013 2013 ）） ） 期间qī jiān qī jiān ，， ， 职业zhí yè zhí yè 教育jiào yù jiào yù fundingfunding funding 的de de 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 优先级yōu xiān jí yōu xiān jí 低于dī yú dī yú 其qí qí 在zài zài 20132013 2013 年nián nián 以来yǐ lái yǐ lái 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 反对党fǎn duì dǎng fǎn duì dǎng 时shí shí 的de de 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 。。 。
This suggests the government recognized the severity of cuts when circumstances forced recognition of TAFE's importance.
 LaborLabor Labor 在zài zài CoalitionCoalition Coalition 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 期间qī jiān qī jiān 对duì duì TAFETAFE TAFE fundingfunding funding 的de de 强力qiáng lì qiáng lì 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng ，， ， 他们tā men tā men 可能kě néng kě néng 在zài zài 自己zì jǐ zì jǐ 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 期间qī jiān qī jiān 将jiāng jiāng TAFETAFE TAFE deprioritizeddeprioritized deprioritized ，， ， 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 这zhè zhè 需要xū yào xū yào 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 的de de 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào 。。 。
** * ** * 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ** * ** * ：： ： CoalitionCoalition Coalition 和hé hé LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 都dōu dōu 面临miàn lín miàn lín 着zhe zhe 高等教育gāo děng jiào yù gāo děng jiào yù （（ （ 大学dà xué dà xué ）） ） 与yǔ yǔ 职业zhí yè zhí yè 教育jiào yù jiào yù （（ （ TAFETAFE TAFE ）） ） 之间zhī jiān zhī jiān 在zài zài fundingfunding funding 分配fēn pèi fēn pèi 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 的de de 紧张jǐn zhāng jǐn zhāng 关系guān xì guān xì 。。 。
在zài zài CoalitionCoalition Coalition 领导lǐng dǎo lǐng dǎo 下xià xià ，， ， TAFETAFE TAFE fundingfunding funding 落后luò hòu luò hòu 于yú yú 中小学zhōng xiǎo xué zhōng xiǎo xué 和hé hé 大学dà xué dà xué fundingfunding funding ，， ， 但dàn dàn 这zhè zhè 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 了le le 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 教育jiào yù jiào yù fundingfunding funding 中长期zhōng cháng qī zhōng cháng qī 存在cún zài cún zài 的de de 结构性jié gòu xìng jié gòu xìng 问题wèn tí wèn tí ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 认知rèn zhī rèn zhī ** * ** * ：： ： 即使jí shǐ jí shǐ 是shì shì 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 也yě yě 在zài zài COVIDCOVID COVID -- - 1919 19 后hòu hòu 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn 了le le TAFETAFE TAFE 部门bù mén bù mén 的de de 困难kùn nán kùn nán ，， ， 当该dāng gāi dāng gāi 部门bù mén bù mén 处于chǔ yú chǔ yú 危机wēi jī wēi jī 时shí shí 恢复huī fù huī fù 了le le 一些yī xiē yī xiē fundingfunding funding [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài circumstancescircumstances circumstances 迫使pò shǐ pò shǐ 认识rèn shí rèn shí 到dào dào TAFETAFE TAFE 重要性zhòng yào xìng zhòng yào xìng 时shí shí ，， ， 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn 了le le 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 的de de 严重性yán zhòng xìng yán zhòng xìng 。。 。

