部分属实

评分: 6.5/10

Coalition
C0368

声明内容

“再次削减大学拨款,这次削减2.5%。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 2.5%2.5% 2.5% 大学dà xué dà xué 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 的de de 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ ** * ** * 在zài zài 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng 是shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de ** * ** * 。。 。
The claim of a 2.5% university funding cut by the Coalition government is **factually accurate**.
在zài zài 20172017 2017 年nián nián 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 预算yù suàn yù suàn 中zhōng zhōng ,, , CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 对duì duì 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 计划jì huà jì huà 实施shí shī shí shī 了le le "" " 效率xiào lǜ xiào lǜ 红利hóng lì hóng lì "" " ,, , 20182018 2018 年nián nián 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 2.5%2.5% 2.5% ,, , 20192019 2019 年nián nián 再zài zài 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 2.5%2.5% 2.5% [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
In the 2017 Federal Budget, the Coalition government implemented an "efficiency dividend" to the Commonwealth Grant Scheme of 2.5% in 2018 and another 2.5% in 2019 [1].
这zhè zhè 在zài zài 两年liǎng nián liǎng nián 内nèi nèi 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 了le le 3.8423.842 3.842 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
This resulted in a direct cut of $384.2 million over two years [1].
加上jiā shàng jiā shàng 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 指数化zhǐ shù huà zhǐ shù huà 方式fāng shì fāng shì 的de de 改变gǎi biàn gǎi biàn ,, , 大学dà xué dà xué 获得huò dé huò dé 的de de 学生xué shēng xué shēng 补贴bǔ tiē bǔ tiē 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
Combined with changes to how grants are indexed, universities received less per student in subsidies [1].
"" " 再次zài cì zài cì 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 大学dà xué dà xué 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn "" " 的de de 措辞cuò cí cuò cí 暗示àn shì àn shì 这是zhè shì zhè shì 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng 重复性chóng fù xìng chóng fù xìng 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 。。 。
The phrase "cut university funding again" suggests this was a repeated action.
CoalitionCoalition Coalition 确实què shí què shí 尝试cháng shì cháng shì 了le le 多轮duō lún duō lún 大学dà xué dà xué 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 。。 。
The Coalition did indeed attempt multiple rounds of university funding reductions.
20172017 2017 年nián nián 1212 12 月yuè yuè ,, , 联邦政府lián bāng zhèng fǔ lián bāng zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 中期zhōng qī zhōng qī 经济jīng jì jīng jì 和hé hé 财政cái zhèng cái zhèng 展望zhǎn wàng zhǎn wàng (( ( MYEFOMYEFO MYEFO )) ) 中zhōng zhōng 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 2222 22 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 大学dà xué dà xué 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
In December 2017, the Federal Government announced a $2.2 billion cut to university funding in its Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook (MYEFO) [2].
预算yù suàn yù suàn 措施cuò shī cuò shī 将jiāng jiāng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 每名měi míng měi míng 大学生dà xué shēng dà xué shēng 的de de 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 在zài zài 20222022 2022 -- - 2323 23 年度nián dù nián dù 实际shí jì shí jì 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 5.4%5.4% 5.4% ,, , 随后suí hòu suí hòu 两年liǎng nián liǎng nián 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 3.6%3.6% 3.6% [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
Budget measures cut government funding per university student by 5.4 percent in real terms for 2022-23 and 3.6 percent for the following two years [3].
此外cǐ wài cǐ wài ,, , CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 提出tí chū tí chū 并bìng bìng 部分bù fèn bù fèn 实施shí shī shí shī 了le le 大学dà xué dà xué 学费xué fèi xué fèi 解除管制jiě chú guǎn zhì jiě chú guǎn zhì ,, , 增加zēng jiā zēng jiā 了le le 学生xué shēng xué shēng 成本chéng běn chéng běn 。。 。
Additionally, the Coalition government proposed and partially implemented university fee deregulation, which increased student costs.
从cóng cóng 20182018 2018 年nián nián 起qǐ qǐ ,, , 根据gēn jù gēn jù CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè ,, , 在校生zài xiào shēng zài xiào shēng 和hé hé 未来wèi lái wèi lái 学生xué shēng xué shēng 的de de 大学dà xué dà xué 学费xué fèi xué fèi 在zài zài 四年sì nián sì nián 内nèi nèi 上涨shàng zhǎng shàng zhǎng 7.5%7.5% 7.5% [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
From 2018, university fees increased by 7.5% over four years for current and future students under Coalition policy [4].

