部分属实

评分: 7.0/10

Coalition
C0090

声明内容

“政府对一项关于记者案件是否应保密的上诉中所提出的论点保密。也就是说,政府甚至不希望人们知道为什么他们对真实公共利益新闻的审判要保密。犯下记者所报道罪行的政府官员未被起诉。关于政府罪行的原始文章仍然公开,尽管政府声称其发表以某种方式危害了国家安全。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis
分析时间: 29 Jan 2026

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

该gāi gāi 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng 涉及shè jí shè jí 对duì duì 伯纳德bó nà dé bó nà dé ·· · 科拉kē lā kē lā 里lǐ lǐ 的de de 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù ,, , 这位zhè wèi zhè wèi 堪培拉kān péi lā kān péi lā 律师lǜ shī lǜ shī 根据gēn jù gēn jù 20012001 2001 年nián nián 《《 《 情报服务qíng bào fú wù qíng bào fú wù 法fǎ fǎ 》》 》 第dì dì 3939 39 条tiáo tiáo 被bèi bèi 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng ,, , 涉嫌shè xián shè xián 披露pī lù pī lù 与yǔ yǔ 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 在zài zài 东帝汶dōng dì wèn dōng dì wèn 的de de ASISASIS ASIS 间谍jiàn dié jiàn dié 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 有关yǒu guān yǒu guān 的de de 机密信息jī mì xìn xī jī mì xìn xī [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The claim refers to the prosecution of Bernard Collaery, a Canberra lawyer who was charged under section 39 of the Intelligence Services Act 2001 for allegedly disclosing classified information related to Australia's ASIS spying operation in Timor-Leste [1][2]. **The secret bugging operation:** In 2004, at the behest of then-Foreign Minister Alexander Downer, ASIS planted surveillance devices in the Palacio Governo building housing Timor-Leste's Prime Minister and Cabinet offices [3].
** * ** * 秘密mì mì mì mì 窃听qiè tīng qiè tīng 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng :: : ** * ** * 20042004 2004 年nián nián ,, , 应yīng yīng 时任shí rèn shí rèn 外交部长wài jiāo bù zhǎng wài jiāo bù zhǎng 亚历山大yà lì shān dà yà lì shān dà ·· · 唐纳táng nà táng nà 的de de 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú ,, , ASISASIS ASIS 在zài zài 东帝汶dōng dì wèn dōng dì wèn 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ 和hé hé 内阁nèi gé nèi gé 办公室bàn gōng shì bàn gōng shì 所在suǒ zài suǒ zài 的de de 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 宫gōng gōng 大楼dà lóu dà lóu 内nèi nèi 安装ān zhuāng ān zhuāng 了le le 监控jiān kòng jiān kòng 设备shè bèi shè bèi [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
The purpose was to obtain information about Timor-Leste's negotiating position regarding maritime boundary and oil/gas negotiations [1][2]. **Collaery's role:** Bernard Collaery, the 76-year-old former ACT attorney-general, was briefed to represent Timor-Leste's interests in 2013 when the country filed proceedings in the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague to address the maritime boundary dispute [1][2].
目的mù dì mù dì 是shì shì 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ 有关yǒu guān yǒu guān 东帝汶dōng dì wèn dōng dì wèn 在zài zài 海事hǎi shì hǎi shì 边界biān jiè biān jiè 和hé hé 石油shí yóu shí yóu // / 天然气tiān rán qì tiān rán qì 谈判tán pàn tán pàn 中zhōng zhōng 谈判tán pàn tán pàn 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 的de de 信息xìn xī xìn xī [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
His client "Witness K" was an ASIS officer who had been involved in the surveillance operation and lodged a complaint with the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security [3]. **The prosecution and secrecy issue:** Collaery was charged in December 2013 following raids by the Australian Federal Police and ASIS on his offices and Witness K's homes [2].
** * ** * 科拉kē lā kē lā 里lǐ lǐ 的de de 角色jué sè jué sè :: : ** * ** * 伯纳德bó nà dé bó nà dé ·· · 科拉kē lā kē lā 里lǐ lǐ ,, , 7676 76 岁suì suì 的de de 前qián qián 首都shǒu dū shǒu dū 领地lǐng dì lǐng dì 总zǒng zǒng 检察长jiǎn chá zhǎng jiǎn chá zhǎng ,, , 于yú yú 20132013 2013 年nián nián 东帝汶dōng dì wèn dōng dì wèn 在zài zài 海牙hǎi yá hǎi yá 常设cháng shè cháng shè 仲裁zhòng cái zhòng cái 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 提起tí qǐ tí qǐ 海事hǎi shì hǎi shì 边界争端biān jiè zhēng duān biān jiè zhēng duān 诉讼sù sòng sù sòng 时shí shí 受聘shòu pìn shòu pìn 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 东帝汶dōng dì wèn dōng dì wèn 利益lì yì lì yì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
However, criminal prosecution charges weren't approved until 2018 under then-Attorney-General Christian Porter [3].
