属实

评分: 7.0/10

Coalition
C0083

声明内容

“提交了法律修正案,如果慈善机构在推特上支持公众抗议,或在专员怀疑有无关联的抗议者已经或可能犯下轻微违法行为(如阻塞人行道)的抗议活动中展示其标志,这些修正案将导致慈善机构失去免税资格。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 的de de 核心hé xīn hé xīn 事实shì shí shì shí 为wèi wèi ** * ** * 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí ** * ** * [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The core facts of this claim are **TRUE** [1][2].
MorrisonMorrison Morrison 领导lǐng dǎo lǐng dǎo 的de de CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 在zài zài 20212021 2021 年nián nián 66 6 月yuè yuè 提交tí jiāo tí jiāo 了le le 《《 《 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 慈善cí shàn cí shàn 和hé hé 非营利fēi yíng lì fēi yíng lì 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì (( ( ACNCACNC ACNC )) ) 法规fǎ guī fǎ guī 》》 》 修正案xiū zhèng àn xiū zhèng àn ,, , 该gāi gāi 修正案xiū zhèng àn xiū zhèng àn 将jiāng jiāng 扩大kuò dà kuò dà 慈善机构cí shàn jī gòu cí shàn jī gòu 注销zhù xiāo zhù xiāo 登记dēng jì dēng jì 的de de 依据yī jù yī jù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The Morrison Coalition government did table amendments to the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission (ACNC) Regulations in June 2021 that would have expanded the grounds for charity deregistration [1][2]. **Specific regulatory change:** The amendments sought to extend Governance Standard 3 of the ACNC Regulations by lowering the threshold from requiring charities to avoid conduct punishable as an "indictable offence" down to conduct that could be dealt with as a "summary offence" [3].
** * ** * 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 法规fǎ guī fǎ guī 变更biàn gēng biàn gēng :: : ** * ** * 该gāi gāi 修正案xiū zhèng àn xiū zhèng àn 试图shì tú shì tú 通过tōng guò tōng guò 将jiāng jiāng 门槛mén kǎn mén kǎn 从cóng cóng 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 慈善机构cí shàn jī gòu cí shàn jī gòu 避免bì miǎn bì miǎn "" " 可kě kě 公诉gōng sù gōng sù 罪行zuì xíng zuì xíng "" " 的de de 处罚chǔ fá chǔ fá 降低jiàng dī jiàng dī 到dào dào 可能kě néng kě néng 按àn àn "" " 简易程序jiǎn yì chéng xù jiǎn yì chéng xù 罪行zuì xíng zuì xíng "" " 处理chǔ lǐ chǔ lǐ 的de de 违法行为wéi fǎ xíng wéi wéi fǎ xíng wéi ,, , 来lái lái 扩展kuò zhǎn kuò zhǎn ACNCACNC ACNC 法规fǎ guī fǎ guī 的de de 治理zhì lǐ zhì lǐ 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 33 3 [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
Summary offences in the proposed regulation specifically included: (i) entering or remaining on real or personal property; (ii) destroying or damaging property; (iii) appropriating property; and (iv) causing personal injury [3]. **Practical impact:** Under these regulations, charities could theoretically be deregistered for staff members blocking a footpath at a public vigil, or for tweeting in support of a protest [1][2].
