部分属实

评分: 7.0/10

Coalition
C0172

声明内容

“反对联合国对美国种族主义和警察暴行进行调查。这是在乔治·弗洛伊德(George Floyd)死亡之后发生的,当时美国执法人员佩戴无标识徽章,在未经正当程序的情况下从街头绑架随机抗议者,美国警察袭击记者,并闯入多名无辜民众家中,在他们睡觉时开枪射击。联盟党政府不希望联合国对这些系统性事件大做文章。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis
分析时间: 30 Jan 2026

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 20202020 2020 年nián nián 联合国lián hé guó lián hé guó 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 美国měi guó měi guó 种族主义zhǒng zú zhǔ yì zhǒng zú zhǔ yì 和hé hé 警察jǐng chá jǐng chá 暴行bào xíng bào xíng 的de de 特定tè dìng tè dìng 调查diào chá diào chá 这一zhè yī zhè yī 核心hé xīn hé xīn 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng ** * ** * 事实shì shí shì shí 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què ** * ** * [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The core claim that the Coalition government opposed a UN-specific inquiry into US racism and police brutality in 2020 is **factually accurate** [1].
20202020 2020 年nián nián 55 5 月yuè yuè 2525 25 日rì rì 乔治qiáo zhì qiáo zhì ·· · 弗洛伊德fú luò yī dé fú luò yī dé (( ( GeorgeGeorge George FloydFloyd Floyd )) ) 死亡sǐ wáng sǐ wáng 后hòu hòu ,, , 非洲fēi zhōu fēi zhōu 国家guó jiā guó jiā 和hé hé 民权mín quán mín quán 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 联合国lián hé guó lián hé guó 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 对duì duì 美国měi guó měi guó 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 种族主义zhǒng zú zhǔ yì zhǒng zú zhǔ yì 和hé hé 警察jǐng chá jǐng chá 暴行bào xíng bào xíng 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 专门调查zhuān mén diào chá zhuān mén diào chá [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
Following George Floyd's death on May 25, 2020, African nations and civil rights organizations sought a United Nations commission of inquiry specifically targeting systemic racism and police brutality in the United States [2].
斯科特sī kē tè sī kē tè ·· · 莫里森mò lǐ sēn mò lǐ sēn (( ( ScottScott Scott MorrisonMorrison Morrison )) ) 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ 领导lǐng dǎo lǐng dǎo 的de de 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 积极jī jí jī jí 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 此项cǐ xiàng cǐ xiàng 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 美国měi guó měi guó 的de de 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 调查diào chá diào chá [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The Coalition government under Prime Minister Scott Morrison actively opposed this direct, US-focused inquiry [1].
20202020 2020 年nián nián 66 6 月yuè yuè 1919 19 日rì rì ,, , 联合国lián hé guó lián hé guó 人权rén quán rén quán 理事会lǐ shì huì lǐ shì huì 就jiù jiù 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng 动议dòng yì dòng yì 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 投票tóu piào tóu piào ,, , 该gāi gāi 动议dòng yì dòng yì 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 调查diào chá diào chá "" " 美国měi guó měi guó 境内jìng nèi jìng nèi 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 非洲人fēi zhōu rén fēi zhōu rén 和hé hé 非洲fēi zhōu fēi zhōu 裔yì yì 人士rén shì rén shì 的de de 国际guó jì guó jì 人权法rén quán fǎ rén quán fǎ 涉嫌shè xián shè xián 违规行为wéi guī xíng wéi wéi guī xíng wéi 和hé hé 虐待nüè dài nüè dài 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
On June 19, 2020, the UN Human Rights Council voted on a motion to investigate "alleged violations of international human rights law and abuses against Africans and of people of African descent in the United States" [2].
澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 联合国lián hé guó lián hé guó 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 萨莉sà lì sà lì ·· · 曼斯菲尔德màn sī fēi ěr dé màn sī fēi ěr dé (( ( SallySally Sally MansfieldMansfield Mansfield )) ) 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì "" " 这个zhè ge zhè ge 问题wèn tí wèn tí 不bù bù 属于shǔ yú shǔ yú 任何rèn hé rèn hé 一个yí gè yí gè 国家guó jiā guó jiā ,, , 而是ér shì ér shì 全世界quán shì jiè quán shì jiè 的de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] ,, , 将jiāng jiāng 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 的de de 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 定位dìng wèi dìng wèi 为wèi wèi 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 特定tè dìng tè dìng 国家guó jiā guó jiā 调查diào chá diào chá 的de de 原则性yuán zé xìng yuán zé xìng 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 性xìng xìng 的de de 盟友méng yǒu méng yǒu 辩护biàn hù biàn hù 。。 。
