部分属实

评分: 7.0/10

Coalition
C0288

声明内容

“花费32万澳元用于法律诉讼,拒绝将寻求庇护者紧急转运至本土治疗危及生命的疾病。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis
分析时间: 30 Jan 2026

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 在zài zài 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 上shàng shàng 为wèi wèi 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 庇护bì hù bì hù 者zhě zhě 和hé hé 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 提出tí chū tí chū 的de de 紧急jǐn jí jǐn jí 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 转运zhuǎn yùn zhuǎn yùn 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng 辩护biàn hù biàn hù 时shí shí 产生chǎn shēng chǎn shēng 了le le 大量dà liàng dà liàng 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The Coalition government did incur substantial legal costs defending court cases brought by asylum seekers and advocacy organizations seeking emergency medical transfers from offshore detention facilities [1].
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 中zhōng zhōng 的de de 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 金额jīn é jīn é 需要xū yào xū yào 澄清chéng qīng chéng qīng 。。 。
However, the specific figure in the claim requires clarification.
《《 《 卫报wèi bào wèi bào 》》 》 20182018 2018 年nián nián 99 9 月yuè yuè 的de de 报道bào dào bào dào 记录jì lù jì lù 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì ,, , 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 花费huā fèi huā fèi 约yuē yuē ** * ** * 27.527.5 27.5 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán ** * ** * (( ( 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 3232 32 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán )) ) 用于yòng yú yòng yú 对抗duì kàng duì kàng 来自lái zì lái zì 瑙鲁nǎo lǔ nǎo lǔ 和hé hé 马努斯mǎ nǔ sī mǎ nǔ sī 岛dǎo dǎo 的de de 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 庇护bì hù bì hù 者zhě zhě 紧急jǐn jí jǐn jí 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 转运zhuǎn yùn zhuǎn yùn 请求qǐng qiú qǐng qiú [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The Guardian's September 2018 reporting documented that Australia had spent approximately **$275,000** (not $320,000) fighting requests for urgent medical transfers of asylum seekers from Nauru and Manus Island [1].
这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 支出zhī chū zhī chū 与yǔ yǔ 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 中zhōng zhōng 辩护biàn hù biàn hù 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 拒绝jù jué jù jué 或huò huò 延迟yán chí yán chí 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 撤离chè lí chè lí 决定jué dìng jué dìng 的de de 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 相关xiāng guān xiāng guān [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
This spending was directly related to legal costs incurred in the Federal Court defending government decisions to deny or delay medical evacuations [2].
这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng 的de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 至关重要zhì guān zhòng yào zhì guān zhòng yào :: : 根据gēn jù gēn jù CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 离岸lí àn lí àn 拘留jū liú jū liú 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè ,, , 瑙鲁nǎo lǔ nǎo lǔ 和hé hé 马努斯mǎ nǔ sī mǎ nǔ sī 岛上dǎo shàng dǎo shàng 的de de 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 庇护bì hù bì hù 者zhě zhě 必须bì xū bì xū 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 命令mìng lìng mìng lìng 才能cái néng cái néng 获得huò dé huò dé 紧急jǐn jí jǐn jí 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 转运zhuǎn yùn zhuǎn yùn [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
The context for these legal costs is crucial: under the Coalition government's offshore detention policy, asylum seekers on Nauru and Manus Island had to seek court orders to obtain emergency medical transfers [3].
当dāng dāng 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 转运zhuǎn yùn zhuǎn yùn 请求qǐng qiú qǐng qiú 被bèi bèi 拒绝jù jué jù jué 时shí shí ,, , 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 团体tuán tǐ tuán tǐ 和hé hé 律师lǜ shī lǜ shī 向xiàng xiàng 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 提起tí qǐ tí qǐ 诉讼sù sòng sù sòng ,, , 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 决定jué dìng jué dìng 。。 。
When medical transfer requests were denied, advocacy groups and lawyers filed Federal Court cases to challenge the government's decisions.
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 雇佣gù yōng gù yōng 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 团队tuán duì tuán duì 为wèi wèi 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 决定jué dìng jué dìng 在zài zài 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 上shàng shàng 辩护biàn hù biàn hù —— — —— — 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 由yóu yóu 纳税人nà shuì rén nà shuì rén 承担chéng dān chéng dān [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The government employed legal teams to defend these decisions in court—costs that ultimately fell to taxpayers [2].
在zài zài 20162016 2016 年nián nián 至zhì zhì 20192019 2019 年间nián jiān nián jiān ,, , 即jí jí 20192019 2019 年nián nián 22 2 月yuè yuè MedevacMedevac Medevac 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 通过tōng guò tōng guò 前qián qián ,, , 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng 成为chéng wéi chéng wéi 获得huò dé huò dé 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 转运zhuǎn yùn zhuǎn yùn 的de de 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 机制jī zhì jī zhì [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
Between 2016 and 2019, before the Medevac Bill passed in February 2019, the legal system became the primary mechanism through which medical transfers were secured [4].
医疗yī liáo yī liáo 案件àn jiàn àn jiàn 涉及shè jí shè jí 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 的de de 、、 、 危及wēi jí wēi jí 生命shēng mìng shēng mìng 的de de 疾病jí bìng jí bìng 。。 。
Medical cases involved serious, life-threatening conditions.
有yǒu yǒu 记录jì lù jì lù 的de de 案例àn lì àn lì 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò :: : 紧急jǐn jí jǐn jí 心脏xīn zàng xīn zàng 手术shǒu shù shǒu shù 、、 、 紧急jǐn jí jǐn jí 脑部nǎo bù nǎo bù 手术shǒu shù shǒu shù 、、 、 复杂fù zá fù zá 堕胎duò tāi duò tāi 护理hù lǐ hù lǐ 、、 、 紧急jǐn jí jǐn jí 精神jīng shén jīng shén 干预gān yù gān yù 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 癌症ái zhèng ái zhèng 和hé hé 其他qí tā qí tā 绝症jué zhèng jué zhèng 的de de 治疗zhì liáo zhì liáo [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
Documented cases include: emergency heart surgery, emergency brain surgery, complex abortion care, emergency psychiatric intervention, and treatment for cancers and other terminal conditions [3][4].
尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 有yǒu yǒu 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 转运zhuǎn yùn zhuǎn yùn ,, , 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 仍réng réng 反复fǎn fù fǎn fù 为wèi wèi 其qí qí 不bù bù 撤离chè lí chè lí 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 患者huàn zhě huàn zhě 的de de 决定jué dìng jué dìng 辩护biàn hù biàn hù [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
Despite medical recommendations for transfer, the government repeatedly defended its decisions not to evacuate these patients [2].

