属实

评分: 7.0/10

Coalition
C0956

声明内容

“削减了环境捍卫者办公室(Environmental Defender's Offices)的所有资金(超过1000万澳元)。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis
分析时间: 3 Feb 2026

原始来源

事实核查

** * ** * 属实shǔ shí shǔ shí ** * ** * -- - 艾伯特ài bó tè ài bó tè 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí zài zài 20132013 2013 nián nián 1212 12 yuè yuè 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo le le xiàng xiàng 环境huán jìng huán jìng 捍卫者hàn wèi zhě hàn wèi zhě 办公室bàn gōng shì bàn gōng shì EDOsEDOs EDOs 提供tí gōng tí gōng de de 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 资金zī jīn zī jīn
**TRUE** - The Abbott government did eliminate federal funding to Environmental Defender's Offices (EDOs) in December 2013.
资金zī jīn zī jīn 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn shì shì zài zài 20132013 2013 nián nián 1212 12 yuè yuè 1717 17 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ de de nián nián zhōng zhōng 经济jīng jì jīng jì 财政cái zhèng cái zhèng 展望zhǎn wàng zhǎn wàng MYEFOMYEFO MYEFO zhōng zhōng 宣布xuān bù xuān bù de de [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The funding cuts were announced in the government's Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook (MYEFO) on December 17, 2013 [1].
削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 总额zǒng é zǒng é yuē yuē wèi wèi qián qián 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò de de 四年sì nián sì nián 10001000 1000 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 结束jié shù jié shù le le EDOsEDOs EDOs jìn jìn 二十年èr shí nián èr shí nián lái lái 每年měi nián měi nián yuē yuē 99 9 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán de de 长期cháng qī cháng qī 年度nián dù nián dù 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
The cuts totaled approximately $10 million over four years that had been committed by the previous Labor government, plus an end to long-standing annual payments of approximately $90,000 that EDOs had received for nearly two decades [2].
EDOsEDOs EDOs 确认què rèn què rèn 20132013 2013 nián nián 1212 12 yuè yuè 1717 17 收到shōu dào shōu dào zǒng zǒng 检察长jiǎn chá zhǎng jiǎn chá zhǎng de de 通知tōng zhī tōng zhī 资金zī jīn zī jīn jiāng jiāng 立即lì jí lì jí 终止zhōng zhǐ zhōng zhǐ 20142014 2014 nián nián 77 7 yuè yuè 11 1 之后zhī hòu zhī hòu 不再bù zài bù zài yǒu yǒu 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 资金zī jīn zī jīn [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
The EDOs confirmed they received notification from the Attorney-General's department on December 17, 2013, that funding would be terminated immediately, with no federal funding available after July 1, 2014 [3].
维多利亚州wéi duō lì yà zhōu wéi duō lì yà zhōu EDOsEDOs EDOs 首席shǒu xí shǒu xí 执行官zhí xíng guān zhí xíng guān 布伦丹bù lún dān bù lún dān ·· · 赛德斯sài dé sī sài dé sī BrendanBrendan Brendan SydesSydes Sydes 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì de de 办公室bàn gōng shì bàn gōng shì 面临miàn lín miàn lín 4545 45 -- - 50%50% 50% de de 资金zī jīn zī jīn 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn [[ [ 44 4 ]] ]
Brendan Sydes, chief executive of the Victorian EDO, stated his office faced a 45-50% funding reduction [4].
duì duì EDOsEDOs EDOs de de 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn shì shì 四年sì nián sì nián nèi nèi "" " 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 资金zī jīn zī jīn "" " 总额zǒng é zǒng é 43104310 4310 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn de de 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn 其中qí zhōng qí zhōng hái hái 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò duì duì 法律援助fǎ lǜ yuán zhù fǎ lǜ yuán zhù 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì de de 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 650650 650 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 全国quán guó quán guó 原住民yuán zhù mín yuán zhù mín 托雷斯tuō léi sī tuō léi sī 海峡hǎi xiá hǎi xiá 岛民dǎo mín dǎo mín 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 服务fú wù fú wù 13301330 1330 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 家庭暴力jiā tíng bào lì jiā tíng bào lì 预防yù fáng yù fáng 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 服务fú wù fú wù 366366 366 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 社区shè qū shè qū 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 服务项目fú wù xiàng mù fú wù xiàng mù 19601960 1960 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
The cut to EDOs was part of a broader $43.1 million reduction over four years to "Legal Policy Reform and Advocacy Funding" which also included cuts to Legal Aid Commissions ($6.5 million), National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Legal Services ($13.3 million), Family Violence Prevention Legal Services ($3.66 million), and the Community Legal Service Program ($19.6 million) [5].