他tā tā 的de de 当事人dāng shì rén dāng shì rén "" " 证人zhèng rén zhèng rén KK K "" " 是shì shì 一名yī míng yī míng 曾céng céng 参与cān yù cān yù 监视jiān shì jiān shì 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 的de de ASISASIS ASIS 官员guān yuán guān yuán ,, , 他tā tā 向xiàng xiàng 情报qíng bào qíng bào 安全ān quán ān quán 监察jiān chá jiān chá 长zhǎng zhǎng 提出tí chū tí chū 投诉tóu sù tóu sù [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
Four of the five charges against Collaery related to interviews he gave to ABC journalists (Radio, Lateline, 7.30, and Four Corners) after the raids, discussing the bugging operation [1].
** * ** * 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù 和hé hé 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì 问题wèn tí wèn tí :: : ** * ** * 科拉kē lā kē lā 里lǐ lǐ 于yú yú 20132013 2013 年nián nián 1212 12 月yuè yuè 被bèi bèi 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù ,, , 此前cǐ qián cǐ qián 澳大利亚联邦ào dà lì yà lián bāng ào dà lì yà lián bāng 警察jǐng chá jǐng chá 和hé hé ASISASIS ASIS 对duì duì 其qí qí 办公室bàn gōng shì bàn gōng shì 和hé hé 证人zhèng rén zhèng rén KK K 的de de 住所zhù suǒ zhù suǒ 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 了le le 突击tū jī tū jī 搜查sōu chá sōu chá [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
Remarkably, none of the ABC journalists were charged [1]. **Secret trial proceedings:** The trial was ordered to be held substantially in secret, with Justice David Mossop ruling in June 2020 that "the evidence led by the Crown that establishes what part of the matters communicated by Mr Collaery were true" would remain classified—essentially preventing public knowledge of government admissions of the spying operation [4]. **Secret appeal arguments:** When Collaery appealed the decision to hold the trial in secret, the appeal itself was held in secret [1].
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 直到zhí dào zhí dào 20182018 2018 年nián nián 时任shí rèn shí rèn 总zǒng zǒng 检察长jiǎn chá zhǎng jiǎn chá zhǎng 克里斯蒂安kè lǐ sī dì ān kè lǐ sī dì ān ·· · 波特bō tè bō tè 才cái cái 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn 刑事xíng shì xíng shì 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
This created the paradoxical situation where the government argued for secrecy in arguments about secrecy [5].
对duì duì 科拉kē lā kē lā 里lǐ lǐ 的de de 五项wǔ xiàng wǔ xiàng 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng 中有zhōng yǒu zhōng yǒu 四项sì xiàng sì xiàng 与yǔ yǔ 他tā tā 20132013 2013 -- - 20142014 2014 年nián nián 接受jiē shòu jiē shòu ABCABC ABC 记者jì zhě jì zhě 采访cǎi fǎng cǎi fǎng (( ( 广播guǎng bō guǎng bō 、、 、 LatelineLateline Lateline 、、 、 7.307.30 7.30 和hé hé FourFour Four CornersCorners Corners )) ) 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn 窃听qiè tīng qiè tīng 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 有关yǒu guān yǒu guān [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
As noted in the ABC MediaWatch segment: "neither Collaery nor his lawyers can tell us what arguments were put forward by the government or even what it wants to keep secret" [1]. **Government attempted to redact the Court of Appeal judgment:** After the ACT Court of Appeal overturned Justice Mossop's decision and ruled that most of the trial should be held in open court (warning that secret trials could undermine public confidence and deter political prosecutions), Attorney-General Michaelia Cash's office applied to have large sections of the judges' reasons redacted before public release—seeking secrecy of a judgment that rejected secrecy [5]. **Prosecution eventually dropped:** In 2024, Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus announced the discontinuation of the prosecution against Collaery [3].
值得注意zhí de zhù yì zhí de zhù yì 的de de 是shì shì ,, , 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu ABCABC ABC 记者jì zhě jì zhě 被bèi bèi 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
This followed four years of legal proceedings centered on the secrecy question.