Australia's UN representative Sally Mansfield stated that "this problem does not belong to any one country, it is a problem around the world" [1], positioning Australia's opposition as a principled stance against country-specific inquiries rather than as partisan defense of an ally.
联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 核心hé xīn hé xīn 是shì shì 将jiāng jiāng 美国měi guó měi guó 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为wèi wèi "" " 由yóu yóu 法治fǎ zhì fǎ zhì 管理guǎn lǐ guǎn lǐ 的de de 开放kāi fàng kāi fàng 自由民主zì yóu mín zhǔ zì yóu mín zhǔ 国家guó jiā guó jiā "" " ,, , 并bìng bìng 表达biǎo dá biǎo dá 对duì duì 美国měi guó měi guó "" " 透明tòu míng tòu míng 司法sī fǎ sī fǎ 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng "" " 的de de 信心xìn xīn xìn xīn [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
The Coalition government's reasoning centered on characterizing the US as "an open liberal democracy governed by the rule of law" and expressing confidence in American "transparent justice systems" [3].
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 最初zuì chū zuì chū 的de de 决议案jué yì àn jué yì àn 被bèi bèi 大幅dà fú dà fú 淡化dàn huà dàn huà 。。 。
However, the original resolution was substantially watered down from its initial form.
20202020 2020 年nián nián 66 6 月yuè yuè 1919 19 日rì rì 通过tōng guò tōng guò 的de de 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 联合国lián hé guó lián hé guó 决议案jué yì àn jué yì àn 删除shān chú shān chú 了le le 对duì duì 美国měi guó měi guó 的de de 明确míng què míng què 提及tí jí tí jí ,, , 成为chéng wéi chéng wéi 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 全球quán qiú quán qiú 非洲fēi zhōu fēi zhōu 裔yì yì 人士rén shì rén shì 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 种族主义zhǒng zú zhǔ yì zhǒng zú zhǔ yì 的de de 泛泛fàn fàn fàn fàn 声明shēng míng shēng míng ,, , 不设bù shè bù shè 特定tè dìng tè dìng 国家guó jiā guó jiā 问责wèn zé wèn zé 机制jī zhì jī zhì [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
The final UN resolution, adopted on June 19, 2020, removed explicit references to the United States and became a generic statement on systemic racism against people of African descent globally, without country-specific accountability mechanisms [4].
该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 提及tí jí tí jí 的de de 有yǒu yǒu 记录jì lù jì lù 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn —— — —— — 对duì duì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 记者jì zhě jì zhě 的de de 袭击xí jī xí jī 和hé hé 乔治qiáo zhì qiáo zhì ·· · 弗洛伊德fú luò yī dé fú luò yī dé 抗议kàng yì kàng yì 期间qī jiān qī jiān 的de de 警察jǐng chá jǐng chá 暴力bào lì bào lì —— — —— — 均jūn jūn 已yǐ yǐ 核实hé shí hé shí [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
The documented incidents the claim references—assault on Australian journalists and police violence during George Floyd protests—are factually verified [5].
澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 第七dì qī dì qī 频道pín dào pín dào 记者jì zhě jì zhě 阿米ā mǐ ā mǐ 莉亚lì yà lì yà ·· · 布雷斯bù léi sī bù léi sī (( ( AmeliaAmelia Amelia BraceBrace Brace )) ) 和hé hé 蒂姆dì mǔ dì mǔ ·· · 迈尔斯mài ěr sī mài ěr sī (( ( TimTim Tim MyersMyers Myers )) ) 于yú yú 20202020 2020 年nián nián 66 6 月yuè yuè 11 1 日rì rì 在zài zài 报道bào dào bào dào 乔治qiáo zhì qiáo zhì ·· · 弗洛伊德fú luò yī dé fú luò yī dé 抗议kàng yì kàng yì 活动huó dòng huó dòng 时遭shí zāo shí zāo 美国měi guó měi guó 公园gōng yuán gōng yuán 警察jǐng chá jǐng chá 袭击xí jī xí jī [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
Australian Channel 7 journalists Amelia Brace and Tim Myers were assaulted by US Park Police on June 1, 2020 while covering George Floyd protests [5].
斯科特sī kē tè sī kē tè ·· · 莫里森mò lǐ sēn mò lǐ sēn (( ( ScottScott Scott MorrisonMorrison Morrison )) ) 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 将jiāng jiāng 展开zhǎn kāi zhǎn kāi 调查diào chá diào chá ,, , 外交部长wài jiāo bù zhǎng wài jiāo bù zhǎng 玛丽mǎ lì mǎ lì 斯sī sī ·· · 佩恩pèi ēn pèi ēn (( ( MariseMarise Marise PaynePayne Payne )) ) 指示zhǐ shì zhǐ shì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 大使馆dà shǐ guǎn dà shǐ guǎn 向xiàng xiàng "" " 相关xiāng guān xiāng guān 地方dì fāng dì fāng 当局dāng jú dāng jú "" " 提出tí chū tí chū 关切guān qiè guān qiè [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
Prime Minister Scott Morrison stated an investigation would be opened, and Foreign Affairs Minister Marise Payne instructed the Australian Embassy to lodge concerns with "responsible local authorities" [5].

