部分属实

评分: 6.0/10

Coalition
C0978

声明内容

“削减学生、老年人和家庭的30亿澳元福利。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis
分析时间: 3 Feb 2026

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 指zhǐ zhǐ 的de de 是shì shì AbbottAbbott Abbott 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 于yú yú 20142014 2014 年nián nián 55 5 月yuè yuè 1313 13 日rì rì 公布gōng bù gōng bù 的de de 第一个dì yí gè dì yí gè 预算案yù suàn àn yù suàn àn 中zhōng zhōng 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 的de de 福利fú lì fú lì 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The claim refers to welfare changes announced in the Abbott government's first budget delivered on 13 May 2014 [1].
20142014 2014 年nián nián 预算yù suàn yù suàn 是shì shì CoalitionCoalition Coalition 在zài zài 20132013 2013 年nián nián 澳大利亚联邦ào dà lì yà lián bāng ào dà lì yà lián bāng 大选dà xuǎn dà xuǎn 中zhōng zhōng 获胜huò shèng huò shèng 后hòu hòu 提交tí jiāo tí jiāo 的de de 第一份dì yī fèn dì yī fèn 预算案yù suàn àn yù suàn àn [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The 2014 budget was the first delivered by the Abbott government following the Coalition's victory in the 2013 Australian federal election [2].
该gāi gāi 预算案yù suàn àn yù suàn àn 对duì duì 福利制度fú lì zhì dù fú lì zhì dù 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 了le le 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé ,, , 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò :: :
The budget featured significant changes to welfare, including: **Family Payments:** - Family Tax Benefit Part B income threshold reduced to $100,000 [3] - Family Tax Benefit rates frozen for two years [3] - Families cease being eligible for Family Tax Benefit Part B when their youngest child turns six [3] - The Schoolkids Bonus was abolished [2] **Pension Changes:** - From September 2017, pension increases would be linked to inflation rather than male average earnings [2] - Asset and income test thresholds would be indexed until 2017, then remain fixed for three years [3] - The pension age would gradually increase to 70 by 2035 (building on Labor's previous increase to 67 by 2023) [2][3] - The annual Seniors Supplement was abolished from 1 July 2014 [2] **Youth and Student Welfare:** - Newstart Allowance would not be available to people under 25 [2] - Unemployed people under 30 would have to wait six months before receiving unemployment benefits [2][3] - The First Home Saver Accounts scheme was abolished, saving $134.3 million [2] - Higher education funding was cut by $4.7 billion over four years [2] - HECS repayment thresholds lowered and interest rates changed [2] While the specific "$3 billion" figure is difficult to verify from primary sources, the budget papers indicate total budget repair efforts of $36 billion over five years, with more than three-quarters coming from spending cuts [2][4].
** * ** * 家庭jiā tíng jiā tíng 津贴jīn tiē jīn tiē :: : ** * ** *
Welfare changes were a significant component of these savings.
-- - 家庭jiā tíng jiā tíng 税收shuì shōu shuì shōu 福利fú lì fú lì BB B 部分bù fèn bù fèn 的de de 收入shōu rù shōu rù 门槛mén kǎn mén kǎn 降至jiàng zhì jiàng zhì 1010 10 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
-- - 家庭jiā tíng jiā tíng 税收shuì shōu shuì shōu 福利费fú lì fèi fú lì fèi 率lǜ lǜ 冻结dòng jié dòng jié 两年liǎng nián liǎng nián [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
-- - 当dāng dāng 家庭jiā tíng jiā tíng 中zhōng zhōng 最小zuì xiǎo zuì xiǎo 的de de 孩子hái zi hái zi 满mǎn mǎn 六岁时liù suì shí liù suì shí ,, , 家庭jiā tíng jiā tíng 将jiāng jiāng 不再bù zài bù zài 有yǒu yǒu 资格zī gé zī gé 领取lǐng qǔ lǐng qǔ 家庭jiā tíng jiā tíng 税收shuì shōu shuì shōu 福利fú lì fú lì BB B 部分bù fèn bù fèn [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
