部分属实

评分: 6.0/10

Coalition
C0726

声明内容

“违背选举承诺,削减数十亿澳元学校资金,并承诺比选举时更少的Gonski改革。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 关于guān yú guān yú CoalitionCoalition Coalition 对duì duì 学校xué xiào xué xiào 资金zī jīn zī jīn 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 既有jì yǒu jì yǒu 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 也yě yě 有yǒu yǒu 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng 元素yuán sù yuán sù 。。 。
The claim has both accurate and misleading elements regarding the Coalition's changes to school funding. **Core factual basis - TRUE:** The Coalition government, upon taking office in September 2013, did significantly alter the Gonski school funding model established by the previous Labor government.
** * ** * 核心hé xīn hé xīn 事实shì shí shì shí 基础jī chǔ jī chǔ -- - 正确zhèng què zhèng què :: : ** * ** *
In November 2013, Education Minister Christopher Pyne announced the government would scrap Labor's Gonski plans and renegotiate agreements with all states and territories within a year [1].
CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 于yú yú 20132013 2013 年nián nián 99 9 月yuè yuè 上台shàng tái shàng tái 后hòu hòu ,, , 确实què shí què shí 显著xiǎn zhù xiǎn zhù 改变gǎi biàn gǎi biàn 了le le 前任qián rèn qián rèn LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì 的de de GonskiGonski Gonski 学校xué xiào xué xiào 资金zī jīn zī jīn 模式mó shì mó shì 。。 。
The Abbott government subsequently changed the funding formula in the 2014 budget, replacing the planned 4.7% and 3% annual indexation rates with Consumer Price Index (CPI) increases from 2018 onwards [2].
20132013 2013 年nián nián 1111 11 月yuè yuè ,, , 教育部长jiào yù bù zhǎng jiào yù bù zhǎng ChristopherChristopher Christopher PynePyne Pyne 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 将jiāng jiāng 放弃fàng qì fàng qì LaborLabor Labor 的de de GonskiGonski Gonski 计划jì huà jì huà ,, , 并bìng bìng 将jiāng jiāng 在zài zài 一年yī nián yī nián 内nèi nèi 与yǔ yǔ 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 州zhōu zhōu 和hé hé 地区dì qū dì qū 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 谈判tán pàn tán pàn 协议xié yì xié yì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The budget papers projected "$80 billion in savings" over 10 years from changes to both hospital and school funding - approximately $30 billion from schools and $50 billion from hospitals [3].
随后suí hòu suí hòu ,, , AbbottAbbott Abbott 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 20142014 2014 年nián nián 预算案yù suàn àn yù suàn àn 中zhōng zhōng 改变gǎi biàn gǎi biàn 了le le 资金zī jīn zī jīn 公式gōng shì gōng shì ,, , 用yòng yòng 消费者xiāo fèi zhě xiāo fèi zhě 物价指数wù jià zhǐ shù wù jià zhǐ shù (( ( CPICPI CPI )) ) 增长zēng zhǎng zēng zhǎng 取代qǔ dài qǔ dài 原yuán yuán 计划jì huà jì huà 的de de 每年měi nián měi nián 4.7%4.7% 4.7% 和hé hé 3%3% 3% 的de de 指数化zhǐ shù huà zhǐ shù huà 率lǜ lǜ ,, , 从cóng cóng 20182018 2018 年nián nián 开始kāi shǐ kāi shǐ 实施shí shī shí shī [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
This represented reduced growth compared to Labor's planned trajectory, not absolute cuts to existing funding levels.
预算yù suàn yù suàn 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 预测yù cè yù cè ,, , 通过tōng guò tōng guò 对duì duì 医院yī yuàn yī yuàn 和hé hé 学校xué xiào xué xiào 的de de 资金zī jīn zī jīn 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé ,, , 1010 10 年内nián nèi nián nèi 可kě kě "" " 节省jié shěng jié shěng 800800 800 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán "" " —— — —— — 其中qí zhōng qí zhōng 约yuē yuē 300300 300 亿yì yì 来自lái zì lái zì 学校xué xiào xué xiào ,, , 500500 500 亿yì yì 来自lái zì lái zì 医院yī yuàn yī yuàn [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
David Gonski himself, the architect of the original review, publicly criticized the Coalition's changes in May 2014, stating "the concept of aspiration ends in 2017" and urging the government to reverse its decision [4]. **However, the claim requires important nuance:** The Coalition did not immediately "cut billions" from school funding in the 2014 budget.
