C0825 - 环境 | PoliticalClaims.au

C0825

声明内容

“试图豁免塔斯马尼亚世界遗产森林中的伐木工人遵守《环境保护与生物多样性保护法》，这样他们就不必担心杀害濒危物种。”

环境

原始来源： Matthew Davis

分析时间： 1 Feb 2026

原始来源

mdavis.xyz

Documentation of Coalition government policies and claims.

Matthew Davis

✅ 事实核查

该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 涉及shè jí shè jí AbbottAbbott Abbott 领导lǐng dǎo lǐng dǎo 的de de CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 20142014 2014 -- - 20152015 2015 年nián nián 期间qī jiān qī jiān 关于guān yú guān yú 塔斯马尼亚tǎ sī mǎ ní yà tǎ sī mǎ ní yà 世界遗产shì jiè yí chǎn shì jiè yí chǎn 森林sēn lín sēn lín 和hé hé 《《《环境保护huán jìng bǎo hù huán jìng bǎo hù 与yǔ yǔ 生物shēng wù shēng wù 多样性duō yàng xìng duō yàng xìng 保护法bǎo hù fǎ bǎo hù fǎ 》》》（（（ EPBCEPBC EPBC 法fǎ fǎ ）））的de de 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 。。。

The claim addresses the Abbott Coalition government's actions regarding Tasmanian World Heritage forests and the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act during 2014-2015. **Core Claim Assessment:** The claim is **partially accurate but requires significant clarification** regarding the nature of the exemption and the specific mechanisms involved. **Historical Context:** In 2014, the Abbott government pursued an aggressive agenda regarding Tasmanian forestry that included multiple controversial actions: 1. **World Heritage Delisting Attempt (2014):** The Coalition government formally applied to UNESCO to remove 74,000 hectares of Tasmanian forest from the World Heritage List, claiming these areas were degraded and should be available for logging [1].

** * ** * 核心hé xīn hé xīn 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 评估píng gū píng gū ：：： ** * ** *

This was the first time any developed country had requested a reduction in World Heritage boundaries for commercial purposes [2]. 2. **Environmental Regulation Changes:** The government pursued changes to environmental oversight mechanisms, including attempts to streamline approval processes that would reduce EPBC Act scrutiny for certain activities [3]. 3. **Threatened Species Context:** Tasmania's forests are home to critically endangered species including the Tasmanian devil, spotted-tailed quoll, and various threatened forest habitats [4]. **The "Exemption" Claim:** The claim's assertion about "exempting loggers" from the EPBC Act appears to reference the broader pattern of deregulation and the World Heritage delisting attempt rather than a specific legislative exemption passed into law.

该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 部分bù fèn bù fèn 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què ，，，但dàn dàn 需要xū yào xū yào 对duì duì 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn 的de de 性质xìng zhì xìng zhì 和hé hé 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 机制jī zhì jī zhì 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 澄清chéng qīng chéng qīng 。。。

The related claims in this dataset provide important context: - C0965 documents the Abbott government's attempt to "unwind World Heritage protection" for Tasmanian forests [5] - C0843 alleges the Coalition "lied to the United Nations about the quality of the Tasmanian forests they want removed from the world heritage list" [6] - C0678 notes these actions were part of an "aggressive agenda on resource development, including attempts to delist World Heritage areas in Tasmania" [7] **What Actually Occurred:** The UNESCO delisting attempt failed - the World Heritage Committee rejected Australia's application in 2015, with only one country (Australia itself) supporting the delisting [8].

** * ** * 历史背景lì shǐ bèi jǐng lì shǐ bèi jǐng ：：： ** * ** *

No specific EPBC Act exemption for Tasmanian loggers was enacted into law.

20142014 2014 年nián nián ，，， AbbottAbbott Abbott 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 塔斯马尼亚tǎ sī mǎ ní yà tǎ sī mǎ ní yà 林业lín yè lín yè 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 推行tuī xíng tuī xíng 了le le 积极jī jí jī jí 的de de 议程yì chéng yì chéng ，，，包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 多项duō xiàng duō xiàng 有yǒu yǒu 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì 的de de 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng ：：：

However, the government did attempt to reduce environmental oversight through: - The World Heritage delisting application (which would have removed international protection) - Broader deregulation agendas under the "one-stop shop" environmental approval reforms - Changes to Regional Forest Agreements that limited EPBC Act application [9]

11 1 .. . ** * ** * 世界遗产shì jiè yí chǎn shì jiè yí chǎn 除名chú míng chú míng 尝试cháng shì cháng shì （（（ 20142014 2014 年nián nián ）））：：： ** * ** * CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 正式zhèng shì zhèng shì 向xiàng xiàng 联合国教科文组织lián hé guó jiào kē wén zǔ zhī lián hé guó jiào kē wén zǔ zhī 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng 将jiāng jiāng 7474 74 ,, , 000000 000 公顷gōng qǐng gōng qǐng 的de de 塔斯马尼亚tǎ sī mǎ ní yà tǎ sī mǎ ní yà 森林sēn lín sēn lín 从cóng cóng 世界遗产shì jiè yí chǎn shì jiè yí chǎn 名录míng lù míng lù 中zhōng zhōng 除名chú míng chú míng ，，，声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 区域qū yù qū yù 已yǐ yǐ 退化tuì huà tuì huà ，，，应可yīng kě yīng kě 用于yòng yú yòng yú 伐木fá mù fá mù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。。

