部分属实

评分: 6.0/10

Coalition
C0697

声明内容

“拒绝就美国无人机袭击导致2名澳大利亚人死亡一事发表评论。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

** * ** * 属实shǔ shí shǔ shí ** * ** * —— — 阿博特ā bó tè ā bó tè 领导lǐng dǎo lǐng dǎo 的de de CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ (( ( 20132013 2013 -- - 20152015 2015 年nián nián )) ) 确实què shí què shí 拒绝jù jué jù jué 就jiù jiù 20132013 2013 年nián nián 1111 11 月yuè yuè 两名liǎng míng liǎng míng 澳大利亚人ào dà lì yà rén ào dà lì yà rén 在zài zài 美国měi guó měi guó 也门yě mén yě mén 无人机wú rén jī wú rén jī 袭击xí jī xí jī 中zhōng zhōng 死亡sǐ wáng sǐ wáng 的de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 发表fā biǎo fā biǎo 除chú chú 基本jī běn jī běn 确认què rèn què rèn 之外zhī wài zhī wài 的de de 任何rèn hé rèn hé 评论píng lùn píng lùn 。。 。
**TRUE** - The Abbott Coalition Government (2013-2015) did indeed refuse to comment beyond basic confirmation regarding the circumstances of two Australians killed in a US drone strike in Yemen in November 2013.
被bèi bèi 击毙jī bì jī bì 的de de 两名liǎng míng liǎng míng 澳大利亚人ào dà lì yà rén ào dà lì yà rén 是shì shì :: :
The two Australians killed were: - **Christopher Harvard** (also known as Abu Salma al Australi), a Townsville man who had travelled to Yemen in 2011 to teach English [1] - **Darryl Jones** (also known as Muslim bin John or Abu Suhaib al Australi), a dual Australian-New Zealand citizen [1] Both men were reportedly fighting with al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) and were killed in a US Predator drone strike on a convoy in Yemen's Hadramout province in November 2013 [1][2].
-- - ** * ** * ChristopherChristopher Christopher HarvardHarvard Harvard ** * ** * (( ( 又名yòu míng yòu míng AbuAbu Abu SalmaSalma Salma alal al AustraliAustrali Australi )) ) ,, , 一名yī míng yī míng 汤斯维尔tāng sī wéi ěr tāng sī wéi ěr 男子nán zi nán zi ,, , 于yú yú 20112011 2011 年nián nián 前往qián wǎng qián wǎng 也门yě mén yě mén 教授jiào shòu jiào shòu 英语yīng yǔ yīng yǔ [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
Their deaths were confirmed by the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT), which stated the men were "killed during counter-terrorism operations" but otherwise "refused to discuss the details of the deaths" [2].
-- - ** * ** * DarrylDarryl Darryl JonesJones Jones ** * ** * (( ( 又名yòu míng yòu míng MuslimMuslim Muslim binbin bin JohnJohn John 或huò huò AbuAbu Abu SuhaibSuhaib Suhaib alal al AustraliAustrali Australi )) ) ,, , 拥有yōng yǒu yōng yǒu 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà -- - 新西兰xīn xī lán xīn xī lán 双重国籍shuāng chóng guó jí shuāng chóng guó jí [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The US embassy similarly "refused to comment on the incident" while asserting "the lawfulness of any work done to mitigate threats the US faces" [2].
据jù jù 报道bào dào bào dào ,, , 两人liǎng rén liǎng rén 当时dāng shí dāng shí 正在zhèng zài zhèng zài 与yǔ yǔ 基地jī dì jī dì 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 阿拉伯半岛ā lā bó bàn dǎo ā lā bó bàn dǎo 分支fēn zhī fēn zhī (( ( AQAPAQAP AQAP )) ) 并肩作战bìng jiān zuò zhàn bìng jiān zuò zhàn ,, , 并于bìng yú bìng yú 20132013 2013 年nián nián 1111 11 月yuè yuè 在zài zài 也门yě mén yě mén 哈德拉毛hā dé lā máo hā dé lā máo 省shěng shěng 的de de 一次yī cì yī cì 美国měi guó měi guó 捕食者bǔ shí zhě bǔ shí zhě 无人机wú rén jī wú rén jī 对duì duì 车队chē duì chē duì 的de de 袭击xí jī xí jī 中zhōng zhōng 丧生sàng shēng sàng shēng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The incident became public knowledge in April 2014 when AQAP published photos of the two men, and the story was reported in Australian media [1].
澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 外交wài jiāo wài jiāo 贸易部mào yì bù mào yì bù (( ( DFATDFAT DFAT )) ) 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí 了le le 他们tā men tā men 的de de 死亡sǐ wáng sǐ wáng ,, , 称chēng chēng 这zhè zhè 两名liǎng míng liǎng míng 男子nán zi nán zi "" " 在zài zài 反恐fǎn kǒng fǎn kǒng 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 中zhōng zhōng 丧生sàng shēng sàng shēng "" " ,, , 但dàn dàn 除此之外chú cǐ zhī wài chú cǐ zhī wài "" " 拒绝jù jué jù jué 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn 死亡sǐ wáng sǐ wáng 细节xì jié xì jié "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
美国大使馆měi guó dà shǐ guǎn měi guó dà shǐ guǎn 同样tóng yàng tóng yàng "" " 拒绝jù jué jù jué 就jiù jiù 此事cǐ shì cǐ shì 发表fā biǎo fā biǎo 评论píng lùn píng lùn "" " ,, , 同时tóng shí tóng shí 坚称jiān chēng jiān chēng "" " 美国měi guó měi guó 为wèi wèi 减轻jiǎn qīng jiǎn qīng 所suǒ suǒ 面临miàn lín miàn lín 的de de 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 而ér ér 开展kāi zhǎn kāi zhǎn 的de de 任何rèn hé rèn hé 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 都dōu dōu 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 合法性hé fǎ xìng hé fǎ xìng "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
这一zhè yī zhè yī 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn 于yú yú 20142014 2014 年nián nián 44 4 月yuè yuè 成为chéng wéi chéng wéi 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng 知晓zhī xiǎo zhī xiǎo 的de de 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn ,, , 当时dāng shí dāng shí AQAPAQAP AQAP 公布gōng bù gōng bù 了le le 两人liǎng rén liǎng rén 的de de 照片zhào piān zhào piān ,, , 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 对此duì cǐ duì cǐ 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 了le le 报道bào dào bào dào [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。