缺失背景

虽然suī rán suī rán 关于guān yú guān yú 2.5%2.5% 2.5% 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 的de de 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 在zài zài 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què ,, , 但dàn dàn 它tā tā 忽略hū lüè hū lüè 了le le 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng :: :
While the claim is factually accurate regarding the 2.5% cut, it omits crucial context: **1.
** * ** * 11 1 .. . 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 下降xià jiàng xià jiàng 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu :: : ** * ** * 联邦政府lián bāng zhèng fǔ lián bāng zhèng fǔ 对duì duì 大学dà xué dà xué 的de de 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 从cóng cóng 19951995 1995 年nián nián 占zhàn zhàn 国内guó nèi guó nèi 生产总值shēng chǎn zǒng zhí shēng chǎn zǒng zhí 0.9%0.9% 0.9% 下降xià jiàng xià jiàng 到dào dào 20212021 2021 年nián nián 的de de 0.6%0.6% 0.6% ,, , 相当于xiāng dāng yú xiāng dāng yú 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 了le le 6565 65 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
Funding Decline is Not Unique to Coalition:** Federal government funding for universities fell from 0.9 percent of gross domestic product in 1995 to 0.6 percent in 2021, amounting to a $6.5 billion funding reduction [5].
这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 下降xià jiàng xià jiàng 在zài zài CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ (( ( 于yú yú 20222022 2022 年nián nián 结束jié shù jié shù )) ) 之前zhī qián zhī qián 就jiù jiù 已经yǐ jīng yǐ jīng 开始kāi shǐ kāi shǐ ,, , 并bìng bìng 持续chí xù chí xù 到dào dào 其后qí hòu qí hòu 。。 。
This decline predates and outlasts the Coalition government (which ended in 2022). **2.
** * ** * 22 2 .. . LaborLabor Labor 的de de 大学dà xué dà xué 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 记录jì lù jì lù :: : ** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ (( ( 20072007 2007 -- - 20132013 2013 年nián nián )) ) 也yě yě 实施shí shī shí shī 了le le 大学dà xué dà xué 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 。。 。
Labor's University Funding Record:** The Labor government (2007-2013) also implemented university funding cuts.
陆克文lù kè wén lù kè wén -- - 吉拉德jí lā dé jí lā dé 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 通过tōng guò tōng guò 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 整笔zhěng bǐ zhěng bǐ 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 、、 、 迫使pò shǐ pò shǐ 大学dà xué dà xué 根据gēn jù gēn jù 学生xué shēng xué shēng 入学rù xué rù xué 人数rén shù rén shù 竞争jìng zhēng jìng zhēng 资金zī jīn zī jīn ,, , 为wèi wèi 企业qǐ yè qǐ yè 重组chóng zǔ chóng zǔ 奠定diàn dìng diàn dìng 了le le 基础jī chǔ jī chǔ ,, , 随后suí hòu suí hòu 在zài zài 20122012 2012 -- - 1313 13 年nián nián 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 了le le 约yuē yuē 3030 30 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 的de de 高等教育gāo děng jiào yù gāo děng jiào yù 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
The Rudd-Gillard government laid the basis for pro-corporate restructuring by scrapping block funding and forcing universities to compete for funds based on enrolments, then cut tertiary education funding by some $3 billion in 2012-13 [5].
此外cǐ wài cǐ wài ,, , 根据gēn jù gēn jù LaborLabor Labor 最近zuì jìn zuì jìn 的de de 20222022 2022 年nián nián 预算yù suàn yù suàn ,, , 大学dà xué dà xué 面临miàn lín miàn lín 持续chí xù chí xù 压力yā lì yā lì ,, , LaborLabor Labor 实施shí shī shí shī 了le le 其qí qí 自己zì jǐ zì jǐ 备受bèi shòu bèi shòu 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì 的de de 高等教育gāo děng jiào yù gāo děng jiào yù 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
Additionally, under Labor's more recent 2022 budget, universities faced continued pressures, with Labor implementing its own controversial higher education changes [6]. **3.
** * ** * 33 3 .. . 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 的de de 意图yì tú yì tú :: : ** * ** * CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 将jiāng jiāng 2.5%2.5% 2.5% 效率xiào lǜ xiào lǜ 红利hóng lì hóng lì 定位dìng wèi dìng wèi 为wèi wèi 财政cái zhèng cái zhèng 压力yā lì yā lì 时期shí qī shí qī 的de de 成本chéng běn chéng běn 控制措施kòng zhì cuò shī kòng zhì cuò shī 。。 。
What the Cut Was Intended For:** The Coalition government framed the 2.5% efficiency dividend as a cost-containment measure during a period of fiscal pressure.