这是zhè shì zhè shì 发达国家fā dá guó jiā fā dá guó jiā 首次shǒu cì shǒu cì 出于chū yú chū yú 商业shāng yè shāng yè 目的mù dì mù dì 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 世界遗产shì jiè yí chǎn shì jiè yí chǎn 边界biān jiè biān jiè [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。。

22 2 .. . ** * ** * 环境huán jìng huán jìng 法规fǎ guī fǎ guī 变更biàn gēng biàn gēng ：：： ** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 推动tuī dòng tuī dòng 改变gǎi biàn gǎi biàn 环境huán jìng huán jìng 监督机制jiān dū jī zhì jiān dū jī zhì ，，，包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 试图shì tú shì tú 简化jiǎn huà jiǎn huà 审批shěn pī shěn pī 程序chéng xù chéng xù ，，，以yǐ yǐ 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 对duì duì 某些mǒu xiē mǒu xiē 活动huó dòng huó dòng 的de de EPBCEPBC EPBC 法fǎ fǎ 审查shěn chá shěn chá [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。。

33 3 .. . ** * ** * 濒危bīn wēi bīn wēi 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ：：： ** * ** * 塔斯马尼亚tǎ sī mǎ ní yà tǎ sī mǎ ní yà 的de de 森林sēn lín sēn lín 是shì shì 极度jí dù jí dù 濒危bīn wēi bīn wēi 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 的de de 栖息地qī xī dì qī xī dì ，，，包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 塔斯马尼亚tǎ sī mǎ ní yà tǎ sī mǎ ní yà 恶魔è mó è mó 、、、斑尾袋bān wěi dài bān wěi dài 鼬yòu yòu 和hé hé 各种gè zhǒng gè zhǒng 受shòu shòu 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 的de de 森林sēn lín sēn lín 栖息地qī xī dì qī xī dì [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。。

** * ** * "" " 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn "" " 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng ：：： ** * ** *

该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 关于guān yú guān yú "" " 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn 伐木工人fá mù gōng rén fá mù gōng rén "" " 遵守zūn shǒu zūn shǒu EPBCEPBC EPBC 法fǎ fǎ 的de de 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ ，，，似乎sì hū sì hū 指zhǐ zhǐ 的de de 是shì shì 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 放松fàng sōng fàng sōng 管制guǎn zhì guǎn zhì 模式mó shì mó shì 和hé hé 世界遗产shì jiè yí chǎn shì jiè yí chǎn 除名chú míng chú míng 尝试cháng shì cháng shì ，，，而ér ér 非fēi fēi 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 已yǐ yǐ 颁布bān bù bān bù 为wèi wèi 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 的de de 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn 。。。

该gāi gāi 数据shù jù shù jù 集中jí zhōng jí zhōng 的de de 相关xiāng guān xiāng guān 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 提供tí gōng tí gōng 了le le 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ：：：

-- - C0965C0965 C0965 记录jì lù jì lù 了le le AbbottAbbott Abbott 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 试图shì tú shì tú "" " 解除jiě chú jiě chú 塔斯马尼亚tǎ sī mǎ ní yà tǎ sī mǎ ní yà 森林sēn lín sēn lín 的de de 世界遗产shì jiè yí chǎn shì jiè yí chǎn 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù "" " [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]

-- - C0843C0843 C0843 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng CoalitionCoalition Coalition "" " 就jiù jiù 他们tā men tā men 想xiǎng xiǎng 从cóng cóng 世界遗产shì jiè yí chǎn shì jiè yí chǎn 名录míng lù míng lù 中zhōng zhōng 移除yí chú yí chú 的de de 塔斯马尼亚tǎ sī mǎ ní yà tǎ sī mǎ ní yà 森林sēn lín sēn lín 质量zhì liàng zhì liàng 向xiàng xiàng 联合国lián hé guó lián hé guó 撒谎sā huǎng sā huǎng "" " [[ [ 66 6 ]] ]

-- - C0678C0678 C0678 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 是shì shì "" " 积极jī jí jī jí 的de de 资源zī yuán zī yuán 开发kāi fā kāi fā 议程yì chéng yì chéng 的de de 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn ，，，包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 试图shì tú shì tú 将jiāng jiāng 塔斯马尼亚tǎ sī mǎ ní yà tǎ sī mǎ ní yà 的de de 世界遗产shì jiè yí chǎn shì jiè yí chǎn 区域qū yù qū yù 除名chú míng chú míng "" " [[ [ 77 7 ]] ]

** * ** * 实际shí jì shí jì 发生fā shēng fā shēng 的de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng ：：： ** * ** *

教科文组织jiào kē wén zǔ zhī jiào kē wén zǔ zhī 的de de 除名chú míng chú míng 尝试cháng shì cháng shì 失败shī bài shī bài 了le le —— — —— — 世界遗产shì jiè yí chǎn shì jiè yí chǎn 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 于yú yú 20152015 2015 年nián nián 拒绝jù jué jù jué 了le le 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 的de de 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng ，，，只有zhǐ yǒu zhǐ yǒu 一个yí gè yí gè 国家guó jiā guó jiā （（（澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 本身běn shēn běn shēn ）））支持zhī chí zhī chí 除名chú míng chú míng [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。。

