部分属实

评分： 6.0/10

报告问题
Coalition
C0363

声明内容

“投票反对将医用大麻的等待时间从数月缩短至数小时的改革。目前，获得3个月药物用量的批准需要长达19个月。”
新冠疫情 反恐
原始来源： Matthew Davis

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

###### ### 核心hé xīn hé xīn 事实shì shí shì shí 已yǐ yǐ 确认què rèn què rèn
### Core Facts Confirmed
 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 识别shí bié shí bié 了le le 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 的de de 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn 。。 。
The claim accurately identifies a real legislative event.
 20172017 2017 年nián nián 55 5 月yuè yuè 1111 11 日rì rì ，， ， GreensGreens Greens 向xiàng xiàng 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 提出tí chū tí chū 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn ，， ， 拟nǐ nǐ 修订xiū dìng xiū dìng SpecialSpecial Special AccessAccess Access SchemeScheme Scheme (( ( SASSAS SAS )) ) 的de de CategoryCategory Category AA A ，， ， 允许yǔn xǔ yǔn xǔ 临终lín zhōng lín zhōng 病患bìng huàn bìng huàn 快速kuài sù kuài sù 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ 医用yī yòng yī yòng 大麻dà má dà má [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
On 11 May 2017, the Greens introduced a bill into the Australian Senate that would have amended Category A of the Special Access Scheme (SAS) to allow fast-tracked access to medicinal cannabis for terminally ill patients [1].
 根据gēn jù gēn jù 该gāi gāi 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 的de de 意图yì tú yì tú ，， ， 这项zhè xiàng zhè xiàng 措施cuò shī cuò shī 将jiāng jiāng 把bǎ bǎ 等待时间děng dài shí jiān děng dài shí jiān "" " 从cóng cóng 数月shù yuè shù yuè 缩短suō duǎn suō duǎn 至数zhì shù zhì shù 小时xiǎo shí xiǎo shí "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
This measure would have reduced waiting times "from months to hours" according to the bill's intent [1].
 CoalitionCoalition Coalition 确实què shí què shí 投票tóu piào tóu piào 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 该gāi gāi 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 。。 。
The Coalition did vote against this bill.
 投票tóu piào tóu piào 结果jié guǒ jié guǒ 为wèi wèi 3232 32 比bǐ bǐ 3232 32 （（ （ 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 平票píng piào píng piào 自动zì dòng zì dòng 导致dǎo zhì dǎo zhì 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 被bèi bèi 否决fǒu jué fǒu jué ）） ） ，， ， "" " OneOne One NationNation Nation 、、 、 NickNick Nick XenophonXenophon Xenophon 团队tuán duì tuán duì 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 独立dú lì dú lì 议员yì yuán yì yuán CoryCory Cory BernardiBernardi Bernardi 和hé hé LucyLucy Lucy GichuhiGichuhi Gichuhi 与yǔ yǔ CoalitionCoalition Coalition 一同yī tóng yī tóng 投票tóu piào tóu piào 否决fǒu jué fǒu jué 该gāi gāi 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The vote was 32-32 (a tied vote in the Senate automatically defeats a bill), with "One Nation, the Nick Xenophon team and independents Cory Bernardi and Lucy Gichuhi voted with the Coalition to defeat the bill" [1].
 LaborLabor Labor 党dǎng dǎng 支持zhī chí zhī chí 该gāi gāi 动议dòng yì dòng yì ，， ， DavidDavid David LeyonhjelmLeyonhjelm Leyonhjelm 和hé hé DerrynDerryn Derryn HinchHinch Hinch 也yě yě 投tóu tóu 了le le 赞成票zàn chéng piào zàn chéng piào [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The Labor Party supported the motion, along with David Leyonhjelm and Derryn Hinch [1].
 ###### ### 等待时间děng dài shí jiān děng dài shí jiān —— — —— — 1919 19 个gè gè 月yuè yuè 已yǐ yǐ 核实hé shí hé shí
### Wait Times - 19 Months Verified
 1919 19 个gè gè 月yuè yuè 等待时间děng dài shí jiān děng dài shí jiān 的de de 数据shù jù shù jù 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 且qiě qiě 有yǒu yǒu 文献wén xiàn wén xiàn 记录jì lù jì lù 。。 。
The 19-month wait time figure is accurate and well-documented.
 根据gēn jù gēn jù ABCABC ABC HackHack Hack 调查diào chá diào chá ，， ， 1818 18 岁suì suì 的de de LindsayLindsay Lindsay CarterCarter Carter "" " 是shì shì 昆士兰州kūn shì lán zhōu kūn shì lán zhōu 首位shǒu wèi shǒu wèi 通过tōng guò tōng guò SASSAS SAS 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ 医用yī yòng yī yòng 大麻dà má dà má 的de de 人rén rén …… … …… … 他花tā huā tā huā 了le le 1919 19 个gè gè 月yuè yuè 才cái cái 获得huò dé huò dé 33 3 个gè gè 月yuè yuè 的de de 药物yào wù yào wù "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
