属实

评分： 8.0/10

报告问题
Coalition
C0162

声明内容

“拒绝公布澳大利亚健康保护主要委员会（AHPPC）向总理提供COVID建议的重要会议记录。”
腐败 新冠疫情
原始来源： Matthew Davis
分析时间： 29 Jan 2026

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

MorrisonMorrison Morrison 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 在zài zài COVIDCOVID COVID -- - 1919 19 疫情yì qíng yì qíng 期间qī jiān qī jiān 拒绝jù jué jù jué 公布gōng bù gōng bù 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 健康jiàn kāng jiàn kāng 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì （（ （ AHPPCAHPPC AHPPC ）） ） 的de de 会议记录huì yì jì lù huì yì jì lù 。。 。
The Morrison government did refuse to release Australian Health Protection Principal Committee (AHPPC) meeting minutes during the COVID-19 pandemic.
 多项duō xiàng duō xiàng 信息xìn xī xìn xī 自由zì yóu zì yóu 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ 20202020 2020 年nián nián 33 3 月yuè yuè 至zhì zhì 20212021 2021 年nián nián 期间qī jiān qī jiān 的de de AHPPCAHPPC AHPPC 会议记录huì yì jì lù huì yì jì lù 均jūn jūn 被bèi bèi 拒绝jù jué jù jué [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
Multiple Freedom of Information requests for AHPPC minutes were declined between March 2020 and 2021 [1][2].
 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 内阁nèi gé nèi gé 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn 适用shì yòng shì yòng 于yú yú 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 记录jì lù jì lù ，， ， 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn AHPPCAHPPC AHPPC 是shì shì 一个yí gè yí gè 完全wán quán wán quán 由非yóu fēi yóu fēi 部长级bù zhǎng jí bù zhǎng jí 卫生wèi shēng wèi shēng 官员guān yuán guān yuán 组成zǔ chéng zǔ chéng 的de de 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì （（ （ 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 首席shǒu xí shǒu xí 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 官guān guān 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 各州gè zhōu gè zhōu 和hé hé 领地lǐng dì lǐng dì 的de de 首席shǒu xí shǒu xí 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 官guān guān ）） ） [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
The government claimed that cabinet exemption applied to the minutes, despite AHPPC being a committee composed entirely of non-ministerial health officials (the Commonwealth Chief Medical Officer plus each state and territory's Chief Medical Officer) [3].
 最zuì zuì 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 的de de 事实shì shí shì shí 进展jìn zhǎn jìn zhǎn 发生fā shēng fā shēng 在zài zài 20212021 2021 年nián nián 88 8 月yuè yuè 55 5 日rì rì ，， ， 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng 上诉shàng sù shàng sù 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 裁定cái dìng cái dìng MorrisonMorrison Morrison 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 不bù bù 正确zhèng què zhèng què 。。 。
The most significant factual development came on August 5, 2021, when the Administrative Appeals Tribunal ruled that the Morrison government's legal position was incorrect.
 仲裁庭zhòng cái tíng zhòng cái tíng 认定rèn dìng rèn dìng ，， ， NationalNational National CabinetCabinet Cabinet （（ （ AHPPCAHPPC AHPPC 是shì shì 其qí qí 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 的de de 顾问gù wèn gù wèn 小组xiǎo zǔ xiǎo zǔ 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì ）） ） 不bù bù 构成gòu chéng gòu chéng 信息xìn xī xìn xī 自由zì yóu zì yóu 法fǎ fǎ 意义yì yì yì yì 上shàng shàng 的de de 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 内阁nèi gé nèi gé ，， ， 因此yīn cǐ yīn cǐ 内阁nèi gé nèi gé 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn 不能bù néng bù néng 合法hé fǎ hé fǎ 适用shì yòng shì yòng 于yú yú 其qí qí 记录jì lù jì lù [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
The tribunal determined that the National Cabinet (of which AHPPC was a key advisory subcommittee) did not qualify as a genuine cabinet under the Freedom of Information Act, and therefore cabinet exemption could not legally apply to its records [4].
 然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 有yǒu yǒu 此cǐ cǐ 裁决cái jué cái jué ，， ， MorrisonMorrison Morrison 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 仍réng réng 继续jì xù jì xù 拒绝jù jué jù jué 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn ，， ， 并于bìng yú bìng yú 20212021 2021 年nián nián 99 9 月yuè yuè 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ ，， ， 试图shì tú shì tú 以yǐ yǐ 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 方式fāng shì fāng shì 推翻tuī fān tuī fān 仲裁庭zhòng cái tíng zhòng cái tíng 的de de 裁决cái jué cái jué [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
However, despite this ruling, the Morrison government continued to refuse access to the documents and subsequently introduced legislation in September 2021 to attempt to legislatively override the tribunal's decision [5].
 议会yì huì yì huì 记录jì lù jì lù 确认què rèn què rèn ，， ， AHPPCAHPPC AHPPC 在zài zài 疫情yì qíng yì qíng 期间qī jiān qī jiān 向xiàng xiàng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 领导人lǐng dǎo rén lǐng dǎo rén 提供tí gōng tí gōng 了le le 官方guān fāng guān fāng 健康jiàn kāng jiàn kāng 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
The Parliamentary record confirms that AHPPC provided official health advice to government leaders during the pandemic [6].
 AHPPCAHPPC AHPPC 的de de 会议huì yì huì yì 和hé hé 决议jué yì jué yì 被bèi bèi 正式zhèng shì zhèng shì 记录jì lù jì lù ，， ， 会议记录huì yì jì lù huì yì jì lù 旨在zhǐ zài zhǐ zài 供gōng gōng NationalNational National CabinetCabinet Cabinet （（ （ 由yóu yóu 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ 主持zhǔ chí zhǔ chí ）） ） 审议shěn yì shěn yì [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。 。
AHPPC meetings and resolutions were documented formally, with minutes intended for consideration by the National Cabinet (chaired by the Prime Minister) [7].

