部分属实

评分: 6.0/10

Coalition
C0558

声明内容

“斥资400万澳元建立'澳大利亚共识中心',这是一个气候否认中心,由一位没有科学或经济学资质的人运营。政府此前已以资金不足为由削减了对澳大利亚气候委员会的所有拨款。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis

原始来源

事实核查

gāi gāi 言论yán lùn yán lùn de de 核心hé xīn hé xīn 事实shì shí shì shí 要素yào sù yào sù 大体上dà tǐ shàng dà tǐ shàng ** * ** * 核实hé shí hé shí ** * ** * 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 某些mǒu xiē mǒu xiē 描述miáo shù miáo shù 需要xū yào xū yào 澄清chéng qīng chéng qīng
The core factual elements of this claim are largely **verified**, though some characterizations require clarification. **The $4 million funding:** The Coalition government did pledge $4 million to establish the "Australian Consensus Centre" at the University of Western Australia (UWA), intended to be an Australian arm of Bjorn Lomborg's Copenhagen Consensus Center [1][2].
** * ** * 400400 400 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn ** * ** * 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 400400 400 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán zài zài 西澳大利亚xī ào dà lì yà xī ào dà lì yà 大学dà xué dà xué UWAUWA UWA 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì "" " 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 共识gòng shí gòng shí 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn "" " 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 比约bǐ yuē bǐ yuē ēn ēn ·· · lóng lóng 伯格bó gé bó gé 哥本哈根gē běn hā gēn gē běn hā gēn 共识gòng shí gòng shí 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn de de 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 分支fēn zhī fēn zhī [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
The funding was a direct government grant, not a competitive research grant. **Bjorn Lomborg's qualifications:** Lomborg holds a Ph.D. in political science from the University of Copenhagen [3].
gāi gāi 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn shì shì 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 资助zī zhù zī zhù ér ér fēi fēi 竞争性jìng zhēng xìng jìng zhēng xìng 研究yán jiū yán jiū 资助zī zhù zī zhù
The claim that he has "no qualifications in science or economics" is **technically accurate** - he is not a natural scientist (physics, chemistry, climate science) nor an economist by formal training.
** * ** * 比约bǐ yuē bǐ yuē ēn ēn ·· · lóng lóng 伯格bó gé bó gé de de 资质zī zhì zī zhì ** * ** * lóng lóng 伯格bó gé bó gé 拥有yōng yǒu yōng yǒu 哥本哈根大学gē běn hā gēn dà xué gē běn hā gēn dà xué 政治学zhèng zhì xué zhèng zhì xué 博士学位bó shì xué wèi bó shì xué wèi [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
However, he is a political scientist and statistician who has written extensively on environmental economics and cost-benefit analysis.
gāi gāi 言论yán lùn yán lùn 称其chēng qí chēng qí "" " 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 科学kē xué kē xué huò huò 经济学jīng jì xué jīng jì xué 资质zī zhì zī zhì "" " zài zài ** * ** * 技术jì shù jì shù shàng shàng 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què ** * ** * 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 自然科学zì rán kē xué zì rán kē xué 物理wù lǐ wù lǐ 化学huà xué huà xué 气候qì hòu qì hòu 科学kē xué kē xué 领域lǐng yù lǐng yù de de 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā wèi wèi 接受jiē shòu jiē shòu guò guò 正规zhèng guī zhèng guī 经济学jīng jì xué jīng jì xué 培训péi xùn péi xùn
UWA Academic Staff Association vice president Professor Stuart Bunt noted: "Lomborg is not a climate [change] denier; he believes the scientific evidence which overwhelmingly shows that climate change is happening, he just debates the economics of how we should deal with it...
然而rán ér rán ér shì shì 一位yī wèi yī wèi 政治学家zhèng zhì xué jiā zhèng zhì xué jiā 统计学家tǒng jì xué jiā tǒng jì xué jiā 撰写zhuàn xiě zhuàn xiě le le 大量dà liàng dà liàng 关于guān yú guān yú 环境huán jìng huán jìng 经济学jīng jì xué jīng jì xué 成本chéng běn chéng běn 效益xiào yì xiào yì 分析fēn xī fēn xī de de 著作zhù zuò zhù zuò
The difficulty is he is neither a scientist or an economist, he's a political scientist" [1]. **Climate Commission cuts:** The Abbott government did abolish the Climate Commission in September 2013, shortly after taking office.
