属实

评分: 8.0/10

Coalition
C0704

声明内容

“试图引入每次看全科医生(GP)需支付7澳元费用的政策。他们声称7澳元同时足够大以起到 deterrent 作用(从而节省资金),又足够小不会阻止贫困、生病的人寻求帮助。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis

原始来源

事实核查

CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí zài zài 20142014 2014 nián nián 55 5 yuè yuè de de 预算yù suàn yù suàn zhōng zhōng 提出tí chū tí chū le le 77 7 澳元ào yuán ào yuán de de 全科quán kē quán kē 医生yī shēng yī shēng gòng gòng 付费fù fèi fù fèi yòng yòng 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The Coalition government did indeed propose a $7 GP co-payment in the May 2014 budget [1].
gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè yóu yóu 时任shí rèn shí rèn 卫生部长wèi shēng bù zhǎng wèi shēng bù zhǎng PeterPeter Peter DuttonDutton Dutton 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ TonyTony Tony AbbottAbbott Abbott 财政部长cái zhèng bù zhǎng cái zhèng bù zhǎng JoeJoe Joe HockeyHockey Hockey shì shì 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 倡导者chàng dǎo zhě chàng dǎo zhě [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The policy was announced by then-Health Minister Peter Dutton, with Prime Minister Tony Abbott and Treasurer Joe Hockey as key advocates [1].
gāi gāi 提案tí àn tí àn 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 此前cǐ qián cǐ qián 享受xiǎng shòu xiǎng shòu 全额quán é quán é 报销bào xiāo bào xiāo de de 患者huàn zhě huàn zhě cóng cóng 20152015 2015 nián nián 77 7 yuè yuè 11 1 日起rì qǐ rì qǐ wèi wèi 全科quán kē quán kē 医生yī shēng yī shēng 会诊huì zhěn huì zhěn 病理bìng lǐ bìng lǐ 影像yǐng xiàng yǐng xiàng 服务fú wù fú wù 支付zhī fù zhī fù 77 7 澳元ào yuán ào yuán [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The proposal would have required previously bulk-billed patients to pay $7 towards GP consultations, pathology, and imaging services from July 1, 2015 [1].
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 陈述chén shù chén shù de de 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu yǒu yǒu liǎng liǎng 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn (( ( 11 1 )) ) 提供tí gōng tí gōng "" " 适度shì dù shì dù de de 价格jià gé jià gé 信号xìn hào xìn hào "" " 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 他们tā men tā men 所谓suǒ wèi suǒ wèi de de "" " 六分钟liù fēn zhōng liù fēn zhōng 医疗yī liáo yī liáo "" " 不必要bù bì yào bù bì yào de de 医生yī shēng yī shēng 就诊jiù zhěn jiù zhěn (( ( 22 2 )) ) wèi wèi 医学yī xué yī xué 研究yán jiū yán jiū 未来wèi lái wèi lái 基金jī jīn jī jīn 提供tí gōng tí gōng 资金zī jīn zī jīn [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
The government's stated rationale was twofold: (1) to provide a "modest price signal" to reduce what they called "six-minute medicine" and unnecessary doctor visits, and (2) to fund the Medical Research Future Fund [2].
根据gēn jù gēn jù 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 提案tí àn tí àn 每笔měi bǐ měi bǐ 77 7 澳元ào yuán ào yuán 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng zhōng zhōng de de 55 5 澳元ào yuán ào yuán jiāng jiāng 进入jìn rù jìn rù 医学yī xué yī xué 研究yán jiū yán jiū 未来wèi lái wèi lái 基金jī jīn jī jīn ér ér 22 2 澳元ào yuán ào yuán jiāng jiāng 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 增加zēng jiā zēng jiā de de 报销bào xiāo bào xiāo é é 留在liú zài liú zài 医生yī shēng yī shēng 手中shǒu zhōng shǒu zhōng [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