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì ,, , 此举cǐ jǔ cǐ jǔ 旨在zhǐ zài zhǐ zài 整合zhěng hé zhěng hé 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 预算yù suàn yù suàn 中zhōng zhōng 的de de 长期cháng qī cháng qī 超支chāo zhī chāo zhī ,, , 同时tóng shí tóng shí 提高tí gāo tí gāo 高等教育gāo děng jiào yù gāo děng jiào yù 的de de 可持续性kě chí xù xìng kě chí xù xìng [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The government stated it was designed to consolidate chronic overspending in the Federal Budget while simultaneously improving the sustainability of higher education [2]. **4.
** * ** * 44 4 .. . 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 障碍zhàng ài zhàng ài :: : ** * ** * 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 忽略hū lüè hū lüè 了le le CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 由于yóu yú yóu yú 强烈qiáng liè qiáng liè 的de de 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 而ér ér 无法wú fǎ wú fǎ 在zài zài 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 推动tuī dòng tuī dòng 学费xué fèi xué fèi 解除管制jiě chú guǎn zhì jiě chú guǎn zhì 和hé hé 其他qí tā qí tā 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 紧缩jǐn suō jǐn suō 措施cuò shī cuò shī [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。 。
Legislative Barriers:** The claim omits that the Coalition government was unable to push fee deregulation—and other key austerity measures—through the Senate because of intense public opposition [7].
这zhè zhè 意味着yì wèi zhe yì wèi zhe 一些yī xiē yī xiē 提议tí yì tí yì 的de de 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 按计划àn jì huà àn jì huà 实施shí shī shí shī 。。 。
This means some proposed cuts did not occur as planned. **5.
** * ** * 55 5 .. . 国际背景guó jì bèi jǐng guó jì bèi jǐng :: : ** * ** * 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 大学dà xué dà xué 协会xié huì xié huì 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì ,, , 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 计划jì huà jì huà 是shì shì 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 大学dà xué dà xué 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 的de de 最大zuì dà zuì dà 单一dān yī dān yī 来源lái yuán lái yuán ,, , 根据gēn jù gēn jù 全日制quán rì zhì quán rì zhì 同等tóng děng tóng děng 国内guó nèi guó nèi 学生xué shēng xué shēng 人数rén shù rén shù 分配fēn pèi fēn pèi [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。 。
International Context:** Universities Australia stated that the Commonwealth Grant Scheme was the biggest single source of Government funding for universities, allocated on the basis of the number of full-time equivalent domestic students [8].
2.5%2.5% 2.5% 的de de 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 适用shì yòng shì yòng 于yú yú 这zhè zhè 一yī yī 核心hé xīn hé xīn 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 机制jī zhì jī zhì ,, , 但dàn dàn 大学dà xué dà xué 还hái hái 获得huò dé huò dé 研究yán jiū yán jiū 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 和hé hé 学生xué shēng xué shēng 缴费jiǎo fèi jiǎo fèi 收入shōu rù shōu rù 。。 。
The 2.5% cut was applied to this core funding mechanism, but universities also received research funding and student contribution revenue.

来源可信度评估

提供tí gōng tí gōng 的de de 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán (( ( BuzzFeedBuzzFeed BuzzFeed // / AliceAlice Alice WorkmanWorkman Workman )) ) ** * ** * 可信度kě xìn dù kě xìn dù 中等zhōng děng zhōng děng 但dàn dàn 存在cún zài cún zài 明显míng xiǎn míng xiǎn 局限jú xiàn jú xiàn ** * ** * :: :
The original source provided (BuzzFeed/Alice Workman) is **semi-credible but has notable limitations**: **Strengths:** - Alice Workman is a political reporter based in Canberra with extensive coverage of education policy [9] - BuzzFeed News conducts investigative journalism on policy issues - The articles are based on government announcements and reported facts rather than pure opinion **Limitations:** - BuzzFeed has a left-leaning editorial stance, which may influence story selection and framing - The headline "It's Official: University Fees Are Going Up" frames the issue negatively without acknowledging the government's policy rationale - BuzzFeed articles tend to focus on impacts on students rather than providing balanced policy analysis - The reporting is generally accurate on facts but selective in what information is highlighted The BuzzFeed source is appropriate for establishing what policy changes occurred, but its framing tends toward criticism of Coalition policies without equally examining Labor's record on similar issues.
