属实

评分: 8.0/10

Coalition
C0704

声明内容

“试图引入每次看全科医生(GP)需支付7澳元费用的政策。他们声称7澳元同时足够大以起到 deterrent 作用(从而节省资金),又足够小不会阻止贫困、生病的人寻求帮助。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 在zài zài 20142014 2014 年nián nián 55 5 月yuè yuè 的de de 预算yù suàn yù suàn 中zhōng zhōng 提出tí chū tí chū 了le le 77 7 澳元ào yuán ào yuán 的de de 全科quán kē quán kē 医生yī shēng yī shēng 共gòng gòng 付费fù fèi fù fèi 用yòng yòng 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The Coalition government did indeed propose a $7 GP co-payment in the May 2014 budget [1].
该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 由yóu yóu 时任shí rèn shí rèn 卫生部长wèi shēng bù zhǎng wèi shēng bù zhǎng PeterPeter Peter DuttonDutton Dutton 宣布xuān bù xuān bù ,, , 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ TonyTony Tony AbbottAbbott Abbott 和hé hé 财政部长cái zhèng bù zhǎng cái zhèng bù zhǎng JoeJoe Joe HockeyHockey Hockey 是shì shì 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 倡导者chàng dǎo zhě chàng dǎo zhě [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The policy was announced by then-Health Minister Peter Dutton, with Prime Minister Tony Abbott and Treasurer Joe Hockey as key advocates [1].
该gāi gāi 提案tí àn tí àn 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 此前cǐ qián cǐ qián 享受xiǎng shòu xiǎng shòu 全额quán é quán é 报销bào xiāo bào xiāo 的de de 患者huàn zhě huàn zhě 从cóng cóng 20152015 2015 年nián nián 77 7 月yuè yuè 11 1 日起rì qǐ rì qǐ 为wèi wèi 全科quán kē quán kē 医生yī shēng yī shēng 会诊huì zhěn huì zhěn 、、 、 病理bìng lǐ bìng lǐ 和hé hé 影像yǐng xiàng yǐng xiàng 服务fú wù fú wù 支付zhī fù zhī fù 77 7 澳元ào yuán ào yuán [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The proposal would have required previously bulk-billed patients to pay $7 towards GP consultations, pathology, and imaging services from July 1, 2015 [1].
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 陈述chén shù chén shù 的de de 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 有yǒu yǒu 两liǎng liǎng 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn :: : (( ( 11 1 )) ) 提供tí gōng tí gōng "" " 适度shì dù shì dù 的de de 价格jià gé jià gé 信号xìn hào xìn hào "" " 以yǐ yǐ 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 他们tā men tā men 所谓suǒ wèi suǒ wèi 的de de "" " 六分钟liù fēn zhōng liù fēn zhōng 医疗yī liáo yī liáo "" " 和hé hé 不必要bù bì yào bù bì yào 的de de 医生yī shēng yī shēng 就诊jiù zhěn jiù zhěn ,, , (( ( 22 2 )) ) 为wèi wèi 医学yī xué yī xué 研究yán jiū yán jiū 未来wèi lái wèi lái 基金jī jīn jī jīn 提供tí gōng tí gōng 资金zī jīn zī jīn [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The government's stated rationale was twofold: (1) to provide a "modest price signal" to reduce what they called "six-minute medicine" and unnecessary doctor visits, and (2) to fund the Medical Research Future Fund [2].
根据gēn jù gēn jù 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 提案tí àn tí àn ,, , 每笔měi bǐ měi bǐ 77 7 澳元ào yuán ào yuán 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng 中zhōng zhōng 的de de 55 5 澳元ào yuán ào yuán 将jiāng jiāng 进入jìn rù jìn rù 医学yī xué yī xué 研究yán jiū yán jiū 未来wèi lái wèi lái 基金jī jīn jī jīn ,, , 而ér ér 22 2 澳元ào yuán ào yuán 将jiāng jiāng 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 增加zēng jiā zēng jiā 的de de 报销bào xiāo bào xiāo 额é é 留在liú zài liú zài 医生yī shēng yī shēng 手中shǒu zhōng shǒu zhōng [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
Under the original proposal, $5 of each $7 fee would go to the Medical Research Future Fund, while $2 would remain with the doctor as an increased rebate [2].