与yǔ yǔ LaborLabor Labor 计划jì huà jì huà 的de de 增长zēng zhǎng zēng zhǎng 轨迹guǐ jì guǐ jì 相比xiāng bǐ xiāng bǐ ,, , 这zhè zhè 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 了le le 增长zēng zhǎng zēng zhǎng 放缓fàng huǎn fàng huǎn ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 对duì duì 现有xiàn yǒu xiàn yǒu 资金zī jīn zī jīn 水平shuǐ píng shuǐ píng 的de de 绝对jué duì jué duì 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 。。 。
School funding continued to increase according to Labor's existing agreements through to 2018.
GonskiGonski Gonski 审查shěn chá shěn chá 的de de 架构师jià gòu shī jià gòu shī DavidDavid David GonskiGonski Gonski 本人běn rén běn rén 于yú yú 20142014 2014 年nián nián 55 5 月yuè yuè 公开批评gōng kāi pī píng gōng kāi pī píng CoalitionCoalition Coalition 的de de 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé ,, , 称chēng chēng "" " 抱负bào fù bào fù 概念gài niàn gài niàn 在zài zài 20172017 2017 年nián nián 终结zhōng jié zhōng jié "" " ,, , 并bìng bìng 敦促dūn cù dūn cù 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 撤销chè xiāo chè xiāo 其qí qí 决定jué dìng jué dìng [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
The changes affected growth rates from 2018 onwards, reducing the rate of increase from 4.7%/3% annually to CPI (forecast at approximately 2.5%) [2].
** * ** * 然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 需要xū yào xū yào 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 的de de 细微xì wēi xì wēi 解释jiě shì jiě shì :: : ** * ** *
ABC Fact Check found that the $30 billion school figure represented a projected difference over 10 years between Labor's planned increases and the Coalition's CPI-based approach, not an actual budget cut [2].
CoalitionCoalition Coalition 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 在zài zài 20142014 2014 年nián nián 预算案yù suàn àn yù suàn àn 中zhōng zhōng 立即lì jí lì jí "" " 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 数十亿shù shí yì shù shí yì "" " 学校xué xiào xué xiào 资金zī jīn zī jīn 。。 。
根据gēn jù gēn jù LaborLabor Labor 的de de 现有xiàn yǒu xiàn yǒu 协议xié yì xié yì ,, , 学校xué xiào xué xiào 资金zī jīn zī jīn 持续增长chí xù zēng zhǎng chí xù zēng zhǎng 至zhì zhì 20182018 2018 年nián nián 。。 。
改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 的de de 是shì shì 20182018 2018 年nián nián 之后zhī hòu zhī hòu 的de de 增长率zēng zhǎng lǜ zēng zhǎng lǜ ,, , 将jiāng jiāng 年增长率nián zēng zhǎng lǜ nián zēng zhǎng lǜ 从cóng cóng 4.7%4.7% 4.7% // / 3%3% 3% 降至jiàng zhì jiàng zhì CPICPI CPI (( ( 预测yù cè yù cè 约yuē yuē 2.5%2.5% 2.5% )) ) [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
ABCABC ABC 事实shì shí shì shí 核查hé chá hé chá 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn ,, , 300300 300 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 学校xué xiào xué xiào 资金zī jīn zī jīn 数字shù zì shù zì 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo LaborLabor Labor 计划jì huà jì huà 增长zēng zhǎng zēng zhǎng 与yǔ yǔ CoalitionCoalition Coalition 基于jī yú jī yú CPICPI CPI 方法fāng fǎ fāng fǎ 之间zhī jiān zhī jiān 1010 10 年nián nián 预测yù cè yù cè 差异chā yì chā yì ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 实际shí jì shí jì 预算yù suàn yù suàn 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。

缺失背景

该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 忽略hū lüè hū lüè 了le le 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 信息xìn xī xìn xī :: :
The claim omits several crucial pieces of context: **1.
** * ** * 11 1 .. . 选前xuǎn qián xuǎn qián 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 含糊不清hán hú bù qīng hán hú bù qīng :: : ** * ** *
The pre-election positioning was ambiguous:** In August 2013, Tony Abbott announced the Coalition would match Labor's school funding for four years, but also stated they would change the Australian Education Act to scrap federal oversight powers [5].
20132013 2013 年nián nián 88 8 月yuè yuè ,, , TonyTony Tony AbbottAbbott Abbott 宣布xuān bù xuān bù CoalitionCoalition Coalition 将jiāng jiāng 在zài zài 四年sì nián sì nián 内nèi nèi 匹配pǐ pèi pǐ pèi LaborLabor Labor 的de de 学校xué xiào xué xiào 资金zī jīn zī jīn ,, , 但dàn dàn 还hái hái 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 将jiāng jiāng 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi 《《 《 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 教育法jiào yù fǎ jiào yù fǎ 》》 》 以yǐ yǐ 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 监督权jiān dū quán jiān dū quán [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
After the election, Abbott defended the changes by claiming people had "misunderstood" the promise, stating: "We are going to keep the promise that we actually made, not the promise that some people thought that we made" [6].