缺失背景

该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 未wèi wèi 涉及shè jí shè jí 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 的de de 语境yǔ jìng yǔ jìng 因素yīn sù yīn sù ：： ：
Several important contextual factors are not addressed by this claim: **Specific incidents vs. systematic practice:** The claim refers to "an important meeting" (singular) but the evidence shows this was actually a systematic refusal affecting multiple AHPPC meetings from March 2020 onwards, rather than a single incident [1][2].
 ** * ** * 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn 与yǔ yǔ 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ ：： ： ** * ** * 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 提到tí dào tí dào "" " 一次yī cì yī cì 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 会议huì yì huì yì "" " （（ （ 单数dān shù dān shù ）） ） ，， ， 但dàn dàn 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 这zhè zhè 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 是从shì cóng shì cóng 20202020 2020 年nián nián 33 3 月yuè yuè 开始kāi shǐ kāi shǐ 的de de 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 拒绝jù jué jù jué 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi ，， ， 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 多个duō gè duō gè AHPPCAHPPC AHPPC 会议huì yì huì yì ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 单一dān yī dān yī 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The breadth of the secrecy attempt extends beyond any one meeting. **The legal complexity:** Some AHPPC FOI requests were declined as "information not held" rather than explicitly refused under exemption [1].
 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì 尝试cháng shì cháng shì 的de de 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi 超出chāo chū chāo chū 了le le 任何rèn hé rèn hé 一次yī cì yī cì 会议huì yì huì yì 。。 。
This distinction is legally and factually important, though both outcomes resulted in non-release of sought information. **Governmental justification:** The Morrison government's stated rationale was that cabinet confidentiality is necessary for candid government decision-making [8].
 ** * ** * 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 复杂性fù zá xìng fù zá xìng ：： ： ** * ** * 部分bù fèn bù fèn AHPPCAHPPC AHPPC 信息xìn xī xìn xī 自由zì yóu zì yóu 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng 被bèi bèi 以yǐ yǐ "" " 信息xìn xī xìn xī 未wèi wèi 保存bǎo cún bǎo cún "" " 为wèi wèi 由yóu yóu 拒绝jù jué jù jué ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 明确míng què míng què 根据gēn jù gēn jù 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn 条款tiáo kuǎn tiáo kuǎn 拒绝jù jué jù jué [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
However, this argument was specifically rejected by the AAT, which noted that the minutes record formal outcomes rather than deliberative discussion, and that release would not reasonably be expected to discourage frank discussion in future meetings [4]. **The bipartisan continuation:** Critically, the Albanese government that replaced Morrison has also refused to release National Cabinet and AHPPC minutes [9].
 这一zhè yī zhè yī 区别qū bié qū bié 在zài zài 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 和hé hé 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng 都dōu dōu 很hěn hěn 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào ，， ， 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 两种liǎng zhǒng liǎng zhǒng 结果jié guǒ jié guǒ 都dōu dōu 导致dǎo zhì dǎo zhì 所suǒ suǒ 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 的de de 信息xìn xī xìn xī 未予wèi yǔ wèi yǔ 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 。。 。
This context substantially changes the narrative from "a Coalition corruption issue" to "a bi-partisan transparency failure." The Albanese government has arguably made transparency worse: FOI request grant rates have declined from approximately 50% to 25%, and public interest immunity claims have increased significantly [10]. **Current status ambiguity:** While research cannot definitively confirm the current status (2024-2025) of whether any AHPPC minutes have been released since May 2022, the continuation of secrecy practices under Labor suggests they likely remain unreleased [9].
 ** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu ：： ： ** * ** * MorrisonMorrison Morrison 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 声明shēng míng shēng míng 的de de 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 是shì shì 内阁nèi gé nèi gé 保密性bǎo mì xìng bǎo mì xìng 对于duì yú duì yú 坦诚tǎn chéng tǎn chéng 的de de 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 决策jué cè jué cè 是shì shì 必要bì yào bì yào 的de de [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。 。
然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， 这一zhè yī zhè yī 论点lùn diǎn lùn diǎn 被bèi bèi AATAAT AAT 明确míng què míng què 驳回bó huí bó huí ，， ， 该gāi gāi 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū 会议记录huì yì jì lù huì yì jì lù 记录jì lù jì lù 的de de 是shì shì 正式zhèng shì zhèng shì 结果jié guǒ jié guǒ 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 审议shěn yì shěn yì 性xìng xìng 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn ，， ， 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 记录jì lù jì lù 不会bú huì bú huì 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 地dì dì 预期yù qī yù qī 会huì huì 阻碍zǔ ài zǔ ài 未来wèi lái wèi lái 会议huì yì huì yì 中zhōng zhōng 的de de 坦诚tǎn chéng tǎn chéng 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 延续性yán xù xìng yán xù xìng ：： ： ** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 的de de 是shì shì ，， ， 取代qǔ dài qǔ dài MorrisonMorrison Morrison 的de de AlbaneseAlbanese Albanese 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 也yě yě 拒绝jù jué jù jué 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi NationalNational National CabinetCabinet Cabinet 和hé hé AHPPCAHPPC AHPPC 会议记录huì yì jì lù huì yì jì lù [[ [ 99 9 ]] ] 。。 。
这一zhè yī zhè yī 语境yǔ jìng yǔ jìng 将jiāng jiāng 叙述xù shù xù shù 从cóng cóng "" " 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 的de de 腐败问题fǔ bài wèn tí fǔ bài wèn tí "" " 转变zhuǎn biàn zhuǎn biàn 为wèi wèi "" " 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 失败shī bài shī bài "" " 。。 。
AlbaneseAlbanese Albanese 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn arguablyarguably arguably 变得biàn dé biàn dé 更糟gèng zāo gèng zāo ：： ： 信息xìn xī xìn xī 自由zì yóu zì yóu 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng 的de de 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn 率lǜ lǜ 从cóng cóng 约yuē yuē 50%50% 50% 下降xià jiàng xià jiàng 到dào dào 25%25% 25% ，， ， 公共利益gōng gòng lì yì gōng gòng lì yì 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng 显著xiǎn zhù xiǎn zhù 增加zēng jiā zēng jiā [[ [ 1010 10 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 当前dāng qián dāng qián 状态zhuàng tài zhuàng tài 模糊mó hú mó hú ：： ： ** * ** * 虽然suī rán suī rán 研究yán jiū yán jiū 无法wú fǎ wú fǎ 明确míng què míng què 确认què rèn què rèn 目前mù qián mù qián （（ （ 20242024 2024 -- - 20252025 2025 年nián nián ）） ） 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 有yǒu yǒu 任何rèn hé rèn hé AHPPCAHPPC AHPPC 记录jì lù jì lù 自zì zì 20222022 2022 年nián nián 55 5 月yuè yuè 以来yǐ lái yǐ lái 已yǐ yǐ 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi ，， ， 但dàn dàn 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 继续jì xù jì xù 实行shí xíng shí xíng 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì 的de de 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 记录jì lù jì lù 可能kě néng kě néng 仍réng réng 未公开wèi gōng kāi wèi gōng kāi [[ [ 99 9 ]] ] 。。 。

