部分属实

评分: 5.0/10

Coalition
C0561

声明内容

“取消了一项针对执法机构获取记者电信数据以识别记者消息来源的公开调查。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis
分析时间: 30 Jan 2026

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

关于guān yú guān yú CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 执法zhí fǎ zhí fǎ 机构jī gòu jī gòu 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ 记者jì zhě jì zhě 电信diàn xìn diàn xìn 数据shù jù shù jù 的de de 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 调查diào chá diào chá 的de de 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ ** * ** * 在zài zài 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng 是shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de ** * ** * 。。 。
The claim that the Coalition government scrapped a public inquiry into law enforcement access to journalists' telecommunications data is **factually accurate**.
应yīng yīng 总zǒng zǒng 检察长jiǎn chá zhǎng jiǎn chá zhǎng GeorgeGeorge George BrandisBrandis Brandis 的de de 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú ,, , 议会yì huì yì huì 联合lián hé lián hé 情报qíng bào qíng bào 与yǔ yǔ 安全ān quán ān quán 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì (( ( PJCISPJCIS PJCIS )) ) 于yú yú 20152015 2015 年nián nián 33 3 月初yuè chū yuè chū 启动qǐ dòng qǐ dòng 了le le 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng 调查diào chá diào chá ,, , 以yǐ yǐ 审查shěn chá shěn chá "" " 如何rú hé rú hé 处理chǔ lǐ chǔ lǐ 为wèi wèi 确定què dìng què dìng 记者jì zhě jì zhě 消息来源xiāo xī lái yuán xiāo xī lái yuán 身份shēn fèn shēn fèn 而ér ér 授权shòu quán shòu quán 披露pī lù pī lù 或huò huò 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 电信diàn xìn diàn xìn 数据shù jù shù jù 的de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security (PJCIS) had initiated an inquiry in early March 2015 to examine "how to deal with the authorisation of a disclosure or use of telecommunications data for the purpose of determining the identity of a journalist's source" at the request of Attorney-General George Brandis [1].
该gāi gāi 调查diào chá diào chá 于yú yú 20152015 2015 年nián nián 77 7 月yuè yuè 66 6 日rì rì 被bèi bèi 正式zhèng shì zhèng shì 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo ,, , 且qiě qiě 未wèi wèi 举行jǔ xíng jǔ xíng 任何rèn hé rèn hé 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 听证会tīng zhèng huì tīng zhèng huì 。。 。
The inquiry was formally scrapped on July 6, 2015, without holding any public hearings.
原定yuán dìng yuán dìng 于yú yú 20152015 2015 年nián nián 33 3 月yuè yuè 2020 20 日rì rì 举行jǔ xíng jǔ xíng 的de de 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 听证会tīng zhèng huì tīng zhèng huì 被bèi bèi 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo ,, , 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 机构jī gòu jī gòu 原本yuán běn yuán běn 计划jì huà jì huà 出席chū xí chū xí ,, , 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 于yú yú 20152015 2015 年nián nián 66 6 月底yuè dǐ yuè dǐ 停止tíng zhǐ tíng zhǐ 接受jiē shòu jiē shòu 提交tí jiāo tí jiāo 材料cái liào cái liào [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
A scheduled public hearing on March 20, 2015, at which media organisations had been scheduled to appear, was cancelled, and the committee ceased accepting submissions in late June 2015 [1].
数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ (( ( 《《 《 20152015 2015 年nián nián 电信diàn xìn diàn xìn (( ( 拦截lán jié lán jié 和hé hé 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ )) ) 修正xiū zhèng xiū zhèng (( ( 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú )) ) 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 》》 》 )) ) 于yú yú 20152015 2015 年nián nián 33 3 月yuè yuè 2626 26 日rì rì 在zài zài 议会yì huì yì huì 通过tōng guò tōng guò ,, , 强制qiáng zhì qiáng zhì 电信diàn xìn diàn xìn 运营商yùn yíng shāng yùn yíng shāng 将jiāng jiāng 客户kè hù kè hù 元yuán yuán 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 两年liǎng nián liǎng nián [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The data retention legislation (Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment (Data Retention) Act 2015) passed Parliament on March 26, 2015, forcing telecommunications providers to retain customer metadata for two years [2].
该gāi gāi 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 获得huò dé huò dé 了le le CoalitionCoalition Coalition 和hé hé LaborLabor Labor 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 的de de 支持zhī chí zhī chí [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
The legislation received bipartisan support from both the Coalition and Labor [3][4].