西澳xī ào xī ào 大学dà xué dà xué 学术xué shù xué shù 员工yuán gōng yuán gōng 协会xié huì xié huì 主席zhǔ xí zhǔ xí 斯图尔特sī tú ěr tè sī tú ěr tè ·· · 邦特bāng tè bāng tè 教授jiào shòu jiào shòu 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū "" " lóng lóng 伯格bó gé bó gé 不是bú shì bú shì 气候qì hòu qì hòu [[ [ 变化biàn huà biàn huà ]] ] 否认fǒu rèn fǒu rèn zhě zhě 相信xiāng xìn xiāng xìn 科学kē xué kē xué 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 压倒性yā dǎo xìng yā dǎo xìng 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 气候变化qì hòu biàn huà qì hòu biàn huà 正在zhèng zài zhèng zài 发生fā shēng fā shēng 只是zhǐ shì zhǐ shì 辩论biàn lùn biàn lùn 我们wǒ men wǒ men 应该yīng gāi yīng gāi 如何rú hé rú hé 应对yìng duì yìng duì de de 气候qì hòu qì hòu 经济学jīng jì xué jīng jì xué 问题wèn tí wèn tí 在于zài yú zài yú 不是bú shì bú shì 科学家kē xué jiā kē xué jiā 不是bú shì bú shì 经济学家jīng jì xué jiā jīng jì xué jiā shì shì 一位yī wèi yī wèi 政治学家zhèng zhì xué jiā zhèng zhì xué jiā "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The Commission, established under the previous Labor government and headed by Tim Flannery, was disbanded as part of the government's efforts to reduce budget expenditure [4]. **"Climate denial center" characterization:** This characterization is **misleading**.
** * ** * 气候qì hòu qì hòu 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn ** * ** * 阿博特ā bó tè ā bó tè 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí zài zài 20132013 2013 nián nián 99 9 yuè yuè 上台shàng tái shàng tái hòu hòu 不久bù jiǔ bù jiǔ 废除fèi chú fèi chú le le 气候qì hòu qì hòu 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì
Lomborg is not a climate denier who rejects the science of anthropogenic climate change.
gāi gāi 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 由前yóu qián yóu qián 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 设立shè lì shè lì yóu yóu 蒂姆dì mǔ dì mǔ ·· · 弗兰纳里fú lán nà lǐ fú lán nà lǐ 领导lǐng dǎo lǐng dǎo 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 预算yù suàn yù suàn 支出zhī chū zhī chū de de 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn bèi bèi 解散jiě sàn jiě sàn [[ [ 44 4 ]] ]
Rather, he is best described as a "climate contrarian" or "delayer" who argues that while climate change is real, it should be ranked lower on global priorities compared to issues like poverty, disease, and education [1][3].
** * ** * "" " 气候qì hòu qì hòu 否认fǒu rèn fǒu rèn 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn "" " de de 描述miáo shù miáo shù ** * ** * 这一zhè yī zhè yī 描述miáo shù miáo shù shì shì ** * ** * 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng de de ** * ** *
He advocates for limited climate action and questions the cost-effectiveness of aggressive emission reduction targets.
lóng lóng 伯格bó gé bó gé 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 否认fǒu rèn fǒu rèn 人为rén wéi rén wéi 气候变化qì hòu biàn huà qì hòu biàn huà de de 科学kē xué kē xué de de 气候qì hòu qì hòu 否认fǒu rèn fǒu rèn zhě zhě
Dr Frank Jotzo, a leading climate economist at ANU, stated the Copenhagen Consensus Center methodology "has no academic credibility" and accused the organization of filtering out dissenting voices [2].
gèng gèng 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 地说dì shuō dì shuō bèi bèi 描述miáo shù miáo shù wèi wèi "" " 气候qì hòu qì hòu 异议yì yì yì yì zhě zhě "" " huò huò "" " 拖延者tuō yán zhě tuō yán zhě "" " 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 虽然suī rán suī rán 气候变化qì hòu biàn huà qì hòu biàn huà shì shì 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí de de dàn dàn 贫困pín kùn pín kùn 疾病jí bìng jí bìng 教育jiào yù jiào yù děng děng 问题wèn tí wèn tí 相比xiāng bǐ xiāng bǐ zài zài 全球quán qiú quán qiú 优先yōu xiān yōu xiān 事项shì xiàng shì xiàng zhōng zhōng de de 排名pái míng pái míng 应该yīng gāi yīng gāi gèng gèng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 采取cǎi qǔ cǎi qǔ 有限yǒu xiàn yǒu xiàn de de 气候qì hòu qì hòu 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 质疑zhì yí zhì yí 激进jī jìn jī jìn de de 减排jiǎn pái jiǎn pái 目标mù biāo mù biāo de de 成本chéng běn chéng běn 效益xiào yì xiào yì
澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 国立大学guó lì dà xué guó lì dà xué 首席shǒu xí shǒu xí 气候qì hòu qì hòu 经济学家jīng jì xué jiā jīng jì xué jiā 弗兰克fú lán kè fú lán kè ·· · 乔佐qiáo zuǒ qiáo zuǒ 博士bó shì bó shì 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 哥本哈根gē běn hā gēn gē běn hā gēn 共识gòng shí gòng shí 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn de de 方法fāng fǎ fāng fǎ "" " 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 学术xué shù xué shù 可信度kě xìn dù kě xìn dù "" " bìng bìng 指责zhǐ zé zhǐ zé gāi gāi 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 过滤guò lǜ guò lǜ diào diào 不同bù tóng bù tóng 意见yì jiàn yì jiàn de de 声音shēng yīn shēng yīn [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]