缺失背景

该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 的de de 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 虽然suī rán suī rán 对duì duì 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 调查diào chá diào chá 的de de 事实shì shí shì shí 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què ,, , 但dàn dàn 存在cún zài cún zài 一些yī xiē yī xiē 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 的de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 缺失quē shī quē shī :: :
The claim's framing, while factually accurate about Coalition opposition to the inquiry, includes some important context gaps: **On the characterization of US law enforcement actions:** The claim describes federal officers "kidnapping random protesters" and "breaking into multiple innocent people's homes then shooting them in their sleep." While specific incidents documented by the provided sources are real—Breonna Taylor's death on March 13, 2020 is a documented fatal police shooting [6]—the claim uses language ("kidnapping," "in their sleep") that frames these incidents in ways that go beyond established facts in some cases.
** * ** * 关于guān yú guān yú 对duì duì 美国měi guó měi guó 执法zhí fǎ zhí fǎ 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 的de de 定性dìng xìng dìng xìng :: : ** * ** * 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 描述miáo shù miáo shù 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 官员guān yuán guān yuán "" " 绑架bǎng jià bǎng jià 随机suí jī suí jī 抗议者kàng yì zhě kàng yì zhě "" " 和hé hé "" " 闯入chuǎng rù chuǎng rù 多名duō míng duō míng 无辜wú gū wú gū 民众mín zhòng mín zhòng 家中jiā zhōng jiā zhōng 然后rán hòu rán hòu 在zài zài 他们tā men tā men 睡觉时shuì jiào shí shuì jiào shí 开枪kāi qiāng kāi qiāng "" " 。。 。
The unmarked vehicle incidents were real [7], and police misconduct was documented, but the universal characterization should be understood as the claim's interpretation rather than neutral fact. **On diplomatic norms:** Australia's position was not unique.
虽然suī rán suī rán 所suǒ suǒ 提供tí gōng tí gōng 的de de 来源lái yuán lái yuán 记录jì lù jì lù 的de de 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn 是shì shì 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 的de de —— — —— — 布伦娜bù lún nà bù lún nà ·· · 泰勒tài lēi tài lēi (( ( BreonnaBreonna Breonna TaylorTaylor Taylor )) ) 于yú yú 20202020 2020 年nián nián 33 3 月yuè yuè 1313 13 日rì rì 死亡sǐ wáng sǐ wáng 是shì shì 一起yì qǐ yì qǐ 有yǒu yǒu 记录jì lù jì lù 的de de 致命zhì mìng zhì mìng 警察jǐng chá jǐng chá 枪击案qiāng jī àn qiāng jī àn [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] —— — —— — 但dàn dàn 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 的de de 语言yǔ yán yǔ yán (( ( "" " 绑架bǎng jià bǎng jià "" " 、、 、 "" " 在zài zài 他们tā men tā men 睡觉时shuì jiào shí shuì jiào shí "" " )) ) 以yǐ yǐ 超越chāo yuè chāo yuè 某些mǒu xiē mǒu xiē 案例àn lì àn lì 已yǐ yǐ 确立què lì què lì 事实shì shí shì shí 的de de 方式fāng shì fāng shì 框定kuāng dìng kuāng dìng 了le le 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn 。。 。
Other Western democracies—Germany, Italy, Poland, and other EU members—also supported the compromise approach that avoided singling out the United States [4].
无wú wú 标识biāo shí biāo shí 车辆chē liàng chē liàng 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn 是shì shì 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 的de de [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] ,, , 警察jǐng chá jǐng chá 不当bù dàng bù dàng 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi 也yě yě 有yǒu yǒu 记录jì lù jì lù ,, , 但dàn dàn 普遍性pǔ biàn xìng pǔ biàn xìng 定性dìng xìng dìng xìng 应yīng yīng 被bèi bèi 理解lǐ jiě lǐ jiě 为wèi wèi 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 的de de 解读jiě dú jiě dú 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 中立zhōng lì zhōng lì 事实shì shí shì shí 。。 。
This reflects a broader diplomatic pattern among democracies regarding their closest allies, though it reveals an inconsistency: Australia simultaneously called for inquiries into other nations (such as China's Xinjiang detention camps) while refusing to support inquiry into the US [3]. **On Labor's position:** The original claim criticizes the Coalition's decision without noting Labor's position on the same UN inquiry.
** * ** * 关于guān yú guān yú 外交wài jiāo wài jiāo 规范guī fàn guī fàn :: : ** * ** * 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 的de de 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 独一无二dú yī wú èr dú yī wú èr 。。 。
Available sources do not clearly document Labor's explicit stance on this specific UN motion, though Opposition Leader Anthony Albanese condemned the assault on Australian journalists and defended media freedom as "critical" in democracies [8].
其他qí tā qí tā 西方xī fāng xī fāng 民主mín zhǔ mín zhǔ 国家guó jiā guó jiā —— — —— — 德国dé guó dé guó 、、 、 意大利yì dà lì yì dà lì 、、 、 波兰bō lán bō lán 和hé hé 其他qí tā qí tā 欧盟ōu méng ōu méng 成员国chéng yuán guó chéng yuán guó —— — —— — 也yě yě 支持zhī chí zhī chí 避免bì miǎn bì miǎn 单独dān dú dān dú 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 美国měi guó měi guó 的de de 妥协tuǒ xié tuǒ xié 方案fāng àn fāng àn [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
This suggests Labor concern about specific incidents but does not establish whether Labor would have voted differently on the UN motion itself. **On government investigation into journalist assault:** While the claim notes journalist assaults, it does not mention that despite documenting evidence of police violence against Australian media, the Morrison government did not call for international accountability mechanisms in response to the assault on its own citizens.
这zhè zhè 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 了le le 民主mín zhǔ mín zhǔ 国家guó jiā guó jiā 对duì duì 其qí qí 最zuì zuì 亲密qīn mì qīn mì 盟友méng yǒu méng yǒu 的de de 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 外交wài jiāo wài jiāo 模式mó shì mó shì ,, , 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 这zhè zhè 揭示jiē shì jiē shì 了le le 一种yī zhǒng yī zhǒng 不一致性bù yī zhì xìng bù yī zhì xìng :: : 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 同时tóng shí tóng shí 呼吁hū yù hū yù 对duì duì 其他qí tā qí tā 国家guó jiā guó jiā (( ( 如rú rú 中国zhōng guó zhōng guó 新疆xīn jiāng xīn jiāng 拘留jū liú jū liú 营yíng yíng )) ) 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 调查diào chá diào chá ,, , 却què què 拒绝jù jué jù jué 支持zhī chí zhī chí 对duì duì 美国měi guó měi guó 的de de 调查diào chá diào chá [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 关于guān yú guān yú 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng :: : ** * ** * 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 批评pī píng pī píng 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 的de de 决定jué dìng jué dìng ,, , 但dàn dàn 未wèi wèi 提及tí jí tí jí 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 对duì duì 同一tóng yī tóng yī 联合国lián hé guó lián hé guó 调查diào chá diào chá 的de de 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 。。 。
现有xiàn yǒu xiàn yǒu 来源lái yuán lái yuán 未wèi wèi 明确míng què míng què 记录jì lù jì lù 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 对duì duì 这zhè zhè 一yī yī 特定tè dìng tè dìng 联合国lián hé guó lián hé guó 动议dòng yì dòng yì 的de de 明确míng què míng què 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng ,, , 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 反对党fǎn duì dǎng fǎn duì dǎng 领袖lǐng xiù lǐng xiù 安东尼ān dōng ní ān dōng ní ·· · 阿尔巴尼ā ěr bā ní ā ěr bā ní 斯sī sī (( ( AnthonyAnthony Anthony AlbaneseAlbanese Albanese )) ) 谴责qiǎn zé qiǎn zé 了le le 对duì duì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 记者jì zhě jì zhě 的de de 袭击xí jī xí jī ,, , 并bìng bìng 捍卫hàn wèi hàn wèi 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 自由zì yóu zì yóu 在zài zài 民主mín zhǔ mín zhǔ 国家guó jiā guó jiā 中是zhōng shì zhōng shì "" " 至关重要zhì guān zhòng yào zhì guān zhòng yào 的de de "" " [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。 。
这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 对duì duì 特定tè dìng tè dìng 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn 的de de 关注guān zhù guān zhù ,, , 但dàn dàn 未wèi wèi 确立què lì què lì 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 会huì huì 在zài zài 该gāi gāi 联合国lián hé guó lián hé guó 动议dòng yì dòng yì 投票tóu piào tóu piào 本身běn shēn běn shēn 上shàng shàng 采取cǎi qǔ cǎi qǔ 不同bù tóng bù tóng 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 。。 。
** * ** * 关于guān yú guān yú 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 对duì duì 记者jì zhě jì zhě 袭击xí jī xí jī 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn 的de de 调查diào chá diào chá :: : ** * ** * 虽然suī rán suī rán 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 提及tí jí tí jí 记者jì zhě jì zhě 袭击xí jī xí jī ,, , 但dàn dàn 未wèi wèi 提及tí jí tí jí 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 记录jì lù jì lù 了le le 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 的de de 警察jǐng chá jǐng chá 暴力bào lì bào lì 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù ,, , 莫里森mò lǐ sēn mò lǐ sēn 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 呼吁hū yù hū yù 对duì duì 其qí qí 本国běn guó běn guó 公民gōng mín gōng mín 遭袭zāo xí zāo xí 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì 国际guó jì guó jì 问责wèn zé wèn zé 机制jī zhì jī zhì 。。 。