缺失背景

该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 虽然suī rán suī rán 基本jī běn jī běn 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què ,, , 但dàn dàn 省略shěng lüè shěng lüè 了le le 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 的de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 细节xì jié xì jié :: :
The claim, while substantially accurate, omits several important contextual details: **1.
** * ** * 11 1 .. . 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 声明shēng míng shēng míng 的de de 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu ** * ** *
Government's Stated Rationale** The Coalition government argued that adequate medical facilities existed on Nauru and Manus Island, making transfers unnecessary in most cases [5].
CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 辩称biàn chēng biàn chēng ,, , 瑙鲁nǎo lǔ nǎo lǔ 和hé hé 马努斯mǎ nǔ sī mǎ nǔ sī 岛上dǎo shàng dǎo shàng 有yǒu yǒu 足够zú gòu zú gòu 的de de 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 设施shè shī shè shī ,, , 在zài zài 大多数dà duō shù dà duō shù 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 下xià xià 无需wú xū wú xū 转运zhuǎn yùn zhuǎn yùn [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
Peter Dutton, Home Affairs Minister, maintained that the previous system had enabled over 900 asylum seekers to reach Australia for medical treatment under the offshore processing regime [5].
时任shí rèn shí rèn 内政部长nèi zhèng bù zhǎng nèi zhèng bù zhǎng PeterPeter Peter DuttonDutton Dutton 坚称jiān chēng jiān chēng ,, , 之前zhī qián zhī qián 的de de 制度zhì dù zhì dù 已使yǐ shǐ yǐ shǐ 900900 900 多名duō míng duō míng 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 庇护bì hù bì hù 者zhě zhě 在zài zài 离岸lí àn lí àn 处理chǔ lǐ chǔ lǐ 制度zhì dù zhì dù 下xià xià 获得huò dé huò dé 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 转运zhuǎn yùn zhuǎn yùn 至zhì zhì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 治疗zhì liáo zhì liáo [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
The government's position was that the medevac system created perverse incentives and was being "rorted" by false claims [5]. **2.
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 是shì shì ,, , 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 撤离chè lí chè lí 制度zhì dù zhì dù 造成zào chéng zào chéng 了le le 不bù bù 正当zhèng dāng zhèng dāng 激励jī lì jī lì ,, , 被bèi bèi 虚假xū jiǎ xū jiǎ 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng "" " 滥用làn yòng làn yòng "" " [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
Coroner's Findings Contradicted This** However, a coroner's inquest into the death of Hamid Khazaei—an Iranian asylum seeker on Manus Island—found his death was "preventable" and resulted from significant delays in medical transfer [6].
** * ** * 22 2 .. . 验尸官yàn shī guān yàn shī guān 的de de 调查结果diào chá jié guǒ diào chá jié guǒ 与yǔ yǔ 此cǐ cǐ 相xiāng xiāng 矛盾máo dùn máo dùn ** * ** *
Khazaei died from complications of an infected cut that was not treated adequately on Manus Island.
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 对duì duì HamidHamid Hamid KhazaeiKhazaei Khazaei 死亡sǐ wáng sǐ wáng 的de de 验尸yàn shī yàn shī 调查diào chá diào chá —— — —— — 他tā tā 是shì shì 马努斯mǎ nǔ sī mǎ nǔ sī 岛dǎo dǎo 的de de 一名yī míng yī míng 伊朗yī lǎng yī lǎng 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 庇护bì hù bì hù 者zhě zhě —— — —— — 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn 他tā tā 的de de 死亡sǐ wáng sǐ wáng 是shì shì "" " 可kě kě 预防yù fáng yù fáng 的de de "" " ,, , 是shì shì 由于yóu yú yóu yú 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 转运zhuǎn yùn zhuǎn yùn 的de de 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 延误yán wù yán wù 造成zào chéng zào chéng 的de de [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
This finding contradicted government claims about adequate medical facilities [6]. **3.
KhazaeiKhazaei Khazaei 死于sǐ yú sǐ yú 因yīn yīn 割伤gē shāng gē shāng 感染gǎn rǎn gǎn rǎn 引起yǐn qǐ yǐn qǐ 的de de 并发症bìng fā zhèng bìng fā zhèng ,, , 而ér ér 马努斯mǎ nǔ sī mǎ nǔ sī 岛上dǎo shàng dǎo shàng 的de de 治疗zhì liáo zhì liáo 不足bù zú bù zú 。。 。
Courts Consistently Overturned Government Decisions** The legal costs were incurred precisely because courts repeatedly ruled against the government's decisions to deny transfers [2].
这一zhè yī zhè yī 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn 与yǔ yǔ 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 关于guān yú guān yú 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 设施shè shī shè shī 充足chōng zú chōng zú 的de de 声明shēng míng shēng míng 相xiāng xiāng 矛盾máo dùn máo dùn [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
According to the Refugee Council of Australia and asylum sector analysts, the government "time and time again" had its decisions overturned by the Federal Court [3].
** * ** * 33 3 .. . 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 持续chí xù chí xù 推翻tuī fān tuī fān 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 决定jué dìng jué dìng ** * ** *
This suggests the government was defending decisions that courts consistently found to be inadequate or unlawful [3]. **4.