-- - 学生xué shēng xué shēng 津贴jīn tiē jīn tiē 奖金jiǎng jīn jiǎng jīn 被bèi bèi 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
** * ** * 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé :: : ** * ** *
-- - 从cóng cóng 20172017 2017 年nián nián 99 9 月yuè yuè 起qǐ qǐ ,, , 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn 增长zēng zhǎng zēng zhǎng 将jiāng jiāng 与yǔ yǔ 通货膨胀tōng huò péng zhàng tōng huò péng zhàng 挂钩guà gōu guà gōu ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 男性nán xìng nán xìng 平均收入píng jūn shōu rù píng jūn shōu rù [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
-- - 资产zī chǎn zī chǎn 和hé hé 收入shōu rù shōu rù 测试cè shì cè shì 门槛mén kǎn mén kǎn 将jiāng jiāng 一直yì zhí yì zhí 按àn àn 指数zhǐ shù zhǐ shù 调整tiáo zhěng tiáo zhěng 至zhì zhì 20172017 2017 年nián nián ,, , 然后rán hòu rán hòu 固定gù dìng gù dìng 三年sān nián sān nián [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
-- - 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn 年龄nián líng nián líng 将jiāng jiāng 逐步提高zhú bù tí gāo zhú bù tí gāo 到dào dào 20352035 2035 年nián nián 达到dá dào dá dào 7070 70 岁suì suì (( ( 在zài zài LaborLabor Labor 此前cǐ qián cǐ qián 提高tí gāo tí gāo 到dào dào 20232023 2023 年nián nián 达到dá dào dá dào 6767 67 岁suì suì 的de de 基础jī chǔ jī chǔ 上shàng shàng )) ) [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
-- - 年度nián dù nián dù 老年人lǎo nián rén lǎo nián rén 补贴bǔ tiē bǔ tiē 从cóng cóng 20142014 2014 年nián nián 77 7 月yuè yuè 11 1 日起rì qǐ rì qǐ 被bèi bèi 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
** * ** * 青年qīng nián qīng nián 和hé hé 学生xué shēng xué shēng 福利fú lì fú lì :: : ** * ** *
-- - 2525 25 岁suì suì 以下yǐ xià yǐ xià 人员rén yuán rén yuán 将jiāng jiāng 无法wú fǎ wú fǎ 领取lǐng qǔ lǐng qǔ 新起点xīn qǐ diǎn xīn qǐ diǎn 津贴jīn tiē jīn tiē [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
-- - 3030 30 岁suì suì 以下yǐ xià yǐ xià 失业者shī yè zhě shī yè zhě 需xū xū 等待děng dài děng dài 六个月liù gè yuè liù gè yuè 才能cái néng cái néng 领取lǐng qǔ lǐng qǔ 失业shī yè shī yè 救济金jiù jì jīn jiù jì jīn [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
-- - 首次shǒu cì shǒu cì 购房gòu fáng gòu fáng 储蓄chǔ xù chǔ xù 账户zhàng hù zhàng hù 计划jì huà jì huà 被bèi bèi 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo ,, , 节省jié shěng jié shěng 1.3431.343 1.343 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
-- - 高等教育gāo děng jiào yù gāo děng jiào yù 经费jīng fèi jīng fèi 在zài zài 四年sì nián sì nián 内nèi nèi 被bèi bèi 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 4747 47 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
-- - 高等教育gāo děng jiào yù gāo děng jiào yù 贷款dài kuǎn dài kuǎn 还款hái kuǎn hái kuǎn 门槛mén kǎn mén kǎn 降低jiàng dī jiàng dī ,, , 利率lì lǜ lì lǜ 发生变化fā shēng biàn huà fā shēng biàn huà [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
虽然suī rán suī rán 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 的de de "" " 3030 30 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán "" " 数字shù zì shù zì 难以nán yǐ nán yǐ 从cóng cóng 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 资料zī liào zī liào 中zhōng zhōng 核实hé shí hé shí ,, , 但dàn dàn 预算yù suàn yù suàn 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì ,, , 五年wǔ nián wǔ nián 内nèi nèi 的de de 预算yù suàn yù suàn 修复xiū fù xiū fù 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 总额zǒng é zǒng é 为wèi wèi 360360 360 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán ,, , 其中qí zhōng qí zhōng 超过chāo guò chāo guò 四分之三sì fēn zhī sān sì fēn zhī sān 来自lái zì lái zì 支出zhī chū zhī chū 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
福利fú lì fú lì 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 是shì shì 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 节省jié shěng jié shěng 的de de 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 组成部分zǔ chéng bù fèn zǔ chéng bù fèn 。。 。