缺失背景

** * ** * 调查diào chá diào chá 被bèi bèi 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 保护措施bǎo hù cuò shī bǎo hù cuò shī 所suǒ suǒ 取代qǔ dài qǔ dài ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 简单jiǎn dān jiǎn dān 放弃fàng qì fàng qì 。。 。
**The inquiry was replaced with legislative protections, not simply abandoned.** The claim omits critical context that the inquiry was scrapped because the government had amended the data retention bill to introduce: 1. **Journalist Information Warrants**: A warrant system specifically for accessing journalists' telecommunications data 2. **Public Interest Advocate**: An independent advocate to scrutinise warrant applications affecting journalists [1] **The PJCIS retained oversight authority.** The amendments provided that the PJCIS itself would be able to offer oversight of journalist information warrants and required annual reporting on the number of warrants issued [1]. **Labor supported the entire data retention regime.** The data retention laws passed with Labor's full support after the party initially expressed concerns but ultimately backed the legislation with amendments [3][4].
** * ** * 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ,, , 即jí jí 调查diào chá diào chá 之所以zhī suǒ yǐ zhī suǒ yǐ 被bèi bèi 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo ,, , 是因为shì yīn wèi shì yīn wèi 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 对duì duì 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 了le le 修正xiū zhèng xiū zhèng ,, , 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù 了le le :: :
The PJCIS inquiry was not a government-imposed process but a committee-initiated review that the committee itself chose to terminate. **Post-2015 developments reveal systemic issues.** In 2019, it was revealed that the Australian Federal Police accessed journalists' metadata 58 times in a single 12-month period, and conducted highly publicised raids on ABC headquarters and News Corp journalist Annika Smethurst's home [5][6].
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 记者jì zhě jì zhě 信息xìn xī xìn xī 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng ** * ** * :: : 专门zhuān mén zhuān mén 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ 记者jì zhě jì zhě 电信diàn xìn diàn xìn 数据shù jù shù jù 的de de 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng 制度zhì dù zhì dù
These events demonstrated that the warrant system provided limited practical protection.
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 公共利益gōng gòng lì yì gōng gòng lì yì 倡导者chàng dǎo zhě chàng dǎo zhě ** * ** * :: : 一名yī míng yī míng 独立dú lì dú lì 倡导者chàng dǎo zhě chàng dǎo zhě ,, , 负责fù zé fù zé 审查shěn chá shěn chá 涉及shè jí shè jí 记者jì zhě jì zhě 的de de 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
** * ** * PJCISPJCIS PJCIS 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 了le le 监督权jiān dū quán jiān dū quán 。。 。
** * ** * 修正xiū zhèng xiū zhèng 条款tiáo kuǎn tiáo kuǎn 规定guī dìng guī dìng PJCISPJCIS PJCIS 本身běn shēn běn shēn 能够néng gòu néng gòu 对duì duì 记者jì zhě jì zhě 信息xìn xī xìn xī 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 监督jiān dū jiān dū ,, , 并bìng bìng 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 每年měi nián měi nián 报告bào gào bào gào 签发qiān fā qiān fā 的de de 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng 数量shù liàng shù liàng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 支持zhī chí zhī chí 整个zhěng gè zhěng gè 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 制度zhì dù zhì dù 。。 。
** * ** * 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 法在fǎ zài fǎ zài LaborLabor Labor 党dǎng dǎng 最初zuì chū zuì chū 表达biǎo dá biǎo dá 关切guān qiè guān qiè 后hòu hòu ,, , 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 获得huò dé huò dé 了le le 该党gāi dǎng gāi dǎng 的de de 全力支持quán lì zhī chí quán lì zhī chí 并bìng bìng 通过tōng guò tōng guò 了le le 修正案xiū zhèng àn xiū zhèng àn [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
PJCISPJCIS PJCIS 调查diào chá diào chá 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 强加qiáng jiā qiáng jiā 的de de 程序chéng xù chéng xù ,, , 而是ér shì ér shì 由yóu yóu 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 自行zì xíng zì xíng 发起fā qǐ fā qǐ 并bìng bìng 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 终止zhōng zhǐ zhōng zhǐ 的de de 审查shěn chá shěn chá 。。 。
** * ** * 20152015 2015 年nián nián 后hòu hòu 的de de 发展fā zhǎn fā zhǎn 揭示jiē shì jiē shì 了le le 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 问题wèn tí wèn tí 。。 。
** * ** * 20192019 2019 年nián nián 透露tòu lù tòu lù ,, , 澳大利亚联邦ào dà lì yà lián bāng ào dà lì yà lián bāng 警察jǐng chá jǐng chá 在zài zài 1212 12 个gè gè 月yuè yuè 内nèi nèi 5858 58 次cì cì 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ 记者jì zhě jì zhě 的de de 元yuán yuán 数据shù jù shù jù ,, , 并bìng bìng 对duì duì ABCABC ABC 总部zǒng bù zǒng bù 和hé hé NewsNews News CorpCorp Corp 记者jì zhě jì zhě AnnikaAnnika Annika SmethurstSmethurst Smethurst 的de de 住所zhù suǒ zhù suǒ 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 了le le 高调gāo diào gāo diào 搜查sōu chá sōu chá [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng 制度zhì dù zhì dù 提供tí gōng tí gōng 的de de 实际shí jì shí jì 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 有限yǒu xiàn yǒu xiàn 。。 。