** * ** * 秘密mì mì mì mì 审判程序shěn pàn chéng xù shěn pàn chéng xù :: : ** * ** * 审判shěn pàn shěn pàn 被bèi bèi 命令mìng lìng mìng lìng 大幅dà fú dà fú 秘密mì mì mì mì 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng ,, , 大卫dà wèi dà wèi ·· · 莫索mò suǒ mò suǒ 普法pǔ fǎ pǔ fǎ 官于guān yú guān yú 20202020 2020 年nián nián 66 6 月yuè yuè 裁定cái dìng cái dìng ,, , "" " 检方jiǎn fāng jiǎn fāng 提出tí chū tí chū 的de de 确立què lì què lì 科拉kē lā kē lā 里lǐ lǐ 先生xiān shēng xiān shēng 所suǒ suǒ 传达chuán dá chuán dá 事项shì xiàng shì xiàng 中zhōng zhōng 哪些nǎ xiē nǎ xiē 部分bù fèn bù fèn 属实shǔ shí shǔ shí 的de de 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù "" " 将jiāng jiāng 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì —— — —— — 实质shí zhì shí zhì 上shàng shàng 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng 了解liǎo jiě liǎo jiě 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 对duì duì 间谍jiàn dié jiàn dié 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 的de de 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 秘密mì mì mì mì 上诉shàng sù shàng sù 论点lùn diǎn lùn diǎn :: : ** * ** * 当dāng dāng 科拉kē lā kē lā 里lǐ lǐ 就jiù jiù 秘密mì mì mì mì 审判shěn pàn shěn pàn 决定jué dìng jué dìng 提出tí chū tí chū 上诉shàng sù shàng sù 时shí shí ,, , 上诉shàng sù shàng sù 本身běn shēn běn shēn 也yě yě 是shì shì 秘密mì mì mì mì 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 的de de [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
这zhè zhè 造成zào chéng zào chéng 了le le 自相矛盾zì xiāng máo dùn zì xiāng máo dùn 的de de 局面jú miàn jú miàn ,, , 即jí jí 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 关于guān yú guān yú 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì 的de de 论点lùn diǎn lùn diǎn 中zhōng zhōng 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
正如zhèng rú zhèng rú ABCABC ABC MediaWatchMediaWatch MediaWatch 节目jié mù jié mù 所suǒ suǒ 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū 的de de :: : "" " 科拉kē lā kē lā 里lǐ lǐ 及其jí qí jí qí 律师lǜ shī lǜ shī 无法wú fǎ wú fǎ 告诉gào sù gào sù 我们wǒ men wǒ men 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 提出tí chū tí chū 了le le 什么shén me shén me 论点lùn diǎn lùn diǎn ,, , 甚至shèn zhì shèn zhì 无法wú fǎ wú fǎ 告诉gào sù gào sù 我们wǒ men wǒ men 它tā tā 想xiǎng xiǎng 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì 什么shén me shén me "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 试图shì tú shì tú 删减shān jiǎn shān jiǎn 上诉shàng sù shàng sù 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 判决书pàn jué shū pàn jué shū :: : ** * ** * 在zài zài 首都shǒu dū shǒu dū 领地lǐng dì lǐng dì 上诉shàng sù shàng sù 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 推翻tuī fān tuī fān 莫索mò suǒ mò suǒ 普法pǔ fǎ pǔ fǎ 官guān guān 的de de 决定jué dìng jué dìng 并bìng bìng 裁定cái dìng cái dìng 大部分dà bù fèn dà bù fèn 审判shěn pàn shěn pàn 应yīng yīng 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng (( ( 警告jǐng gào jǐng gào 秘密mì mì mì mì 审判shěn pàn shěn pàn 可能kě néng kě néng 破坏pò huài pò huài 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng 信心xìn xīn xìn xīn 并bìng bìng 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù )) ) 后hòu hòu ,, , 总zǒng zǒng 检察长jiǎn chá zhǎng jiǎn chá zhǎng 米mǐ mǐ 凯莉亚kǎi lì yà kǎi lì yà ·· · 卡什kǎ shén kǎ shén 的de de 办公室bàn gōng shì bàn gōng shì 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng 在zài zài 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 发布fā bù fā bù 前qián qián 大量dà liàng dà liàng 删减shān jiǎn shān jiǎn 法官fǎ guān fǎ guān 的de de 判决pàn jué pàn jué 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu —— — —— — 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 对duì duì 拒绝jù jué jù jué 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì 的de de 判决书pàn jué shū pàn jué shū 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 撤销chè xiāo chè xiāo :: : ** * ** * 20242024 2024 年nián nián ,, , 总zǒng zǒng 检察长jiǎn chá zhǎng jiǎn chá zhǎng 马克mǎ kè mǎ kè ·· · 德dé dé 雷福斯léi fú sī léi fú sī 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 终止zhōng zhǐ zhōng zhǐ 对duì duì 科拉kē lā kē lā 里lǐ lǐ 的de de 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
这是zhè shì zhè shì 围绕wéi rào wéi rào 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì 问题wèn tí wèn tí 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 的de de 四年sì nián sì nián 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 程序chéng xù chéng xù 之后zhī hòu zhī hòu 的de de 结果jié guǒ jié guǒ 。。 。