缺失背景

该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 的de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 因素yīn sù yīn sù :: :
The claim omits several important contextual factors: **Budget Context:** The government inherited a projected deficit of $49.9 billion for 2013-14 and gross debt projected to reach $667 billion [3].
** * ** * 预算yù suàn yù suàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng :: : ** * ** *
The budget measures were framed as necessary to address what the government described as a structural budget problem [3]. **The "Budget Emergency" Controversy:** The government's characterisation of a "budget emergency" was disputed by 63 leading economists who signed the "Economists' Statement on Commonwealth Budgetary and Economic Priorities" in September 2014 [5][6].
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 继承jì chéng jì chéng 了le le 20132013 2013 -- - 1414 14 财年cái nián cái nián 499499 499 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 的de de 预计yù jì yù jì 赤字chì zì chì zì 和hé hé 预计yù jì yù jì 达到dá dào dá dào 66706670 6670 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 的de de 总zǒng zǒng 债务zhài wù zhài wù [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
The economists argued that "Australia's debt and deficit is closer to trivial than dangerous" when compared to other OECD countries [5]. **Comparative Economic Position:** Australia's net public debt at approximately 15% of GDP was significantly lower than many comparable nations.
这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 预算yù suàn yù suàn 措施cuò shī cuò shī 被bèi bèi 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 框定kuāng dìng kuāng dìng 为wèi wèi 解决jiě jué jiě jué 结构性jié gòu xìng jié gòu xìng 预算yù suàn yù suàn 问题wèn tí wèn tí 所suǒ suǒ 必需bì xū bì xū 的de de [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
As economist Saul Eslake noted, Britain faced a deficit of 10% of GDP and net public debt exceeding 60% of GDP in 2010 - to apply similar "crisis" terminology to Australia's position was "to abuse the English language" [6]. **Some Higher Income Earners Also Affected:** The budget introduced a 2% "Temporary Budget Repair Levy" on individuals earning over $180,000, expected to raise $3.1 billion over four years [2][3].
** * ** * "" " 预算yù suàn yù suàn 紧急状态jǐn jí zhuàng tài jǐn jí zhuàng tài "" " 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì :: : ** * ** *
This represented a contribution from higher-income Australians, though the claim focuses only on cuts affecting students, elderly and families.
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 将jiāng jiāng 财政状况cái zhèng zhuàng kuàng cái zhèng zhuàng kuàng 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为wèi wèi "" " 预算yù suàn yù suàn 紧急状态jǐn jí zhuàng tài jǐn jí zhuàng tài "" " ,, , 这一zhè yī zhè yī 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 受到shòu dào shòu dào 6363 63 位wèi wèi 顶尖dǐng jiān dǐng jiān 经济学家jīng jì xué jiā jīng jì xué jiā 的de de 质疑zhì yí zhì yí ,, , 他们tā men tā men 于yú yú 20142014 2014 年nián nián 99 9 月yuè yuè 签署qiān shǔ qiān shǔ 了le le 《《 《 关于guān yú guān yú 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 预算yù suàn yù suàn 和hé hé 经济jīng jì jīng jì 优先yōu xiān yōu xiān 事项shì xiàng shì xiàng 的de de 经济学家jīng jì xué jiā jīng jì xué jiā 声明shēng míng shēng míng 》》 》 [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 经济学家jīng jì xué jiā jīng jì xué jiā 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi ,, , "" " 与yǔ yǔ 其他qí tā qí tā OECDOECD OECD 国家guó jiā guó jiā 相比xiāng bǐ xiāng bǐ ,, , 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 的de de 债务zhài wù zhài wù 和hé hé 赤字chì zì chì zì 更gèng gèng 接近jiē jìn jiē jìn 微不足道wēi bù zú dào wēi bù zú dào 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 危险wēi xiǎn wēi xiǎn "" " [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 相对xiāng duì xiāng duì 经济jīng jì jīng jì 地位dì wèi dì wèi :: : ** * ** *
澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 净jìng jìng 公共gōng gòng gōng gòng 债务zhài wù zhài wù 约yuē yuē 占zhàn zhàn GDPGDP GDP 的de de 15%15% 15% ,, , 明显míng xiǎn míng xiǎn 低于dī yú dī yú 许多xǔ duō xǔ duō 可比kě bǐ kě bǐ 国家guó jiā guó jiā 。。 。
正如zhèng rú zhèng rú 经济学家jīng jì xué jiā jīng jì xué jiā SaulSaul Saul EslakeEslake Eslake 所suǒ suǒ 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū 的de de ,, , 英国yīng guó yīng guó 在zài zài 20102010 2010 年nián nián 面临miàn lín miàn lín GDPGDP GDP 10%10% 10% 的de de 赤字chì zì chì zì 和hé hé 超过chāo guò chāo guò GDPGDP GDP 60%60% 60% 的de de 净jìng jìng 公共gōng gòng gōng gòng 债务zhài wù zhài wù —— — —— — 将jiāng jiāng 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de "" " 危机wēi jī wēi jī "" " 措辞cuò cí cuò cí 用于yòng yú yòng yú 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 的de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 是shì shì "" " 滥用làn yòng làn yòng 英语yīng yǔ yīng yǔ "" " [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 部分bù fèn bù fèn 高收入者gāo shōu rù zhě gāo shōu rù zhě 也yě yě 受到shòu dào shòu dào 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng :: : ** * ** *
预算yù suàn yù suàn 对duì duì 年收入nián shōu rù nián shōu rù 超过chāo guò chāo guò 1818 18 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 的de de 个人gè rén gè rén 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù 了le le 2%2% 2% 的de de "" " 临时lín shí lín shí 预算yù suàn yù suàn 修复xiū fù xiū fù 税shuì shuì "" " ,, , 预计yù jì yù jì 在zài zài 四年sì nián sì nián 内nèi nèi 筹集chóu jí chóu jí 3131 31 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
这zhè zhè 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 了le le 高gāo gāo 收入shōu rù shōu rù 澳大利亚人ào dà lì yà rén ào dà lì yà rén 的de de 贡献gòng xiàn gòng xiàn ,, , 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 仅jǐn jǐn 关注guān zhù guān zhù 对duì duì 学生xué shēng xué shēng 、、 、 老年人lǎo nián rén lǎo nián rén 和hé hé 家庭jiā tíng jiā tíng 的de de 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 。。 。