According to the ABC Hack investigation, 18-year-old Lindsay Carter "was the first person in Queensland to get medical cannabis through SAS...it took 19 months for him to access three months of medication" [2].
 ABCABC ABC 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū "" " 正如zhèng rú zhèng rú LindsayLindsay Lindsay 去年qù nián qù nián 告诉gào sù gào sù HackHack Hack 的de de 那样nà yàng nà yàng ，， ， 他花tā huā tā huā 了le le 1919 19 个gè gè 月yuè yuè 才cái cái 获得huò dé huò dé 33 3 个gè gè 月yuè yuè 的de de 药物yào wù yào wù "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The ABC article notes "As Lindsay told Hack last year, it took 19 months for him to access three months of medication" [2].
 ###### ### 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ：： ： CategoryCategory Category AA A 为何wèi hé wèi hé 被bèi bèi 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo
### Context: Why Category A Was Removed
 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 的de de 是shì shì ，， ， 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le 关于guān yú guān yú 审批shěn pī shěn pī 流程liú chéng liú chéng 为何wèi hé wèi hé 变得biàn dé biàn dé 如此rú cǐ rú cǐ 漫长màn cháng màn cháng 的de de 基本jī běn jī běn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 。。 。
Critically, this claim omits essential context about how the approval process became this lengthy in the first place.
 20162016 2016 年nián nián ，， ， 时任shí rèn shí rèn 卫生部长wèi shēng bù zhǎng wèi shēng bù zhǎng SussanSussan Sussan LeyLey Ley 明确míng què míng què 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 了le le 医用yī yòng yī yòng 大麻dà má dà má 使用者shǐ yòng zhě shǐ yòng zhě 的de de CategoryCategory Category AA A 通道tōng dào tōng dào [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
In 2016, then-Health Minister Sussan Ley explicitly removed Category A access for medicinal cannabis users [1].
 根据gēn jù gēn jù BuzzFeedBuzzFeed BuzzFeed 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng ，， ， "" " 时任shí rèn shí rèn 卫生部长wèi shēng bù zhǎng wèi shēng bù zhǎng SussanSussan Sussan LeyLey Ley 在zài zài 20162016 2016 年nián nián 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 了le le 医用yī yòng yī yòng 大麻dà má dà má 使用者shǐ yòng zhě shǐ yòng zhě 的de de SASSAS SAS CategoryCategory Category AA A 通道tōng dào tōng dào 。。 。
According to the BuzzFeed article, "Access to Category A of the SAS was removed for medicinal cannabis users by then minister for health Sussan Ley in 2016.
 她tā tā 的de de 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 是shì shì 医用yī yòng yī yòng 大麻dà má dà má 缺乏quē fá quē fá 适当shì dàng shì dàng 的de de 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 水平shuǐ píng shuǐ píng "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
Her reasoning was that there was not an appropriate level of oversight on medicinal cannabis" [1].
 这zhè zhè 意味着yì wèi zhe yì wèi zhe CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 制造zhì zào zhì zào 了le le GreensGreens Greens 20172017 2017 年nián nián 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 试图shì tú shì tú 解决jiě jué jiě jué 的de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí 。。 。
This means the Coalition government had actually created the very problem the Greens' 2017 bill attempted to fix.
 当dāng dāng 医用yī yòng yī yòng 大麻dà má dà má 在zài zài 20162016 2016 年nián nián 合法化hé fǎ huà hé fǎ huà 时shí shí ，， ， CoalitionCoalition Coalition 故意gù yì gù yì 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 了le le 更gèng gèng 快速kuài sù kuài sù 的de de CategoryCategory Category AA A 审批shěn pī shěn pī 通道tōng dào tōng dào ，， ， 迫使pò shǐ pò shǐ 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 患者huàn zhě huàn zhě 通过tōng guò tōng guò 更慢gèng màn gèng màn 的de de CategoryCategory Category BB B 流程liú chéng liú chéng 。。 。
When medicinal cannabis was legalised in 2016, the Coalition deliberately restricted access to the faster Category A approval pathway, forcing all patients through the slower Category B process.