之所以zhī suǒ yǐ zhī suǒ yǐ 产生chǎn shēng chǎn shēng 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng ,, , 正是zhèng shì zhèng shì 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 反复fǎn fù fǎn fù 裁定cái dìng cái dìng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 拒绝jù jué jù jué 转运zhuǎn yùn zhuǎn yùn 的de de 决定jué dìng jué dìng 违法wéi fǎ wéi fǎ [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
Medevac Bill Response** The Medevac Bill, passed in February 2019 with cross-party support, was introduced specifically because the existing system was manifestly inadequate [4].
根据gēn jù gēn jù 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 难民nàn mín nàn mín 理事会lǐ shì huì lǐ shì huì 和hé hé 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 庇护bì hù bì hù 部门bù mén bù mén 分析师fēn xī shī fēn xī shī 的de de 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ ,, , 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ "" " 一次yī cì yī cì 又yòu yòu 一次yī cì yī cì "" " 被bèi bèi 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 推翻tuī fān tuī fān 决定jué dìng jué dìng [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
Parliament determined that government officials alone could not be trusted to make medical transfer decisions, requiring instead that doctors' recommendations be given substantial weight [4].
这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 正在zhèng zài zhèng zài 辩护biàn hù biàn hù 的de de 决定jué dìng jué dìng 被bèi bèi 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 一致yí zhì yí zhì 认定rèn dìng rèn dìng 为wèi wèi 不bù bù 充分chōng fèn chōng fèn 或huò huò 非法fēi fǎ fēi fǎ [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
This legislative response effectively acknowledged the inadequacy of the previous system [4]. **5.
** * ** * 44 4 .. . MedevacMedevac Medevac 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 的de de 回应huí yìng huí yìng ** * ** *
What the Legal Spending Actually Represented** The $275,000-$320,000 represented legal defense costs for the *government's position*, not costs for "denying" transfers in the sense of implementing a coherent policy.
20192019 2019 年nián nián 22 2 月yuè yuè 通过tōng guò tōng guò 的de de MedevacMedevac Medevac 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 获得huò dé huò dé 了le le 跨kuà kuà 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 支持zhī chí zhī chí ,, , 正是zhèng shì zhèng shì 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi 现有xiàn yǒu xiàn yǒu 制度zhì dù zhì dù 明显míng xiǎn míng xiǎn 不足bù zú bù zú [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
Rather, it was the cost of the government defending its denial decisions in court—a process that yielded significant government losses [2][3].
议会yì huì yì huì 认定rèn dìng rèn dìng ,, , 仅jǐn jǐn 由yóu yóu 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 官员guān yuán guān yuán 无法wú fǎ wú fǎ 被bèi bèi 信任xìn rèn xìn rèn 来lái lái 做出zuò chū zuò chū 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 转运zhuǎn yùn zhuǎn yùn 决定jué dìng jué dìng ,, , 而是ér shì ér shì 需要xū yào xū yào 给予jǐ yǔ jǐ yǔ 医生yī shēng yī shēng 的de de 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 相当xiāng dāng xiāng dāng 大dà dà 的de de 权重quán zhòng quán zhòng [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
Each case involved thousands of pages of supporting documentation, expert medical witnesses, and Federal Court hearings [2].
这一zhè yī zhè yī 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 回应huí yìng huí yìng 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn 了le le 之前zhī qián zhī qián 制度zhì dù zhì dù 的de de 不足bù zú bù zú [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 55 5 .. . 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 支出zhī chū zhī chū 实际shí jì shí jì 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 什么shén me shén me ** * ** *
27.527.5 27.5 万至wàn zhì wàn zhì 3232 32 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 的de de 是shì shì 为wèi wèi ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng ** * 辩护biàn hù biàn hù 的de de 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng ,, , 而ér ér 不是bú shì bú shì "" " 拒绝jù jué jù jué "" " 转运zhuǎn yùn zhuǎn yùn 的de de 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng (( ( 就jiù jiù 实施shí shī shí shī 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng 连贯lián guàn lián guàn 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 而言ér yán ér yán )) ) 。。 。
相反xiāng fǎn xiāng fǎn ,, , 这是zhè shì zhè shì 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 为wèi wèi 在zài zài 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 上shàng shàng 为wèi wèi 其qí qí 拒绝jù jué jù jué 决定jué dìng jué dìng 辩护biàn hù biàn hù 而ér ér 付出fù chū fù chū 的de de 成本chéng běn chéng běn —— — —— — 这一zhè yī zhè yī 过程guò chéng guò chéng 导致dǎo zhì dǎo zhì 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 多次duō cì duō cì 败诉bài sù bài sù [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
每个měi gè měi gè 案件àn jiàn àn jiàn 都dōu dōu 涉及shè jí shè jí 数千shù qiān shù qiān 页yè yè 的de de 支持zhī chí zhī chí 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 、、 、 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 医学yī xué yī xué 证人zhèng rén zhèng rén 和hé hé 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 听证会tīng zhèng huì tīng zhèng huì [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。