** * ** * 优点yōu diǎn yōu diǎn :: : ** * ** *
-- - AliceAlice Alice WorkmanWorkman Workman 是shì shì 驻zhù zhù 堪培拉kān péi lā kān péi lā 的de de 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 记者jì zhě jì zhě ,, , 对duì duì 教育jiào yù jiào yù 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 有yǒu yǒu 大量dà liàng dà liàng 报道bào dào bào dào [[ [ 99 9 ]] ]
-- - BuzzFeedBuzzFeed BuzzFeed NewsNews News 对duì duì 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 问题wèn tí wèn tí 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 调查diào chá diào chá 性xìng xìng 新闻报道xīn wén bào dào xīn wén bào dào
-- - 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 基于jī yú jī yú 政府公告zhèng fǔ gōng gào zhèng fǔ gōng gào 和hé hé 报道bào dào bào dào 的de de 事实shì shí shì shí ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 纯粹chún cuì chún cuì 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn
** * ** * 局限jú xiàn jú xiàn :: : ** * ** *
-- - BuzzFeedBuzzFeed BuzzFeed 的de de 编辑biān jí biān jí 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 偏左piān zuǒ piān zuǒ ,, , 可能kě néng kě néng 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 报道bào dào bào dào 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 和hé hé 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià
-- - 标题biāo tí biāo tí "" " 官方guān fāng guān fāng 确认què rèn què rèn :: : 大学dà xué dà xué 学费xué fèi xué fèi 将jiāng jiāng 上涨shàng zhǎng shàng zhǎng "" " 以yǐ yǐ 负面fù miàn fù miàn 方式fāng shì fāng shì 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 问题wèn tí wèn tí ,, , 未wèi wèi 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 依据yī jù yī jù
-- - BuzzFeedBuzzFeed BuzzFeed 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng 于yú yú 关注guān zhù guān zhù 对duì duì 学生xué shēng xué shēng 的de de 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 提供tí gōng tí gōng 平衡píng héng píng héng 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 分析fēn xī fēn xī
-- - 报道bào dào bào dào 在zài zài 事实shì shí shì shí 层面céng miàn céng miàn 总体zǒng tǐ zǒng tǐ 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què ,, , 但dàn dàn 对duì duì 突出tū chū tū chū 信息xìn xī xìn xī 的de de 选择性xuǎn zé xìng xuǎn zé xìng 较强jiào qiáng jiào qiáng
BuzzFeedBuzzFeed BuzzFeed 来源lái yuán lái yuán 适用shì yòng shì yòng 于yú yú 确定què dìng què dìng 发生fā shēng fā shēng 了le le 哪些nǎ xiē nǎ xiē 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 变化biàn huà biàn huà ,, , 但dàn dàn 其qí qí 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng 于yú yú 批评pī píng pī píng CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè ,, , 而ér ér 未wèi wèi 同等tóng děng tóng děng 审视shěn shì shěn shì LaborLabor Labor 在zài zài 类似lèi sì lèi sì 问题wèn tí wèn tí 上shàng shàng 的de de 记录jì lù jì lù 。。 。
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做zuò zuò 了le le 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng ?? ?
**Did Labor do something similar?** **Yes, extensively.** The Labor government (2007-2013) made significant changes to university funding: 1. **Block Funding Elimination:** Labor scrapped the block funding system and forced universities to compete for funds based on student enrolments, fundamentally changing university funding mechanisms [5].
** * ** *
This market-based approach arguably put more pressure on universities than targeted efficiency cuts. 2. **Direct Funding Cuts:** Labor cut tertiary education funding by approximately $3 billion in 2012-13 [5].
** * ** * 是shì shì 的de de ,, , 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 地dì dì 做zuò zuò 了le le 。。 。
Adjusted for inflation, this represents a larger absolute cut than the Coalition's 2.5% efficiency dividend. 3. **Fee Structure Changes:** Labor's system of forcing universities to compete for student-based funding effectively incentivized higher fees to universities, as they needed to attract enrollment-based funding. 4. **Recent Labor Cuts:** Under Labor's 2022 budget, the government made controversial changes to university funding, including cutting funding to certain courses and implementing new restrictions [6].
** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ (( ( 20072007 2007 -- - 20132013 2013 年nián nián )) ) 对duì duì 大学dà xué dà xué 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 了le le 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 改变gǎi biàn gǎi biàn :: :
Federal government funding for universities fell from 0.9% of GDP in 1995 to 0.6% in 2021, a period that includes both Coalition (2013-2022) and Labor (2007-2013, 2022-present) governments [5]. **Comparison:** Both major parties have cut or restructured university funding.