缺失背景

** * ** * 被bèi bèi 击毙jī bì jī bì 人员rén yuán rén yuán 是shì shì 战斗人员zhàn dòu rén yuán zhàn dòu rén yuán ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 平民píng mín píng mín 。。 。
**The individuals were combatants, not civilians.** The claim frames the incident in a way that could suggest innocent Australians were killed.
** * ** * 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 的de de 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 方式fāng shì fāng shì 可能kě néng kě néng 暗示àn shì àn shì 无辜wú gū wú gū 的de de 澳大利亚人ào dà lì yà rén ào dà lì yà rén 被bèi bèi 杀害shā hài shā hài 。。 。
However, both men were reportedly fighting with al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), a designated terrorist organization [1][3].
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 据jù jù 报道bào dào bào dào ,, , 这zhè zhè 两名liǎng míng liǎng míng 男子nán zi nán zi 当时dāng shí dāng shí 正在zhèng zài zhèng zài 与yǔ yǔ 基地jī dì jī dì 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 阿拉伯半岛ā lā bó bàn dǎo ā lā bó bàn dǎo 分支fēn zhī fēn zhī (( ( AQAPAQAP AQAP )) ) —— — —— — 一个yí gè yí gè 被bèi bèi 指定zhǐ dìng zhǐ dìng 的de de 恐怖组织kǒng bù zǔ zhī kǒng bù zǔ zhī —— — —— — 并肩作战bìng jiān zuò zhàn bìng jiān zuò zhàn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
According to ABC reports citing documents obtained under Freedom of Information, "it is thought the two men were involved in the capture and ransom of Europeans at the time" [1]. **Standard government practice on intelligence matters.** The Australian government has maintained a long-standing bipartisan policy of not commenting on intelligence operations, particularly those involving the joint US-Australia Pine Gap facility in the Northern Territory [2].
根据gēn jù gēn jù ABCABC ABC 报道bào dào bào dào 援引yuán yǐn yuán yǐn 的de de 信息xìn xī xìn xī 自由zì yóu zì yóu 法fǎ fǎ 获得huò dé huò dé 的de de 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn ,, , "" " 据信jù xìn jù xìn 这zhè zhè 两名liǎng míng liǎng míng 男子nán zi nán zi 当时dāng shí dāng shí 参与cān yù cān yù 了le le 欧洲人ōu zhōu rén ōu zhōu rén 的de de 绑架bǎng jià bǎng jià 和hé hé 勒索lè suǒ lè suǒ 活动huó dòng huó dòng "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
Pine Gap, established in 1970, is a signals intelligence base that both Australian and US officials acknowledge plays a role in intelligence sharing, though its specific functions remain classified [2]. **Limited information was provided.** While the government refused to discuss operational details, DFAT did confirm the deaths and the general circumstances (counter-terrorism operations) [2].
** * ** * 情报qíng bào qíng bào 事务shì wù shì wù 的de de 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ 。。 。
The "refusal to comment" was about specific operational details and intelligence involvement, not about acknowledging the deaths themselves. **Australia's role in Five Eyes alliance.** Australia is part of the Five Eyes intelligence alliance (US, UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand), which involves extensive intelligence sharing between partner nations [4].