来源可信度评估

** * ** * 《《 《 卫报wèi bào wèi bào 》》 》 (( ( 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán )) ) ** * ** *
**The Guardian (Original Source)** The Guardian is a major international news organization with a strong reputation for investigative journalism and fact-based reporting [7].
《《 《 卫报wèi bào wèi bào 》》 》 是shì shì 一家yī jiā yī jiā 大型dà xíng dà xíng 国际guó jì guó jì 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 机构jī gòu jī gòu ,, , 以yǐ yǐ 调查diào chá diào chá 性xìng xìng 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 和hé hé 基于jī yú jī yú 事实shì shí shì shí 的de de 报道bào dào bào dào 而ér ér 享有盛誉xiǎng yǒu shèng yù xiǎng yǒu shèng yù [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。 。
The September 2018 article appears to be based on official information and court documentation, not speculation [1].
20182018 2018 年nián nián 99 9 月yuè yuè 的de de 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 似乎sì hū sì hū 基于jī yú jī yú 官方guān fāng guān fāng 信息xìn xī xìn xī 和hé hé 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 猜测cāi cè cāi cè [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The Guardian's reporting on Australian refugee policy has been extensively cited by parliamentary inquiries and academic researchers [8].
《《 《 卫报wèi bào wèi bào 》》 》 关于guān yú guān yú 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 难民nàn mín nàn mín 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 的de de 报道bào dào bào dào 已yǐ yǐ 被bèi bèi 议会yì huì yì huì 调查diào chá diào chá 和hé hé 学术研究xué shù yán jiū xué shù yán jiū 人员rén yuán rén yuán 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。 。
However, it should be noted that The Guardian has an editorial position on refugee policy that is generally critical of offshore detention, so the framing emphasizes the human suffering dimension rather than exploring government policy rationale [1][8].
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 应该yīng gāi yīng gāi 注意zhù yì zhù yì 的de de 是shì shì ,, , 《《 《 卫报wèi bào wèi bào 》》 》 在zài zài 难民nàn mín nàn mín 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 上shàng shàng 的de de 编辑biān jí biān jí 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 批评pī píng pī píng 离岸lí àn lí àn 拘留jū liú jū liú ,, , 因此yīn cǐ yīn cǐ 其qí qí 措辞cuò cí cuò cí 强调qiáng diào qiáng diào 人类rén lèi rén lèi 苦难kǔ nàn kǔ nàn 的de de 维度wéi dù wéi dù ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 探讨tàn tǎo tàn tǎo 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。 。
The reporting is factually accurate but reflects a particular perspective on the issue. **Figure Discrepancy** The exact figure varies slightly between reports: some sources reference $275,000, others $320,000 [1].
报道bào dào bào dào 在zài zài 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què ,, , 但dàn dàn 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 了le le 对duì duì 该gāi gāi 问题wèn tí wèn tí 的de de 特定tè dìng tè dìng 视角shì jiǎo shì jiǎo 。。 。
This may reflect different cost categories (direct legal costs vs. total administrative costs related to the cases) or rounding differences.
** * ** * 数字shù zì shù zì 差异chā yì chā yì ** * ** *
The Guardian's primary reporting cited approximately $275,000, though the headline references $320,000 [1].
具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 金额jīn é jīn é 在zài zài 不同bù tóng bù tóng 报道bào dào bào dào 中zhōng zhōng 略有lüè yǒu lüè yǒu 差异chā yì chā yì :: : 一些yī xiē yī xiē 来源lái yuán lái yuán 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 27.527.5 27.5 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán ,, , 另lìng lìng 一些yī xiē yī xiē 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 3232 32 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The discrepancy is relatively minor (about 16% difference) and does not undermine the core claim's accuracy [1].
这zhè zhè 可能kě néng kě néng 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 了le le 不同bù tóng bù tóng 的de de 成本chéng běn chéng běn 类别lèi bié lèi bié (( ( 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng 与yǔ yǔ 案件àn jiàn àn jiàn 相关xiāng guān xiāng guān 的de de 总zǒng zǒng 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng )) ) 或huò huò 四舍五入sì shě wǔ rù sì shě wǔ rù 的de de 差异chā yì chā yì 。。 。
《《 《 卫报wèi bào wèi bào 》》 》 的de de 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 报道bào dào bào dào 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 约yuē yuē 27.527.5 27.5 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán ,, , 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 标题biāo tí biāo tí 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 3232 32 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
