具有误导性

评分: 4.0/10

Coalition
C0594

声明内容

“在同意该公约两个月后,申请退出保护迁徙鲨鱼的联合国公约。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis
分析时间: 30 Jan 2026

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 包含bāo hán bāo hán 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 事实shì shí shì shí 错误cuò wù cuò wù ,, , 歪曲wāi qū wāi qū 了le le 实际shí jì shí jì 发生fā shēng fā shēng 的de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 。。 。
The claim contains significant factual inaccuracies that misrepresent what actually occurred. **Australia did NOT "withdraw from a UN convention."** What actually happened was that in January 2015, the Australian government lodged a "reservation" against five specific shark species (three thresher shark species and two hammerhead shark species) that had been listed for protection at the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS) meeting in Quito, Ecuador in November 2014 [1].
** * ** * 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi "" " 退出tuì chū tuì chū 联合国lián hé guó lián hé guó 公约gōng yuē gōng yuē "" " 。。 。
The reservation was submitted before the listings were due to take effect on February 8, 2015 [1].
** * ** * 实际shí jì shí jì 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 是shì shì ,, , 20152015 2015 年nián nián 11 1 月yuè yuè ,, , 澳大利亚政府ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ 对duì duì 五种wǔ zhǒng wǔ zhǒng 特定tè dìng tè dìng 鲨鱼shā yú shā yú 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng (( ( 三种sān zhǒng sān zhǒng 长尾zhǎng wěi zhǎng wěi 鲨shā shā 和hé hé 两种liǎng zhǒng liǎng zhǒng 双髻shuāng jì shuāng jì 鲨shā shā )) ) 提出tí chū tí chū 了le le "" " 保留条款bǎo liú tiáo kuǎn bǎo liú tiáo kuǎn "" " ,, , 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 在zài zài 20142014 2014 年nián nián 1111 11 月yuè yuè 厄瓜多尔è guā duō ěr è guā duō ěr 基多jī duō jī duō 举行jǔ xíng jǔ xíng 的de de 《《 《 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 迁徙qiān xǐ qiān xǐ 野生动物yě shēng dòng wù yě shēng dòng wù 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 公约gōng yuē gōng yuē 》》 》 (( ( CMSCMS CMS )) ) 会议huì yì huì yì 上shàng shàng 被bèi bèi 列入liè rù liè rù 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 名单míng dān míng dān [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The claim's characterization of "withdrawing from a convention" is false.
该gāi gāi 保留条款bǎo liú tiáo kuǎn bǎo liú tiáo kuǎn 在zài zài 相关xiāng guān xiāng guān 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 名单míng dān míng dān 原定yuán dìng yuán dìng 生效shēng xiào shēng xiào 日期rì qī rì qī 20152015 2015 年nián nián 22 2 月yuè yuè 88 8 日rì rì 之前zhī qián zhī qián 提交tí jiāo tí jiāo [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
Australia remained a signatory to the CMS convention and continued to participate actively.
该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 将jiāng jiāng "" " 退出tuì chū tuì chū 公约gōng yuē gōng yuē "" " 的de de 定性dìng xìng dìng xìng 是shì shì 错误cuò wù cuò wù 的de de 。。 。
As Environment Minister Greg Hunt's office stated at the time: "The Australian government will continue to actively participate in shark conservation under the convention as a signatory of the memorandum of understanding on the conservation of migratory sharks, and through $4.6m funding for shark research and conservation activities" [1][2].
澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 仍réng réng 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú CMSCMS CMS 公约gōng yuē gōng yuē 缔约方dì yuē fāng dì yuē fāng 身份shēn fèn shēn fèn 并bìng bìng 继续jì xù jì xù 积极参与jī jí cān yù jī jí cān yù 。。 。
The five species in question were: bigeye thresher, common thresher, pelagic thresher, scalloped hammerhead, and great hammerhead sharks [1].
正如zhèng rú zhèng rú 环境huán jìng huán jìng 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 格雷格gé léi gé gé léi gé ·· · 亨特hēng tè hēng tè 办公室bàn gōng shì bàn gōng shì 当时dāng shí dāng shí 所说suǒ shuō suǒ shuō :: : "" " 澳大利亚政府ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ 将jiāng jiāng 继续jì xù jì xù 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 鲨鱼shā yú shā yú 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 谅解liàng jiě liàng jiě 备忘录bèi wàng lù bèi wàng lù 的de de 签署qiān shǔ qiān shǔ 方fāng fāng 积极参与jī jí cān yù jī jí cān yù 公约gōng yuē gōng yuē 下xià xià 的de de 鲨鱼shā yú shā yú 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò ,, , 并bìng bìng 通过tōng guò tōng guò 460460 460 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 的de de 鲨鱼shā yú shā yú 研究yán jiū yán jiū 和hé hé 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 活动huó dòng huó dòng 资金zī jīn zī jīn 继续jì xù jì xù 参与cān yù cān yù "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
These were among 21 shark and ray species granted protected status at the CMS COP11 meeting [3].
涉及shè jí shè jí 的de de 五种wǔ zhǒng wǔ zhǒng 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 是shì shì :: : 大dà dà 眼yǎn yǎn 长尾zhǎng wěi zhǎng wěi 鲨shā shā 、、 、 普通pǔ tōng pǔ tōng 长尾zhǎng wěi zhǎng wěi 鲨shā shā 、、 、 浅海qiǎn hǎi qiǎn hǎi 长尾zhǎng wěi zhǎng wěi 鲨shā shā 、、 、 路氏lù shì lù shì 双髻shuāng jì shuāng jì 鲨shā shā 和hé hé 伟大wěi dà wěi dà 的de de 双髻shuāng jì shuāng jì 鲨shā shā [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 是shì shì 在zài zài CMSCMS CMS COP11COP11 COP11 会议huì yì huì yì 上shàng shàng 获得huò dé huò dé 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 地位dì wèi dì wèi 的de de 2121 21 种zhǒng zhǒng 鲨鱼shā yú shā yú 和hé hé 鳐yáo yáo 鱼yú yú 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 中zhōng zhōng 的de de 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。