缺失背景

gāi gāi 言论yán lùn yán lùn 忽略hū lüè hū lüè le le 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 要素yào sù yào sù
The claim omits several important contextual elements: **The centre was never actually established:** Due to significant backlash from UWA staff, students, and the broader academic community, UWA cancelled the contract in May 2015 and returned the $4 million to the government [1].
** * ** * gāi gāi 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn 从未cóng wèi cóng wèi 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì ** * ** * 由于yóu yú yóu yú 西澳xī ào xī ào 大学dà xué dà xué 教职员工jiào zhí yuán gōng jiào zhí yuán gōng 学生xué shēng xué shēng gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn de de 学术界xué shù jiè xué shù jiè de de 强烈qiáng liè qiáng liè 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 西澳xī ào xī ào 大学dà xué dà xué 20152015 2015 nián nián 55 5 yuè yuè 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo le le 合同hé tóng hé tóng bìng bìng jiāng jiāng 400400 400 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 返还fǎn huán fǎn huán gěi gěi 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The Vice Chancellor Paul Johnson cited "the scale of the strong and passionate emotional reaction" as making it impossible to deliver "value for money for Australian taxpayers" [1].
副校长fù xiào zhǎng fù xiào zhǎng 保罗bǎo luó bǎo luó ·· · 约翰逊yuē hàn xùn yuē hàn xùn chēng chēng "" " 强烈qiáng liè qiáng liè ér ér 充满chōng mǎn chōng mǎn 激情jī qíng jī qíng de de 情绪反应qíng xù fǎn yìng qíng xù fǎn yìng de de 规模guī mó guī mó 程度chéng dù chéng dù "" " 使得shǐ de shǐ de 无法wú fǎ wú fǎ wèi wèi "" " 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 纳税人nà shuì rén nà shuì rén 提供tí gōng tí gōng 物有所值wù yǒu suǒ zhí wù yǒu suǒ zhí de de 服务fú wù fú wù "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
Therefore, while the funding was pledged, the actual expenditure was minimal or nil. **The initiative originated from the Prime Minister's Office:** Reports indicated the idea for the centre came from the office of Prime Minister Tony Abbott, not from UWA or Lomborg approaching the government [2].
因此yīn cǐ yīn cǐ 虽然suī rán suī rán 资金zī jīn zī jīn 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò dàn dàn 实际shí jì shí jì 支出zhī chū zhī chū 微乎其微wēi hū qí wēi wēi hū qí wēi huò huò 根本gēn běn gēn běn 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu
UWA stated they were approached by the government to house the centre.
** * ** * gāi gāi 倡议chàng yì chàng yì 源自yuán zì yuán zì 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ 办公室bàn gōng shì bàn gōng shì ** * ** * 报道bào dào bào dào chēng chēng 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì gāi gāi 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn de de 想法xiǎng fǎ xiǎng fǎ 来自lái zì lái zì 托尼tuō ní tuō ní ·· · 阿博特ā bó tè ā bó tè 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ de de 办公室bàn gōng shì bàn gōng shì ér ér fēi fēi 西澳xī ào xī ào 大学dà xué dà xué 或隆huò lóng huò lóng 伯格bó gé bó gé 主动zhǔ dòng zhǔ dòng 接触jiē chù jiē chù 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
This suggests the funding was politically motivated from the outset. **No competitive process:** The $4 million was granted without any apparent competitive process, which drew criticism from academics who noted that research funding typically requires rigorous peer review [2]. **Lack of university co-funding:** UWA stated it was not providing any direct funding to the centre - the entire amount came from taxpayers [1]. **2014 science funding context:** The $4 million grant came after more than $400 million was slashed from science funding in the Government's 2014 budget [2], which amplified criticism about the government's priorities.
西澳xī ào xī ào 大学dà xué dà xué 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 他们tā men tā men shì shì bèi bèi 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 接洽jiē qià jiē qià lái lái 承办chéng bàn chéng bàn gāi gāi 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn de de
zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng gāi gāi 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn cóng cóng 开始kāi shǐ kāi shǐ jiù jiù 带有dài yǒu dài yǒu 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 动机dòng jī dòng jī
** * ** * 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 经过jīng guò jīng guò 竞争性jìng zhēng xìng jìng zhēng xìng 程序chéng xù chéng xù ** * ** * 400400 400 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán de de 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 任何rèn hé rèn hé 明显míng xiǎn míng xiǎn de de 竞争性jìng zhēng xìng jìng zhēng xìng 程序chéng xù chéng xù zhè zhè 引起yǐn qǐ yǐn qǐ le le 学者xué zhě xué zhě de de 批评pī píng pī píng 他们tā men tā men 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū 研究yán jiū yán jiū 资助zī zhù zī zhù 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 需要xū yào xū yào 严格yán gé yán gé de de 同行tóng háng tóng háng 评审píng shěn píng shěn [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
** * ** * 缺乏quē fá quē fá 大学dà xué dà xué 共同gòng tóng gòng tóng 资助zī zhù zī zhù ** * ** * 西澳xī ào xī ào 大学dà xué dà xué 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 他们tā men tā men 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu xiàng xiàng gāi gāi 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn 提供tí gōng tí gōng 任何rèn hé rèn hé 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 资金zī jīn zī jīn 全部quán bù quán bù 金额jīn é jīn é 来自lái zì lái zì 纳税人nà shuì rén nà shuì rén [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
** * ** * 20142014 2014 nián nián 科学kē xué kē xué 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ** * ** * 400400 400 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn shì shì zài zài 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 20142014 2014 nián nián 预算yù suàn yù suàn zhōng zhōng cóng cóng 科学kē xué kē xué 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn zhōng zhōng 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 超过chāo guò chāo guò 44 4 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 之后zhī hòu zhī hòu 做出zuò chū zuò chū de de [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] zhè zhè 加剧jiā jù jiā jù le le 人们rén men rén men duì duì 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 优先yōu xiān yōu xiān 事项shì xiàng shì xiàng de de 批评pī píng pī píng

