C0570
Klaim
“Mencoba mengesahkan beberapa RUU untuk memotong setengah pembayaran gaji tertunggak bagi pekerja dengan disabilitas intelektual yang hanya menerima upah sekitar A$1 per jam.”
Sumber Asli: Matthew Davis
Sumber Asli
✅ VERIFIKASI FAKTA
Fakta utama dari klaim ini **SEBAGIAN BENAR** namun memerlukan konteks yang substansial.
The core facts of this claim are **PARTIALLY TRUE** but require substantial context.
Pemerintah Koalisi (era Abbott/Turnbull) memang memperkenalkan undang-undang yang menawarkan pembayaran setara dengan sekitar 50% dari gaji tertunggak yang dihitung bagi pekerja dengan disabilitas intelektual yang telah dibayar dengan upah di bawah minimum sesuai Business Services Wage Assessment Tool (BSWAT) [1][2]. The Coalition government (Abbott/Turnbull era) did introduce legislation that offered payments equivalent to approximately 50% of calculated backpay to intellectually disabled workers who had been paid subminimum wages under the Business Services Wage Assessment Tool (BSWAT) [1][2].
BSWAT dinyatakan diskriminatif oleh Mahkamah Federal Penuh dalam *Nojin v Commonwealth* (2012), yang memutuskan bahwa penggunaan alat ini untuk menetapkan upah bagi pekerja dengan disabilitas intelektual melanggar Disability Discrimination Act 1992 [3][4]. The BSWAT was found discriminatory by the Full Federal Court in *Nojin v Commonwealth* (2012), which ruled that using this tool to set wages for intellectually disabled workers contravened the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 [3][4].
Namun, klaim ini mengandung beberapa elemen yang memerlukan penjelasan: 1. **Angka "A$1 per jam"**: Meskipun beberapa pekerja dibayar dengan upah yang sangat rendah, angka A$1/jam mewakili ujung ekstrem dari rentang tersebut. However, the claim contains several elements requiring clarification:
1. **The "$1 per hour" figure**: While some workers were paid very low wages, the $1/hour figure represents the extreme end of the range.
BSWAT menilai produktivitas dan kompetensi untuk menentukan tingkat upah, dengan beberapa pekerja menerima upah yang lebih tinggi (meski masih di bawah minimum) [5]. 2. **"Beberapa RUU"**: Pemerintah memperkenalkan Business Services Wage Assessment Tool Payment Scheme Bill 2014 dan Consequential Amendments Bill yang terkait - jadi secara teknis dua RUU, meski mereka merupakan paket legislatif [6][7]. 3. **Pembayaran 50%**: Legislasi yang diusulkan menawarkan pembayaran kepada pekerja yang memenuhi syarat hingga 50% dari jumlah yang terutang sebagai imbalan untuk melepaskan hak mereka untuk mengajukan klaim diskriminasi melalui pengadilan [8]. The BSWAT assessed productivity and competency to determine wage levels, with some workers receiving higher (though still subminimum) wages [5].
2. **"Multiple bills"**: The government introduced the Business Services Wage Assessment Tool Payment Scheme Bill 2014 and the associated Consequential Amendments Bill - so technically two bills, though they were a legislative package [6][7].
3. **The 50% payment**: The legislation proposed paying eligible workers up to 50% of what they were owed in exchange for waiving their rights to pursue discrimination claims through the courts [8].
Konteks yang Hilang
Klaim ini mengabaikan beberapa bagian konteks kritis: **1.
The claim omits several critical pieces of context:
**1.
Sistem upah diskriminatif sudah ada sebelum pemerintah Koalisi.** BSWAT dibuat pada tahun 2005 di bawah pemerintah Howard dan berlanjut selama pemerintahan Rudd/Gillard Labor (2007-2013) tanpa reformasi legislatif. The discriminatory system predated the Coalition government.** The BSWAT was established in 2005 under the Howard government and continued through the Rudd/Gillard Labor governments (2007-2013) without legislative reform.
Mahkamah Federal Penuh baru menyatakannya diskriminatif pada tahun 2012 [9][10]. **2. The Full Federal Court did not rule it discriminatory until 2012 [9][10].