声明shēng míng shēng míng 中zhōng zhōng 对duì duì 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 信息xìn xī xìn xī 传递chuán dì chuán dì 的de de characterizationcharacterization characterization 为wèi wèi 矛盾máo dùn máo dùn 的de de 是shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de 。。 。
The claim's characterization of the government's messaging as contradictory is accurate.
CoalitionCoalition Coalition 同时tóng shí tóng shí 辩称biàn chēng biàn chēng 该gāi gāi 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng 将jiāng jiāng 起到qǐ dào qǐ dào deterrentdeterrent deterrent 作用zuò yòng zuò yòng 以yǐ yǐ 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo MedicareMedicare Medicare 成本chéng běn chéng běn (( ( 通过tōng guò tōng guò 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ 不必要bù bì yào bù bì yào 的de de 就诊jiù zhěn jiù zhěn )) ) ,, , 同时tóng shí tóng shí 又yòu yòu 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 它tā tā 足够zú gòu zú gòu modestmodest modest 不会bú huì bú huì 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ 弱势群体ruò shì qún tǐ ruò shì qún tǐ 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 医疗yī liáo yī liáo [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
The Coalition simultaneously argued that the fee would act as a deterrent to reduce Medicare costs (by discouraging unnecessary visits) while also claiming it was modest enough not to deter vulnerable people from seeking care [3].
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 明确míng què míng què 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 该gāi gāi 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng 旨在zhǐ zài zhǐ zài 成为chéng wéi chéng wéi 使shǐ shǐ 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng 更gèng gèng 高效gāo xiào gāo xiào 的de de "" " 价格jià gé jià gé 信号xìn hào xìn hào "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] ,, , 但dàn dàn 也yě yě 坚称jiān chēng jiān chēng 不会bú huì bú huì 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ 人们rén men rén men 获得huò dé huò dé 必要bì yào bì yào 的de de 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 。。 。
The government explicitly stated the fee was intended to be a "price signal" to make the system more efficient [1], but also maintained it would not prevent people from accessing necessary care.
该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 面临miàn lín miàn lín 巨大jù dà jù dà 反弹fǎn tán fǎn tán ,, , 被bèi bèi 多次duō cì duō cì 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi ,, , 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 在zài zài 20152015 2015 年nián nián 33 3 月yuè yuè 被bèi bèi 放弃fàng qì fàng qì [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
The policy faced massive backlash, was modified multiple times, and was ultimately abandoned in March 2015 [4].
卫生部长wèi shēng bù zhǎng wèi shēng bù zhǎng SussanSussan Sussan LeyLey Ley 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ "" " 根本gēn běn gēn běn 不会bú huì bú huì 继续jì xù jì xù 推进tuī jìn tuī jìn "" " ,, , 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ AbbottAbbott Abbott 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 它tā tā "" " 已死yǐ sǐ yǐ sǐ 、、 、 已yǐ yǐ 埋mái mái 、、 、 已yǐ yǐ 火化huǒ huà huǒ huà "" " [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
Health Minister Sussan Ley announced the government would not pursue it at all, with Prime Minister Abbott declaring it "dead, buried and cremated" [4].