选举xuǎn jǔ xuǎn jǔ 后hòu hòu ,, , AbbottAbbott Abbott 为wèi wèi 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 辩护biàn hù biàn hù ,, , 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 人们rén men rén men "" " 误解wù jiě wù jiě "" " 了le le 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò ,, , 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì :: : "" " 我们wǒ men wǒ men 将jiāng jiāng 履行lǚ xíng lǚ xíng 我们wǒ men wǒ men 实际shí jì shí jì 做出zuò chū zuò chū 的de de 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 某些mǒu xiē mǒu xiē 人rén rén 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 我们wǒ men wǒ men 做出zuò chū zuò chū 的de de 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò "" " [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
This semantic distinction - between "same funding envelope" and "same funding model" - became central to the controversy. **2.
这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 语义yǔ yì yǔ yì 区别qū bié qū bié —— — —— — "" " 相同xiāng tóng xiāng tóng 资金zī jīn zī jīn 总额zǒng é zǒng é "" " 与yǔ yǔ "" " 相同xiāng tóng xiāng tóng 资金zī jīn zī jīn 模式mó shì mó shì "" " —— — —— — 成为chéng wéi chéng wéi 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì 的de de 核心hé xīn hé xīn 。。 。
Funding continued to increase:** Contrary to the impression of immediate cuts, school funding under the Coalition continued to rise.
** * ** * 22 2 .. . 资金zī jīn zī jīn 持续增长chí xù zēng zhǎng chí xù zēng zhǎng :: : ** * ** *
The 2014 budget showed school funding would increase in line with Labor's agreements until 2018 [2].
与yǔ yǔ 立即lì jí lì jí 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 的de de 印象yìn xiàng yìn xiàng 相反xiāng fǎn xiāng fǎn ,, , CoalitionCoalition Coalition 治下zhì xià zhì xià 的de de 学校xué xiào xué xiào 资金zī jīn zī jīn 持续增长chí xù zēng zhǎng chí xù zēng zhǎng 。。 。
The "cuts" were actually reduced future growth projections. **3.
20142014 2014 年nián nián 预算案yù suàn àn yù suàn àn 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì ,, , 学校xué xiào xué xiào 资金zī jīn zī jīn 将jiāng jiāng 按照àn zhào àn zhào LaborLabor Labor 的de de 协议xié yì xié yì 增长zēng zhǎng zēng zhǎng 至zhì zhì 20182018 2018 年nián nián [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
Labor's own implementation was incomplete:** When Labor left office in September 2013, only four states/territories plus the ACT had signed up to the Gonski agreements.
"" " 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn "" " 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 是shì shì 未来wèi lái wèi lái 增长zēng zhǎng zēng zhǎng 预测yù cè yù cè 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 。。 。
Queensland, Western Australia, and the Northern Territory had not signed [7].
** * ** * 33 3 .. . LaborLabor Labor 自身zì shēn zì shēn 执行zhí xíng zhí xíng 不bù bù 完整wán zhěng wán zhěng :: : ** * ** *
The Coalition subsequently reached agreements with these remaining jurisdictions, meaning more schools received funding increases than under Labor's partial implementation [2]. **4.
20132013 2013 年nián nián 99 9 月yuè yuè LaborLabor Labor 下台xià tái xià tái 时shí shí ,, , 仅jǐn jǐn 有yǒu yǒu 44 4 个州gè zhōu gè zhōu // / 地区dì qū dì qū 加上jiā shàng jiā shàng 首都shǒu dū shǒu dū 领地lǐng dì lǐng dì 签署qiān shǔ qiān shǔ 了le le GonskiGonski Gonski 协议xié yì xié yì 。。 。
Labor compromised their own model:** The Gillard government had already compromised the pure Gonski model by promising Catholic and independent schools that "not one of their schools would lose a single dollar" [8].
昆士兰kūn shì lán kūn shì lán 、、 、 西澳大利亚xī ào dà lì yà xī ào dà lì yà 和hé hé 北领地běi lǐng dì běi lǐng dì 未wèi wèi 签署qiān shǔ qiān shǔ [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。 。
This concession significantly weakened the needs-based funding principles, directing substantial resources to already well-funded private schools.