拟议nǐ yì nǐ yì 法规fǎ guī fǎ guī 中zhōng zhōng 特别tè bié tè bié 提到tí dào tí dào 的de de 简易程序jiǎn yì chéng xù jiǎn yì chéng xù 罪行zuì xíng zuì xíng 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò :: : (( ( ii i )) ) 进入jìn rù jìn rù 或huò huò 停留tíng liú tíng liú 在zài zài 不动产bù dòng chǎn bù dòng chǎn 或huò huò 个人财产gè rén cái chǎn gè rén cái chǎn 上shàng shàng ;; ; (( ( iiii ii )) ) 破坏pò huài pò huài 或huò huò 损坏sǔn huài sǔn huài 财产cái chǎn cái chǎn ;; ; (( ( iiiiii iii )) ) 挪用nuó yòng nuó yòng 财产cái chǎn cái chǎn ;; ; 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí (( ( iviv iv )) ) 造成zào chéng zào chéng 人身rén shēn rén shēn 伤害shāng hài shāng hài [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
The regulations gave the Charities Commissioner "subjective belief" authority to act even if no charge had been made [1]. **What actually happened:** The regulations were **never implemented**.
** * ** * 实际shí jì shí jì 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng :: : ** * ** * 根据gēn jù gēn jù 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 法规fǎ guī fǎ guī ,, , 慈善机构cí shàn jī gòu cí shàn jī gòu 理论lǐ lùn lǐ lùn 上shàng shàng 可能kě néng kě néng 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi 工作人员gōng zuò rén yuán gōng zuò rén yuán 在zài zài 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng 守夜shǒu yè shǒu yè 活动huó dòng huó dòng 中zhōng zhōng 阻塞zǔ sè zǔ sè 人行道rén xíng dào rén xíng dào ,, , 或huò huò 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi 在zài zài 推特上tuī tè shàng tuī tè shàng 支持zhī chí zhī chí 抗议kàng yì kàng yì 活动huó dòng huó dòng 而ér ér 被bèi bèi 注销zhù xiāo zhù xiāo 登记dēng jì dēng jì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
On 25 November 2021, the Senate voted 24-19 in favor of Independent Senator Rex Patrick's disallowance motion, preventing the regulations from ever coming into effect [4][5].
这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 法规fǎ guī fǎ guī 赋予fù yǔ fù yǔ 慈善cí shàn cí shàn 专员zhuān yuán zhuān yuán 基于jī yú jī yú "" " 主观zhǔ guān zhǔ guān 信念xìn niàn xìn niàn "" " 的de de 权力quán lì quán lì ,, , 即使jí shǐ jí shǐ 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 提出tí chū tí chū 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng 也yě yě 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ 采取行动cǎi qǔ xíng dòng cǎi qǔ xíng dòng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 实际shí jì shí jì 发生fā shēng fā shēng 的de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng :: : ** * ** * 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 法规fǎ guī fǎ guī ** * ** * 从未cóng wèi cóng wèi 实施shí shī shí shī ** * ** * 。。 。
20212021 2021 年nián nián 1111 11 月yuè yuè 2525 25 日rì rì ,, , 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 以yǐ yǐ 2424 24 票piào piào 对duì duì 1919 19 票piào piào 通过tōng guò tōng guò 了le le 独立dú lì dú lì 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán RexRex Rex PatrickPatrick Patrick 提出tí chū tí chū 的de de 否决fǒu jué fǒu jué 动议dòng yì dòng yì ,, , 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 法规fǎ guī fǎ guī 生效shēng xiào shēng xiào [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。