来源可信度评估

原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán (( ( ComputerworldComputerworld Computerworld AustraliaAustralia Australia )) ) 是shì shì IDGIDG IDG CommunicationsCommunications Communications 的de de 出版物chū bǎn wù chū bǎn wù ,, , IDGIDG IDG CommunicationsCommunications Communications 是shì shì 一家yī jiā yī jiā 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 科技kē jì kē jì 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 机构jī gòu jī gòu ,, , 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 可kě kě 识别shí bié shí bié 的de de 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng 。。 。
The original source (Computerworld Australia) is a publication of IDG Communications, a mainstream technology journalism organisation without identifiable partisan political alignment.
该gāi gāi 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 报道bào dào bào dào 事实shì shí shì shí 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn ,, , 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 明显míng xiǎn míng xiǎn 的de de 编辑biān jí biān jí 偏见piān jiàn piān jiàn 。。 。
The article reports factual events without apparent editorial bias.
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 其qí qí 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 暗示àn shì àn shì 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 调查diào chá diào chá 是shì shì 一个yí gè yí gè 负面fù miàn fù miàn 结果jié guǒ jié guǒ ,, , 却què què 未能wèi néng wèi néng 充分chōng fèn chōng fèn 解释jiě shì jiě shì 取代qǔ dài qǔ dài 调查diào chá diào chá 的de de 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 替代tì dài tì dài 方案fāng àn fāng àn 。。 。
However, the framing suggests the scrapping was a negative outcome without adequately explaining the legislative alternatives that replaced the inquiry.
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做zuò zuò 了le le 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng ?? ?
**Did Labor do something similar?** Labor not only supported the Coalition's data retention legislation but was complicit in the same processes: 1. **Bipartisan support for data retention**: Labor voted with the Coalition to pass the data retention laws in March 2015 [3][4] 2. **Committee representation**: The PJCIS includes members from both major parties.
** * ** *
The decision to scrap the inquiry was a committee decision, not a unilateral government action 3. **No Labor opposition to scrapping**: There is no record of Labor members of PJCIS dissenting from the decision to terminate the inquiry or demanding it continue 4. **Labor's own record on press freedom**: In 2019, when AFP raids on journalists occurred, Labor was in opposition and criticised the raids, but the data retention framework they helped establish enabled those actions **Scale comparison**: The data retention regime affected all Australians, not just journalists.
LaborLabor Labor 不仅bù jǐn bù jǐn 支持zhī chí zhī chí CoalitionCoalition Coalition 的de de 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ ,, , 而且ér qiě ér qiě 在zài zài 同一tóng yī tóng yī 过程guò chéng guò chéng 中zhōng zhōng 也yě yě 难逃nán táo nán táo 其咎qí jiù qí jiù :: :