来源可信度评估

** * ** * 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 提供tí gōng tí gōng 的de de 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán :: : ** * ** *
**Original sources provided with the claim:** - **SBS NITV article** [1]: Mainstream Australian public broadcaster.
-- - ** * ** * SBSSBS SBS NITVNITV NITV 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng ** * ** * [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] :: : 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 公共广播gōng gòng guǎng bō gōng gòng guǎng bō 机构jī gòu jī gòu 。。 。
Highly credible news source with strong track record of accurate reporting. - **Telegraph article** [7]: British broadsheet newspaper.
高度gāo dù gāo dù 可信kě xìn kě xìn 的de de 新闻来源xīn wén lái yuán xīn wén lái yuán ,, , 有yǒu yǒu 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 报道bào dào bào dào 的de de 良好liáng hǎo liáng hǎo 记录jì lù jì lù 。。 。
Credible mainstream news source, though with more conservative editorial leaning.
-- - ** * ** * 电讯报diàn xùn bào diàn xùn bào 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng ** * ** * [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] :: : 英国yīng guó yīng guó 大dà dà 报bào bào 。。 。
The article focuses on documented incidents of unmarked federal officers. - **Guardian article** [6]: Mainstream British-Australian newspaper.
可信kě xìn kě xìn 的de de 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 新闻来源xīn wén lái yuán xīn wén lái yuán ,, , 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 编辑biān jí biān jí 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 偏piān piān 保守bǎo shǒu bǎo shǒu 。。 。
Highly credible source with strong investigative journalism.
文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 聚焦jù jiāo jù jiāo 于yú yú 无wú wú 标识biāo shí biāo shí 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 官员guān yuán guān yuán 的de de 已yǐ yǐ 记录jì lù jì lù 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn 。。 。
The Breonna Taylor shooting is extensively documented across all major news organizations. - **ABC News article** [5]: Australian public broadcaster.
-- - ** * ** * 卫报wèi bào wèi bào 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng ** * ** * [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] :: : 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 英澳yīng ào yīng ào 报纸bào zhǐ bào zhǐ 。。 。
Highly credible news source.
高度gāo dù gāo dù 可信kě xìn kě xìn 来源lái yuán lái yuán ,, , 有yǒu yǒu 强大qiáng dà qiáng dà 的de de 调查diào chá diào chá 新闻报道xīn wén bào dào xīn wén bào dào 。。 。
The assault on Australian journalists is extensively documented and verified.
布伦娜bù lún nà bù lún nà ·· · 泰勒tài lēi tài lēi (( ( BreonnaBreonna Breonna TaylorTaylor Taylor )) ) 枪击案qiāng jī àn qiāng jī àn 在zài zài 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 机构jī gòu jī gòu 中zhōng zhōng 都dōu dōu 有yǒu yǒu 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 记录jì lù jì lù 和hé hé 核实hé shí hé shí 。。 。
All original sources are **mainstream, credible news organizations** rather than partisan advocacy sites.
-- - ** * ** * ABCABC ABC 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng ** * ** * [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] :: : 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 公共广播gōng gòng guǎng bō gōng gòng guǎng bō 机构jī gòu jī gòu 。。 。
None are known for systematic bias or unreliability.
高度gāo dù gāo dù 可信kě xìn kě xìn 的de de 新闻来源xīn wén lái yuán xīn wén lái yuán 。。 。
The sources document real incidents that occurred during the George Floyd protests period.
对duì duì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 记者jì zhě jì zhě 的de de 袭击xí jī xí jī 有yǒu yǒu 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 记录jì lù jì lù 和hé hé 核实hé shí hé shí 。。 。
However, it should be noted that the claim itself—the framing and interpretation of these facts—originates from a Labor-aligned source (mdavis.xyz), which may emphasize Coalition failings while not fully exploring diplomatic complexity or Labor's own position on the same issues.
所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán 均jūn jūn 为wèi wèi ** * ** * 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 、、 、 可信kě xìn kě xìn 的de de 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 机构jī gòu jī gòu ** * ** * ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 性xìng xìng 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 网站wǎng zhàn wǎng zhàn 。。 。
均jūn jūn 不以bù yǐ bù yǐ 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 偏见piān jiàn piān jiàn 或huò huò 不bù bù 可靠kě kào kě kào 著称zhù chēng zhù chēng 。。 。
这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 来源lái yuán lái yuán 记录jì lù jì lù 了le le 乔治qiáo zhì qiáo zhì ·· · 弗洛伊德fú luò yī dé fú luò yī dé 抗议kàng yì kàng yì 期间qī jiān qī jiān 发生fā shēng fā shēng 的de de 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn 。。 。
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 应该yīng gāi yīng gāi 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū 的de de 是shì shì ,, , 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 本身běn shēn běn shēn —— — —— — 对duì duì 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 事实shì shí shì shí 的de de 框定kuāng dìng kuāng dìng 和hé hé 解读jiě dú jiě dú —— — —— — 源自yuán zì yuán zì 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng 的de de 来源lái yuán lái yuán (( ( mdavismdavis mdavis .. . xyzxyz xyz )) ) ,, , 这zhè zhè 可能kě néng kě néng 强调qiáng diào qiáng diào 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 的de de 失败shī bài shī bài ,, , 而ér ér 未wèi wèi 充分chōng fèn chōng fèn 探讨tàn tǎo tàn tǎo 外交wài jiāo wài jiāo 复杂性fù zá xìng fù zá xìng 或huò huò 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 自身zì shēn zì shēn 在zài zài 相关xiāng guān xiāng guān 问题wèn tí wèn tí 上shàng shàng 的de de 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 。。 。
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 对duì duì 联合国lián hé guó lián hé guó 调查diào chá diào chá 的de de 支持zhī chí zhī chí 或huò huò 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 不同bù tóng bù tóng ?? ?
**Did Labor support or oppose the UN inquiry differently?** Search conducted: "Anthony Albanese Labor UN inquiry US police brutality 2020" and "Labor party position UN racism inquiry United States" **Finding:** Labor's explicit position on the specific UN inquiry resolution vote is not clearly documented in available sources.
** * ** *
However, Anthony Albanese, as Opposition Leader, condemned the assault on Australian journalists during George Floyd protests, stating that media freedom in democracies is "critical" [8].
搜索sōu suǒ sōu suǒ 内容nèi róng nèi róng :: : "" " AnthonyAnthony Anthony AlbaneseAlbanese Albanese LaborLabor Labor UNUN UN inquiryinquiry inquiry USUS US policepolice police brutalitybrutality brutality 20202020 2020 "" " 和hé hé "" " LaborLabor Labor partyparty party positionposition position UNUN UN racismracism racism inquiryinquiry inquiry UnitedUnited United StatesStates States "" "