** * ** * 澳大利亚政府ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ 长期以来cháng qī yǐ lái cháng qī yǐ lái 坚持jiān chí jiān chí 不bù bù 对duì duì 情报qíng bào qíng bào 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 发表fā biǎo fā biǎo 评论píng lùn píng lùn 的de de 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè ,, , 特别tè bié tè bié 是shì shì 涉及shè jí shè jí 美澳měi ào měi ào 联合lián hé lián hé PinePine Pine GapGap Gap 设施shè shī shè shī 的de de 情报qíng bào qíng bào 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
Both major Australian political parties have consistently supported this alliance and the Pine Gap facility since its establishment [2].
PinePine Pine GapGap Gap 设施shè shī shè shī 成立chéng lì chéng lì 于yú yú 19701970 1970 年nián nián ,, , 是shì shì 一个yí gè yí gè 信号情报xìn hào qíng bào xìn hào qíng bào 基地jī dì jī dì ,, , 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 和hé hé 美国měi guó měi guó 官员guān yuán guān yuán 均jūn jūn 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn 该gāi gāi 设施shè shī shè shī 在zài zài 情报qíng bào qíng bào 共享gòng xiǎng gòng xiǎng 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 发挥作用fā huī zuò yòng fā huī zuò yòng ,, , 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 其qí qí 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 职能zhí néng zhí néng 仍属réng shǔ réng shǔ 机密jī mì jī mì [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 提供tí gōng tí gōng 了le le 有限yǒu xiàn yǒu xiàn 信息xìn xī xìn xī 。。 。
** * ** * 虽然suī rán suī rán 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 拒绝jù jué jù jué 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 细节xì jié xì jié ,, , 但dàn dàn 外交wài jiāo wài jiāo 贸易部mào yì bù mào yì bù 确实què shí què shí 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí 了le le 死亡sǐ wáng sǐ wáng 事实shì shí shì shí 和hé hé 大致dà zhì dà zhì 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng (( ( 反恐fǎn kǒng fǎn kǒng 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng )) ) [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
"" " 拒绝jù jué jù jué 发表fā biǎo fā biǎo 评论píng lùn píng lùn "" " 是shì shì 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 细节xì jié xì jié 和hé hé 情报qíng bào qíng bào 参与cān yù cān yù ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn 死亡sǐ wáng sǐ wáng 事实shì shí shì shí 本身běn shēn běn shēn 。。 。
** * ** * 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 在zài zài 五眼wǔ yǎn wǔ yǎn 联盟lián méng lián méng 中zhōng zhōng 的de de 角色jué sè jué sè 。。 。
** * ** * 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 是shì shì 五眼wǔ yǎn wǔ yǎn 情报qíng bào qíng bào 联盟lián méng lián méng (( ( 美国měi guó měi guó 、、 、 英国yīng guó yīng guó 、、 、 加拿大jiā ná dà jiā ná dà 、、 、 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 、、 、 新西兰xīn xī lán xīn xī lán )) ) 的de de 成员chéng yuán chéng yuán ,, , 该gāi gāi 联盟lián méng lián méng 涉及shè jí shè jí 伙伴huǒ bàn huǒ bàn 国家guó jiā guó jiā 之间zhī jiān zhī jiān 的de de 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 情报qíng bào qíng bào 共享gòng xiǎng gòng xiǎng [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
自该zì gāi zì gāi 设施shè shī shè shī 成立chéng lì chéng lì 以来yǐ lái yǐ lái ,, , 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 两大liǎng dà liǎng dà 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 都dōu dōu 始终shǐ zhōng shǐ zhōng 支持zhī chí zhī chí 这一zhè yī zhè yī 联盟lián méng lián méng 和hé hé PinePine Pine GapGap Gap 设施shè shī shè shī [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。