缺失背景

该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 信息xìn xī xìn xī :: :
The claim omits several critical pieces of context: **1.
** * ** * 11 1 .. . 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 的de de 声明shēng míng shēng míng 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu :: : ** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 解释jiě shì jiě shì 称chēng chēng ,, , 保留条款bǎo liú tiáo kuǎn bǎo liú tiáo kuǎn 是shì shì 为了wèi le wèi le 避免bì miǎn bì miǎn 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 渔民yú mín yú mín 面临miàn lín miàn lín "" " 意外yì wài yì wài 后果hòu guǒ hòu guǒ "" " ,, , 他们tā men tā men 根据gēn jù gēn jù 国际guó jì guó jì 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 可能kě néng kě néng 面临miàn lín miàn lín 高达gāo dá gāo dá 1717 17 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 的de de 罚款fá kuǎn fá kuǎn 和hé hé 两年liǎng nián liǎng nián 监禁jiān jìn jiān jìn ,, , 即使jí shǐ jí shǐ 他们tā men tā men 根据gēn jù gēn jù 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 许可证xǔ kě zhèng xǔ kě zhèng 合法hé fǎ hé fǎ 捕鱼bǔ yú bǔ yú [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
Australia's stated rationale:** The government explained the reservation was necessary to avoid "unintended consequences" for Australian fishers, who could face fines up to $170,000 and two years imprisonment under the international protections, even if they were fishing legally under Australian permits [1].
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 坚称jiān chēng jiān chēng 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 已yǐ yǐ 对duì duì 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 实施shí shī shí shī 了le le 有效yǒu xiào yǒu xiào 的de de 国内guó nèi guó nèi 保护措施bǎo hù cuò shī bǎo hù cuò shī 。。 。
The government maintained that Australia already had effective domestic protections in place for these species. **2.
** * ** * 22 2 .. . 国内guó nèi guó nèi 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià :: : ** * ** * 当时dāng shí dāng shí 双髻shuāng jì shuāng jì 鲨shā shā 和hé hé 长尾zhǎng wěi zhǎng wěi 鲨shā shā 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 均jūn jūn 未wèi wèi 根据gēn jù gēn jù 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 《《 《 环境保护huán jìng bǎo hù huán jìng bǎo hù 与yǔ yǔ 生物shēng wù shēng wù 多样性duō yàng xìng duō yàng xìng 保护法bǎo hù fǎ bǎo hù fǎ 》》 》 (( ( EPBCEPBC EPBC 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn )) ) 被bèi bèi 列为liè wèi liè wèi 受shòu shòu 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
Domestic legal framework:** Neither the hammerhead nor thresher species were listed as threatened under Australia's Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act at the time [1].
新南威尔士州xīn nán wēi ěr shì zhōu xīn nán wēi ěr shì zhōu 已yǐ yǐ 通过tōng guò tōng guò 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 州zhōu zhōu 水域shuǐ yù shuǐ yù 内nèi nèi 的de de 双髻shuāng jì shuāng jì 鲨shā shā [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] ,, , 联邦政府lián bāng zhèng fǔ lián bāng zhèng fǔ 正在zhèng zài zhèng zài 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 研究yán jiū yán jiū 评估píng gū píng gū 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 应yīng yīng 将jiāng jiāng 双髻shuāng jì shuāng jì 鲨shā shā 变种biàn zhǒng biàn zhǒng 列为liè wèi liè wèi 国家guó jiā guó jiā 受shòu shòu 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