**2.
Alasan hukum untuk upah di bawah minimum.** Di bawah Fair Work Act dan pendahulunya, Australian Disability Enterprises (ADEs) secara hukum diizinkan membayar upah di bawah minimum kepada pekerja dengan disabilitas menggunakan alat penilaian upah yang telah disetujui. Legal justification for subminimum wages.** Under the Fair Work Act and its predecessors, Australian Disability Enterprises (ADEs) were legally permitted to pay subminimum wages to workers with disabilities using approved wage assessment tools.
BSWAT adalah salah satu dari sekitar 30 alat semacam itu yang disetujui oleh Fair Work Commission [11]. The BSWAT was one of approximately 30 such tools approved by the Fair Work Commission [11].
Praktik ini bukan unik bagi Koalisi tetapi tertanam dalam hukum ketenagakerjaan Australia di berbagai pemerintahan. **3. This practice was not unique to the Coalition but was embedded in Australian employment law across multiple governments.
**3.
Dilema kebijakan yang kompleks.** Pemerintah menghadapi situasi sulit: sekitar 10.000 pekerja terdampak, dan ADEs (dulunya "bengkel yang dilindungi") adalah organisasi nirlaba yang mempekerjakan orang dengan disabilitas signifikan yang mungkin tidak akan memperoleh pekerjaan sama sekali. The complex policy dilemma.** The government faced a difficult situation: approximately 10,000 workers were affected, and ADEs (formerly "sheltered workshops") were not-for-profit organizations employing people with significant disabilities who might otherwise not have employment at all.
Pembayaran penuh dapat membuat banyak ADEs bangkrut, berpotensi membuat ribuan pekerja rentan kehilangan pekerjaan sepenuhnya [12][13]. **4. Full backpay could have bankrupted many ADEs, potentially putting thousands of vulnerable workers out of employment entirely [12][13].
**4.
Konteks tindakan kelompok.** Pada saat legislasi diperkenalkan, pengacara Maurice Blackburn sedang melakukan tindakan kelompok atas nama pekerja yang menuntut kompensasi penuh. The class action context.** At the time the legislation was introduced, Maurice Blackburn lawyers were conducting a class action on behalf of the workers seeking full compensation.
Ketentuan pelepasan dalam RUU dirancang untuk mencegah partisipasi dalam tindakan kelompok ini [14]. **5. The bill's waiver provisions were designed to prevent participation in this class action [14].
**5.
Amandemen Senat meningkatkan legislasi.** Setelah penolakan awal dari Labor dan Greens, Senat akhirnya menyetujui versi yang telah diubah dari RUU. Senate amendments improved the legislation.** After initial opposition from Labor and the Greens, the Senate eventually passed amended versions of the bills.
Legislasi akhir dimodifikasi untuk mengatasi beberapa kekhawatiran pekerja [15]. The final legislation was modified to address some worker concerns [15].
Penilaian Kredibilitas Sumber
Sumber asli - artikel Sydney Morning Herald oleh Latika Bourke dari Juni 2015 - kredibel dan akurat secara faktual dalam pelaporannya.
The original source - the Sydney Morning Herald article by Latika Bourke from June 2015 - is credible and factually accurate in its reporting.
SMH adalah media arus utama yang bereputasi di Australia. SMH is a mainstream, reputable Australian news outlet.
Namun, judul artikel ("We'll give you half") dan bingkai yang digunakan berfokus pada aspek negatif tanpa sepenuhnya menjelaskan rasional kebijakan atau konteks historis. However, the article's headline ("We'll give you half") and framing focus on the negative aspects without fully explaining the policy rationale or historical context.
Artikel tersebut secara benar melaporkan kesepakatan Senat dan kekhawatiran pekerja namun tidak secara ekstensif membahas pembenaran pemerintah untuk angka 50% [1]. The article correctly reports on the Senate deal and worker concerns but does not extensively cover the government's justification for the 50% figure [1].
⚖️
Perbandingan Labor
**Apakah Labor melakukan hal yang serupa?** Pencarian: "Labor government disability employment policy Australian Disability Enterprises backpay" Hasil: Pemerintahan Rudd/Gillard Labor (2007-2013) mempertahankan sistem BSWAT yang sama tanpa mereformasinya.