来源可信度评估

原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán 来自lái zì lái zì ** * ** * NewNew New MatildaMatilda Matilda ** * ** * 一家yī jiā yī jiā 独立dú lì dú lì de de 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 机构jī gòu jī gòu
The original sources are from **New Matilda**, an independent Australian media outlet. **New Matilda** describes itself as independent journalism with a progressive perspective.
** * ** * NewNew New MatildaMatilda Matilda ** * ** * 自称zì chēng zì chēng 独立dú lì dú lì 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 带有dài yǒu dài yǒu 进步jìn bù jìn bù 视角shì jiǎo shì jiǎo
It is generally considered left-leaning and has published critical coverage of Coalition governments.
通常tōng cháng tōng cháng bèi bèi 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi shì shì 左翼zuǒ yì zuǒ yì 倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng de de céng céng 发表fā biǎo fā biǎo guò guò 批评pī píng pī píng 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ de de 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng
While not a mainstream outlet like ABC or SMH, it has broken legitimate stories and is not a "fake news" source.
虽然suī rán suī rán xiàng xiàng ABCABC ABC huò huò 悉尼xī ní xī ní 晨锋报chén fēng bào chén fēng bào 这样zhè yàng zhè yàng de de 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ dàn dàn céng céng 曝光bào guāng bào guāng guò guò legitimatelegitimate legitimate de de 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi "" " 假新闻jiǎ xīn wén jiǎ xīn wén "" " 来源lái yuán lái yuán
However, readers should be aware of its editorial perspective when assessing the framing of claims.
然而rán ér rán ér 读者dú zhě dú zhě zài zài 评估píng gū píng gū 言论yán lùn yán lùn de de 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 时应shí yīng shí yīng 注意zhù yì zhù yì 编辑biān jí biān jí 视角shì jiǎo shì jiǎo
The claim's sources do not include mainstream outlets like ABC News, The Guardian, or Fairfax media, which also covered this story extensively with similar factual reporting.
gāi gāi 言论yán lùn yán lùn de de 来源lái yuán lái yuán 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò ABCABC ABC 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 卫报wèi bào wèi bào huò huò 费尔法克斯fèi ěr fǎ kè sī fèi ěr fǎ kè sī 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ děng děng 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 类似lèi sì lèi sì de de 事实shì shí shì shí 报道bào dào bào dào 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 报道bào dào bào dào le le 此事cǐ shì cǐ shì
Cross-referencing with ABC News and other mainstream sources confirms the core facts [1][2].
ABCABC ABC 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 其他qí tā qí tā 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 来源lái yuán lái yuán de de 交叉jiāo chā jiāo chā 核实hé shí hé shí 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí le le 核心hé xīn hé xīn 事实shì shí shì shí [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做过zuò guò zuò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng
**Did Labor do something similar?** Search conducted: "Labor government think tank funding political climate policy Australia" **Finding:** Direct equivalents are difficult to find, as the specific circumstances of this case (government approaching a university to host a politically-aligned contrarian research centre with direct funding) appear unusual.
** * ** *
However, Labor governments have also faced criticism for politically-motivated funding decisions: 1. **Climate Commission itself:** The Climate Commission that the Abbott government abolished was itself established by the Rudd/Gillard Labor government in 2011 to provide "independent" information on climate change.
搜索sōu suǒ sōu suǒ 内容nèi róng nèi róng "" " LaborLabor Labor governmentgovernment government thinkthink think tanktank tank fundingfunding funding politicalpolitical political climateclimate climate policypolicy policy AustraliaAustralia Australia "" "
Critics at the time argued it was politically stacked with climate advocates [4].
