部分属实

评分: 5.0/10

Coalition
C0561

声明内容

“取消了一项针对执法机构获取记者电信数据以识别记者消息来源的公开调查。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis
分析时间: 30 Jan 2026

原始来源

事实核查

关于guān yú guān yú CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 执法zhí fǎ zhí fǎ 机构jī gòu jī gòu 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ 记者jì zhě jì zhě 电信diàn xìn diàn xìn 数据shù jù shù jù de de 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 调查diào chá diào chá de de 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ ** * ** * zài zài 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què de de ** * ** *
The claim that the Coalition government scrapped a public inquiry into law enforcement access to journalists' telecommunications data is **factually accurate**.
yīng yīng zǒng zǒng 检察长jiǎn chá zhǎng jiǎn chá zhǎng GeorgeGeorge George BrandisBrandis Brandis de de 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 议会yì huì yì huì 联合lián hé lián hé 情报qíng bào qíng bào 安全ān quán ān quán 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì PJCISPJCIS PJCIS 20152015 2015 nián nián 33 3 月初yuè chū yuè chū 启动qǐ dòng qǐ dòng le le 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng 调查diào chá diào chá 审查shěn chá shěn chá "" " 如何rú hé rú hé 处理chǔ lǐ chǔ lǐ wèi wèi 确定què dìng què dìng 记者jì zhě jì zhě 消息来源xiāo xī lái yuán xiāo xī lái yuán 身份shēn fèn shēn fèn ér ér 授权shòu quán shòu quán 披露pī lù pī lù huò huò 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 电信diàn xìn diàn xìn 数据shù jù shù jù de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security (PJCIS) had initiated an inquiry in early March 2015 to examine "how to deal with the authorisation of a disclosure or use of telecommunications data for the purpose of determining the identity of a journalist's source" at the request of Attorney-General George Brandis [1].
gāi gāi 调查diào chá diào chá 20152015 2015 nián nián 77 7 yuè yuè 66 6 bèi bèi 正式zhèng shì zhèng shì 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo qiě qiě wèi wèi 举行jǔ xíng jǔ xíng 任何rèn hé rèn hé 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 听证会tīng zhèng huì tīng zhèng huì
The inquiry was formally scrapped on July 6, 2015, without holding any public hearings.
原定yuán dìng yuán dìng 20152015 2015 nián nián 33 3 yuè yuè 2020 20 举行jǔ xíng jǔ xíng de de 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 听证会tīng zhèng huì tīng zhèng huì bèi bèi 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 机构jī gòu jī gòu 原本yuán běn yuán běn 计划jì huà jì huà 出席chū xí chū xí 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 20152015 2015 nián nián 66 6 月底yuè dǐ yuè dǐ 停止tíng zhǐ tíng zhǐ 接受jiē shòu jiē shòu 提交tí jiāo tí jiāo 材料cái liào cái liào [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
A scheduled public hearing on March 20, 2015, at which media organisations had been scheduled to appear, was cancelled, and the committee ceased accepting submissions in late June 2015 [1].
数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 20152015 2015 nián nián 电信diàn xìn diàn xìn 拦截lán jié lán jié 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ 修正xiū zhèng xiū zhèng 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 20152015 2015 nián nián 33 3 yuè yuè 2626 26 zài zài 议会yì huì yì huì 通过tōng guò tōng guò 强制qiáng zhì qiáng zhì 电信diàn xìn diàn xìn 运营商yùn yíng shāng yùn yíng shāng jiāng jiāng 客户kè hù kè hù yuán yuán 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 两年liǎng nián liǎng nián [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
The data retention legislation (Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment (Data Retention) Act 2015) passed Parliament on March 26, 2015, forcing telecommunications providers to retain customer metadata for two years [2].
gāi gāi 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 获得huò dé huò dé le le CoalitionCoalition Coalition LaborLabor Labor 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng de de 支持zhī chí zhī chí [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] [[ [ 44 4 ]] ]
The legislation received bipartisan support from both the Coalition and Labor [3][4].