CoalitionCoalition Coalition 随后suí hòu suí hòu 与yǔ yǔ 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 剩余shèng yú shèng yú 司法sī fǎ sī fǎ 管辖区guǎn xiá qū guǎn xiá qū 达成协议dá chéng xié yì dá chéng xié yì ,, , 意味着yì wèi zhe yì wèi zhe 比bǐ bǐ LaborLabor Labor 部分bù fèn bù fèn 执行zhí xíng zhí xíng 时shí shí 更gèng gèng 多duō duō 学校xué xiào xué xiào 获得huò dé huò dé 资金zī jīn zī jīn 增长zēng zhǎng zēng zhǎng [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 44 4 .. . LaborLabor Labor 妥协tuǒ xié tuǒ xié 了le le 自己zì jǐ zì jǐ 的de de 模式mó shì mó shì :: : ** * ** *
GillardGillard Gillard 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 已yǐ yǐ 向xiàng xiàng 天主教tiān zhǔ jiào tiān zhǔ jiào 和hé hé 独立dú lì dú lì 学校xué xiào xué xiào 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò "" " 他们tā men tā men 的de de 任何rèn hé rèn hé 学校xué xiào xué xiào 都dōu dōu 不会bú huì bú huì 损失sǔn shī sǔn shī 一分钱yī fēn qián yī fēn qián "" " ,, , 这zhè zhè 已经yǐ jīng yǐ jīng 妥协tuǒ xié tuǒ xié 了le le 纯粹chún cuì chún cuì 的de de GonskiGonski Gonski 模式mó shì mó shì [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。 。
这一zhè yī zhè yī 让步ràng bù ràng bù 显著xiǎn zhù xiǎn zhù 削弱xuē ruò xuē ruò 了le le 基于jī yú jī yú 需求xū qiú xū qiú 的de de 资金zī jīn zī jīn 原则yuán zé yuán zé ,, , 将jiāng jiāng 大量dà liàng dà liàng 资源zī yuán zī yuán 导向dǎo xiàng dǎo xiàng 本běn běn 已yǐ yǐ 资金zī jīn zī jīn 充足chōng zú chōng zú 的de de 私立学校sī lì xué xiào sī lì xué xiào 。。 。

来源可信度评估

该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 提供tí gōng tí gōng 的de de 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán 可信度kě xìn dù kě xìn dù 各不相同gè bù xiāng tóng gè bù xiāng tóng :: :
The original sources provided with this claim vary in credibility: - **Business Insider Australia** [source 1]: Mainstream business publication with generally factual reporting, though the referenced article presented charts showing projected funding differences rather than actual cuts. - **News.com.au** [source 2]: Mainstream News Corp Australia outlet.
-- - ** * ** * BusinessBusiness Business InsiderInsider Insider AustraliaAustralia Australia ** * ** * [[ [ 来源lái yuán lái yuán 11 1 ]] ] :: : 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 商业shāng yè shāng yè 出版物chū bǎn wù chū bǎn wù ,, , 报道bào dào bào dào 总体zǒng tǐ zǒng tǐ 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí ,, , 但dàn dàn 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 展示zhǎn shì zhǎn shì 的de de 图表tú biǎo tú biǎo 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì 的de de 是shì shì 预测yù cè yù cè 资金zī jīn zī jīn 差异chā yì chā yì 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 实际shí jì shí jì 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 。。 。
Generally factual reporting but with potential conservative editorial leanings. - **Sunshine Coast Daily** [source 3]: Regional newspaper reporting on teacher union responses.
-- - ** * ** * NewsNews News .. . comcom com .. . auau au ** * ** * [[ [ 来源lái yuán lái yuán 22 2 ]] ] :: : 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú NewsNews News CorpCorp Corp AustraliaAustralia Australia 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 。。 。
More limited scope but direct reporting of stakeholder reactions. - **The Guardian** [source 4]: International outlet with generally progressive editorial stance but factual reporting standards.
报道bào dào bào dào 总体zǒng tǐ zǒng tǐ 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí ,, , 但dàn dàn 可能kě néng kě néng 有yǒu yǒu 保守bǎo shǒu bǎo shǒu 编辑biān jí biān jí 倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng 。。 。
The article accurately reported David Gonski's criticism of the Coalition changes.
-- - ** * ** * SunshineSunshine Sunshine CoastCoast Coast DailyDaily Daily ** * ** * [[ [ 来源lái yuán lái yuán 33 3 ]] ] :: : 报道bào dào bào dào 教师jiào shī jiào shī 工会gōng huì gōng huì 回应huí yìng huí yìng 的de de 地区性dì qū xìng dì qū xìng 报纸bào zhǐ bào zhǐ 。。 。
The sources collectively report real events but frame them using Labor's preferred terminology of "cuts" rather than "reduced growth projections." The ABC Fact Check analysis [2] provides the most balanced technical assessment, finding the debate over "$80 billion" was largely "hot air" due to the uncertainty of 10-year projections.
