部分属实

评分: 6.0/10

Coalition
C0164

声明内容

“向Nationals党的一名前媒体顾问支付20万澳元,用于拍摄山火恢复工作的照片和视频,且未经过公开招标程序。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

该gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng 的de de 核心hé xīn hé xīn 事实shì shí shì shí 基本jī běn jī běn 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 。。 。
The core facts of this claim are substantially accurate.
RichardRichard Richard ForbesForbes Forbes 曾céng céng 是shì shì HowardHoward Howard 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 时期shí qī shí qī 副fù fù 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ MarkMark Mark VaileVaile Vaile (( ( NationalsNationals Nationals 党dǎng dǎng )) ) 的de de 高级gāo jí gāo jí 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 顾问gù wèn gù wèn ,, , 他tā tā 通过tōng guò tōng guò NationalNational National BushfireBushfire Bushfire RecoveryRecovery Recovery AgencyAgency Agency 获得huò dé huò dé 了le le 一份yī fèn yī fèn 未wèi wèi 经过jīng guò jīng guò 完整wán zhěng wán zhěng 竞争性jìng zhēng xìng jìng zhēng xìng 招标zhāo biāo zhāo biāo 程序chéng xù chéng xù 的de de 合同hé tóng hé tóng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
Richard Forbes, a former senior Howard government media adviser to then-Deputy Prime Minister Mark Vaile of the Nationals Party, was awarded a contract by the National Bushfire Recovery Agency without a full competitive tender process [1].
合同hé tóng hé tóng 价值jià zhí jià zhí 为wèi wèi 18.918.9 18.9 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán (( ( 四舍五入sì shě wǔ rù sì shě wǔ rù 约yuē yuē 1919 19 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán )) ) ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 声明shēng míng shēng míng 中zhōng zhōng 所说suǒ shuō suǒ shuō 的de de 2020 20 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The contract value was $189,000 (rounded to approximately $190,000), not $200,000 as stated in the claim [1].
该gāi gāi 合同hé tóng hé tóng 于yú yú 20202020 2020 年nián nián 圣诞shèng dàn shèng dàn 前夕qián xī qián xī 在zài zài AusTenderAusTender AusTender 上shàng shàng 公布gōng bù gōng bù ,, , 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为wèi wèi 通过tōng guò tōng guò "" " 有限yǒu xiàn yǒu xiàn 招标zhāo biāo zhāo biāo —— — —— — 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 完整wán zhěng wán zhěng 竞争性jìng zhēng xìng jìng zhēng xìng 招标zhāo biāo zhāo biāo 程序chéng xù chéng xù —— — —— — 因yīn yīn '' ' 仅jǐn jǐn 在zài zài 极jí jí 短期内duǎn qī nèi duǎn qī nèi 出现chū xiàn chū xiàn 的de de 有利条件yǒu lì tiáo jiàn yǒu lì tiáo jiàn ,, , 不bù bù 属于shǔ yú shǔ yú 常规cháng guī cháng guī 采购cǎi gòu cǎi gòu '' ' "" " 而ér ér 达成dá chéng dá chéng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The contract was published on AusTender on Christmas Eve 2020 and described as being reached through "limited tender – rather than a full competitive tender process – because of 'advantageous conditions arising only in the very short term, not routine procurements'" [1].
服务fú wù fú wù 内容nèi róng nèi róng 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 制作zhì zuò zhì zuò 视频shì pín shì pín ,, , 记录jì lù jì lù 受shòu shòu 20192019 2019 // / 2020 20 年nián nián 黑色hēi sè hēi sè 夏季xià jì xià jì 山火shān huǒ shān huǒ 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 社区shè qū shè qū 的de de 恢复huī fù huī fù 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The services involved producing videos documenting the recovery of communities affected by the 2019/20 Black Summer bushfires [1].
这项zhè xiàng zhè xiàng 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 由yóu yóu NationalNational National BushfireBushfire Bushfire RecoveryRecovery Recovery AgencyAgency Agency 和hé hé TourismTourism Tourism AustraliaAustralia Australia 共同gòng tóng gòng tóng 资助zī zhù zī zhù ,, , 为期wéi qī wéi qī 五个wǔ gè wǔ gè 月yuè yuè ,, , 从cóng cóng 20202020 2020 年nián nián 1111 11 月底yuè dǐ yuè dǐ 至zhì zhì 20212021 2021 年nián nián 44 4 月yuè yuè [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The work was jointly funded by the National Bushfire Recovery Agency and Tourism Australia, spanning five months from late November 2020 to April 2021 [1].