Under the original proposal, $5 of each $7 fee would go to the Medical Research Future Fund, while $2 would remain with the doctor as an increased rebate [2].
声明shēng míng shēng míng zhōng zhōng duì duì 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 信息xìn xī xìn xī 传递chuán dì chuán dì de de characterizationcharacterization characterization wèi wèi 矛盾máo dùn máo dùn de de shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què de de
The claim's characterization of the government's messaging as contradictory is accurate.
CoalitionCoalition Coalition 同时tóng shí tóng shí 辩称biàn chēng biàn chēng gāi gāi 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng jiāng jiāng 起到qǐ dào qǐ dào deterrentdeterrent deterrent 作用zuò yòng zuò yòng 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo MedicareMedicare Medicare 成本chéng běn chéng běn (( ( 通过tōng guò tōng guò 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ 不必要bù bì yào bù bì yào de de 就诊jiù zhěn jiù zhěn )) ) 同时tóng shí tóng shí yòu yòu 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 足够zú gòu zú gòu modestmodest modest 不会bú huì bú huì 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ 弱势群体ruò shì qún tǐ ruò shì qún tǐ 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 医疗yī liáo yī liáo [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
The Coalition simultaneously argued that the fee would act as a deterrent to reduce Medicare costs (by discouraging unnecessary visits) while also claiming it was modest enough not to deter vulnerable people from seeking care [3].
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 明确míng què míng què 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì gāi gāi 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng 旨在zhǐ zài zhǐ zài 成为chéng wéi chéng wéi 使shǐ shǐ 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng gèng gèng 高效gāo xiào gāo xiào de de "" " 价格jià gé jià gé 信号xìn hào xìn hào "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] dàn dàn 坚称jiān chēng jiān chēng 不会bú huì bú huì 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ 人们rén men rén men 获得huò dé huò dé 必要bì yào bì yào de de 医疗yī liáo yī liáo
The government explicitly stated the fee was intended to be a "price signal" to make the system more efficient [1], but also maintained it would not prevent people from accessing necessary care.
gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 面临miàn lín miàn lín 巨大jù dà jù dà 反弹fǎn tán fǎn tán bèi bèi 多次duō cì duō cì 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng zài zài 20152015 2015 nián nián 33 3 yuè yuè bèi bèi 放弃fàng qì fàng qì [[ [ 44 4 ]] ]
The policy faced massive backlash, was modified multiple times, and was ultimately abandoned in March 2015 [4].
卫生部长wèi shēng bù zhǎng wèi shēng bù zhǎng SussanSussan Sussan LeyLey Ley 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ "" " 根本gēn běn gēn běn 不会bú huì bú huì 继续jì xù jì xù 推进tuī jìn tuī jìn "" " 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ AbbottAbbott Abbott 宣布xuān bù xuān bù "" " 已死yǐ sǐ yǐ sǐ mái mái 火化huǒ huà huǒ huà "" " [[ [ 44 4 ]] ]
Health Minister Sussan Ley announced the government would not pursue it at all, with Prime Minister Abbott declaring it "dead, buried and cremated" [4].