缺失背景

** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 违法行为wéi fǎ xíng wéi wéi fǎ xíng wéi 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng :: : ** * ** * 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 有yǒu yǒu 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 澳大利亚政府ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ 本身běn shēn běn shēn 可能kě néng kě néng 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi 违法wéi fǎ wéi fǎ ,, , 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù 仍réng réng 继续jì xù jì xù 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 。。 。
**Government illegality claims:** The prosecution occurred despite evidence that the Australian government itself likely acted unlawfully.
ASISASIS ASIS 在zài zài 东帝汶dōng dì wèn dōng dì wèn 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 宫gōng gōng 办公室bàn gōng shì bàn gōng shì 内nèi nèi 未经许可wèi jīng xǔ kě wèi jīng xǔ kě 安装ān zhuāng ān zhuāng 监控jiān kòng jiān kòng 设备shè bèi shè bèi ,, , 相当于xiāng dāng yú xiāng dāng yú 刑事xíng shì xíng shì 侵入qīn rù qīn rù [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
ASIS undertook what amounts to criminal trespass in Timor-Leste by planting surveillance devices without permission in another nation's cabinet offices [2][3].
此外cǐ wài cǐ wài ,, , 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 突击tū jī tū jī 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 科拉kē lā kē lā 里lǐ lǐ 办公室bàn gōng shì bàn gōng shì 并bìng bìng 没收mò shōu mò shōu 属于shǔ yú shǔ yú 东帝汶dōng dì wèn dōng dì wèn 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn ,, , 违反wéi fǎn wéi fǎn 了le le 《《 《 联合国lián hé guó lián hé guó 国家guó jiā guó jiā 管辖guǎn xiá guǎn xiá 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn 公约gōng yuē gōng yuē 》》 》 [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
Additionally, Australia violated the UN Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States by raiding Collaery's offices and confiscating documents belonging to Timor-Leste's government [2][3].
这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 突击tū jī tū jī 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 还hái hái 违反wéi fǎn wéi fǎn 了le le 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 职业zhí yè zhí yè 特权tè quán tè quán —— — —— — 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 律师lǜ shī lǜ shī 与yǔ yǔ 客户kè hù kè hù 沟通gōu tōng gōu tōng 的de de 根本性gēn běn xìng gēn běn xìng 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 原则yuán zé yuán zé [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
The raids also violated legal professional privilege—a fundamental principle of Australian law protecting lawyer-client communications [2][3]. **The disclosures were authorized:** Witness K had requested and received permission from the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security (IGIS) to disclose information about the ASIS operation [3].
** * ** * 披露pī lù pī lù 已获yǐ huò yǐ huò 授权shòu quán shòu quán :: : ** * ** * 证人zhèng rén zhèng rén KK K 已yǐ yǐ 请求qǐng qiú qǐng qiú 并bìng bìng 获得huò dé huò dé 情报qíng bào qíng bào 安全ān quán ān quán 监察jiān chá jiān chá 长zhǎng zhǎng (( ( IGISIGIS IGIS )) ) 的de de 许可xǔ kě xǔ kě ,, , 可kě kě 披露pī lù pī lù 有关yǒu guān yǒu guān ASISASIS ASIS 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 的de de 信息xìn xī xìn xī [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
The government then blocked Witness K from testifying by confiscating his passport [2]. **Public disclosure had already occurred:** The claim's point about articles remaining public is relevant: Collaery's ABC interviews from 2013-2014 disclosed the details of the bugging operation, and ABC News and other mainstream outlets published extensively on the matter.
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 随后suí hòu suí hòu 通过tōng guò tōng guò 没收mò shōu mò shōu 证人zhèng rén zhèng rén KK K 的de de 护照hù zhào hù zhào 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ 其qí qí 作证zuò zhèng zuò zhèng [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
These articles remained online for years despite the government's national security claims [1][2].
** * ** * 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 披露pī lù pī lù 已经yǐ jīng yǐ jīng 发生fā shēng fā shēng :: : ** * ** * 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng 中zhōng zhōng 关于guān yú guān yú 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 仍然réng rán réng rán 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 的de de 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn 是shì shì 相关xiāng guān xiāng guān 的de de :: : 科拉kē lā kē lā 里lǐ lǐ 20132013 2013 -- - 20142014 2014 年nián nián 的de de ABCABC ABC 采访cǎi fǎng cǎi fǎng 披露pī lù pī lù 了le le 窃听qiè tīng qiè tīng 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 的de de 细节xì jié xì jié ,, , ABCABC ABC 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 和hé hé 其他qí tā qí tā 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 报道bào dào bào dào 了le le 此事cǐ shì cǐ shì 。。 。
Moreover, the government was aware of these disclosures for five years before approving prosecution in 2018, and took no action against the journalists [1]. **Witness K's outcome:** Witness K pleaded guilty to a lesser charge and was given a suspended sentence [4], indicating the case against him was also troublesome enough that full prosecution wasn't pursued. **Political motivation:** While the government claimed national security necessity, the timing is noteworthy: the raids occurred in December 2013, but prosecution wasn't approved until 2018 under a different attorney-general (Christian Porter, after George Brandis had previously sat on the matter).
尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 提出tí chū tí chū 国家guó jiā guó jiā 安全ān quán ān quán 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng ,, , 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 多年duō nián duō nián 来lái lái 一直yì zhí yì zhí 在线zài xiàn zài xiàn 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
This suggests political rather than strictly legal decisions about prosecution [3].
此外cǐ wài cǐ wài ,, , 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn 20182018 2018 年nián nián 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù 前qián qián 已yǐ yǐ 知晓zhī xiǎo zhī xiǎo 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 披露pī lù pī lù 五年wǔ nián wǔ nián 之zhī zhī 久jiǔ jiǔ ,, , 且qiě qiě 未wèi wèi 对duì duì 记者jì zhě jì zhě 采取行动cǎi qǔ xíng dòng cǎi qǔ xíng dòng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 证人zhèng rén zhèng rén KK K 的de de 结果jié guǒ jié guǒ :: : ** * ** * 证人zhèng rén zhèng rén KK K 对duì duì 较jiào jiào 轻qīng qīng 罪名zuì míng zuì míng 认罪rèn zuì rèn zuì 并bìng bìng 被bèi bèi 判处pàn chǔ pàn chǔ 缓刑huǎn xíng huǎn xíng [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] ,, , 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 对duì duì 他tā tā 的de de 案件àn jiàn àn jiàn 也yě yě 足够zú gòu zú gòu 棘手jí shǒu jí shǒu ,, , 因此yīn cǐ yīn cǐ 未wèi wèi 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 全面quán miàn quán miàn 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù 。。 。
** * ** * 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 动机dòng jī dòng jī :: : ** * ** * 虽然suī rán suī rán 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 国家guó jiā guó jiā 安全ān quán ān quán 必要性bì yào xìng bì yào xìng ,, , 但dàn dàn 时间shí jiān shí jiān 点diǎn diǎn 值得注意zhí de zhù yì zhí de zhù yì :: : 突击tū jī tū jī 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 发生fā shēng fā shēng 在zài zài 20132013 2013 年nián nián 1212 12 月yuè yuè ,, , 但dàn dàn 直到zhí dào zhí dào 20182018 2018 年nián nián 在zài zài 不同bù tóng bù tóng 的de de 总zǒng zǒng 检察长jiǎn chá zhǎng jiǎn chá zhǎng (( ( 克里斯蒂安kè lǐ sī dì ān kè lǐ sī dì ān ·· · 波特bō tè bō tè ,, , 此前cǐ qián cǐ qián 乔治qiáo zhì qiáo zhì ·· · 布兰迪斯bù lán dí sī bù lán dí sī 搁置gē zhì gē zhì 此事cǐ shì cǐ shì )) ) 任内rèn nèi rèn nèi 才cái cái 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù 。。 。
这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 决定jué dìng jué dìng 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 严格yán gé yán gé 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 决定jué dìng jué dìng [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。