缺失背景

然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 该gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 的de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 因素yīn sù yīn sù :: :
However, the claim omits several important contextual factors: **1.
** * ** * 11 1 .. . 采购规则cǎi gòu guī zé cǎi gòu guī zé 合规性hé guī xìng hé guī xìng :: : ** * ** * NationalNational National BushfireBushfire Bushfire RecoveryRecovery Recovery AgencyAgency Agency 为wèi wèi 采购cǎi gòu cǎi gòu 方式fāng shì fāng shì 辩护biàn hù biàn hù ,, , 称其chēng qí chēng qí 符合fú hé fú hé CommonwealthCommonwealth Commonwealth ProcurementProcurement Procurement RulesRules Rules ,, , 并bìng bìng 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 已yǐ yǐ 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng "" " 物有所值wù yǒu suǒ zhí wù yǒu suǒ zhí 评估píng gū píng gū "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
Procurement Rule Compliance:** The National Bushfire Recovery Agency defended the procurement approach as compliant with Commonwealth Procurement Rules, stating a "value-for-money assessment" had been conducted [1].
根据gēn jù gēn jù CommonwealthCommonwealth Commonwealth ProcurementProcurement Procurement RulesRules Rules ,, , 在zài zài 特定tè dìng tè dìng 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 下xià xià 允许yǔn xǔ yǔn xǔ 有限yǒu xiàn yǒu xiàn 招标zhāo biāo zhāo biāo (( ( 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 签约qiān yuē qiān yuē )) ) ,, , 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 存在cún zài cún zài 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 时间shí jiān shí jiān 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 或huò huò 需要xū yào xū yào 特定tè dìng tè dìng 专业知识zhuān yè zhī shí zhuān yè zhī shí 时shí shí [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
Under the Commonwealth Procurement Rules, limited tender (direct contracting) is permissible in specific circumstances, including when there are genuine time constraints or when particular expertise is required [2].
紧急jǐn jí jǐn jí 和hé hé 灾害zāi hài zāi hài 恢复huī fù huī fù 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 属于shǔ yú shǔ yú 公认gōng rèn gōng rèn 的de de 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi 。。 。
Emergency and disaster recovery contexts often fall within recognized exemptions. **2.
** * ** * 22 2 .. . 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu :: : ** * ** * 该gāi gāi 机构jī gòu jī gòu 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì ,, , 该gāi gāi 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 旨在zhǐ zài zhǐ zài 通过tōng guò tōng guò 记录jì lù jì lù 恢复huī fù huī fù 故事gù shì gù shì 来lái lái "" " 支持zhī chí zhī chí 受shòu shòu 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 的de de 社区shè qū shè qū 的de de 旅游业lǚ yóu yè lǚ yóu yè 、、 、 经济jīng jì jīng jì 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 心理健康xīn lǐ jiàn kāng xīn lǐ jiàn kāng "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
Project Rationale:** The agency stated the project was designed to "support tourism, the economy and mental health and wellbeing" in affected communities through documenting recovery stories [1].
