部分属实

评分: 6.0/10

Coalition
C0513

声明内容

“非法批准了一个对环境有害的矿场。随后,他们批评了那些指出这一违法行为的人,并试图修改法律,使环保人士无法对非法矿场采取法律行动。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

###### ### 阿ā ā 达尼dá ní dá ní 卡kǎ kǎ 迈克尔mài kè ěr mài kè ěr 矿场kuàng chǎng kuàng chǎng 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn
### The Adani Carmichael Mine Approval
该gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng 指zhǐ zhǐ 的de de 是shì shì 环境huán jìng huán jìng 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng GregGreg Greg HuntHunt Hunt 对duì duì 阿ā ā 达尼dá ní dá ní 公司gōng sī gōng sī 在zài zài 昆士兰州kūn shì lán zhōu kūn shì lán zhōu 加利利jiā lì lì jiā lì lì 盆地pén dì pén dì 价值jià zhí jià zhí 165165 165 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 的de de 卡kǎ kǎ 迈克尔mài kè ěr mài kè ěr 煤矿méi kuàng méi kuàng 的de de 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn 。。 。
The claim refers to Environment Minister Greg Hunt's approval of Adani's $16.5 billion Carmichael coal mine in Queensland's Galilee Basin.
该gāi gāi 矿场kuàng chǎng kuàng chǎng 最初zuì chū zuì chū 于yú yú 20142014 2014 年nián nián 77 7 月yuè yuè 获得huò dé huò dé 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The mine was originally approved in July 2014 [1].
20152015 2015 年nián nián 88 8 月yuè yuè 55 5 日rì rì ,, , 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 根据gēn jù gēn jù 麦凯mài kǎi mài kǎi 环保huán bǎo huán bǎo 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 的de de 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn 撤销chè xiāo chè xiāo 了le le 此项cǐ xiàng cǐ xiàng 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
On August 5, 2015, the Federal Court set aside (overturned) this approval following a legal challenge by the Mackay Conservation Group [2].
法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 认定rèn dìng rèn dìng HuntHunt Hunt 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 未能wèi néng wèi néng 按照àn zhào àn zhào 《《 《 19991999 1999 年nián nián 环境保护huán jìng bǎo hù huán jìng bǎo hù 与yǔ yǔ 生物shēng wù shēng wù 多样性duō yàng xìng duō yàng xìng 保护法bǎo hù fǎ bǎo hù fǎ 》》 》 (( ( EPBCEPBC EPBC 法fǎ fǎ )) ) 的de de 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú ,, , 适当shì dàng shì dàng 考虑kǎo lǜ kǎo lǜ 关于guān yú guān yú 两种liǎng zhǒng liǎng zhǒng 濒危bīn wēi bīn wēi 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng —— — —— — 雅卡yǎ kǎ yǎ kǎ 石龙子shí lóng zi shí lóng zi 和hé hé 饰shì shì 纹wén wén 蛇shé shé 的de de 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
The court found that Minister Hunt had failed to properly consider conservation advice regarding two threatened species—the yakka skink and the ornamental snake—as required under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) [2][3].
法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 判决pàn jué pàn jué 是shì shì 经jīng jīng 双方同意shuāng fāng tóng yì shuāng fāng tóng yì 的de de ,, , 意味着yì wèi zhe yì wèi zhe 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 和hé hé 阿ā ā 达尼dá ní dá ní 公司gōng sī gōng sī 承认错误chéng rèn cuò wù chéng rèn cuò wù 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 抗辩kàng biàn kàng biàn [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
The court decision was made by consent, meaning the Minister and Adani conceded the error rather than fighting the case [3].
环境huán jìng huán jìng 部门bù mén bù mén 将jiāng jiāng 此cǐ cǐ 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为wèi wèi 涉及shè jí shè jí 如何rú hé rú hé 向xiàng xiàng 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 呈报chéng bào chéng bào 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 的de de "" " 技术性jì shù xìng jì shù xìng 问题wèn tí wèn tí "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The Environment Department characterized this as a "technical matter" involving how advice was presented to the Minister [2].
###### ### 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn 及jí jí 对duì duì 环保huán bǎo huán bǎo 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 的de de 批评pī píng pī píng
### Re-Approval and Criticism of Environmental Groups
法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 判决pàn jué pàn jué 后hòu hòu ,, , HuntHunt Hunt 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 于yú yú 20152015 2015 年nián nián 1010 10 月yuè yuè 1515 15 日rì rì 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn 了le le 该gāi gāi 矿场kuàng chǎng kuàng chǎng ,, , 称其chēng qí chēng qí 附带fù dài fù dài "" " 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 最zuì zuì 严格yán gé yán gé 的de de 3636 36 项xiàng xiàng 环境huán jìng huán jìng 条件tiáo jiàn tiáo jiàn "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