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 整笔zhěng bǐ zhěng bǐ 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo :: : ** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 了le le 整笔zhěng bǐ zhěng bǐ 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 制度zhì dù zhì dù ,, , 迫使pò shǐ pò shǐ 大学dà xué dà xué 根据gēn jù gēn jù 学生xué shēng xué shēng 入学rù xué rù xué 人数rén shù rén shù 竞争jìng zhēng jìng zhēng 资金zī jīn zī jīn ,, , 从根本上cóng gēn běn shàng cóng gēn běn shàng 改变gǎi biàn gǎi biàn 了le le 大学dà xué dà xué 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 机制jī zhì jī zhì [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
Labor's cuts were arguably more systemic (eliminating block funding entirely), while the Coalition's cuts were more incremental (efficiency dividends).
这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 市场化shì chǎng huà shì chǎng huà 方式fāng shì fāng shì arguablyarguably arguably 给gěi gěi 大学dà xué dà xué 带来dài lái dài lái 的de de 压力yā lì yā lì 大于dà yú dà yú 有yǒu yǒu 针对性zhēn duì xìng zhēn duì xìng 的de de 效率xiào lǜ xiào lǜ 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 。。 。
The claim's use of "again" suggests repeated Coalition actions, but it omits that Labor also implemented significant university funding reductions.
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn :: : ** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 在zài zài 20122012 2012 -- - 1313 13 年nián nián 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 了le le 约yuē yuē 3030 30 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 的de de 高等教育gāo děng jiào yù gāo děng jiào yù 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
按àn àn 通胀tōng zhàng tōng zhàng 调整tiáo zhěng tiáo zhěng 后hòu hòu ,, , 这zhè zhè 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 了le le 比bǐ bǐ CoalitionCoalition Coalition 2.5%2.5% 2.5% 效率xiào lǜ xiào lǜ 红利hóng lì hóng lì 更大gèng dà gèng dà 的de de 绝对jué duì jué duì 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 。。 。
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 学费xué fèi xué fèi 结构jié gòu jié gòu 变化biàn huà biàn huà :: : ** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 迫使pò shǐ pò shǐ 大学dà xué dà xué 竞争jìng zhēng jìng zhēng 基于jī yú jī yú 学生xué shēng xué shēng 的de de 资金zī jīn zī jīn 的de de 制度zhì dù zhì dù 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 激励jī lì jī lì 了le le 大学dà xué dà xué 收取shōu qǔ shōu qǔ 更高gèng gāo gèng gāo 学费xué fèi xué fèi ,, , 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi 它们tā men tā men 需要xū yào xū yào 吸引xī yǐn xī yǐn 基于jī yú jī yú 入学rù xué rù xué 人数rén shù rén shù 的de de 资金zī jīn zī jīn 。。 。
44 4 .. . ** * ** * 最近zuì jìn zuì jìn 的de de LaborLabor Labor 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn :: : ** * ** * 根据gēn jù gēn jù LaborLabor Labor 的de de 20222022 2022 年nián nián 预算yù suàn yù suàn ,, , 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 对duì duì 大学dà xué dà xué 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 了le le 有yǒu yǒu 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì 的de de 改变gǎi biàn gǎi biàn ,, , 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 某些mǒu xiē mǒu xiē 课程kè chéng kè chéng 的de de 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 和hé hé 实施shí shī shí shī 新xīn xīn 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
联邦政府lián bāng zhèng fǔ lián bāng zhèng fǔ 对duì duì 大学dà xué dà xué 的de de 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 从cóng cóng 19951995 1995 年nián nián 占zhàn zhàn GDPGDP GDP 的de de 0.9%0.9% 0.9% 下降xià jiàng xià jiàng 到dào dào 20212021 2021 年nián nián 的de de 0.6%0.6% 0.6% ,, , 这zhè zhè 一时期yī shí qī yī shí qī 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò CoalitionCoalition Coalition (( ( 20132013 2013 -- - 20222022 2022 年nián nián )) ) 和hé hé LaborLabor Labor (( ( 20072007 2007 -- - 20132013 2013 年nián nián 、、 、 20222022 2022 年nián nián 至今zhì jīn zhì jīn )) ) 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào :: : ** * ** * 两大liǎng dà liǎng dà 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 都dōu dōu 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 或huò huò 重组chóng zǔ chóng zǔ 了le le 大学dà xué dà xué 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 。。 。
LaborLabor Labor 的de de 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn arguablyarguably arguably 更加gèng jiā gèng jiā 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng (( ( 完全wán quán wán quán 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 整笔zhěng bǐ zhěng bǐ 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn )) ) ,, , 而ér ér CoalitionCoalition Coalition 的de de 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 更加gèng jiā gèng jiā 渐进jiàn jìn jiàn jìn (( ( 效率xiào lǜ xiào lǜ 红利hóng lì hóng lì )) ) 。。 。
该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng "" " 再次zài cì zài cì "" " 暗示àn shì àn shì CoalitionCoalition Coalition 的de de 重复chóng fù chóng fù 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng ,, , 但dàn dàn 忽略hū lüè hū lüè 了le le LaborLabor Labor 也yě yě 实施shí shī shí shī 了le le 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 大学dà xué dà xué 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

** * ** * 支持zhī chí zhī chí 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 的de de 论点lùn diǎn lùn diǎn (( ( 对duì duì CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 的de de 批评pī píng pī píng )) ) :: : ** * ** *
**Arguments Supporting the Claim (Criticisms of Coalition Policy):** The Coalition's 2.5% efficiency dividend was unpopular with the university sector.