来源可信度评估

** * ** * 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng ：： ： ** * ** *
**Original sources claimed:** - Sydney Morning Herald (SMH) - The Guardian Australia While both outlets are mainstream, reputable news organizations with good track records on government accountability, the specific articles referenced in the claim file could not be definitively located in research.
 -- - SydneySydney Sydney MorningMorning Morning HeraldHerald Herald (( ( SMHSMH SMH )) )
However, multiple credible sources confirm the underlying facts. **Sources that verified the claim:** Michael West Media [1] is a credible investigative journalist specializing in government accountability, with direct access to Freedom of Information requests and court documents.
 -- - TheThe The GuardianGuardian Guardian AustraliaAustralia Australia
While left-leaning in transparency advocacy, his reporting is evidence-based and cites primary sources [1][2][9].
 虽然suī rán suī rán 这zhè zhè 两家liǎng jiā liǎng jiā 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 都dōu dōu 是shì shì 有yǒu yǒu 良好liáng hǎo liáng hǎo 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 问责wèn zé wèn zé 记录jì lù jì lù 的de de 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 、、 、 知名zhī míng zhī míng 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 机构jī gòu jī gòu ，， ， 但dàn dàn 研究yán jiū yán jiū 中zhōng zhōng 无法wú fǎ wú fǎ 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 定位dìng wèi dìng wèi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 中zhōng zhōng 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 的de de 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 。。 。
The Administrative Appeals Tribunal ruling [4] is a primary source of the highest credibility—an independent judicial body that examined the government's legal claims and rejected them.
 然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， 多个duō gè duō gè 可靠kě kào kě kào 来源lái yuán lái yuán 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí 了le le 基本jī běn jī běn 事实shì shí shì shí 。。 。
Right to Know (https://www.righttoknow.org.au/) is a neutral FOI request tracking platform that documents government responses verbatim, providing primary source evidence [1][2].
 ** * ** * 验证yàn zhèng yàn zhèng 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 的de de 来源lái yuán lái yuán ：： ： ** * ** *
The Conversation and Grattan Institute analysis [4][7][8] represent university-backed academic journalism that documents policy decisions with supporting evidence.
 MichaelMichael Michael WestWest West MediaMedia Media [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 是shì shì 一位yī wèi yī wèi 专注zhuān zhù zhuān zhù 于yú yú 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 问责wèn zé wèn zé 的de de 可信kě xìn kě xìn 调查diào chá diào chá 记者jì zhě jì zhě ，， ， 可kě kě 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 获取信息huò qǔ xìn xī huò qǔ xìn xī 自由zì yóu zì yóu 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng 和hé hé 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 。。 。
The Centre for Public Integrity [10] is a non-partisan government transparency watchdog. **Bias assessment:** The overall evidence base is credible despite some sources having a left-leaning transparency advocacy orientation.
 虽然suī rán suī rán 在zài zài 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 偏左piān zuǒ piān zuǒ ，， ， 但dàn dàn 其qí qí 报道bào dào bào dào 基于jī yú jī yú 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 并bìng bìng 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 99 9 ]] ] 。。 。
The core facts are supported by independent judiciary rulings and official government records, not merely opinion pieces.
 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng 上诉shàng sù shàng sù 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 裁决cái jué cái jué [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 是shì shì 最高zuì gāo zuì gāo 可信度kě xìn dù kě xìn dù 的de de 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán —— — —— — 一个yí gè yí gè 独立dú lì dú lì 司法sī fǎ sī fǎ 机构jī gòu jī gòu 审查shěn chá shěn chá 了le le 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 并bìng bìng 予以yǔ yǐ yǔ yǐ 驳回bó huí bó huí 。。 。
RightRight Right toto to KnowKnow Know (( ( httpshttps https :: : // / // / wwwwww www .. . righttoknowrighttoknow righttoknow .. . orgorg org .. . auau au // / )) ) 是shì shì 一个yí gè yí gè 中性zhōng xìng zhōng xìng 的de de 信息xìn xī xìn xī 自由zì yóu zì yóu 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng 追踪zhuī zōng zhuī zōng 平台píng tái píng tái ，， ， 逐字zhú zì zhú zì 记录jì lù jì lù 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 回应huí yìng huí yìng ，， ， 提供tí gōng tí gōng 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
TheThe The ConversationConversation Conversation 和hé hé GrattanGrattan Grattan InstituteInstitute Institute 分析fēn xī fēn xī [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 大学dà xué dà xué 支持zhī chí zhī chí 的de de 学术xué shù xué shù 新闻xīn wén xīn wén ，， ， 以yǐ yǐ 支持性zhī chí xìng zhī chí xìng 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 记录jì lù jì lù 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 决策jué cè jué cè 。。 。
CentreCentre Centre forfor for PublicPublic Public IntegrityIntegrity Integrity [[ [ 1010 10 ]] ] 是shì shì 一个yí gè yí gè 无党派wú dǎng pài wú dǎng pài 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 监督机构jiān dū jī gòu jiān dū jī gòu 。。 。