缺失背景

gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng 省略shěng lüè shěng lüè le le 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào de de 语境yǔ jìng yǔ jìng 信息xìn xī xìn xī
The claim omits several important pieces of context: **Exemptions were proposed.** The original policy included exemptions for children under 16 and concession card holders (low-income earners and pensioners) after their first ten visits per year [2].
** * ** * céng céng 提议tí yì tí yì 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn
A modified version announced in December 2014 would have made the co-payment "optional" for doctors, reducing the rebate by $5 instead [5]. **The Medical Research Future Fund connection.** The government explicitly linked the co-payment to establishing what would become a $20 billion Medical Research Future Fund [2].
** * ** * 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò duì duì 1616 16 suì suì 以下yǐ xià yǐ xià 儿童ér tóng ér tóng 优惠卡yōu huì kǎ yōu huì kǎ 持有者chí yǒu zhě chí yǒu zhě (( ( 低收入者dī shōu rù zhě dī shōu rù zhě 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn 领取lǐng qǔ lǐng qǔ zhě zhě )) ) de de 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn zài zài 他们tā men tā men de de qián qián 十次shí cì shí cì 就诊jiù zhěn jiù zhěn 之后zhī hòu zhī hòu [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
While this doesn't resolve the logical contradiction in the messaging, it explains the policy's structure—$5 of every $7 was earmarked for medical research rather than general budget repair [2]. **No evidence of modeling.** No government modeling was ever produced to justify the claim that a co-payment would make the system more efficient rather than just add barriers to care [2].
20142014 2014 nián nián 1212 12 yuè yuè 宣布xuān bù xuān bù de de 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi 版本bǎn běn bǎn běn jiāng jiāng 使shǐ shǐ gòng gòng 付费fù fèi fù fèi yòng yòng duì duì 医生yī shēng yī shēng 来说lái shuō lái shuō "" " xuǎn xuǎn "" " 改为gǎi wéi gǎi wéi 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 55 5 澳元ào yuán ào yuán de de 报销bào xiāo bào xiāo é é [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
The policy appeared to be based on ideology rather than evidence. **The policy was never implemented.** Despite the claim's present-tense framing, the co-payment was abandoned before taking effect.
** * ** * 医学yī xué yī xué 研究yán jiū yán jiū 未来wèi lái wèi lái 基金jī jīn jī jīn de de 关联guān lián guān lián
It existed only as a proposal from May 2014 to March 2015 [4].
** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 明确míng què míng què jiāng jiāng gòng gòng 付费fù fèi fù fèi yòng yòng 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì jiāng jiāng 成为chéng wéi chéng wéi 200200 200 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 医学yī xué yī xué 研究yán jiū yán jiū 未来wèi lái wèi lái 基金jī jīn jī jīn de de 资金zī jīn zī jīn 联系lián xì lián xì 起来qǐ lái qǐ lái [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
虽然suī rán suī rán zhè zhè 不能bù néng bù néng 解决jiě jué jiě jué 信息xìn xī xìn xī 传递chuán dì chuán dì zhōng zhōng de de 逻辑luó jí luó jí 矛盾máo dùn máo dùn dàn dàn 解释jiě shì jiě shì le le 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè de de 结构jié gòu jié gòu 每笔měi bǐ měi bǐ 77 7 澳元ào yuán ào yuán zhōng zhōng de de 55 5 澳元ào yuán ào yuán bèi bèi 指定zhǐ dìng zhǐ dìng 用于yòng yú yòng yú 医学yī xué yī xué 研究yán jiū yán jiū ér ér fēi fēi 一般yì bān yì bān 预算yù suàn yù suàn 修复xiū fù xiū fù [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
** * ** * 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu modelingmodeling modeling 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù
** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 从未cóng wèi cóng wèi 提供tí gōng tí gōng 任何rèn hé rèn hé modelingmodeling modeling lái lái 证明zhèng míng zhèng míng gòng gòng 付费fù fèi fù fèi 用会yòng huì yòng huì 使shǐ shǐ 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng gèng gèng 高效gāo xiào gāo xiào ér ér fēi fēi 仅仅jǐn jǐn jǐn jǐn 增加zēng jiā zēng jiā 就医jiù yī jiù yī 障碍zhàng ài zhàng ài [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 似乎sì hū sì hū 基于jī yú jī yú 意识形态yì shí xíng tài yì shí xíng tài ér ér fēi fēi 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù
** * ** * gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 从未cóng wèi cóng wèi 实施shí shī shí shī
** * ** * 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 声明shēng míng shēng míng 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng le le 现在xiàn zài xiàn zài 时态shí tài shí tài de de 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù dàn dàn gòng gòng 付费fù fèi fù fèi yòng yòng zài zài 生效shēng xiào shēng xiào qián qián jiù jiù bèi bèi 放弃fàng qì fàng qì le le
jǐn jǐn 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 20142014 2014 nián nián 55 5 yuè yuè zhì zhì 20152015 2015 nián nián 33 3 yuè yuè 期间qī jiān qī jiān de de 提案tí àn tí àn 存在cún zài cún zài [[ [ 44 4 ]] ]