缺失背景

** * ** * 调查diào chá diào chá bèi bèi 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 保护措施bǎo hù cuò shī bǎo hù cuò shī suǒ suǒ 取代qǔ dài qǔ dài ér ér fēi fēi 简单jiǎn dān jiǎn dān 放弃fàng qì fàng qì
**The inquiry was replaced with legislative protections, not simply abandoned.** The claim omits critical context that the inquiry was scrapped because the government had amended the data retention bill to introduce: 1. **Journalist Information Warrants**: A warrant system specifically for accessing journalists' telecommunications data 2. **Public Interest Advocate**: An independent advocate to scrutinise warrant applications affecting journalists [1] **The PJCIS retained oversight authority.** The amendments provided that the PJCIS itself would be able to offer oversight of journalist information warrants and required annual reporting on the number of warrants issued [1]. **Labor supported the entire data retention regime.** The data retention laws passed with Labor's full support after the party initially expressed concerns but ultimately backed the legislation with amendments [3][4].
** * ** * gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu le le 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 调查diào chá diào chá 之所以zhī suǒ yǐ zhī suǒ yǐ bèi bèi 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 是因为shì yīn wèi shì yīn wèi 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ duì duì 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng le le 修正xiū zhèng xiū zhèng 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù le le
The PJCIS inquiry was not a government-imposed process but a committee-initiated review that the committee itself chose to terminate. **Post-2015 developments reveal systemic issues.** In 2019, it was revealed that the Australian Federal Police accessed journalists' metadata 58 times in a single 12-month period, and conducted highly publicised raids on ABC headquarters and News Corp journalist Annika Smethurst's home [5][6].
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 记者jì zhě jì zhě 信息xìn xī xìn xī 搜查sōu chá sōu chá lìng lìng ** * ** * 专门zhuān mén zhuān mén 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ 记者jì zhě jì zhě 电信diàn xìn diàn xìn 数据shù jù shù jù de de 搜查sōu chá sōu chá lìng lìng 制度zhì dù zhì dù
These events demonstrated that the warrant system provided limited practical protection.
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 公共利益gōng gòng lì yì gōng gòng lì yì 倡导者chàng dǎo zhě chàng dǎo zhě ** * ** * 一名yī míng yī míng 独立dú lì dú lì 倡导者chàng dǎo zhě chàng dǎo zhě 负责fù zé fù zé 审查shěn chá shěn chá 涉及shè jí shè jí 记者jì zhě jì zhě de de 搜查sōu chá sōu chá lìng lìng 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
** * ** * PJCISPJCIS PJCIS 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú le le 监督权jiān dū quán jiān dū quán
** * ** * 修正xiū zhèng xiū zhèng 条款tiáo kuǎn tiáo kuǎn 规定guī dìng guī dìng PJCISPJCIS PJCIS 本身běn shēn běn shēn 能够néng gòu néng gòu duì duì 记者jì zhě jì zhě 信息xìn xī xìn xī 搜查sōu chá sōu chá lìng lìng 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 监督jiān dū jiān dū bìng bìng 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 每年měi nián měi nián 报告bào gào bào gào 签发qiān fā qiān fā de de 搜查sōu chá sōu chá lìng lìng 数量shù liàng shù liàng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 支持zhī chí zhī chí 整个zhěng gè zhěng gè 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 制度zhì dù zhì dù
** * ** * 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 法在fǎ zài fǎ zài LaborLabor Labor dǎng dǎng 最初zuì chū zuì chū 表达biǎo dá biǎo dá 关切guān qiè guān qiè hòu hòu 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 获得huò dé huò dé le le 该党gāi dǎng gāi dǎng de de 全力支持quán lì zhī chí quán lì zhī chí bìng bìng 通过tōng guò tōng guò le le 修正案xiū zhèng àn xiū zhèng àn [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] [[ [ 44 4 ]] ]
PJCISPJCIS PJCIS 调查diào chá diào chá 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 强加qiáng jiā qiáng jiā de de 程序chéng xù chéng xù 而是ér shì ér shì yóu yóu 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 自行zì xíng zì xíng 发起fā qǐ fā qǐ bìng bìng 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 终止zhōng zhǐ zhōng zhǐ de de 审查shěn chá shěn chá
** * ** * 20152015 2015 nián nián hòu hòu de de 发展fā zhǎn fā zhǎn 揭示jiē shì jiē shì le le 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 问题wèn tí wèn tí
** * ** * 20192019 2019 nián nián 透露tòu lù tòu lù 澳大利亚联邦ào dà lì yà lián bāng ào dà lì yà lián bāng 警察jǐng chá jǐng chá zài zài 1212 12 yuè yuè nèi nèi 5858 58 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ 记者jì zhě jì zhě de de yuán yuán 数据shù jù shù jù bìng bìng duì duì ABCABC ABC 总部zǒng bù zǒng bù NewsNews News CorpCorp Corp 记者jì zhě jì zhě AnnikaAnnika Annika SmethurstSmethurst Smethurst de de 住所zhù suǒ zhù suǒ 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng le le 高调gāo diào gāo diào 搜查sōu chá sōu chá [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] [[ [ 66 6 ]] ]
这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 搜查sōu chá sōu chá lìng lìng 制度zhì dù zhì dù 提供tí gōng tí gōng de de 实际shí jì shí jì 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 有限yǒu xiàn yǒu xiàn