缺失背景

该gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng 省略shěng lüè shěng lüè 了le le 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 的de de 语境yǔ jìng yǔ jìng 信息xìn xī xìn xī :: :
The claim omits several important pieces of context: **Exemptions were proposed.** The original policy included exemptions for children under 16 and concession card holders (low-income earners and pensioners) after their first ten visits per year [2].
** * ** * 曾céng céng 提议tí yì tí yì 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn 。。 。
A modified version announced in December 2014 would have made the co-payment "optional" for doctors, reducing the rebate by $5 instead [5]. **The Medical Research Future Fund connection.** The government explicitly linked the co-payment to establishing what would become a $20 billion Medical Research Future Fund [2].
** * ** * 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 对duì duì 1616 16 岁suì suì 以下yǐ xià yǐ xià 儿童ér tóng ér tóng 和hé hé 优惠卡yōu huì kǎ yōu huì kǎ 持有者chí yǒu zhě chí yǒu zhě (( ( 低收入者dī shōu rù zhě dī shōu rù zhě 和hé hé 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn 领取lǐng qǔ lǐng qǔ 者zhě zhě )) ) 的de de 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn ,, , 在zài zài 他们tā men tā men 的de de 前qián qián 十次shí cì shí cì 就诊jiù zhěn jiù zhěn 之后zhī hòu zhī hòu [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
While this doesn't resolve the logical contradiction in the messaging, it explains the policy's structure—$5 of every $7 was earmarked for medical research rather than general budget repair [2]. **No evidence of modeling.** No government modeling was ever produced to justify the claim that a co-payment would make the system more efficient rather than just add barriers to care [2].
20142014 2014 年nián nián 1212 12 月yuè yuè 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 的de de 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi 版本bǎn běn bǎn běn 将jiāng jiāng 使shǐ shǐ 共gòng gòng 付费fù fèi fù fèi 用yòng yòng 对duì duì 医生yī shēng yī shēng 来说lái shuō lái shuō "" " 可kě kě 选xuǎn xuǎn "" " ,, , 改为gǎi wéi gǎi wéi 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 55 5 澳元ào yuán ào yuán 的de de 报销bào xiāo bào xiāo 额é é [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
The policy appeared to be based on ideology rather than evidence. **The policy was never implemented.** Despite the claim's present-tense framing, the co-payment was abandoned before taking effect.
** * ** * 与yǔ yǔ 医学yī xué yī xué 研究yán jiū yán jiū 未来wèi lái wèi lái 基金jī jīn jī jīn 的de de 关联guān lián guān lián 。。 。
It existed only as a proposal from May 2014 to March 2015 [4].
** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 明确míng què míng què 将jiāng jiāng 共gòng gòng 付费fù fèi fù fèi 用yòng yòng 与yǔ yǔ 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì 将jiāng jiāng 成为chéng wéi chéng wéi 200200 200 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 医学yī xué yī xué 研究yán jiū yán jiū 未来wèi lái wèi lái 基金jī jīn jī jīn 的de de 资金zī jīn zī jīn 联系lián xì lián xì 起来qǐ lái qǐ lái [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
虽然suī rán suī rán 这zhè zhè 不能bù néng bù néng 解决jiě jué jiě jué 信息xìn xī xìn xī 传递chuán dì chuán dì 中zhōng zhōng 的de de 逻辑luó jí luó jí 矛盾máo dùn máo dùn ,, , 但dàn dàn 它tā tā 解释jiě shì jiě shì 了le le 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 的de de 结构jié gòu jié gòu —— — —— — 每笔měi bǐ měi bǐ 77 7 澳元ào yuán ào yuán 中zhōng zhōng 的de de 55 5 澳元ào yuán ào yuán 被bèi bèi 指定zhǐ dìng zhǐ dìng 用于yòng yú yòng yú 医学yī xué yī xué 研究yán jiū yán jiū 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 一般yì bān yì bān 预算yù suàn yù suàn 修复xiū fù xiū fù [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu modelingmodeling modeling 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 。。 。
** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 从未cóng wèi cóng wèi 提供tí gōng tí gōng 任何rèn hé rèn hé modelingmodeling modeling 来lái lái 证明zhèng míng zhèng míng 共gòng gòng 付费fù fèi fù fèi 用会yòng huì yòng huì 使shǐ shǐ 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng 更gèng gèng 高效gāo xiào gāo xiào 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 仅仅jǐn jǐn jǐn jǐn 增加zēng jiā zēng jiā 就医jiù yī jiù yī 障碍zhàng ài zhàng ài [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 似乎sì hū sì hū 基于jī yú jī yú 意识形态yì shí xíng tài yì shí xíng tài 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 。。 。
** * ** * 该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 从未cóng wèi cóng wèi 实施shí shī shí shī 。。 。
** * ** * 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 声明shēng míng shēng míng 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 了le le 现在xiàn zài xiàn zài 时态shí tài shí tài 的de de 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù ,, , 但dàn dàn 共gòng gòng 付费fù fèi fù fèi 用yòng yòng 在zài zài 生效shēng xiào shēng xiào 前qián qián 就jiù jiù 被bèi bèi 放弃fàng qì fàng qì 了le le 。。 。
它tā tā 仅jǐn jǐn 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 20142014 2014 年nián nián 55 5 月yuè yuè 至zhì zhì 20152015 2015 年nián nián 33 3 月yuè yuè 期间qī jiān qī jiān 的de de 提案tí àn tí àn 存在cún zài cún zài [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。