没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 塔斯马尼亚tǎ sī mǎ ní yà tǎ sī mǎ ní yà 伐木工人fá mù gōng rén fá mù gōng rén 的de de 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ EPBCEPBC EPBC 法fǎ fǎ 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn 被bèi bèi 颁布bān bù bān bù 为wèi wèi 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 。。。

然而rán ér rán ér ，，，政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 试图shì tú shì tú 通过tōng guò tōng guò 以下yǐ xià yǐ xià 方式fāng shì fāng shì 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 环境huán jìng huán jìng 监督jiān dū jiān dū ：：：

-- - 世界遗产shì jiè yí chǎn shì jiè yí chǎn 除名chú míng chú míng 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng （（（这zhè zhè 将jiāng jiāng 移除yí chú yí chú 国际guó jì guó jì 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù ）））

-- - "" " 一站式yī zhàn shì yī zhàn shì "" " 环境huán jìng huán jìng 审批shěn pī shěn pī 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 下xià xià 的de de 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 放松fàng sōng fàng sōng 管制guǎn zhì guǎn zhì 议程yì chéng yì chéng

-- - 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì EPBCEPBC EPBC 法fǎ fǎ 适用shì yòng shì yòng 的de de 区域qū yù qū yù 森林sēn lín sēn lín 协议xié yì xié yì 变更biàn gēng biàn gēng [[ [ 99 9 ]] ]

缺失背景

该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 要素yào sù yào sù ：：：

The claim omits several critical contextual elements: **1.

** * ** * 11 1 .. . 除名chú míng chú míng 失败shī bài shī bài 了le le ：：： ** * ** * 最zuì zuì 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 的de de 缺失quē shī quē shī 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 是shì shì 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 的de de 尝试cháng shì cháng shì 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 成功chéng gōng chéng gōng 。。。

The Delisting Failed:** The most important missing context is that the government's attempt to reduce protections was ultimately unsuccessful.

教科文组织jiào kē wén zǔ zhī jiào kē wén zǔ zhī 于yú yú 20152015 2015 年nián nián 拒绝jù jué jù jué 了le le 除名chú míng chú míng 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng ，，，世界遗产shì jiè yí chǎn shì jiè yí chǎn 边界biān jiè biān jiè 保持bǎo chí bǎo chí 完整wán zhěng wán zhěng [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。。

UNESCO rejected the delisting application in 2015, and the World Heritage boundaries remained intact [8]. **2.

** * ** * 22 2 .. . 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 通过tōng guò tōng guò 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 的de de EPBCEPBC EPBC 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ ：：： ** * ** * 虽然suī rán suī rán 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 推行tuī xíng tuī xíng 了le le 各种gè zhǒng gè zhǒng 放松fàng sōng fàng sōng 管制guǎn zhì guǎn zhì 措施cuò shī cuò shī ，，，但dàn dàn 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 颁布bān bù bān bù 创建chuàng jiàn chuàng jiàn 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 伐木工人fá mù gōng rén fá mù gōng rén "" " 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn "" " 遵守zūn shǒu zūn shǒu EPBCEPBC EPBC 法fǎ fǎ 的de de 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 。。。

No Specific EPBC Exemption Legislation Passed:** While the government pursued various deregulation measures, no specific legislation was enacted that created a blanket "exemption" for loggers from the EPBC Act.

该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 夸大kuā dà kuā dà 了le le 实际shí jì shí jì 实现shí xiàn shí xiàn 的de de 内容nèi róng nèi róng 与yǔ yǔ 试图shì tú shì tú 实现shí xiàn shí xiàn 的de de 内容nèi róng nèi róng [[ [ 1010 10 ]] ] 。。。

The claim overstates what was actually achieved versus what was attempted [10]. **3.

** * ** * 33 3 .. . 区域qū yù qū yù 森林sēn lín sēn lín 协议xié yì xié yì 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ：：： ** * ** * 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 提到tí dào tí dào 塔斯马尼亚tǎ sī mǎ ní yà tǎ sī mǎ ní yà 根据gēn jù gēn jù 区域qū yù qū yù 森林sēn lín sēn lín 协议xié yì xié yì （（（ RFARFA RFA ）））运作yùn zuò yùn zuò ，，，该gāi gāi 协议xié yì xié yì 已yǐ yǐ 为wèi wèi 遵守zūn shǒu zūn shǒu RFARFA RFA 的de de 林业lín yè lín yè 作业zuò yè zuò yè 提供tí gōng tí gōng 了le le 某些mǒu xiē mǒu xiē EPBCEPBC EPBC 法fǎ fǎ 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn 。。。

Regional Forest Agreement Context:** The claim doesn't mention that Tasmania operates under a Regional Forest Agreement (RFA) that already provides certain exemptions from the EPBC Act for forestry operations that comply with the RFA.