来源可信度评估

** * ** * TheThe The CourierCourier Courier -- - MailMail Mail (( ( 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 集团jí tuán jí tuán 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà )) ) :: : ** * ** *
**The Courier-Mail (News Corp Australia):** The first source is from The Courier-Mail, a mainstream Australian newspaper owned by News Corp Australia.
第一个dì yí gè dì yí gè 来源lái yuán lái yuán 是shì shì TheThe The CourierCourier Courier -- - MailMail Mail ,, , 这是zhè shì zhè shì 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 集团jí tuán jí tuán 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 旗下qí xià qí xià 的de de 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 报纸bào zhǐ bào zhǐ 。。 。
While generally reliable for factual reporting, News Corp publications have been described as having a centre-right editorial stance.
虽然suī rán suī rán 在zài zài 事实shì shí shì shí 报道bào dào bào dào 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 可靠kě kào kě kào ,, , 但dàn dàn 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 集团jí tuán jí tuán 的de de 出版物chū bǎn wù chū bǎn wù 被bèi bèi 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为持wèi chí wèi chí 中间zhōng jiān zhōng jiān 偏右piān yòu piān yòu 的de de 编辑biān jí biān jí 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 。。 。
The specific article referenced (from 2014) would need to be verified for its reporting accuracy. **The Guardian Australia:** The second source is The Guardian Australia, which has a centre-left editorial stance.
引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 的de de 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng (( ( 20142014 2014 年nián nián )) ) 需要xū yào xū yào 核实hé shí hé shí 其qí qí 报道bào dào bào dào 准确性zhǔn què xìng zhǔn què xìng 。。 。
The article references the economists' statement disputing the "budget emergency" narrative.
** * ** * TheThe The GuardianGuardian Guardian AustraliaAustralia Australia :: : ** * ** *
The Guardian is generally regarded as a reputable news source, though like all sources, should be cross-referenced.
第二个dì èr gè dì èr gè 来源lái yuán lái yuán 是shì shì TheThe The GuardianGuardian Guardian AustraliaAustralia Australia ,, , 持chí chí 中间zhōng jiān zhōng jiān 偏左piān zuǒ piān zuǒ 的de de 编辑biān jí biān jí 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 。。 。
Both sources appear to be mainstream media outlets rather than partisan advocacy organisations, though readers should be aware of their respective editorial leanings.
该gāi gāi 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 了le le 经济学家jīng jì xué jiā jīng jì xué jiā 质疑zhì yí zhì yí "" " 预算yù suàn yù suàn 紧急状态jǐn jí zhuàng tài jǐn jí zhuàng tài "" " 叙事xù shì xù shì 的de de 声明shēng míng shēng míng 。。 。
TheThe The GuardianGuardian Guardian 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 被bèi bèi 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 是shì shì 可靠kě kào kě kào 的de de 新闻来源xīn wén lái yuán xīn wén lái yuán ,, , 但dàn dàn 像xiàng xiàng 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 来源lái yuán lái yuán 一样yī yàng yī yàng ,, , 应当yīng dāng yīng dāng 交叉jiāo chā jiāo chā 验证yàn zhèng yàn zhèng 。。 。
两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 来源lái yuán lái yuán 似乎sì hū sì hū 都dōu dōu 是shì shì 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī ,, , 但dàn dàn 读者dú zhě dú zhě 应yīng yīng 注意zhù yì zhù yì 其qí qí 各自gè zì gè zì 的de de 编辑biān jí biān jí 倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng 。。 。
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做过zuò guò zuò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng ?? ?
**Did Labor do something similar?** The Rudd/Gillard Labor governments (2007-2013) also implemented significant welfare changes and cuts: 1. **Single Parent Welfare Cuts (2013):** The Gillard government moved approximately 80,000 single parents from the Parenting Payment Single onto the lower Newstart Allowance, saving an estimated $728 million over four years [7].
** * ** *
This affected single parents when their youngest child turned eight. 2. **University Funding Cuts:** The Gillard government cut $2.3 billion from universities in 2013 to fund the Gonski school reforms [7]. 3. **Aged Pension Changes:** The Gillard government increased the pension age from 65 to 67, to be phased in between 2017 and 2023 [8].
RuddRudd Rudd // / GillardGillard Gillard 领导lǐng dǎo lǐng dǎo 的de de LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ (( ( 20072007 2007 -- - 20132013 2013 年nián nián )) ) 也yě yě 实施shí shī shí shī 了le le 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 的de de 福利fú lì fú lì 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 和hé hé 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn :: :