** * ** * 偏见piān jiàn piān jiàn 评估píng gū píng gū ：： ： ** * ** * 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 部分bù fèn bù fèn 来源lái yuán lái yuán 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 偏左piān zuǒ piān zuǒ 的de de 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng ，， ， 但dàn dàn 整体zhěng tǐ zhěng tǐ 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 基础jī chǔ jī chǔ 是shì shì 可信kě xìn kě xìn 的de de 。。 。
核心hé xīn hé xīn 事实shì shí shì shí 得到dé dào dé dào 独立dú lì dú lì 司法sī fǎ sī fǎ 裁决cái jué cái jué 和hé hé 官方guān fāng guān fāng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 记录jì lù jì lù 的de de 支持zhī chí zhī chí ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 仅仅jǐn jǐn jǐn jǐn 是shì shì 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 。。 。
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做过zuò guò zuò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng ？？ ？
**Did Labor do something similar?** Search conducted: "Albanese government National Cabinet minutes transparency FOI refused" **Finding:** The Labor government under Anthony Albanese has NOT improved transparency on AHPPC/National Cabinet minutes and has arguably made government secrecy worse.
 ** * ** *
This is a crucial context omission from the original claim.
 搜索sōu suǒ sōu suǒ 内容nèi róng nèi róng ：： ： "" " AlbaneseAlbanese Albanese governmentgovernment government NationalNational National CabinetCabinet Cabinet minutesminutes minutes transparencytransparency transparency FOIFOI FOI refusedrefused refused "" "
Evidence of Labor's continuation and expansion of secrecy: - The Albanese government also refuses National Cabinet and AHPPC minutes, despite the AAT ruling that should have required release [9] - FOI transparency transparency has declined: only 25% of FOI requests were fully granted in 2023-24, down from approximately 50% in 2021-22 [10] - Public interest immunity claims (legal assertions blocking document release) have increased under Labor, now approximately 1 per week compared to Morrison's 1 per 3 weeks [10] - The Albanese government stripped Australians of a "40-year right of access" to inter-governmental forum minutes by not implementing transparency reforms despite campaign promises [9] - Labor introduced FOI legislative changes that actually expand cabinet exemption scope by changing the test from "dominant purpose" to "substantive purpose," making exemption claims easier to sustain [10] This pattern directly contradicts Labor's pre-election transparency commitments [9][10].
 ** * ** * 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn ：： ： ** * ** * AlbaneseAlbanese Albanese 领导lǐng dǎo lǐng dǎo 下xià xià 的de de 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 改善gǎi shàn gǎi shàn AHPPCAHPPC AHPPC // / NationalNational National CabinetCabinet Cabinet 会议记录huì yì jì lù huì yì jì lù 的de de 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù ，， ， 且qiě qiě arguablyarguably arguably 使shǐ shǐ 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì 变得biàn dé biàn dé 更糟gèng zāo gèng zāo 。。 。
Rather than a corruption issue unique to the Coalition, this appears to be a bi-partisan commitment to government secrecy.
 这是zhè shì zhè shì 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 中zhōng zhōng 一个yí gè yí gè 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 的de de 语境yǔ jìng yǔ jìng 缺失quē shī quē shī 。。 。
工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 延续yán xù yán xù 和hé hé 扩大kuò dà kuò dà 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì 的de de 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù ：： ：
-- - AlbaneseAlbanese Albanese 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 也yě yě 拒绝jù jué jù jué 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi NationalNational National CabinetCabinet Cabinet 和hé hé AHPPCAHPPC AHPPC 会议记录huì yì jì lù huì yì jì lù ，， ， 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn AATAAT AAT 裁决cái jué cái jué 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi [[ [ 99 9 ]] ]
-- - 信息xìn xī xìn xī 自由zì yóu zì yóu 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 下降xià jiàng xià jiàng ：： ： 20232023 2023 -- - 2424 24 年度nián dù nián dù 仅jǐn jǐn 有yǒu yǒu 25%25% 25% 的de de 信息xìn xī xìn xī 自由zì yóu zì yóu 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng 获得huò dé huò dé 完全wán quán wán quán 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn ，， ， 低于dī yú dī yú 20212021 2021 -- - 2222 22 年nián nián 的de de 约yuē yuē 50%50% 50% [[ [ 1010 10 ]] ]
-- - 公共利益gōng gòng lì yì gōng gòng lì yì 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng （（ （ 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 的de de 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng ）） ） 在zài zài 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 下xià xià 增加zēng jiā zēng jiā ，， ， 目前mù qián mù qián 约yuē yuē 每周měi zhōu měi zhōu 11 1 次cì cì ，， ， 而ér ér MorrisonMorrison Morrison 时期shí qī shí qī 为wèi wèi 每měi měi 33 3 周zhōu zhōu 11 1 次cì cì [[ [ 1010 10 ]] ]