来源可信度评估

原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán ComputerworldComputerworld Computerworld AustraliaAustralia Australia shì shì IDGIDG IDG CommunicationsCommunications Communications de de 出版物chū bǎn wù chū bǎn wù IDGIDG IDG CommunicationsCommunications Communications shì shì 一家yī jiā yī jiā 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 科技kē jì kē jì 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 机构jī gòu jī gòu 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 识别shí bié shí bié de de 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng
The original source (Computerworld Australia) is a publication of IDG Communications, a mainstream technology journalism organisation without identifiable partisan political alignment.
gāi gāi 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 报道bào dào bào dào 事实shì shí shì shí 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 明显míng xiǎn míng xiǎn de de 编辑biān jí biān jí 偏见piān jiàn piān jiàn
The article reports factual events without apparent editorial bias.
然而rán ér rán ér 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 暗示àn shì àn shì 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 调查diào chá diào chá shì shì 一个yí gè yí gè 负面fù miàn fù miàn 结果jié guǒ jié guǒ què què 未能wèi néng wèi néng 充分chōng fèn chōng fèn 解释jiě shì jiě shì 取代qǔ dài qǔ dài 调查diào chá diào chá de de 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 替代tì dài tì dài 方案fāng àn fāng àn
However, the framing suggests the scrapping was a negative outcome without adequately explaining the legislative alternatives that replaced the inquiry.
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu zuò zuò le le 类似lèi sì lèi sì de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng
**Did Labor do something similar?** Labor not only supported the Coalition's data retention legislation but was complicit in the same processes: 1. **Bipartisan support for data retention**: Labor voted with the Coalition to pass the data retention laws in March 2015 [3][4] 2. **Committee representation**: The PJCIS includes members from both major parties.
** * ** *
The decision to scrap the inquiry was a committee decision, not a unilateral government action 3. **No Labor opposition to scrapping**: There is no record of Labor members of PJCIS dissenting from the decision to terminate the inquiry or demanding it continue 4. **Labor's own record on press freedom**: In 2019, when AFP raids on journalists occurred, Labor was in opposition and criticised the raids, but the data retention framework they helped establish enabled those actions **Scale comparison**: The data retention regime affected all Australians, not just journalists.
LaborLabor Labor 不仅bù jǐn bù jǐn 支持zhī chí zhī chí CoalitionCoalition Coalition de de 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 而且ér qiě ér qiě zài zài 同一tóng yī tóng yī 过程guò chéng guò chéng zhōng zhōng 难逃nán táo nán táo 其咎qí jiù qí jiù
Both major parties prioritised national security and law enforcement capabilities over press freedom and privacy concerns.
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 支持zhī chí zhī chí 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú ** * ** * LaborLabor Labor CoalitionCoalition Coalition 一起yì qǐ yì qǐ 投票tóu piào tóu piào 通过tōng guò tōng guò le le 20152015 2015 nián nián 33 3 yuè yuè de de 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] [[ [ 44 4 ]] ]
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 代表性dài biǎo xìng dài biǎo xìng ** * ** * PJCISPJCIS PJCIS 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 两大liǎng dà liǎng dà 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng de de 成员chéng yuán chéng yuán
取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 调查diào chá diào chá de de 决定jué dìng jué dìng shì shì 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì de de 决定jué dìng jué dìng ér ér fēi fēi 单方面dān fāng miàn dān fāng miàn de de 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi
33 3 .. . ** * ** * LaborLabor Labor wèi wèi 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo ** * ** * 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 记录jì lù jì lù 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì PJCISPJCIS PJCIS de de LaborLabor Labor 成员chéng yuán chéng yuán duì duì 终止zhōng zhǐ zhōng zhǐ 调查diào chá diào chá de de 决定jué dìng jué dìng 持异议chí yì yì chí yì yì huò huò 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 继续jì xù jì xù 调查diào chá diào chá
44 4 .. . ** * ** * LaborLabor Labor zài zài 新闻自由xīn wén zì yóu xīn wén zì yóu 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn de de 记录jì lù jì lù ** * ** * 20192019 2019 nián nián dāng dāng AFPAFP AFP duì duì 记者jì zhě jì zhě 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 搜查sōu chá sōu chá shí shí LaborLabor Labor 处于chǔ yú chǔ yú 反对党fǎn duì dǎng fǎn duì dǎng 地位dì wèi dì wèi bìng bìng 批评pī píng pī píng le le 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 搜查sōu chá sōu chá dàn dàn 他们tā men tā men 帮助bāng zhù bāng zhù 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì de de 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià wèi wèi 那些nà xiē nà xiē 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi 提供tí gōng tí gōng le le 条件tiáo jiàn tiáo jiàn
** * ** * 规模guī mó guī mó 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào ** * ** * 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 制度zhì dù zhì dù 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 澳大利亚人ào dà lì yà rén ào dà lì yà rén ér ér 不仅仅bù jǐn jǐn bù jǐn jǐn shì shì 记者jì zhě jì zhě
两大liǎng dà liǎng dà 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng dōu dōu jiāng jiāng 国家guó jiā guó jiā 安全ān quán ān quán 执法zhí fǎ zhí fǎ 能力néng lì néng lì 置于zhì yú zhì yú 新闻自由xīn wén zì yóu xīn wén zì yóu 隐私yǐn sī yǐn sī 关切guān qiè guān qiè 之上zhī shàng zhī shàng
🌐