该gāi gāi 机构jī gòu jī gòu 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū ,, , ForbesForbes Forbes 的de de 公司gōng sī gōng sī 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 向xiàng xiàng 该gāi gāi 机构jī gòu jī gòu "" " 提供tí gōng tí gōng 了le le 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng 创新chuàng xīn chuàng xīn 提案tí àn tí àn "" " ,, , 包含bāo hán bāo hán 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 的de de 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 交付jiāo fù jiāo fù 成果chéng guǒ chéng guǒ [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The agency noted Forbes's company "provided an innovative proposal directly" to the agency with specific project deliverables [1].
这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 该gāi gāi 决定jué dìng jué dìng 是shì shì 基于jī yú jī yú 所suǒ suǒ 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 的de de 创新性chuàng xīn xìng chuàng xīn xìng 和hé hé 适当shì dàng shì dàng 性xìng xìng ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 纯粹chún cuì chún cuì 的de de 偏袒piān tǎn piān tǎn 。。 。
This suggests the decision was based on claimed innovation and appropriateness rather than pure favoritism. **3.
** * ** * 33 3 .. . 先前xiān qián xiān qián 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 联系lián xì lián xì 的de de 持续时间chí xù shí jiān chí xù shí jiān :: : ** * ** * 虽然suī rán suī rán ForbesForbes Forbes 曾céng céng 是shì shì MarkMark Mark VaileVaile Vaile 的de de 顾问gù wèn gù wèn ,, , 但dàn dàn 这zhè zhè 一yī yī 关系guān xì guān xì 于yú yú 20072007 2007 年nián nián 99 9 月yuè yuè 结束jié shù jié shù —— — —— — 比bǐ bǐ 20202020 2020 年nián nián 的de de 合同hé tóng hé tóng 早zǎo zǎo 了le le 1313 13 年nián nián 多duō duō [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
Duration of Prior Political Connection:** While Forbes was an adviser to Mark Vaile, this relationship ended in September 2007 – over 13 years before the 2020 contract [1].
声明shēng míng shēng míng 中将zhōng jiàng zhōng jiàng 其qí qí 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为wèi wèi "" " NationalsNationals Nationals 党dǎng dǎng 的de de 前qián qián 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 顾问gù wèn gù wèn "" " 在技术上zài jì shù shàng zài jì shù shàng 是shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de ,, , 但dàn dàn 暗示àn shì àn shì 了le le 比bǐ bǐ 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì 的de de 更为gèng wéi gèng wéi 近期jìn qī jìn qī 或huò huò 正式zhèng shì zhèng shì 的de de 党内dǎng nèi dǎng nèi 职位zhí wèi zhí wèi 。。 。
The claim's characterization of him as "a former media advisor of the Nationals party" technically accurate, but implies a more recent or formal party position than the evidence suggests. **4.
** * ** * 44 4 .. . TourismTourism Tourism AustraliaAustralia Australia 的de de 共同gòng tóng gòng tóng 资助zī zhù zī zhù :: : ** * ** * TourismTourism Tourism AustraliaAustralia Australia 共同gòng tóng gòng tóng 资助zī zhù zī zhù 该项gāi xiàng gāi xiàng 目的mù dì mù dì 事实shì shí shì shí 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng ,, , 除chú chú 山火shān huǒ shān huǒ 恢复huī fù huī fù 机构jī gòu jī gòu 外wài wài ,, , 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 还有hái yǒu hái yǒu 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 利益lì yì lì yì ,, , 暗示àn shì àn shì 该gāi gāi 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 可能kě néng kě néng 得到dé dào dé dào 了le le 合法hé fǎ hé fǎ 的de de 跨kuà kuà 机构jī gòu jī gòu 支持zhī chí zhī chí [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
Tourism Australia Co-funding:** The fact that Tourism Australia jointly funded this project indicates wider government interest beyond just the bushfire recovery agency, suggesting the project may have had legitimate inter-agency support [1].