范围fàn wéi fàn wéi 较jiào jiào 有限yǒu xiàn yǒu xiàn ,, , 但dàn dàn 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 报道bào dào bào dào 利益lì yì lì yì 相关者xiāng guān zhě xiāng guān zhě 反应fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 。。 。
-- - ** * ** * TheThe The GuardianGuardian Guardian ** * ** * [[ [ 来源lái yuán lái yuán 44 4 ]] ] :: : 国际guó jì guó jì 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ ,, , 编辑biān jí biān jí 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 总体zǒng tǐ zǒng tǐ 偏piān piān 进步jìn bù jìn bù 但dàn dàn 报道bào dào bào dào 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 。。 。
文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 报道bào dào bào dào DavidDavid David GonskiGonski Gonski 对duì duì CoalitionCoalition Coalition 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 的de de 批评pī píng pī píng 。。 。
这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 来源lái yuán lái yuán 共同gòng tóng gòng tóng 报道bào dào bào dào 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn ,, , 但dàn dàn 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng LaborLabor Labor 偏好piān hǎo piān hǎo 的de de "" " 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn "" " 术语shù yǔ shù yǔ 而ér ér 非fēi fēi "" " 增长zēng zhǎng zēng zhǎng 预测yù cè yù cè 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo "" " 来lái lái 描述miáo shù miáo shù 。。 。
ABCABC ABC 事实shì shí shì shí 核查hé chá hé chá 分析fēn xī fēn xī [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 提供tí gōng tí gōng 最zuì zuì 平衡píng héng píng héng 的de de 技术jì shù jì shù 评估píng gū píng gū ,, , 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn 关于guān yú guān yú "" " 800800 800 亿yì yì "" " 的de de 争论zhēng lùn zhēng lùn 在zài zài 很大hěn dà hěn dà 程度chéng dù chéng dù 上shàng shàng 是shì shì "" " 空话kōng huà kōng huà "" " ,, , 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi 1010 10 年nián nián 预测yù cè yù cè 存在cún zài cún zài 不确定性bù què dìng xìng bù què dìng xìng 。。 。
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做过zuò guò zuò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng ?? ?
**Did Labor do something similar?** Search conducted: "Labor government school funding cuts education spending record" Finding: Labor's approach to education funding was different in mechanism but similar in political practice regarding promises. **Key Labor comparisons:** 1. **Incomplete implementation:** By the time Labor lost government, they had only secured Gonski agreements with 4 of 8 states/territories, leaving significant portions of the country without the funding model [7]. 2. **Compromised principles:** The Gillard government undermined its own needs-based model by guaranteeing no private school would lose funding, effectively using public money to maintain entitlement rather than address need [8]. 3. **Funding reality:** Analysis shows that between 1997-2007 under the Howard Coalition government, Commonwealth funding to private schools rose significantly.
** * ** *
During the Rudd/Gillard years (2008-2013), government funding to independent schools increased by 112%, while real per-student funding increases across all schools were more modest at approximately 24.7% [8]. 4. **Legacy of promises:** Both major parties have made and broken education funding commitments.
搜索sōu suǒ sōu suǒ 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng :: : "" " LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 学校xué xiào xué xiào 资金zī jīn zī jīn 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 教育jiào yù jiào yù 支出zhī chū zhī chū 记录jì lù jì lù "" "
The Coalition's 2013 pre-election positioning was deliberately ambiguous, while Labor's implementation of their own Gonski model was incomplete and compromised.
发现fā xiàn fā xiàn :: : LaborLabor Labor 的de de 教育jiào yù jiào yù 资金zī jīn zī jīn 方法fāng fǎ fāng fǎ 在zài zài 机制jī zhì jī zhì 上shàng shàng 不同bù tóng bù tóng ,, , 但dàn dàn 在zài zài 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 的de de 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 实践shí jiàn shí jiàn 上shàng shàng 相似xiāng sì xiāng sì 。。 。
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn LaborLabor Labor 对比duì bǐ duì bǐ :: : ** * ** *
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 执行zhí xíng zhí xíng 不bù bù 完整wán zhěng wán zhěng :: : ** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 失去shī qù shī qù 政权zhèng quán zhèng quán 时shí shí ,, , 仅jǐn jǐn 在zài zài 88 8 个州gè zhōu gè zhōu // / 地区dì qū dì qū 中zhōng zhōng 的de de 44 4 个gè gè securedsecured secured GonskiGonski Gonski 协议xié yì xié yì ,, , 使shǐ shǐ 全国quán guó quán guó 大部分dà bù fèn dà bù fèn 区域qū yù qū yù 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 该gāi gāi 资金zī jīn zī jīn 模式mó shì mó shì [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。 。