差异chā yì chā yì 相对xiāng duì xiāng duì 较jiào jiào 小xiǎo xiǎo (( ( 约yuē yuē 16%16% 16% )) ) ,, , 并bìng bìng 不bù bù 破坏pò huài pò huài 核心hé xīn hé xīn 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 的de de 准确性zhǔn què xìng zhǔn què xìng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 有yǒu yǒu 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 转运zhuǎn yùn zhuǎn yùn 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè ?? ?
**Did Labor Have Similar Medical Transfer Policies?** Labor's position on medevac was more progressive than the Coalition's.
** * ** *
Labor supported the Medevac Bill when it was introduced in February 2019 and advocated for giving doctors stronger authority in transfer decisions [9].
工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 在zài zài 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 撤离chè lí chè lí 问题wèn tí wèn tí 上shàng shàng 的de de 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 比bǐ bǐ CoalitionCoalition Coalition 更gèng gèng 进步jìn bù jìn bù 。。 。
Penny Wong and other Labor senators argued for stronger protections for asylum seeker health [9].
工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 在zài zài 20192019 2019 年nián nián 22 2 月yuè yuè MedevacMedevac Medevac 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 提出tí chū tí chū 时shí shí 予以yǔ yǐ yǔ yǐ 支持zhī chí zhī chí ,, , 并bìng bìng 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 给予jǐ yǔ jǐ yǔ 医生yī shēng yī shēng 在zài zài 转运zhuǎn yùn zhuǎn yùn 决定jué dìng jué dìng 中zhōng zhōng 更gèng gèng 大dà dà 的de de 权力quán lì quán lì [[ [ 99 9 ]] ] 。。 。
However, Labor's current government (elected in 2022) has maintained Operation Sovereign Borders and continues offshore detention on Nauru [10].
PennyPenny Penny WongWong Wong 和hé hé 其他qí tā qí tā 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 为wèi wèi 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 庇护bì hù bì hù 者zhě zhě 的de de 健康jiàn kāng jiàn kāng 提供tí gōng tí gōng 更gèng gèng 强有力qiáng yǒu lì qiáng yǒu lì 的de de 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù [[ [ 99 9 ]] ] 。。 。
The Albanese Labor government has not materially changed the detention framework that created the need for legal medical transfer cases in the first place [10].
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 的de de 现任xiàn rèn xiàn rèn 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ (( ( 20222022 2022 年nián nián 当选dāng xuǎn dāng xuǎn )) ) 维持wéi chí wéi chí 了le le "" " 主权zhǔ quán zhǔ quán 边境biān jìng biān jìng 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng "" " ,, , 并bìng bìng 继续jì xù jì xù 在zài zài 瑙鲁nǎo lǔ nǎo lǔ 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 离岸lí àn lí àn 拘留jū liú jū liú [[ [ 1010 10 ]] ] 。。 。
So while Labor opposed the Coalition's specific approach, they have not dismantled offshore detention itself [10].
AlbaneseAlbanese Albanese 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 实质性shí zhì xìng shí zhì xìng 地dì dì 改变gǎi biàn gǎi biàn 当初dāng chū dāng chū 产生chǎn shēng chǎn shēng 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 转运zhuǎn yùn zhuǎn yùn 案件àn jiàn àn jiàn 需求xū qiú xū qiú 的de de 拘留jū liú jū liú 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià [[ [ 1010 10 ]] ] 。。 。
During Labor's 2007-2013 government under Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard, mandatory detention of asylum seekers was also in place, though Labor moved toward onshore processing [11].
因此yīn cǐ yīn cǐ ,, , 虽然suī rán suī rán 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì CoalitionCoalition Coalition 的de de 具体做法jù tǐ zuò fǎ jù tǐ zuò fǎ ,, , 但dàn dàn 他们tā men tā men 在zài zài 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 时shí shí 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi dismantledismantle dismantle 离岸lí àn lí àn 拘留jū liú jū liú 本身běn shēn běn shēn [[ [ 1010 10 ]] ] 。。 。
No direct equivalent to the Coalition's legal spending on fighting medical transfers occurred under Labor, as Labor's onshore focus reduced the need for medical evacuation from remote islands [11]. **Finding:** Labor opposed the Coalition's approach and advocated for reform, but has maintained the broader detention infrastructure when in power.
在zài zài 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 20072007 2007 -- - 20132013 2013 年nián nián KevinKevin Kevin RuddRudd Rudd 和hé hé JuliaJulia Julia GillardGillard Gillard 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 期间qī jiān qī jiān ,, , 对duì duì 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 庇护bì hù bì hù 者zhě zhě 的de de 强制qiáng zhì qiáng zhì 拘留jū liú jū liú 也yě yě 在zài zài 实施shí shī shí shī ,, , 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 转向zhuǎn xiàng zhuǎn xiàng 了le le 本土běn tǔ běn tǔ 处理chǔ lǐ chǔ lǐ [[ [ 1111 11 ]] ] 。。 。