Following the court decision, Minister Hunt re-approved the mine on October 15, 2015, stating it came with "36 of the strictest environmental conditions imposed in Australia" [1][4].
HuntHunt Hunt 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 公开批评gōng kāi pī píng gōng kāi pī píng 环保huán bǎo huán bǎo 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 发起fā qǐ fā qǐ 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn 。。 。
Minister Hunt publicly criticized environmental groups for the legal challenge.
据jù jù 《《 《 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 金融jīn róng jīn róng 评论píng lùn píng lùn 报bào bào 》》 》 报道bào dào bào dào ,, , HuntHunt Hunt "" " 抨击pēng jī pēng jī 环保huán bǎo huán bǎo 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 滥用làn yòng làn yòng 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng 拖延tuō yán tuō yán 大型dà xíng dà xíng 采矿cǎi kuàng cǎi kuàng 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù "" " ,, , 并bìng bìng 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 他tā tā "" " 仍réng réng 致力于zhì lì yú zhì lì yú 堵住dǔ zhù dǔ zhù 审批shěn pī shěn pī 程序chéng xù chéng xù 中zhōng zhōng 的de de 漏洞lòu dòng lòu dòng "" " [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
According to the Australian Financial Review, Hunt "slammed environmental groups for abusing the legal system to delay big mining projects" and stated he was "still committed to closing the loopholes in the approval process" [3].
此番cǐ fān cǐ fān 批评pī píng pī píng 发生fā shēng fā shēng 在zài zài 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 认定rèn dìng rèn dìng 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn 存在cún zài cún zài 程序性chéng xù xìng chéng xù xìng 错误cuò wù cuò wù 之后zhī hòu zhī hòu 。。 。
This criticism occurred after the court found the approval had procedural errors.
###### ### 拟议nǐ yì nǐ yì 的de de 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi
### Proposed Law Changes
20152015 2015 年nián nián 88 8 月yuè yuè 1818 18 日rì rì —— — —— — 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 判决pàn jué pàn jué 后仅hòu jǐn hòu jǐn 两周liǎng zhōu liǎng zhōu —— — —— — 司法部长sī fǎ bù zhǎng sī fǎ bù zhǎng GeorgeGeorge George BrandisBrandis Brandis 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 计划jì huà jì huà 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi EPBCEPBC EPBC 法fǎ fǎ ,, , 废除fèi chú fèi chú 第dì dì 487487 487 条tiáo tiáo 。。 。
On August 18, 2015—just two weeks after the court decision—Attorney-General George Brandis announced plans to amend the EPBC Act to repeal Section 487, which provides environmental groups with standing to challenge environmental approvals in court [5][6].
该gāi gāi 条款tiáo kuǎn tiáo kuǎn 赋予fù yǔ fù yǔ 环保huán bǎo huán bǎo 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 在zài zài 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 上shàng shàng 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn 环境huán jìng huán jìng 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn 的de de 资格zī gé zī gé [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
Section 487 allows individuals and organizations that have engaged in environmental protection activities for at least two years to have standing (legal right) to challenge approvals without needing to prove direct personal impact [5].
第dì dì 487487 487 条tiáo tiáo 允许yǔn xǔ yǔn xǔ 从事cóng shì cóng shì 环保huán bǎo huán bǎo 活动huó dòng huó dòng 至少zhì shǎo zhì shǎo 两年liǎng nián liǎng nián 的de de 个人gè rén gè rén 和hé hé 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 无需wú xū wú xū 证明zhèng míng zhèng míng 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 个人gè rén gè rén 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 即jí jí 拥有yōng yǒu yōng yǒu 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn 的de de 资格zī gé zī gé [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
Brandis argued this provision provided a "red carpet for radical activists wanting to use aggressive litigation tactics to disrupt and sabotage important projects" [5].
BrandisBrandis Brandis 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 该gāi gāi 条款tiáo kuǎn tiáo kuǎn 为wèi wèi "" " 想要xiǎng yào xiǎng yào 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 激进jī jìn jī jìn 诉讼sù sòng sù sòng 策略cè lüè cè lüè 来lái lái 干扰gān rǎo gān rǎo 和hé hé 破坏pò huài pò huài 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 的de de 激进jī jìn jī jìn 活动huó dòng huó dòng 人士rén shì rén shì 铺上pù shàng pù shàng 了le le 红地毯hóng dì tǎn hóng dì tǎn "" " [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。