来源可信度评估

原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ ABCABC ABC MediaWatchMediaWatch MediaWatch 来源lái yuán lái yuán 是shì shì 高度gāo dù gāo dù 可信kě xìn kě xìn 的de de 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 。。 。
The original ABC MediaWatch source is a highly reputable mainstream media outlet.
MediaWatchMediaWatch MediaWatch 是shì shì ABCABC ABC 的de de 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 批评pī píng pī píng 节目jié mù jié mù ,, , 拥有yōng yǒu yōng yǒu 3030 30 年nián nián 基于jī yú jī yú 事实shì shí shì shí 分析fēn xī fēn xī 的de de 记录jì lù jì lù ,, , 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 在zài zài 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 光谱guāng pǔ guāng pǔ 上shàng shàng 受到shòu dào shòu dào 尊重zūn zhòng zūn zhòng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
MediaWatch is ABC's media criticism program with a 30-year track record of fact-based analysis and is generally respected across the political spectrum [1].
研究yán jiū yán jiū 中zhōng zhōng 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn 的de de 其他qí tā qí tā 来源lái yuán lái yuán 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò SBSSBS SBS 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 、、 、 TheThe The ConversationConversation Conversation (( ( 学术xué shù xué shù 新闻xīn wén xīn wén )) ) 和hé hé 人权rén quán rén quán 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn (( ( 受shòu shòu 尊重zūn zhòng zūn zhòng 的de de 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī )) ) 。。 。
The other sources found in research include SBS News, The Conversation (academic journalism), and the Human Rights Law Centre (a respected legal organization).
这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 是shì shì 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 、、 、 可信kě xìn kě xìn 的de de 来源lái yuán lái yuán ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 。。 。
These are mainstream, credible sources rather than partisan advocacy organizations.
对duì duì 科拉kē lā kē lā 里lǐ lǐ 的de de ABCABC ABC 采访cǎi fǎng cǎi fǎng 和hé hé 关于guān yú guān yú 此案cǐ àn cǐ àn 的de de 新闻报道xīn wén bào dào xīn wén bào dào 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 了le le 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 最受zuì shòu zuì shòu 信任xìn rèn xìn rèn 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 机构jī gòu jī gòu 的de de 一手yī shǒu yī shǒu 来源lái yuán lái yuán [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The ABC interviews with Collaery and journalism reporting on the case represent primary sources from Australia's most trusted news organization [1].
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做过zuò guò zuò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng ?? ?
**Did Labor do something similar?** Search conducted: "Labor government journalist prosecution media cases espionage act Australia" **Finding:** While Labor governments have had intelligence and security controversies (such as the David McBride whistleblower case which began under Coalition but continued under Labor), a direct equivalent to the Collaery prosecution—prosecuting a lawyer for representing a client's interests based on whistleblower disclosures—is not found in historical precedent.
** * ** *
The McBride case (Afghanistan war crimes whistleblower) and Richard Boyle case (tax office misconduct whistleblower) both involve Labor's continuation or handling of Coalition-era prosecutions, not equivalent new prosecutions initiated by Labor [5].
搜索sōu suǒ sōu suǒ :: : "" " 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 记者jì zhě jì zhě 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 案件àn jiàn àn jiàn 间谍jiàn dié jiàn dié 法fǎ fǎ 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà "" "
However, it should be noted that the Collaery prosecution was initiated by the Coalition and the secrecy framework was applied by Coalition attorneys-general (Brandis, Porter).
** * ** * 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn :: : ** * ** * 虽然suī rán suī rán 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 有过yǒu guò yǒu guò 情报qíng bào qíng bào 和hé hé 安全ān quán ān quán 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì (( ( 如rú rú 始于shǐ yú shǐ yú 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 时期shí qī shí qī 但dàn dàn 在zài zài 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 时期shí qī shí qī 继续jì xù jì xù 的de de 大卫dà wèi dà wèi ·· · 麦克mài kè mài kè 布莱德bù lái dé bù lái dé 举报人jǔ bào rén jǔ bào rén 案àn àn )) ) ,, , 但dàn dàn 未找到wèi zhǎo dào wèi zhǎo dào 与yǔ yǔ 科拉kē lā kē lā 里lǐ lǐ 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 等同děng tóng děng tóng 的de de 案例àn lì àn lì —— — —— — 即jí jí 根据gēn jù gēn jù 举报人jǔ bào rén jǔ bào rén 披露pī lù pī lù 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù 律师lǜ shī lǜ shī 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 客户kè hù kè hù 利益lì yì lì yì 。。 。
Labor's Mark Dreyfus ended the prosecution in 2024 [3], suggesting a different approach rather than Labor equivalency.
麦克mài kè mài kè 布莱德bù lái dé bù lái dé 案àn àn (( ( 阿富汗ā fù hàn ā fù hàn 战争zhàn zhēng zhàn zhēng 罪行zuì xíng zuì xíng 举报人jǔ bào rén jǔ bào rén )) ) 和hé hé 理查德lǐ chá dé lǐ chá dé ·· · 博伊尔bó yī ěr bó yī ěr 案àn àn (( ( 税务局shuì wù jú shuì wù jú 不当bù dàng bù dàng 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi 举报人jǔ bào rén jǔ bào rén )) ) 都dōu dōu 涉及shè jí shè jí 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 对duì duì 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 时代shí dài shí dài 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù 的de de 继续jì xù jì xù 或huò huò 处理chǔ lǐ chǔ lǐ ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 发起fā qǐ fā qǐ 的de de 等同děng tóng děng tóng 新xīn xīn 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 应yīng yīng 注意zhù yì zhù yì 科拉kē lā kē lā 里lǐ lǐ 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù 是shì shì 由yóu yóu 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 发起fā qǐ fā qǐ 的de de ,, , 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 由yóu yóu 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 总zǒng zǒng 检察长jiǎn chá zhǎng jiǎn chá zhǎng (( ( 布兰迪斯bù lán dí sī bù lán dí sī 、、 、 波特bō tè bō tè )) ) 适用shì yòng shì yòng 。。 。