这是zhè shì zhè shì 预先yù xiān yù xiān 存在cún zài cún zài 的de de 安排ān pái ān pái ，，，而ér ér 非fēi fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 特定tè dìng tè dìng 的de de 变更biàn gēng biàn gēng [[ [ 1111 11 ]] ] 。。。

This is a pre-existing arrangement, not a Coalition-specific change [11]. **4.

** * ** * 44 4 .. . 林业lín yè lín yè 经济jīng jì jīng jì 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ：：： ** * ** * 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le 塔斯马尼亚tǎ sī mǎ ní yà tǎ sī mǎ ní yà 林业lín yè lín yè 正在zhèng zài zhèng zài 显著xiǎn zhù xiǎn zhù 衰退shuāi tuì shuāi tuì ，，，工作岗位gōng zuò gǎng wèi gōng zuò gǎng wèi 正在zhèng zài zhèng zài 流失liú shī liú shī ，，，工厂gōng chǎng gōng chǎng 正在zhèng zài zhèng zài 关闭guān bì guān bì 。。。

Forestry Industry Economic Context:** The claim omits that the Tasmanian forestry industry was in significant decline, with jobs being lost and mills closing.

政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 被bèi bèi 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为wèi wèi 试图shì tú shì tú 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 剩余shèng yú shèng yú 的de de 林业lín yè lín yè 工作岗位gōng zuò gǎng wèi gōng zuò gǎng wèi ，，，尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 批评者pī píng zhě pī píng zhě 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 这zhè zhè 是shì shì 在zài zài 牺牲xī shēng xī shēng 环境huán jìng huán jìng 价值jià zhí jià zhí [[ [ 1212 12 ]] ] 。。。

The government's actions were framed as attempting to protect remaining forestry jobs, though critics argued this was at the expense of environmental values [12]. **5.

** * ** * 55 5 .. . LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng ：：： ** * ** * GillardGillard Gillard 领导lǐng dǎo lǐng dǎo 的de de LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 此前cǐ qián cǐ qián 于yú yú 20122012 2012 年nián nián 延长yán cháng yán cháng 了le le 塔斯马尼亚tǎ sī mǎ ní yà tǎ sī mǎ ní yà 区域qū yù qū yù 森林sēn lín sēn lín 协议xié yì xié yì ，，，维持wéi chí wéi chí 了le le 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì EPBCEPBC EPBC 法fǎ fǎ 适用shì yòng shì yòng 的de de RFARFA RFA 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 。。。

Labor Government Actions:** The Gillard Labor government had previously extended the Tasmanian Regional Forest Agreement in 2012, which maintained the RFA framework that limited EPBC Act application.

RFARFA RFA 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng 是shì shì 在zài zài HowardHoward Howard 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 下xià xià 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì 的de de ，，，并bìng bìng 由yóu yóu 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 延续yán xù yán xù [[ [ 1313 13 ]] ] 。。。

The RFA system was established under the Howard government and continued by both parties [13]. **6.

** * ** * 66 6 .. . 塔斯马尼亚tǎ sī mǎ ní yà tǎ sī mǎ ní yà 森林sēn lín sēn lín 协议xié yì xié yì 崩溃bēng kuì bēng kuì ：：： ** * ** * 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 20142014 2014 年nián nián 塔斯马尼亚tǎ sī mǎ ní yà tǎ sī mǎ ní yà 森林sēn lín sēn lín 协议xié yì xié yì （（（ TFATFA TFA ）））的de de 崩溃bēng kuì bēng kuì ，，，该gāi gāi 协议xié yì xié yì 是shì shì 在zài zài LaborLabor Labor 下xià xià 由yóu yóu 工业界gōng yè jiè gōng yè jiè 和hé hé 环保huán bǎo huán bǎo 团体tuán tǐ tuán tǐ 谈判tán pàn tán pàn 达成dá chéng dá chéng 的de de 。。。

Tasmanian Forest Agreement Collapse:** The context includes the collapse of the Tasmanian Forest Agreement (TFA) in 2014, which had been negotiated between industry and environmental groups under Labor.

AbbottAbbott Abbott 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 撤回chè huí chè huí 了le le 对duì duì TFATFA TFA 的de de 支持zhī chí zhī chí ，，，这zhè zhè 加剧jiā jù jiā jù 了le le 对duì duì 森林保护sēn lín bǎo hù sēn lín bǎo hù 的de de 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 冲突chōng tū chōng tū [[ [ 1414 14 ]] ] 。。。

The Abbott government withdrew support for the TFA, which contributed to renewed conflict over forest protection [14].

来源可信度评估

** * ** * IndependentIndependent Independent AustraliaAustralia Australia （（（原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán ）））：：： ** * ** * IndependentIndependent Independent AustraliaAustralia Australia 是shì shì 一家yī jiā yī jiā 进步jìn bù jìn bù 的de de 在线zài xiàn zài xiàn 出版物chū bǎn wù chū bǎn wù ，，，具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 明显míng xiǎn míng xiǎn 的de de 左倾zuǒ qīng zuǒ qīng 编辑biān jí biān jí 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 。。。

**Independent Australia (original source):** Independent Australia is a progressive online publication with a clear left-leaning editorial stance.