缺失背景

###### ### "" " 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng 错误cuò wù cuò wù "" " 与yǔ yǔ "" " 非法fēi fǎ fēi fǎ "" " 的de de 定性dìng xìng dìng xìng 差异chā yì chā yì
### Administrative vs. "Illegal" Characterization
该gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng 将jiāng jiāng 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn 定性dìng xìng dìng xìng 为wèi wèi "" " 非法fēi fǎ fēi fǎ "" " ,, , 但dàn dàn 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 判决pàn jué pàn jué 的de de 依据yī jù yī jù 是shì shì 未能wèi néng wèi néng 适当shì dàng shì dàng 考虑kǎo lǜ kǎo lǜ 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 的de de 程序性chéng xù xìng chéng xù xìng 失误shī wù shī wù —— — —— — 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 腐败fǔ bài fǔ bài 或huò huò 刑事xíng shì xíng shì 不当bù dàng bù dàng 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi 的de de 实质性shí zhì xìng shí zhì xìng 认定rèn dìng rèn dìng [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
The claim frames the approval as "illegal," but the court decision was based on a procedural failure to properly consider conservation advice—not on substantive findings of corruption or criminal wrongdoing [2][3].
环境huán jìng huán jìng 部门bù mén bù mén 将jiāng jiāng 其qí qí 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为wèi wèi 涉及shè jí shè jí 部门bù mén bù mén 如何rú hé rú hé 向xiàng xiàng 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 呈报chéng bào chéng bào 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 的de de "" " 技术性jì shù xìng jì shù xìng 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng 问题wèn tí wèn tí "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The Environment Department described it as a "technical, administrative matter" concerning how departmental advice was presented to the Minister [2].
法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 认定rèn dìng rèn dìng 矿场kuàng chǎng kuàng chǎng 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn 在zài zài 实质shí zhì shí zhì 上shàng shàng 是shì shì 错误cuò wù cuò wù 的de de ,, , 也yě yě 未wèi wèi 认定rèn dìng rèn dìng 环境huán jìng huán jìng 条件tiáo jiàn tiáo jiàn 不bù bù 充分chōng fèn chōng fèn 。。 。
The court did not find that the mine approval was substantively wrong or that environmental conditions were inadequate.
事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng ,, , 部门bù mén bù mén 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn "" " 确实què shí què shí 包含bāo hán bāo hán 了le le 管理guǎn lǐ guǎn lǐ 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 的de de 适当shì dàng shì dàng 条件tiáo jiàn tiáo jiàn "" " ,, , 且qiě qiě 重新考虑chóng xīn kǎo lǜ chóng xīn kǎo lǜ 该gāi gāi 决定jué dìng jué dìng "" " 无需wú xū wú xū 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 审视shěn shì shěn shì 整个zhěng gè zhěng gè 审批shěn pī shěn pī 流程liú chéng liú chéng "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
In fact, the department noted the approval "did include appropriate conditions to manage the species protection" and that reconsidering the decision "does not require revisiting the entire approval process" [2].
###### ### 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn 了le le 该gāi gāi 矿场kuàng chǎng kuàng chǎng
### The Minister Re-Approved the Mine
该gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 判决pàn jué pàn jué 后hòu hòu ,, , HuntHunt Hunt 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 仅jǐn jǐn 在zài zài 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 月yuè yuè 后hòu hòu 即jí jí 20152015 2015 年nián nián 1010 10 月yuè yuè 1515 15 日rì rì 便biàn biàn 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn 了le le 同一tóng yī tóng yī 矿场kuàng chǎng kuàng chǎng ,, , 并bìng bìng 附加fù jiā fù jiā 了le le 额外é wài é wài 条件tiáo jiàn tiáo jiàn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
Missing from the claim is that after the court decision, Minister Hunt re-approved the same mine just two months later (October 15, 2015) with additional conditions [1][4].