工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 的de de 马克mǎ kè mǎ kè ·· · 德dé dé 雷福斯léi fú sī léi fú sī 于yú yú 20242024 2024 年nián nián 终止zhōng zhǐ zhōng zhǐ 了le le 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] ,, , 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 采取cǎi qǔ cǎi qǔ 的de de 是shì shì 不同bù tóng bù tóng 方法fāng fǎ fāng fǎ 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 的de de 等同děng tóng děng tóng 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng (( ( 所述suǒ shù suǒ shù 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu )) ) :: : ** * ** *
**The government's position (stated justification):** The Coalition government argued that public disclosure of ASIS methods and operations could enable foreign intelligence agencies to "construct an intelligible mosaic" of Australian intelligence techniques [3].
联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 辩称biàn chēng biàn chēng ,, , 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 披露pī lù pī lù ASISASIS ASIS 方法fāng fǎ fāng fǎ 和hé hé 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 可能kě néng kě néng 使shǐ shǐ 外国wài guó wài guó 情报机构qíng bào jī gòu qíng bào jī gòu "" " 构建gòu jiàn gòu jiàn 可kě kě 理解lǐ jiě lǐ jiě 的de de 情报qíng bào qíng bào 拼图pīn tú pīn tú "" " [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
Under the National Security Information Act, judges were required to give "greatest weight" to the attorney-general's opinion on national security matters [4]. **Critical analysis of the secrecy argument:** However, the disclosed information related to a single intelligence operation conducted in 2004 in a single location—18 years prior to the prosecution decision.
根据gēn jù gēn jù 《《 《 国家guó jiā guó jiā 安全ān quán ān quán 信息xìn xī xìn xī 法fǎ fǎ 》》 》 ,, , 法官fǎ guān fǎ guān 被bèi bèi 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 对duì duì 总zǒng zǒng 检察长jiǎn chá zhǎng jiǎn chá zhǎng 关于guān yú guān yú 国家guó jiā guó jiā 安全ān quán ān quán 事项shì xiàng shì xiàng 的de de 意见yì jiàn yì jiàn 给予jǐ yǔ jǐ yǔ "" " 最大zuì dà zuì dà 权重quán zhòng quán zhòng "" " [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
Contemporary intelligence analysts would struggle to extract useful current methodology from 2004 techniques [3].
** * ** * 对duì duì 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì 论据lùn jù lùn jù 的de de 批判性pī pàn xìng pī pàn xìng 分析fēn xī fēn xī :: : ** * ** *
This undermines the stated rationale: if the methods and locations were truly a national security concern, why did the government not seek to remove the ABC articles from the internet or charge the journalists who originally published the information?
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 所suǒ suǒ 披露pī lù pī lù 的de de 信息xìn xī xìn xī 涉及shè jí shè jí 20042004 2004 年nián nián 在zài zài 单一dān yī dān yī 地点dì diǎn dì diǎn 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 的de de 单一dān yī dān yī 情报qíng bào qíng bào 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng —— — —— — 距jù jù 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù 决定jué dìng jué dìng 已有yǐ yǒu yǐ yǒu 1818 18 年nián nián 。。 。
The articles remained publicly available throughout [1]. **The Alice-in-Wonderland inversion:** As multiple legal experts noted, the case represented a fundamental inversion of accountability [2][3].
当代dāng dài dāng dài 情报qíng bào qíng bào 分析师fēn xī shī fēn xī shī 很难hěn nán hěn nán 从cóng cóng 20042004 2004 年nián nián 的de de 技术jì shù jì shù 中zhōng zhōng 提取tí qǔ tí qǔ 有用yǒu yòng yǒu yòng 的de de 当前dāng qián dāng qián 方法fāng fǎ fāng fǎ [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
The individuals who disclosed alleged government unlawfulness were prosecuted, while government officials who authorized the illegal bugging operation faced no charges [3].
这zhè zhè 削弱xuē ruò xuē ruò 了le le 所述suǒ shù suǒ shù 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu :: : 如果rú guǒ rú guǒ 方法fāng fǎ fāng fǎ 和hé hé 地点dì diǎn dì diǎn 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 构成gòu chéng gòu chéng 国家guó jiā guó jiā 安全ān quán ān quán 关切guān qiè guān qiè ,, , 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 为何wèi hé wèi hé 未wèi wèi 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 从cóng cóng 互联网hù lián wǎng hù lián wǎng 上shàng shàng 删除shān chú shān chú ABCABC ABC 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 或huò huò 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù 最初zuì chū zuì chū 发布fā bù fā bù 信息xìn xī xìn xī 的de de 记者jì zhě jì zhě ?? ?
The spying itself—bugging a friendly nation's cabinet for commercial advantage—appears to constitute potential violations of both Australian and international law. **National interest disclosure vs. legal form:** Collaery and Witness K acted to expose what they believed was illegal government conduct.
这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 始终保持shǐ zhōng bǎo chí shǐ zhōng bǎo chí 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
While the Intelligence Services Act section 39 contains no public interest defense, the High Court has recognized an implied constitutional right to freedom of political communication.
** * ** * 爱丽丝ài lì sī ài lì sī 梦游mèng yóu mèng yóu 仙境xiān jìng xiān jìng 式shì shì 的de de 颠倒diān dǎo diān dǎo :: : ** * ** *
Legal scholars argued the case represented a direct assault on this constitutional protection [2]. **Legitimacy of government claims versus public accountability:** The government's argument essentially boiled down to: "We conducted operations that our own government likely found legally questionable, so we must prosecute those who disclosed them—in secret, so we don't have to publicly admit what we did" [4][5].