缺失背景

该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 将jiāng jiāng CoalitionCoalition Coalition 的de de 投票tóu piào tóu piào 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 为wèi wèi 冷酷lěng kù lěng kù 的de de 漠视mò shì mò shì ，， ， 但dàn dàn 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ：： ：
The claim presents the Coalition vote as callous indifference, but omits critical context: **1.
 ** * ** * 11 1 .. . CoalitionCoalition Coalition 在zài zài 1212 12 个gè gè 月yuè yuè 前qián qián 故意gù yì gù yì 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 了le le 通道tōng dào tōng dào ** * ** *
The Coalition had deliberately restricted access 12 months earlier** The wait times problem existed because the Coalition's 2016 policy removed the Category A fast-track option [1][2].
 等待时间děng dài shí jiān děng dài shí jiān 问题wèn tí wèn tí 之所以zhī suǒ yǐ zhī suǒ yǐ 存在cún zài cún zài ，， ， 是因为shì yīn wèi shì yīn wèi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 的de de 20162016 2016 年nián nián 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 了le le CategoryCategory Category AA A 快速通道kuài sù tōng dào kuài sù tōng dào [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The Greens' 2017 bill was essentially asking the Coalition to reverse its own 2016 decision. **2.
 GreensGreens Greens 的de de 20172017 2017 年nián nián 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 是shì shì 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú CoalitionCoalition Coalition 推翻tuī fān tuī fān 其qí qí 自己zì jǐ zì jǐ 20162016 2016 年nián nián 的de de 决定jué dìng jué dìng 。。 。
Justification provided for the restriction** The Coalition's reasoning for removing Category A access was concern about "an appropriate level of oversight on medicinal cannabis" [1].
 ** * ** * 22 2 .. . 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 措施cuò shī cuò shī 提供tí gōng tí gōng 了le le 正当理由zhèng dāng lǐ yóu zhèng dāng lǐ yóu ** * ** *
While this reason is debatable, it was not arbitrary or without stated justification. **3.
 CoalitionCoalition Coalition 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo CategoryCategory Category AA A 通道tōng dào tōng dào 的de de 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 是shì shì 担心dān xīn dān xīn "" " 医用yī yòng yī yòng 大麻dà má dà má 缺乏quē fá quē fá 适当shì dàng shì dàng 的de de 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 水平shuǐ píng shuǐ píng "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
Alternative process was available (though inadequate)** Patients could apply through Category B of the Special Access Scheme, though it was slow and bureaucratic.
 虽然suī rán suī rán 这一zhè yī zhè yī 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 存在cún zài cún zài 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì ，， ， 但dàn dàn 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 毫无根据háo wú gēn jù háo wú gēn jù 或huò huò 随意suí yì suí yì 为wèi wèi 之zhī zhī 。。 。
The ABC reported that while "doctors can technically apply for approval to get medicinal cannabis products from overseas, the Australian Medical Association (AMA) says most GPs are unclear on the process" [2]. **4.
 ** * ** * 33 3 .. . 替代tì dài tì dài 流程liú chéng liú chéng 可用kě yòng kě yòng （（ （ 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 不bù bù 充分chōng fèn chōng fèn ）） ） ** * ** *
Supply issues were ongoing** The ABC article notes that 12 months after legalisation, "local medical cannabis is not yet a reality.
 患者huàn zhě huàn zhě 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ 通过tōng guò tōng guò SpecialSpecial Special AccessAccess Access SchemeScheme Scheme 的de de CategoryCategory Category BB B 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng ，， ， 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 流程liú chéng liú chéng 缓慢huǎn màn huǎn màn 且qiě qiě 官僚guān liáo guān liáo 。。 。
According to the Office of Drug Control: one license has been granted for the cultivation of cannabis for research purposes; no licenses have been granted for medicinal cannabis cultivation; and no licenses have been granted for the manufacture of cannabis-containing drugs" [2].
 ABCABC ABC 报道bào dào bào dào 称chēng chēng ，， ， 虽然suī rán suī rán "" " 医生yī shēng yī shēng 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ 从技术上cóng jì shù shàng cóng jì shù shàng 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn 从cóng cóng 海外hǎi wài hǎi wài 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ 医用yī yòng yī yòng 大麻dà má dà má 产品chǎn pǐn chǎn pǐn ，， ， 但dàn dàn 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 医学yī xué yī xué 协会xié huì xié huì (( ( AMAAMA AMA )) ) 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 大多数dà duō shù dà duō shù 全科quán kē quán kē 医生yī shēng yī shēng 对duì duì 该gāi gāi 流程liú chéng liú chéng 不bù bù 清楚qīng chǔ qīng chǔ "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
Health Minister Greg Hunt announced he would import medicinal cannabis in bulk to address supply shortages [2]. **5.
 ** * ** * 44 4 .. . 供应gōng yìng gōng yìng 问题wèn tí wèn tí 持续chí xù chí xù 存在cún zài cún zài ** * ** *
Medical establishment had concerns about safety** Dr John Lawson, a specialist in childhood epilepsy, expressed concern that "sick and desperate people are being told that medical cannabis is a cure all" [2].
 ABCABC ABC 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū ，， ， 合法化hé fǎ huà hé fǎ huà 1212 12 个gè gè 月yuè yuè 后hòu hòu ，， ， "" " 本地běn dì běn dì 医用yī yòng yī yòng 大麻dà má dà má 尚未shàng wèi shàng wèi 成为chéng wéi chéng wéi 现实xiàn shí xiàn shí 。。 。
The Australian Medical Association agreed, stating "It's really premature to think that it's going to be the you-beaut solution for all types of pain and other issues" [2].
 根据gēn jù gēn jù 毒品dú pǐn dú pǐn 管制guǎn zhì guǎn zhì 办公室bàn gōng shì bàn gōng shì ：： ： 仅jǐn jǐn 发放fā fàng fā fàng 了le le 一张yī zhāng yī zhāng 用于yòng yú yòng yú 研究yán jiū yán jiū 目的mù dì mù dì 种植zhòng zhí zhòng zhí 大麻dà má dà má 的de de 许可证xǔ kě zhèng xǔ kě zhèng ；； ； 未wèi wèi 发放fā fàng fā fàng 任何rèn hé rèn hé 医用yī yòng yī yòng 大麻dà má dà má 种植zhòng zhí zhòng zhí 许可证xǔ kě zhèng xǔ kě zhèng ；； ； 也yě yě 未wèi wèi 发放fā fàng fā fàng 任何rèn hé rèn hé 含有hán yǒu hán yǒu 大麻dà má dà má 成分chéng fèn chéng fèn 药物yào wù yào wù 的de de 生产shēng chǎn shēng chǎn 许可证xǔ kě zhèng xǔ kě zhèng "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
This provides context for the caution exercised.
 卫生部长wèi shēng bù zhǎng wèi shēng bù zhǎng GregGreg Greg HuntHunt Hunt 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 他tā tā 将jiāng jiāng 批量pī liàng pī liàng 进口jìn kǒu jìn kǒu 医用yī yòng yī yòng 大麻dà má dà má 以yǐ yǐ 解决jiě jué jiě jué 供应gōng yìng gōng yìng 短缺duǎn quē duǎn quē 问题wèn tí wèn tí [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 55 5 .. . 医疗界yī liáo jiè yī liáo jiè 对duì duì 安全性ān quán xìng ān quán xìng 存在cún zài cún zài 担忧dān yōu dān yōu ** * ** *
儿童ér tóng ér tóng 癫痫diān xián diān xián 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā DrDr Dr JohnJohn John LawsonLawson Lawson 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 担忧dān yōu dān yōu ，， ， "" " 病患bìng huàn bìng huàn 和hé hé 绝望jué wàng jué wàng 的de de 人rén rén 被bèi bèi 告知gào zhī gào zhī 医用yī yòng yī yòng 大麻dà má dà má 是shì shì 万能wàn néng wàn néng 药yào yào "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 医学yī xué yī xué 协会xié huì xié huì 也yě yě 表示同意biǎo shì tóng yì biǎo shì tóng yì ，， ， 称chēng chēng "" " 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 它tā tā 将jiāng jiāng 成为chéng wéi chéng wéi 各种gè zhǒng gè zhǒng 疼痛téng tòng téng tòng 和hé hé 其他qí tā qí tā 问题wèn tí wèn tí 的de de 绝妙jué miào jué miào 解决方案jiě jué fāng àn jiě jué fāng àn 还hái hái 为时过早wéi shí guò zǎo wéi shí guò zǎo "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
这为zhè wèi zhè wèi 所suǒ suǒ 采取cǎi qǔ cǎi qǔ 的de de 谨慎jǐn shèn jǐn shèn 态度tài dù tài dù 提供tí gōng tí gōng 了le le 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 。。 。