Both major parties prioritised national security and law enforcement capabilities over press freedom and privacy concerns.
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 支持zhī chí zhī chí 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú ** * ** * :: : LaborLabor Labor 与yǔ yǔ CoalitionCoalition Coalition 一起yì qǐ yì qǐ 投票tóu piào tóu piào 通过tōng guò tōng guò 了le le 20152015 2015 年nián nián 33 3 月yuè yuè 的de de 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 法fǎ fǎ [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] [[ [ 44 4 ]] ]
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 代表性dài biǎo xìng dài biǎo xìng ** * ** * :: : PJCISPJCIS PJCIS 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 两大liǎng dà liǎng dà 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 的de de 成员chéng yuán chéng yuán 。。 。
取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 调查diào chá diào chá 的de de 决定jué dìng jué dìng 是shì shì 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 的de de 决定jué dìng jué dìng ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 单方面dān fāng miàn dān fāng miàn 的de de 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi
33 3 .. . ** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 未wèi wèi 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo ** * ** * :: : 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 记录jì lù jì lù 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì PJCISPJCIS PJCIS 的de de LaborLabor Labor 成员chéng yuán chéng yuán 对duì duì 终止zhōng zhǐ zhōng zhǐ 调查diào chá diào chá 的de de 决定jué dìng jué dìng 持异议chí yì yì chí yì yì 或huò huò 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 继续jì xù jì xù 调查diào chá diào chá
44 4 .. . ** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 在zài zài 新闻自由xīn wén zì yóu xīn wén zì yóu 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 的de de 记录jì lù jì lù ** * ** * :: : 20192019 2019 年nián nián ,, , 当dāng dāng AFPAFP AFP 对duì duì 记者jì zhě jì zhě 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 时shí shí ,, , LaborLabor Labor 处于chǔ yú chǔ yú 反对党fǎn duì dǎng fǎn duì dǎng 地位dì wèi dì wèi 并bìng bìng 批评pī píng pī píng 了le le 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 搜查sōu chá sōu chá ,, , 但dàn dàn 他们tā men tā men 帮助bāng zhù bāng zhù 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì 的de de 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 为wèi wèi 那些nà xiē nà xiē 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi 提供tí gōng tí gōng 了le le 条件tiáo jiàn tiáo jiàn
** * ** * 规模guī mó guī mó 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào ** * ** * :: : 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 制度zhì dù zhì dù 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 澳大利亚人ào dà lì yà rén ào dà lì yà rén ,, , 而ér ér 不仅仅bù jǐn jǐn bù jǐn jǐn 是shì shì 记者jì zhě jì zhě 。。 。
两大liǎng dà liǎng dà 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 都dōu dōu 将jiāng jiāng 国家guó jiā guó jiā 安全ān quán ān quán 和hé hé 执法zhí fǎ zhí fǎ 能力néng lì néng lì 置于zhì yú zhì yú 新闻自由xīn wén zì yóu xīn wén zì yóu 和hé hé 隐私yǐn sī yǐn sī 关切guān qiè guān qiè 之上zhī shàng zhī shàng 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