New South Wales had already passed legislation protecting hammerhead sharks in state waters [1], and the federal government was conducting studies to assess whether hammerhead variants should be nationally listed as threatened [1]. **3.
** * ** * 33 3 .. . 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 鲨鱼shā yú shā yú 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò :: : ** * ** * 在zài zài 提出tí chū tí chū 保留条款bǎo liú tiáo kuǎn bǎo liú tiáo kuǎn 时shí shí ,, , 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 已yǐ yǐ 制定zhì dìng zhì dìng "" " 鲨鱼shā yú shā yú 计划jì huà jì huà 22 2 "" " (( ( 第二份dì èr fèn dì èr fèn 国家guó jiā guó jiā 鲨鱼shā yú shā yú 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 与yǔ yǔ 管理guǎn lǐ guǎn lǐ 行动计划xíng dòng jì huà xíng dòng jì huà )) ) ,, , 该gāi gāi 计划jì huà jì huà 于yú yú 20122012 2012 年nián nián 77 7 月yuè yuè 在zài zài 前qián qián 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 下xià xià 发布fā bù fā bù ,, , 并bìng bìng 重申chóng shēn chóng shēn 了le le 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 对duì duì 鲨鱼shā yú shā yú 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 的de de 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
Australia's broader shark conservation commitments:** At the time of the reservation, Australia had Shark-plan 2 (the second National Plan of Action for the Conservation and Management of Sharks), which was released in July 2012 under the previous Labor government and reaffirmed Australia's commitment to shark conservation [4].
该gāi gāi 计划jì huà jì huà 明确míng què míng què 了le le 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 将jiāng jiāng 如何rú hé rú hé 管理guǎn lǐ guǎn lǐ 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 鲨鱼shā yú shā yú ,, , 同时tóng shí tóng shí 履行lǚ xíng lǚ xíng 国际guó jì guó jì 义务yì wù yì wù 。。 。
The plan identified how Australia would manage and conserve sharks while meeting international obligations. **4.
** * ** * 44 4 .. . 渔业yú yè yú yè 游说yóu shuì yóu shuì 团体tuán tǐ tuán tǐ 的de de 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng :: : ** * ** * 《《 《 卫报wèi bào wèi bào 》》 》 20152015 2015 年nián nián 44 4 月yuè yuè 获得huò dé huò dé 的de de 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì ,, , 休闲xiū xián xiū xián 渔业yú yè yú yè 界jiè jiè 的de de 担忧dān yōu dān yōu 对duì duì 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 决策jué cè jué cè 产生chǎn shēng chǎn shēng 了le le 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng ,, , 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 国家guó jiā guó jiā 垂钓chuí diào chuí diào 协会xié huì xié huì 的de de 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn 在zài zài 提交tí jiāo tí jiāo 给gěi gěi 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 的de de 部门bù mén bù mén 简报jiǎn bào jiǎn bào 中zhōng zhōng 占据zhàn jù zhàn jù 突出位置tū chū wèi zhì tū chū wèi zhì ,, , 而ér ér CSIROCSIRO CSIRO 等děng děng 科学kē xué kē xué 机构jī gòu jī gòu 和hé hé 环保huán bǎo huán bǎo 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 的de de 担忧dān yōu dān yōu 则zé zé 未wèi wèi 被bèi bèi 纳入nà rù nà rù [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
Influence of fishing lobby:** Documents obtained by The Guardian in April 2015 revealed that the recreational fishing industry's concerns held significant sway over the government's decision, with the Australian National Sportfishing Association's views prominently featured in departmental briefings to the minister, while scientific agencies like CSIRO and conservation group concerns were not included [5].