正如zhèng rú zhèng rú 多位duō wèi duō wèi 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 所suǒ suǒ 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū 的de de ,, , 该案gāi àn gāi àn 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 了le le 问责制wèn zé zhì wèn zé zhì 的de de 根本gēn běn gēn běn 颠倒diān dǎo diān dǎo [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
This approach conflicts with democratic principles of public justice and governmental accountability. **Key context:** This prosecution is **not typical of government practice across parties.** No Australian government has previously prosecuted a lawyer for representing a client's interests based on intelligence disclosures.
披露pī lù pī lù 所谓suǒ wèi suǒ wèi 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 违法行为wéi fǎ xíng wéi wéi fǎ xíng wéi 的de de 个人gè rén gè rén 被bèi bèi 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù ,, , 而ér ér 授权shòu quán shòu quán 非法fēi fǎ fēi fǎ 窃听qiè tīng qiè tīng 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 的de de 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 官员guān yuán guān yuán 未wèi wèi 面临miàn lín miàn lín 任何rèn hé rèn hé 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
The legal framework (National Security Information Act) is applied differently by different governments.
间谍jiàn dié jiàn dié 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi 本身běn shēn běn shēn —— — —— — 为wèi wèi 商业利益shāng yè lì yì shāng yè lì yì 窃听qiè tīng qiè tīng 友好yǒu hǎo yǒu hǎo 国家guó jiā guó jiā 内阁nèi gé nèi gé —— — —— — 似乎sì hū sì hū 构成gòu chéng gòu chéng 对duì duì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 和hé hé 国际法guó jì fǎ guó jì fǎ 的de de 潜在qián zài qián zài 违反wéi fǎn wéi fǎn 。。 。
Labor's decision to discontinue the prosecution demonstrates this is not standard prosecutorial practice.
** * ** * 国家guó jiā guó jiā 利益lì yì lì yì 披露pī lù pī lù 与yǔ yǔ 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 形式xíng shì xíng shì :: : ** * ** *
科拉kē lā kē lā 里lǐ lǐ 和hé hé 证人zhèng rén zhèng rén KK K 采取行动cǎi qǔ xíng dòng cǎi qǔ xíng dòng 揭露jiē lù jiē lù 他们tā men tā men 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 的de de 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 违法行为wéi fǎ xíng wéi wéi fǎ xíng wéi 。。 。
虽然suī rán suī rán 《《 《 情报服务qíng bào fú wù qíng bào fú wù 法fǎ fǎ 》》 》 第dì dì 3939 39 条tiáo tiáo 不bù bù 包含bāo hán bāo hán 公共利益gōng gòng lì yì gōng gòng lì yì 辩护biàn hù biàn hù ,, , 但dàn dàn 高等法院gāo děng fǎ yuàn gāo děng fǎ yuàn 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn 隐含yǐn hán yǐn hán 的de de 宪法xiàn fǎ xiàn fǎ 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 交流jiāo liú jiāo liú 自由权zì yóu quán zì yóu quán 。。 。
法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 学者xué zhě xué zhě 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 该案gāi àn gāi àn 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 对duì duì 这zhè zhè 一yī yī 宪法xiàn fǎ xiàn fǎ 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 的de de 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 攻击gōng jī gōng jī [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 的de de 合法性hé fǎ xìng hé fǎ xìng 与yǔ yǔ 公共gōng gòng gōng gòng 问责wèn zé wèn zé :: : ** * ** *
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 论点lùn diǎn lùn diǎn 实质shí zhì shí zhì 上shàng shàng 归结为guī jié wèi guī jié wèi :: : "" " 我们wǒ men wǒ men 执行zhí xíng zhí xíng 了le le 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng ,, , 我们wǒ men wǒ men 自己zì jǐ zì jǐ 的de de 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 可能kě néng kě néng 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 在zài zài 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 上shàng shàng 存疑cún yí cún yí ,, , 所以suǒ yǐ suǒ yǐ 我们wǒ men wǒ men 必须bì xū bì xū 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù 披露pī lù pī lù 它们tā men tā men 的de de 人rén rén —— — —— — 秘密mì mì mì mì 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng ,, , 这样zhè yàng zhè yàng 我们wǒ men wǒ men 就jiù jiù 不必bù bì bù bì 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn 我们wǒ men wǒ men 做zuò zuò 了le le 什么shén me shén me "" " [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 方法fāng fǎ fāng fǎ 与yǔ yǔ 公共gōng gòng gōng gòng 正义zhèng yì zhèng yì 和hé hé 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 问责wèn zé wèn zé 的de de 民主mín zhǔ mín zhǔ 原则yuán zé yuán zé 相冲突xiāng chōng tū xiāng chōng tū 。。 。
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng :: : ** * ** * 此cǐ cǐ 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù ** * ** * 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 跨kuà kuà 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 惯例guàn lì guàn lì 的de de 典型diǎn xíng diǎn xíng 。。 。
** * ** * 此前cǐ qián cǐ qián 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 澳大利亚政府ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ 根据gēn jù gēn jù 情报qíng bào qíng bào 披露pī lù pī lù 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù 律师lǜ shī lǜ shī 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 客户kè hù kè hù 利益lì yì lì yì 。。 。
法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià (( ( 《《 《 国家guó jiā guó jiā 安全ān quán ān quán 信息xìn xī xìn xī 法fǎ fǎ 》》 》 )) ) 由yóu yóu 不同bù tóng bù tóng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 以yǐ yǐ 不同bù tóng bù tóng 方式fāng shì fāng shì 适用shì yòng shì yòng 。。 。
工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 决定jué dìng jué dìng 终止zhōng zhǐ zhōng zhǐ 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 这zhè zhè 不是bú shì bú shì 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 的de de 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ 。。 。