缺失背景

然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 需要xū yào xū yào 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 的de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 信息xìn xī xìn xī 才能cái néng cái néng 被bèi bèi 充分chōng fèn chōng fèn 理解lǐ jiě lǐ jiě :: :
However, the claim requires significant context to be fully understood: **1.
** * ** * 11 1 .. . 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 法规fǎ guī fǎ guī 从未cóng wèi cóng wèi 成为chéng wéi chéng wéi 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 。。 。
The regulations never became law.** While the claim accurately describes what was tabled, it could mislead readers into believing these rules were implemented.
** * ** * 虽然suī rán suī rán 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 描述miáo shù miáo shù 了le le 提交tí jiāo tí jiāo 的de de 内容nèi róng nèi róng ,, , 但dàn dàn 可能kě néng kě néng 会huì huì 误导wù dǎo wù dǎo 读者dú zhě dú zhě 相信xiāng xìn xiāng xìn 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 规则guī zé guī zé 已经yǐ jīng yǐ jīng 实施shí shī shí shī 。。 。
They were defeated in the Senate and never came into effect [4][5]. **2.
它们tā men tā men 在zài zài 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 被bèi bèi 否决fǒu jué fǒu jué ,, , 从未cóng wèi cóng wèi 生效shēng xiào shēng xiào [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
The government's stated rationale.** Assistant Treasurer Michael Sukkar defended the regulations as targeting "activist organisations masquerading as charities" and preventing charities' resources from being directed toward "unlawful activities" rather than charitable works [2].
** * ** * 22 2 .. . 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de statedstated stated rationalerationale rationale (( ( statedstated stated 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu )) ) 。。 。
The government stated the regulator would take a "proportionate" approach to enforcement [2]. **3.
** * ** * 助理zhù lǐ zhù lǐ 财政部长cái zhèng bù zhǎng cái zhèng bù zhǎng MichaelMichael Michael SukkarSukkar Sukkar 为wèi wèi 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 法规fǎ guī fǎ guī 辩护biàn hù biàn hù ,, , 称其chēng qí chēng qí 目标mù biāo mù biāo 是shì shì 打击dǎ jī dǎ jī "" " 伪装成wěi zhuāng chéng wěi zhuāng chéng 慈善机构cí shàn jī gòu cí shàn jī gòu 的de de 激进jī jìn jī jìn 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī "" " ,, , 防止fáng zhǐ fáng zhǐ 慈善机构cí shàn jī gòu cí shàn jī gòu 的de de 资源zī yuán zī yuán 被bèi bèi 用于yòng yú yòng yú "" " 非法活动fēi fǎ huó dòng fēi fǎ huó dòng "" " 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 慈善cí shàn cí shàn 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The charities regulator (ACNC Commissioner) said the problem didn't exist.** The head of the ACNC itself confirmed that "very few charities are acting illegally" and questioned the necessity of the regulations [6].
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 机构jī gòu jī gòu 将jiāng jiāng 采取cǎi qǔ cǎi qǔ "" " 相称xiāng chèn xiāng chèn 的de de "" " 执法zhí fǎ zhí fǎ 方式fāng shì fāng shì [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
This significantly undermined the government's justification for the changes. **4.
** * ** * 33 3 .. . 慈善cí shàn cí shàn 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 机构jī gòu jī gòu (( ( ACNCACNC ACNC 专员zhuān yuán zhuān yuán )) ) 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 问题wèn tí wèn tí 并bìng bìng 不bù bù 存在cún zài cún zài 。。 。
Sukkar's office clarified the regulations were aimed at "sustained illegal activity."** In response to charity concerns, Sukkar's office clarified that the regulations were not intended to result in deregistration for a single staff member's tweet, but rather sustained illegal activity [2].