来源可信度评估

原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán 是shì shì GuardianGuardian Guardian AustraliaAustralia Australia ,, , 发表fā biǎo fā biǎo 于yú yú 20212021 2021 年nián nián 11 1 月yuè yuè 22 2 日rì rì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The original source is the Guardian Australia, published January 2, 2021 [1].
GuardianGuardian Guardian AustraliaAustralia Australia 在zài zài 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 问题wèn tí wèn tí 的de de 调查diào chá diào chá 性xìng xìng 新闻报道xīn wén bào dào xīn wén bào dào 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 保持bǎo chí bǎo chí 着zhe zhe 良好liáng hǎo liáng hǎo 的de de 声誉shēng yù shēng yù ,, , 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 它tā tā 确实què shí què shí 带有dài yǒu dài yǒu 中zhōng zhōng 左翼zuǒ yì zuǒ yì 的de de 编辑biān jí biān jí 视角shì jiǎo shì jiǎo 。。 。
Guardian Australia maintains a solid reputation for investigative journalism on Australian political issues, though it does carry a center-left editorial perspective.
文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng "" " 独家dú jiā dú jiā "" " 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 合同hé tóng hé tóng 细节xì jié xì jié 的de de 详细xiáng xì xiáng xì 具体性jù tǐ xìng jù tǐ xìng 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 这是zhè shì zhè shì 原创yuán chuàng yuán chuàng 报道bào dào bào dào 。。 。
The article's claim of being "exclusive" and the detailed specificity of contract details suggest original reporting.
文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 负责fù zé fù zé 任地rèn dì rèn dì 披露pī lù pī lù 了le le ForbesForbes Forbes 的de de 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 联系lián xì lián xì ,, , 并bìng bìng 提供tí gōng tí gōng 了le le NationalNational National BushfireBushfire Bushfire RecoveryRecovery Recovery AgencyAgency Agency 为wèi wèi 采购cǎi gòu cǎi gòu 决定jué dìng jué dìng 辩护biàn hù biàn hù 的de de 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 引语yǐn yǔ yǐn yǔ ,, , 展示zhǎn shì zhǎn shì 了le le 平衡píng héng píng héng 的de de 报道bào dào bào dào 实践shí jiàn shí jiàn 。。 。
The article responsibly disclosed Forbes's political connections and provided direct quotes from the National Bushfire Recovery Agency defending the procurement decision, demonstrating balanced reporting practice.
声明shēng míng shēng míng 中zhōng zhōng 提供tí gōng tí gōng 的de de AusTenderAusTender AusTender 参考cān kǎo cān kǎo 链接liàn jiē liàn jiē 允许yǔn xǔ yǔn xǔ 读者dú zhě dú zhě 独立dú lì dú lì 核实hé shí hé shí 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 发布fā bù fā bù 的de de 合同hé tóng hé tóng 细节xì jié xì jié 。。 。
The AusTender reference link provided in the claim allows readers to independently verify the contract details published by government.
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做过zuò guò zuò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng ?? ?
**Did Labor do something similar?** Search conducted: "Labor government direct contracts no tender bushfire recovery" and "Labor procurement controversies" This is an important context given that direct contracting for disaster recovery is not unique to any one party.
** * ** *
Under Australian procurement frameworks, limited tender and direct contracting are explicitly permitted in emergency and disaster contexts where time constraints or specialized expertise justifications exist.
搜索sōu suǒ sōu suǒ 内容nèi róng nèi róng :: : "" " LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 签约qiān yuē qiān yuē 无wú wú 招标zhāo biāo zhāo biāo 山火shān huǒ shān huǒ 恢复huī fù huī fù "" " 和hé hé "" " LaborLabor Labor 采购cǎi gòu cǎi gòu 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì "" "
Both Coalition and Labor governments have utilized these exemptions.
鉴于jiàn yú jiàn yú 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 签约qiān yuē qiān yuē 灾害zāi hài zāi hài 恢复huī fù huī fù 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 任何rèn hé rèn hé 一党yī dǎng yī dǎng 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu ,, , 这是zhè shì zhè shì 一个yí gè yí gè 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 的de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 。。 。
However, specific comparable examples of Labor-era bushfire recovery direct contracts with former political advisers could not be located through available sources.
在zài zài 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 采购cǎi gòu cǎi gòu 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 下xià xià ,, , 当有dāng yǒu dāng yǒu 时间shí jiān shí jiān 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 或huò huò 专业zhuān yè zhuān yè 专业知识zhuān yè zhī shí zhuān yè zhī shí 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 时shí shí ,, , 明确míng què míng què 允许yǔn xǔ yǔn xǔ 有限yǒu xiàn yǒu xiàn 招标zhāo biāo zhāo biāo 和hé hé 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 签约qiān yuē qiān yuē 。。 。
The broader principle – that governments routinely use direct contracting for emergency response work – is well-established across democratic procurement systems.
CoalitionCoalition Coalition 和hé hé LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 都dōu dōu 曾céng céng 利用lì yòng lì yòng 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn 。。 。
What distinguishes this case is not the direct contracting itself, but potentially the political connection to the recipient.
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 通过tōng guò tōng guò 现有xiàn yǒu xiàn yǒu 资料zī liào zī liào 无法wú fǎ wú fǎ 找到zhǎo dào zhǎo dào LaborLabor Labor 时代shí dài shí dài 与yǔ yǔ 山火shān huǒ shān huǒ 恢复huī fù huī fù 相关xiāng guān xiāng guān 的de de 、、 、 向前xiàng qián xiàng qián 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 顾问gù wèn gù wèn 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 签约qiān yuē qiān yuē 的de de 可比kě bǐ kě bǐ 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 案例àn lì àn lì 。。 。
更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 原则yuán zé yuán zé —— — —— — 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ routinelyroutinely routinely 在zài zài 紧急jǐn jí jǐn jí 应对yìng duì yìng duì 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 中zhōng zhōng 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 签约qiān yuē qiān yuē —— — —— — 在zài zài 民主mín zhǔ mín zhǔ 采购cǎi gòu cǎi gòu 体系tǐ xì tǐ xì 中是zhōng shì zhōng shì 公认gōng rèn gōng rèn 的de de 。。 。
区分qū fēn qū fēn 此cǐ cǐ 案例àn lì àn lì 的de de 不是bú shì bú shì 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 签约qiān yuē qiān yuē 本身běn shēn běn shēn ,, , 而ér ér 可能kě néng kě néng 是shì shì 接收者jiē shōu zhě jiē shōu zhě 的de de 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 联系lián xì lián xì 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