这zhè zhè 证明zhèng míng zhèng míng 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 程序chéng xù chéng xù 发挥fā huī fā huī 了le le 预期yù qī yù qī 作用zuò yòng zuò yòng —— — —— — 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn 程序chéng xù chéng xù 缺陷quē xiàn quē xiàn 并bìng bìng 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 纠正jiū zhèng jiū zhèng ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 永久yǒng jiǔ yǒng jiǔ 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ 该gāi gāi 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 。。 。
This demonstrates the court process functioned as intended—identifying procedural flaws and requiring their correction rather than permanently blocking the project.
###### ### 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 对duì duì 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 的de de 支持zhī chí zhī chí
### Bipartisan Support for the Project
该gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le 阿ā ā 达尼dá ní dá ní 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 获得huò dé huò dé 了le le 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 支持zhī chí zhī chí 的de de 事实shì shí shì shí 。。 。
The claim omits that the Adani project had support from both sides of politics.
昆士兰州kūn shì lán zhōu kūn shì lán zhōu 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 矿产kuàng chǎn kuàng chǎn 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng AnthonyAnthony Anthony LynhamLynham Lynham 对duì duì 延期yán qī yán qī 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 失望shī wàng shī wàng ,, , 呼吁hū yù hū yù 联邦政府lián bāng zhèng fǔ lián bāng zhèng fǔ "" " 尽快jǐn kuài jǐn kuài 解决jiě jué jiě jué 这个zhè ge zhè ge 问题wèn tí wèn tí "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
Queensland's Labor Mines Minister Anthony Lynham expressed disappointment at the delay and called on the federal government to "sort this out as quickly as possible" [2].
时任shí rèn shí rèn 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ TonyTony Tony AbbottAbbott Abbott 此前cǐ qián cǐ qián 曾céng céng 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 该gāi gāi 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 是shì shì "" " 为wèi wèi 印度yìn dù yìn dù 穷人qióng rén qióng rén 消除xiāo chú xiāo chú 贫困pín kùn pín kùn 的de de 奇迹qí jì qí jì "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
Prime Minister Tony Abbott had previously declared the project a "poverty-busting miracle for India's poor" [2].
###### ### 第dì dì 487487 487 条tiáo tiáo 的de de 目的mù dì mù dì
### Section 487's Purpose
该gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng 未解释wèi jiě shì wèi jiě shì EPBCEPBC EPBC 法fǎ fǎ 第dì dì 487487 487 条tiáo tiáo 的de de 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 设计shè jì shè jì 初衷chū zhōng chū zhōng 是shì shì 允许yǔn xǔ yǔn xǔ 环保huán bǎo huán bǎo 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 受shòu shòu 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 的de de 社区shè qū shè qū 行事xíng shì xíng shì —— — —— — 这是zhè shì zhè shì 一种yī zhǒng yī zhǒng "" " 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 资格zī gé zī gé "" " ,, , 使麦凯shǐ mài kǎi shǐ mài kǎi 环保huán bǎo huán bǎo 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 等děng děng 团体tuán tǐ tuán tǐ 能够néng gòu néng gòu 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 国家guó jiā guó jiā 环境huán jìng huán jìng 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 事项shì xiàng shì xiàng 的de de 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
The claim doesn't explain that Section 487 of the EPBC Act was specifically designed to allow environmental groups to act on behalf of affected communities—a form of "representative standing" that enables organizations like the Mackay Conservation Group to challenge approvals affecting matters of national environmental significance [5].