CoalitionCoalition Coalition 的de de 2.5%2.5% 2.5% 效率xiào lǜ xiào lǜ 红利hóng lì hóng lì 在zài zài 大学dà xué dà xué 界jiè jiè 不bù bù 受欢迎shòu huān yíng shòu huān yíng 。。 。
Universities Australia and major university groups opposed the cuts, arguing they would reduce per-student funding and harm educational quality [2].
澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 大学dà xué dà xué 协会xié huì xié huì 和hé hé 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 大学dà xué dà xué 团体tuán tǐ tuán tǐ 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn ,, , 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 它们tā men tā men 将jiāng jiāng 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 生shēng shēng 均jūn jūn 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 并bìng bìng 损害sǔn hài sǔn hài 教育jiào yù jiào yù 质量zhì liàng zhì liàng [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The cuts occurred during a period when universities were already facing financial pressures from declining international student enrollment and COVID-19 impacts [3].
削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 发生fā shēng fā shēng 在zài zài 大学dà xué dà xué 已经yǐ jīng yǐ jīng 面临miàn lín miàn lín 国际guó jì guó jì 学生xué shēng xué shēng 入学rù xué rù xué 人数rén shù rén shù 下降xià jiàng xià jiàng 和hé hé COVIDCOVID COVID -- - 1919 19 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 带来dài lái dài lái 的de de 财务cái wù cái wù 压力yā lì yā lì 时期shí qī shí qī [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
The claim that the cut occurred "again" is justified—the Coalition did implement multiple rounds of funding reductions and attempted even larger fee deregulation that would have shifted costs to students. **Arguments Providing Context (Coalition Rationale):** 1. **Fiscal Context:** The Coalition government argued the efficiency dividend was necessary to address fiscal challenges and improve the long-term sustainability of the higher education system [2].
削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn "" " 再次zài cì zài cì "" " 发生fā shēng fā shēng 的de de 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 是shì shì 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 的de de —— — —— — CoalitionCoalition Coalition 确实què shí què shí 实施shí shī shí shī 了le le 多轮duō lún duō lún 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn ,, , 并bìng bìng 试图shì tú shì tú 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 更大gèng dà gèng dà 的de de 学费xué fèi xué fèi 解除管制jiě chú guǎn zhì jiě chú guǎn zhì ,, , 这zhè zhè 将jiāng jiāng 把bǎ bǎ 成本chéng běn chéng běn 转嫁给zhuǎn jià gěi zhuǎn jià gěi 学生xué shēng xué shēng 。。 。
The government had inherited budget deficits from the Global Financial Crisis period and faced ongoing pressure to reduce expenditure. 2. **Structural Issues:** The Coalition government believed universities faced structural challenges, including administrative bloat, that justified efficiency measures.
** * ** * 提供tí gōng tí gōng 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 的de de 论点lùn diǎn lùn diǎn (( ( CoalitionCoalition Coalition 的de de 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu )) ) :: : ** * ** *
The 2.5% cut was framed as requiring universities to operate more efficiently rather than reduce student places. 3. **Student Access Maintained:** The Coalition maintained Commonwealth-supported places and did not significantly reduce student access to higher education, despite the funding cut.