来源可信度评估

原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò
The original sources include: - **News.com.au**: Mainstream Australian news outlet (News Corp Australia) - **Sydney Morning Herald**: Major Australian newspaper with generally balanced political coverage - **The Guardian Australia**: International outlet with center-left editorial stance These sources are generally credible mainstream media outlets.
-- - ** * ** * NewsNews News .. . comcom com .. . auau au ** * ** * 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 机构jī gòu jī gòu (( ( NewsNews News CorpCorp Corp AustraliaAustralia Australia )) )
The News.com.au article title ("Prime Minister and Treasurer don't understand their own policy") suggests critical editorial framing, which is consistent with News Corp's generally critical stance toward the Abbott government during this period.
-- - ** * ** * SydneySydney Sydney MorningMorning Morning HeraldHerald Herald ** * ** * 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 普遍pǔ biàn pǔ biàn 平衡píng héng píng héng 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 报道bào dào bào dào de de 大型dà xíng dà xíng 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 报纸bào zhǐ bào zhǐ
The SMH and Guardian articles report legitimate concerns raised by medical professionals and health advocates.
-- - ** * ** * TheThe The GuardianGuardian Guardian AustraliaAustralia Australia ** * ** * 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 中间zhōng jiān zhōng jiān 偏左piān zuǒ piān zuǒ 编辑biān jí biān jí 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng de de 国际guó jì guó jì 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ
这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 来源lái yuán lái yuán shì shì 普遍pǔ biàn pǔ biàn 可信kě xìn kě xìn de de 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 机构jī gòu jī gòu
NewsNews News .. . comcom com .. . auau au de de 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 标题biāo tí biāo tí (( ( "" " 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ 财政部长cái zhèng bù zhǎng cái zhèng bù zhǎng 理解lǐ jiě lǐ jiě 他们tā men tā men 自己zì jǐ zì jǐ de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè "" " )) ) 暗示àn shì àn shì le le 批判性pī pàn xìng pī pàn xìng de de 编辑biān jí biān jí framingframing framing zhè zhè NewsNews News CorpCorp Corp 在此期间zài cǐ qī jiān zài cǐ qī jiān duì duì AbbottAbbott Abbott 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ de de 普遍pǔ biàn pǔ biàn 批判pī pàn pī pàn 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 一致yí zhì yí zhì
SMHSMH SMH GuardianGuardian Guardian de de 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 报道bào dào bào dào le le 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 专业人士zhuān yè rén shì zhuān yè rén shì 健康jiàn kāng jiàn kāng 倡导者chàng dǎo zhě chàng dǎo zhě 提出tí chū tí chū de de 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 关切guān qiè guān qiè
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做过zuò guò zuò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng
**Did Labor do something similar?** Yes.
** * ** *
The Labor government under Prime Minister Bob Hawke proposed a $3.50 Medicare co-payment in the August 1991 budget [6].
shì shì de de
This was half the amount of the Coalition's 2014 proposal, but the fundamental policy mechanism was identical—a patient co-payment for bulk-billed GP visits.
zài zài 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ BobBob Bob HawkeHawke Hawke 领导lǐng dǎo lǐng dǎo xià xià de de 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ zài zài 19911991 1991 nián nián 88 8 yuè yuè de de 预算yù suàn yù suàn zhōng zhōng 提出tí chū tí chū le le 3.503.50 3.50 澳元ào yuán ào yuán de de MedicareMedicare Medicare gòng gòng 付费fù fèi fù fèi yòng yòng [[ [ 66 6 ]] ]
The Hawke/Howe Labor government introduced the co-payment without consultation, facing immediate backlash from the public, the Australian Medical Association (AMA), and factions within the ALP itself [6].
这是zhè shì zhè shì CoalitionCoalition Coalition 20142014 2014 nián nián 提案tí àn tí àn 金额jīn é jīn é de de 一半yí bàn yí bàn dàn dàn 基本jī běn jī běn 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 机制jī zhì jī zhì 完全相同wán quán xiāng tóng wán quán xiāng tóng duì duì 全额quán é quán é 报销bào xiāo bào xiāo de de 全科quán kē quán kē 医生yī shēng yī shēng 就诊jiù zhěn jiù zhěn 收取shōu qǔ shōu qǔ 患者huàn zhě huàn zhě gòng gòng 付费fù fèi fù fèi yòng yòng
Medicare architect Dr John Deeble called it "unjustified, ill-advised and destructive" [6].