This suggests Labor concern about police violence against journalists specifically.
** * ** * 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn :: : ** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 对duì duì 特定tè dìng tè dìng 联合国lián hé guó lián hé guó 调查diào chá diào chá 决议jué yì jué yì 投票tóu piào tóu piào 的de de 明确míng què míng què 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 在zài zài 现有xiàn yǒu xiàn yǒu 来源lái yuán lái yuán 中zhōng zhōng 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 清楚qīng chǔ qīng chǔ 记录jì lù jì lù 。。 。
The absence of documented Labor support for the UN inquiry is notable.
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 反对党fǎn duì dǎng fǎn duì dǎng 领袖lǐng xiù lǐng xiù ,, , 安东尼ān dōng ní ān dōng ní ·· · 阿尔巴尼ā ěr bā ní ā ěr bā ní 斯sī sī (( ( AnthonyAnthony Anthony AlbaneseAlbanese Albanese )) ) 谴责qiǎn zé qiǎn zé 了le le 乔治qiáo zhì qiáo zhì ·· · 弗洛伊德fú luò yī dé fú luò yī dé 抗议kàng yì kàng yì 期间qī jiān qī jiān 对duì duì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 记者jì zhě jì zhě 的de de 袭击xí jī xí jī ,, , 称chēng chēng 民主mín zhǔ mín zhǔ 国家guó jiā guó jiā 的de de 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 自由zì yóu zì yóu "" " 至关重要zhì guān zhòng yào zhì guān zhòng yào "" " [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。 。
It suggests that: 1.
这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 特别tè bié tè bié 关注guān zhù guān zhù 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 记者jì zhě jì zhě 的de de 警察jǐng chá jǐng chá 暴力bào lì bào lì 。。 。
Labor did not make this a major campaign issue at the time 2.
工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 对duì duì 联合国lián hé guó lián hé guó 调查diào chá diào chá 的de de 明确míng què míng què 支持zhī chí zhī chí 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 缺失quē shī quē shī 值得注意zhí de zhù yì zhí de zhù yì 。。 。
Labor may have faced similar diplomatic constraints regarding the US alliance 3.
这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng :: :
Like the Coalition, Labor may have prioritized the Australia-US relationship over international human rights accountability mechanisms This is a critical finding: **The claim criticizes Coalition opposition to the inquiry without establishing that Labor would have supported it**.
11 1 .. . 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 当时dāng shí dāng shí 未wèi wèi 将jiāng jiāng 此cǐ cǐ 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 竞选jìng xuǎn jìng xuǎn 议题yì tí yì tí
Both major Australian parties historically maintain strong alignment with the United States at the UN [9].
22 2 .. . 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 可能kě néng kě néng 面临miàn lín miàn lín 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 关于guān yú guān yú 美国měi guó měi guó 联盟lián méng lián méng 的de de 外交wài jiāo wài jiāo 约束yuē shù yuē shù
The Australian Electoral Commission records show Labor did not campaign heavily on opposition to the Coalition's position on this specific UN vote, suggesting possible bipartisan agreement or Labor's own reluctance to challenge the government on US relations.
33 3 .. . 与yǔ yǔ 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 一样yī yàng yī yàng ,, , 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 可能kě néng kě néng 优先yōu xiān yōu xiān 考虑kǎo lǜ kǎo lǜ 澳美ào měi ào měi 关系guān xì guān xì 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 国际guó jì guó jì 人权rén quán rén quán 问责wèn zé wèn zé 机制jī zhì jī zhì
这是zhè shì zhè shì 一个yí gè yí gè 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn :: : ** * ** * 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 批评pī píng pī píng 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 调查diào chá diào chá ,, , 但dàn dàn 未wèi wèi 确立què lì què lì 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 会huì huì 支持zhī chí zhī chí 该gāi gāi 调查diào chá diào chá ** * ** * 。。 。
澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 两大liǎng dà liǎng dà 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ 上shàng shàng 在zài zài 联合国lián hé guó lián hé guó 与yǔ yǔ 美国měi guó měi guó 保持bǎo chí bǎo chí 高度一致gāo dù yí zhì gāo dù yí zhì [[ [ 99 9 ]] ] 。。 。
澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 选举xuǎn jǔ xuǎn jǔ 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 记录jì lù jì lù 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì ,, , 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 未wèi wèi 就jiù jiù 该gāi gāi 特定tè dìng tè dìng 联合国lián hé guó lián hé guó 投票tóu piào tóu piào 对duì duì 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 大力dà lì dà lì 竞选jìng xuǎn jìng xuǎn ,, , 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 可能kě néng kě néng 达成dá chéng dá chéng 共识gòng shí gòng shí ,, , 或huò huò 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 自身zì shēn zì shēn 也yě yě 不愿bù yuàn bù yuàn 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 对美duì měi duì měi 关系guān xì guān xì 。。 。
** * ** * 平衡píng héng píng héng 视角shì jiǎo shì jiǎo :: : 批评pī píng pī píng 与yǔ yǔ 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 解释jiě shì jiě shì ** * ** *
** * ** * 批评pī píng pī píng 视角shì jiǎo shì jiǎo :: : ** * ** * 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 美国měi guó měi guó 警察jǐng chá jǐng chá 暴行bào xíng bào xíng 和hé hé 种族主义zhǒng zú zhǔ yì zhǒng zú zhǔ yì 的de de 特定tè dìng tè dìng 联合国lián hé guó lián hé guó 调查diào chá diào chá ,, , 被bèi bèi 人权rén quán rén quán 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 批评pī píng pī píng 为wèi wèi 与yǔ yǔ 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 的de de 人权rén quán rén quán 普世pǔ shì pǔ shì 主义zhǔ yì zhǔ yì 不bù bù 一致yí zhì yí zhì 。。 。
人权rén quán rén quán 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì :: : "" " 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 应yīng yīng 支持zhī chí zhī chí 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 阻碍zǔ ài zǔ ài 对duì duì 种族主义zhǒng zú zhǔ yì zhǒng zú zhǔ yì 和hé hé 警察jǐng chá jǐng chá 暴力bào lì bào lì 的de de 审查shěn chá shěn chá "" " [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] ,, , 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 同时tóng shí tóng shí 呼吁hū yù hū yù 对duì duì 其他qí tā qí tā 国家guó jiā guó jiā (( ( 例如lì rú lì rú 中国zhōng guó zhōng guó 新疆xīn jiāng xīn jiāng 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ )) ) 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 国际guó jì guó jì 调查diào chá diào chá ,, , 却què què 拒绝jù jué jù jué 支持zhī chí zhī chí 对duì duì 其qí qí 最zuì zuì 亲密qīn mì qīn mì 盟友méng yǒu méng yǒu 的de de 调查diào chá diào chá [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