该gāi gāi 来源lái yuán lái yuán 以yǐ yǐ 发布fā bù fā bù 批评pī píng pī píng 保守政府bǎo shǒu zhèng fǔ bǎo shǒu zhèng fǔ 和hé hé 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 的de de 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 而ér ér 闻名wén míng wén míng 。。。

The source has a reputation for publishing articles critical of conservative governments and policies.

虽然suī rán suī rán 该gāi gāi 出版物chū bǎn wù chū bǎn wù 确实què shí què shí 报道bào dào bào dào 事实shì shí shì shí 信息xìn xī xìn xī ，，，但dàn dàn 其qí qí 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 始终shǐ zhōng shǐ zhōng 带有dài yǒu dài yǒu 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 性xìng xìng 和hé hé 评论性píng lùn xìng píng lùn xìng 。。。

While the publication does report factual information, its framing is consistently partisan and opinionated.

引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 的de de 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 似乎sì hū sì hū 是shì shì 评论píng lùn píng lùn 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 新闻报道xīn wén bào dào xīn wén bào dào 。。。

The article cited appears to be an opinion piece rather than straight news reporting.

读者dú zhě dú zhě 应yīng yīng 将jiāng jiāng 该gāi gāi 来源lái yuán lái yuán 视为shì wèi shì wèi 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 与yǔ yǔ 环境保护huán jìng bǎo hù huán jìng bǎo hù 利益一致lì yì yí zhì lì yì yí zhì 的de de 宣传xuān chuán xuān chuán 视角shì jiǎo shì jiǎo [[ [ 1515 15 ]] ] 。。。

Readers should approach this source as having an advocacy perspective aligned with environmental protection interests [15].

该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 对duì duì 单一dān yī dān yī 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 来源lái yuán lái yuán 的de de 依赖yī lài yī lài 是shì shì 一个yí gè yí gè 局限性jú xiàn xìng jú xiàn xìng 。。。

The claim's reliance on a single source from a partisan outlet is a limitation.

报道bào dào bào dào 该gāi gāi 问题wèn tí wèn tí 相关xiāng guān xiāng guān 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 的de de 更gèng gèng 严肃yán sù yán sù 的de de 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 来源lái yuán lái yuán （（（《《《悉尼xī ní xī ní 先驱xiān qū xiān qū 晨报chén bào chén bào 》》》、、、《《《卫报wèi bào wèi bào 》》》、、、 ABCABC ABC 新闻xīn wén xīn wén ）））提供tí gōng tí gōng 了le le 更gèng gèng 平衡píng héng píng héng 的de de coveragecoverage coverage [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。。

The more serious mainstream sources (Sydney Morning Herald, The Guardian, ABC News) that have reported on related aspects of this issue provide more balanced coverage [1][2][8].

⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做过zuò guò zuò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng ？？？

**Did Labor do something similar?** Search conducted: "Labor government Tasmania forest protection World Heritage EPBC Act" **Finding:** Labor governments took different approaches to Tasmanian forest protection: 1. **Tasmanian Forest Agreement (2012):** The Gillard Labor government supported the Tasmanian Forest Agreement, which was a negotiated settlement between environmental groups and the forestry industry that provided protection for some forests while allowing continued logging in other areas [14]. 2. **Regional Forest Agreement Extension:** In 2012, the Gillard government extended the Tasmanian RFA for another 20 years.

** * ** *

This maintained the existing RFA framework that provides certain exemptions from the EPBC Act for forestry operations [13].

搜索sōu suǒ sōu suǒ 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng ：：： "" " LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 塔斯马尼亚tǎ sī mǎ ní yà tǎ sī mǎ ní yà 森林保护sēn lín bǎo hù sēn lín bǎo hù 世界遗产shì jiè yí chǎn shì jiè yí chǎn EPBCEPBC EPBC 法fǎ fǎ "" "

This demonstrates that both major parties have maintained the RFA system that limits EPBC Act application in forestry contexts. 3. **No World Heritage Delisting Attempts:** Unlike the Coalition, Labor governments did not attempt to delist World Heritage areas.

** * ** * 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn ：：： ** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 对duì duì 塔斯马尼亚tǎ sī mǎ ní yà tǎ sī mǎ ní yà 森林保护sēn lín bǎo hù sēn lín bǎo hù 采取cǎi qǔ cǎi qǔ 了le le 不同bù tóng bù tóng 的de de 方法fāng fǎ fāng fǎ ：：：

In fact, the Hawke Labor government originally established many of Tasmania's forest protections that later became World Heritage listed [16]. **Key Differences:** - Labor pursued negotiated settlements (TFA) rather than unilateral delisting attempts - Labor maintained existing RFA frameworks but did not seek to expand logging into World Heritage areas - The Coalition's delisting attempt was a unique and unprecedented action among Australian governments