来源可信度评估

** * ** * 提供tí gōng tí gōng 的de de 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán ：： ： ** * ** *
**Original Sources Provided:** 1. **BuzzFeed News (Australian edition)** - Brad Esposito and Alice Workman, 11 May 2017 [1] - BuzzFeed is a mainstream digital news organization - The article's framing is clearly sympathetic to patients seeking faster access ("The Government Has Voted To Make Sick People Wait Longer") - However, the factual reporting appears accurate - the vote counts are correct, the timing is accurate, and quotes are properly attributed - BuzzFeed does not have a systematic left-wing bias but does tend toward sympathetic coverage of social issues - The headline is emotionally loaded ("make sick people wait longer") but the substance is factual 2. **ABC Hack (ABC Triple J)** - 1 March 2017 [2] - ABC is Australia's national public broadcaster, generally considered a credible mainstream news source - The reporting is more balanced than BuzzFeed, presenting multiple perspectives including medical concerns and supply chain issues - The article presents both criticisms of the process AND legitimate medical concerns about premature claims - This is investigative journalism that appears thorough and well-sourced **Overall Assessment:** Both sources are mainstream and credible.
 11 1 .. . ** * ** * BuzzFeedBuzzFeed BuzzFeed NewsNews News (( ( 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 版bǎn bǎn )) ) ** * ** * -- - BradBrad Brad EspositoEsposito Esposito 和hé hé AliceAlice Alice WorkmanWorkman Workman ，， ， 20172017 2017 年nián nián 55 5 月yuè yuè 1111 11 日rì rì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The BuzzFeed article is more emotionally framed but factually accurate.
 -- - BuzzFeedBuzzFeed BuzzFeed 是shì shì 一家yī jiā yī jiā 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 数字shù zì shù zì 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 机构jī gòu jī gòu
The ABC article is more balanced and provides better context about the complexity of the issue.
 -- - 该gāi gāi 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 的de de 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 明显míng xiǎn míng xiǎn 同情tóng qíng tóng qíng 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 更gèng gèng 快kuài kuài 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ 途径tú jìng tú jìng 的de de 患者huàn zhě huàn zhě （（ （ "" " 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 投票tóu piào tóu piào 让ràng ràng 病患bìng huàn bìng huàn 等待děng dài děng dài 更gèng gèng 长时间zhǎng shí jiān zhǎng shí jiān "" " ）） ）
-- - 然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， 事实shì shí shì shí 报道bào dào bào dào 似乎sì hū sì hū 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què —— — —— — 投票数tóu piào shù tóu piào shù 正确zhèng què zhèng què 、、 、 时间shí jiān shí jiān 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 、、 、 引述yǐn shù yǐn shù 得当dé dàng dé dàng
-- - BuzzFeedBuzzFeed BuzzFeed 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 的de de 左翼zuǒ yì zuǒ yì 偏见piān jiàn piān jiàn ，， ， 但dàn dàn 确实què shí què shí 倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng 于yú yú 对duì duì 社会shè huì shè huì 问题wèn tí wèn tí 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 同情tóng qíng tóng qíng 性xìng xìng 报道bào dào bào dào
-- - 标题biāo tí biāo tí 带有dài yǒu dài yǒu 情感qíng gǎn qíng gǎn 色彩sè cǎi sè cǎi （（ （ "" " 让ràng ràng 病患bìng huàn bìng huàn 等待děng dài děng dài 更gèng gèng 长时间zhǎng shí jiān zhǎng shí jiān "" " ）） ） ，， ， 但dàn dàn 实质shí zhì shí zhì 内容nèi róng nèi róng 属实shǔ shí shǔ shí
22 2 .. . ** * ** * ABCABC ABC HackHack Hack (( ( ABCABC ABC TripleTriple Triple JJ J )) ) ** * ** * -- - 20172017 2017 年nián nián 33 3 月yuè yuè 11 1 日rì rì [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
-- - ABCABC ABC 是shì shì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 国家guó jiā guó jiā 公共广播gōng gòng guǎng bō gōng gòng guǎng bō 公司gōng sī gōng sī ，， ， 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 被bèi bèi 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 是shì shì 可信kě xìn kě xìn 的de de 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 新闻来源xīn wén lái yuán xīn wén lái yuán
-- - 报道bào dào bào dào 比bǐ bǐ BuzzFeedBuzzFeed BuzzFeed 更gèng gèng 平衡píng héng píng héng ，， ， 呈现chéng xiàn chéng xiàn 了le le 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 担忧dān yōu dān yōu 和hé hé 供应链gōng yìng liàn gōng yìng liàn 问题wèn tí wèn tí 在内zài nèi zài nèi 的de de 多种duō zhǒng duō zhǒng 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn
-- - 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 既jì jì 提出tí chū tí chū 了le le 对duì duì 流程liú chéng liú chéng 的de de 批评pī píng pī píng ，， ， 也yě yě 提出tí chū tí chū 了le le 关于guān yú guān yú 过早guò zǎo guò zǎo 声明shēng míng shēng míng 的de de 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 担忧dān yōu dān yōu