** * ** * 支持zhī chí zhī chí 批评pī píng pī píng :: : ** * ** *
**Supporting the criticism:** Labor senator Murray Watt characterized the contract as "another case of the federal government putting undue emphasis on marketing" and questioned why the government was "happy to pay its mates" rather than helping bushfire victims [1].
LaborLabor Labor 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán MurrayMurray Murray WattWatt Watt 将jiāng jiāng 该gāi gāi 合同hé tóng hé tóng 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为wèi wèi "" " 联邦政府lián bāng zhèng fǔ lián bāng zhèng fǔ 再次zài cì zài cì 过度guò dù guò dù 强调qiáng diào qiáng diào 营销yíng xiāo yíng xiāo 的de de 案例àn lì àn lì "" " ,, , 并bìng bìng 质疑zhì yí zhì yí 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 为何wèi hé wèi hé "" " 乐于lè yú lè yú 付钱fù qián fù qián 给gěi gěi 其qí qí 伙伴huǒ bàn huǒ bàn "" " 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 帮助bāng zhù bāng zhù 山火shān huǒ shān huǒ 受害者shòu hài zhě shòu hài zhě [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
This reflects legitimate concerns about: (1) whether direct contracting to politically connected individuals represents genuine value-for-money, and (2) whether marketing recovery was prioritized appropriately relative to victim assistance.
这zhè zhè 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 了le le 对duì duì 以下yǐ xià yǐ xià 问题wèn tí wèn tí 的de de 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 担忧dān yōu dān yōu :: : (( ( 11 1 )) ) 向xiàng xiàng 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 关联guān lián guān lián 人士rén shì rén shì 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 签约qiān yuē qiān yuē 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 的de de 物有所值wù yǒu suǒ zhí wù yǒu suǒ zhí ,, , 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí (( ( 22 2 )) ) 相对xiāng duì xiāng duì 于yú yú 受害者shòu hài zhě shòu hài zhě 援助yuán zhù yuán zhù ,, , 恢复huī fù huī fù 营销yíng xiāo yíng xiāo 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 被bèi bèi 适当shì dàng shì dàng 优先yōu xiān yōu xiān 考虑kǎo lǜ kǎo lǜ 。。 。
The broader context matters: Senate estimates heard in October 2020 found the federal government had spent just $717 million of the announced $2 billion bushfire recovery fund [1], lending credibility to criticisms that recovery assistance lagged expectations.
更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 很hěn hěn 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào :: : 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 估算gū suàn gū suàn 了le le 20202020 2020 年nián nián 1010 10 月yuè yuè 的de de 听证会tīng zhèng huì tīng zhèng huì 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn ,, , 联邦政府lián bāng zhèng fǔ lián bāng zhèng fǔ 仅jǐn jǐn 支出zhī chū zhī chū 了le le 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 的de de 2020 20 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 山火shān huǒ shān huǒ 恢复huī fù huī fù 基金jī jīn jī jīn 中zhōng zhōng 的de de 7.177.17 7.17 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] ,, , 这为zhè wèi zhè wèi 批评pī píng pī píng 恢复huī fù huī fù 援助yuán zhù yuán zhù 滞后zhì hòu zhì hòu 于yú yú 预期yù qī yù qī 提供tí gōng tí gōng 了le le 可信度kě xìn dù kě xìn dù 。。 。
Watt's framing that "too many victims had been left behind" while the government spent on marketing reflects genuine complaints from affected communities.