** * ** * 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn ** * ** * 很难hěn nán hěn nán 找到zhǎo dào zhǎo dào 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 对应duì yìng duì yìng de de 例子lì zi lì zi 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi 本案běn àn běn àn de de 具体情况jù tǐ qíng kuàng jù tǐ qíng kuàng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 主动zhǔ dòng zhǔ dòng 联系lián xì lián xì 大学dà xué dà xué 承办chéng bàn chéng bàn 一个yí gè yí gè 带有dài yǒu dài yǒu 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 色彩sè cǎi sè cǎi de de 异议yì yì yì yì 研究yán jiū yán jiū 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn bìng bìng 提供tí gōng tí gōng 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 资助zī zhù zī zhù 似乎sì hū sì hū hěn hěn 寻常xún cháng xún cháng
When the Coalition abolished it, the Commission was immediately reconstituted as the privately-funded Climate Council, suggesting it had sufficient non-government support to continue. 2. **Think tank funding generally:** Both major parties have historically directed funding to research centres and think tanks aligned with their policy perspectives.
然而rán ér rán ér 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ céng céng yīn yīn 出于chū yú chū yú 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 动机dòng jī dòng jī de de 资助zī zhù zī zhù 决定jué dìng jué dìng ér ér 受到shòu dào shòu dào 批评pī píng pī píng
The difference in this case was the overtly political nature of the funding, the direct approach from the PM's office, and the lack of competitive process.
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 气候qì hòu qì hòu 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 本身běn shēn běn shēn ** * ** * 阿博特ā bó tè ā bó tè 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 废除fèi chú fèi chú de de 气候qì hòu qì hòu 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì shì shì yóu yóu 陆克文lù kè wén lù kè wén // / 吉拉德jí lā dé jí lā dé 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 20112011 2011 nián nián 设立shè lì shè lì de de 旨在zhǐ zài zhǐ zài 提供tí gōng tí gōng 关于guān yú guān yú 气候变化qì hòu biàn huà qì hòu biàn huà de de "" " 独立dú lì dú lì "" " 信息xìn xī xìn xī
The key distinction is that while both parties fund research aligned with their views, the Lomborg centre was unusually explicit in its political motivation, as evidenced by reports that it originated from the Prime Minister's office rather than through normal research funding mechanisms.
批评者pī píng zhě pī píng zhě 当时dāng shí dāng shí 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi zài zài 气候qì hòu qì hòu 倡导者chàng dǎo zhě chàng dǎo zhě zhōng zhōng 充满chōng mǎn chōng mǎn le le 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 色彩sè cǎi sè cǎi [[ [ 44 4 ]] ]
dāng dāng 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 废除fèi chú fèi chú shí shí gāi gāi 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 立即lì jí lì jí 重组chóng zǔ chóng zǔ wèi wèi 私人sī rén sī rén 资助zī zhù zī zhù de de 气候qì hòu qì hòu 理事会lǐ shì huì lǐ shì huì 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng yǒu yǒu 足够zú gòu zú gòu de de 非政府fēi zhèng fǔ fēi zhèng fǔ 支持zhī chí zhī chí lái lái 继续jì xù jì xù 运作yùn zuò yùn zuò
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 智库zhì kù zhì kù 资助zī zhù zī zhù 总体zǒng tǐ zǒng tǐ 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng ** * ** * 两大liǎng dà liǎng dà 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ shàng shàng dōu dōu céng céng xiàng xiàng 与其yǔ qí yǔ qí 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn 一致yí zhì yí zhì de de 研究yán jiū yán jiū 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn 智库zhì kù zhì kù 提供tí gōng tí gōng 资助zī zhù zī zhù
本案běn àn běn àn de de 区别qū bié qū bié 在于zài yú zài yú 资助zī zhù zī zhù de de 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 性质xìng zhì xìng zhì 来自lái zì lái zì 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ 办公室bàn gōng shì bàn gōng shì de de 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 接洽jiē qià jiē qià 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 缺乏quē fá quē fá 竞争性jìng zhēng xìng jìng zhēng xìng 程序chéng xù chéng xù
关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 区别qū bié qū bié 在于zài yú zài yú 虽然suī rán suī rán 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng dōu dōu 资助zī zhù zī zhù 与其yǔ qí yǔ qí 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn 一致yí zhì yí zhì de de 研究yán jiū yán jiū 但隆dàn lóng dàn lóng 伯格bó gé bó gé 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn zài zài 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 动机dòng jī dòng jī shàng shàng 异常yì cháng yì cháng 明确míng què míng què yǒu yǒu 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 源自yuán zì yuán zì 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ 办公室bàn gōng shì bàn gōng shì ér ér fēi fēi 通过tōng guò tōng guò 正常zhèng cháng zhèng cháng de de 研究yán jiū yán jiū 资助zī zhù zī zhù 机制jī zhì jī zhì
🌐