来源可信度评估

原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò :: :
The original sources include: - **News.com.au**: Mainstream Australian news outlet (News Corp Australia) - **Sydney Morning Herald**: Major Australian newspaper with generally balanced political coverage - **The Guardian Australia**: International outlet with center-left editorial stance These sources are generally credible mainstream media outlets.
-- - ** * ** * NewsNews News .. . comcom com .. . auau au ** * ** * :: : 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 机构jī gòu jī gòu (( ( NewsNews News CorpCorp Corp AustraliaAustralia Australia )) )
The News.com.au article title ("Prime Minister and Treasurer don't understand their own policy") suggests critical editorial framing, which is consistent with News Corp's generally critical stance toward the Abbott government during this period.
-- - ** * ** * SydneySydney Sydney MorningMorning Morning HeraldHerald Herald ** * ** * :: : 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 普遍pǔ biàn pǔ biàn 平衡píng héng píng héng 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 报道bào dào bào dào 的de de 大型dà xíng dà xíng 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 报纸bào zhǐ bào zhǐ
The SMH and Guardian articles report legitimate concerns raised by medical professionals and health advocates.
-- - ** * ** * TheThe The GuardianGuardian Guardian AustraliaAustralia Australia ** * ** * :: : 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 中间zhōng jiān zhōng jiān 偏左piān zuǒ piān zuǒ 编辑biān jí biān jí 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 的de de 国际guó jì guó jì 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ
这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 来源lái yuán lái yuán 是shì shì 普遍pǔ biàn pǔ biàn 可信kě xìn kě xìn 的de de 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 机构jī gòu jī gòu 。。 。
NewsNews News .. . comcom com .. . auau au 的de de 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 标题biāo tí biāo tí (( ( "" " 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ 和hé hé 财政部长cái zhèng bù zhǎng cái zhèng bù zhǎng 不bù bù 理解lǐ jiě lǐ jiě 他们tā men tā men 自己zì jǐ zì jǐ 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè "" " )) ) 暗示àn shì àn shì 了le le 批判性pī pàn xìng pī pàn xìng 的de de 编辑biān jí biān jí framingframing framing ,, , 这zhè zhè 与yǔ yǔ NewsNews News CorpCorp Corp 在此期间zài cǐ qī jiān zài cǐ qī jiān 对duì duì AbbottAbbott Abbott 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 普遍pǔ biàn pǔ biàn 批判pī pàn pī pàn 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 一致yí zhì yí zhì 。。 。
SMHSMH SMH 和hé hé GuardianGuardian Guardian 的de de 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 报道bào dào bào dào 了le le 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 专业人士zhuān yè rén shì zhuān yè rén shì 和hé hé 健康jiàn kāng jiàn kāng 倡导者chàng dǎo zhě chàng dǎo zhě 提出tí chū tí chū 的de de 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 关切guān qiè guān qiè 。。 。
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做过zuò guò zuò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng ?? ?
**Did Labor do something similar?** Yes.
** * ** *
The Labor government under Prime Minister Bob Hawke proposed a $3.50 Medicare co-payment in the August 1991 budget [6].
是shì shì 的de de 。。 。
This was half the amount of the Coalition's 2014 proposal, but the fundamental policy mechanism was identical—a patient co-payment for bulk-billed GP visits.
在zài zài 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ BobBob Bob HawkeHawke Hawke 领导lǐng dǎo lǐng dǎo 下xià xià 的de de 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 19911991 1991 年nián nián 88 8 月yuè yuè 的de de 预算yù suàn yù suàn 中zhōng zhōng 提出tí chū tí chū 了le le 3.503.50 3.50 澳元ào yuán ào yuán 的de de MedicareMedicare Medicare 共gòng gòng 付费fù fèi fù fèi 用yòng yòng [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
The Hawke/Howe Labor government introduced the co-payment without consultation, facing immediate backlash from the public, the Australian Medical Association (AMA), and factions within the ALP itself [6].
这是zhè shì zhè shì CoalitionCoalition Coalition 20142014 2014 年nián nián 提案tí àn tí àn 金额jīn é jīn é 的de de 一半yí bàn yí bàn ,, , 但dàn dàn 基本jī běn jī běn 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 机制jī zhì jī zhì 完全相同wán quán xiāng tóng wán quán xiāng tóng —— — —— — 对duì duì 全额quán é quán é 报销bào xiāo bào xiāo 的de de 全科quán kē quán kē 医生yī shēng yī shēng 就诊jiù zhěn jiù zhěn 收取shōu qǔ shōu qǔ 患者huàn zhě huàn zhě 共gòng gòng 付费fù fèi fù fèi 用yòng yòng 。。 。
Medicare architect Dr John Deeble called it "unjustified, ill-advised and destructive" [6].
HawkeHawke Hawke // / HoweHowe Howe 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 未经wèi jīng wèi jīng 协商xié shāng xié shāng 就jiù jiù 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù 了le le 共gòng gòng 付费fù fèi fù fèi 用yòng yòng ,, , 立即lì jí lì jí 面临miàn lín miàn lín 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng 、、 、 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 医学yī xué yī xué 协会xié huì xié huì (( ( AMAAMA AMA )) ) 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí ALPALP ALP 内部nèi bù nèi bù 派系pài xì pài xì 的de de 强烈qiáng liè qiáng liè 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