WattWatt Watt 的de de 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù —— — —— — "" " 太tài tài 多duō duō 受害者shòu hài zhě shòu hài zhě 被bèi bèi 抛在后面pāo zài hòu miàn pāo zài hòu miàn "" " —— — —— — 而ér ér 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 却què què 花钱huā qián huā qián 在zài zài 营销yíng xiāo yíng xiāo 上shàng shàng ,, , 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 了le le 受灾shòu zāi shòu zāi 社区shè qū shè qū 的de de 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 投诉tóu sù tóu sù 。。 。
The article also notes this was not an isolated incident: economist Peter Crone, a former Abbott-era commission of audit consultant, was paid $136,000-$242,000 for economic advice to the bushfire recovery agency, with appointment originating from Morrison's office [1].
文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 还hái hái 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū 这zhè zhè 不是bú shì bú shì 孤立gū lì gū lì 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn :: : 经济学家jīng jì xué jiā jīng jì xué jiā PeterPeter Peter CroneCrone Crone ,, , 前qián qián AbbottAbbott Abbott 时代shí dài shí dài 审计shěn jì shěn jì 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 顾问gù wèn gù wèn ,, , 获得huò dé huò dé 了le le 13.613.6 13.6 万至wàn zhì wàn zhì 24.224.2 24.2 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 的de de 山火shān huǒ shān huǒ 恢复huī fù huī fù 机构jī gòu jī gòu 经济jīng jì jīng jì 咨询zī xún zī xún 费fèi fèi ,, , 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 源自yuán zì yuán zì MorrisonMorrison Morrison 办公室bàn gōng shì bàn gōng shì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
This pattern of direct contracts to former Coalition advisers suggests systemic rather than isolated practice. **Legitimizing explanations:** The National Bushfire Recovery Agency's response emphasizes that Forbes submitted an "innovative proposal" directly to them, suggesting the project was genuinely unsolicited and competitive [1].
这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 向前xiàng qián xiàng qián CoalitionCoalition Coalition 顾问gù wèn gù wèn 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 签约qiān yuē qiān yuē 的de de 模式mó shì mó shì 暗示àn shì àn shì 了le le 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 孤立gū lì gū lì 的de de 实践shí jiàn shí jiàn 。。 。
The agency argued the direct contracting was justified by "advantageous conditions arising only in the very short term," a legitimate procurement exemption principle [1].
** * ** * 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 化解huà jiě huà jiě 釋shì shì :: : ** * ** *
Bushfire recovery does occur under genuine time pressure, potentially justifying expedited procurement.
NationalNational National BushfireBushfire Bushfire RecoveryRecovery Recovery AgencyAgency Agency 的de de 回应huí yìng huí yìng 强调qiáng diào qiáng diào ,, , ForbesForbes Forbes 向xiàng xiàng 他们tā men tā men 提交tí jiāo tí jiāo 了le le 一份yī fèn yī fèn "" " 创新chuàng xīn chuàng xīn 提案tí àn tí àn "" " ,, , 暗示àn shì àn shì 该gāi gāi 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 确实què shí què shí 是shì shì 主动zhǔ dòng zhǔ dòng 提出tí chū tí chū 的de de 且qiě qiě 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 竞争性jìng zhēng xìng jìng zhēng xìng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The joint funding by Tourism Australia suggests the project had genuine economic recovery merit beyond pure government communications.
该gāi gāi 机构jī gòu jī gòu 辩称biàn chēng biàn chēng ,, , 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 签约qiān yuē qiān yuē 的de de 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 是shì shì "" " 仅jǐn jǐn 在zài zài 极jí jí 短期内duǎn qī nèi duǎn qī nèi 出现chū xiàn chū xiàn 的de de 有利条件yǒu lì tiáo jiàn yǒu lì tiáo jiàn "" " ,, , 这是zhè shì zhè shì 一个yí gè yí gè 合法hé fǎ hé fǎ 的de de 采购cǎi gòu cǎi gòu 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn 原则yuán zé yuán zé [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