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 原则yuán zé yuán zé 妥协tuǒ xié tuǒ xié :: : ** * ** * GillardGillard Gillard 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 通过tōng guò tōng guò 保证bǎo zhèng bǎo zhèng 私立学校sī lì xué xiào sī lì xué xiào 不会bú huì bú huì 损失sǔn shī sǔn shī 资金zī jīn zī jīn ,, , 破坏pò huài pò huài 了le le 自己zì jǐ zì jǐ 的de de 基于jī yú jī yú 需求xū qiú xū qiú 模式mó shì mó shì ,, , 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 公共gōng gòng gōng gòng 资金zī jīn zī jīn 维持wéi chí wéi chí 特权tè quán tè quán 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 解决jiě jué jiě jué 需求xū qiú xū qiú [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。 。
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 资金zī jīn zī jīn 现实xiàn shí xiàn shí :: : ** * ** * 分析fēn xī fēn xī 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì ,, , 在zài zài HowardHoward Howard CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 的de de 19971997 1997 -- - 20072007 2007 年间nián jiān nián jiān ,, , 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 对duì duì 私立学校sī lì xué xiào sī lì xué xiào 的de de 资金zī jīn zī jīn 显著xiǎn zhù xiǎn zhù 增长zēng zhǎng zēng zhǎng 。。 。
在zài zài RuddRudd Rudd // / GillardGillard Gillard 时期shí qī shí qī (( ( 20082008 2008 -- - 20132013 2013 )) ) ,, , 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 对duì duì 独立dú lì dú lì 学校xué xiào xué xiào 的de de 资金zī jīn zī jīn 增长zēng zhǎng zēng zhǎng 了le le 112%112% 112% ,, , 而ér ér 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 学校xué xiào xué xiào 的de de 人均rén jūn rén jūn 实际shí jì shí jì 资金zī jīn zī jīn 增长zēng zhǎng zēng zhǎng 约yuē yuē 为wèi wèi 24.7%24.7% 24.7% [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。 。
44 4 .. . ** * ** * 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 遗留yí liú yí liú :: : ** * ** * 两大liǎng dà liǎng dà 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 都dōu dōu 做出zuò chū zuò chū 并bìng bìng 违背wéi bèi wéi bèi 了le le 教育jiào yù jiào yù 资金zī jīn zī jīn 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 。。 。
CoalitionCoalition Coalition 的de de 20132013 2013 年nián nián 选前xuǎn qián xuǎn qián 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 故意gù yì gù yì 含糊hán hú hán hú ,, , 而ér ér LaborLabor Labor 对duì duì 自己zì jǐ zì jǐ GonskiGonski Gonski 模式mó shì mó shì 的de de 执行zhí xíng zhí xíng 不bù bù 完整wán zhěng wán zhěng 且qiě qiě 妥协tuǒ xié tuǒ xié 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

CoalitionCoalition Coalition 在zài zài 20132013 2013 -- - 20142014 2014 年nián nián 对duì duì 学校xué xiào xué xiào 资金zī jīn zī jīn 的de de 处理chǔ lǐ chǔ lǐ 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 了le le 政治立场zhèng zhì lì chǎng zhèng zhì lì chǎng 与yǔ yǔ 财政cái zhèng cái zhèng 现实xiàn shí xiàn shí 交汇jiāo huì jiāo huì 的de de 案例àn lì àn lì ,, , 双方shuāng fāng shuāng fāng 都dōu dōu 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 道德dào dé dào dé 高地gāo dì gāo dì ,, , 但dàn dàn 都dōu dōu 在zài zài 从事cóng shì cóng shì 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ 。。 。
The Coalition's handling of school funding in 2013-2014 represents a case of political positioning meeting fiscal reality, with both sides claiming the moral high ground while engaging in similar practices. **Coalition position:** The government argued they maintained the same "funding envelope" - total funding would not decrease.
** * ** * CoalitionCoalition Coalition 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng :: : ** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 辩称biàn chēng biàn chēng 他们tā men tā men 维持wéi chí wéi chí 了le le 相同xiāng tóng xiāng tóng 的de de "" " 资金zī jīn zī jīn 总额zǒng é zǒng é "" " —— — —— — 总zǒng zǒng 资金zī jīn zī jīn 不会bú huì bú huì 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 。。 。
They secured agreements with jurisdictions Labor had failed to reach, expanding coverage.
他们tā men tā men 与yǔ yǔ LaborLabor Labor 未能wèi néng wèi néng 达成dá chéng dá chéng 的de de 司法sī fǎ sī fǎ 管辖区guǎn xiá qū guǎn xiá qū 签署qiān shǔ qiān shǔ 了le le 协议xié yì xié yì ,, , 扩大kuò dà kuò dà 了le le 覆盖范围fù gài fàn wéi fù gài fàn wéi 。。 。
They viewed Labor's 4.7% indexation as fiscally unsustainable long-term and sought to align growth with inflation, a more conservative fiscal approach [2]. **Critics' position:** Education advocates, including David Gonski himself, argued the CPI-based approach would leave schools significantly underfunded relative to needs, particularly in disadvantaged areas.