平衡视角

** * ** * gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 告诉gào sù gào sù de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng ** * ** *
**What the claim doesn't tell you:** The inquiry was not simply "scrapped" in the sense of being abandoned without alternative.
调查diào chá diào chá 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi zài zài 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 替代tì dài tì dài 方案fāng àn fāng àn de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng xià xià "" " bèi bèi 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo "" "
The PJCIS, on its own recommendation, initiated the inquiry in March 2015 and terminated it in July 2015 after the government introduced amendments establishing a warrant system and public interest advocate mechanism [1].
PJCISPJCIS PJCIS 根据gēn jù gēn jù 自身zì shēn zì shēn 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 20152015 2015 nián nián 33 3 yuè yuè 启动qǐ dòng qǐ dòng 调查diào chá diào chá bìng bìng zài zài 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì 搜查sōu chá sōu chá lìng lìng 制度zhì dù zhì dù 公共利益gōng gòng lì yì gōng gòng lì yì 倡导者chàng dǎo zhě chàng dǎo zhě 机制jī zhì jī zhì de de 修正案xiū zhèng àn xiū zhèng àn hòu hòu 20152015 2015 nián nián 77 7 yuè yuè 终止zhōng zhǐ zhōng zhǐ 调查diào chá diào chá [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The committee determined that with these legislative protections in place, a separate inquiry was unnecessary.
委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 认定rèn dìng rèn dìng zài zài 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 保护措施bǎo hù cuò shī bǎo hù cuò shī 到位dào wèi dào wèi de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng xià xià 单独dān dú dān dú de de 调查diào chá diào chá shì shì 不必要bù bì yào bù bì yào de de
The committee retained authority to oversee the warrant system through annual reporting requirements [1]. **However, the warrant system proved inadequate:** The 2019 revelations that AFP accessed journalist metadata 58 times in 12 months, with only two journalist information warrants issued, suggests the oversight mechanisms were not robust [5].
委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 通过tōng guò tōng guò 年度报告nián dù bào gào nián dù bào gào 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú le le duì duì 搜查sōu chá sōu chá lìng lìng 制度zhì dù zhì dù de de 监督权jiān dū quán jiān dū quán [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The 2019 AFP raids on ABC and News Corp demonstrated that the data retention regime enabled significant encroachment on press freedom. **Legitimate government rationale:** The data retention laws were justified as necessary for counter-terrorism and serious crime investigations [2].
** * ** * 然而rán ér rán ér 搜查sōu chá sōu chá lìng lìng 制度zhì dù zhì dù bèi bèi 证明zhèng míng zhèng míng shì shì 充分chōng fèn chōng fèn de de ** * ** *
The warrant requirements for journalists represented an attempt to balance law enforcement needs with press freedom protections. **The bipartisan nature of the issue:** Both major parties have historically prioritised national security over press freedom when these values conflict.
20192019 2019 nián nián 透露tòu lù tòu lù AFPAFP AFP zài zài 1212 12 yuè yuè nèi nèi 5858 58 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ 记者jì zhě jì zhě yuán yuán 数据shù jù shù jù 而仅ér jǐn ér jǐn 签发qiān fā qiān fā le le 两份liǎng fèn liǎng fèn 记者jì zhě jì zhě 信息xìn xī xìn xī 搜查sōu chá sōu chá lìng lìng zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 监督机制jiān dū jī zhì jiān dū jī zhì bìng bìng 健全jiàn quán jiàn quán [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