平衡视角

** * ** * gāi gāi 言论yán lùn yán lùn 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 告诉gào sù gào sù de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng ** * ** *
**What the claim doesn't tell you:** While the claim correctly identifies the funding commitment and the contrast with Climate Commission cuts, it frames the centre as a "climate denial center" which is inaccurate.
虽然suī rán suī rán gāi gāi 言论yán lùn yán lùn 正确zhèng què zhèng què 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū le le 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 气候qì hòu qì hòu 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn de de 对比duì bǐ duì bǐ dàn dàn jiāng jiāng gāi gāi 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn 描述miáo shù miáo shù wèi wèi "" " 气候qì hòu qì hòu 否认fǒu rèn fǒu rèn 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn "" " shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què de de
Lomborg accepts the scientific consensus on climate change - he disputes the priority and cost-effectiveness of climate action, not the underlying science [1][3].
lóng lóng 伯格bó gé bó gé 接受jiē shòu jiē shòu 气候变化qì hòu biàn huà qì hòu biàn huà de de 科学kē xué kē xué 共识gòng shí gòng shí 质疑zhì yí zhì yí de de shì shì 气候qì hòu qì hòu 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng de de 优先yōu xiān yōu xiān 次序cì xù cì xù 成本chéng běn chéng běn 效益xiào yì xiào yì ér ér fēi fēi 基础科学jī chǔ kē xué jī chǔ kē xué [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
This distinction matters because: 1. **Policy debate vs. science denial:** There is legitimate debate among economists about the optimal allocation of resources between climate mitigation and other global challenges.
这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 区别qū bié qū bié hěn hěn 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi
Lomborg represents one end of this spectrum, not science denial. 2. **The centre was cancelled:** The most significant mitigating factor is that due to academic opposition and public pressure, the centre never actually operated and the funding was returned. 3. **Academic freedom concerns:** Education Minister Christopher Pyne criticized UWA's cancellation, tweeting: "What a sad day for academic freedom when staff at a university silence a dissenting voice rather than test their ideas in debate" [1].
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 辩论biàn lùn biàn lùn 科学kē xué kē xué 否认fǒu rèn fǒu rèn ** * ** * 经济学家jīng jì xué jiā jīng jì xué jiā 之间zhī jiān zhī jiān 关于guān yú guān yú 如何rú hé rú hé zài zài 气候qì hòu qì hòu 缓解huǎn jiě huǎn jiě 其他qí tā qí tā 全球quán qiú quán qiú 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn 之间zhī jiān zhī jiān 最优zuì yōu zuì yōu 分配资源fēn pèi zī yuán fēn pèi zī yuán 存在cún zài cún zài 合法hé fǎ hé fǎ 辩论biàn lùn biàn lùn
While Pyne's view was politically motivated, it raises legitimate questions about whether universities should host researchers with controversial or minority perspectives. **Legitimate government explanation:** The government never provided a detailed public justification for the Lomborg funding.
lóng lóng 伯格bó gé bó gé 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo le le zhè zhè 谱系pǔ xì pǔ xì de de 一个yí gè yí gè 极端jí duān jí duān ér ér fēi fēi 科学kē xué kē xué 否认fǒu rèn fǒu rèn
However, supporters of the initiative argued: - Cost-benefit analysis is a legitimate academic pursuit - Alternative perspectives on climate economics deserve research funding - The Copenhagen Consensus Center had engaged Nobel Laureates in its work **Key comparison:** The Coalition's approach to climate institutions differed markedly from Labor's.
22 2 .. . ** * ** * gāi gāi 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn bèi bèi 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo ** * ** * zuì zuì 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào de de 减轻jiǎn qīng jiǎn qīng 因素yīn sù yīn sù shì shì 由于yóu yú yóu yú 学术xué shù xué shù 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng 压力yā lì yā lì gāi gāi 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn 从未cóng wèi cóng wèi 实际shí jì shí jì 运作yùn zuò yùn zuò 资金zī jīn zī jīn bèi bèi 返还fǎn huán fǎn huán