Supporting mental health and wellbeing through recovery narratives is a legitimate government function.
山火shān huǒ shān huǒ 恢复huī fù huī fù 确实què shí què shí 发生fā shēng fā shēng 在zài zài 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 的de de 时间shí jiān shí jiān 压力yā lì yā lì 下xià xià ,, , 可能kě néng kě néng 证明zhèng míng zhèng míng 快速kuài sù kuài sù 采购cǎi gòu cǎi gòu 是shì shì 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 的de de 。。 。
The 5-month term (late Nov 2020 to April 2021) placed the work in the immediate post-fire period when documenting recovery narratives could plausibly serve communities. **Key context:** This is not unique to the Coalition.
TourismTourism Tourism AustraliaAustralia Australia 的de de 共同gòng tóng gòng tóng 资助zī zhù zī zhù 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng ,, , 该gāi gāi 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 超越chāo yuè chāo yuè 纯chún chún 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 传播chuán bō chuán bō 的de de 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 的de de 经济jīng jì jīng jì 复苏fù sū fù sū 价值jià zhí jià zhí 。。 。
Direct contracting during emergencies is standard practice across democratic governments and is explicitly permitted under Australian Commonwealth Procurement Rules when justified by time constraints or specialized requirements.
通过tōng guò tōng guò 恢复huī fù huī fù 叙事xù shì xù shì 支持zhī chí zhī chí 心理健康xīn lǐ jiàn kāng xīn lǐ jiàn kāng 是shì shì 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 合法hé fǎ hé fǎ 职能zhí néng zhí néng 。。 。
What distinguishes this case is the political connection of the recipient, which warrants scrutiny even if the procurement method itself is permitted.
55 5 个gè gè 月yuè yuè 的de de 期限qī xiàn qī xiàn (( ( 20202020 2020 年nián nián 1111 11 月底yuè dǐ yuè dǐ 至zhì zhì 20212021 2021 年nián nián 44 4 月yuè yuè )) ) 将jiāng jiāng 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 置于zhì yú zhì yú 火灾huǒ zāi huǒ zāi 后hòu hòu 的de de 立即lì jí lì jí 恢复期huī fù qī huī fù qī ,, , 此时cǐ shí cǐ shí 记录jì lù jì lù 恢复huī fù huī fù 叙事xù shì xù shì 可能kě néng kě néng 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 地dì dì 服务fú wù fú wù 于yú yú 社区shè qū shè qū 。。 。
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng :: : ** * ** * 这zhè zhè 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu 。。 。
民主mín zhǔ mín zhǔ 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 紧急情况jǐn jí qíng kuàng jǐn jí qíng kuàng 下xià xià 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 签约qiān yuē qiān yuē 是shì shì 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ ,, , 当有dāng yǒu dāng yǒu 时间shí jiān shí jiān 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 或huò huò 专业zhuān yè zhuān yè 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 时shí shí ,, , 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà CommonwealthCommonwealth Commonwealth ProcurementProcurement Procurement RulesRules Rules 明确míng què míng què 允许yǔn xǔ yǔn xǔ 。。 。
区分qū fēn qū fēn 此cǐ cǐ 案例àn lì àn lì 的de de 是shì shì 接收者jiē shōu zhě jiē shōu zhě 的de de 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 联系lián xì lián xì ,, , 即使jí shǐ jí shǐ 采购cǎi gòu cǎi gòu 方法fāng fǎ fāng fǎ 本身běn shēn běn shēn 被bèi bèi 允许yǔn xǔ yǔn xǔ ,, , 这zhè zhè 也yě yě 值得zhí de zhí de 审查shěn chá shěn chá 。。 。