The ACTU opposed it, stating it was "not convinced that the [$3.50] co-payment proposal necessarily solves the problem of overservicing" [6].
MedicareMedicare Medicare 架构师jià gòu shī jià gòu shī JohnJohn John DeebleDeeble Deeble 博士bó shì bó shì 称其为chēng qí wèi chēng qí wèi "" " 不bù bù 正当zhèng dāng zhèng dāng 、、 、 不明智bù míng zhì bù míng zhì 且qiě qiě 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 破坏性pò huài xìng pò huài xìng 的de de "" " [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
The controversy was so damaging that it "arguably cost prime minister Bob Hawke the Labor leadership" [6].
ACTUACTU ACTU 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè ,, , 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì "" " 不bù bù 相信xiāng xìn xiāng xìn [[ [ 3.503.50 3.50 澳元ào yuán ào yuán ]] ] 共gòng gòng 付费fù fèi fù fèi 用yòng yòng 提案tí àn tí àn 必然bì rán bì rán 能néng néng 解决jiě jué jiě jué 过度guò dù guò dù 服务fú wù fú wù 的de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí "" " [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
The policy was suspended, modified to a reduced $2.50 charge as a face-saver, and ultimately abolished by March 1992 after Paul Keating ousted Hawke as leader [6]. **Comparison:** Both parties have attempted GP co-payments while in government.
这场zhè chǎng zhè chǎng 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì 极具jí jù jí jù 破坏性pò huài xìng pò huài xìng ,, , "" " 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ 说shuō shuō 使shǐ shǐ 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ BobBob Bob HawkeHawke Hawke 失去shī qù shī qù 了le le 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 领袖lǐng xiù lǐng xiù 职位zhí wèi zhí wèi "" " [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
The Labor proposal ($3.50, later $2.50) was smaller than the Coalition's ($7), but both faced similar opposition from medical professionals, welfare groups, and the public.
该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 被bèi bèi 暂停zàn tíng zàn tíng ,, , 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi 为wèi wèi 降低jiàng dī jiàng dī 至zhì zhì 2.502.50 2.50 澳元ào yuán ào yuán 的de de 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng 以yǐ yǐ 保全bǎo quán bǎo quán 颜面yán miàn yán miàn ,, , 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 在zài zài PaulPaul Paul KeatingKeating Keating 于yú yú 19921992 1992 年nián nián 33 3 月yuè yuè 取代qǔ dài qǔ dài HawkeHawke Hawke 成为chéng wéi chéng wéi 领袖lǐng xiù lǐng xiù 后hòu hòu 被bèi bèi 废除fèi chú fèi chú [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
Both were ultimately abandoned due to political backlash.
** * ** * 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào :: : ** * ** * 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 在zài zài 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 期间qī jiān qī jiān 都dōu dōu 尝试cháng shì cháng shì 过guò guò 全科quán kē quán kē 医生yī shēng yī shēng 共gòng gòng 付费fù fèi fù fèi 用yòng yòng 。。 。
The key difference is that Labor's attempt was in 1991, while the Coalition's was in 2014—over two decades later, with significantly higher healthcare costs and greater public expectation of universal access.
工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 的de de 提案tí àn tí àn (( ( 3.503.50 3.50 澳元ào yuán ào yuán ,, , 后hòu hòu 改为gǎi wéi gǎi wéi 2.502.50 2.50 澳元ào yuán ào yuán )) ) 比bǐ bǐ CoalitionCoalition Coalition 的de de (( ( 77 7 澳元ào yuán ào yuán )) ) 金额jīn é jīn é 小xiǎo xiǎo ,, , 但dàn dàn 两者liǎng zhě liǎng zhě 都dōu dōu 面临miàn lín miàn lín 来自lái zì lái zì 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 专业人士zhuān yè rén shì zhuān yè rén shì 、、 、 福利fú lì fú lì 团体tuán tǐ tuán tǐ 和hé hé 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng 的de de 类似lèi sì lèi sì 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 。。 。
两者liǎng zhě liǎng zhě 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 都dōu dōu 因yīn yīn 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 反弹fǎn tán fǎn tán 而ér ér 被bèi bèi 放弃fàng qì fàng qì 。。 。
关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 区别qū bié qū bié 在于zài yú zài yú ,, , 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 的de de 尝试cháng shì cháng shì 是shì shì 在zài zài 19911991 1991 年nián nián ,, , 而ér ér CoalitionCoalition Coalition 的de de 是shì shì 在zài zài 20142014 2014 年nián nián —— — —— — 二十多年èr shí duō nián èr shí duō nián 后hòu hòu ,, , 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 成本chéng běn chéng běn 显著xiǎn zhù xiǎn zhù 提高tí gāo tí gāo ,, , 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng 对duì duì 普遍pǔ biàn pǔ biàn 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 服务fú wù fú wù 的de de 期望qī wàng qī wàng 也yě yě 更gèng gèng 高gāo gāo 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

该gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng 正确zhèng què zhèng què 地dì dì 识别shí bié shí bié 了le le 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 信息xìn xī xìn xī 传递chuán dì chuán dì 中zhōng zhōng 的de de 一个yí gè yí gè 逻辑luó jí luó jí 矛盾máo dùn máo dùn :: : 一笔yī bǐ yī bǐ 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng 不能bù néng bù néng 同时tóng shí tóng shí 足够zú gòu zú gòu 大以dà yǐ dà yǐ 起到qǐ dào qǐ dào deterrentdeterrent deterrent 作用zuò yòng zuò yòng (( ( 改变gǎi biàn gǎi biàn 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi 以yǐ yǐ 节省jié shěng jié shěng 资金zī jīn zī jīn )) ) ,, , 又yòu yòu 足够zú gòu zú gòu 小xiǎo xiǎo 不会bú huì bú huì 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ 任何人rèn hé rén rèn hé rén (( ( 特别tè bié tè bié 是shì shì 需要xū yào xū yào 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 的de de 弱势群体ruò shì qún tǐ ruò shì qún tǐ )) ) [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
The claim correctly identifies a logical contradiction in the government's messaging: a fee cannot simultaneously be large enough to act as a deterrent (changing behavior to save money) and small enough not to deter anyone (particularly vulnerable people who need care) [3].
这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 矛盾máo dùn máo dùn 在zài zài 当时dāng shí dāng shí 被bèi bèi 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 批评者pī píng zhě pī píng zhě 注意zhù yì zhù yì 到dào dào 。。 。
This contradiction was widely noted by critics at the time.
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 该gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng 只zhǐ zhǐ 呈现chéng xiàn chéng xiàn 了le le 负面fù miàn fù miàn framingframing framing ,, , 而ér ér 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn :: :
However, the claim presents only the negative framing without acknowledging: 1. **The policy rationale:** The government argued that a "price signal" was necessary to address what they called "six-minute medicine" and to make Medicare sustainable [1].
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu :: : ** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 辩称biàn chēng biàn chēng ,, , "" " 价格jià gé jià gé 信号xìn hào xìn hào "" " 是shì shì 必要bì yào bì yào 的de de ,, , 以yǐ yǐ 解决jiě jué jiě jué 他们tā men tā men 所谓suǒ wèi suǒ wèi 的de de "" " 六分钟liù fēn zhōng liù fēn zhōng 医疗yī liáo yī liáo "" " 问题wèn tí wèn tí 并bìng bìng 使shǐ shǐ MedicareMedicare Medicare 可kě kě 持续chí xù chí xù 发展fā zhǎn fā zhǎn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
While experts disputed this rationale [2], it was the stated justification. 2. **The research funding connection:** The $7 fee was partially designed to fund the Medical Research Future Fund [2], not purely as a budget cut. 3. **Precedent exists across parties:** As noted above, Labor had attempted a similar policy in 1991 [6].
虽然suī rán suī rán 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 对duì duì 这zhè zhè 一yī yī 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 提出异议tí chū yì yì tí chū yì yì [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] ,, , 但dàn dàn 这zhè zhè 是shì shì 其qí qí 陈述chén shù chén shù 的de de 正当理由zhèng dāng lǐ yóu zhèng dāng lǐ yóu 。。 。
GP co-payments are not unique to Coalition ideology—they have been proposed by both major parties when facing budget pressures. 4. **The policy was abandoned:** The government ultimately listened to overwhelming opposition from doctors, patients, and the Senate, and scrapped the proposal entirely [4]. **Key context:** The logical contradiction identified in the claim is valid and was widely recognized.