来源可信度评估

原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán 为wèi wèi ** * ** * 《《 《 卫报wèi bào wèi bào 》》 》 ** * ** * ,, , 这是zhè shì zhè shì 一家yī jiā yī jiā 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 国际guó jì guó jì 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 机构jī gòu jī gòu ,, , 持有chí yǒu chí yǒu 中zhōng zhōng 左翼zuǒ yì zuǒ yì 的de de 编辑biān jí biān jí 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 。。 。
The original source provided is **The Guardian**, a mainstream international news organization with a center-left editorial stance.
该gāi gāi 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 由yóu yóu 奥利弗ào lì fú ào lì fú ·· · 米尔mǐ ěr mǐ ěr 曼màn màn 撰写zhuàn xiě zhuàn xiě ,, , 他tā tā 当时dāng shí dāng shí 担任dān rèn dān rèn 《《 《 卫报wèi bào wèi bào 》》 》 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 版bǎn bǎn 的de de 环境huán jìng huán jìng 记者jì zhě jì zhě 。。 。
The article was written by Oliver Milman, The Guardian Australia's environment correspondent at the time. **Assessment:** The Guardian is generally considered a reputable source with established journalistic standards.
** * ** * 评估píng gū píng gū :: : ** * ** * 《《 《 卫报wèi bào wèi bào 》》 》 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 被bèi bèi 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 是shì shì 一家yī jiā yī jiā 信誉xìn yù xìn yù 良好liáng hǎo liáng hǎo 的de de 来源lái yuán lái yuán ,, , 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 既定jì dìng jì dìng 的de de 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 。。 。
However, the original article's headline uses the phrase "seeks to opt out," which while technically accurate regarding the specific species, could be misinterpreted as broader non-compliance.
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 的de de 标题biāo tí biāo tí 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 了le le "" " 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 退出tuì chū tuì chū "" " 的de de 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù ,, , 虽然suī rán suī rán 从技术上cóng jì shù shàng cóng jì shù shàng 讲jiǎng jiǎng 对duì duì 特定tè dìng tè dìng 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 是shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de ,, , 但dàn dàn 可能kě néng kě néng 被bèi bèi 误解wù jiě wù jiě 为wèi wèi 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 不bù bù 合规hé guī hé guī 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi 。。 。
The article itself accurately describes the "reservation" mechanism and provides both the government's justification and conservationist criticism, demonstrating reasonable balance in reporting [1].
文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 本身běn shēn běn shēn 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 描述miáo shù miáo shù 了le le "" " 保留条款bǎo liú tiáo kuǎn bǎo liú tiáo kuǎn "" " 机制jī zhì jī zhì ,, , 并bìng bìng 同时tóng shí tóng shí 提供tí gōng tí gōng 了le le 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 和hé hé 环保主义者huán bǎo zhǔ yì zhě huán bǎo zhǔ yì zhě 的de de 批评pī píng pī píng ,, , 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì 出chū chū 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 的de de 报道bào dào bào dào 平衡píng héng píng héng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The claim source (mdavis.xyz) is Labor-aligned, which may explain the misleading framing that overstates the nature of Australia's action as a "withdrawal from a convention" rather than a targeted reservation on specific species listings.
该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 的de de 来源lái yuán lái yuán (( ( mdavismdavis mdavis .. . xyzxyz xyz )) ) 倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng ,, , 这zhè zhè 可能kě néng kě néng 解释jiě shì jiě shì 了le le 其qí qí 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià ,, , 将jiāng jiāng 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 的de de 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 夸大kuā dà kuā dà 为wèi wèi "" " 退出tuì chū tuì chū 公约gōng yuē gōng yuē "" " ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 特定tè dìng tè dìng 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 名单míng dān míng dān 的de de 保留条款bǎo liú tiáo kuǎn bǎo liú tiáo kuǎn 。。 。
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做过zuò guò zuò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng ?? ?
**Did Labor do something similar?** Search conducted: "Labor government shark conservation policy CMS convention reservation" **Finding:** While there is no direct equivalent of lodging a reservation against CMS listings under Labor, both major parties have faced criticism over shark conservation and management policies: 1. **Shark-plan 2 was released under Labor:** The National Plan of Action for Sharks (Shark-plan 2) was released in July 2012 under the Gillard Labor government [4], establishing the framework that the Coalition government cited when justifying its reservation.
** * ** *
This demonstrates bipartisan support for the domestic regulatory approach. 2. **Shark culling policies:** A 2017 Senate inquiry into shark mitigation and deterrent measures found that both the Coalition and Labor submitted dissenting reports when the majority recommended reforms to lethal shark control programs [6].
搜索sōu suǒ sōu suǒ 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng :: : "" " 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 鲨鱼shā yú shā yú 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè CMSCMS CMS 公约gōng yuē gōng yuē 保留条款bǎo liú tiáo kuǎn bǎo liú tiáo kuǎn "" "