** * ** * 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 告诉gào sù gào sù 你nǐ nǐ 的de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng :: : ** * ** *
**What the claim doesn't tell you:** The inquiry was not simply "scrapped" in the sense of being abandoned without alternative.
调查diào chá diào chá 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 在zài zài 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 替代tì dài tì dài 方案fāng àn fāng àn 的de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 下xià xià "" " 被bèi bèi 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo "" " 。。 。
The PJCIS, on its own recommendation, initiated the inquiry in March 2015 and terminated it in July 2015 after the government introduced amendments establishing a warrant system and public interest advocate mechanism [1].
PJCISPJCIS PJCIS 根据gēn jù gēn jù 其qí qí 自身zì shēn zì shēn 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 于yú yú 20152015 2015 年nián nián 33 3 月yuè yuè 启动qǐ dòng qǐ dòng 调查diào chá diào chá ,, , 并bìng bìng 在zài zài 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng 制度zhì dù zhì dù 和hé hé 公共利益gōng gòng lì yì gōng gòng lì yì 倡导者chàng dǎo zhě chàng dǎo zhě 机制jī zhì jī zhì 的de de 修正案xiū zhèng àn xiū zhèng àn 后hòu hòu ,, , 于yú yú 20152015 2015 年nián nián 77 7 月yuè yuè 终止zhōng zhǐ zhōng zhǐ 调查diào chá diào chá [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The committee determined that with these legislative protections in place, a separate inquiry was unnecessary.
委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 认定rèn dìng rèn dìng ,, , 在zài zài 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 保护措施bǎo hù cuò shī bǎo hù cuò shī 到位dào wèi dào wèi 的de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 下xià xià ,, , 单独dān dú dān dú 的de de 调查diào chá diào chá 是shì shì 不必要bù bì yào bù bì yào 的de de 。。 。
The committee retained authority to oversee the warrant system through annual reporting requirements [1]. **However, the warrant system proved inadequate:** The 2019 revelations that AFP accessed journalist metadata 58 times in 12 months, with only two journalist information warrants issued, suggests the oversight mechanisms were not robust [5].
委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 通过tōng guò tōng guò 年度报告nián dù bào gào nián dù bào gào 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 了le le 对duì duì 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng 制度zhì dù zhì dù 的de de 监督权jiān dū quán jiān dū quán [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The 2019 AFP raids on ABC and News Corp demonstrated that the data retention regime enabled significant encroachment on press freedom. **Legitimate government rationale:** The data retention laws were justified as necessary for counter-terrorism and serious crime investigations [2].
** * ** * 然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng 制度zhì dù zhì dù 被bèi bèi 证明zhèng míng zhèng míng 是shì shì 不bù bù 充分chōng fèn chōng fèn 的de de :: : ** * ** *
The warrant requirements for journalists represented an attempt to balance law enforcement needs with press freedom protections. **The bipartisan nature of the issue:** Both major parties have historically prioritised national security over press freedom when these values conflict.
20192019 2019 年nián nián 透露tòu lù tòu lù ,, , AFPAFP AFP 在zài zài 1212 12 个gè gè 月yuè yuè 内nèi nèi 5858 58 次cì cì 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ 记者jì zhě jì zhě 元yuán yuán 数据shù jù shù jù ,, , 而仅ér jǐn ér jǐn 签发qiān fā qiān fā 了le le 两份liǎng fèn liǎng fèn 记者jì zhě jì zhě 信息xìn xī xìn xī 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng ,, , 这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 监督机制jiān dū jī zhì jiān dū jī zhì 并bìng bìng 不bù bù 健全jiàn quán jiàn quán [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