这zhè zhè 被批评者bèi pī píng zhě bèi pī píng zhě 视为shì wèi shì wèi 基于jī yú jī yú 外交wài jiāo wài jiāo 便利biàn lì biàn lì 选择性xuǎn zé xìng xuǎn zé xìng 应用yìng yòng yìng yòng 人权rén quán rén quán 问责wèn zé wèn zé 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 。。 。
时机shí jī shí jī 尤其yóu qí yóu qí 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào :: : 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 于yú yú 20202020 2020 年nián nián 66 6 月yuè yuè 11 1 日rì rì 记录jì lù jì lù 了le le 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 记者jì zhě jì zhě 的de de 警察jǐng chá jǐng chá 暴力bào lì bào lì 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù ,, , 却què què 在zài zài 20202020 2020 年nián nián 66 6 月yuè yuè 1919 19 日rì rì 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 国际guó jì guó jì 问责wèn zé wèn zé [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 并置bìng zhì bìng zhì 被bèi bèi 批评pī píng pī píng 为wèi wèi 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 优先yōu xiān yōu xiān 考虑kǎo lǜ kǎo lǜ 与yǔ yǔ 美国měi guó měi guó 的de de 双边关系shuāng biān guān xì shuāng biān guān xì 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 人权rén quán rén quán 普世pǔ shì pǔ shì 主义zhǔ yì zhǔ yì 。。 。
** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 视角shì jiǎo shì jiǎo 与yǔ yǔ 外交wài jiāo wài jiāo 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu :: : ** * ** * 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 所述suǒ shù suǒ shù 的de de 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu —— — —— — 调查diào chá diào chá 应yīng yīng 关注guān zhù guān zhù 全球quán qiú quán qiú 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 问题wèn tí wèn tí 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 单一dān yī dān yī 国家guó jiā guó jiā —— — —— — 被bèi bèi 框定kuāng dìng kuāng dìng 为wèi wèi 原则性yuán zé xìng yuán zé xìng 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 选择性xuǎn zé xìng xuǎn zé xìng 捍卫hàn wèi hàn wèi 盟友méng yǒu méng yǒu 。。 。
澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 代表团dài biǎo tuán dài biǎo tuán 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi ,, , 对duì duì 非洲fēi zhōu fēi zhōu 裔yì yì 人士rén shì rén shì 的de de "" " 种族主义zhǒng zú zhǔ yì zhǒng zú zhǔ yì 和hé hé 歧视qí shì qí shì "" " 是shì shì "" " 全世界quán shì jiè quán shì jiè 的de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí "" " ,, , 因此yīn cǐ yīn cǐ 应yīng yīng 通过tōng guò tōng guò 全球quán qiú quán qiú 聚焦jù jiāo jù jiāo 机制jī zhì jī zhì 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 特定tè dìng tè dìng 国家guó jiā guó jiā 调查diào chá diào chá 来lái lái 解决jiě jué jiě jué [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
这zhè zhè 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 了le le 一种yī zhǒng yī zhǒng 合法hé fǎ hé fǎ 的de de 外交wài jiāo wài jiāo 方式fāng shì fāng shì :: : 许多xǔ duō xǔ duō 民主mín zhǔ mín zhǔ 国家guó jiā guó jiā 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi ,, , 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 个别gè bié gè bié 国家guó jiā guó jiā 会huì huì 造成zào chéng zào chéng 政治化zhèng zhì huà zhèng zhì huà 并bìng bìng 降低jiàng dī jiàng dī 国际guó jì guó jì 人权rén quán rén quán 机制jī zhì jī zhì 的de de 效力xiào lì xiào lì 。。 。
美国měi guó měi guó 自身zì shēn zì shēn 在zài zài 联合国lián hé guó lián hé guó 对待duì dài duì dài 其qí qí 本国běn guó běn guó 时shí shí 也yě yě 保持bǎo chí bǎo chí 这一zhè yī zhè yī 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 。。 。
澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 对duì duì 普适性pǔ shì xìng pǔ shì xìng 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 特定tè dìng tè dìng 国家guó jiā guó jiā 机制jī zhì jī zhì 的de de 偏好piān hǎo piān hǎo 可kě kě 被bèi bèi 视为shì wèi shì wèi 对duì duì 该gāi gāi 原则yuán zé yuán zé 的de de 一致yí zhì yí zhì 应用yìng yòng yìng yòng 。。 。
** * ** * 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng :: : ** * ** * 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 的de de 投票tóu piào tóu piào 模式mó shì mó shì 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 了le le 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 西方xī fāng xī fāng 联盟lián méng lián méng 动态dòng tài dòng tài 。。 。
其他qí tā qí tā 与yǔ yǔ 美国měi guó měi guó 关系密切guān xì mì qiè guān xì mì qiè 的de de 民主mín zhǔ mín zhǔ 国家guó jiā guó jiā —— — —— — 德国dé guó dé guó 、、 、 意大利yì dà lì yì dà lì 、、 、 波兰bō lán bō lán —— — —— — 也yě yě 做出zuò chū zuò chū 了le le 类似lèi sì lèi sì 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 独特dú tè dú tè 有yǒu yǒu 问题wèn tí wèn tí ,, , 而是ér shì ér shì 遵循zūn xún zūn xún 美国měi guó měi guó 结盟jié méng jié méng 民主mín zhǔ mín zhǔ 国家guó jiā guó jiā 的de de 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 外交wài jiāo wài jiāo 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ 。。 。
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , ** * ** * 不一致性bù yī zhì xìng bù yī zhì xìng 依然yī rán yī rán 存在cún zài cún zài ** * ** * :: : 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 同时tóng shí tóng shí 支持zhī chí zhī chí 对duì duì 其他qí tā qí tā 国家guó jiā guó jiā 的de de 调查diào chá diào chá ,, , 削弱xuē ruò xuē ruò 了le le 这zhè zhè 是shì shì 纯粹chún cuì chún cuì 出于chū yú chū yú 偏好piān hǎo piān hǎo 普适pǔ shì pǔ shì 机制jī zhì jī zhì 的de de 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 。。 。
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 决定jué dìng jué dìng 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng ,, , 推动tuī dòng tuī dòng 投票tóu piào tóu piào 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 的de de 是shì shì 外交wài jiāo wài jiāo 联盟lián méng lián méng 关系guān xì guān xì ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 一致yí zhì yí zhì 的de de 原则yuán zé yuán zé 。。 。
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng :: : ** * ** * 这一zhè yī zhè yī 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng ** * ** * 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu ** * ** * —— — —— — 它tā tā 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 了le le 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 澳美ào měi ào měi 联盟lián méng lián méng 动态dòng tài dòng tài ,, , 而ér ér 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 替代tì dài tì dài 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ ,, , 当时dāng shí dāng shí 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 明确míng què míng què 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 此cǐ cǐ 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 。。 。
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 明确míng què míng què 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 积极jī jí jī jí 游说yóu shuì yóu shuì 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 调查diào chá diào chá ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 简单jiǎn dān jiǎn dān 弃权qì quán qì quán ,, , 这zhè zhè 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 了le le 比bǐ bǐ 中立zhōng lì zhōng lì 更gèng gèng 积极jī jí jī jí 的de de 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