HawkeHawke Hawke // / HoweHowe Howe 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 未经wèi jīng wèi jīng 协商xié shāng xié shāng jiù jiù 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù le le gòng gòng 付费fù fèi fù fèi yòng yòng 立即lì jí lì jí 面临miàn lín miàn lín 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 医学yī xué yī xué 协会xié huì xié huì (( ( AMAAMA AMA )) ) 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí ALPALP ALP 内部nèi bù nèi bù 派系pài xì pài xì de de 强烈qiáng liè qiáng liè 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì [[ [ 66 6 ]] ]
The ACTU opposed it, stating it was "not convinced that the [$3.50] co-payment proposal necessarily solves the problem of overservicing" [6].
MedicareMedicare Medicare 架构师jià gòu shī jià gòu shī JohnJohn John DeebleDeeble Deeble 博士bó shì bó shì 称其为chēng qí wèi chēng qí wèi "" " 正当zhèng dāng zhèng dāng 不明智bù míng zhì bù míng zhì qiě qiě 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 破坏性pò huài xìng pò huài xìng de de "" " [[ [ 66 6 ]] ]
The controversy was so damaging that it "arguably cost prime minister Bob Hawke the Labor leadership" [6].
ACTUACTU ACTU 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì "" " 相信xiāng xìn xiāng xìn [[ [ 3.503.50 3.50 澳元ào yuán ào yuán ]] ] gòng gòng 付费fù fèi fù fèi yòng yòng 提案tí àn tí àn 必然bì rán bì rán néng néng 解决jiě jué jiě jué 过度guò dù guò dù 服务fú wù fú wù de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí "" " [[ [ 66 6 ]] ]
The policy was suspended, modified to a reduced $2.50 charge as a face-saver, and ultimately abolished by March 1992 after Paul Keating ousted Hawke as leader [6]. **Comparison:** Both parties have attempted GP co-payments while in government.
这场zhè chǎng zhè chǎng 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì 极具jí jù jí jù 破坏性pò huài xìng pò huài xìng "" " 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ shuō shuō 使shǐ shǐ 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ BobBob Bob HawkeHawke Hawke 失去shī qù shī qù le le 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 领袖lǐng xiù lǐng xiù 职位zhí wèi zhí wèi "" " [[ [ 66 6 ]] ]
The Labor proposal ($3.50, later $2.50) was smaller than the Coalition's ($7), but both faced similar opposition from medical professionals, welfare groups, and the public.
gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè bèi bèi 暂停zàn tíng zàn tíng 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi wèi wèi 降低jiàng dī jiàng dī zhì zhì 2.502.50 2.50 澳元ào yuán ào yuán de de 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng 保全bǎo quán bǎo quán 颜面yán miàn yán miàn 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng zài zài PaulPaul Paul KeatingKeating Keating 19921992 1992 nián nián 33 3 yuè yuè 取代qǔ dài qǔ dài HawkeHawke Hawke 成为chéng wéi chéng wéi 领袖lǐng xiù lǐng xiù hòu hòu bèi bèi 废除fèi chú fèi chú [[ [ 66 6 ]] ]
Both were ultimately abandoned due to political backlash.
** * ** * 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào ** * ** * 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng zài zài 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 期间qī jiān qī jiān dōu dōu 尝试cháng shì cháng shì guò guò 全科quán kē quán kē 医生yī shēng yī shēng gòng gòng 付费fù fèi fù fèi yòng yòng
The key difference is that Labor's attempt was in 1991, while the Coalition's was in 2014—over two decades later, with significantly higher healthcare costs and greater public expectation of universal access.
工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng de de 提案tí àn tí àn (( ( 3.503.50 3.50 澳元ào yuán ào yuán hòu hòu 改为gǎi wéi gǎi wéi 2.502.50 2.50 澳元ào yuán ào yuán )) ) CoalitionCoalition Coalition de de (( ( 77 7 澳元ào yuán ào yuán )) ) 金额jīn é jīn é xiǎo xiǎo dàn dàn 两者liǎng zhě liǎng zhě dōu dōu 面临miàn lín miàn lín 来自lái zì lái zì 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 专业人士zhuān yè rén shì zhuān yè rén shì 福利fú lì fú lì 团体tuán tǐ tuán tǐ 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng de de 类似lèi sì lèi sì 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì
两者liǎng zhě liǎng zhě 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng dōu dōu yīn yīn 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 反弹fǎn tán fǎn tán ér ér bèi bèi 放弃fàng qì fàng qì
关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 区别qū bié qū bié 在于zài yú zài yú 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng de de 尝试cháng shì cháng shì shì shì zài zài 19911991 1991 nián nián ér ér CoalitionCoalition Coalition de de shì shì zài zài 20142014 2014 nián nián 二十多年èr shí duō nián èr shí duō nián hòu hòu 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 成本chéng běn chéng běn 显著xiǎn zhù xiǎn zhù 提高tí gāo tí gāo 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng duì duì 普遍pǔ biàn pǔ biàn 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 服务fú wù fú wù de de 期望qī wàng qī wàng gèng gèng gāo gāo
🌐