缺失背景

** * ** * gāi gāi 资金zī jīn zī jīn shì shì 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng zài zài 选举xuǎn jǔ xuǎn jǔ 前新qián xīn qián xīn 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò de de ** * ** * zhè zhè 10001000 1000 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 资金zī jīn zī jīn shì shì zài zài 20132013 2013 nián nián 选举xuǎn jǔ xuǎn jǔ 期间qī jiān qī jiān 由前yóu qián yóu qián 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ zài zài "" " 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 末期mò qī mò qī "" " 宣布xuān bù xuān bù de de [[ [ 66 6 ]] ]
**The funding was newly committed by Labor just before the election:** The $10 million in funding was announced by the former Labor government in its "dying days" - during the 2013 election period [6].
艾伯特ài bó tè ài bó tè 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 辩称biàn chēng biàn chēng shì shì zài zài 撤销chè xiāo chè xiāo 一个yí gè yí gè 即将jí jiāng jí jiāng 离任lí rèn lí rèn 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ de de 最后zuì hòu zuì hòu 一刻yī kè yī kè 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò ér ér fēi fēi 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì de de 长期cháng qī cháng qī 资金zī jīn zī jīn
The Abbott government argued it was reversing a last-minute commitment made by an outgoing government rather than cutting established long-term funding. **Previous funding history:** EDOs had received approximately $90,000-100,000 annually from the federal government for about 20 years prior to 2013 [7].
** * ** * 先前xiān qián xiān qián 资金zī jīn zī jīn 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ ** * ** * zài zài 20132013 2013 nián nián 之前zhī qián zhī qián yuē yuē 2020 20 年间nián jiān nián jiān EDOsEDOs EDOs 每年měi nián měi nián cóng cóng 联邦政府lián bāng zhèng fǔ lián bāng zhèng fǔ 获得huò dé huò dé yuē yuē 99 9 万至wàn zhì wàn zhì 1010 10 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán de de 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn [[ [ 77 7 ]] ]
The $10 million represented a significant boost committed by Labor that was never actually disbursed before the government changed. **Stated rationale for the cuts:** Attorney-General George Brandis defended the decision by stating that "in a resource-constrained environment, legal assistance funding should be spent where it is most needed - helping actual people in actual distressful situations" rather than on "legal advocacy work" [8].
zhè zhè 10001000 1000 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán shì shì 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò de de 大幅dà fú dà fú 增加zēng jiā zēng jiā dàn dàn zài zài 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 更迭gēng dié gēng dié qián qián 从未cóng wèi cóng wèi 实际shí jì shí jì 拨付bō fù bō fù
The government maintained that the cuts would not affect "frontline services" [9]. **Industry lobbying:** In October 2013, the NSW Minerals Council publicly called for Attorney-General George Brandis to stop funding the NSW EDO, expressing concern about the way it had helped stall mining project approvals [10].
** * ** * 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn de de statedstated stated rationalerationale rationale ** * ** * zǒng zǒng 检察长jiǎn chá zhǎng jiǎn chá zhǎng 乔治qiáo zhì qiáo zhì ·· · 布兰迪斯bù lán dí sī bù lán dí sī GeorgeGeorge George BrandisBrandis Brandis wèi wèi zhè zhè 决定jué dìng jué dìng 辩护biàn hù biàn hù chēng chēng "" " zài zài 资源zī yuán zī yuán 受限shòu xiàn shòu xiàn de de 环境huán jìng huán jìng zhōng zhōng 法律援助fǎ lǜ yuán zhù fǎ lǜ yuán zhù 资金zī jīn zī jīn 应花yīng huā yīng huā zài zài zuì zuì 需要xū yào xū yào de de 地方dì fāng dì fāng 帮助bāng zhù bāng zhù 处于chǔ yú chǔ yú 实际shí jì shí jì 困境kùn jìng kùn jìng zhōng zhōng de de 实际shí jì shí jì 民众mín zhòng mín zhòng "" " ér ér fēi fēi 用于yòng yú yòng yú "" " 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò "" " [[ [ 88 8 ]] ]
This raised questions about whether industry influence played a role in the decision.
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 坚称jiān chēng jiān chēng 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 不会bú huì bú huì 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng "" " 一线yī xiàn yī xiàn 服务fú wù fú wù "" " [[ [ 99 9 ]] ]
** * ** * 行业háng yè háng yè 游说yóu shuì yóu shuì ** * ** * 20132013 2013 nián nián 1010 10 yuè yuè 新南威尔士州xīn nán wēi ěr shì zhōu xīn nán wēi ěr shì zhōu 矿业kuàng yè kuàng yè 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 呼吁hū yù hū yù zǒng zǒng 检察长jiǎn chá zhǎng jiǎn chá zhǎng 乔治qiáo zhì qiáo zhì ·· · 布兰迪斯bù lán dí sī bù lán dí sī 停止tíng zhǐ tíng zhǐ duì duì 新南威尔士州xīn nán wēi ěr shì zhōu xīn nán wēi ěr shì zhōu EDOsEDOs EDOs de de 资助zī zhù zī zhù duì duì 帮助bāng zhù bāng zhù 拖延tuō yán tuō yán 采矿cǎi kuàng cǎi kuàng 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 审批shěn pī shěn pī de de 方式fāng shì fāng shì 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 担忧dān yōu dān yōu [[ [ 1010 10 ]] ]
zhè zhè 引发yǐn fā yǐn fā le le 关于guān yú guān yú 行业háng yè háng yè 影响力yǐng xiǎng lì yǐng xiǎng lì 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu zài zài gāi gāi 决定jué dìng jué dìng zhōng zhōng 发挥作用fā huī zuò yòng fā huī zuò yòng de de 质疑zhì yí zhì yí