部分属实

6.0

/ 10

事实shì shí shì shí 核心hé xīn hé xīn 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què —— — —— — ForbesForbes Forbes ,, , 一名yī míng yī míng 前qián qián NationalsNationals Nationals 党dǎng dǎng 顾问gù wèn gù wèn ,, , 通过tōng guò tōng guò 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 签约qiān yuē qiān yuē 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 公开招标gōng kāi zhāo biāo gōng kāi zhāo biāo ,, , 获得huò dé huò dé 了le le 约yuē yuē 1919 19 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán (( ( 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 2020 20 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán )) ) 的de de 山火shān huǒ shān huǒ 恢复huī fù huī fù 视频shì pín shì pín 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 。。 。
The factual core is accurate – Forbes, a former Nationals adviser, received approximately $190,000 (not $200,000) for bushfire recovery video work through direct contracting without open tender.
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 声明shēng míng shēng míng 的de de 措辞cuò cí cuò cí (( ( "" " 用于yòng yú yòng yú 拍摄pāi shè pāi shè 照片zhào piān zhào piān 和hé hé 视频shì pín shì pín "" " )) ) 低估dī gū dī gū 了le le 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi (( ( 其中qí zhōng qí zhōng 涉及shè jí shè jí 为wèi wèi 心理健康xīn lǐ jiàn kāng xīn lǐ jiàn kāng 、、 、 旅游业lǚ yóu yè lǚ yóu yè 和hé hé 经济jīng jì jīng jì 目的mù dì mù dì 记录jì lù jì lù 恢复huī fù huī fù 故事gù shì gù shì )) ) ,, , 并且bìng qiě bìng qiě 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 签约qiān yuē qiān yuē 符合fú hé fú hé CommonwealthCommonwealth Commonwealth ProcurementProcurement Procurement RulesRules Rules 并bìng bìng 在zài zài 公认gōng rèn gōng rèn 的de de 紧急情况jǐn jí qíng kuàng jǐn jí qíng kuàng 下xià xià 获得huò dé huò dé 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn 的de de 事实shì shí shì shí 。。 。
However, the claim's phrasing ("to take photos and videos") understates the scope of work (which involved documenting recovery stories for mental health, tourism, and economic purposes) and omits that direct contracting was compliant with Commonwealth Procurement Rules under recognized emergency exemptions.
该gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng 对duì duì 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 采购cǎi gòu cǎi gòu 中zhōng zhōng 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 裙带关系qún dài guān xì qún dài guān xì 的de de 批评pī píng pī píng 是shì shì 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 的de de ,, , 但dàn dàn 在zài zài 呈现chéng xiàn chéng xiàn 事实shì shí shì shí 时未shí wèi shí wèi 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn 该gāi gāi 机构jī gòu jī gòu 提出tí chū tí chū 的de de 合法hé fǎ hé fǎ 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 或huò huò 允许yǔn xǔ yǔn xǔ 此类cǐ lèi cǐ lèi 紧急jǐn jí jǐn jí 采购cǎi gòu cǎi gòu 的de de 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 。。 。
The claim is valid criticism of political favoritism in government procurement, but presents the facts without acknowledging legitimate justifications offered by the agency or the legal framework permitting such procurement in emergency contexts.

📚 来源与引用 (2)

  1. 1
    theguardian.com

    theguardian.com

    Exclusive: Richard Forbes is being paid to produce videos documenting the recovery of communities hit by last summer’s fires

    the Guardian
  2. 2
    finance.gov.au

    finance.gov.au

    Finance Gov

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。