11 1 .. . ** * ** * 塔斯马尼亚tǎ sī mǎ ní yà tǎ sī mǎ ní yà 森林sēn lín sēn lín 协议xié yì xié yì （（（ 20122012 2012 年nián nián ）））：：： ** * ** * GillardGillard Gillard 领导lǐng dǎo lǐng dǎo 的de de LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 支持zhī chí zhī chí 塔斯马尼亚tǎ sī mǎ ní yà tǎ sī mǎ ní yà 森林sēn lín sēn lín 协议xié yì xié yì ，，，这是zhè shì zhè shì 环保huán bǎo huán bǎo 团体tuán tǐ tuán tǐ 与yǔ yǔ 林业lín yè lín yè 行业háng yè háng yè 之间zhī jiān zhī jiān 的de de 谈判tán pàn tán pàn 解决方案jiě jué fāng àn jiě jué fāng àn ，，，为wèi wèi 一些yī xiē yī xiē 森林sēn lín sēn lín 提供tí gōng tí gōng 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù ，，，同时tóng shí tóng shí 允许yǔn xǔ yǔn xǔ 在zài zài 其他qí tā qí tā 区域qū yù qū yù 继续jì xù jì xù 伐木fá mù fá mù [[ [ 1414 14 ]] ] 。。。

22 2 .. . ** * ** * 区域qū yù qū yù 森林sēn lín sēn lín 协议xié yì xié yì 延长yán cháng yán cháng ：：： ** * ** * 20122012 2012 年nián nián ，，， GillardGillard Gillard 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 将jiāng jiāng 塔斯马尼亚tǎ sī mǎ ní yà tǎ sī mǎ ní yà RFARFA RFA 再zài zài 延长yán cháng yán cháng 2020 20 年nián nián 。。。

这zhè zhè 维持wéi chí wéi chí 了le le 为wèi wèi 遵守zūn shǒu zūn shǒu RFARFA RFA 的de de 林业lín yè lín yè 作业zuò yè zuò yè 提供tí gōng tí gōng 某些mǒu xiē mǒu xiē EPBCEPBC EPBC 法fǎ fǎ 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn 的de de 现有xiàn yǒu xiàn yǒu RFARFA RFA 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià [[ [ 1313 13 ]] ] 。。。

这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 两大liǎng dà liǎng dà 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 都dōu dōu 维持wéi chí wéi chí 了le le 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 林业lín yè lín yè 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 下xià xià EPBCEPBC EPBC 法fǎ fǎ 适用shì yòng shì yòng 的de de RFARFA RFA 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng 。。。

33 3 .. . ** * ** * 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 世界遗产shì jiè yí chǎn shì jiè yí chǎn 除名chú míng chú míng 尝试cháng shì cháng shì ：：： ** * ** * 与yǔ yǔ CoalitionCoalition Coalition 不同bù tóng bù tóng ，，， LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 尝试cháng shì cháng shì 将jiāng jiāng 世界遗产shì jiè yí chǎn shì jiè yí chǎn 区域qū yù qū yù 除名chú míng chú míng 。。。

事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng ，，， HawkeHawke Hawke 领导lǐng dǎo lǐng dǎo 的de de LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 最初zuì chū zuì chū 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì 了le le 后来hòu lái hòu lái 成为chéng wéi chéng wéi 世界遗产shì jiè yí chǎn shì jiè yí chǎn 的de de 塔斯马尼亚tǎ sī mǎ ní yà tǎ sī mǎ ní yà 森林保护sēn lín bǎo hù sēn lín bǎo hù [[ [ 1616 16 ]] ] 。。。

** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 差异chā yì chā yì ：：： ** * ** *

-- - LaborLabor Labor 追求zhuī qiú zhuī qiú 谈判tán pàn tán pàn 解决方案jiě jué fāng àn jiě jué fāng àn （（（ TFATFA TFA ）））而ér ér 非fēi fēi 单方面dān fāng miàn dān fāng miàn 除名chú míng chú míng 尝试cháng shì cháng shì

-- - LaborLabor Labor 维持wéi chí wéi chí 现有xiàn yǒu xiàn yǒu 的de de RFARFA RFA 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià ，，，但dàn dàn 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 试图shì tú shì tú 扩大kuò dà kuò dà 在世zài shì zài shì 遗产yí chǎn yí chǎn 区域qū yù qū yù 的de de 伐木fá mù fá mù

-- - CoalitionCoalition Coalition 的de de 除名chú míng chú míng 尝试cháng shì cháng shì 是shì shì 澳大利亚政府ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ 中zhōng zhōng 独特dú tè dú tè 且qiě qiě 前所未有qián suǒ wèi yǒu qián suǒ wèi yǒu 的de de 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng

🌐

平衡视角

** * ** * 批评者pī píng zhě pī píng zhě 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng ：：： ** * ** *

**Critics' Position:** Environmental groups and critics characterized the Coalition's actions as an attack on both environmental values and World Heritage integrity.

环保huán bǎo huán bǎo 团体tuán tǐ tuán tǐ 和hé hé 批评者pī píng zhě pī píng zhě 将jiāng jiāng CoalitionCoalition Coalition 的de de 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为wèi wèi 对duì duì 环境huán jìng huán jìng 价值jià zhí jià zhí 和hé hé 世界遗产shì jiè yí chǎn shì jiè yí chǎn 完整性wán zhěng xìng wán zhěng xìng 的de de 攻击gōng jī gōng jī 。。。

The Wilderness Society described the delisting attempt as "environmental vandalism" that would expose threatened species to increased risk [17].