Labor Senators condemned Western Australia's 2014 shark cull trial as "absurd" but both parties have historically supported shark mitigation programs that conservationists criticize [6]. 3. **Broader environmental pattern:** This is **not unique to the Coalition** - Australian governments of both persuasions have sometimes prioritized economic interests (fishing, tourism) over stricter international conservation measures.
** * ** * 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn :: : ** * ** * 虽然suī rán suī rán 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 期间qī jiān qī jiān 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì CMSCMS CMS 名单míng dān míng dān 提出tí chū tí chū 保留条款bǎo liú tiáo kuǎn bǎo liú tiáo kuǎn 的de de 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 等同děng tóng děng tóng 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi ,, , 但dàn dàn 两大liǎng dà liǎng dà 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 在zài zài 鲨鱼shā yú shā yú 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 和hé hé 管理guǎn lǐ guǎn lǐ 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 都dōu dōu 面临miàn lín miàn lín 过guò guò 批评pī píng pī píng :: :
Both parties have balanced commercial fishing industry concerns with environmental obligations. **Conclusion:** The specific action of lodging a CMS reservation was a Coalition government decision in 2015, but the underlying tension between fishing industry interests and conservation obligations has been managed by both parties, with Labor establishing the domestic framework the Coalition later relied upon.
11 1 .. . ** * ** * "" " 鲨鱼shā yú shā yú 计划jì huà jì huà 22 2 "" " 在zài zài 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 下xià xià 发布fā bù fā bù :: : ** * ** * 《《 《 国家guó jiā guó jiā 鲨鱼shā yú shā yú 行动计划xíng dòng jì huà xíng dòng jì huà 》》 》 (( ( 鲨鱼shā yú shā yú 计划jì huà jì huà 22 2 )) ) 于yú yú 20122012 2012 年nián nián 77 7 月yuè yuè 在zài zài 朱zhū zhū 莉娅lì yà lì yà ·· · 吉拉德jí lā dé jí lā dé 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 下xià xià 发布fā bù fā bù [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] ,, , 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì 了le le 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 为wèi wèi 其qí qí 保留条款bǎo liú tiáo kuǎn bǎo liú tiáo kuǎn 辩护biàn hù biàn hù 时所shí suǒ shí suǒ 依赖yī lài yī lài 的de de 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 。。 。
这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 对duì duì 国内guó nèi guó nèi 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 方法fāng fǎ fāng fǎ 的de de 支持zhī chí zhī chí 。。 。
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 鲨鱼shā yú shā yú 捕杀bǔ shā bǔ shā 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè :: : ** * ** * 20172017 2017 年nián nián 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 对duì duì 鲨鱼shā yú shā yú 缓解huǎn jiě huǎn jiě 和hé hé 威慑wēi shè wēi shè 措施cuò shī cuò shī 的de de 调查diào chá diào chá 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn ,, , 当dāng dāng 多数duō shù duō shù 意见建议yì jiàn jiàn yì yì jiàn jiàn yì 对duì duì 致命zhì mìng zhì mìng 鲨鱼shā yú shā yú 控制kòng zhì kòng zhì 计划jì huà jì huà 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 时shí shí ,, , 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 和hé hé 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 都dōu dōu 提交tí jiāo tí jiāo 了le le 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 报告bào gào bào gào [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán 谴责qiǎn zé qiǎn zé 西澳大利亚xī ào dà lì yà xī ào dà lì yà 州zhōu zhōu 20142014 2014 年nián nián 的de de 鲨鱼shā yú shā yú 捕杀bǔ shā bǔ shā 试验shì yàn shì yàn "" " 荒谬huāng miù huāng miù "" " ,, , 但dàn dàn 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ 上shàng shàng 都dōu dōu 支持zhī chí zhī chí 环保主义者huán bǎo zhǔ yì zhě huán bǎo zhǔ yì zhě 批评pī píng pī píng 的de de 鲨鱼shā yú shā yú 缓解huǎn jiě huǎn jiě 计划jì huà jì huà [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 环境huán jìng huán jìng 模式mó shì mó shì :: : ** * ** * 这zhè zhè ** * ** * 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu ** * ** * —— — —— — 无论是wú lùn shì wú lùn shì 哪个nǎ ge nǎ ge 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 的de de 澳大利亚政府ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ ,, , 有时yǒu shí yǒu shí 都dōu dōu 会huì huì 将jiāng jiāng 经济jīng jì jīng jì 利益lì yì lì yì (( ( 渔业yú yè yú yè 、、 、 旅游业lǚ yóu yè lǚ yóu yè )) ) 置于zhì yú zhì yú 更gèng gèng 严格yán gé yán gé 的de de 国际guó jì guó jì 保护措施bǎo hù cuò shī bǎo hù cuò shī 之上zhī shàng zhī shàng 。。 。
两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 都dōu dōu 平衡píng héng píng héng 了le le 商业shāng yè shāng yè 渔业yú yè yú yè 界jiè jiè 的de de 担忧dān yōu dān yōu 与yǔ yǔ 环境huán jìng huán jìng 义务yì wù yì wù 。。 。
** * ** * 结论jié lùn jié lùn :: : ** * ** * 提出tí chū tí chū CMSCMS CMS 保留条款bǎo liú tiáo kuǎn bǎo liú tiáo kuǎn 的de de 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi 是shì shì 20152015 2015 年nián nián 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 决定jué dìng jué dìng ,, , 但dàn dàn 渔业yú yè yú yè 界jiè jiè 利益lì yì lì yì 与yǔ yǔ 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 义务yì wù yì wù 之间zhī jiān zhī jiān 的de de 根本矛盾gēn běn máo dùn gēn běn máo dùn 一直yì zhí yì zhí 由yóu yóu 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 共同gòng tóng gòng tóng 管理guǎn lǐ guǎn lǐ ,, , 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì 了le le 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 后来hòu lái hòu lái 依赖yī lài yī lài 的de de 国内guó nèi guó nèi 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