The Abbott government built on this by extending the increase to age 70 by 2035. 4. **Welfare Payment Indexation:** The Gillard government froze some welfare payment indexation during the 2012-13 budget to save $1 billion [9]. 5. **Historical Pattern:** Both major parties have implemented welfare cuts when in government.
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 单亲家庭dān qìng jia tíng dān qìng jia tíng 福利fú lì fú lì 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn (( ( 20132013 2013 年nián nián )) ) :: : ** * ** * GillardGillard Gillard 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 将jiāng jiāng 约yuē yuē 88 8 万wàn wàn 名单míng dān míng dān 亲qīn qīn 家长jiā zhǎng jiā zhǎng 从cóng cóng 单亲dān qīn dān qīn 家长jiā zhǎng jiā zhǎng 津贴jīn tiē jīn tiē 转移zhuǎn yí zhuǎn yí 到dào dào 更gèng gèng 低dī dī 的de de 新起点xīn qǐ diǎn xīn qǐ diǎn 津贴jīn tiē jīn tiē ,, , 预计yù jì yù jì 在zài zài 四年sì nián sì nián 内nèi nèi 节省jié shěng jié shěng 7.287.28 7.28 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。 。
The Howard government (1996-2007) also made significant changes to welfare eligibility and payments. **Key Difference:** The scale and scope of the 2014 budget welfare changes were more extensive than most previous changes, and they came after explicit pre-election promises that "no-one's fortnightly pension or benefit will go down" [1].
这zhè zhè 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 了le le 最zuì zuì 小孩子xiǎo hái zi xiǎo hái zi 满mǎn mǎn 八岁bā suì bā suì 的de de 单亲dān qīn dān qīn 家长jiā zhǎng jiā zhǎng 。。 。
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 大学dà xué dà xué 经费jīng fèi jīng fèi 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn :: : ** * ** * GillardGillard Gillard 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 20132013 2013 年nián nián 从cóng cóng 大学dà xué dà xué 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 2323 23 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán ,, , 用于yòng yú yòng yú 资助zī zhù zī zhù GonskiGonski Gonski 学校xué xiào xué xiào 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。 。
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé :: : ** * ** * GillardGillard Gillard 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 将jiāng jiāng 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn 年龄nián líng nián líng 从cóng cóng 6565 65 岁suì suì 提高tí gāo tí gāo 到dào dào 6767 67 岁suì suì ,, , 将jiāng jiāng 于yú yú 20172017 2017 年nián nián 至zhì zhì 20232023 2023 年nián nián 之间zhī jiān zhī jiān 逐步zhú bù zhú bù 实施shí shī shí shī [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。 。
AbbottAbbott Abbott 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 此基础cǐ jī chǔ cǐ jī chǔ 上shàng shàng 进一步jìn yí bù jìn yí bù 将jiāng jiāng 提高tí gāo tí gāo 年龄nián líng nián líng 延长yán cháng yán cháng 至zhì zhì 20352035 2035 年nián nián 达到dá dào dá dào 7070 70 岁suì suì 。。 。
44 4 .. . ** * ** * 福利金fú lì jīn fú lì jīn 指数化zhǐ shù huà zhǐ shù huà 冻结dòng jié dòng jié :: : ** * ** * GillardGillard Gillard 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 20122012 2012 -- - 1313 13 年度预算nián dù yù suàn nián dù yù suàn 中zhōng zhōng 冻结dòng jié dòng jié 了le le 部分bù fèn bù fèn 福利金fú lì jīn fú lì jīn 的de de 指数化zhǐ shù huà zhǐ shù huà ,, , 以yǐ yǐ 节省jié shěng jié shěng 1010 10 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán [[ [ 99 9 ]] ] 。。 。
55 5 .. . ** * ** * 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ 模式mó shì mó shì :: : ** * ** * 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 在zài zài 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 时shí shí 都dōu dōu 实施shí shī shí shī 过guò guò 福利fú lì fú lì 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 。。 。
HowardHoward Howard 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ (( ( 19961996 1996 -- - 20072007 2007 年nián nián )) ) 也yě yě 对duì duì 福利fú lì fú lì 资格zī gé zī gé 和hé hé 支付zhī fù zhī fù 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 了le le 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 。。 。
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 区别qū bié qū bié :: : ** * ** * 20142014 2014 年nián nián 预算yù suàn yù suàn 福利fú lì fú lì 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 的de de 规模guī mó guī mó 和hé hé 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi 比bǐ bǐ 大多数dà duō shù dà duō shù 以往yǐ wǎng yǐ wǎng 的de de 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 更为gèng wéi gèng wéi 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn ,, , 而且ér qiě ér qiě 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 是shì shì 在zài zài 选前xuǎn qián xuǎn qián 明确míng què míng què 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò "" " 任何人rèn hé rén rèn hé rén 的de de 双周shuāng zhōu shuāng zhōu 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn 或huò huò 福利金fú lì jīn fú lì jīn 都dōu dōu 不会bú huì bú huì 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo "" " 之后zhī hòu zhī hòu 实施shí shī shí shī 的de de [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