-- - 这是zhè shì zhè shì 调查diào chá diào chá 性xìng xìng 新闻报道xīn wén bào dào xīn wén bào dào ，， ， 看起来kàn qǐ lái kàn qǐ lái 详尽xiáng jìn xiáng jìn 且qiě qiě 来源lái yuán lái yuán 可靠kě kào kě kào
** * ** * 总体zǒng tǐ zǒng tǐ 评估píng gū píng gū ：： ： ** * ** * 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 来源lái yuán lái yuán 都dōu dōu 是shì shì 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 且qiě qiě 可信kě xìn kě xìn 的de de 。。 。
BuzzFeedBuzzFeed BuzzFeed 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 更具gèng jù gèng jù 情感qíng gǎn qíng gǎn 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 但dàn dàn 事实shì shí shì shí 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 。。 。
ABCABC ABC 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 更gèng gèng 平衡píng héng píng héng ，， ， 提供tí gōng tí gōng 了le le 关于guān yú guān yú 问题wèn tí wèn tí 复杂性fù zá xìng fù zá xìng 的de de 更好gèng hǎo gèng hǎo 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 。。 。
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做过zuò guò zuò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng ？？ ？
**Did Labor do something similar?** Search conducted: "Labor government medicinal cannabis policy wait times approval" According to the BuzzFeed article, "The Labor Party supported the motion, as did David Leyonhjelm and Derryn Hinch" [1].
 ** * ** *
This indicates Labor's position on this specific 2017 vote was supportive of faster access.
 搜索sōu suǒ sōu suǒ 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng ：： ： "" " LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 医用yī yòng yī yòng 大麻dà má dà má 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 等待时间děng dài shí jiān děng dài shí jiān 审批shěn pī shěn pī "" "
However, medicinal cannabis was only legalised in late 2016 (under the Coalition government), so there is no direct Labor precedent in government for how they would have managed the approval process if they had been in power at that time.
 根据gēn jù gēn jù BuzzFeedBuzzFeed BuzzFeed 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng ，， ， "" " LaborLabor Labor 党dǎng dǎng 支持zhī chí zhī chí 该gāi gāi 动议dòng yì dòng yì ，， ， DavidDavid David LeyonhjelmLeyonhjelm Leyonhjelm 和hé hé DerrynDerryn Derryn HinchHinch Hinch 也yě yě 投tóu tóu 了le le 赞成票zàn chéng piào zàn chéng piào "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The broader context: Labor supported the Greens' amendment in 2017 when given the opportunity, suggesting they would have preferred the faster access process.
 这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng LaborLabor Labor 在zài zài 20172017 2017 年nián nián 这次zhè cì zhè cì 特定tè dìng tè dìng 投票tóu piào tóu piào 中zhōng zhōng 的de de 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 是shì shì 支持zhī chí zhī chí 更gèng gèng 快kuài kuài 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ 途径tú jìng tú jìng 的de de 。。 。
But since medicinal cannabis policy is recent (post-2016), there is no historical Labor comparison available.
 然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， 医用yī yòng yī yòng 大麻dà má dà má 直到zhí dào zhí dào 20162016 2016 年底nián dǐ nián dǐ 才cái cái 合法化hé fǎ huà hé fǎ huà （（ （ 在zài zài CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 期间qī jiān qī jiān ）） ） ，， ， 因此yīn cǐ yīn cǐ 如果rú guǒ rú guǒ LaborLabor Labor 当时dāng shí dāng shí 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng ，， ， 他们tā men tā men 将jiāng jiāng 如何rú hé rú hé 管理guǎn lǐ guǎn lǐ 审批shěn pī shěn pī 流程liú chéng liú chéng ，， ， 尚无shàng wú shàng wú 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 先例xiān lì xiān lì 。。 。
更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ：： ： LaborLabor Labor 在zài zài 20172017 2017 年nián nián 获得huò dé huò dé 机会jī huì jī huì 时shí shí 支持zhī chí zhī chí 了le le GreensGreens Greens 的de de 修正案xiū zhèng àn xiū zhèng àn ，， ， 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 他们tā men tā men 更gèng gèng 倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng 于yú yú 快速kuài sù kuài sù 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ 流程liú chéng liú chéng 。。 。
但dàn dàn 由于yóu yú yóu yú 医用yī yòng yī yòng 大麻dà má dà má 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 是shì shì 近期jìn qī jìn qī 的de de 事shì shì （（ （ 20162016 2016 年nián nián 后hòu hòu ）） ） ，， ， 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 可kě kě 供gōng gōng 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào 的de de 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ LaborLabor Labor 案例àn lì àn lì 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