来源可信度评估

原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán 悉尼xī ní xī ní 先驱xiān qū xiān qū 晨报chén bào chén bào SMHSMH SMH shì shì 一家yī jiā yī jiā 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 报纸bào zhǐ bào zhǐ 拥有yōng yǒu yōng yǒu 悠久yōu jiǔ yōu jiǔ de de 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ
The original source, the Sydney Morning Herald (SMH), is a mainstream Australian newspaper with a long history of journalism.
根据gēn jù gēn jù MediaMedia Media BiasBias Bias // / FactFact Fact CheckCheck Check SMHSMH SMH zài zài 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 报道bào dào bào dào zhōng zhōng 保持bǎo chí bǎo chí "" " 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ de de 中间派zhōng jiān pài zhōng jiān pài 基调jī diào jī diào "" " 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ shàng shàng céng céng 支持zhī chí zhī chí 两大liǎng dà liǎng dà 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng de de 候选人hòu xuǎn rén hòu xuǎn rén [[ [ 1111 11 ]] ]
According to Media Bias/Fact Check, SMH maintains a "reasonable centrist tone" in its political coverage and has historically endorsed candidates from both major parties [11].
gāi gāi 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng yóu yóu 汤姆tāng mǔ tāng mǔ ·· · 阿鲁普ā lǔ pǔ ā lǔ pǔ TomTom Tom ArupArup Arup 撰写zhuàn xiě zhuàn xiě bèi bèi 确认què rèn què rèn wèi wèi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 发展fā zhǎn fā zhǎn 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn de de 气候qì hòu qì hòu 负责人fù zé rén fù zé rén 报道bào dào bào dào 有关yǒu guān yǒu guān 资金zī jīn zī jīn 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn de de 事实shì shí shì shí 信息xìn xī xìn xī
The article was written by Tom Arup, identified as Climate Lead at the Centre for Policy Development, reporting factual information about the funding cuts.
SMHSMH SMH 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng bèi bèi 视为shì wèi shì wèi 一家yī jiā yī jiā 可信kě xìn kě xìn de de 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú de de 新闻来源xīn wén lái yuán xīn wén lái yuán 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 明显míng xiǎn míng xiǎn de de 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 偏见piān jiàn piān jiàn [[ [ 1212 12 ]] ]
The SMH is generally considered a credible, mainstream news source without significant partisan bias [12].
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做过zuò guò zuò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng
**Did Labor do something similar?** No - Labor did not cut EDO funding.
** * ** *
In fact, the opposite occurred: - **Labor committed the funding:** The Rudd/Gillard Labor government announced the $10 million, four-year funding commitment for EDOs in the lead-up to the 2013 election [13]. - **Labor pledged to restore funding:** In 2019, federal Labor announced it would restore funding to EDOs with a $14 million package over four years if elected [14]. - **Albanese government reinstated funding:** When the Albanese Labor government won office in 2022, it reinstated federal funding to the Environmental Defenders Office [15]. **However, Labor has faced criticism on related issues:** - During the 2019 election campaign, the Morrison Coalition government highlighted that Labor had itself cut $6.5 million from Legal Aid Commissions in 2013 [16]. - The broader context shows that both parties have made cuts to legal assistance services at different times, though Labor has generally been more supportive of environmental legal services specifically.