20142014 2014 年nián nián 预算yù suàn yù suàn 的de de 福利fú lì fú lì 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 必须bì xū bì xū 从cóng cóng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 既定目标jì dìng mù biāo jì dìng mù biāo 和hé hé 实际shí jì shí jì 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 来lái lái 看待kàn dài kàn dài :: :
The 2014 budget welfare changes must be viewed in the context of both the government's stated objectives and their actual impact: **Government Justification:** - The government argued the changes were necessary to make the welfare system "sustainable and affordable for decades to come" [3] - They pointed to inherited deficits of $123 billion and debt rising to $667 billion [3] - Treasurer Joe Hockey declared "the age of entitlement is over" [2] - The government argued that without change, the budget would remain in deficit for at least a decade [3] **Criticisms and Concerns:** - Treasury analysis indicated the budget would disproportionately hit low-income households compared to wealthier ones [2] - The Australian Council of Social Service (ACOSS) warned the cuts could "destroy the social safety net" [2] - The budget broke multiple pre-election promises including "no change to pensions" [1][2] - The "six-month wait" for Newstart was widely criticised as unfair to young unemployed people **Comparative Context:** While the 2014 welfare cuts were significant, they followed a pattern where both major Australian parties have implemented welfare cuts when in government.
** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu :: : ** * ** *
The Gillard government's single parent payment cuts were described by welfare advocates as "the worst cut in a generation" at the time [7].
-- - 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 是shì shì 为了wèi le wèi le 使shǐ shǐ 福利制度fú lì zhì dù fú lì zhì dù "" " 在zài zài 未来wèi lái wèi lái 几十年jǐ shí nián jǐ shí nián 内nèi nèi 可kě kě 持续chí xù chí xù 且qiě qiě 负担得起fù dān dé qǐ fù dān dé qǐ "" " 所suǒ suǒ 必需bì xū bì xū 的de de [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
The difference with the 2014 budget was the concentration of cuts in a single package and the contrast with explicit pre-election commitments.
-- - 他们tā men tā men 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū 继承jì chéng jì chéng 了le le 12301230 1230 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 的de de 赤字chì zì chì zì 和hé hé 上升shàng shēng shàng shēng 到dào dào 66706670 6670 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 的de de 债务zhài wù zhài wù [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
The economists' statement suggests that while budget repair was a legitimate policy goal, the "emergency" framing used to justify the cuts was overstated given Australia's relatively strong economic position compared to other developed nations [5][6].
-- - 财政部长cái zhèng bù zhǎng cái zhèng bù zhǎng JoeJoe Joe HockeyHockey Hockey 宣布xuān bù xuān bù "" " 福利fú lì fú lì 时代shí dài shí dài 已经yǐ jīng yǐ jīng 结束jié shù jié shù "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
-- - 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 如果rú guǒ rú guǒ 不bù bù 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé ,, , 预算yù suàn yù suàn 将jiāng jiāng 至少zhì shǎo zhì shǎo 十年shí nián shí nián 保持bǎo chí bǎo chí 赤字chì zì chì zì [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
** * ** * 批评pī píng pī píng 和hé hé 担忧dān yōu dān yōu :: : ** * ** *
-- - 财政部cái zhèng bù cái zhèng bù 分析表明fēn xī biǎo míng fēn xī biǎo míng ,, , 预算yù suàn yù suàn 对duì duì 低收入dī shōu rù dī shōu rù 家庭jiā tíng jiā tíng 的de de 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 将jiāng jiāng 大于dà yú dà yú 富裕fù yù fù yù 家庭jiā tíng jiā tíng [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