来源可信度评估

原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 消息来源xiāo xī lái yuán xiāo xī lái yuán ** * ** * ScottScott Scott LudlamLudlam Ludlam ** * ** * (( ( 绿党lǜ dǎng lǜ dǎng 议员yì yuán yì yuán )) ) 是shì shì 一位yī wèi yī wèi 可信kě xìn kě xìn 但dàn dàn ** * ** * 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 性xìng xìng 的de de 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 人物rén wù rén wù ** * ** * 。。 。
The original source, **Scott Ludlam** (Greens MP), is a credible but **partisan political figure**.
与yǔ yǔ 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 相比xiāng bǐ xiāng bǐ ,, , 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 绿党lǜ dǎng lǜ dǎng 历来lì lái lì lái 对美澳duì měi ào duì měi ào 联盟lián méng lián méng 和hé hé 军事行动jūn shì xíng dòng jūn shì xíng dòng 持chí chí 更gèng gèng 批评pī píng pī píng 的de de 态度tài dù tài dù [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The Australian Greens have historically been more critical of the US-Australia alliance and military operations compared to the major parties [2].
虽然suī rán suī rán LudlamLudlam Ludlam 关于guān yú guān yú 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 拒绝jù jué jù jué 发表fā biǎo fā biǎo 评论píng lùn píng lùn 的de de 事实性shì shí xìng shì shí xìng 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 是shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de ,, , 但dàn dàn 其qí qí 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 忽略hū lüè hū lüè 了le le 以下yǐ xià yǐ xià 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng :: :
While Ludlam's factual claim about the government's refusal to comment is accurate, the framing omits important context about: - The nature of the individuals killed (AQAP combatants vs. civilians) - The bipartisan nature of intelligence policy in Australia - The fact that the government did confirm the deaths, just not operational details The Greens' political stance includes skepticism toward the Five Eyes alliance and Pine Gap, which should be considered when evaluating the framing of this claim [2].
-- - 被bèi bèi 击毙jī bì jī bì 人员rén yuán rén yuán 的de de 性质xìng zhì xìng zhì (( ( AQAPAQAP AQAP 战斗人员zhàn dòu rén yuán zhàn dòu rén yuán vsvs vs 平民píng mín píng mín )) )
-- - 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 情报qíng bào qíng bào 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 的de de 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 性质xìng zhì xìng zhì
-- - 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí 了le le 死亡sǐ wáng sǐ wáng 事实shì shí shì shí ,, , 只是zhǐ shì zhǐ shì 未wèi wèi 透露tòu lù tòu lù 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 细节xì jié xì jié
绿党lǜ dǎng lǜ dǎng 的de de 政治立场zhèng zhì lì chǎng zhèng zhì lì chǎng 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 对duì duì 五眼wǔ yǎn wǔ yǎn 联盟lián méng lián méng 和hé hé PinePine Pine GapGap Gap 的de de 质疑zhì yí zhì yí ,, , 这zhè zhè 在zài zài 评估píng gū píng gū 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 的de de 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 方式fāng shì fāng shì 时应shí yīng shí yīng 予以考虑yǔ yǐ kǎo lǜ yǔ yǐ kǎo lǜ [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 也yě yě 曾céng céng 采取cǎi qǔ cǎi qǔ 类似lèi sì lèi sì 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ ?? ?
**Did Labor do something similar?** Search conducted: "Labor government Australian citizens killed overseas military drone policy" **Finding:** The Rudd and Gillard Labor governments (2007-2013) maintained the **same policies** regarding intelligence cooperation and Pine Gap operations.
** * ** *
The Five Eyes alliance and Pine Gap facility have received bipartisan support from both Labor and Coalition governments since 1970 [2].
搜索sōu suǒ sōu suǒ 关键词guān jiàn cí guān jiàn cí :: : "" " LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 公民gōng mín gōng mín 海外hǎi wài hǎi wài 死亡sǐ wáng sǐ wáng 军事jūn shì jūn shì 无人机wú rén jī wú rén jī 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè "" "
Former Labor Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser (who held office when Pine Gap was established in 1970) later became critical of the facility, stating that "the fundamental nature of the joint facility has changed over time" from intelligence collection to "targeting weapons systems" and drone targeting [2].
** * ** * 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn :: : ** * ** * 陆克文lù kè wén lù kè wén 和hé hé 吉拉德jí lā dé jí lā dé 领导lǐng dǎo lǐng dǎo 的de de LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ (( ( 20072007 2007 -- - 20132013 2013 年nián nián )) ) 在zài zài 情报qíng bào qíng bào 合作hé zuò hé zuò 和hé hé PinePine Pine GapGap Gap 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 维持wéi chí wéi chí 了le le ** * ** * 相同xiāng tóng xiāng tóng 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè ** * ** * 。。 。
However, successive Labor governments (Rudd/Gillard) continued the facility's operations without significant policy changes.