**Did Labor do something similar?**
Search conducted: "Labor government disability employment policy Australian Disability Enterprises backpay"
Finding: The Rudd/Gillard Labor government (2007-2013) maintained the same BSWAT system without reforming it.
Alat penilaian upah diskriminatif terus beroperasi sepanjang masa jabatan Labor. The discriminatory wage tool continued operating throughout Labor's term in office.
Labor baru mengatasi masalah ini setelah putusan Mahkamah Federal tahun 2012 yang menyatakan sifat diskriminatif secara hukum tidak dapat disangkal [9][16]. Labor only addressed the issue after the Federal Court's 2012 ruling made the discriminatory nature legally undeniable [9][16].
Labor mengkritik proposal pembayaran 50% Koalisi saat berada di oposisi, namun tidak mengusulkan mekanisme pendanaan alternatif untuk pembayaran penuh saat berada di pemerintahan. Labor criticized the Coalition's 50% payment proposal while in opposition, but did not propose an alternative funding mechanism for full backpay when they were in government.
Masalah ini baru menjadi mendesak karena putusan pengadilan selama masa jabatan mereka, bukan karena reformasi kebijakan proaktif Labor [17]. **Perbandingan**: Kedua pemerintahan mempertahankan sistem upah minimum untuk pekerja dengan disabilitas. The issue only became urgent because of the court ruling during their term, not because of proactive Labor policy reform [17].
**Comparison**: Both governments maintained subminimum wage systems for workers with disabilities.
Koalisi mewarisi masalah tersebut dan mencoba solusi legislatif (meski cacat) yang mengakui putusan pengadilan. The Coalition inherited the problem and attempted a legislative solution (albeit flawed) that acknowledged the court ruling.
Tidak satu pun dari pemerintahan tersebut secara proaktif menghapus praktik upah diskriminatif sebelum dipaksa oleh tindakan pengadilan. Neither government proactively eliminated discriminatory wage practices before being forced to by court action.
🌐
Perspektif Seimbang
**Pembenaran pemerintah:** Koalisi berargumen bahwa tanpa skema pembayaran, ribuan pekerja mungkin tidak menerima apa pun karena ADEs tidak mampu membayar gaji tertunggak penuh dan mungkin tutup.
**The government's justification:**
The Coalition argued that without the payment scheme, thousands of workers might receive nothing at all because ADEs could not afford full backpay and might close.
Pemerintah menyatakan skema tersebut akan memberikan kompensasi yang pasti dan segera daripada hasil yang tidak pasti dari litigasi yang berkepanjangan [18]. The government stated the scheme would provide certain, immediate compensation rather than uncertain outcomes from prolonged litigation [18].
Para advokat disabilitas terbagi - beberapa mendukung skema untuk memastikan kelangsungan pekerjaan, sementara yang lain menuntut kompensasi penuh [12][13]. **Kritik:** Advokat pekerja, Greens, dan Labor berargumen bahwa angka 50% sewenang-wenang dan tidak adil bagi pekerja yang telah dibayar rendah selama bertahun-tahun. Disability advocates were divided - some supported the scheme to secure employment continuity, while others demanded full compensation [12][13].
**The criticism:**
Workers' advocates, the Greens, and Labor argued that the 50% figure was arbitrary and unfair to workers who had been underpaid for years.
Persyaratan untuk melepaskan hak hukum untuk mengejar klaim diskriminasi sangat kontroversial, secara efektif menggunakan legislasi untuk melindungi Commonwealth dari tanggung jawab [17][19]. **Hasil akhir:** Pada Desember 2016, Mahkamah Federal menyetujui penyelesaian dalam tindakan kelompok Maurice Blackburn yang memberikan kompensasi sekitar A$100 juta kepada pekerja yang terdampak - jauh lebih besar daripada yang akan diberikan oleh skema yang diusulkan pemerintah [20][21]. The requirement to waive legal rights to pursue discrimination claims was particularly controversial, effectively using legislation to protect the Commonwealth from liability [17][19].
**The eventual outcome:**
In December 2016, the Federal Court approved a settlement in the Maurice Blackburn class action that provided approximately $100 million in compensation to affected workers - significantly more than the government's proposed scheme would have provided [20][21].