-- - AlbaneseAlbanese Albanese 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 剥夺bō duó bō duó 了le le 澳大利亚人ào dà lì yà rén ào dà lì yà rén "" " 4040 40 年来nián lái nián lái 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ "" " 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 间jiān jiān 论坛lùn tán lùn tán 会议记录huì yì jì lù huì yì jì lù 的de de 权利quán lì quán lì ，， ， 未wèi wèi 兑现duì xiàn duì xiàn 竞选jìng xuǎn jìng xuǎn 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 实施shí shī shí shī 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé [[ [ 99 9 ]] ]
-- - 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù 了le le 信息xìn xī xìn xī 自由zì yóu zì yóu 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi ，， ， 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 扩大kuò dà kuò dà 了le le 内阁nèi gé nèi gé 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi ，， ， 将jiāng jiāng 测试cè shì cè shì 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 从cóng cóng "" " 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 目的mù dì mù dì "" " 改为gǎi wéi gǎi wéi "" " 实质性shí zhì xìng shí zhì xìng 目的mù dì mù dì "" " ，， ， 使shǐ shǐ 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng 更gèng gèng 容易róng yì róng yì 维持wéi chí wéi chí [[ [ 1010 10 ]] ]
这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 模式mó shì mó shì 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 违背wéi bèi wéi bèi 了le le 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 的de de 选前xuǎn qián xuǎn qián 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò [[ [ 99 9 ]] ] [[ [ 1010 10 ]] ] 。。 。
这zhè zhè 看起来kàn qǐ lái kàn qǐ lái 不是bú shì bú shì 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu 的de de 腐败问题fǔ bài wèn tí fǔ bài wèn tí ，， ， 而是ér shì ér shì 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 对duì duì 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì 的de de 共同gòng tóng gòng tóng 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 声明shēng míng shēng míng 的de de 论点lùn diǎn lùn diǎn ：： ： ** * ** * 一定yí dìng yí dìng 程度chéng dù chéng dù 的de de 内阁nèi gé nèi gé 保密性bǎo mì xìng bǎo mì xìng 对于duì yú duì yú 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 正常zhèng cháng zhèng cháng 运作yùn zuò yùn zuò 是shì shì 必要bì yào bì yào 的de de —— — —— — 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 和hé hé 顾问gù wèn gù wèn 需要xū yào xū yào 确信què xìn què xìn 坦诚tǎn chéng tǎn chéng 的de de 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn 将jiāng jiāng 保持bǎo chí bǎo chí 私密sī mì sī mì ，， ， 以便yǐ biàn yǐ biàn 能够néng gòu néng gòu 自由zì yóu zì yóu 交换意见jiāo huàn yì jiàn jiāo huàn yì jiàn 和hé hé 考虑kǎo lǜ kǎo lǜ 困难kùn nán kùn nán 选项xuǎn xiàng xuǎn xiàng [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。 。
**Government's stated argument:** Some degree of cabinet confidentiality is necessary for government to function properly—ministers and advisors need confidence that candid discussions will remain private to enable frank exchange of views and consideration of difficult options [8]. **Why this argument was rejected:** The AAT specifically addressed and rejected this argument, finding that AHPPC minutes (which record formal outcomes and advice, not internal deliberative discussion) would not reasonably be expected to suppress candid future discussion [4].
 ** * ** * 为何wèi hé wèi hé 这一zhè yī zhè yī 论点lùn diǎn lùn diǎn 被bèi bèi 驳回bó huí bó huí ：： ： ** * ** * AATAAT AAT 明确míng què míng què 论述lùn shù lùn shù 并bìng bìng 驳回bó huí bó huí 了le le 这zhè zhè 一yī yī 论点lùn diǎn lùn diǎn ，， ， 认定rèn dìng rèn dìng AHPPCAHPPC AHPPC 会议记录huì yì jì lù huì yì jì lù （（ （ 记录jì lù jì lù 正式zhèng shì zhèng shì 结果jié guǒ jié guǒ 和hé hé 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 内部nèi bù nèi bù 审议shěn yì shěn yì 性xìng xìng 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn ）） ） 的de de 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 不会bú huì bú huì 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 地dì dì 预期yù qī yù qī 会huì huì 抑制yì zhì yì zhì 未来wèi lái wèi lái 的de de 坦诚tǎn chéng tǎn chéng 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
Additionally, AHPPC is not a cabinet body—it has no ministers, only health officials.
 此外cǐ wài cǐ wài ，， ， AHPPCAHPPC AHPPC 不是bú shì bú shì 内阁nèi gé nèi gé 机构jī gòu jī gòu —— — —— — 它tā tā 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng ，， ， 只有zhǐ yǒu zhǐ yǒu 卫生wèi shēng wèi shēng 官员guān yuán guān yuán 。。 。
The "cabinet exemption" claim was legally incorrect from the outset [4]. **Transparency advocates' argument:** Health emergency committees advising on policies affecting millions of Australians during a pandemic should operate with public scrutiny and accountability [7][8].
 "" " 内阁nèi gé nèi gé 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn "" " 的de de 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 从cóng cóng 一yī yī 开始kāi shǐ kāi shǐ 在zài zài 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 上shàng shàng 就是jiù shì jiù shì 错误cuò wù cuò wù 的de de [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
The public has a right to understand the advice given to government on critical COVID-19 decisions that affected lockdowns, restrictions, and health outcomes. **The complexity factor:** There is a distinction between actively "refusing" to release documents (claiming exemption) versus claiming documents are "not held" or were not formally created.