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 财政cái zhèng cái zhèng 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng :: : ** * ** * CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 效率xiào lǜ xiào lǜ 红利hóng lì hóng lì 对于duì yú duì yú 应对yìng duì yìng duì 财政cái zhèng cái zhèng 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn 和hé hé 提高tí gāo tí gāo 高等教育gāo děng jiào yù gāo děng jiào yù 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng 的de de 长期cháng qī cháng qī 可持续性kě chí xù xìng kě chí xù xìng 是shì shì 必要bì yào bì yào 的de de [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The major controversy was around fee deregulation, which the Senate ultimately blocked [7]. 4. **Both Parties' Problem:** The broader decline in university funding (from 0.9% to 0.6% of GDP) spans both Labor and Coalition governments [5].
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 继承jì chéng jì chéng 了le le 全球quán qiú quán qiú 金融危机jīn róng wēi jī jīn róng wēi jī 时期shí qī shí qī 的de de 预算赤字yù suàn chì zì yù suàn chì zì ,, , 并bìng bìng 面临miàn lín miàn lín 持续chí xù chí xù 的de de 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 支出zhī chū zhī chū 压力yā lì yā lì 。。 。
This suggests university underfunding is a long-term systemic issue rather than a problem unique to the Coalition. 5. **Universities' Other Revenue Streams:** While Commonwealth funding declined as a percentage of university budgets, universities expanded international student fees, research contracts, and philanthropic funding.
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 结构性jié gòu xìng jié gòu xìng 问题wèn tí wèn tí :: : ** * ** * CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 大学dà xué dà xué 面临miàn lín miàn lín 结构性jié gòu xìng jié gòu xìng 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn ,, , 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng 臃肿yōng zhǒng yōng zhǒng ,, , 这zhè zhè 证明zhèng míng zhèng míng 了le le 效率xiào lǜ xiào lǜ 措施cuò shī cuò shī 的de de 合理性hé lǐ xìng hé lǐ xìng 。。 。
Government funding fell from being the dominant source to approximately 40-50% of university revenue by 2022 [8].
2.5%2.5% 2.5% 的de de 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 被bèi bèi 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 为wèi wèi 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 大学dà xué dà xué 更gèng gèng 高效gāo xiào gāo xiào 运营yùn yíng yùn yíng ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 学生xué shēng xué shēng 名额míng é míng é 。。 。
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 维持wéi chí wéi chí 学生xué shēng xué shēng 入学rù xué rù xué :: : ** * ** * 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn ,, , CoalitionCoalition Coalition 维持wéi chí wéi chí 了le le 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 支持zhī chí zhī chí 名额míng é míng é ,, , 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 显著xiǎn zhù xiǎn zhù 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 学生xué shēng xué shēng 接受jiē shòu jiē shòu 高等教育gāo děng jiào yù gāo děng jiào yù 的de de 机会jī huì jī huì 。。 。
主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì 围绕wéi rào wéi rào 学费xué fèi xué fèi 解除管制jiě chú guǎn zhì jiě chú guǎn zhì ,, , 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ 了le le 该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。 。
44 4 .. . ** * ** * 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 共同gòng tóng gòng tóng 的de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí :: : ** * ** * 大学dà xué dà xué 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 的de de 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 下降xià jiàng xià jiàng (( ( 从cóng cóng 占zhàn zhàn GDPGDP GDP 的de de 0.9%0.9% 0.9% 到dào dào 0.6%0.6% 0.6% )) ) 跨越kuà yuè kuà yuè 了le le LaborLabor Labor 和hé hé CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 大学dà xué dà xué 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 不足bù zú bù zú 是shì shì 一个yí gè yí gè 长期cháng qī cháng qī 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 问题wèn tí wèn tí ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu 的de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí 。。 。
55 5 .. . ** * ** * 大学dà xué dà xué 的de de 其他qí tā qí tā 收入shōu rù shōu rù 来源lái yuán lái yuán :: : ** * ** * 虽然suī rán suī rán 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 在zài zài 大学dà xué dà xué 预算yù suàn yù suàn 中zhōng zhōng 的de de 占zhàn zhàn 比bǐ bǐ 下降xià jiàng xià jiàng ,, , 但dàn dàn 大学dà xué dà xué 扩大kuò dà kuò dà 了le le 国际guó jì guó jì 学生xué shēng xué shēng 学费xué fèi xué fèi 、、 、 研究yán jiū yán jiū 合同hé tóng hé tóng 和hé hé 慈善cí shàn cí shàn 资金zī jīn zī jīn 。。 。
到dào dào 20222022 2022 年nián nián ,, , 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 从cóng cóng 主导地位zhǔ dǎo dì wèi zhǔ dǎo dì wèi 下降xià jiàng xià jiàng 到dào dào 约yuē yuē 占zhàn zhàn 大学dà xué dà xué 收入shōu rù shōu rù 的de de 4040 40 -- - 50%50% 50% [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。 。

部分属实

6.5

/ 10

20172017 2017 年nián nián 预算yù suàn yù suàn 中zhōng zhōng 对duì duì 大学dà xué dà xué 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 的de de 2.5%2.5% 2.5% 效率xiào lǜ xiào lǜ 红利hóng lì hóng lì 确实què shí què shí 发生fā shēng fā shēng 了le le ,, , 这是zhè shì zhè shì 一个yí gè yí gè 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de 事实陈述shì shí chén shù shì shí chén shù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The 2.5% efficiency dividend to university funding in the 2017 Budget did occur and is an accurate factual statement [1].