平衡视角

gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng 正确zhèng què zhèng què 识别shí bié shí bié le le 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 信息xìn xī xìn xī 传递chuán dì chuán dì zhōng zhōng de de 一个yí gè yí gè 逻辑luó jí luó jí 矛盾máo dùn máo dùn 一笔yī bǐ yī bǐ 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng 不能bù néng bù néng 同时tóng shí tóng shí 足够zú gòu zú gòu 大以dà yǐ dà yǐ 起到qǐ dào qǐ dào deterrentdeterrent deterrent 作用zuò yòng zuò yòng (( ( 改变gǎi biàn gǎi biàn 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi 节省jié shěng jié shěng 资金zī jīn zī jīn )) ) yòu yòu 足够zú gòu zú gòu xiǎo xiǎo 不会bú huì bú huì 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ 任何人rèn hé rén rèn hé rén (( ( 特别tè bié tè bié shì shì 需要xū yào xū yào 医疗yī liáo yī liáo de de 弱势群体ruò shì qún tǐ ruò shì qún tǐ )) ) [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
The claim correctly identifies a logical contradiction in the government's messaging: a fee cannot simultaneously be large enough to act as a deterrent (changing behavior to save money) and small enough not to deter anyone (particularly vulnerable people who need care) [3].
这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 矛盾máo dùn máo dùn zài zài 当时dāng shí dāng shí bèi bèi 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 批评者pī píng zhě pī píng zhě 注意zhù yì zhù yì dào dào
This contradiction was widely noted by critics at the time.
然而rán ér rán ér gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng zhǐ zhǐ 呈现chéng xiàn chéng xiàn le le 负面fù miàn fù miàn framingframing framing ér ér 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn
However, the claim presents only the negative framing without acknowledging: 1. **The policy rationale:** The government argued that a "price signal" was necessary to address what they called "six-minute medicine" and to make Medicare sustainable [1].
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu ** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 辩称biàn chēng biàn chēng "" " 价格jià gé jià gé 信号xìn hào xìn hào "" " shì shì 必要bì yào bì yào de de 解决jiě jué jiě jué 他们tā men tā men 所谓suǒ wèi suǒ wèi de de "" " 六分钟liù fēn zhōng liù fēn zhōng 医疗yī liáo yī liáo "" " 问题wèn tí wèn tí bìng bìng 使shǐ shǐ MedicareMedicare Medicare 持续chí xù chí xù 发展fā zhǎn fā zhǎn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
While experts disputed this rationale [2], it was the stated justification. 2. **The research funding connection:** The $7 fee was partially designed to fund the Medical Research Future Fund [2], not purely as a budget cut. 3. **Precedent exists across parties:** As noted above, Labor had attempted a similar policy in 1991 [6].
虽然suī rán suī rán 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā duì duì zhè zhè 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 提出异议tí chū yì yì tí chū yì yì [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] dàn dàn zhè zhè shì shì 陈述chén shù chén shù de de 正当理由zhèng dāng lǐ yóu zhèng dāng lǐ yóu
GP co-payments are not unique to Coalition ideology—they have been proposed by both major parties when facing budget pressures. 4. **The policy was abandoned:** The government ultimately listened to overwhelming opposition from doctors, patients, and the Senate, and scrapped the proposal entirely [4]. **Key context:** The logical contradiction identified in the claim is valid and was widely recognized.