** * ** * ACNCACNC ACNC 负责人fù zé rén fù zé rén 本人běn rén běn rén 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí "" " 很少hěn shǎo hěn shǎo 有yǒu yǒu 慈善机构cí shàn jī gòu cí shàn jī gòu 从事cóng shì cóng shì 非法活动fēi fǎ huó dòng fēi fǎ huó dòng "" " ,, , 并bìng bìng 对duì duì 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 法规fǎ guī fǎ guī 的de de 必要性bì yào xìng bì yào xìng 提出tí chū tí chū 质疑zhì yí zhì yí [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
However, charities remained skeptical about whether such safeguards would actually protect them in practice. **5.
这zhè zhè 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 削弱xuē ruò xuē ruò 了le le 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 对duì duì 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 变更biàn gēng biàn gēng 的de de 合理性hé lǐ xìng hé lǐ xìng 论证lùn zhèng lùn zhèng 。。 。
Precedent was limited.** The only recent example cited was the 2019 deregistration of Aussie Farms Inc., an animal rights group that had organized protests [2].
** * ** * 44 4 .. . SukkarSukkar Sukkar 办公室bàn gōng shì bàn gōng shì 澄清chéng qīng chéng qīng 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 法规fǎ guī fǎ guī 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 的de de 是shì shì "" " 持续chí xù chí xù 的de de 非法活动fēi fǎ huó dòng fēi fǎ huó dòng "" " 。。 。
This single case hardly justified sweeping regulatory overhaul.
** * ** * 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 慈善机构cí shàn jī gòu cí shàn jī gòu 的de de 担忧dān yōu dān yōu ,, , SukkarSukkar Sukkar 办公室bàn gōng shì bàn gōng shì 澄清chéng qīng chéng qīng 说shuō shuō ,, , 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 法规fǎ guī fǎ guī 的de de 目的mù dì mù dì 不是bú shì bú shì 因yīn yīn 单个dān gè dān gè 工作人员gōng zuò rén yuán gōng zuò rén yuán 的de de 推文tuī wén tuī wén 而ér ér 导致dǎo zhì dǎo zhì 注销zhù xiāo zhù xiāo 登记dēng jì dēng jì ,, , 而是ér shì ér shì 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 持续chí xù chí xù 的de de 非法活动fēi fǎ huó dòng fēi fǎ huó dòng [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 慈善机构cí shàn jī gòu cí shàn jī gòu 仍然réng rán réng rán 对duì duì 这类zhè lèi zhè lèi 保障bǎo zhàng bǎo zhàng 措施cuò shī cuò shī 在实践中zài shí jiàn zhōng zài shí jiàn zhōng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 真能zhēn néng zhēn néng 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 他们tā men tā men 持chí chí 怀疑huái yí huái yí 态度tài dù tài dù 。。 。
** * ** * 55 5 .. . 先例xiān lì xiān lì 有限yǒu xiàn yǒu xiàn 。。 。
** * ** * 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 的de de 唯一wéi yī wéi yī 近期jìn qī jìn qī 例子lì zi lì zi 是shì shì 20192019 2019 年nián nián AussieAussie Aussie FarmsFarms Farms IncInc Inc .. . 的de de 注销zhù xiāo zhù xiāo 登记dēng jì dēng jì ,, , 这是zhè shì zhè shì 一个yí gè yí gè 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 抗议kàng yì kàng yì 活动huó dòng huó dòng 的de de 动物dòng wù dòng wù 权利quán lì quán lì 团体tuán tǐ tuán tǐ [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
这zhè zhè 一个yí gè yí gè 案àn àn 很hěn hěn 难nán nán 证明zhèng míng zhèng míng 全面quán miàn quán miàn 的de de 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 是shì shì 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 的de de 。。 。