自zì zì 19701970 1970 年nián nián 以来yǐ lái yǐ lái ,, , 五眼wǔ yǎn wǔ yǎn 联盟lián méng lián méng 和hé hé PinePine Pine GapGap Gap 设施shè shī shè shī 获得huò dé huò dé 了le le LaborLabor Labor 和hé hé CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 支持zhī chí zhī chí [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The policy of not commenting on US military operations involving Australian intelligence support has been consistent across governments of both persuasions.
前qián qián LaborLabor Labor 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ 马尔科mǎ ěr kē mǎ ěr kē 姆mǔ mǔ ·· · 弗雷泽fú léi zé fú léi zé (( ( PinePine Pine GapGap Gap 于yú yú 19701970 1970 年nián nián 成立chéng lì chéng lì 时shí shí 他tā tā 在zài zài 任rèn rèn )) ) 后来hòu lái hòu lái 对duì duì 该gāi gāi 设施shè shī shè shī 提出批评tí chū pī píng tí chū pī píng ,, , 称chēng chēng "" " 联合lián hé lián hé 设施shè shī shè shī 的de de 根本gēn běn gēn běn 性质xìng zhì xìng zhì 已yǐ yǐ 随suí suí 时间shí jiān shí jiān 发生变化fā shēng biàn huà fā shēng biàn huà "" " ,, , 从cóng cóng 情报qíng bào qíng bào 收集shōu jí shōu jí 变为biàn wèi biàn wèi "" " 瞄准miáo zhǔn miáo zhǔn 武器wǔ qì wǔ qì 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng "" " 和hé hé 无人机wú rén jī wú rén jī 瞄准miáo zhǔn miáo zhǔn [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
This is standard practice for intelligence matters involving allies, not a unique position taken by the Coalition.
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 继任jì rèn jì rèn 的de de LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ (( ( 陆克文lù kè wén lù kè wén // / 吉拉德jí lā dé jí lā dé )) ) 继续jì xù jì xù 运营yùn yíng yùn yíng 该gāi gāi 设施shè shī shè shī ,, , 未wèi wèi 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 调整tiáo zhěng tiáo zhěng 。。 。
不bù bù 对duì duì 涉及shè jí shè jí 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 情报qíng bào qíng bào 支持zhī chí zhī chí 的de de 美国měi guó měi guó 军事行动jūn shì xíng dòng jūn shì xíng dòng 发表fā biǎo fā biǎo 评论píng lùn píng lùn 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè ,, , 在zài zài 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 中zhōng zhōng 都dōu dōu 是shì shì 一致yí zhì yí zhì 的de de 。。 。
这是zhè shì zhè shì 涉及shè jí shè jí 盟友méng yǒu méng yǒu 的de de 情报qíng bào qíng bào 事务shì wù shì wù 的de de 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu 的de de 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng :: : ** * ** * CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 遵循zūn xún zūn xún 情报qíng bào qíng bào 事务shì wù shì wù 的de de 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ ,, , 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí 了le le 两名liǎng míng liǎng míng 澳大利亚人ào dà lì yà rén ào dà lì yà rén 的de de 死亡sǐ wáng sǐ wáng ,, , 但dàn dàn 拒绝jù jué jù jué 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 细节xì jié xì jié 或huò huò 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 可能kě néng kě néng 通过tōng guò tōng guò PinePine Pine GapGap Gap 情报qíng bào qíng bào 共享gòng xiǎng gòng xiǎng 参与cān yù cān yù 的de de 潜在qián zài qián zài 角色jué sè jué sè [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
**The government's position:** The Coalition Government, following standard practice for intelligence matters, confirmed the deaths of the two Australians but declined to discuss operational details or Australia's potential involvement through intelligence sharing at Pine Gap [2].
这zhè zhè 符合fú hé fú hé 关于guān yú guān yú 情报qíng bào qíng bào 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 和hé hé 五眼wǔ yǎn wǔ yǎn 联盟lián méng lián méng 的de de 长期cháng qī cháng qī 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè ,, , 该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 由yóu yóu LaborLabor Labor 和hé hé CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 共同gòng tóng gòng tóng 维持wéi chí wéi chí 。。 。
This aligns with long-standing government policy regarding intelligence operations and the Five Eyes alliance, maintained by both Labor and Coalition governments. **The controversy:** Critics, including human rights organizations and the Greens, raised legitimate concerns about: 1.
** * ** * 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì 所在suǒ zài suǒ zài :: : ** * ** * 批评者pī píng zhě pī píng zhě ,, , 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 人权rén quán rén quán 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 和hé hé 绿党lǜ dǎng lǜ dǎng ,, , 提出tí chū tí chū 了le le 以下yǐ xià yǐ xià 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 关切guān qiè guān qiè :: :
Transparency regarding Australia's role in US drone operations [2] 2.