 ** * ** * 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 倡导者chàng dǎo zhě chàng dǎo zhě 的de de 论点lùn diǎn lùn diǎn ：： ： ** * ** * 在zài zài 疫情yì qíng yì qíng 期间qī jiān qī jiān 为wèi wèi 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 数百万shù bǎi wàn shù bǎi wàn 澳大利亚人ào dà lì yà rén ào dà lì yà rén 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 提供tí gōng tí gōng 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 的de de 卫生wèi shēng wèi shēng 紧急jǐn jí jǐn jí 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 应yīng yīng 在zài zài 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng 监督jiān dū jiān dū 和hé hé 问责下wèn zé xià wèn zé xià 运作yùn zuò yùn zuò [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。 。
Some AHPPC FOI requests appear to have been declined on the latter basis, suggesting possible record-keeping gaps rather than deliberate suppression.
 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng 有权yǒu quán yǒu quán 了解liǎo jiě liǎo jiě 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 封锁fēng suǒ fēng suǒ 、、 、 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 和hé hé 健康jiàn kāng jiàn kāng 结果jié guǒ jié guǒ 的de de COVIDCOVID COVID -- - 1919 19 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 决策jué cè jué cè 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 获得huò dé huò dé 的de de 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 。。 。
However, this distinction, while legally important, does not change the outcome: information sought by the public remained unavailable. **Critical missing analysis:** What makes this claim incomplete is the failure to note that both major Australian political parties have committed to government secrecy on the same issue.
 ** * ** * 复杂性fù zá xìng fù zá xìng 因素yīn sù yīn sù ：： ： ** * ** * "" " 拒绝jù jué jù jué "" " 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn （（ （ 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn ）） ） 与yǔ yǔ 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn "" " 未wèi wèi 保存bǎo cún bǎo cún "" " 或huò huò 未wèi wèi 被bèi bèi 正式zhèng shì zhèng shì 创建chuàng jiàn chuàng jiàn 之间zhī jiān zhī jiān 存在cún zài cún zài 区别qū bié qū bié 。。 。
The Morrison government lost a court case requiring transparency and defied it; the Albanese government simply continued the defiance without even mounting a legal fight.
 部分bù fèn bù fèn AHPPCAHPPC AHPPC 信息xìn xī xìn xī 自由zì yóu zì yóu 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng 似乎sì hū sì hū 以后yǐ hòu yǐ hòu 者zhě zhě 为wèi wèi 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 被bèi bèi 拒绝jù jué jù jué ，， ， 暗示àn shì àn shì 可能kě néng kě néng 存在cún zài cún zài 记录jì lù jì lù 保存bǎo cún bǎo cún 缺口quē kǒu quē kǒu 而ér ér 非故意fēi gù yì fēi gù yì 压制yā zhì yā zhì 。。 。
If anything, this is a systemic issue across Australian government, not a Coalition-specific "corruption" problem.
 然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， 这一zhè yī zhè yī 区别qū bié qū bié 虽然suī rán suī rán 在zài zài 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 上shàng shàng 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào ，， ， 但dàn dàn 并bìng bìng 不bù bù 改变gǎi biàn gǎi biàn 结果jié guǒ jié guǒ ：： ： 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 的de de 信息xìn xī xìn xī 仍然réng rán réng rán 无法wú fǎ wú fǎ 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ 。。 。
The Albanese government's failure to act on transparency promises after criticizing Morrison's secrecy suggests this may be less about policy views and more about what all governments prefer when in power.
 ** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 缺失quē shī quē shī 分析fēn xī fēn xī ：： ： ** * ** * 使shǐ shǐ 这zhè zhè 一yī yī 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 不bù bù 完整wán zhěng wán zhěng 的de de 是shì shì 未能wèi néng wèi néng 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 两大liǎng dà liǎng dà 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 都dōu dōu 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 在zài zài 这zhè zhè 一yī yī 问题wèn tí wèn tí 上shàng shàng 实行shí xíng shí xíng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì 。。 。
MorrisonMorrison Morrison 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 的de de 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 案件àn jiàn àn jiàn 中zhōng zhōng 败诉bài sù bài sù 并bìng bìng 违抗wéi kàng wéi kàng 裁决cái jué cái jué ；； ； AlbaneseAlbanese Albanese 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 只是zhǐ shì zhǐ shì 继续jì xù jì xù 违抗wéi kàng wéi kàng ，， ， 甚至shèn zhì shèn zhì 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 斗争dòu zhēng dòu zhēng 。。 。
如果说rú guǒ shuō rú guǒ shuō 有yǒu yǒu 什么shén me shén me 不同bù tóng bù tóng ，， ， 这是zhè shì zhè shì 澳大利亚政府ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ 的de de 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 问题wèn tí wèn tí ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 特有tè yǒu tè yǒu 的de de "" " 腐败fǔ bài fǔ bài "" " 问题wèn tí wèn tí 。。 。
AlbaneseAlbanese Albanese 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 批评pī píng pī píng MorrisonMorrison Morrison 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì 的de de 同时tóng shí tóng shí 未能wèi néng wèi néng 兑现duì xiàn duì xiàn 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò ，， ， 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 这zhè zhè 可能kě néng kě néng 更gèng gèng 多duō duō 是shì shì 关于guān yú guān yú 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 执政党zhí zhèng dǎng zhí zhèng dǎng 在位zài wèi zài wèi 时shí shí 的de de 偏好piān hǎo piān hǎo ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn 。。 。