-- - 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 社会shè huì shè huì 服务fú wù fú wù 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì (( ( ACOSSACOSS ACOSS )) ) 警告jǐng gào jǐng gào 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 可能kě néng kě néng "" " 摧毁cuī huǐ cuī huǐ 社会shè huì shè huì 安全网ān quán wǎng ān quán wǎng "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
-- - 该gāi gāi 预算yù suàn yù suàn 违背wéi bèi wéi bèi 了le le 多项duō xiàng duō xiàng 选前xuǎn qián xuǎn qián 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò ,, , 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò "" " 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn 不变bù biàn bù biàn "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
-- - 新起点xīn qǐ diǎn xīn qǐ diǎn 津贴jīn tiē jīn tiē 的de de "" " 六个月liù gè yuè liù gè yuè 等待děng dài děng dài 期qī qī "" " 被bèi bèi 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 批评pī píng pī píng 为wèi wèi 对duì duì 年轻nián qīng nián qīng 失业者shī yè zhě shī yè zhě 不bù bù 公平gōng píng gōng píng
** * ** * 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng :: : ** * ** *
虽然suī rán suī rán 20142014 2014 年nián nián 的de de 福利fú lì fú lì 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 意义yì yì yì yì 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà ,, , 但dàn dàn 它们tā men tā men 遵循zūn xún zūn xún 了le le 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 在zài zài 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 时shí shí 都dōu dōu 实施shí shī shí shī 福利fú lì fú lì 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 的de de 模式mó shì mó shì 。。 。
GillardGillard Gillard 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 单亲dān qīn dān qīn 家长jiā zhǎng jiā zhǎng 津贴jīn tiē jīn tiē 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 在zài zài 当时dāng shí dāng shí 被bèi bèi 福利fú lì fú lì 倡导者chàng dǎo zhě chàng dǎo zhě 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为wèi wèi "" " 一代人yí dài rén yí dài rén 以来yǐ lái yǐ lái 最zuì zuì 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 的de de 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn "" " [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。 。
20142014 2014 年nián nián 预算yù suàn yù suàn 的de de 不同之处bù tóng zhī chù bù tóng zhī chù 在于zài yú zài yú 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 集中jí zhōng jí zhōng 在zài zài 单一dān yī dān yī 方案fāng àn fāng àn 中zhōng zhōng ,, , 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 与yǔ yǔ 明确míng què míng què 的de de 选前xuǎn qián xuǎn qián 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 形成xíng chéng xíng chéng 对比duì bǐ duì bǐ 。。 。
经济学家jīng jì xué jiā jīng jì xué jiā 声明shēng míng shēng míng 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng ,, , 虽然suī rán suī rán 预算yù suàn yù suàn 修复xiū fù xiū fù 是shì shì 合法hé fǎ hé fǎ 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 目标mù biāo mù biāo ,, , 但dàn dàn 用于yòng yú yòng yú 证明zhèng míng zhèng míng 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 合理性hé lǐ xìng hé lǐ xìng 的de de "" " 紧急jǐn jí jǐn jí "" " 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 在zài zài 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 相对xiāng duì xiāng duì 于yú yú 其他qí tā qí tā 发达国家fā dá guó jiā fā dá guó jiā 的de de 强劲qiáng jìng qiáng jìng 经济jīng jì jīng jì 地位dì wèi dì wèi 而言ér yán ér yán 被bèi bèi 夸大kuā dà kuā dà 了le le [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。