虽然suī rán suī rán 国际guó jì guó jì 人rén rén 道dào dào 协会xié huì xié huì 等děng děng 环保huán bǎo huán bǎo 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 称该chēng gāi chēng gāi 保留条款bǎo liú tiáo kuǎn bǎo liú tiáo kuǎn 是shì shì "" " 前所未有qián suǒ wèi yǒu qián suǒ wèi yǒu 的de de 国内外guó nèi wài guó nèi wài 环境huán jìng huán jìng 破坏pò huài pò huài 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] ,, , 但dàn dàn 完整wán zhěng wán zhěng 的de de 故事gù shì gù shì 需要xū yào xū yào 同时tóng shí tóng shí 考虑kǎo lǜ kǎo lǜ 批评pī píng pī píng 意见yì jiàn yì jiàn 和hé hé 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 声明shēng míng shēng míng 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 。。 。
While conservation groups like Humane Society International called the reservation an "unprecedented act of domestic and international environmental vandalism" [1], the full story requires consideration of both the criticisms and the government's stated rationale. **Legitimate criticisms:** - Australia had not made such a reservation against CMS species listings before, making this a concerning precedent [1] - Documents revealed fishing industry concerns were prioritized over scientific and conservation advice in departmental briefings [5] - The reservation contradicted the precautionary principle of safeguarding wildlife when data is uncertain [5] - Hammerhead sharks migrate between Australian and Indonesian waters, requiring international cooperation [1] **Government justification:** - The reservation protected recreational fishers from potential criminal penalties ($170,000 fines, 2 years imprisonment) for catching sharks that were legal under Australian permits [1] - Australia maintained that domestic protections were already effective for these species - The government continued broader shark conservation commitments through the Sharks MoU and $4.6M in research funding [1][2] - Neither species was listed as threatened under Australia's EPBC Act at the time [1] **Key context:** The claim's framing as "withdrawing from a UN convention" is **misleading**.
** * ** * 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 的de de 批评pī píng pī píng :: : ** * ** *
Australia made a targeted reservation on 5 specific species while remaining fully engaged with the CMS convention.
-- - 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 此前cǐ qián cǐ qián 从未cóng wèi cóng wèi 对duì duì CMSCMS CMS 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 名单míng dān míng dān 提出tí chū tí chū 过guò guò 保留条款bǎo liú tiáo kuǎn bǎo liú tiáo kuǎn ,, , 这zhè zhè 开创kāi chuàng kāi chuàng 了le le 令人担忧lìng rén dān yōu lìng rén dān yōu 的de de 先例xiān lì xiān lì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
This is materially different from withdrawing from an entire convention.
-- - 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì ,, , 渔业yú yè yú yè 界jiè jiè 的de de 担忧dān yōu dān yōu 在zài zài 部门bù mén bù mén 简报jiǎn bào jiǎn bào 中zhōng zhōng 被bèi bèi 优先yōu xiān yōu xiān 于yú yú 科学kē xué kē xué 和hé hé 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
The "2 months after agreeing" framing is also misleading - Australia did not actively vote against the listings in November 2014, but chose not to object while reserving the right to lodge a reservation before implementation.
-- - 该gāi gāi 保留条款bǎo liú tiáo kuǎn bǎo liú tiáo kuǎn 违背wéi bèi wéi bèi 了le le 在zài zài 数据shù jù shù jù 不bù bù 确定què dìng què dìng 时shí shí 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 野生动物yě shēng dòng wù yě shēng dòng wù 的de de 预防yù fáng yù fáng 原则yuán zé yuán zé [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