** * ** * CoalitionCoalition Coalition 可能kě néng kě néng 投票tóu piào tóu piào 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 该gāi gāi 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 的de de 原因yuán yīn yuán yīn （（ （ 超越chāo yuè chāo yuè 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 分歧fēn qí fēn qí ）） ） ：： ： ** * ** *
**Why the Coalition may have voted against the bill (beyond partisan disagreement):** While the claim frames this purely as the Coalition "voted against changes," there were several legitimate policy considerations: 1. **Safety and Oversight Concerns** - The reason the Coalition removed Category A access in the first place was to ensure "appropriate level of oversight" [1].
 虽然suī rán suī rán 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 将jiāng jiāng 其qí qí 纯粹chún cuì chún cuì 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 为wèi wèi CoalitionCoalition Coalition "" " 投票tóu piào tóu piào 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé "" " ，， ， 但dàn dàn 存在cún zài cún zài 若干ruò gān ruò gān 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 考量kǎo liáng kǎo liáng ：： ：
The Greens' amendment would have fast-tracked access specifically for terminally ill patients, arguably reducing that oversight for a vulnerable population desperate for treatment. 2. **Medical Establishment Caution** - The Australian Medical Association considered the approval process "heavily laden with red tape and not all that easy to navigate" [2], but simultaneously expressed concern that "sick and desperate people are being told that medical cannabis is a cure all" [2].
 11 1 .. . ** * ** * 安全ān quán ān quán 和hé hé 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 担忧dān yōu dān yōu ** * ** * -- - CoalitionCoalition Coalition 最初zuì chū zuì chū 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo CategoryCategory Category AA A 通道tōng dào tōng dào 的de de 原因yuán yīn yuán yīn 是shì shì 为了wèi le wèi le 确保què bǎo què bǎo "" " 适当shì dàng shì dàng 的de de 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 水平shuǐ píng shuǐ píng "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
This suggests the issue was more complex than simply "reduce bureaucracy." The medical establishment wanted both better access AND appropriate caution. 3. **Supply Chain Limitations** - At the time of the vote in May 2017, local production of medicinal cannabis had still not begun [2].
 GreensGreens Greens 的de de 修正案xiū zhèng àn xiū zhèng àn 本来běn lái běn lái 会为huì wèi huì wèi 临终lín zhōng lín zhōng 病患bìng huàn bìng huàn 快速kuài sù kuài sù 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ 途径tú jìng tú jìng ，， ， 这zhè zhè 可能kě néng kě néng 会huì huì 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 对duì duì 一个yí gè yí gè 绝望jué wàng jué wàng 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 治疗zhì liáo zhì liáo 的de de 脆弱cuì ruò cuì ruò 群体qún tǐ qún tǐ 的de de 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 。。 。
Fast-tracking approvals when there was no domestic supply would not necessarily have reduced wait times anyway, as supplies would still need to be imported from overseas. 4. **Reasonable Disagreement** - Senators from One Nation and the Nick Xenophon Team voted against the bill, not out of Coalition loyalty but out of what some characterized as genuine policy disagreement (though others, like Richard Di Natale, called them "heartless"). **The Broader Context:** The claim presents a straightforward narrative of callous indifference.
 22 2 .. . ** * ** * 医疗界yī liáo jiè yī liáo jiè 的de de 谨慎jǐn shèn jǐn shèn 态度tài dù tài dù ** * ** * -- - 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 医学yī xué yī xué 协会xié huì xié huì 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 审批shěn pī shěn pī 流程liú chéng liú chéng "" " 充满chōng mǎn chōng mǎn 繁文缛节fán wén rù jié fán wén rù jié ，， ， 不太bù tài bù tài 容易róng yì róng yì 操作cāo zuò cāo zuò "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] ，， ， 但dàn dàn 同时tóng shí tóng shí 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 担忧dān yōu dān yōu "" " 病患bìng huàn bìng huàn 和hé hé 绝望jué wàng jué wàng 的de de 人rén rén 被bèi bèi 告知gào zhī gào zhī 医用yī yòng yī yòng 大麻dà má dà má 是shì shì 万能wàn néng wàn néng 药yào yào "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The reality is more complex: - The Coalition had legalised medicinal cannabis in 2016 (a significant policy shift) [1][2] - The Coalition deliberately restricted access initially due to oversight concerns [1] - The 19-month wait times were a real problem, but occurred under a policy the Coalition itself had created - When the Greens proposed reverting to faster access, the Coalition voted against it, but for reasons beyond simple indifference (safety concerns, supply chain realities, medical establishment caution) - The Labor Party, when given the opportunity, supported faster access, but had not governed on this issue historically **Fair Assessment:** This claim is TRUE in its basic facts - the Coalition did vote against reducing wait times from months to hours - but it is MISLEADING in its framing.
 这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 问题wèn tí wèn tí 比bǐ bǐ "" " 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 官僚主义guān liáo zhǔ yì guān liáo zhǔ yì "" " 更gèng gèng 复杂fù zá fù zá 。。 。
It presents a partisan vote as simple callousness when the issue involved legitimate policy disagreements about safety, oversight, and medical evidence.
 医疗界yī liáo jiè yī liáo jiè 既jì jì 希望xī wàng xī wàng 获得huò dé huò dé 更好gèng hǎo gèng hǎo 的de de 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ 途径tú jìng tú jìng ，， ， 也yě yě 希望xī wàng xī wàng 有yǒu yǒu 适当shì dàng shì dàng 的de de 谨慎jǐn shèn jǐn shèn 。。 。