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 研究yán jiū yán jiū 资金zī jīn zī jīn 关联guān lián guān lián ** * ** * 77 7 澳元ào yuán ào yuán 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng 部分bù fèn bù fèn shì shì 为了wèi le wèi le 资助zī zhù zī zhù 医学yī xué yī xué 研究yán jiū yán jiū 未来wèi lái wèi lái 基金jī jīn jī jīn [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] ér ér fēi fēi 纯粹chún cuì chún cuì 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 预算yù suàn yù suàn 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn
However, this type of contradictory messaging about cost-saving measures is common in politics across the spectrum.
33 3 .. . ** * ** * kuà kuà 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 先例xiān lì xiān lì ** * ** * 如上所述rú shàng suǒ shù rú shàng suǒ shù 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng zài zài 19911991 1991 nián nián 尝试cháng shì cháng shì guò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè [[ [ 66 6 ]] ]
The claim is factually accurate but lacks context about the policy's research funding purpose and the historical precedent of Labor's similar attempt.
全科quán kē quán kē 医生yī shēng yī shēng gòng gòng 付费fù fèi fù fèi yòng yòng 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 意识形态yì shí xíng tài yì shí xíng tài suǒ suǒ 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu 它们tā men tā men zài zài 两大liǎng dà liǎng dà 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 面临miàn lín miàn lín 预算yù suàn yù suàn 压力yā lì yā lì shí shí dōu dōu bèi bèi 提出tí chū tí chū guò guò
44 4 .. . ** * ** * 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè bèi bèi 放弃fàng qì fàng qì ** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 听取tīng qǔ tīng qǔ le le 医生yī shēng yī shēng 患者huàn zhě huàn zhě 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn de de 压倒性yā dǎo xìng yā dǎo xìng 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 意见yì jiàn yì jiàn 完全wán quán wán quán 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo le le gāi gāi 提案tí àn tí àn [[ [ 44 4 ]] ]
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 语境yǔ jìng yǔ jìng ** * ** * 声明shēng míng shēng míng zhōng zhōng 识别shí bié shí bié chū chū de de 逻辑luó jí luó jí 矛盾máo dùn máo dùn shì shì 有效yǒu xiào yǒu xiào de de bìng bìng bèi bèi 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 认可rèn kě rèn kě
然而rán ér rán ér 这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 关于guān yú guān yú 节省成本jié shěng chéng běn jié shěng chéng běn 措施cuò shī cuò shī de de 矛盾máo dùn máo dùn 信息xìn xī xìn xī zài zài 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì zhōng zhōng acrossacross across thethe the spectrumspectrum spectrum dōu dōu hěn hěn 常见cháng jiàn cháng jiàn
gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng zài zài 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què dàn dàn 缺乏quē fá quē fá 关于guān yú guān yú 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 研究yán jiū yán jiū 资金zī jīn zī jīn 目的mù dì mù dì 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 类似lèi sì lèi sì 尝试cháng shì cháng shì 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ 先例xiān lì xiān lì de de 语境yǔ jìng yǔ jìng