没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn EDOsEDOs EDOs 资金zī jīn zī jīn
事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 恰恰相反qià qià xiāng fǎn qià qià xiāng fǎn
-- - ** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò le le 资金zī jīn zī jīn ** * ** * 陆克文lù kè wén lù kè wén // / 吉拉德jí lā dé jí lā dé 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ zài zài 20132013 2013 nián nián 选举xuǎn jǔ xuǎn jǔ qián qián 宣布xuān bù xuān bù le le 为期wéi qī wéi qī 四年sì nián sì nián 10001000 1000 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán de de EDOsEDOs EDOs 资金zī jīn zī jīn 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò [[ [ 1313 13 ]] ]
-- - ** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 恢复huī fù huī fù 资金zī jīn zī jīn ** * ** * 20192019 2019 nián nián 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 如果rú guǒ rú guǒ 当选dāng xuǎn dāng xuǎn jiāng jiāng zài zài 四年sì nián sì nián 内以nèi yǐ nèi yǐ 14001400 1400 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán de de 方案fāng àn fāng àn 恢复huī fù huī fù duì duì EDOsEDOs EDOs de de 资助zī zhù zī zhù [[ [ 1414 14 ]] ]
-- - ** * ** * 阿尔巴尼ā ěr bā ní ā ěr bā ní 斯政府sī zhèng fǔ sī zhèng fǔ 恢复huī fù huī fù le le 资金zī jīn zī jīn ** * ** * dāng dāng 阿尔巴尼ā ěr bā ní ā ěr bā ní 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 20222022 2022 nián nián 赢得yíng dé yíng dé 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng shí shí 恢复huī fù huī fù le le duì duì 环境huán jìng huán jìng 捍卫者hàn wèi zhě hàn wèi zhě 办公室bàn gōng shì bàn gōng shì de de 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 资助zī zhù zī zhù [[ [ 1515 15 ]] ]
** * ** * 然而rán ér rán ér 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng zài zài 相关xiāng guān xiāng guān 问题wèn tí wèn tí shàng shàng 受到shòu dào shòu dào 批评pī píng pī píng ** * ** *
-- - zài zài 20192019 2019 nián nián 选举xuǎn jǔ xuǎn jǔ 活动huó dòng huó dòng 期间qī jiān qī jiān 莫里森mò lǐ sēn mò lǐ sēn 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 强调qiáng diào qiáng diào 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 本身běn shēn běn shēn zài zài 20132013 2013 nián nián cóng cóng 法律援助fǎ lǜ yuán zhù fǎ lǜ yuán zhù 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn le le 650650 650 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán [[ [ 1616 16 ]] ]
-- - gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng zài zài 不同bù tóng bù tóng 时期shí qī shí qī dōu dōu duì duì 法律援助fǎ lǜ yuán zhù fǎ lǜ yuán zhù 服务fú wù fú wù 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng guò guò 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng gèng gèng 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 支持zhī chí zhī chí 环境huán jìng huán jìng 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 服务fú wù fú wù
🌐