The claim also obscures that the Coalition had created the slow process in the first place by restricting Category A access in 2016.
 33 3 .. . ** * ** * 供应链gōng yìng liàn gōng yìng liàn 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì ** * ** * -- - 在zài zài 20172017 2017 年nián nián 55 5 月yuè yuè 投票tóu piào tóu piào 时shí shí ，， ， 本地běn dì běn dì 医用yī yòng yī yòng 大麻dà má dà má 生产shēng chǎn shēng chǎn 尚未shàng wèi shàng wèi 开始kāi shǐ kāi shǐ [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
在zài zài 本地běn dì běn dì 供应gōng yìng gōng yìng 不足bù zú bù zú 的de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 下xià xià 快速kuài sù kuài sù 审批shěn pī shěn pī 并不一定bìng bù yí dìng bìng bù yí dìng 能够néng gòu néng gòu 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 等待时间děng dài shí jiān děng dài shí jiān ，， ， 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi 供应gōng yìng gōng yìng 仍réng réng 需要xū yào xū yào 从cóng cóng 海外hǎi wài hǎi wài 进口jìn kǒu jìn kǒu 。。 。
44 4 .. . ** * ** * 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 的de de 分歧fēn qí fēn qí ** * ** * -- - OneOne One NationNation Nation 和hé hé NickNick Nick XenophonXenophon Xenophon TeamTeam Team 的de de 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán 投票tóu piào tóu piào 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 该gāi gāi 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn ，， ， 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 出于chū yú chū yú 对duì duì CoalitionCoalition Coalition 的de de 忠诚zhōng chéng zhōng chéng ，， ， 而是ér shì ér shì 出于chū yú chū yú 被bèi bèi 某些mǒu xiē mǒu xiē 人rén rén 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为wèi wèi 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 分歧fēn qí fēn qí （（ （ 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 其他人qí tā rén qí tā rén ，， ， 如rú rú RichardRichard Richard DiDi Di NataleNatale Natale ，， ， 称chēng chēng 他们tā men tā men "" " 无情wú qíng wú qíng "" " ）） ） 。。 。
** * ** * 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ：： ： ** * ** *
该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 呈现chéng xiàn chéng xiàn 了le le 一个yí gè yí gè 简单jiǎn dān jiǎn dān 的de de 漠视mò shì mò shì 叙事xù shì xù shì 。。 。
现实xiàn shí xiàn shí 更为gèng wéi gèng wéi 复杂fù zá fù zá ：： ：
-- - CoalitionCoalition Coalition 于yú yú 20162016 2016 年nián nián 将jiāng jiāng 医用yī yòng yī yòng 大麻dà má dà má 合法化hé fǎ huà hé fǎ huà （（ （ 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 转变zhuǎn biàn zhuǎn biàn ）） ） [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
-- - CoalitionCoalition Coalition 最初zuì chū zuì chū 出于chū yú chū yú 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 担忧dān yōu dān yōu 故意gù yì gù yì 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 了le le 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ 途径tú jìng tú jìng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
-- - 1919 19 个gè gè 月yuè yuè 的de de 等待时间děng dài shí jiān děng dài shí jiān 是shì shì 一个yí gè yí gè 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 的de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí ，， ， 但dàn dàn 发生fā shēng fā shēng 在zài zài CoalitionCoalition Coalition 自己zì jǐ zì jǐ 制定zhì dìng zhì dìng 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 下xià xià
-- - 当dāng dāng GreensGreens Greens 提议tí yì tí yì 恢复huī fù huī fù 更gèng gèng 快kuài kuài 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ 途径tú jìng tú jìng 时shí shí ，， ， CoalitionCoalition Coalition 投票tóu piào tóu piào 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì ，， ， 但dàn dàn 原因yuán yīn yuán yīn 超越chāo yuè chāo yuè 简单jiǎn dān jiǎn dān 的de de 漠视mò shì mò shì （（ （ 安全ān quán ān quán 担忧dān yōu dān yōu 、、 、 供应链gōng yìng liàn gōng yìng liàn 现实xiàn shí xiàn shí 、、 、 医疗界yī liáo jiè yī liáo jiè 的de de 谨慎jǐn shèn jǐn shèn ）） ）
-- - LaborLabor Labor 党dǎng dǎng 在zài zài 获得huò dé huò dé 机会jī huì jī huì 时shí shí 支持zhī chí zhī chí 了le le 更gèng gèng 快kuài kuài 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ 途径tú jìng tú jìng ，， ， 但dàn dàn 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ 上shàng shàng 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 处理chǔ lǐ chǔ lǐ 过guò guò 这个zhè ge zhè ge 问题wèn tí wèn tí
** * ** * 公正gōng zhèng gōng zhèng 评估píng gū píng gū ：： ： ** * ** * 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 在zài zài 其qí qí 基本jī běn jī běn 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng 是shì shì 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 的de de —— — —— — CoalitionCoalition Coalition 确实què shí què shí 投票tóu piào tóu piào 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 将jiāng jiāng 等待时间děng dài shí jiān děng dài shí jiān 从cóng cóng 数月shù yuè shù yuè 缩短suō duǎn suō duǎn 至数zhì shù zhì shù 小时xiǎo shí xiǎo shí —— — —— — 但dàn dàn 在zài zài 其qí qí 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 上shàng shàng 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng 。。 。
它tā tā 将jiāng jiāng 一次yī cì yī cì 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 投票tóu piào tóu piào 呈现chéng xiàn chéng xiàn 为wèi wèi 简单jiǎn dān jiǎn dān 的de de 冷酷无情lěng kù wú qíng lěng kù wú qíng ，， ， 而ér ér 问题wèn tí wèn tí 涉及shè jí shè jí 关于guān yú guān yú 安全ān quán ān quán 、、 、 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 和hé hé 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 的de de 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 分歧fēn qí fēn qí 。。 。
该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 还hái hái 掩盖yǎn gài yǎn gài 了le le CoalitionCoalition Coalition 在zài zài 20162016 2016 年nián nián 通过tōng guò tōng guò 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì CategoryCategory Category AA A 通道tōng dào tōng dào 而ér ér 创造chuàng zào chuàng zào 了le le 这zhè zhè 一yī yī 缓慢huǎn màn huǎn màn 流程liú chéng liú chéng 的de de 事实shì shí shì shí 。。 。