他们tā men tā men 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi LaborLabor Labor 的de de 4.7%4.7% 4.7% 指数化zhǐ shù huà zhǐ shù huà 长期cháng qī cháng qī 财政cái zhèng cái zhèng 上shàng shàng 不可bù kě bù kě 持续chí xù chí xù ,, , 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 将jiāng jiāng 增长zēng zhǎng zēng zhǎng 与yǔ yǔ 通胀tōng zhàng tōng zhàng 保持一致bǎo chí yí zhì bǎo chí yí zhì ,, , 这是zhè shì zhè shì 一种yī zhǒng yī zhǒng 更gèng gèng 保守bǎo shǒu bǎo shǒu 的de de 财政cái zhèng cái zhèng 方法fāng fǎ fāng fǎ [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The shift from 4.7%/3% growth to CPI represented a real-term reduction in the capacity of schools to meet growing costs, effectively breaking the spirit if not the letter of pre-election commitments [4]. **Comparative context:** Both major Australian parties have manipulated education funding promises for political advantage.
** * ** * 批评者pī píng zhě pī píng zhě 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng :: : ** * ** * 教育jiào yù jiào yù 倡导者chàng dǎo zhě chàng dǎo zhě ,, , 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò DavidDavid David GonskiGonski Gonski 本人běn rén běn rén ,, , 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 基于jī yú jī yú CPICPI CPI 的de de 方法fāng fǎ fāng fǎ 将jiāng jiāng 使shǐ shǐ 学校xué xiào xué xiào 资金zī jīn zī jīn 相对xiāng duì xiāng duì 于yú yú 需求xū qiú xū qiú 严重不足yán zhòng bù zú yán zhòng bù zú ,, , 特别tè bié tè bié 是shì shì 在zài zài 弱势群体ruò shì qún tǐ ruò shì qún tǐ 地区dì qū dì qū 。。 。
Labor campaigned on "fully funded Gonski" in subsequent elections while having failed to fully implement it themselves.
从cóng cóng 4.7%4.7% 4.7% // / 3%3% 3% 增长zēng zhǎng zēng zhǎng 转向zhuǎn xiàng zhuǎn xiàng CPICPI CPI 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 学校xué xiào xué xiào 满足mǎn zú mǎn zú 日益增长rì yì zēng zhǎng rì yì zēng zhǎng 成本chéng běn chéng běn 能力néng lì néng lì 的de de 实际shí jì shí jì 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo ,, , 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 违背wéi bèi wéi bèi 了le le 选前xuǎn qián xuǎn qián 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 的de de 精神jīng shén jīng shén ,, , 即使jí shǐ jí shǐ 不是bú shì bú shì 字面zì miàn zì miàn 意义yì yì yì yì [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
The Coalition promised funding continuity while changing the underlying model.
** * ** * 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng :: : ** * ** * 两大liǎng dà liǎng dà 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 都dōu dōu 为wèi wèi 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 利益lì yì lì yì 操纵cāo zòng cāo zòng 教育jiào yù jiào yù 资金zī jīn zī jīn 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 。。 。
Neither party has achieved the full Gonski vision of needs-based funding - Labor compromised it from inception, while the Coalition reduced its growth trajectory.
LaborLabor Labor 在zài zài 随后suí hòu suí hòu 的de de 选举xuǎn jǔ xuǎn jǔ 中zhōng zhōng 宣传xuān chuán xuān chuán "" " 完全wán quán wán quán 资助zī zhù zī zhù 的de de GonskiGonski Gonski "" " ,, , 而ér ér 自身zì shēn zì shēn 未能wèi néng wèi néng 完全wán quán wán quán 执行zhí xíng zhí xíng 。。 。
This is not unique to the Coalition - it's part of a broader pattern where education funding becomes a political football, with long-term planning sacrificed for short-term electoral positioning by both sides.