来源可信度评估

###### ### NewNew New MatildaMatilda Matilda
### New Matilda
原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 消息来源xiāo xī lái yuán xiāo xī lái yuán NewNew New MatildaMatilda Matilda 是shì shì 一家yī jiā yī jiā 成立chéng lì chéng lì 于yú yú 20042004 2004 年nián nián 的de de 独立dú lì dú lì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 与yǔ yǔ 分析fēn xī fēn xī 网站wǎng zhàn wǎng zhàn [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。 。
The original source, New Matilda, is an independent Australian news and analysis website founded in 2004 [7].
根据gēn jù gēn jù MediaMedia Media BiasBias Bias // / FactFact Fact CheckCheck Check 的de de 评估píng gū píng gū ,, , NewNew New MatildaMatilda Matilda 被评bèi píng bèi píng 定为dìng wèi dìng wèi ** * ** * 左翼zuǒ yì zuǒ yì ** * ** * (( ( 存在cún zài cún zài 左翼zuǒ yì zuǒ yì 偏见piān jiàn piān jiàn )) ) [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。 。
According to Media Bias/Fact Check, New Matilda is rated as **Left-wing** (left-biased) [7].
该gāi gāi 网站wǎng zhàn wǎng zhàn 自称为zì chēng wèi zì chēng wèi 报道bào dào bào dào "" " 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 及jí jí 国际guó jì guó jì 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 、、 、 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 与yǔ yǔ 文化wén huà wén huà "" " 的de de "" " 独立dú lì dú lì 新闻xīn wén xīn wén "" " [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。 。
The site describes itself as "independent journalism" covering "Australian and international politics, media and culture" [7]. **Assessment**: New Matilda has a clear left-wing editorial perspective and should be read with awareness of this bias.
** * ** * 评估píng gū píng gū ** * ** * :: : NewNew New MatildaMatilda Matilda 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 明显míng xiǎn míng xiǎn 的de de 左翼zuǒ yì zuǒ yì 编辑biān jí biān jí 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng ,, , 阅读yuè dú yuè dú 时应shí yīng shí yīng 注意zhù yì zhù yì 这一zhè yī zhè yī 偏见piān jiàn piān jiàn 。。 。
While the article's core facts about the court decision and proposed law changes are accurate, the framing uses loaded language ("bungles," "vigilante litigation") that reflects partisan positioning.
虽然suī rán suī rán 该gāi gāi 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 关于guān yú guān yú 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 判决pàn jué pàn jué 和hé hé 拟议nǐ yì nǐ yì 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi 的de de 核心hé xīn hé xīn 事实shì shí shì shí 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què ,, , 但dàn dàn 其qí qí 措辞cuò cí cuò cí 带有dài yǒu dài yǒu 倾向性qīng xiàng xìng qīng xiàng xìng (( ( "" " 搞砸gǎo zá gǎo zá "" " 、、 、 "" " 私刑sī xíng sī xíng 诉讼sù sòng sù sòng "" " )) ) ,, , 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 了le le 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 。。 。
For balanced analysis, left-leaning sources like New Matilda should be cross-referenced with mainstream outlets (ABC, SMH, AFR) and official sources.
为wèi wèi 获得huò dé huò dé 平衡píng héng píng héng 的de de 分析fēn xī fēn xī ,, , 应yīng yīng 将jiāng jiāng NewNew New MatildaMatilda Matilda 等děng děng 左翼zuǒ yì zuǒ yì 消息来源xiāo xī lái yuán xiāo xī lái yuán 与yǔ yǔ 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ (( ( ABCABC ABC 、、 、 SMHSMH SMH 、、 、 AFRAFR AFR )) ) 及jí jí 官方guān fāng guān fāng 来源lái yuán lái yuán 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 交叉jiāo chā jiāo chā 比bǐ bǐ 对duì duì 。。 。
⚖️