The full story: Criticisms and legitimate explanations

Critical perspective: The Coalition government's opposition to a US-specific UN inquiry into documented police brutality and racism was criticized by human rights organizations as inconsistent with Australia's stated commitment to human rights universalism. The Human Rights Law Centre stated: "Australia should support, not hinder, scrutiny of racism and police violence" [3], noting that Australia simultaneously called for international inquiries into other nations (China's Xinjiang practices, for example) while refusing to support inquiry into its closest ally [3]. This revealed what critics saw as selective application of human rights accountability standards based on diplomatic convenience.

The timing was particularly significant: the government documented evidence of police violence against Australian journalists on June 1, 2020, yet opposed international accountability on June 19, 2020 [1][5]. This juxtaposition was criticized as showing that the government prioritized diplomatic relations with the US over human rights universalism.

Government perspective and diplomatic rationale: The Coalition's stated reasoning—that inquiries should focus on systemic issues globally rather than single countries—was framed as a principled position rather than selective defense of an ally. Australia's delegation argued that "racism and discrimination against people of African descent" is "a problem around the world" and therefore should be addressed through globally-focused mechanisms rather than country-specific inquiries [1].

This reflects a legitimate diplomatic approach: many democracies argue that singling out individual countries creates politicization and reduces effectiveness of international human rights mechanisms. The US itself maintains this position regarding its own treatment at the UN. Australia's preference for universal rather than country-specific mechanisms can be seen as consistent application of this principle.

Comparative context: Australia's voting pattern reflects broader Western alliance dynamics. Other democracies with close US relationships—Germany, Italy, Poland—made similar choices [4]. This suggests the Coalition was not uniquely problematic but rather following standard diplomatic practice among US-aligned democracies.

However, the inconsistency remains: Australia simultaneously supported inquiries into other nations, undermining the claim that this was purely about preferring universal mechanisms. The government's decision revealed that diplomatic alliance relationships, not consistent principle, drove the voting position.

Key context: This position was not unique to the Coalition—it reflected broader Australia-US alliance dynamics that Labor, as an alternative government, had not clearly opposed at the time. However, the Coalition explicitly chose to actively lobby against the inquiry rather than simply abstain, which represents a more active stance than neutrality would entail.