部分属实

6.0

/ 10

CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ "" " 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 学生xué shēng xué shēng 、、 、 老年人lǎo nián rén lǎo nián rén 和hé hé 家庭jiā tíng jiā tíng 3030 30 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 福利fú lì fú lì "" " 的de de 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 部分bù fèn bù fèn 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què ,, , 但dàn dàn 缺乏quē fá quē fá 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 。。 。
The claim that the Coalition government "cut $3 billion in welfare for students, the elderly and families" is partially accurate but lacks important context.
20142014 2014 年nián nián 预算yù suàn yù suàn 确实què shí què shí 包含bāo hán bāo hán 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 群体qún tǐ qún tǐ 的de de 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 福利fú lì fú lì 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn ,, , 但dàn dàn 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 的de de "" " 3030 30 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán "" " 数字shù zì shù zì 难以nán yǐ nán yǐ 从cóng cóng 官方guān fāng guān fāng 预算yù suàn yù suàn 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 中zhōng zhōng 精确jīng què jīng què 核实hé shí hé shí 。。 。
The 2014 budget did contain significant welfare cuts affecting these groups, though the specific "$3 billion" figure is difficult to verify precisely from official budget documents.
预算yù suàn yù suàn 修复xiū fù xiū fù 方案fāng àn fāng àn 总额zǒng é zǒng é 为wèi wèi 五年wǔ nián wǔ nián 360360 360 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán ,, , 其中qí zhōng qí zhōng 福利fú lì fú lì 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 占zhàn zhàn 相当xiāng dāng xiāng dāng 大dà dà 的de de 部分bù fèn bù fèn 。。 。
The total budget repair package was $36 billion over five years, with welfare changes forming a substantial component.
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le :: :
However, the claim omits that: 1.
11 1 .. . 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 对于duì yú duì yú 解决jiě jué jiě jué 继承jì chéng jì chéng 的de de 赤字chì zì chì zì 和hé hé 不可bù kě bù kě 持续chí xù chí xù 的de de 支出zhī chū zhī chū 轨迹guǐ jì guǐ jì 是shì shì 必要bì yào bì yào 的de de
The government argued these cuts were necessary to address inherited deficits and unsustainable spending trajectories 2.
22 2 .. . 高收入者gāo shōu rù zhě gāo shōu rù zhě 也yě yě 通过tōng guò tōng guò 临时lín shí lín shí 预算yù suàn yù suàn 修复xiū fù xiū fù 税shuì shuì 成为chéng wéi chéng wéi 目标mù biāo mù biāo
Higher-income earners were also targeted through the Temporary Budget Repair Levy 3.
33 3 .. . 前任qián rèn qián rèn LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 也yě yě 实施shí shī shí shī 了le le 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 福利fú lì fú lì 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn
Previous Labor governments had also implemented significant welfare cuts 4.
44 4 .. . 用于yòng yú yòng yú 证明zhèng míng zhèng míng 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 合理性hé lǐ xìng hé lǐ xìng 的de de "" " 预算yù suàn yù suàn 紧急状态jǐn jí zhuàng tài jǐn jí zhuàng tài "" " 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 受到shòu dào shòu dào 6363 63 位wèi wèi 顶尖dǐng jiān dǐng jiān 经济学家jīng jì xué jiā jīng jì xué jiā 的de de 质疑zhì yí zhì yí
The "budget emergency" framing used to justify the cuts was disputed by 63 leading economists The welfare cuts were real and significant, but they should be understood in the broader context of both the government's fiscal justification and the historical pattern of welfare changes by governments of both major parties.
福利fú lì fú lì 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 是shì shì 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 且qiě qiě 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 的de de ,, , 但应dàn yīng dàn yīng 在zài zài 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 财政cái zhèng cái zhèng 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 和hé hé 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 福利fú lì fú lì 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ 模式mó shì mó shì 的de de 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 下xià xià 加以jiā yǐ jiā yǐ 理解lǐ jiě lǐ jiě 。。 。

📚 来源与引用 (9)

  1. 1
    Budget 2014: Tony Abbott and Joe Hockey walking fine line on broken promises

    Budget 2014: Tony Abbott and Joe Hockey walking fine line on broken promises

    Tony Abbott will be looking for a verdict on what he did in his first term rather than what he promised in the campaign before it, writes Lyndal Curtis.

    Abc Net
  2. 2
    2014 Australian federal budget

    2014 Australian federal budget

    Wikipedia
  3. 3
    Treasurer Joe Hockey's 2014-15 Federal Budget Speech

    Treasurer Joe Hockey's 2014-15 Federal Budget Speech

    Full text and audio of Treasurer Joe Hockey's 2014-15 Budget Speech to the House of Representatives. Includes downloads of key Budget documents.

    AustralianPolitics.com
  4. 4
    Pensioners, health, family payments face cuts under Abbott government's Commission of Audit report

    Pensioners, health, family payments face cuts under Abbott government's Commission of Audit report

    States would have the power to levy income tax, all patients would  pay $15 co-payments to visit a doctor, everyone would pay more for medicines, and family payments would be slashed under a sweeping set of measures recommended by the Abbott government’s Commission of Audit.

    The Sydney Morning Herald
  5. 5
    PDF

    Australiainstitute.org.au - Economists' Statement on Commonwealth Budgetary and Economic Priorities

    Australiainstitute Org • PDF Document
  6. 6
    No budget emergency, say economists

    No budget emergency, say economists

    Leading economists have rejected the Abbott government’s claims of a ’’budget emergency”, saying the budget only faces a medium-term “problem” rather than a crisis, which should be dealt with sooner rather than later.

    The Age
  7. 7
    wsws.org

    Revealed: Australian Labor government's record spending cuts

    Labor made deep inroads into social expenditure, clearing the way for the incoming Liberal-National Coalition to intensify the offensive.

    World Socialist Web Site
  8. 8
    Labor's legacy: six years of … what exactly?

    Labor's legacy: six years of … what exactly?

    Political historians are likely to treat the Rudd and Gillard governments far more kindly than many contemporary commentators have - and certainly more kindly than the Murdoch press has. The passing of…

    The Conversation
  9. 9
    PDF

    Australian Government spending trends

    Pbo Gov • PDF Document

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。