Ini menunjukkan bahwa rute tindakan kelompok pada akhirnya memberikan hasil yang lebih baik daripada tawaran 50% pemerintah. **Konteks kunci:** Masalah ini bukan unik bagi Koalisi. This suggests the class action route ultimately delivered better outcomes than the government's 50% offer.
**Key context:** This issue was not unique to the Coalition.
Kedua partai utama mempertahankan sistem upah diskriminatif bagi pekerja dengan disabilitas selama beberapa dekade. Both major parties maintained discriminatory wage systems for workers with disabilities for decades.
Koalisi mencoba menyelesaikan masalah melalui legislasi, meski dengan pendekatan kontroversial yang mengutamakan keberlanjutan ADE daripada kompensasi pekerja penuh. The Coalition attempted to resolve the issue through legislation, albeit with a controversial approach that prioritized ADE viability over full worker compensation.
Penyelesaian akhir melalui pengadilan memberikan kompensasi yang lebih lengkap, menunjukkan pendekatan pemerintah tidak memadai. The ultimate resolution through the courts provided fuller compensation, suggesting the government's approach was insufficient.
SEBAGIAN BENAR
5.0
/ 10
Klaim ini secara faktual akurat bahwa Koalisi memang mengusulkan legislasi yang menawarkan pembayaran gaji tertunggak sebesar 50% kepada pekerja dengan disabilitas intelektual.
The claim is factually accurate in that the Coalition did propose legislation offering 50% backpay to intellectually disabled workers.
Namun, klaim ini mengabaikan bahwa: (1) sistem upah diskriminatif beroperasi di bawah kedua pemerintahan Labor dan Koalisi selama bertahun-tahun; (2) pemerintah menghadapi dilema yang nyata antara kompensasi penuh dan mempertahankan pekerjaan bagi pekerja rentan; (3) hasil akhir melalui pengadilan memberikan kompensasi yang lebih baik daripada proposal pemerintah; dan (4) Labor juga mempertahankan sistem diskriminatif ketika berada di pemerintahan. However, it omits that: (1) the discriminatory wage system operated under both Labor and Coalition governments for years; (2) the government faced a genuine dilemma between full compensation and preserving employment for vulnerable workers; (3) the final outcome through the courts delivered better compensation than the government's proposal; and (4) Labor also maintained the discriminatory system when in government.
Bingkai yang digunakan menyiratkan kesalahan unik Koalisi padahal ini adalah masalah sistemik yang melintasi partai dan telah ada di berbagai pemerintahan. The framing suggests unique Coalition malfeasance when this was a systemic, bipartisan issue that spanned multiple governments.
Skor Akhir
5.0
/ 10
SEBAGIAN BENAR
Klaim ini secara faktual akurat bahwa Koalisi memang mengusulkan legislasi yang menawarkan pembayaran gaji tertunggak sebesar 50% kepada pekerja dengan disabilitas intelektual.
The claim is factually accurate in that the Coalition did propose legislation offering 50% backpay to intellectually disabled workers.
Namun, klaim ini mengabaikan bahwa: (1) sistem upah diskriminatif beroperasi di bawah kedua pemerintahan Labor dan Koalisi selama bertahun-tahun; (2) pemerintah menghadapi dilema yang nyata antara kompensasi penuh dan mempertahankan pekerjaan bagi pekerja rentan; (3) hasil akhir melalui pengadilan memberikan kompensasi yang lebih baik daripada proposal pemerintah; dan (4) Labor juga mempertahankan sistem diskriminatif ketika berada di pemerintahan. However, it omits that: (1) the discriminatory wage system operated under both Labor and Coalition governments for years; (2) the government faced a genuine dilemma between full compensation and preserving employment for vulnerable workers; (3) the final outcome through the courts delivered better compensation than the government's proposal; and (4) Labor also maintained the discriminatory system when in government.
Bingkai yang digunakan menyiratkan kesalahan unik Koalisi padahal ini adalah masalah sistemik yang melintasi partai dan telah ada di berbagai pemerintahan. The framing suggests unique Coalition malfeasance when this was a systemic, bipartisan issue that spanned multiple governments.