Labor did not face equivalent legal challenges because their detention model (primarily onshore) did not create the same medical evacuation necessity [11].
工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 期间qī jiān qī jiān 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 发生fā shēng fā shēng 与yǔ yǔ CoalitionCoalition Coalition 在zài zài 对抗duì kàng duì kàng 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 转运zhuǎn yùn zhuǎn yùn 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 支出zhī chū zhī chū ,, , 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 的de de 本土běn tǔ běn tǔ 重点zhòng diǎn zhòng diǎn 模式mó shì mó shì 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 了le le 从cóng cóng 偏远piān yuǎn piān yuǎn 岛屿dǎo yǔ dǎo yǔ 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 撤离chè lí chè lí 的de de 必要性bì yào xìng bì yào xìng [[ [ 1111 11 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 调查结果diào chá jié guǒ diào chá jié guǒ :: : ** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì CoalitionCoalition Coalition 的de de 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ 并bìng bìng 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé ,, , 但dàn dàn 在zài zài 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 时shí shí 维持wéi chí wéi chí 了le le 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 拘留jū liú jū liú 基础设施jī chǔ shè shī jī chǔ shè shī 。。 。
工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 面临miàn lín miàn lín 同等tóng děng tóng děng 的de de 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn ,, , 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi 他们tā men tā men 的de de 拘留jū liú jū liú 模式mó shì mó shì (( ( 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 在zài zài 本土běn tǔ běn tǔ )) ) 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 产生chǎn shēng chǎn shēng 同样tóng yàng tóng yàng 的de de 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 撤离chè lí chè lí 必要性bì yào xìng bì yào xìng [[ [ 1111 11 ]] ] 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng ** * ** *
**The Government's Position** The Coalition argued it was implementing a border protection policy with strong public support [5].
CoalitionCoalition Coalition 辩称biàn chēng biàn chēng 他们tā men tā men 正在zhèng zài zhèng zài 实施shí shī shí shī 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng 获得huò dé huò dé 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng 强烈qiáng liè qiáng liè 支持zhī chí zhī chí 的de de 边境biān jìng biān jìng 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
The government maintained that: 1.
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 坚持jiān chí jiān chí 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi :: :
Adequate medical facilities existed on Nauru and Manus Island [5] 2.
11 1 .. . 瑙鲁nǎo lǔ nǎo lǔ 和hé hé 马努斯mǎ nǔ sī mǎ nǔ sī 岛上dǎo shàng dǎo shàng 有yǒu yǒu 足够zú gòu zú gòu 的de de 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 设施shè shī shè shī [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
The medevac process was being misused and asylum seekers were making false claims [5] 3.
22 2 .. . 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 撤离chè lí chè lí 程序chéng xù chéng xù 被bèi bèi 滥用làn yòng làn yòng ,, , 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 庇护bì hù bì hù 者zhě zhě 提出tí chū tí chū 虚假xū jiǎ xū jiǎ 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
Over 900 people had been medically transferred under the previous system [5] 4.
33 3 .. . 之前zhī qián zhī qián 的de de 制度zhì dù zhì dù 已使yǐ shǐ yǐ shǐ 900900 900 多人duō rén duō rén 获得huò dé huò dé 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 转运zhuǎn yùn zhuǎn yùn [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
Strong border control was necessary to prevent drownings at sea and smuggling [5] These were not inherently unreasonable policy positions—border protection and cost management are legitimate government concerns [5]. **Why This Failed** However, the coroner's findings and court outcomes suggest the government's claims about medical facilities were factually incorrect [6].
44 4 .. . 强有力qiáng yǒu lì qiáng yǒu lì 的de de 边境biān jìng biān jìng 控制kòng zhì kòng zhì 对于duì yú duì yú 防止fáng zhǐ fáng zhǐ 海上hǎi shàng hǎi shàng 溺亡nì wáng nì wáng 和hé hé 偷渡tōu dù tōu dù 是shì shì 必要bì yào bì yào 的de de [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
Multiple court losses indicate that government decisions were failing legal scrutiny [2][3].