属实

8.0

/ 10

gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng zài zài 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què
The claim is factually accurate.
CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí zài zài 20142014 2014 nián nián 预算yù suàn yù suàn zhōng zhōng 提出tí chū tí chū le le 77 7 澳元ào yuán ào yuán 全科quán kē quán kē 医生yī shēng yī shēng gòng gòng 付费fù fèi fù fèi yòng yòng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng men men 确实què shí què shí 同时tóng shí tóng shí 辩称biàn chēng biàn chēng gāi gāi 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng jiāng jiāng 起到qǐ dào qǐ dào deterrentdeterrent deterrent 作用zuò yòng zuò yòng 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 不必要bù bì yào bù bì yào de de 就诊jiù zhěn jiù zhěn 同时tóng shí tóng shí yòu yòu 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 足够zú gòu zú gòu modestmodest modest 不会bú huì bú huì 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ 弱势群体ruò shì qún tǐ ruò shì qún tǐ 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 医疗yī liáo yī liáo [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
The Coalition government did propose a $7 GP co-payment in the 2014 budget [1], and government ministers did simultaneously argue that the fee would act as a deterrent to reduce unnecessary visits while also claiming it was modest enough not to deter vulnerable people from seeking care [3].
zhè zhè 确实què shí què shí shì shì 一个yí gè yí gè 逻辑luó jí luó jí 矛盾máo dùn máo dùn 不能bù néng bù néng 拥有yōng yǒu yōng yǒu 一个yí gè yí gè 不会bú huì bú huì deterrentdeterrent deterrent de de deterrentdeterrent deterrent
This is indeed a logical contradiction—you cannot have a deterrent that doesn't deter.
gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 从未cóng wèi cóng wèi 实施shí shī shí shī bèi bèi 多次duō cì duō cì 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi 试图shì tú shì tú 使shǐ shǐ 在政治上zài zhèng zhì shàng zài zhèng zhì shàng yǒu yǒu 可行性kě xíng xìng kě xíng xìng 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng zài zài 20152015 2015 nián nián 33 3 yuè yuè bèi bèi 完全wán quán wán quán 放弃fàng qì fàng qì [[ [ 44 4 ]] ]
The policy was never implemented, was modified multiple times in attempts to make it politically viable, and was ultimately abandoned in March 2015 [4].
duì duì 矛盾máo dùn máo dùn 信息xìn xī xìn xī 传递chuán dì chuán dì de de 批评pī píng pī píng shì shì 有效yǒu xiào yǒu xiào de de bìng bìng zài zài 当时dāng shí dāng shí bèi bèi 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 评论员píng lùn yuán píng lùn yuán 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 注意zhù yì zhù yì dào dào
The criticism of contradictory messaging is valid and was widely noted by commentators and medical experts at the time.

📚 来源与引用 (6)

  1. 1
    abc.net.au

    abc.net.au

    As the Government confirms the scrapping of the GP co-payment, look back at the policy's rise and fall.

    Abc Net
  2. 2
    theconversation.com

    theconversation.com

    In the government’s latest “scraping away the barnacles” of unpopular and blocked policies, prime minister Tony Abbott and health minister Peter Dutton have announced they’re abandoning the plan to have…

    The Conversation
  3. 3
    web.archive.org

    web.archive.org

    EMBARRASSING bloopers by Prime Minister Tony Abbott and Treasurer Joe Hockey have revealed they don’t understand who will be forced to pay their controversial new $7 GP fee.

    NewsComAu
  4. 4
    smh.com.au

    smh.com.au

    The Abbott government's GP co-payment has been killed off for good with Heath Minister Sussan Ley telling Coalition MPs "we are not pursuing it at all".

    The Sydney Morning Herald
  5. 5
    smh.com.au

    smh.com.au

    Unnecessary deaths, increased illness and a blowout in doctors' fees would be the outcome of the government’s proposal to introduce a GP co-payment, medical practitioners have said.

    The Sydney Morning Herald
  6. 6
    smh.com.au

    smh.com.au

    The announcement of a $3.50 co-payment for people who were bulk-billed under Medicare in the August 1991 budget arguably cost prime minister Bob Hawke the Labor leadership.

    The Sydney Morning Herald

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。