来源可信度评估

** * ** * 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán :: : ** * ** * 国际特赦guó jì tè shè guó jì tè shè 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 分会fēn huì fēn huì 和hé hé SBSSBS SBS 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 都dōu dōu 是shì shì 可信kě xìn kě xìn 的de de 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 来源lái yuán lái yuán [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
**Original sources:** Amnesty International Australia and SBS News are both credible, mainstream sources [1][2].
国际特赦guó jì tè shè guó jì tè shè 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 是shì shì 一个yí gè yí gè 在zài zài 全球quán qiú quán qiú 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi 内nèi nèi 运作yùn zuò yùn zuò 的de de 人权rén quán rén quán 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī ,, , 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 被bèi bèi 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 是shì shì 可靠kě kào kě kào 的de de ,, , 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 它tā tā 确实què shí què shí 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 特定tè dìng tè dìng 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 。。 。
Amnesty is a human rights organization that operates globally and is generally regarded as reliable, though it does advocate for specific policy positions.
SBSSBS SBS 是shì shì 公共广播gōng gòng guǎng bō gōng gòng guǎng bō 公司gōng sī gōng sī 和hé hé 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 新闻来源xīn wén lái yuán xīn wén lái yuán 。。 。
SBS is a public broadcaster and mainstream news source. **Supporting sources:** The Stronger Charities Alliance (a coalition of 100+ charities) and the Human Rights Law Centre are both reputable advocacy and legal organizations [4][5].
** * ** * 支持zhī chí zhī chí 来源lái yuán lái yuán :: : ** * ** * StrongerStronger Stronger CharitiesCharities Charities AllianceAlliance Alliance (( ( 100100 100 多个duō gè duō gè 慈善机构cí shàn jī gòu cí shàn jī gòu 的de de 联盟lián méng lián méng )) ) 和hé hé HumanHuman Human RightsRights Rights LawLaw Law CentreCentre Centre 都dōu dōu 是shì shì 知名zhī míng zhī míng 的de de 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 和hé hé 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
The Tax Technical article provides a detailed legal analysis based on parliamentary records [3].
TaxTax Tax TechnicalTechnical Technical 的de de 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 基于jī yú jī yú 议会yì huì yì huì 记录jì lù jì lù 提供tí gōng tí gōng 了le le 详细xiáng xì xiáng xì 的de de 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 分析fēn xī fēn xī [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做过zuò guò zuò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng ?? ?
**Did Labor do something similar?** The Labor government under Anthony Albanese (elected May 2022) did not pursue comparable restrictions on charity advocacy.
** * ** *
When the Labor government came to power, the 2021 regulations had already been defeated and were not in effect.
AnthonyAnthony Anthony AlbaneseAlbanese Albanese 领导lǐng dǎo lǐng dǎo 的de de LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ (( ( 20222022 2022 年nián nián 55 5 月yuè yuè 当选dāng xuǎn dāng xuǎn )) ) 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 采取cǎi qǔ cǎi qǔ 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 慈善机构cí shàn jī gòu cí shàn jī gòu 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 活动huó dòng huó dòng 的de de 措施cuò shī cuò shī 。。 。
Labor has not proposed similar measures to restrict charitable deductibility based on protest advocacy [7].
当dāng dāng LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 上台shàng tái shàng tái 时shí shí ,, , 20212021 2021 年nián nián 的de de 法规fǎ guī fǎ guī 已经yǐ jīng yǐ jīng 被bèi bèi 否决fǒu jué fǒu jué 且qiě qiě 未wèi wèi 生效shēng xiào shēng xiào 。。 。
However, it should be noted that government regulation of charity spending and advocacy—to prevent misuse of tax concessions—is not unique to the Coalition.
LaborLabor Labor 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 提出tí chū tí chū 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 措施cuò shī cuò shī 来lái lái 基于jī yú jī yú 抗议kàng yì kàng yì 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 活动huó dòng huó dòng 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 慈善cí shàn cí shàn 免税miǎn shuì miǎn shuì 资格zī gé zī gé [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。 。
Both major parties have supported maintaining some oversight of charities' compliance with governance standards.
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 应该yīng gāi yīng gāi 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū 的de de 是shì shì ,, , 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 对duì duì 慈善机构cí shàn jī gòu cí shàn jī gòu 支出zhī chū zhī chū 和hé hé 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 活动huó dòng huó dòng 的de de 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn —— — —— — 以yǐ yǐ 防止fáng zhǐ fáng zhǐ 税收shuì shōu shuì shōu 优惠yōu huì yōu huì 被bèi bèi 滥用làn yòng làn yòng —— — —— — 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu 。。 。
The difference is one of scope and implementation.
两大liǎng dà liǎng dà 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 都dōu dōu 支持zhī chí zhī chí 对duì duì 慈善机构cí shàn jī gòu cí shàn jī gòu 遵守zūn shǒu zūn shǒu 治理zhì lǐ zhì lǐ 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 某种mǒu zhǒng mǒu zhǒng 监督jiān dū jiān dū 。。 。
区别qū bié qū bié 在于zài yú zài yú 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi 和hé hé 实施shí shī shí shī 方式fāng shì fāng shì 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