-- - 双髻shuāng jì shuāng jì 鲨shā shā 在zài zài 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 和hé hé 印度尼西亚yìn dù ní xī yà yìn dù ní xī yà 水域shuǐ yù shuǐ yù 之间zhī jiān zhī jiān 迁徙qiān xǐ qiān xǐ ,, , 需要xū yào xū yào 国际guó jì guó jì 合作hé zuò hé zuò [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu :: : ** * ** *
-- - 该gāi gāi 保留条款bǎo liú tiáo kuǎn bǎo liú tiáo kuǎn 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 休闲xiū xián xiū xián 渔民yú mín yú mín 不会bú huì bú huì 因yīn yīn 捕获bǔ huò bǔ huò 根据gēn jù gēn jù 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 许可证xǔ kě zhèng xǔ kě zhèng 合法hé fǎ hé fǎ 的de de 鲨鱼shā yú shā yú 而ér ér 面临miàn lín miàn lín 潜在qián zài qián zài 的de de 刑事xíng shì xíng shì 处罚chǔ fá chǔ fá (( ( 1717 17 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 罚款fá kuǎn fá kuǎn 、、 、 两年liǎng nián liǎng nián 监禁jiān jìn jiān jìn )) ) [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
-- - 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 坚称jiān chēng jiān chēng 国内guó nèi guó nèi 保护措施bǎo hù cuò shī bǎo hù cuò shī 已yǐ yǐ 对duì duì 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 有效yǒu xiào yǒu xiào
-- - 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 通过tōng guò tōng guò 鲨鱼shā yú shā yú 谅解liàng jiě liàng jiě 备忘录bèi wàng lù bèi wàng lù 和hé hé 460460 460 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 研究yán jiū yán jiū 资金zī jīn zī jīn 继续jì xù jì xù 履行lǚ xíng lǚ xíng 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 鲨鱼shā yú shā yú 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
-- - 当时dāng shí dāng shí 这zhè zhè 两种liǎng zhǒng liǎng zhǒng 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 均jūn jūn 未wèi wèi 根据gēn jù gēn jù 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà EPBCEPBC EPBC 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 被bèi bèi 列为liè wèi liè wèi 受shòu shòu 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng :: : ** * ** * 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 将jiāng jiāng "" " 退出tuì chū tuì chū 联合国lián hé guó lián hé guó 公约gōng yuē gōng yuē "" " 的de de 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 是shì shì ** * ** * 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng 的de de ** * ** * 。。 。
澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 对duì duì 55 5 种zhǒng zhǒng 特定tè dìng tè dìng 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 提出tí chū tí chū 了le le 针对性zhēn duì xìng zhēn duì xìng 保留条款bǎo liú tiáo kuǎn bǎo liú tiáo kuǎn ,, , 同时tóng shí tóng shí 仍réng réng 全面quán miàn quán miàn 参与cān yù cān yù CMSCMS CMS 公约gōng yuē gōng yuē 。。 。
这zhè zhè 与yǔ yǔ 退出tuì chū tuì chū 整个zhěng gè zhěng gè 公约gōng yuē gōng yuē 有着yǒu zhe yǒu zhe 实质性shí zhì xìng shí zhì xìng 区别qū bié qū bié 。。 。
"" " 同意tóng yì tóng yì 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 月yuè yuè 后hòu hòu "" " 的de de 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 也yě yě 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng —— — —— — 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 在zài zài 20142014 2014 年nián nián 1111 11 月yuè yuè 积极jī jí jī jí 投票tóu piào tóu piào 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 名单míng dān míng dān ,, , 而是ér shì ér shì 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 在zài zài 实施shí shī shí shī 前qián qián 提出tí chū tí chū 保留条款bǎo liú tiáo kuǎn bǎo liú tiáo kuǎn 的de de 权利quán lì quán lì 。。 。