11 1 .. . 关于guān yú guān yú 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 在zài zài 美国měi guó měi guó 无人机wú rén jī wú rén jī 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 中zhōng zhōng 角色jué sè jué sè 的de de 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
Legal implications for Australian personnel at Pine Gap if they are involved in targeting [2] 3.
22 2 .. . 如果rú guǒ rú guǒ PinePine Pine GapGap Gap 的de de 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 人员rén yuán rén yuán 参与cān yù cān yù 瞄准miáo zhǔn miáo zhǔn ,, , 其qí qí 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
The lack of public mandate for involvement in what some consider "extrajudicial killing" [1][2] 4.
33 3 .. . 缺乏quē fá quē fá 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng 授权shòu quán shòu quán 参与cān yù cān yù 某些mǒu xiē mǒu xiē 人rén rén 所suǒ suǒ 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 的de de "" " 法外fǎ wài fǎ wài 处决chǔ jué chǔ jué "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
Questions about whether Australian personnel could face legal liability under international law [2] **The Human Rights Law Centre** wrote to the Australian government seeking answers to basic questions: "Does the Australian Government consider itself legally at war with any State or organized arm group?
44 4 .. . 关于guān yú guān yú 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 人员rén yuán rén yuán 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 可能kě néng kě néng 面临miàn lín miàn lín 国际法guó jì fǎ guó jì fǎ 下xià xià 的de de 法律责任fǎ lǜ zé rèn fǎ lǜ zé rèn 的de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
Is Australia involved in any way in US drone strikes conducted outside of Afghanistan, and if so what is the legal basis for that involvement?" The response did not include answers to these questions [2]. **Key context:** This is **not unique to the Coalition**.
** * ** * 人权rén quán rén quán 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn ** * ** * 致函zhì hán zhì hán 澳大利亚政府ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ ,, , 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 以下yǐ xià yǐ xià 基本jī běn jī běn 问题wèn tí wèn tí 的de de 答案dá àn dá àn :: : "" " 澳大利亚政府ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 自己zì jǐ zì jǐ 与yǔ yǔ 任何rèn hé rèn hé 国家guó jiā guó jiā 或huò huò 有yǒu yǒu 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 的de de 武装wǔ zhuāng wǔ zhuāng 团体tuán tǐ tuán tǐ 处于chǔ yú chǔ yú 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 上shàng shàng 的de de 战争状态zhàn zhēng zhuàng tài zhàn zhēng zhuàng tài ?? ?
Both major parties have maintained secrecy around intelligence operations and Pine Gap since the facility's establishment in 1970.
澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 以yǐ yǐ 任何rèn hé rèn hé 方式fāng shì fāng shì 参与cān yù cān yù 美国měi guó měi guó 在zài zài 阿富汗ā fù hàn ā fù hàn 以外yǐ wài yǐ wài 地区dì qū dì qū 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 的de de 无人机wú rén jī wú rén jī 袭击xí jī xí jī ,, , 如果rú guǒ rú guǒ 是shì shì ,, , 这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 参与cān yù cān yù 的de de 法律依据fǎ lǜ yī jù fǎ lǜ yī jù 是shì shì 什么shén me shén me ?? ?
The policy of not commenting on US military operations involving Australian intelligence cooperation is bipartisan and long-standing [2][4].
"" " 答复dá fù dá fù 中未zhōng wèi zhōng wèi 包含bāo hán bāo hán 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 问题wèn tí wèn tí 的de de 答案dá àn dá àn [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng :: : ** * ** * 这zhè zhè ** * ** * 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu ** * ** * 。。 。
自该zì gāi zì gāi 设施shè shī shè shī 于yú yú 19701970 1970 年nián nián 成立chéng lì chéng lì 以来yǐ lái yǐ lái ,, , 两大liǎng dà liǎng dà 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 始终shǐ zhōng shǐ zhōng 对duì duì 情报qíng bào qíng bào 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 和hé hé PinePine Pine GapGap Gap 保持bǎo chí bǎo chí 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì 。。 。
不bù bù 对duì duì 涉及shè jí shè jí 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 情报qíng bào qíng bào 合作hé zuò hé zuò 的de de 美国měi guó měi guó 军事行动jūn shì xíng dòng jūn shì xíng dòng 发表fā biǎo fā biǎo 评论píng lùn píng lùn 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 是shì shì 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 长期cháng qī cháng qī 一致yí zhì yí zhì 的de de 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。