部分属实

7.0

/ 10

核心hé xīn hé xīn 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng 基本jī běn jī běn 属实shǔ shí shǔ shí :: : 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 试图shì tú shì tú 对duì duì 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì 上诉shàng sù shàng sù 中zhōng zhōng 提出tí chū tí chū 的de de 论点lùn diǎn lùn diǎn 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì ,, , 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng 了解liǎo jiě liǎo jiě 审判shěn pàn shěn pàn 为何wèi hé wèi hé 应yīng yīng 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
The core claim is substantially true: the government did seek to keep secret the arguments made in the secrecy appeal, preventing public knowledge of why the trial should be secret [1][5].
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 因yīn yīn 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 的de de 公共利益gōng gòng lì yì gōng gòng lì yì 披露pī lù pī lù 而ér ér 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù 某人mǒu rén mǒu rén [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The government did prosecute someone for truthful public-interest disclosure [1][2].
尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 国家guó jiā guó jiā 安全ān quán ān quán 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng ,, , 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 仍réng réng 保持bǎo chí bǎo chí 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The original articles remain public despite national security claims [1].
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 该gāi gāi 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng 需要xū yào xū yào 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng :: :
However, the claim requires important context: 1.
11 1 .. . 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 官员guān yuán guān yuán 未wèi wèi 面临miàn lín miàn lín 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng ,, , 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 问责wèn zé wèn zé 机制jī zhì jī zhì 从未cóng wèi cóng wèi 达到dá dào dá dào 那nà nà 一点yì diǎn yì diǎn —— — —— — 对duì duì 科拉kē lā kē lā 里lǐ lǐ 的de de 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù 旨在zhǐ zài zhǐ zài 压制yā zhì yā zhì 披露pī lù pī lù 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi 者zhě zhě 。。 。
The government officials did not face charges because the legal accountability mechanism never reached that point—the prosecution of Collaery was meant to suppress the disclosure rather than prosecute the original actors. 2.
22 2 .. . 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng 的de de 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 忽略hū lüè hū lüè 了le le 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 突击tū jī tū jī 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 中zhōng zhōng 可能kě néng kě néng 违反wéi fǎn wéi fǎn 国际法guó jì fǎ guó jì fǎ 和hé hé 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 职业zhí yè zhí yè 特权tè quán tè quán ,, , 且qiě qiě 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 违规wéi guī wéi guī 未wèi wèi 通过tōng guò tōng guò 对duì duì 官员guān yuán guān yuán 的de de 刑事xíng shì xíng shì 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù 得到dé dào dé dào 解决jiě jué jiě jué 。。 。
The claim's framing omits that the government likely violated international law and legal professional privilege in conducting the raids, and that these violations were not addressed through criminal prosecutions of officials. 3.
33 3 .. . 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù 于yú yú 20242024 2024 年nián nián 由yóu yóu 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 的de de 马克mǎ kè mǎ kè ·· · 德dé dé 雷福斯léi fú sī léi fú sī 终止zhōng zhǐ zhōng zhǐ ,, , 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 该案gāi àn gāi àn 缺乏quē fá quē fá 继续jì xù jì xù 追诉zhuī sù zhuī sù 的de de 充分chōng fèn chōng fèn 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 或huò huò 道德dào dé dào dé 基础jī chǔ jī chǔ 。。 。
The prosecution was discontinuing in 2024 by Labor's Mark Dreyfus, indicating the case lacked sufficient legal or moral foundation for continued pursuit. 4.
44 4 .. . 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 异常yì cháng yì cháng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn —— — —— — 不仅bù jǐn bù jǐn 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 情报qíng bào qíng bào 方法fāng fǎ fāng fǎ ,, , 还hái hái 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng 了解liǎo jiě liǎo jiě 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 对duì duì 其qí qí 自身zì shēn zì shēn 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi 的de de 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn 。。 。
The secrecy framework was extraordinarily broad—not just protecting intelligence methods, but preventing public knowledge of government admissions of its own conduct.
该gāi gāi 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 描述miáo shù miáo shù 了le le 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 越权yuè quán yuè quán 和hé hé 对duì duì 合法hé fǎ hé fǎ 公共利益gōng gòng lì yì gōng gòng lì yì 披露pī lù pī lù 的de de 压制yā zhì yā zhì ,, , 但dàn dàn 完整wán zhěng wán zhěng 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 揭示jiē shì jiē shì 了le le 一个yí gè yí gè 根本gēn běn gēn běn 关于guān yú guān yú 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 问责wèn zé wèn zé 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 国家guó jiā guó jiā 安全ān quán ān quán 的de de 案件àn jiàn àn jiàn 。。 。
The claim accurately captures government overreach and the suppression of legitimate public-interest disclosure, but the full context reveals a case fundamentally about preventing government accountability rather than protecting genuine national security.

📚 来源与引用 (7)

  1. 1
    abc.net.au

    abc.net.au

    The Canberra lawyer on official secrets charges continues to fight to have his hearing held in open court.

    Media Watch
  2. 2
    sbs.com.au

    sbs.com.au

    The lawyer and his client, Witness K, are accused of disclosing information related to a covert ASIS spying operation. These are the legal issues that are likely to be raised at trial.

    SBS News
  3. 3
    theconversation.com

    theconversation.com

    The prosecution was a scandal and should never have been commenced. It was a direct assault upon freedom of political communication, and it intimidated whistleblowers.

    The Conversation
  4. 4
    hrlc.org.au

    hrlc.org.au

    Secret evidence, secret hearings and secret judgements. Each step in the prosecution of Bernard Collaery comes with another layer of opacity. If it were not so serious, the accumulation of secrecy in this case would be comedic.

    Human Rights Law Centre
  5. 5
    bbc.com

    bbc.com

    Bernard Collaery is a hero in East Timor, but faced prosecution in Australia for revealing a spy mission.

    Bbc
  6. 6
    laohamutuk.org

    laohamutuk.org

    Laohamutuk

  7. 7
    timor-leste.gov.tl

    timor-leste.gov.tl

    The official Timor-Leste government website, Media Releases

    Timor-leste Gov

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。