📚 SUMBER DAN KUTIPAN (21)
-
1
We'll give you half: Senate's deal for underpaid intellectually disabled workers
Intellectually disabled workers who were paid as little as $1 an hour will have to waive their right to make discrimination claims if they accept a government payment equivalent to 50 per cent of what they are owed.
The Sydney Morning Herald -
2
Business Services Wage Assessment Tool (BSWAT) payment scheme
Ato Gov
-
3PDF
Court in Nojin v Commonwealth of Australia
Law Unimelb Edu • PDF Document -
4PDF
Chapter 2 - Business Services Wage Assessment Tool Payment Scheme
Aph Gov • PDF Document -
5PDF
An update on the Business Services Wage Assessment Tool (BSWAT)
Humanrights Gov • PDF Document -
6
Business Services Wage Assessment Tool Payment Scheme Act 2015
Legislation Gov
-
7PDF
Business Services Wage Assessment Tool Payment Scheme Bill 2014
Aph Gov • PDF Document -
8
Business Services Wage Assessment Tool Payment Scheme Bill 2014 Explanatory Memorandum
Ato Gov
-
9PDF
Addressing Ableism in Workplace Policies and Practices: the Case for...
Classic Austlii Edu • PDF Document -
10
Outrageous decision on disability wages
4 May 2015 A decision by the Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) to grant the Australian Government a further four month exemption to allow Australian Disability Enterprises (ADEs) to continue to pay workers under the discriminatory Business Services Wage Assessment Tool (BSWAT) has shocked a coalition of national disability representative and advocacy organisations. As a
People with Disability Australia - -
11PDF
Law and Disability 'Supported' Employment in Australia
Opus Lib Uts Edu • PDF Document -
12
ABC Story on ADE backpay
ELIZABETH JACKSON: A prominent law firm has slammed the Federal Government's moves to legislate a new wages payment scheme for intellectually disabled workers. The peak body representing the disability enterprises, formerly known as sheltered...
ADE -
13
Australian Disability Enterprises can pay workers a fraction of the minimum wage
A year on from the disability royal commission's final report, ABC NEWS takes a closer look at one of the biggest and most contentious proposals for change — phasing out segregated employment.
Abc Net -
14
BSWAT Senate hearing and court case: recent progress and commentary
Progress on the Business Services Wage Assessment Tool (BSWAT) debate is gaining more media attention as Senate hearings approach: Back pay...
Keepingupwithds Blogspot -
15PDF
The Senate BILLS: Business Services Wage Assessment Tool Payment Scheme
Tasmaniantimes • PDF Document -
16
Disability employment reforms
Dss Gov
-
17
Labor misleads on disability wage tool payment scheme
Formerministers Dss Gov -
18
Your rights as an employee under the Disability Discrimination Act 1992
Learn about the Disability Discrimination Act, what you can do if you experience discrimination and how to make a complaint to the Commission.
Humanrights Gov -
19
Business Services Wage Assessment Tool Payment Scheme Bill 2014 - Senate Committee Report
Chapter 2 Key issues 2.1 Participants in the inquiry expressed concern with elements of the BSWAT Payment Scheme and specific provisions of the Bill, including: calculation of the 'payment amount'; legal consequences o
Aph Gov -
20
Workers with intellectual disabilities class action
Maurice Blackburn Lawyers, working in conjunction with the AED Legal Centre, has settled a class action against the Commonwealth of Australia in the Federal Court which alleged unlawful discrimination against workers with intellectual disabilities who work in Australian Disability Enterprises (ADE).
Mauriceblackburn Com -
21
Underpaid disabled workers to claim compensation after Federal Court win
Ten thousand disabled workers who were underpaid at government-funded workshops across the country are able to claim compensation from the Commonwealth, following a Federal Court ruling.
Abc Net
Metodologi Skala Penilaian
1-3: SALAH
Secara faktual salah atau fabrikasi jahat.
4-6: SEBAGIAN
Ada kebenaran tetapi konteks hilang atau menyimpang.
7-9: SEBAGIAN BESAR BENAR
Masalah teknis kecil atau masalah redaksi.
10: AKURAT
Terverifikasi sempurna dan adil secara kontekstual.
Metodologi: Penilaian ditentukan melalui referensi silang catatan pemerintah resmi, organisasi pemeriksa fakta independen, dan dokumen sumber primer.