部分属实

6.0

/ 10

该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 在zài zài 事实shì shí shì shí 层面céng miàn céng miàn 是shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de ,, , 即jí jí CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 拒绝jù jué jù jué 就jiù jiù 无人机wú rén jī wú rén jī 袭击xí jī xí jī 发表fā biǎo fā biǎo 除chú chú 基本jī běn jī běn 确认què rèn què rèn 之外zhī wài zhī wài 的de de 评论píng lùn píng lùn 。。 。
The claim is factually accurate in that the Coalition Government refused to comment beyond basic confirmation about the drone strikes.
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 其qí qí 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 暗示àn shì àn shì 了le le 不同寻常bù tóng xún cháng bù tóng xún cháng 的de de 沉默chén mò chén mò 或huò huò 疏忽shū hū shū hū ,, , 而ér ér 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng :: :
However, the framing implies unusual silence or negligence, when in fact: 1.
11 1 .. . 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí 了le le 死亡sǐ wáng sǐ wáng 事实shì shí shì shí 和hé hé 大致dà zhì dà zhì 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng
The government did confirm the deaths and general circumstances 2.
22 2 .. . 被bèi bèi 击毙jī bì jī bì 人员rén yuán rén yuán 是shì shì AQAPAQAP AQAP 战斗人员zhàn dòu rén yuán zhàn dòu rén yuán ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 平民píng mín píng mín
The individuals killed were AQAP combatants, not civilians 3.
33 3 .. . 不bù bù 对duì duì 情报qíng bào qíng bào // / 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 细节xì jié xì jié 发表fā biǎo fā biǎo 评论píng lùn píng lùn 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 是shì shì 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ ,, , 两大liǎng dà liǎng dà 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 均jūn jūn 遵循zūn xún zūn xún
The policy of not commenting on intelligence/operational details is standard practice followed by both major parties 4.
44 4 .. . 这zhè zhè 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 了le le 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 在zài zài 情报qíng bào qíng bào 联盟lián méng lián méng 合作hé zuò hé zuò 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 的de de 长期cháng qī cháng qī 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 一致yí zhì yí zhì 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng
This reflects Australia's long-standing bipartisan position on intelligence alliance cooperation The claim omits that this is normal government practice for intelligence matters, not a unique refusal by the Coalition.
该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 忽略hū lüè hū lüè 了le le 这zhè zhè 是shì shì 情报qíng bào qíng bào 事务shì wù shì wù 的de de 正常zhèng cháng zhèng cháng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu 的de de 拒绝jù jué jù jué 态度tài dù tài dù 。。 。

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。