属实

8.0

/ 10

关于guān yú guān yú MorrisonMorrison Morrison 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 拒绝jù jué jù jué 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi AHPPCAHPPC AHPPC COVIDCOVID COVID -- - 1919 19 会议记录huì yì jì lù huì yì jì lù 的de de 核心hé xīn hé xīn 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 是shì shì 事实shì shí shì shí 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de ，， ， 并bìng bìng 通过tōng guò tōng guò 多个duō gè duō gè 独立dú lì dú lì 来源lái yuán lái yuán 得到dé dào dé dào 充分chōng fèn chōng fèn 记录jì lù jì lù ，， ， 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò AATAAT AAT 仲裁庭zhòng cái tíng zhòng cái tíng 裁决cái jué cái jué [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
The core claim that the Morrison government refused to release AHPPC COVID-19 meeting minutes is factually accurate and well-documented through multiple independent sources including an AAT tribunal ruling [1][4].
 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 地dì dì 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 记录jì lù jì lù 享有xiǎng yǒu xiǎng yǒu 内阁nèi gé nèi gé 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn ，， ， 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 认定rèn dìng rèn dìng 该gāi gāi 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn 不能bù néng bù néng 适用shì yòng shì yòng [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
The government did systematically claim cabinet exemption for these minutes, despite legal determinations that this exemption could not apply [4].
 然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 不bù bù 完整wán zhěng wán zhěng ，， ， 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi 它tā tā 省略shěng lüè shěng lüè 了le le ：： ：
However, the claim is incomplete because it omits that: 1.
 11 1 .. . 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 继续jì xù jì xù 实行shí xíng shí xíng 完全相同wán quán xiāng tóng wán quán xiāng tóng 的de de 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì ，， ， 甚至shèn zhì shèn zhì 有所yǒu suǒ yǒu suǒ 扩大kuò dà kuò dà [[ [ 99 9 ]] ] [[ [ 1010 10 ]] ]
The Labor government has continued this exact same secrecy, arguably expanding it [9][10] 2.
 22 2 .. . 独立dú lì dú lì 仲裁庭zhòng cái tíng zhòng cái tíng 裁定cái dìng cái dìng 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 在zài zài 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 上shàng shàng 是shì shì 错误cuò wù cuò wù 的de de [[ [ 44 4 ]] ]
An independent tribunal ruled the Coalition government's position legally wrong [4] 3.
 33 3 .. . 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 违抗wéi kàng wéi kàng 仲裁庭zhòng cái tíng zhòng cái tíng 裁决cái jué cái jué [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
The government defied the tribunal ruling [5] The characterization as "corruption" is somewhat strong—this is more accurately described as "government secrecy" or "lack of transparency." While non-release of health advice documents during a pandemic raises legitimate concerns, it's not necessarily corruption (illegal personal benefit) so much as it is government overreach on confidentiality claims.
 将jiāng jiāng 其qí qí 定性dìng xìng dìng xìng 为wèi wèi "" " 腐败fǔ bài fǔ bài "" " 有些yǒu xiē yǒu xiē 过重guò zhòng guò zhòng —— — —— — 更gèng gèng 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de 描述miáo shù miáo shù 是shì shì "" " 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì "" " 或huò huò "" " 缺乏quē fá quē fá 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù "" " 。。 。
虽然suī rán suī rán 在zài zài 疫情yì qíng yì qíng 期间qī jiān qī jiān 不bù bù 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 健康jiàn kāng jiàn kāng 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 引起yǐn qǐ yǐn qǐ 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 关切guān qiè guān qiè ，， ， 但dàn dàn 这zhè zhè 不bù bù 一定yí dìng yí dìng 是shì shì 腐败fǔ bài fǔ bài （（ （ 非法fēi fǎ fēi fǎ 个人利益gè rén lì yì gè rén lì yì ）） ） ，， ， 更gèng gèng 像是xiàng shì xiàng shì 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 上shàng shàng 的de de 过度guò dù guò dù 扩张kuò zhāng kuò zhāng 。。 。