While Labor established the Climate Commission to advocate for climate action, the Coalition attempted to fund research questioning the priority of climate spending - but notably, this initiative failed due to institutional resistance, and the government did not pursue alternative hosts after UWA withdrew.
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 学术xué shù xué shù 自由zì yóu zì yóu 担忧dān yōu dān yōu ** * ** * 教育部长jiào yù bù zhǎng jiào yù bù zhǎng 克里斯托弗kè lǐ sī tuō fú kè lǐ sī tuō fú ·· · 派恩pài ēn pài ēn 批评pī píng pī píng 西澳xī ào xī ào 大学dà xué dà xué de de 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 决定jué dìng jué dìng 发推文称fā tuī wén chēng fā tuī wén chēng "" " dāng dāng 大学dà xué dà xué de de 工作人员gōng zuò rén yuán gōng zuò rén yuán 压制yā zhì yā zhì 不同bù tóng bù tóng 意见yì jiàn yì jiàn de de 声音shēng yīn shēng yīn ér ér 不是bú shì bú shì zài zài 辩论biàn lùn biàn lùn zhōng zhōng 检验jiǎn yàn jiǎn yàn 他们tā men tā men de de 想法xiǎng fǎ xiǎng fǎ shí shí zhè zhè duì duì 学术xué shù xué shù 自由zì yóu zì yóu 来说lái shuō lái shuō shì shì 悲哀bēi āi bēi āi de de 一天yī tiān yī tiān "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
虽然suī rán suī rán 派恩pài ēn pài ēn de de 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn 出于chū yú chū yú 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 动机dòng jī dòng jī dàn dàn 提出tí chū tí chū le le 一个yí gè yí gè legitimatelegitimate legitimate de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí 大学dà xué dà xué 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 应该yīng gāi yīng gāi 容纳róng nà róng nà 持有chí yǒu chí yǒu 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì huò huò 少数派shǎo shù pài shǎo shù pài 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn de de 研究yán jiū yán jiū 人员rén yuán rén yuán
** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ de de legitimatelegitimate legitimate 解释jiě shì jiě shì ** * ** *
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 从未cóng wèi cóng wèi 就隆jiù lóng jiù lóng 伯格bó gé bó gé 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 提供tí gōng tí gōng 详细xiáng xì xiáng xì de de 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu
然而rán ér rán ér gāi gāi 倡议chàng yì chàng yì de de 支持者zhī chí zhě zhī chí zhě 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi
-- - 成本chéng běn chéng běn 效益xiào yì xiào yì 分析fēn xī fēn xī shì shì 合法hé fǎ hé fǎ de de 学术xué shù xué shù 追求zhuī qiú zhuī qiú
-- - 关于guān yú guān yú 气候qì hòu qì hòu 经济学jīng jì xué jīng jì xué de de 替代tì dài tì dài 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn 值得zhí de zhí de 研究yán jiū yán jiū 资助zī zhù zī zhù
-- - 哥本哈根gē běn hā gēn gē běn hā gēn 共识gòng shí gòng shí 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn céng céng ràng ràng 诺贝尔奖nuò bèi ěr jiǎng nuò bèi ěr jiǎng 得主dé zhǔ dé zhǔ 参与cān yù cān yù 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào ** * ** * 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 对待duì dài duì dài 气候qì hòu qì hòu 机构jī gòu jī gòu de de 方式fāng shì fāng shì 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 明显míng xiǎn míng xiǎn 不同bù tóng bù tóng
虽然suī rán suī rán 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì le le 气候qì hòu qì hòu 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì lái lái 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 气候qì hòu qì hòu 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng dàn dàn 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 试图shì tú shì tú 资助zī zhù zī zhù 质疑zhì yí zhì yí 气候qì hòu qì hòu 支出zhī chū zhī chū 优先级yōu xiān jí yōu xiān jí de de 研究yán jiū yán jiū dàn dàn 值得注意zhí de zhù yì zhí de zhù yì de de shì shì 这一zhè yī zhè yī 倡议chàng yì chàng yì yīn yīn 机构jī gòu jī gòu 抵制dǐ zhì dǐ zhì ér ér 失败shī bài shī bài zài zài 西澳xī ào xī ào 大学dà xué dà xué 退出tuì chū tuì chū hòu hòu 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 寻找xún zhǎo xún zhǎo 其他qí tā qí tā 承办方chéng bàn fāng chéng bàn fāng