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 研究yán jiū yán jiū 资金zī jīn zī jīn 关联guān lián guān lián :: : ** * ** * 77 7 澳元ào yuán ào yuán 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng 部分bù fèn bù fèn 是shì shì 为了wèi le wèi le 资助zī zhù zī zhù 医学yī xué yī xué 研究yán jiū yán jiū 未来wèi lái wèi lái 基金jī jīn jī jīn [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 纯粹chún cuì chún cuì 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 预算yù suàn yù suàn 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 。。 。
However, this type of contradictory messaging about cost-saving measures is common in politics across the spectrum.
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 跨kuà kuà 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 先例xiān lì xiān lì :: : ** * ** * 如上所述rú shàng suǒ shù rú shàng suǒ shù ,, , 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 在zài zài 19911991 1991 年nián nián 尝试cháng shì cháng shì 过guò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
The claim is factually accurate but lacks context about the policy's research funding purpose and the historical precedent of Labor's similar attempt.
全科quán kē quán kē 医生yī shēng yī shēng 共gòng gòng 付费fù fèi fù fèi 用yòng yòng 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 意识形态yì shí xíng tài yì shí xíng tài 所suǒ suǒ 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu —— — —— — 它们tā men tā men 在zài zài 两大liǎng dà liǎng dà 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 面临miàn lín miàn lín 预算yù suàn yù suàn 压力yā lì yā lì 时shí shí 都dōu dōu 被bèi bèi 提出tí chū tí chū 过guò guò 。。 。
44 4 .. . ** * ** * 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 被bèi bèi 放弃fàng qì fàng qì :: : ** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 听取tīng qǔ tīng qǔ 了le le 医生yī shēng yī shēng 、、 、 患者huàn zhě huàn zhě 和hé hé 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 的de de 压倒性yā dǎo xìng yā dǎo xìng 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 意见yì jiàn yì jiàn ,, , 完全wán quán wán quán 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 了le le 该gāi gāi 提案tí àn tí àn [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 语境yǔ jìng yǔ jìng :: : ** * ** * 声明shēng míng shēng míng 中zhōng zhōng 识别shí bié shí bié 出chū chū 的de de 逻辑luó jí luó jí 矛盾máo dùn máo dùn 是shì shì 有效yǒu xiào yǒu xiào 的de de ,, , 并bìng bìng 被bèi bèi 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 认可rèn kě rèn kě 。。 。
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 关于guān yú guān yú 节省成本jié shěng chéng běn jié shěng chéng běn 措施cuò shī cuò shī 的de de 矛盾máo dùn máo dùn 信息xìn xī xìn xī 在zài zài 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 中zhōng zhōng acrossacross across thethe the spectrumspectrum spectrum 都dōu dōu 很hěn hěn 常见cháng jiàn cháng jiàn 。。 。
该gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng 在zài zài 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què ,, , 但dàn dàn 缺乏quē fá quē fá 关于guān yú guān yú 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 研究yán jiū yán jiū 资金zī jīn zī jīn 目的mù dì mù dì 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 类似lèi sì lèi sì 尝试cháng shì cháng shì 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ 先例xiān lì xiān lì 的de de 语境yǔ jìng yǔ jìng 。。 。