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 在zài zài 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng :: :
However, the claim is misleading in several respects: 1. **Framing Issue:** The word "again" suggests unique or repeated Coalition aggression toward universities, when in fact both Labor and Coalition governments have reduced university funding in real terms [5]. 2. **Incomplete Picture:** The claim omits that Labor's previous government (2007-2013) implemented larger structural cuts to university funding by eliminating block funding and cutting $3 billion from tertiary education [5]. 3. **Context Omission:** The claim doesn't acknowledge the Coalition's stated policy rationale (fiscal sustainability) or that the Senate blocked more extensive fee deregulation proposals [7]. 4. **Systemic Issue:** The broader decline in government university funding is bipartisan and long-term (1995-2022), not a Coalition-specific problem [5].
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 问题wèn tí wèn tí :: : ** * ** * "" " 再次zài cì zài cì "" " 一词yī cí yī cí 暗示àn shì àn shì CoalitionCoalition Coalition 对duì duì 大学dà xué dà xué 的de de 独特dú tè dú tè 或huò huò 重复性chóng fù xìng chóng fù xìng 攻击gōng jī gōng jī ,, , 而ér ér 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng LaborLabor Labor 和hé hé CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 都dōu dōu 在zài zài 实际意义shí jì yì yì shí jì yì yì 上shàng shàng 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 了le le 大学dà xué dà xué 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
The claim accurately identifies a real policy action but selectively frames it as if the Coalition uniquely attacked university funding, when both parties have implemented funding reductions.
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 不bù bù 完整wán zhěng wán zhěng 的de de 图景tú jǐng tú jǐng :: : ** * ** * 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 忽略hū lüè hū lüè 了le le LaborLabor Labor 上届shàng jiè shàng jiè 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ (( ( 20072007 2007 -- - 20132013 2013 年nián nián )) ) 通过tōng guò tōng guò 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 整笔zhěng bǐ zhěng bǐ 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 和hé hé 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 3030 30 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 高等教育gāo děng jiào yù gāo děng jiào yù 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn ,, , 实施shí shī shí shī 了le le 更gèng gèng 大dà dà 的de de 结构性jié gòu xìng jié gòu xìng 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu :: : ** * ** * 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 未wèi wèi 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn CoalitionCoalition Coalition 声明shēng míng shēng míng 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 依据yī jù yī jù (( ( 财政cái zhèng cái zhèng 可持续性kě chí xù xìng kě chí xù xìng )) ) ,, , 也yě yě 未wèi wèi 提及tí jí tí jí 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ 了le le 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 学费xué fèi xué fèi 解除管制jiě chú guǎn zhì jiě chú guǎn zhì 提议tí yì tí yì [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。 。
44 4 .. . ** * ** * 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 问题wèn tí wèn tí :: : ** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 大学dà xué dà xué 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 的de de 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 下降xià jiàng xià jiàng 是shì shì 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 共同gòng tóng gòng tóng 造成zào chéng zào chéng 的de de 长期cháng qī cháng qī 问题wèn tí wèn tí (( ( 19951995 1995 -- - 20222022 2022 年nián nián )) ) ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 特有tè yǒu tè yǒu 的de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 识别shí bié shí bié 了le le 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng ,, , 但dàn dàn 有yǒu yǒu 选择性xuǎn zé xìng xuǎn zé xìng 地dì dì 将jiāng jiāng 其qí qí 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 为wèi wèi 好像hǎo xiàng hǎo xiàng CoalitionCoalition Coalition 独特dú tè dú tè 地dì dì 攻击gōng jī gōng jī 了le le 大学dà xué dà xué 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn ,, , 而ér ér 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 都dōu dōu 实施shí shī shí shī 了le le 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 。。 。

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。