这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 不合理bù hé lǐ bù hé lǐ 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng —— — —— — 边境biān jìng biān jìng 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 和hé hé 成本chéng běn chéng běn 管理guǎn lǐ guǎn lǐ 是shì shì 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 的de de 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 关切guān qiè guān qiè [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
Parliament's overwhelming passage of the Medevac Bill (with cross-party support) suggests even Coalition-leaning parliamentarians believed the system was inadequate [4]. **The Broader Context** This legal spending must be understood as symptomatic of a structural policy failure: the government had created a detention system on remote islands with inadequate medical facilities, then had to spend significant resources in court defending its reluctance to evacuate people with life-threatening conditions [2][3][4].
** * ** * 为什么wèi shén me wèi shén me 这zhè zhè 失败shī bài shī bài 了le le ** * ** *
The fact that courts consistently overturned these decisions suggests the government was not exercising sound judgment [2][3]. **Key Context:** The legal spending was not a feature of a successful policy, but rather a cost of defending a policy that the courts, coroners, and eventually Parliament determined was inadequate [2][3][4][6].
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 验尸官yàn shī guān yàn shī guān 的de de 调查结果diào chá jié guǒ diào chá jié guǒ 和hé hé 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 结果表明jié guǒ biǎo míng jié guǒ biǎo míng ,, , 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 关于guān yú guān yú 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 设施shè shī shè shī 的de de 声明shēng míng shēng míng 在zài zài 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng 是shì shì 错误cuò wù cuò wù 的de de [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
多次duō cì duō cì 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 败诉bài sù bài sù 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 决定jué dìng jué dìng 未能wèi néng wèi néng 通过tōng guò tōng guò 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 审查shěn chá shěn chá [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
MedevacMedevac Medevac 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 以yǐ yǐ 跨kuà kuà 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 支持zhī chí zhī chí 的de de 压倒性yā dǎo xìng yā dǎo xìng 通过tōng guò tōng guò ,, , 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 即使jí shǐ jí shǐ 是shì shì 倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng CoalitionCoalition Coalition 的de de 议员yì yuán yì yuán 也yě yě 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 该gāi gāi 制度zhì dù zhì dù 不足bù zú bù zú [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ** * ** *
必须bì xū bì xū 将jiāng jiāng 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 支出zhī chū zhī chū 理解lǐ jiě lǐ jiě 为wèi wèi 结构性jié gòu xìng jié gòu xìng 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 失败shī bài shī bài 的de de 症状zhèng zhuàng zhèng zhuàng :: : 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 偏远piān yuǎn piān yuǎn 岛屿dǎo yǔ dǎo yǔ 上shàng shàng 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì 了le le 一个yí gè yí gè 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 设施shè shī shè shī 不足bù zú bù zú 的de de 拘留jū liú jū liú 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng ,, , 然后rán hòu rán hòu 不得不bù dé bù bù dé bù 花费huā fèi huā fèi 大量dà liàng dà liàng 资源zī yuán zī yuán 在zài zài 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 上shàng shàng 为wèi wèi 其qí qí 不愿bù yuàn bù yuàn 撤离chè lí chè lí 危及wēi jí wēi jí 生命shēng mìng shēng mìng 的de de 患者huàn zhě huàn zhě 的de de 决定jué dìng jué dìng 辩护biàn hù biàn hù [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 持续chí xù chí xù 推翻tuī fān tuī fān 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 决定jué dìng jué dìng 的de de 事实shì shí shì shí 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 做出zuò chū zuò chū 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 的de de 判断pàn duàn pàn duàn [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng :: : ** * ** * 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 支出zhī chū zhī chū 不是bú shì bú shì 成功chéng gōng chéng gōng 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 的de de 特征tè zhēng tè zhēng ,, , 而是ér shì ér shì 为wèi wèi 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 、、 、 验尸官yàn shī guān yàn shī guān 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 议会yì huì yì huì 认定rèn dìng rèn dìng 不足bù zú bù zú 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 辩护biàn hù biàn hù 的de de 成本chéng běn chéng běn [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。