工党对比

###### ### 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 存在cún zài cún zài 类似lèi sì lèi sì 问题wèn tí wèn tí ?? ?
### Did Labor Have Similar Issues?
** * ** * 搜索sōu suǒ sōu suǒ 内容nèi róng nèi róng ** * ** * :: : "" " LaborLabor Labor governmentgovernment government coalcoal coal minemine mine approvalsapprovals approvals environmentalenvironmental environmental legallegal legal challengeschallenges challenges "" " (( ( 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 煤矿méi kuàng méi kuàng 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn 环境huán jìng huán jìng 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn )) )
**Search conducted**: "Labor government coal mine approvals environmental legal challenges" **Finding**: Labor governments also approved major coal mining projects and faced environmental legal challenges: - The **Keating Government** (1991-1996) and subsequent **Howard Government** developed the EPBC Act framework that governs environmental approvals.
** * ** * 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn ** * ** * :: : 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 也yě yě 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn 了le le 大型dà xíng dà xíng 煤矿méi kuàng méi kuàng 开采kāi cǎi kāi cǎi 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù ,, , 并bìng bìng 面临miàn lín miàn lín 环保huán bǎo huán bǎo 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn :: :
Section 487, which Brandis sought to repeal, was part of the original EPBC Act passed under the Howard Government in 1999 [5]. - Under the **Rudd/Gillard Labor Governments** (2007-2013), multiple coal mining approvals proceeded.
-- - ** * ** * 基廷jī tíng jī tíng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ ** * ** * (( ( 19911991 1991 -- - 19961996 1996 年nián nián )) ) 及jí jí 随后suí hòu suí hòu 的de de ** * ** * 霍华德huò huá dé huò huá dé 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ ** * ** * 制定zhì dìng zhì dìng 了le le 管辖guǎn xiá guǎn xiá 环境huán jìng huán jìng 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn 的de de EPBCEPBC EPBC 法fǎ fǎ 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 。。 。
For example, the Labor government approved the Maules Creek coal mine in 2012, which later faced similar legal challenges from environmental groups [8]. - The **Tarkine case** (2013), cited in the Mackay Conservation Group legal challenge, occurred under the Gillard/Rudd Labor Government and involved similar procedural environmental approval issues [9].
BrandisBrandis Brandis 试图shì tú shì tú 废除fèi chú fèi chú 的de de 第dì dì 487487 487 条tiáo tiáo ,, , 正是zhèng shì zhèng shì 19991999 1999 年nián nián 霍华德huò huá dé huò huá dé 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 时期shí qī shí qī 通过tōng guò tōng guò 的de de EPBCEPBC EPBC 法fǎ fǎ 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 内容nèi róng nèi róng 的de de 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
### Comparison of Responses to Legal Challenges
-- - 在zài zài ** * ** * 陆克文lù kè wén lù kè wén // / 吉拉德jí lā dé jí lā dé 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ ** * ** * (( ( 20072007 2007 -- - 20132013 2013 年nián nián )) ) 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 期间qī jiān qī jiān ,, , 多个duō gè duō gè 煤矿méi kuàng méi kuàng 开采kāi cǎi kāi cǎi 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 获批huò pī huò pī 。。 。
The Coalition's proposed repeal of Section 487 was an attempt to reduce environmental groups' legal standing.
例如lì rú lì rú ,, , 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 于yú yú 20122012 2012 年nián nián 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn 了le le MaulesMaules Maules CreekCreek Creek 煤矿méi kuàng méi kuàng ,, , 该gāi gāi 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 后来hòu lái hòu lái 也yě yě 面临miàn lín miàn lín 环保huán bǎo huán bǎo 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 的de de 类似lèi sì lèi sì 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。 。
Labor governments generally operated within the existing EPBC Act framework without attempting to restrict third-party standing, though they too faced criticism from environmental groups for approving controversial projects [8].
-- - ** * ** * TarkineTarkine Tarkine 案àn àn ** * ** * (( ( 20132013 2013 年nián nián )) ) —— — —— — 麦凯mài kǎi mài kǎi 环保huán bǎo huán bǎo 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn 中zhōng zhōng 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 的de de 案例àn lì àn lì —— — —— — 发生fā shēng fā shēng 在zài zài 吉拉德jí lā dé jí lā dé // / 陆克文lù kè wén lù kè wén 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 时期shí qī shí qī ,, , 涉及shè jí shè jí 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 环境huán jìng huán jìng 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn 程序chéng xù chéng xù 问题wèn tí wèn tí [[ [ 99 9 ]] ] 。。 。
The key difference: The Coalition actively sought to change the law to prevent similar challenges, whereas Labor governments did not pursue such legislative changes despite approving comparable mining projects.
###### ### 对duì duì 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn 的de de 回应huí yìng huí yìng 对比duì bǐ duì bǐ
联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 提议tí yì tí yì 废除fèi chú fèi chú 第dì dì 487487 487 条tiáo tiáo ,, , 试图shì tú shì tú 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 环保huán bǎo huán bǎo 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 的de de 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 资格zī gé zī gé 。。 。
工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 在zài zài 现有xiàn yǒu xiàn yǒu EPBCEPBC EPBC 法fǎ fǎ 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 内nèi nèi 运作yùn zuò yùn zuò ,, , 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 试图shì tú shì tú 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 第三方dì sān fāng dì sān fāng 诉讼sù sòng sù sòng 资格zī gé zī gé ,, , 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 他们tā men tā men 也yě yě 因yīn yīn 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn 有yǒu yǒu 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì 的de de 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 而ér ér 受到shòu dào shòu dào 环保huán bǎo huán bǎo 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 的de de 批评pī píng pī píng [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。 。
关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 区别qū bié qū bié :: : 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 积极jī jí jī jí 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 以yǐ yǐ 防止fáng zhǐ fáng zhǐ 类似lèi sì lèi sì 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn ,, , 而ér ér 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 虽然suī rán suī rán 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn 了le le 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 采矿cǎi kuàng cǎi kuàng 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù ,, , 但dàn dàn 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 推动tuī dòng tuī dòng 此类cǐ lèi cǐ lèi 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