属实

8.0

/ 10

该gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng 在zài zài 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 。。 。
The claim is factually accurate.
CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 在zài zài 20142014 2014 年nián nián 预算yù suàn yù suàn 中zhōng zhōng 提出tí chū tí chū 了le le 77 7 澳元ào yuán ào yuán 全科quán kē quán kē 医生yī shēng yī shēng 共gòng gòng 付费fù fèi fù fèi 用yòng yòng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] ,, , 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 们men men 确实què shí què shí 同时tóng shí tóng shí 辩称biàn chēng biàn chēng 该gāi gāi 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng 将jiāng jiāng 起到qǐ dào qǐ dào deterrentdeterrent deterrent 作用zuò yòng zuò yòng 以yǐ yǐ 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 不必要bù bì yào bù bì yào 的de de 就诊jiù zhěn jiù zhěn ,, , 同时tóng shí tóng shí 又yòu yòu 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 它tā tā 足够zú gòu zú gòu modestmodest modest 不会bú huì bú huì 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ 弱势群体ruò shì qún tǐ ruò shì qún tǐ 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 医疗yī liáo yī liáo [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
The Coalition government did propose a $7 GP co-payment in the 2014 budget [1], and government ministers did simultaneously argue that the fee would act as a deterrent to reduce unnecessary visits while also claiming it was modest enough not to deter vulnerable people from seeking care [3].
这zhè zhè 确实què shí què shí 是shì shì 一个yí gè yí gè 逻辑luó jí luó jí 矛盾máo dùn máo dùn —— — —— — 你nǐ nǐ 不能bù néng bù néng 拥有yōng yǒu yōng yǒu 一个yí gè yí gè 不会bú huì bú huì deterrentdeterrent deterrent 的de de deterrentdeterrent deterrent 。。 。
This is indeed a logical contradiction—you cannot have a deterrent that doesn't deter.
该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 从未cóng wèi cóng wèi 实施shí shī shí shī ,, , 被bèi bèi 多次duō cì duō cì 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi 以yǐ yǐ 试图shì tú shì tú 使shǐ shǐ 其qí qí 在政治上zài zhèng zhì shàng zài zhèng zhì shàng 有yǒu yǒu 可行性kě xíng xìng kě xíng xìng ,, , 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 在zài zài 20152015 2015 年nián nián 33 3 月yuè yuè 被bèi bèi 完全wán quán wán quán 放弃fàng qì fàng qì [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
The policy was never implemented, was modified multiple times in attempts to make it politically viable, and was ultimately abandoned in March 2015 [4].
对duì duì 矛盾máo dùn máo dùn 信息xìn xī xìn xī 传递chuán dì chuán dì 的de de 批评pī píng pī píng 是shì shì 有效yǒu xiào yǒu xiào 的de de ,, , 并bìng bìng 在zài zài 当时dāng shí dāng shí 被bèi bèi 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 评论员píng lùn yuán píng lùn yuán 和hé hé 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 注意zhù yì zhù yì 到dào dào 。。 。
The criticism of contradictory messaging is valid and was widely noted by commentators and medical experts at the time.

📚 来源与引用 (6)

  1. 1
    abc.net.au

    abc.net.au

    As the Government confirms the scrapping of the GP co-payment, look back at the policy's rise and fall.

    Abc Net
  2. 2
    theconversation.com

    theconversation.com

    In the government’s latest “scraping away the barnacles” of unpopular and blocked policies, prime minister Tony Abbott and health minister Peter Dutton have announced they’re abandoning the plan to have…

    The Conversation
  3. 3
    web.archive.org

    web.archive.org

    EMBARRASSING bloopers by Prime Minister Tony Abbott and Treasurer Joe Hockey have revealed they don’t understand who will be forced to pay their controversial new $7 GP fee.

    NewsComAu
  4. 4
    smh.com.au

    smh.com.au

    The Abbott government's GP co-payment has been killed off for good with Heath Minister Sussan Ley telling Coalition MPs "we are not pursuing it at all".

    The Sydney Morning Herald
  5. 5
    smh.com.au

    smh.com.au

    Unnecessary deaths, increased illness and a blowout in doctors' fees would be the outcome of the government’s proposal to introduce a GP co-payment, medical practitioners have said.

    The Sydney Morning Herald
  6. 6
    smh.com.au

    smh.com.au

    The announcement of a $3.50 co-payment for people who were bulk-billed under Medicare in the August 1991 budget arguably cost prime minister Bob Hawke the Labor leadership.

    The Sydney Morning Herald

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。