** * ** * CoalitionCoalition Coalition 的de de 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng :: : ** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 辩称biàn chēng biàn chēng ,, , 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 法规fǎ guī fǎ guī 对于duì yú duì yú 防止fáng zhǐ fáng zhǐ 慈善机构cí shàn jī gòu cí shàn jī gòu 滥用làn yòng làn yòng 免税miǎn shuì miǎn shuì 捐赠juān zèng juān zèng 地位dì wèi dì wèi 、、 、 将jiāng jiāng 资源zī yuán zī yuán 用于yòng yú yòng yú 非法活动fēi fǎ huó dòng fēi fǎ huó dòng 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 慈善cí shàn cí shàn 目的mù dì mù dì 是shì shì 必要bì yào bì yào 的de de 。。 。
**The Coalition's position:** The government argued these regulations were necessary to prevent charities from abusing tax-deductible donation status by directing resources toward unlawful activity rather than charitable purposes.
其qí qí 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 是shì shì ,, , 捐赠者juān zèng zhě juān zèng zhě 资助zī zhù zī zhù 慈善机构cí shàn jī gòu cí shàn jī gòu 是shì shì 期望qī wàng qī wàng 他们tā men tā men 的de de 钱qián qián 用于yòng yú yòng yú 支持zhī chí zhī chí 慈善cí shàn cí shàn 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò ,, , 而ér ér 不是bú shì bú shì 非法活动fēi fǎ huó dòng fēi fǎ huó dòng [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The rationale was that donors fund charities expecting their money to support charitable work, not illegal activities [2]. **However, several factors undermined this justification:** 1. **Lack of evidence of widespread problem:** The ACNC Commissioner himself stated there were very few charities engaging in illegal activity, undermining the claim that new sweeping powers were necessary [6]. 2. **Scope was overly broad:** The regulations would have caught minor summary offences (like blocking a sidewalk) rather than targeting serious illegal conduct [3].
** * ** * 然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 有yǒu yǒu 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 因素yīn sù yīn sù 削弱xuē ruò xuē ruò 了le le 这zhè zhè 一yī yī 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu :: : ** * ** *
This made the measure appear punitive toward advocacy rather than genuinely addressing fraud or serious illegality. 3. **Chilling effect on legitimate advocacy:** Critics across the political spectrum (including Senator Fierravanti-Wells, a Coalition member) argued the regulations would deter charities from lawful advocacy activities that charities exist to perform [4].
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 缺乏quē fá quē fá 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 问题wèn tí wèn tí 的de de 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù :: : ** * ** * ACNCACNC ACNC 专员zhuān yuán zhuān yuán 本人běn rén běn rén 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì ,, , 很少hěn shǎo hěn shǎo 有yǒu yǒu 慈善机构cí shàn jī gòu cí shàn jī gòu 从事cóng shì cóng shì 非法活动fēi fǎ huó dòng fēi fǎ huó dòng ,, , 这zhè zhè 削弱xuē ruò xuē ruò 了le le 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 需要xū yào xū yào 新xīn xīn 的de de 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 权力quán lì quán lì 的de de 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
Unlike most western democracies, this seemed designed to silence rather than regulate. 4. **Subjective test was problematic:** Giving the Commissioner power to act based on "subjective belief" that a minor offence "may" occur created uncertainty that would burden charities with excessive compliance costs [1][3]. **Key context:** This is not unique to the Coalition—governments globally sometimes seek to regulate charitable activity.
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi 过于guò yú guò yú 宽泛kuān fàn kuān fàn :: : ** * ** * 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 法规fǎ guī fǎ guī 将jiāng jiāng 涵盖hán gài hán gài 轻微qīng wēi qīng wēi 的de de 简易程序jiǎn yì chéng xù jiǎn yì chéng xù 罪行zuì xíng zuì xíng (( ( 如rú rú 阻塞zǔ sè zǔ sè 人行道rén xíng dào rén xíng dào )) ) ,, , 而ér ér 不是bú shì bú shì 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 的de de 非法行为fēi fǎ xíng wéi fēi fǎ xíng wéi [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