Labor's support for the data retention regime demonstrates this is not a uniquely Coalition issue but reflects bipartisan consensus on security matters. **Key context:** This is not unique to the Coalition.
20192019 2019 nián nián AFPAFP AFP duì duì ABCABC ABC NewsNews News CorpCorp Corp de de 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 制度zhì dù zhì dù 使shǐ shǐ 新闻自由xīn wén zì yóu xīn wén zì yóu 受到shòu dào shòu dào 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 侵犯qīn fàn qīn fàn
Labor supported the same data retention framework, and the decision to terminate the inquiry was made by a bipartisan committee.
** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ de de 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu ** * ** *
Both parties have since been confronted with the consequences of these laws through the 2019 AFP raids and subsequent revelations about metadata access.
数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú bèi bèi 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi shì shì 反恐fǎn kǒng fǎn kǒng 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 犯罪fàn zuì fàn zuì 调查diào chá diào chá suǒ suǒ 必需bì xū bì xū de de [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
duì duì 记者jì zhě jì zhě de de 搜查sōu chá sōu chá lìng lìng 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo le le zài zài 执法zhí fǎ zhí fǎ 需求xū qiú xū qiú 新闻自由xīn wén zì yóu xīn wén zì yóu 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 之间zhī jiān zhī jiān 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 平衡píng héng píng héng de de 尝试cháng shì cháng shì
** * ** * 问题wèn tí wèn tí de de 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 性质xìng zhì xìng zhì ** * ** *
历史lì shǐ lì shǐ shàng shàng dāng dāng 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 价值观jià zhí guān jià zhí guān 发生冲突fā shēng chōng tū fā shēng chōng tū shí shí 两大liǎng dà liǎng dà 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng dōu dōu jiāng jiāng 国家guó jiā guó jiā 安全ān quán ān quán 置于zhì yú zhì yú 新闻自由xīn wén zì yóu xīn wén zì yóu 之上zhī shàng zhī shàng
LaborLabor Labor duì duì 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 制度zhì dù zhì dù de de 支持zhī chí zhī chí 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng zhè zhè 不是bú shì bú shì CoalitionCoalition Coalition 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí 而是ér shì ér shì 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng le le zài zài 安全ān quán ān quán 事务shì wù shì wù shàng shàng de de 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 共识gòng shí gòng shí
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ** * ** * zhè zhè 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu
LaborLabor Labor 支持zhī chí zhī chí 相同xiāng tóng xiāng tóng de de 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 终止zhōng zhǐ zhōng zhǐ 调查diào chá diào chá de de 决定jué dìng jué dìng shì shì yóu yóu 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 作出zuò chū zuò chū de de
以后yǐ hòu yǐ hòu 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng dōu dōu 通过tōng guò tōng guò 20192019 2019 nián nián AFPAFP AFP 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 随后suí hòu suí hòu 关于guān yú guān yú yuán yuán 数据shù jù shù jù 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ de de 披露pī lù pī lù ér ér 面对miàn duì miàn duì 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ de de 后果hòu guǒ hòu guǒ