部分属实

6.0

/ 10

核心hé xīn hé xīn 事实shì shí shì shí shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què de de 400400 400 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 确实què shí què shí 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò lóng lóng 伯格bó gé bó gé 缺乏quē fá quē fá 正规zhèng guī zhèng guī de de 科学kē xué kē xué // / 经济学jīng jì xué jīng jì xué 资质zī zhì zī zhì 气候qì hòu qì hòu 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì bèi bèi 废除fèi chú fèi chú
The core facts are accurate: $4 million was pledged, Lomborg lacks formal science/economics qualifications, and the Climate Commission was abolished.
然而rán ér rán ér jiāng jiāng 描述miáo shù miáo shù wèi wèi "" " 气候qì hòu qì hòu 否认fǒu rèn fǒu rèn 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn "" " shì shì 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng de de lóng lóng 伯格bó gé bó gé shì shì 异议yì yì yì yì zhě zhě // / 拖延者tuō yán zhě tuō yán zhě ér ér fēi fēi 否认fǒu rèn fǒu rèn zhě zhě
However, the characterization as a "climate denial center" is misleading - Lomborg is a contrarian/delayer, not a denier.
gèng gèng 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào de de shì shì 由于yóu yú yóu yú 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng 学术界xué shù jiè xué shù jiè de de 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì gāi gāi 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn 从未cóng wèi cóng wèi 实际shí jì shí jì 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì 资金zī jīn zī jīn 返还fǎn huán fǎn huán
More importantly, the centre was never actually established due to public and academic opposition, and the funding was returned.
gāi gāi 言论yán lùn yán lùn 忽略hū lüè hū lüè le le zhè zhè 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 结果jié guǒ jié guǒ zhè zhè 从根本上cóng gēn běn shàng cóng gēn běn shàng 改变gǎi biàn gǎi biàn le le 叙事xù shì xù shì cóng cóng "" " 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 资助zī zhù zī zhù 气候qì hòu qì hòu 否认fǒu rèn fǒu rèn "" " 变为biàn wèi biàn wèi "" " 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 试图shì tú shì tú 资助zī zhù zī zhù yǒu yǒu 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì de de 研究yán jiū yán jiū dàn dàn 失败shī bài shī bài le le "" "
The claim omits this crucial outcome, which significantly changes the narrative from "government funded climate denial" to "government attempted to fund controversial research but failed." The juxtaposition with Climate Commission cuts is valid, though the "lack of funds" cited by the government for the Commission cuts was part of broader budget reduction efforts, not a specific claim that $4 million couldn't be found.
气候qì hòu qì hòu 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn de de 对比duì bǐ duì bǐ shì shì 有效yǒu xiào yǒu xiào de de 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ wèi wèi 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì suǒ suǒ 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng de de "" " 资金不足zī jīn bù zú zī jīn bù zú "" " shì shì gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn de de 预算yù suàn yù suàn 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 努力nǔ lì nǔ lì de de 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn ér ér fēi fēi 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng zhǎo zhǎo 不到bú dào bú dào 400400 400 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán

📚 来源与引用 (4)

  1. 1
    "'Passionate reaction' sinks UWA Bjorn Lomborg Consensus Centre"

    "'Passionate reaction' sinks UWA Bjorn Lomborg Consensus Centre"

    The University of Western Australia cancels the contract for a policy centre that was to be based on the methodology of controversial academic Bjorn Lomborg after a "passionate emotional reaction" to the plan.

    Abc Net
  2. 2
    "Academics want UWA to pull plug on Bjorn Lomborg's $4m 'Consensus Centre'"

    "Academics want UWA to pull plug on Bjorn Lomborg's $4m 'Consensus Centre'"

    Senior academics at an Australian university are asking their bosses to pull the plug on a $4 million taxpayer funded research centre fronted by climate science contrarian Bjorn Lomborg, writes Graham...

    Independent Australia
  3. 3
    "Bjørn Lomborg"

    "Bjørn Lomborg"

    Wikipedia
  4. 4
    en.wikipedia.org

    "Climate Commission"

    Wikipedia

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。