However, Australian charities pointed out that no parallel restrictions exist in the business sector or for political parties (making the analogy to deregistering the Liberal Party for a member jaywalking apt) [1].
这zhè zhè 使得shǐ de shǐ de 该gāi gāi 措施cuò shī cuò shī 看起来kàn qǐ lái kàn qǐ lái 是shì shì 对duì duì 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 活动huó dòng huó dòng 的de de 惩罚chéng fá chéng fá ,, , 而ér ér 不是bú shì bú shì 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 解决jiě jué jiě jué 欺诈qī zhà qī zhà 或huò huò 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 非法行为fēi fǎ xíng wéi fēi fǎ xíng wéi 。。 。
The unanimous opposition from 100+ charities across the political spectrum, and the defeat by the Senate, suggests this measure fell outside mainstream Australian political consensus [4][5].
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 对duì duì 合法hé fǎ hé fǎ 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 活动huó dòng huó dòng 的de de 寒蝉hán chán hán chán 效应xiào yìng xiào yìng :: : ** * ** * 跨越kuà yuè kuà yuè 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 光谱guāng pǔ guāng pǔ 的de de 批评者pī píng zhě pī píng zhě (( ( 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò CoalitionCoalition Coalition 成员chéng yuán chéng yuán FierravantiFierravanti Fierravanti -- - WellsWells Wells 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán )) ) 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi ,, , 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 法规fǎ guī fǎ guī 将jiāng jiāng 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ 慈善机构cí shàn jī gòu cí shàn jī gòu 从事cóng shì cóng shì 慈善机构cí shàn jī gòu cí shàn jī gòu 理应lǐ yīng lǐ yīng 从事cóng shì cóng shì 的de de 合法hé fǎ hé fǎ 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 活动huó dòng huó dòng [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
与yǔ yǔ 大多数dà duō shù dà duō shù 西方xī fāng xī fāng 民主mín zhǔ mín zhǔ 国家guó jiā guó jiā 不同bù tóng bù tóng ,, , 这zhè zhè 似乎sì hū sì hū 是shì shì 旨在zhǐ zài zhǐ zài 压制yā zhì yā zhì 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 。。 。
44 4 .. . ** * ** * 主观zhǔ guān zhǔ guān 测试cè shì cè shì 存在cún zài cún zài 问题wèn tí wèn tí :: : ** * ** * 赋予fù yǔ fù yǔ 专员zhuān yuán zhuān yuán 基于jī yú jī yú "" " 主观zhǔ guān zhǔ guān 信念xìn niàn xìn niàn "" " 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 轻微qīng wēi qīng wēi 罪行zuì xíng zuì xíng "" " 可能kě néng kě néng "" " 发生fā shēng fā shēng 的de de 权力quán lì quán lì ,, , 造成zào chéng zào chéng 了le le 不确定性bù què dìng xìng bù què dìng xìng ,, , 将jiāng jiāng 使shǐ shǐ 慈善机构cí shàn jī gòu cí shàn jī gòu 承担chéng dān chéng dān 过高guò gāo guò gāo 的de de 合规hé guī hé guī 成本chéng běn chéng běn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng :: : ** * ** * 这zhè zhè 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu —— — —— — 全球quán qiú quán qiú 各国gè guó gè guó 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 有时yǒu shí yǒu shí 会huì huì 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 慈善cí shàn cí shàn 活动huó dòng huó dòng 。。 。
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 慈善机构cí shàn jī gòu cí shàn jī gòu 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū ,, , 商业部门shāng yè bù mén shāng yè bù mén 或huò huò 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì (( ( 这zhè zhè 使得shǐ de shǐ de 将jiāng jiāng 自由党zì yóu dǎng zì yóu dǎng 成员chéng yuán chéng yuán 乱穿luàn chuān luàn chuān 马路mǎ lù mǎ lù 就jiù jiù 注销zhù xiāo zhù xiāo 该党gāi dǎng gāi dǎng 登记dēng jì dēng jì 的de de 比喻bǐ yù bǐ yù 很hěn hěn 贴切tiē qiè tiē qiè )) ) [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
来自lái zì lái zì 跨越kuà yuè kuà yuè 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 光谱guāng pǔ guāng pǔ 的de de 100100 100 多个duō gè duō gè 慈善机构cí shàn jī gòu cí shàn jī gòu 的de de 一致yí zhì yí zhì 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì ,, , 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 的de de 否决fǒu jué fǒu jué ,, , 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 这一zhè yī zhè yī 措施cuò shī cuò shī 超出chāo chū chāo chū 了le le 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 共识gòng shí gòng shí [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。