部分属实

5.0

/ 10

核心hé xīn hé xīn 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ zài zài 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què de de 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 执法zhí fǎ zhí fǎ 机构jī gòu jī gòu 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ 记者jì zhě jì zhě 电信diàn xìn diàn xìn 数据shù jù shù jù de de PJCISPJCIS PJCIS 调查diào chá diào chá 确实què shí què shí zài zài 20152015 2015 nián nián 77 7 yuè yuè bèi bèi 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo qiě qiě wèi wèi 举行jǔ xíng jǔ xíng 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 听证会tīng zhèng huì tīng zhèng huì
The core claim is factually accurate: the PJCIS inquiry into law enforcement access to journalists' telecommunications data was indeed scrapped in July 2015 without holding public hearings.
然而rán ér rán ér 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu le le 以下yǐ xià yǐ xià 事实shì shí shì shí
However, the framing is misleading because it omits that: 1.
11 1 .. . 调查diào chá diào chá bèi bèi 特定tè dìng tè dìng de de 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 保护措施bǎo hù cuò shī bǎo hù cuò shī 记者jì zhě jì zhě 信息xìn xī xìn xī 搜查sōu chá sōu chá lìng lìng 公共利益gōng gòng lì yì gōng gòng lì yì 倡导者chàng dǎo zhě chàng dǎo zhě suǒ suǒ 取代qǔ dài qǔ dài
The inquiry was replaced with specific legislative protections (journalist information warrants and public interest advocate) 2.
22 2 .. . gāi gāi 决定jué dìng jué dìng shì shì yóu yóu 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò LaborLabor Labor 成员chéng yuán chéng yuán 在内zài nèi zài nèi de de 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 作出zuò chū zuò chū de de
The decision was made by a bipartisan committee that included Labor members 3.
33 3 .. . LaborLabor Labor 完全wán quán wán quán 支持zhī chí zhī chí 使shǐ shǐ 调查diào chá diào chá 主题zhǔ tí zhǔ tí 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 相关性xiāng guān xìng xiāng guān xìng de de 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ
Labor fully supported the data retention legislation that made the inquiry's subject matter relevant 4.
44 4 .. . 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 本身běn shēn běn shēn 发起fā qǐ fā qǐ le le 调查diào chá diào chá bìng bìng zài zài 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 修正案xiū zhèng àn xiū zhèng àn 通过tōng guò tōng guò hòu hòu 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 终止zhōng zhǐ zhōng zhǐ 调查diào chá diào chá
The committee itself had initiated the inquiry and chose to terminate it after legislative amendments were made The claim presents the scrapping as a unilateral negative action by the Coalition when it was actually a bipartisan committee decision that followed the introduction of alternative oversight mechanisms.
gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ jiāng jiāng 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 调查diào chá diào chá 描述miáo shù miáo shù wèi wèi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 单方面dān fāng miàn dān fāng miàn de de 负面fù miàn fù miàn 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi ér ér 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 这是zhè shì zhè shì 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì de de 决定jué dìng jué dìng shì shì zài zài 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù 替代tì dài tì dài 监督机制jiān dū jī zhì jiān dū jī zhì 之后zhī hòu zhī hòu 作出zuò chū zuò chū de de

📚 来源与引用 (6)

  1. 1
    Data retention: Inquiry into accessing of journos' data scrapped

    Data retention: Inquiry into accessing of journos' data scrapped

    An inquiry instigated after concerns were raised about the impact on the media of data retention legislation and law enforcement agencies’ access to journalists’ telecommunications data has formally been scrapped.

    Computerworld
  2. 2
    Data retention laws pass Federal Parliament as Coalition and Labor vote together

    Data retention laws pass Federal Parliament as Coalition and Labor vote together

    Contentious data retention laws pass Federal Parliament, with both major parties voting for the legislation in the Senate.

    Abc Net
  3. 3
    Labor backs controversial data retention bill

    Labor backs controversial data retention bill

    Legislation likely to pass.

    iTnews
  4. 4
    Metadata retention laws will pass as Labor folds

    Metadata retention laws will pass as Labor folds

    The Federal government's controversial $400 million plan to force telecommunications providers to store the metadata of all phone and internet users for two years will go ahead after the Labor party agreed to support the move.

    Australian Financial Review
  5. 5
    Australian Federal Police accessed journalists' metadata, stoking new media freedom concerns

    Australian Federal Police accessed journalists' metadata, stoking new media freedom concerns

    Revelations the Australian Federal Police accessed metadata from journalists' phones almost 60 times in just 12 months renew debate about balancing national security and media freedom.

    Abc Net
  6. 6
    AFP raid on ABC reveals investigative journalism being put in same category as crime

    AFP raid on ABC reveals investigative journalism being put in same category as crime

    The raid on the ABC appears to be part of a new climate in which journalists and their sources of information are targeted and receive the sort of treatment previously reserved for criminals, writes John Lyons.

    Abc Net

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。