###### ### 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng
### The Government's Position
HuntHunt Hunt 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 和hé hé BrandisBrandis Brandis 司法部长sī fǎ bù zhǎng sī fǎ bù zhǎng 将jiāng jiāng 他们tā men tā men 的de de 回应huí yìng huí yìng 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 为wèi wèi 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 就业jiù yè jiù yè ,, , 防止fáng zhǐ fáng zhǐ "" " 私刑sī xíng sī xíng 诉讼sù sòng sù sòng "" " 干扰gān rǎo gān rǎo 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 经济jīng jì jīng jì 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
Minister Hunt and Attorney-General Brandis framed their response as protecting Australian jobs and preventing "vigilante litigation" from disrupting major economic projects [3][5].
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 第dì dì 487487 487 条使tiáo shǐ tiáo shǐ 资金zī jīn zī jīn 充足chōng zú chōng zú 的de de 环保huán bǎo huán bǎo 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 能够néng gòu néng gòu 利用lì yòng lì yòng 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 程序chéng xù chéng xù 拖延tuō yán tuō yán 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù ,, , 无论wú lùn wú lùn 其qí qí 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 正当性zhèng dāng xìng zhèng dāng xìng [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
The government argued that Section 487 allowed well-funded environmental groups to use legal processes to delay projects regardless of merit [5].
该gāi gāi 矿场kuàng chǎng kuàng chǎng 在zài zài 附带fù dài fù dài 3636 36 项xiàng xiàng 环境huán jìng huán jìng 条件tiáo jiàn tiáo jiàn 下xià xià 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn —— — —— — 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 100100 100 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 濒危bīn wēi bīn wēi 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 研究yán jiū yán jiū 计划jì huà jì huà 和hé hé 地下水dì xià shuǐ dì xià shuǐ 管理guǎn lǐ guǎn lǐ 方案fāng àn fāng àn —— — —— — 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 试图shì tú shì tú 在zài zài 允许yǔn xǔ yǔn xǔ 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 推进tuī jìn tuī jìn 的de de 同时tóng shí tóng shí 解决jiě jué jiě jué 环境huán jìng huán jìng 问题wèn tí wèn tí [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
The re-approval of the mine with 36 environmental conditions—including a $1 million research program for threatened species and groundwater management plans—suggests the government attempted to address environmental concerns while allowing the project to proceed [1][4].
###### ### 环保huán bǎo huán bǎo 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng
### Environmental Groups' Position
麦凯mài kǎi mài kǎi 环保huán bǎo huán bǎo 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 和hé hé 其他qí tā qí tā 环保huán bǎo huán bǎo 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi ,, , 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn 是shì shì 制约zhì yuē zhì yuē 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 决策jué cè jué cè 的de de 必要bì yào bì yào 手段shǒu duàn shǒu duàn ,, , 特别tè bié tè bié 是shì shì 对于duì yú duì yú 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 环境影响huán jìng yǐng xiǎng huán jìng yǐng xiǎng 的de de 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
The Mackay Conservation Group and other environmental organizations argued that legal challenges are a necessary check on government decision-making, particularly for projects with significant environmental impacts [2][5].
成功chéng gōng chéng gōng 的de de 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn 证明zhèng míng zhèng míng 审批shěn pī shěn pī 流程liú chéng liú chéng 存在cún zài cún zài 需要xū yào xū yào 纠正jiū zhèng jiū zhèng 的de de 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 程序chéng xù chéng xù 缺陷quē xiàn quē xiàn 。。 。
The successful challenge demonstrated that the approval process had genuine procedural flaws that needed correction.
###### ### 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 评估píng gū píng gū
### Expert Assessment
学术xué shù xué shù 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū ,, , 废除fèi chú fèi chú 第dì dì 487487 487 条tiáo tiáo 将jiāng jiāng "" " 与yǔ yǔ 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 前qián qián 两次liǎng cì liǎng cì 提案tí àn tí àn 的de de 明确míng què míng què 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 相悖xiāng bèi xiāng bèi "" " ,, , 并bìng bìng 将jiāng jiāng 环境法huán jìng fǎ huán jìng fǎ "" " 一路yī lù yī lù 倒退dào tuì dào tuì 至zhì zhì 19741974 1974 年nián nián 的de de 前身qián shēn qián shēn 状态zhuàng tài zhuàng tài "" " [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
Academic experts noted that removing Section 487 would be "contrary to the express recommendations of two former Australian Law Reform Commission proposals" and would take environmental law "all the way back to its 1974 predecessor" [5].
拟议nǐ yì nǐ yì 的de de 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi 被bèi bèi 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为wèi wèi 与yǔ yǔ "" " 当今dāng jīn dāng jīn 我们wǒ men wǒ men 所处suǒ chù suǒ chù 的de de 已yǐ yǐ 改变gǎi biàn gǎi biàn 的de de 形势xíng shì xíng shì —— — —— — 资源zī yuán zī yuán 冲突chōng tū chōng tū 、、 、 加剧jiā jù jiā jù 的de de 环境huán jìng huán jìng 风险fēng xiǎn fēng xiǎn 、、 、 气候变化qì hòu biàn huà qì hòu biàn huà 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 水力shuǐ lì shuǐ lì 压裂yā liè yā liè 等děng děng 技术jì shù jì shù 进步jìn bù jìn bù 对duì duì 环境huán jìng huán jìng 构成gòu chéng gòu chéng 巨大jù dà jù dà 威胁wēi xié wēi xié "" " 不bù bù 一致yí zhì yí zhì [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
The proposed change was described as inconsistent with "the altered landscape that we find ourselves in today—where resource conflicts, heightened environmental risks, climate change, and technological advancements such as fracking pose enormous threats to the environment" [5].
###### ### 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 模式mó shì mó shì
### The Broader Pattern
这一zhè yī zhè yī 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 了le le 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 环境huán jìng huán jìng 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 中zhōng zhōng 常见cháng jiàn cháng jiàn 的de de 紧张jǐn zhāng jǐn zhāng 关系guān xì guān xì :: : 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 资源zī yuán zī yuán 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 出于chū yú chū yú 经济jīng jì jīng jì 原因yuán yīn yuán yīn 获得huò dé huò dé 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 支持zhī chí zhī chí ,, , 同时tóng shí tóng shí 面临miàn lín miàn lín 环保huán bǎo huán bǎo 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 的de de 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 。。 。
This incident reflects a common tension in Australian environmental policy: major resource projects often have bipartisan support for economic reasons while facing opposition from environmental groups.
联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 和hé hé 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 都dōu dōu 曾céng céng 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn 有yǒu yǒu 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì 的de de 采矿cǎi kuàng cǎi kuàng 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù ;; ; 这里zhè lǐ zhè lǐ 的de de 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 区别qū bié qū bié 在于zài yú zài yú 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 试图shì tú shì tú 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn 此类cǐ lèi cǐ lèi 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn 的de de 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 途径tú jìng tú jìng 。。 。
Both Coalition and Labor governments have approved controversial mining projects; the key difference here was the Coalition's attempt to restrict legal avenues for challenging such approvals.