荒野huāng yě huāng yě 协会xié huì xié huì 将jiāng jiāng 除名chú míng chú míng 尝试cháng shì cháng shì 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为wèi wèi "" " 环境huán jìng huán jìng 破坏pò huài pò huài "" " ，，，将jiāng jiāng 使shǐ shǐ 濒危bīn wēi bīn wēi 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 面临miàn lín miàn lín 更大gèng dà gèng dà 风险fēng xiǎn fēng xiǎn [[ [ 1717 17 ]] ] 。。。

Scientists noted that many of the areas targeted for delisting contained old-growth forests and critical habitat for endangered species [4]. **Government Justification:** The Coalition argued that: 1.

科学家kē xué jiā kē xué jiā 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū ，，，许多xǔ duō xǔ duō 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 除名chú míng chú míng 的de de 区域qū yù qū yù 包含bāo hán bāo hán 原始森林yuán shǐ sēn lín yuán shǐ sēn lín 和hé hé 濒危bīn wēi bīn wēi 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 的de de 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 栖息地qī xī dì qī xī dì [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。。

Some areas within the World Heritage boundary were degraded or plantation forests that shouldn't have been included 2.

** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 辩护biàn hù biàn hù ：：： ** * ** *

Tasmania's economy needed forestry jobs 3.

CoalitionCoalition Coalition 辩称biàn chēng biàn chēng ：：：

The areas were already protected under state law even if removed from World Heritage 4.

11 1 .. . 世界遗产shì jiè yí chǎn shì jiè yí chǎn 边界biān jiè biān jiè 内nèi nèi 的de de 一些yī xiē yī xiē 区域qū yù qū yù 是shì shì 退化tuì huà tuì huà 或huò huò 人工林rén gōng lín rén gōng lín ，，，不应bù yīng bù yīng 被bèi bèi 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 在内zài nèi zài nèi

The application was simply correcting an overreach in the boundary [18] **International Perspective:** The World Heritage Committee's rejection of Australia's delisting request (with only Australia supporting it) indicates the international community viewed the proposal as lacking merit.

22 2 .. . 塔斯马尼亚tǎ sī mǎ ní yà tǎ sī mǎ ní yà 的de de 经济jīng jì jīng jì 需要xū yào xū yào 林业lín yè lín yè 工作岗位gōng zuò gǎng wèi gōng zuò gǎng wèi

The IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) recommended against the delisting, noting the areas had outstanding universal value [8]. **Outcome:** The government's attempt to reduce protections failed completely.

33 3 .. . 即使jí shǐ jí shǐ 从cóng cóng 世界遗产shì jiè yí chǎn shì jiè yí chǎn 中zhōng zhōng 移除yí chú yí chú ，，，这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 区域qū yù qū yù 也yě yě 受到shòu dào shòu dào 州zhōu zhōu 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 的de de 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù

The forests remain World Heritage listed, and the EPBC Act continues to apply.

44 4 .. . 该gāi gāi 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng 只是zhǐ shì zhǐ shì 在zài zài 纠正jiū zhèng jiū zhèng 边界biān jiè biān jiè 过度guò dù guò dù 扩张kuò zhāng kuò zhāng [[ [ 1818 18 ]] ]

This represents a case where institutional checks (UNESCO, international opinion, domestic opposition) prevented the government from achieving its stated goals. **Key Context:** This was a significant attempt to reduce environmental protections that ultimately failed.

** * ** * 国际guó jì guó jì 视角shì jiǎo shì jiǎo ：：： ** * ** *

While the claim overstates the success (no exemption was actually achieved), the intent to reduce protections for threatened species habitat was real and documented.

世界遗产shì jiè yí chǎn shì jiè yí chǎn 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 拒绝jù jué jù jué 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 的de de 除名chú míng chú míng 请求qǐng qiú qǐng qiú （（（只有zhǐ yǒu zhǐ yǒu 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 支持zhī chí zhī chí ）））表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 国际guó jì guó jì 社会shè huì shè huì 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 该gāi gāi 提案tí àn tí àn 缺乏quē fá quē fá 价值jià zhí jià zhí 。。。

世界shì jiè shì jiè 自然zì rán zì rán 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 联盟lián méng lián méng （（（ IUCNIUCN IUCN ）））建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 除名chú míng chú míng ，，，指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 区域qū yù qū yù 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 突出tū chū tū chū 的de de 普遍pǔ biàn pǔ biàn 价值jià zhí jià zhí [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。。

** * ** * 结果jié guǒ jié guǒ ：：： ** * ** *

政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 的de de 尝试cháng shì cháng shì 完全wán quán wán quán 失败shī bài shī bài 。。。

森林sēn lín sēn lín 仍然réng rán réng rán 列为liè wèi liè wèi 世界遗产shì jiè yí chǎn shì jiè yí chǎn ，，， EPBCEPBC EPBC 法fǎ fǎ 继续jì xù jì xù 适用shì yòng shì yòng 。。。

这zhè zhè 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 了le le 机构jī gòu jī gòu 制衡zhì héng zhì héng （（（教科文组织jiào kē wén zǔ zhī jiào kē wén zǔ zhī 、、、国际舆论guó jì yú lùn guó jì yú lùn 、、、国内guó nèi guó nèi 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì ）））阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 实现shí xiàn shí xiàn 其qí qí 既定目标jì dìng mù biāo jì dìng mù biāo 的de de 案例àn lì àn lì 。。。

** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ：：： ** * ** * 这是zhè shì zhè shì 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 环境保护huán jìng bǎo hù huán jìng bǎo hù 的de de 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 尝试cháng shì cháng shì ，，，但dàn dàn 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 失败shī bài shī bài 。。。

虽然suī rán suī rán 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 夸大kuā dà kuā dà 了le le 成功chéng gōng chéng gōng （（（没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 实际shí jì shí jì 实现shí xiàn shí xiàn 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn ））），，，但dàn dàn 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 对duì duì 濒危bīn wēi bīn wēi 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 栖息地qī xī dì qī xī dì 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 的de de 意图yì tú yì tú 是shì shì 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 且qiě qiě 有yǒu yǒu 记录jì lù jì lù 的de de 。。。

部分属实

5.0

/ 10

该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 包含bāo hán bāo hán 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 要素yào sù yào sù ，，，但dàn dàn 夸大kuā dà kuā dà 了le le 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 的de de 性质xìng zhì xìng zhì 和hé hé 成功chéng gōng chéng gōng ：：：

The claim contains elements of truth but overstates both the nature and success of the government's actions: 1. **TRUE elements:** The Coalition government did attempt to reduce protections for Tasmanian forests through the World Heritage delisting application, which would have effectively removed threatened species protections from those areas.

11 1 .. . ** * ** * 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 要素yào sù yào sù ：：： ** * ** * CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 试图shì tú shì tú 通过tōng guò tōng guò 世界遗产shì jiè yí chǎn shì jiè yí chǎn 除名chú míng chú míng 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 对duì duì 塔斯马尼亚tǎ sī mǎ ní yà tǎ sī mǎ ní yà 森林sēn lín sēn lín 的de de 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù ，，，这zhè zhè 将jiāng jiāng 有效yǒu xiào yǒu xiào 移除yí chú yí chú 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 区域qū yù qū yù 的de de 濒危bīn wēi bīn wēi 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 。。。

The broader pattern of prioritizing resource development over environmental protection is well-documented [1][7]. 2. **OVERSTATED elements:** The claim suggests a specific "exemption" from the EPBC Act was achieved, when in fact no such exemption was enacted.

优先yōu xiān yōu xiān 考虑kǎo lǜ kǎo lǜ 资源zī yuán zī yuán 开发kāi fā kāi fā 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 环境保护huán jìng bǎo hù huán jìng bǎo hù 的de de 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 模式mó shì mó shì 是shì shì 有yǒu yǒu 充分chōng fèn chōng fèn 记录jì lù jì lù 的de de [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。。

The delisting attempt failed, and the EPBC Act continues to apply to Tasmanian forests. 3. **MISLEADING framing:** The claim's phrasing implies successful implementation ("exempt loggers"), when the reality was an attempted reduction in protections that was blocked.

22 2 .. . ** * ** * 夸大kuā dà kuā dà 的de de 要素yào sù yào sù ：：： ** * ** * 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 暗示àn shì àn shì 实现shí xiàn shí xiàn 了le le 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 的de de EPBCEPBC EPBC 法fǎ fǎ "" " 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn "" " ，，，而ér ér 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 颁布bān bù bān bù 此类cǐ lèi cǐ lèi 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn 。。。

More accurate phrasing would be: "Attempted to remove World Heritage protection from Tasmanian forests, which would have reduced threatened species protections, but the attempt was rejected by UNESCO."

除名chú míng chú míng 尝试cháng shì cháng shì 失败shī bài shī bài 了le le ，，， EPBCEPBC EPBC 法fǎ fǎ 继续jì xù jì xù 适用shì yòng shì yòng 于yú yú 塔斯马尼亚tǎ sī mǎ ní yà tǎ sī mǎ ní yà 森林sēn lín sēn lín 。。。

33 3 .. . ** * ** * 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià ：：： ** * ** * 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 的de de 措辞cuò cí cuò cí 暗示àn shì àn shì 成功chéng gōng chéng gōng 实施shí shī shí shī （（（ "" " 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn 伐木工人fá mù gōng rén fá mù gōng rén "" " ））），，，而ér ér 现实xiàn shí xiàn shí 是shì shì 试图shì tú shì tú 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 但dàn dàn 被bèi bèi 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ 。。。

更gèng gèng 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de 措辞cuò cí cuò cí 应该yīng gāi yīng gāi 是shì shì ：：： "" " 试图shì tú shì tú 移除yí chú yí chú 塔斯马尼亚tǎ sī mǎ ní yà tǎ sī mǎ ní yà 森林sēn lín sēn lín 的de de 世界遗产shì jiè yí chǎn shì jiè yí chǎn 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù ，，，这zhè zhè 将jiāng jiāng 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 对duì duì 濒危bīn wēi bīn wēi 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 的de de 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù ，，，但dàn dàn 该gāi gāi 尝试cháng shì cháng shì 被bèi bèi 教科文组织jiào kē wén zǔ zhī jiào kē wén zǔ zhī 拒绝jù jué jù jué 。。。

"" "

最终评分

5.0

/ 10