Labor's support for the data retention regime demonstrates this is not a uniquely Coalition issue but reflects bipartisan consensus on security matters. **Key context:** This is not unique to the Coalition.
20192019 2019 年nián nián AFPAFP AFP 对duì duì ABCABC ABC 和hé hé NewsNews News CorpCorp Corp 的de de 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng ,, , 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 制度zhì dù zhì dù 使shǐ shǐ 新闻自由xīn wén zì yóu xīn wén zì yóu 受到shòu dào shòu dào 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 侵犯qīn fàn qīn fàn 。。 。
Labor supported the same data retention framework, and the decision to terminate the inquiry was made by a bipartisan committee.
** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu :: : ** * ** *
Both parties have since been confronted with the consequences of these laws through the 2019 AFP raids and subsequent revelations about metadata access.
数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 法fǎ fǎ 被bèi bèi 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 是shì shì 反恐fǎn kǒng fǎn kǒng 和hé hé 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 犯罪fàn zuì fàn zuì 调查diào chá diào chá 所suǒ suǒ 必需bì xū bì xū 的de de [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
对duì duì 记者jì zhě jì zhě 的de de 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 了le le 在zài zài 执法zhí fǎ zhí fǎ 需求xū qiú xū qiú 与yǔ yǔ 新闻自由xīn wén zì yóu xīn wén zì yóu 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 之间zhī jiān zhī jiān 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 平衡píng héng píng héng 的de de 尝试cháng shì cháng shì 。。 。
** * ** * 问题wèn tí wèn tí 的de de 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 性质xìng zhì xìng zhì :: : ** * ** *
历史lì shǐ lì shǐ 上shàng shàng ,, , 当dāng dāng 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 价值观jià zhí guān jià zhí guān 发生冲突fā shēng chōng tū fā shēng chōng tū 时shí shí ,, , 两大liǎng dà liǎng dà 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 都dōu dōu 将jiāng jiāng 国家guó jiā guó jiā 安全ān quán ān quán 置于zhì yú zhì yú 新闻自由xīn wén zì yóu xīn wén zì yóu 之上zhī shàng zhī shàng 。。 。
LaborLabor Labor 对duì duì 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 制度zhì dù zhì dù 的de de 支持zhī chí zhī chí 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng ,, , 这zhè zhè 不是bú shì bú shì CoalitionCoalition Coalition 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu 的de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí ,, , 而是ér shì ér shì 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 了le le 在zài zài 安全ān quán ān quán 事务shì wù shì wù 上shàng shàng 的de de 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 共识gòng shí gòng shí 。。 。
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng :: : ** * ** * 这zhè zhè 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu 。。 。
LaborLabor Labor 支持zhī chí zhī chí 相同xiāng tóng xiāng tóng 的de de 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià ,, , 终止zhōng zhǐ zhōng zhǐ 调查diào chá diào chá 的de de 决定jué dìng jué dìng 是shì shì 由yóu yóu 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 作出zuò chū zuò chū 的de de 。。 。
自zì zì 那nà nà 以后yǐ hòu yǐ hòu ,, , 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 都dōu dōu 通过tōng guò tōng guò 20192019 2019 年nián nián AFPAFP AFP 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 和hé hé 随后suí hòu suí hòu 关于guān yú guān yú 元yuán yuán 数据shù jù shù jù 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ 的de de 披露pī lù pī lù 而ér ér 面对miàn duì miàn duì 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 的de de 后果hòu guǒ hòu guǒ 。。 。