部分属实

7.0

/ 10

(( ( 需要xū yào xū yào 事实shì shí shì shí 澄清chéng qīng chéng qīng )) )
(with factual clarification needed) The claim is substantially accurate in its core factual content: the Coalition government did spend approximately $275,000-$320,000 on legal costs defending court cases brought to challenge its denial of medical transfers for asylum seekers with life-threatening conditions [1][2].
该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 在zài zài 核心hé xīn hé xīn 事实shì shí shì shí 内容nèi róng nèi róng 上shàng shàng 基本jī běn jī běn 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què :: : CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 花费huā fèi huā fèi 约yuē yuē 27.527.5 27.5 万至wàn zhì wàn zhì 3232 32 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 用于yòng yú yòng yú 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng ,, , 为wèi wèi 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn 其qí qí 拒绝jù jué jù jué 为wèi wèi 危及wēi jí wēi jí 生命shēng mìng shēng mìng 的de de 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 庇护bì hù bì hù 者zhě zhě 提供tí gōng tí gōng 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 转运zhuǎn yùn zhuǎn yùn 的de de 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 案件àn jiàn àn jiàn 辩护biàn hù biàn hù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The claim accurately identifies this as problematic spending and accurately characterizes the nature of the cases [1][2].
该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 地dì dì 将jiāng jiāng 此cǐ cǐ 认定rèn dìng rèn dìng 为wèi wèi 有yǒu yǒu 问题wèn tí wèn tí 的de de 支出zhī chū zhī chū ,, , 并bìng bìng 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 描述miáo shù miáo shù 了le le 案件àn jiàn àn jiàn 性质xìng zhì xìng zhì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
However, two clarifications are warranted: 1. **Exact figure:** The $320,000 figure is slightly inaccurate; reports reference approximately $275,000 with some variation depending on cost definitions [1] 2. **"Denying" framing:** While technically accurate (the government was defending denial decisions), the phrasing could be misleading.
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 需要xū yào xū yào 两点liǎng diǎn liǎng diǎn 澄清chéng qīng chéng qīng :: :
The spending was the cost of defending those decisions in court, a process in which the government lost repeatedly [2][3].
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 确切què qiè què qiè 金额jīn é jīn é :: : ** * ** * 3232 32 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 的de de 数字shù zì shù zì 略有lüè yǒu lüè yǒu 偏差piān chā piān chā ;; ; 报道bào dào bào dào 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 约yuē yuē 27.527.5 27.5 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán ,, , 根据gēn jù gēn jù 成本chéng běn chéng běn 定义dìng yì dìng yì 有所不同yǒu suǒ bù tóng yǒu suǒ bù tóng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The government wasn't strategically "spending money to deny" transfers; rather, it incurred costs defending decisions that courts found inadequate [2][3].
22 2 .. . ** * ** * "" " 拒绝jù jué jù jué "" " 措辞cuò cí cuò cí :: : ** * ** * 虽然suī rán suī rán 技术jì shù jì shù 上shàng shàng 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què (( ( 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 正在zhèng zài zhèng zài 为wèi wèi 拒绝jù jué jù jué 决定jué dìng jué dìng 辩护biàn hù biàn hù )) ) ,, , 但dàn dàn 这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 措辞cuò cí cuò cí 可能kě néng kě néng 产生chǎn shēng chǎn shēng 误导wù dǎo wù dǎo 。。 。
The claim's substance is accurate: significant taxpayer money was spent on legal costs related to the government's restrictive approach to medical transfers, and this occurred before the Medevac Bill created a better system [1][2][4].
这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 支出zhī chū zhī chū 是shì shì 在zài zài 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 上shàng shàng 为wèi wèi 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 决定jué dìng jué dìng 辩护biàn hù biàn hù 的de de 成本chéng běn chéng běn ,, , 而ér ér 这zhè zhè 一yī yī 过程guò chéng guò chéng 中zhōng zhōng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 反复fǎn fù fǎn fù 败诉bài sù bài sù [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 战略性zhàn lüè xìng zhàn lüè xìng 地dì dì "" " 花钱huā qián huā qián 拒绝jù jué jù jué "" " 转运zhuǎn yùn zhuǎn yùn ;; ; 相反xiāng fǎn xiāng fǎn ,, , 它tā tā 产生chǎn shēng chǎn shēng 了le le 为wèi wèi 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 认定rèn dìng rèn dìng 不bù bù 充分chōng fèn chōng fèn 的de de 决定jué dìng jué dìng 辩护biàn hù biàn hù 的de de 成本chéng běn chéng běn [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 的de de 实质shí zhì shí zhì 是shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de :: : 大量dà liàng dà liàng 纳税人nà shuì rén nà shuì rén 的de de 钱qián qián 被bèi bèi 用于yòng yú yòng yú 与yǔ yǔ 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 对duì duì 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 转运zhuǎn yùn zhuǎn yùn 的de de 限制性xiàn zhì xìng xiàn zhì xìng 方法fāng fǎ fāng fǎ 相关xiāng guān xiāng guān 的de de 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng ,, , 而ér ér 这zhè zhè 发生fā shēng fā shēng 在zài zài MedevacMedevac Medevac 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì 更好gèng hǎo gèng hǎo 制度zhì dù zhì dù 之前zhī qián zhī qián [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。

📚 来源与引用 (9)

  1. 1
    theguardian.com

    theguardian.com

    Cost likely to be far higher this year, with a growing number of critically ill people seeking federal court intervention

    the Guardian
  2. 2
    refugeecouncil.org.au

    refugeecouncil.org.au

    What is offshore processing? Why does Australia have an offshore processing policy? How has offshore processing caused harm?

    Refugee Council of Australia
  3. 3
    asyluminsight.com

    asyluminsight.com

    Asylum Insight

  4. 4
    amnesty.org

    amnesty.org

    This move by the Nauru government is a dangerous and callous act that could have deadly consequences

    Amnesty International
  5. 5
    theconversation.com

    theconversation.com

    With parliament sitting next week, the home affairs minister is pressuring Labor to support a repeal of the medevac law. But the law has worked just as it was intended.

    The Conversation
  6. 6
    abc.net.au

    abc.net.au

    Follow the latest headlines from ABC News, Australia's most trusted media source, with live events, audio and on-demand video from the national broadcaster.

    Abc Net
  7. 7
    theguardian.com

    theguardian.com

    Theguardian
  8. 8
    aph.gov.au

    aph.gov.au

     

    Aph Gov
  9. 9
    aph.gov.au

    aph.gov.au

    Hansard is the name given to the official transcripts of all public proceedings of the Australian parliament and also to that section of the Department of Parliamentary Services that produces these transcripts. This includes the Senate, the House of Representatives,

    Aph Gov

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。