属实

8.0

/ 10

关于guān yú guān yú CoalitionCoalition Coalition 在zài zài 20182018 2018 年nián nián 预算案yù suàn àn yù suàn àn 中zhōng zhōng 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn TAFETAFE TAFE 资金zī jīn zī jīn 2.72.7 2.7 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 的de de 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 是shì shì 事实shì shí shì shí 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 且qiě qiě 有yǒu yǒu 充分chōng fèn chōng fèn 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 记录jì lù jì lù 的de de 。。 。
The specific claim that the Coalition cut TAFE funding by $270 million in 2018 is factually accurate and well-documented.
 多个duō gè duō gè 独立dú lì dú lì 来源lái yuán lái yuán 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí ，， ， 这一zhè yī zhè yī 确切què qiè què qiè 数字shù zì shù zì 是从shì cóng shì cóng ScottScott Scott MorrisonMorrison Morrison 20182018 2018 年nián nián 预算案yù suàn àn yù suàn àn 中zhōng zhōng 的de de 学徒制xué tú zhì xué tú zhì 和hé hé 职业zhí yè zhí yè 教育jiào yù jiào yù 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 中zhōng zhōng 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 的de de 。。 。
Multiple independent sources confirm this exact figure was cut from apprenticeships and vocational education in Scott Morrison's 2018 budget.
 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 地dì dì 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 了le le "" " 再次zài cì zài cì "" " 一词yī cí yī cí ，， ， 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi 这zhè zhè 是shì shì 自zì zì 20132013 2013 年nián nián 以来yǐ lái yǐ lái 持续chí xù chí xù 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn TAFETAFE TAFE 资金zī jīn zī jīn 的de de 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn 。。 。
The claim uses "again" accurately, as this was part of ongoing TAFE funding reductions since 2013.
 然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 一个yí gè yí gè 简单jiǎn dān jiǎn dān 的de de 负面fù miàn fù miàn 陈述chén shù chén shù 呈现chéng xiàn chéng xiàn ，， ， 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu （（ （ 行业háng yè háng yè 主导zhǔ dǎo zhǔ dǎo 培训péi xùn péi xùn 设计shè jì shè jì ）） ） 、、 、 复杂fù zá fù zá 的de de 联邦lián bāng lián bāng // / 州zhōu zhōu fundingfunding funding 动态dòng tài dòng tài ，， ， 或huò huò 关于guān yú guān yú LaborLabor Labor 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ TAFETAFE TAFE fundingfunding funding 优先yōu xiān yōu xiān 事项shì xiàng shì xiàng 的de de 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 。。 。
However, the claim is presented as a simple negative statement without acknowledging policy rationale (industry-led training design), the complex federal/state funding dynamics, or comparative context regarding Labor's historical TAFE funding priorities.
 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 误导wù dǎo wù dǎo ，， ， 但dàn dàn 它tā tā 呈现chéng xiàn chéng xiàn 的de de 是shì shì 部分bù fèn bù fèn 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 全面quán miàn quán miàn 的de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 。。 。
The claim is not misleading, but it presents a partial rather than comprehensive picture.

📚 来源与引用 (9)

  1. 1
    Mirage News - "No money in Morrison Budget to revitalise TAFE"

    Mirage News - "No money in Morrison Budget to revitalise TAFE"

    Scott Morrison and Josh Frydenberg have failed a critical test by continuing the Coalition's appalling neglect of Vocational Education and Training

    Mirage News
  2. 2
    AEU Federal - "What can TAFE expect from the Federal Government?"

    AEU Federal - "What can TAFE expect from the Federal Government?"

    Aeufederal Org
  3. 3
    9News - "Federal TAFE funding slashed by $326m"

    9News - "Federal TAFE funding slashed by $326m"

    A new report reveals funding for TAFE and training programs was cut by 11 per cent in 2018.

    9News
  4. 4
    actu.org.au

    ACTU - "Libs chokehold on TAFE funding key driver in lack of tradies"

    The ACTU has welcomed the government’s new Migration Strategy which will be instrumental to repairing the Coalition Government’s legacy of damage and neglect, which has seen rampant migrant worker exploitation, and employers gaming the system to use temporary migration as a source of cheap labour, rather than training up and giving opportunities to local workers. 

    Australian Council of Trade Unions
  5. 5
    aeuvic.asn.au

    AEU Victoria - "Morrison government continues to undermine TAFE"

    Aeuvic Asn

  6. 6
    NSW Teachers Federation - "TAFE teachers deliver quality despite cuts"

    NSW Teachers Federation - "TAFE teachers deliver quality despite cuts"

    TAFE NSW teachers continue to deliver high-quality vocational education despite a loss of $239.6 million compared with a loss of $51.3 million in 2017.

    NSW Teachers Federation
  7. 7
    The Guardian - About Page

    The Guardian - About Page

    Theguardian
  8. 8
    NSW Teachers Federation - "Budget puts big business ahead of education"

    NSW Teachers Federation - "Budget puts big business ahead of education"

    ​Federation welcomes Labor’s commitment to restore, in full, the $17 billion cut from schools by the Turnbull Government.

    NSW Teachers Federation
  9. 9
    aeuvic.asn.au

    AEU - "National survey reveals impact of TAFE budget cuts"

    Aeuvic Asn

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性，但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。

Previous: C0277 Next: C0279