部分属实

6.0

/ 10

核心hé xīn hé xīn 事实shì shí shì shí 是shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de :: : (( ( 11 1 )) ) 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 确实què shí què shí 因yīn yīn 程序chéng xù chéng xù 失误shī wù shī wù 撤销chè xiāo chè xiāo 了le le 阿ā ā 达尼dá ní dá ní 矿场kuàng chǎng kuàng chǎng 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn ;; ; (( ( 22 2 )) ) HuntHunt Hunt 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 确实què shí què shí 批评pī píng pī píng 环保huán bǎo huán bǎo 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn ;; ; (( ( 33 3 )) ) BrandisBrandis Brandis 司法部长sī fǎ bù zhǎng sī fǎ bù zhǎng 确实què shí què shí 提议tí yì tí yì 废除fèi chú fèi chú EPBCEPBC EPBC 法fǎ fǎ 第dì dì 487487 487 条以tiáo yǐ tiáo yǐ 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 环保huán bǎo huán bǎo 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 的de de 诉讼sù sòng sù sòng 资格zī gé zī gé 。。 。
The core facts are accurate: (1) the Federal Court did set aside the Adani mine approval due to procedural failures, (2) Minister Hunt criticized environmental groups for using legal challenges, and (3) Attorney-General Brandis proposed repealing Section 487 of the EPBC Act to limit environmental groups' standing to challenge approvals.
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 该gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng 包含bāo hán bāo hán 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù :: :
However, the claim contains misleading framing: 1. **"Illegally gave approval"** overstates the issue.
11 1 .. . ** * ** * "" " 非法fēi fǎ fēi fǎ 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn "" " ** * ** * 夸大kuā dà kuā dà 了le le 问题wèn tí wèn tí 性质xìng zhì xìng zhì 。。 。
The court found a procedural failure to properly consider conservation advice—a technical administrative matter—not criminal illegality or substantive corruption.
法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 认定rèn dìng rèn dìng 的de de 是shì shì 未能wèi néng wèi néng 适当shì dàng shì dàng 考虑kǎo lǜ kǎo lǜ 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 的de de 程序性chéng xù xìng chéng xù xìng 失误shī wù shī wù —— — —— — 属于shǔ yú shǔ yú 技术性jì shù xìng jì shù xìng 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng 问题wèn tí wèn tí —— — —— — 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 刑事xíng shì xíng shì 非法fēi fǎ fēi fǎ 或huò huò 实质性shí zhì xìng shí zhì xìng 腐败fǔ bài fǔ bài 。。 。
The Minister and department conceded the error by consent. 2. **"Tried to change the law"** suggests an completed action, but the proposed amendment to repeal Section 487 was announced but not ultimately passed into law at that time. (Note: Similar amendments were later proposed and debated but faced significant opposition.) 3.
部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 和hé hé 部门bù mén bù mén 以yǐ yǐ 同意tóng yì tóng yì 方式fāng shì fāng shì 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn 了le le 该gāi gāi 错误cuò wù cuò wù 。。 。
The claim omits that the mine was re-approved two months later with additional conditions, and that the procedural flaw was corrected through the proper legal process.
22 2 .. . ** * ** * "" " 试图shì tú shì tú 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ "" " ** * ** * 暗示àn shì àn shì 了le le 已yǐ yǐ 完成wán chéng wán chéng 的de de 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi ,, , 但dàn dàn 废除fèi chú fèi chú 第dì dì 487487 487 条tiáo tiáo 的de de 拟议nǐ yì nǐ yì 修正案xiū zhèng àn xiū zhèng àn 仅jǐn jǐn 被bèi bèi 宣布xuān bù xuān bù ,, , 当时dāng shí dāng shí 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 通过tōng guò tōng guò 成为chéng wéi chéng wéi 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 。。 。
The verdict reflects accurate core facts with exaggerated and incomplete framing that presents a more damning picture than the full circumstances warrant.
(( ( 注zhù zhù :: : 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 修正案xiū zhèng àn xiū zhèng àn 后来hòu lái hòu lái 曾céng céng 被bèi bèi 提出tí chū tí chū 和hé hé 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn ,, , 但dàn dàn 面临miàn lín miàn lín 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 。。 。
)) )
33 3 .. . 该gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le 该gāi gāi 矿场kuàng chǎng kuàng chǎng 在zài zài 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 月yuè yuè 后hòu hòu 即jí jí 在zài zài 附加条件fù jiā tiáo jiàn fù jiā tiáo jiàn 下xià xià 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 获批huò pī huò pī 的de de 事实shì shí shì shí ,, , 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 程序chéng xù chéng xù 缺陷quē xiàn quē xiàn 已yǐ yǐ 通过tōng guò tōng guò 适当shì dàng shì dàng 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 程序chéng xù chéng xù 得到dé dào dé dào 纠正jiū zhèng jiū zhèng 的de de 事实shì shí shì shí 。。 。
该gāi gāi 裁决cái jué cái jué 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 了le le 核心hé xīn hé xīn 事实shì shí shì shí 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què ,, , 但dàn dàn 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 夸大kuā dà kuā dà 且qiě qiě 不bù bù 完整wán zhěng wán zhěng ,, , 呈现出chéng xiàn chū chéng xiàn chū 的de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 比bǐ bǐ 完整wán zhěng wán zhěng 事实shì shí shì shí 所suǒ suǒ 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì 的de de 更为严重gèng wéi yán zhòng gèng wéi yán zhòng 。。 。

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。