CoalitionCoalition Coalition 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 资金zī jīn zī jīn 连续性lián xù xìng lián xù xìng ,, , 同时tóng shí tóng shí 改变gǎi biàn gǎi biàn 底层dǐ céng dǐ céng 模式mó shì mó shì 。。 。
两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 都dōu dōu 未能wèi néng wèi néng 实现shí xiàn shí xiàn 基于jī yú jī yú 需求xū qiú xū qiú 的de de 资金zī jīn zī jīn 这一zhè yī zhè yī 完整wán zhěng wán zhěng 的de de GonskiGonski Gonski 愿景yuàn jǐng yuàn jǐng —— — —— — LaborLabor Labor 从cóng cóng 一yī yī 开始kāi shǐ kāi shǐ 就jiù jiù 妥协tuǒ xié tuǒ xié 了le le ,, , 而ér ér CoalitionCoalition Coalition 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 了le le 其qí qí 增长zēng zhǎng zēng zhǎng 轨迹guǐ jì guǐ jì 。。 。
这zhè zhè 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu —— — —— — 这是zhè shì zhè shì 教育jiào yù jiào yù 资金zī jīn zī jīn 成为chéng wéi chéng wéi 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 足球zú qiú zú qiú 的de de 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 模式mó shì mó shì 的de de 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn ,, , 长期cháng qī cháng qī 规划guī huà guī huà 为wèi wèi 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 的de de 短期duǎn qī duǎn qī 选举xuǎn jǔ xuǎn jǔ 定位dìng wèi dìng wèi 而ér ér 牺牲xī shēng xī shēng 。。 。

部分属实

6.0

/ 10

该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 包含bāo hán bāo hán 事实shì shí shì shí 元素yuán sù yuán sù ,, , 但dàn dàn 歪曲wāi qū wāi qū 了le le 资金zī jīn zī jīn 变化biàn huà biàn huà 的de de 性质xìng zhì xìng zhì 和hé hé 时间shí jiān shí jiān 。。 。
The claim contains factual elements but misrepresents the nature and timing of the funding changes.
CoalitionCoalition Coalition 确实què shí què shí 在zài zài 选举xuǎn jǔ xuǎn jǔ 后hòu hòu 显著xiǎn zhù xiǎn zhù 改变gǎi biàn gǎi biàn 了le le GonskiGonski Gonski 模式mó shì mó shì ,, , 他们tā men tā men 的de de 选前xuǎn qián xuǎn qián 声明shēng míng shēng míng 创造chuàng zào chuàng zào 了le le 他们tā men tā men 未wèi wèi 兑现duì xiàn duì xiàn 的de de 期望qī wàng qī wàng 。。 。
The Coalition did alter the Gonski model significantly after the election, and their pre-election statements created expectations they did not fulfill.
DavidDavid David GonskiGonski Gonski 本人běn rén běn rén 批评pī píng pī píng 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 是shì shì 放弃fàng qì fàng qì 了le le 抱负bào fù bào fù 资金zī jīn zī jīn 目标mù biāo mù biāo [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
David Gonski himself criticized the changes as abandoning the aspirational funding goals [4].
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , "" " 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 数十亿shù shí yì shù shí yì 学校xué xiào xué xiào 资金zī jīn zī jīn "" " 的de de 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng 。。 。
However, the claim that they "cut billions from school funding" is misleading.
根据gēn jù gēn jù LaborLabor Labor 的de de 协议xié yì xié yì ,, , 资金zī jīn zī jīn 持续增长chí xù zēng zhǎng chí xù zēng zhǎng 至zhì zhì 20182018 2018 年nián nián ,, , 300300 300 亿yì yì 数字shù zì shù zì 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 1010 10 年间nián jiān nián jiān 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 的de de 未来wèi lái wèi lái 增长zēng zhǎng zēng zhǎng 预测yù cè yù cè ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 立即lì jí lì jí 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
Funding continued to increase according to Labor's agreements through 2018, and the $30 billion figure represented reduced future growth projections over a decade, not immediate cuts [2].
CoalitionCoalition Coalition 与yǔ yǔ LaborLabor Labor 未能wèi néng wèi néng 争取zhēng qǔ zhēng qǔ 到dào dào 的de de 州zhōu zhōu 签署qiān shǔ qiān shǔ 了le le 协议xié yì xié yì ,, , 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 扩大kuò dà kuò dà 了le le 覆盖范围fù gài fàn wéi fù gài fàn wéi [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The Coalition reached agreements with states Labor had failed to secure, actually expanding coverage [2].
"" " 违背wéi bèi wéi bèi 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò "" " 元素yuán sù yuán sù 存在cún zài cún zài 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì —— — —— — CoalitionCoalition Coalition 坚称jiān chēng jiān chēng 他们tā men tā men 履行lǚ xíng lǚ xíng 了le le "" " 相同xiāng tóng xiāng tóng 资金zī jīn zī jīn 总额zǒng é zǒng é "" " 的de de 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò ,, , 而ér ér 批评者pī píng zhě pī píng zhě 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 他们tā men tā men 违背wéi bèi wéi bèi 了le le 在zài zài 学校xué xiào xué xiào 资金zī jīn zī jīn 上shàng shàng 与yǔ yǔ LaborLabor Labor "" " 同一tóng yī tóng yī 战壕zhàn háo zhàn háo "" " 的de de 精神jīng shén jīng shén [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
The "broken promise" element is arguable - the Coalition maintained they kept their promise of "same funding quantum" while critics argued they broke the spirit of being on a "unity ticket" with Labor on school funding [6].

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。