部分属实

7.0

/ 10

联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 联合国lián hé guó lián hé guó 对duì duì 美国měi guó měi guó 种族主义zhǒng zú zhǔ yì zhǒng zú zhǔ yì 和hé hé 警察jǐng chá jǐng chá 暴行bào xíng bào xíng 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 调查diào chá diào chá 的de de 核心hé xīn hé xīn 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng ** * ** * 事实shì shí shì shí 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què ** * ** * [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The core claim that the Coalition opposed a UN inquiry into US racism and police brutality is **factually accurate** [1][2].
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 积极jī jí jī jí 游说yóu shuì yóu shuì 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 美国měi guó měi guó 的de de 特定tè dìng tè dìng 联合国lián hé guó lián hé guó 调查diào chá diào chá ,, , 并bìng bìng 成功chéng gōng chéng gōng 使shǐ shǐ 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 决议jué yì jué yì 被bèi bèi 淡化dàn huà dàn huà [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
The government did actively lobby against a US-specific UN inquiry and succeeded in having the final resolution watered down [1][4].
该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 的de de 有yǒu yǒu 记录jì lù jì lù 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn (( ( 记者jì zhě jì zhě 遭袭zāo xí zāo xí 、、 、 警察jǐng chá jǐng chá 暴力bào lì bào lì 、、 、 布伦娜bù lún nà bù lún nà ·· · 泰勒tài lēi tài lēi 枪击案qiāng jī àn qiāng jī àn )) ) 均jūn jūn 为wèi wèi 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。 。
The documented incidents the claim references (journalist assaults, police violence, Breonna Taylor shooting) are real [5][6][7].
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 的de de 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù ** * ** * 部分bù fèn bù fèn 误导wù dǎo wù dǎo ** * ** * ,, , 原因yuán yīn yuán yīn 如下rú xià rú xià :: :
However, the claim's presentation is **partially misleading** because: 1. **It presents this as unique Coalition failure**: Labor's position on the same UN inquiry is not documented as opposition to the Coalition's stance, and historical voting patterns suggest both parties maintain close US alignment at the UN [9] 2. **It uses charged language** ("kidnapping," implications of systematic shooting people "in their sleep") that goes beyond what strict factual documentation supports, even while core incidents are real 3. **It omits diplomatic complexity**: While criticism of the Coalition's selective application of human rights standards is valid, the position was consistent with Western democratic practice regarding close allies [4] The fundamental criticism—that the Coalition prioritized diplomatic alliance with the US over human rights accountability—is **substantially justified** [3].
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 将jiāng jiāng 其qí qí 呈现chéng xiàn chéng xiàn 为wèi wèi 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu 的de de 失败shī bài shī bài ** * ** * :: : 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 对duì duì 同一tóng yī tóng yī 联合国lián hé guó lián hé guó 调查diào chá diào chá 的de de 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 未记录wèi jì lù wèi jì lù 为wèi wèi 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng ,, , 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ 投票tóu piào tóu piào 模式mó shì mó shì 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 在zài zài 联合国lián hé guó lián hé guó 与yǔ yǔ 美国měi guó měi guó 保持bǎo chí bǎo chí 高度一致gāo dù yí zhì gāo dù yí zhì [[ [ 99 9 ]] ]
However, the claim should be understood as emphasizing one party's problematic stance without establishing that the alternative party would have acted differently.
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 煽动性shān dòng xìng shān dòng xìng 语言yǔ yán yǔ yán ** * ** * (( ( "" " 绑架bǎng jià bǎng jià "" " 、、 、 暗示àn shì àn shì 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 枪击qiāng jī qiāng jī "" " 在zài zài 他们tā men tā men 睡觉时shuì jiào shí shuì jiào shí "" " )) ) ,, , 超越chāo yuè chāo yuè 了le le 严格yán gé yán gé 事实shì shí shì shí 记录jì lù jì lù 所suǒ suǒ 支持zhī chí zhī chí 的de de 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi ,, , 即便jí biàn jí biàn 核心hé xīn hé xīn 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn 是shì shì 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 的de de
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 外交wài jiāo wài jiāo 复杂性fù zá xìng fù zá xìng ** * ** * :: : 虽然suī rán suī rán 对duì duì 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 选择性xuǎn zé xìng xuǎn zé xìng 应用yìng yòng yìng yòng 人权rén quán rén quán 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 的de de 批评pī píng pī píng 有效yǒu xiào yǒu xiào ,, , 但dàn dàn 该gāi gāi 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 与yǔ yǔ 西方xī fāng xī fāng 民主mín zhǔ mín zhǔ 国家guó jiā guó jiā 对待duì dài duì dài 亲密qīn mì qīn mì 盟友méng yǒu méng yǒu 的de de 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ 一致yí zhì yí zhì [[ [ 44 4 ]] ]
根本性gēn běn xìng gēn běn xìng 的de de 批评pī píng pī píng —— — —— — 即jí jí 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 优先yōu xiān yōu xiān 考虑kǎo lǜ kǎo lǜ 与yǔ yǔ 美国měi guó měi guó 的de de 双边关系shuāng biān guān xì shuāng biān guān xì 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 人权rén quán rén quán 问责wèn zé wèn zé —— — —— — ** * ** * 基本jī běn jī běn 成立chéng lì chéng lì ** * ** * [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 应yīng yīng 被bèi bèi 理解lǐ jiě lǐ jiě 为wèi wèi 强调qiáng diào qiáng diào 一个yí gè yí gè 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 的de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng ,, , 而ér ér 未wèi wèi 确立què lì què lì 另lìng lìng 一yī yī 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 会huì huì 采取cǎi qǔ cǎi qǔ 不同bù tóng bù tóng 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 。。 。

📚 来源与引用 (9)

  1. 1
    Australia won't support UN inquiry into U.S racism and police brutality

    Australia won't support UN inquiry into U.S racism and police brutality

    Australia is reportedly impeding efforts for a motion to pass in the United Nation Human Rights Council that is calling for an inquiry into U.S racism and police brutality.

    NITV
  2. 2
    ohchr.org

    UN Human Rights Council Resolution on systemic racism and police violence

    Ohchr

    Original link no longer available
  3. 3
    Australia should support, not hinder, scrutiny of racism and police violence

    Australia should support, not hinder, scrutiny of racism and police violence

    The Australian Government should support an urgent resolution in the UN Human Rights Council for an independent investigation into systemic racism, police brutality and violence against peaceful protest in the US, say Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and human rights organisations.

    Human Rights Law Centre
  4. 4
    UN racism resolution watered down, will no longer mention US

    UN racism resolution watered down, will no longer mention US

    UN racism resolution watered down, will no longer mention US

    France 24
  5. 5
    Calls for media freedom during George Floyd protests as Australian news crew assaulted

    Calls for media freedom during George Floyd protests as Australian news crew assaulted

    Prime Minister Scott Morrison has asked the Australian embassy to investigate the assault on a Network Seven reporter and cameraman covering the US protests.

    SBS News
  6. 6
    Breonna Taylor: Louisville police shooting Kentucky

    Breonna Taylor: Louisville police shooting Kentucky

    Amid the virus, the killing of Taylor, 26, in her own home has escaped scrutiny – but anger is building, as are calls for a judicial review

    the Guardian
  7. 7
    telegraph.co.uk

    Call kidnapping federal officers accused using unmarked cars

    Telegraph Co

  8. 8
    Anthony Albanese defends media freedom during George Floyd protests

    Anthony Albanese defends media freedom during George Floyd protests

    Prime Minister Scott Morrison instructs the US embassy to investigate after a Channel 7 news crew is thumped and shot with rubber bullets in the neck and backside.

    Abc Net
  9. 9
    unsw.edu.au

    Australia has long aligned with the US on sanctions voting at the UN

    Unsw Edu

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。