属实

7.0

/ 10

所suǒ suǒ 描述miáo shù miáo shù 的de de 法规fǎ guī fǎ guī 确实què shí què shí 被bèi bèi 提交tí jiāo tí jiāo ,, , 并且bìng qiě bìng qiě 会huì huì 产生chǎn shēng chǎn shēng 所suǒ suǒ 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 的de de 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 。。 。
The regulations as described were tabled and would have had the effects claimed.
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 省略shěng lüè shěng lüè 了le le crucialcrucial crucial 事实shì shí shì shí ,, , 即jí jí 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 法规fǎ guī fǎ guī 被bèi bèi 否决fǒu jué fǒu jué 且qiě qiě 从未cóng wèi cóng wèi 生效shēng xiào shēng xiào 。。 。
However, the claim omits the crucial fact that the regulations were defeated and never came into effect.
读者dú zhě dú zhě 可能kě néng kě néng 会huì huì 相信xiāng xìn xiāng xìn 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 是shì shì 现行xiàn xíng xiàn xíng 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ ,, , 这是zhè shì zhè shì 错误cuò wù cuò wù 的de de 。。 。
A reader might believe these are current law, which is false.
该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 描述miáo shù miáo shù 了le le 拟议nǐ yì nǐ yì 法规fǎ guī fǎ guī 的de de 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi (( ( 关于guān yú guān yú 抗议kàng yì kàng yì 活动huó dòng huó dòng 的de de 推文tuī wén tuī wén 、、 、 在zài zài 可能kě néng kě néng 发生fā shēng fā shēng 轻微qīng wēi qīng wēi 罪行zuì xíng zuì xíng 的de de 抗议kàng yì kàng yì 活动huó dòng huó dòng 中zhōng zhōng 展示zhǎn shì zhǎn shì 标志biāo zhì biāo zhì )) ) ,, , 但dàn dàn 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 说明shuō míng shuō míng 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 在zài zài 持续chí xù chí xù 的de de 跨kuà kuà 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 和hé hé 慈善cí shàn cí shàn 部门bù mén bù mén 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 后hòu hòu 否决fǒu jué fǒu jué 了le le 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 法规fǎ guī fǎ guī 。。 。
The claim accurately describes the scope of the proposed regulations (tweeting about protests, displaying logos at protests where minor offences might occur) but without noting the Senate rejected them after sustained cross-party and charity sector opposition.

📚 来源与引用 (7)

  1. 1
    Charities Condemn New Federal Laws That Threaten To Shut Them Down

    Charities Condemn New Federal Laws That Threaten To Shut Them Down

    An alliance of Australia’s most well-established and respected charities, including Anglicare, UnitingCare Australia, Baptist Care Australia, St Vincent

    Amnesty International Australia
  2. 2
    Australian charities say tough new restrictions are an attempt to 'muzzle' their advocacy work

    Australian charities say tough new restrictions are an attempt to 'muzzle' their advocacy work

    Charities say tough new federal rules are an attempt to muzzle advocacy work and will detract from pandemic relief efforts.

    SBS News
  3. 3
    ACNC regulation disallowed in Senate - because it exposed charities to deregistration for lobbying

    ACNC regulation disallowed in Senate - because it exposed charities to deregistration for lobbying

    The Senate has disallowed the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission Amendment (2021 Measures No 2) Regulations 2021 after passing a disallowance motion moved by Senator Rex Patrick on 25 November 2021. This was because the new regulation exposed charities to deregistration, for advocacy – involving civil disobedience, even in pursuit of their charitable objects. The amending Regulations,…

    Tax Technical
  4. 4
    Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission (ACNC) Regulations 2021

    Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission (ACNC) Regulations 2021

    In 2021 the Government introduced new regulations that would have given the charities regulator sweeping powers to deregister charities for speaking out on behalf of the communities they serve. This was despite unanimous opposition from the charity sector and a confirmation from the charities commissioner – the head of the regulator – that the supposed ‘problem’ that... Read More

    Stronger Charities Alliance
  5. 5
    One down, one to go: Dangerous anti-charity regulations scrapped

    One down, one to go: Dangerous anti-charity regulations scrapped

    The Human Rights Law Centre has welcomed the news that the Senate has voted to disallow the Morrison Government’s proposed new anti-charity regulations.

    Human Rights Law Centre
  6. 6
    probonoaustralia.com.au

    Charities Still Wary of Updated Plan to Change Governance Standards

    Probonoaustralia Com

    Original link unavailable — view archived version
  7. 7
    acnc.gov.au

    Laws regarding charities that engage in unlawful activity to change

    Acnc Gov

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。