部分属实

6.0

/ 10

事实shì shí shì shí 核心hé xīn hé xīn 是shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de ：： ： CoalitionCoalition Coalition 确实què shí què shí 在zài zài 20172017 2017 年nián nián 55 5 月yuè yuè 投票tóu piào tóu piào 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì GreensGreens Greens 的de de 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn ，， ， 该gāi gāi 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 本běn běn 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ 将jiāng jiāng 医用yī yòng yī yòng 大麻dà má dà má 的de de 等待时间děng dài shí jiān děng dài shí jiān 从cóng cóng 数月shù yuè shù yuè 缩短suō duǎn suō duǎn 至数zhì shù zhì shù 小时xiǎo shí xiǎo shí ，， ， 且qiě qiě 1919 19 个gè gè 月yuè yuè 等待时间děng dài shí jiān děng dài shí jiān 的de de 例子lì zi lì zi 有yǒu yǒu 文献wén xiàn wén xiàn 记录jì lù jì lù 。。 。
The factual core is accurate: the Coalition did vote against a Greens bill in May 2017 that would have reduced medicinal cannabis wait times from months to hours, and the 19-month wait time example is documented.
 然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng ，， ， 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi ：： ：
However, the claim is misleading because it: 1.
 11 1 .. . 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le CoalitionCoalition Coalition 在zài zài 20162016 2016 年nián nián 故意gù yì gù yì 通过tōng guò tōng guò 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo CategoryCategory Category AA A 通道tōng dào tōng dào 创造chuàng zào chuàng zào 了le le 这zhè zhè 一yī yī 缓慢huǎn màn huǎn màn 流程liú chéng liú chéng 的de de 事实shì shí shì shí
Omits that the Coalition had deliberately created the slow process by removing Category A access in 2016 2.
 22 2 .. . 将jiāng jiāng 投票tóu piào tóu piào 呈现chéng xiàn chéng xiàn 为wèi wèi 简单jiǎn dān jiǎn dān 的de de 冷酷无情lěng kù wú qíng lěng kù wú qíng ，， ， 而ér ér 问题wèn tí wèn tí 涉及shè jí shè jí 关于guān yú guān yú 安全ān quán ān quán 、、 、 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 和hé hé 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 谨慎jǐn shèn jǐn shèn 的de de 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 分歧fēn qí fēn qí
Presents the vote as simple callousness when it involved legitimate policy disagreements about safety, oversight, and medical caution 3.
 33 3 .. . 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn 即使jí shǐ jí shǐ 快速kuài sù kuài sù 审批shěn pī shěn pī 也yě yě 无法wú fǎ wú fǎ 解决jiě jué jiě jué 20172017 2017 年nián nián 55 5 月yuè yuè 存在cún zài cún zài 的de de 供应链gōng yìng liàn gōng yìng liàn 问题wèn tí wèn tí
Does not acknowledge that even fast-tracking approvals wouldn't have solved supply chain problems that existed in May 2017 4.
 44 4 .. . 将jiāng jiāng 问题wèn tí wèn tí 纯粹chún cuì chún cuì 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 为wèi wèi 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 之争zhī zhēng zhī zhēng ，， ， 而ér ér 医疗界yī liáo jiè yī liáo jiè 本身běn shēn běn shēn 已yǐ yǐ 对duì duì 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 药物yào wù yào wù 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 过guò guò 谨慎jǐn shèn jǐn shèn
Frames the issue as purely partisan when the medical establishment itself had expressed caution about the medications The claim is factually correct but contextually incomplete and potentially misleading about the Coalition's motivations.
 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 在zài zài 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng 正确zhèng què zhèng què ，， ， 但dàn dàn 在zài zài 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 上shàng shàng 不bù bù 完整wán zhěng wán zhěng ，， ， 并bìng bìng 可能kě néng kě néng 对duì duì CoalitionCoalition Coalition 的de de 动机dòng jī dòng jī 产生chǎn shēng chǎn shēng 误导wù dǎo wù dǎo 。。 。

📚 来源与引用 (2)

  1. 1
    The Government Has Voted To Make Sick People Wait Longer For Medicinal Cannabis

    The Government Has Voted To Make Sick People Wait Longer For Medicinal Cannabis

    A bill introduced by the Greens would have allowed terminally ill patients access to fast-tracked medicinal cannabis, but it was voted down on Thursday afternoon.

    BuzzFeed
  2. 2
    Medical cannabis process still "heavily laden with red tape" and hard to navigate: AMA

    Medical cannabis process still "heavily laden with red tape" and hard to navigate: AMA

    It’s been a year since the then-health minister Sussan Ley declared she’d delivered the “missing piece” for sick Australians wanting to use medical cannabis.

    triple j

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性，但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。

Previous: C0362 Next: C0364