📚 来源与引用 (10)

  1. 1
    Scott Morrison's secrecy fetish exposed by release of National Cabinet papers

    Scott Morrison's secrecy fetish exposed by release of National Cabinet papers

    The Government forced to hand over the agenda and minutes of the first 20 meetings of Prime Minister Scott Morrison's National Cabinet.

    Michael West
  2. 2
    Minutes of AHPPC Meeting 03 April 2020

    Minutes of AHPPC Meeting 03 April 2020

    Dear Department of Health, I refer to the Australian Health Protection Principal Committee (AHPPC) coronavirus (COVID-19) statement on April 3, 2020: https://www.health.gov.au/news/australian-health-protection-principal-committee-ahppc-coronavirus-covid-19-statement-on-3-april-2020 “The AHPPC has been asked to consider the issue of COVID-19 in children and management of Early Childhood and Learning Centres (ECLC) in relation to the community transmission of COVID‑19.” “Emerging epidemiologic reports on COVID-19 in children show that, while they are less likely than adults to be infected and have severe illness, they are still vulnerable to the pandemic coronavirus.The Committee’s advice is that pre‑emptive closures are not proportionate or effective as a public health intervention to prevent community transmission of COVID-19 at this time.” I wish to request the following documents, under the Freedom of Information Act 1982: 1. The minutes of the meeting to produce 03 April, 2020 statement 2. Any documentation relied upon, or otherwise referenced in this meeting, to support the Committee's position and statement An agency or minister may impose a charge for providing access to a document under s 29 of the FOI Act. I request that the Department waive any charges applicable to this request, on the basis that the release of these documents would be in the public interest (s 29(5)(b)). The Committee's advice directly impacts the health of almost 25 million Australians, and the release of these documents is therefore in the interest of the entire Australian population. Yours faithfully, Tanysha B.

    Right to Know
  3. 3
    Australian Health Protection Principal Committee

    Australian Health Protection Principal Committee

    Wikipedia
  4. 4
    National Cabinet Unlocked: AAT issues Freedom of Information ruling

    National Cabinet Unlocked: AAT issues Freedom of Information ruling

    Holdingredlich
  5. 5
    wsws.org

    Australian government moves to block access to National Cabinet pandemic documents

    The government is seeking to stop any public scrutiny of the discussion inside the bipartisan body that is pushing the corporate drive to “live with the virus.”

    World Socialist Web Site
  6. 6
    Minutes, notes and agendas of National Cabinet meetings from March 2020 through August 2021

    Minutes, notes and agendas of National Cabinet meetings from March 2020 through August 2021

    I respectfully request under FOI a copy of all minutes, notes and agendas of National Cabinet meetings from March 2020 through August 2021. This request includes any minutes, notes and agendas created as part of the National Cabinet's two subcommittees, the Australian Health Protection Principal Committee (AHPPC) and the National Coordination Mechanism (NCM). Yours faithfully, Regina Jefferies

    Right to Know
  7. 7
    The government is determined to keep National Cabinet's work a secret. This should worry us all

    The government is determined to keep National Cabinet's work a secret. This should worry us all

    In an open democracy, there is no rationale for withholding information about National Cabinet’s decisions or any documents these decisions are based on.

    The Conversation
  8. 8
    Morrison government loses fight for national cabinet secrecy

    Morrison government loses fight for national cabinet secrecy

    The Morrison government has been dealt a blow with the Administrative Appeals Tribunal ruling national cabinet is not a committee of federal cabinet and therefore is not covered by cabinet confidentiality.

    The Conversation
  9. 9
    Transparency Paradox: Morrison flayed for secrecy as Albanese blocks access to government meetings

    Transparency Paradox: Morrison flayed for secrecy as Albanese blocks access to government meetings

    While the media bayonets the political corpse of Scott Morrison, Anthony Albanese has been pulling down the secrecy shutters himself

    Michael West
  10. 10
    Secretive Albanese government goes backward on transparency

    Secretive Albanese government goes backward on transparency

    “The Senate is being blocked from fulfilling its constitutional role of holding the government to account. This trend is dangerous for democracy.” – Dr Catherine Williams, Centre for Public Integrity

    The Centre for Public Integrity

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性，但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。

Previous: C0161 Next: C0163