具有误导性

4.0

/ 10

该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 在zài zài 其qí qí 核心hé xīn hé xīn 定性dìng xìng dìng xìng 上shàng shàng 存在cún zài cún zài 事实shì shí shì shí 错误cuò wù cuò wù 。。 。
The claim is factually inaccurate in its core characterization.
澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi "" " 退出tuì chū tuì chū 联合国lián hé guó lián hé guó 公约gōng yuē gōng yuē "" " —— — —— — 它tā tā 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 五种wǔ zhǒng wǔ zhǒng 特定tè dìng tè dìng 鲨鱼shā yú shā yú 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 的de de 名单míng dān míng dān 提出tí chū tí chū 了le le 保留条款bǎo liú tiáo kuǎn bǎo liú tiáo kuǎn ,, , 同时tóng shí tóng shí 仍réng réng 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 《《 《 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 迁徙qiān xǐ qiān xǐ 野生动物yě shēng dòng wù yě shēng dòng wù 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 公约gōng yuē gōng yuē 》》 》 缔约方dì yuē fāng dì yuē fāng 身份shēn fèn shēn fèn ,, , 并bìng bìng 继续jì xù jì xù 履行lǚ xíng lǚ xíng 其qí qí 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 鲨鱼shā yú shā yú 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
Australia did not "withdraw from a UN convention" - it lodged a reservation against five specific shark species listings while remaining a signatory to the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species and continuing its broader shark conservation commitments [1][2].
"" " 同意tóng yì tóng yì 公约gōng yuē gōng yuē 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 月yuè yuè 后hòu hòu "" " 的de de 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 也yě yě 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng —— — —— — 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 自zì zì 19911991 1991 年nián nián 以来yǐ lái yǐ lái 一直yì zhí yì zhí 是shì shì CMSCMS CMS 公约gōng yuē gōng yuē 的de de 缔约方dì yuē fāng dì yuē fāng ,, , 20142014 2014 年nián nián 1111 11 月yuè yuè 的de de 会议huì yì huì yì 是shì shì 关于guān yú guān yú 特定tè dìng tè dìng 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 名单míng dān míng dān ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 加入jiā rù jiā rù 公约gōng yuē gōng yuē 本身běn shēn běn shēn 。。 。
The "2 months after agreeing to the convention" framing is also misleading - Australia had been party to the CMS convention since 1991, and the November 2014 meeting was about specific species listings, not joining the convention itself.
虽然suī rán suī rán 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 试图shì tú shì tú 避免bì miǎn bì miǎn 特定tè dìng tè dìng 鲨鱼shā yú shā yú 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 这一zhè yī zhè yī 基本jī běn jī běn 事实shì shí shì shí 是shì shì 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 的de de ,, , 但dàn dàn 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 的de de 定性dìng xìng dìng xìng 夸大kuā dà kuā dà 并bìng bìng 歪曲wāi qū wāi qū 了le le 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 的de de 性质xìng zhì xìng zhì 和hé hé 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi 。。 。
While the underlying fact that Australia sought to avoid protections for specific shark species is true, the claim's characterization exaggerates and misrepresents the nature and scope of the government's action.

📚 来源与引用 (7)

  1. 1
    Australian government seeks to opt out of protection of five shark species

    Australian government seeks to opt out of protection of five shark species

    Exclusive: Thresher and hammerhead sharks listed as protected migratory species under UN convention in November

    the Guardian
  2. 2
    Australian Government Seeks to Opt Out of Protection of Five Shark Species

    Australian Government Seeks to Opt Out of Protection of Five Shark Species

    Join the PADI AWARE Conservation Action Portal to remove marine debris, protect ocean life, and drive change through citizen science and global action.

    PADI
  3. 3
    Clean Sweep For Sharks And Rays At CMS CoP11

    Clean Sweep For Sharks And Rays At CMS CoP11

    Parties from the UN conservation convention unanimously vote 21 species of threatened sharks and rays into the appendices of CMS

    Scubaverse
  4. 4
    PDF

    Shark Conservation and Management in Australia

    Cms • PDF Document
  5. 5
    Fishing lobby pushed Australia to opt out of protection of five shark species

    Fishing lobby pushed Australia to opt out of protection of five shark species

    Documents reveal the recreational fishing industry’s concerns held more sway over the government’s decision than scientific or conservation advice

    the Guardian
  6. 6
    Shark culls condemned in 2017 Senate inquiry — yet major parties continue to back even deadlier programs

    Shark culls condemned in 2017 Senate inquiry — yet major parties continue to back even deadlier programs

    In 2017, a Senate committee delivered what should have been a watershed moment in Australian environmental policy: a clear, evidence-based recommendation to end lethal shark control programs in New South Wales and Queensland.The inquiry’s findings were unambiguous. It concluded that the use of shark nets and lethal drumlines had no proven public safety benefit, caused significant ecological damage, and operated outside the scope of modern environmental assessment. The committee urged both states

    Envoy Foundation
  7. 7
    Claude Code

    Claude Code

    Claude Code is an agentic AI coding tool that understands your entire codebase. Edit files, run commands, debug issues, and ship faster—directly from your terminal, IDE, Slack or on the web.

    AI coding agent for terminal & IDE | Claude

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。