部分属实

5.0

/ 10

核心hé xīn hé xīn 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 在zài zài 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng 是shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de :: : 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 执法zhí fǎ zhí fǎ 机构jī gòu jī gòu 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ 记者jì zhě jì zhě 电信diàn xìn diàn xìn 数据shù jù shù jù 的de de PJCISPJCIS PJCIS 调查diào chá diào chá 确实què shí què shí 在zài zài 20152015 2015 年nián nián 77 7 月yuè yuè 被bèi bèi 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo ,, , 且qiě qiě 未wèi wèi 举行jǔ xíng jǔ xíng 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 听证会tīng zhèng huì tīng zhèng huì 。。 。
The core claim is factually accurate: the PJCIS inquiry into law enforcement access to journalists' telecommunications data was indeed scrapped in July 2015 without holding public hearings.
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 其qí qí 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng ,, , 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi 它tā tā 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le 以下yǐ xià yǐ xià 事实shì shí shì shí :: :
However, the framing is misleading because it omits that: 1.
11 1 .. . 调查diào chá diào chá 被bèi bèi 特定tè dìng tè dìng 的de de 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 保护措施bǎo hù cuò shī bǎo hù cuò shī (( ( 记者jì zhě jì zhě 信息xìn xī xìn xī 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng 和hé hé 公共利益gōng gòng lì yì gōng gòng lì yì 倡导者chàng dǎo zhě chàng dǎo zhě )) ) 所suǒ suǒ 取代qǔ dài qǔ dài
The inquiry was replaced with specific legislative protections (journalist information warrants and public interest advocate) 2.
22 2 .. . 该gāi gāi 决定jué dìng jué dìng 是shì shì 由yóu yóu 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò LaborLabor Labor 成员chéng yuán chéng yuán 在内zài nèi zài nèi 的de de 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 作出zuò chū zuò chū 的de de
The decision was made by a bipartisan committee that included Labor members 3.
33 3 .. . LaborLabor Labor 完全wán quán wán quán 支持zhī chí zhī chí 使shǐ shǐ 调查diào chá diào chá 主题zhǔ tí zhǔ tí 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 相关性xiāng guān xìng xiāng guān xìng 的de de 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ
Labor fully supported the data retention legislation that made the inquiry's subject matter relevant 4.
44 4 .. . 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 本身běn shēn běn shēn 发起fā qǐ fā qǐ 了le le 调查diào chá diào chá ,, , 并bìng bìng 在zài zài 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 修正案xiū zhèng àn xiū zhèng àn 通过tōng guò tōng guò 后hòu hòu 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 终止zhōng zhǐ zhōng zhǐ 调查diào chá diào chá
The committee itself had initiated the inquiry and chose to terminate it after legislative amendments were made The claim presents the scrapping as a unilateral negative action by the Coalition when it was actually a bipartisan committee decision that followed the introduction of alternative oversight mechanisms.
该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 将jiāng jiāng 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 调查diào chá diào chá 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为wèi wèi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 单方面dān fāng miàn dān fāng miàn 的de de 负面fù miàn fù miàn 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi ,, , 而ér ér 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 这是zhè shì zhè shì 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 的de de 决定jué dìng jué dìng ,, , 是shì shì 在zài zài 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù 替代tì dài tì dài 监督机制jiān dū jī zhì jiān dū jī zhì 之后zhī hòu zhī hòu 作出zuò chū zuò chū 的de de 。。 。

📚 来源与引用 (6)

  1. 1
    Data retention: Inquiry into accessing of journos' data scrapped

    Data retention: Inquiry into accessing of journos' data scrapped

    An inquiry instigated after concerns were raised about the impact on the media of data retention legislation and law enforcement agencies’ access to journalists’ telecommunications data has formally been scrapped.

    Computerworld
  2. 2
    Data retention laws pass Federal Parliament as Coalition and Labor vote together

    Data retention laws pass Federal Parliament as Coalition and Labor vote together

    Contentious data retention laws pass Federal Parliament, with both major parties voting for the legislation in the Senate.

    Abc Net
  3. 3
    Labor backs controversial data retention bill

    Labor backs controversial data retention bill

    Legislation likely to pass.

    iTnews
  4. 4
    Metadata retention laws will pass as Labor folds

    Metadata retention laws will pass as Labor folds

    The Federal government's controversial $400 million plan to force telecommunications providers to store the metadata of all phone and internet users for two years will go ahead after the Labor party agreed to support the move.

    Australian Financial Review
  5. 5
    Australian Federal Police accessed journalists' metadata, stoking new media freedom concerns

    Australian Federal Police accessed journalists' metadata, stoking new media freedom concerns

    Revelations the Australian Federal Police accessed metadata from journalists' phones almost 60 times in just 12 months renew debate about balancing national security and media freedom.

    Abc Net
  6. 6
    AFP raid on ABC reveals investigative journalism being put in same category as crime

    AFP raid on ABC reveals investigative journalism being put in same category as crime

    The raid on the ABC appears to be part of a new climate in which journalists and their sources of information are targeted and receive the sort of treatment previously reserved for criminals, writes John Lyons.

    Abc Net

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。