平衡视角

虽然suī rán suī rán 事实shì shí shì shí 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què de de 艾伯特ài bó tè ài bó tè 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo le le 联邦lián bāng lián bāng EDOsEDOs EDOs 资金zī jīn zī jīn dàn dàn 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 改变gǎi biàn gǎi biàn le le 对此duì cǐ duì cǐ de de 解读jiě dú jiě dú 方式fāng shì fāng shì
While the factual claim is accurate - the Abbott government did eliminate federal EDO funding - important context changes how this should be interpreted: **Critics' perspective:** Environmental groups and legal experts argued the cuts were politically motivated, coming after lobbying from the mining industry and designed to weaken environmental legal challenges against mining projects.
** * ** * 批评者pī píng zhě pī píng zhě de de 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn ** * ** * 环保huán bǎo huán bǎo 团体tuán tǐ tuán tǐ 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 辩称biàn chēng biàn chēng 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn shì shì 出于chū yú chū yú 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 动机dòng jī dòng jī shì shì zài zài 矿业kuàng yè kuàng yè 行业háng yè háng yè 游说yóu shuì yóu shuì 之后zhī hòu zhī hòu 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng de de 旨在zhǐ zài zhǐ zài 削弱xuē ruò xuē ruò 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 采矿cǎi kuàng cǎi kuàng 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù de de 环境huán jìng huán jìng 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn
EDOs had been involved in high-profile cases blocking coal mine expansations and representing communities against major developments [17].
EDOsEDOs EDOs céng céng 参与cān yù cān yù 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ 煤矿méi kuàng méi kuàng 扩张kuò zhāng kuò zhāng 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 社区shè qū shè qū 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 开发kāi fā kāi fā de de 高调gāo diào gāo diào 案件àn jiàn àn jiàn [[ [ 1717 17 ]] ]
The timing (one week before Christmas) was criticized as deliberately designed to minimize public attention [18]. **Government's justification:** The Abbott government framed the cuts as a responsible budget measure, arguing that: 1.
时机shí jī shí jī 圣诞节shèng dàn jié shèng dàn jié qián qián 一周yī zhōu yī zhōu bèi bèi 批评pī píng pī píng wèi wèi 故意gù yì gù yì 设计shè jì shè jì 尽量减少jǐn liàng jiǎn shǎo jǐn liàng jiǎn shǎo 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng 关注guān zhù guān zhù [[ [ 1818 18 ]] ]
The $10 million was a new commitment by an outgoing government that hadn't yet been spent 2.
** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ de de 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu ** * ** * 艾伯特ài bó tè ài bó tè 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ jiāng jiāng 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 框定kuāng dìng kuāng dìng wèi wèi 负责fù zé fù zé rèn rèn de de 预算yù suàn yù suàn 措施cuò shī cuò shī 辩称biàn chēng biàn chēng
In a constrained fiscal environment, legal funding should prioritize direct client services over advocacy 3.
11 1 .. . zhè zhè 10001000 1000 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán shì shì 一个yí gè yí gè 即将jí jiāng jí jiāng 离任lí rèn lí rèn 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ de de xīn xīn 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 尚未shàng wèi shàng wèi 拨付bō fù bō fù
EDOs could seek alternative funding through donations and state governments **Comparative context:** This was a partisan issue where the parties had genuinely different policy positions.
22 2 .. . zài zài 财政cái zhèng cái zhèng 受限shòu xiàn shòu xiàn de de 环境huán jìng huán jìng xià xià 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 资金zī jīn zī jīn yīng yīng 优先yōu xiān yōu xiān 用于yòng yú yòng yú 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 客户服务kè hù fú wù kè hù fú wù ér ér fēi fēi 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo
Labor supported funding environmental legal services; the Coalition opposed it.
33 3 .. . EDOsEDOs EDOs 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ 通过tōng guò tōng guò 捐款juān kuǎn juān kuǎn 州政府zhōu zhèng fǔ zhōu zhèng fǔ 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 替代tì dài tì dài 资金zī jīn zī jīn
The Albanese government's 2022 restoration of funding demonstrates this was a genuine policy difference rather than a temporary budget measure.
** * ** * 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ** * ** * 这是zhè shì zhè shì 一个yí gè yí gè 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 议题yì tí yì tí 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng yǒu yǒu 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng de de 不同bù tóng bù tóng 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng
The 2024-25 budget showed the Environmental Defenders Office receiving $3.35 million in federal funding [19]. **Industry influence concerns:** The NSW Minerals Council's October 2013 public call for EDO defunding, followed by the Attorney-General's December decision, raised legitimate concerns about mining industry influence on the policy decision [20].
工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 支持zhī chí zhī chí 资助zī zhù zī zhù 环境huán jìng huán jìng 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 服务fú wù fú wù 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì
阿尔巴尼ā ěr bā ní ā ěr bā ní 斯政府sī zhèng fǔ sī zhèng fǔ 20222022 2022 nián nián 恢复huī fù huī fù 资金zī jīn zī jīn 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 这是zhè shì zhè shì 一个yí gè yí gè 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 分歧fēn qí fēn qí ér ér fēi fēi 临时lín shí lín shí 预算yù suàn yù suàn 措施cuò shī cuò shī
20242024 2024 -- - 2525 25 预算yù suàn yù suàn 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì 环境huán jìng huán jìng 捍卫者hàn wèi zhě hàn wèi zhě 办公室bàn gōng shì bàn gōng shì 获得huò dé huò dé 335335 335 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 资金zī jīn zī jīn [[ [ 1919 19 ]] ]
** * ** * 行业háng yè háng yè 影响力yǐng xiǎng lì yǐng xiǎng lì 担忧dān yōu dān yōu ** * ** * 新南威尔士州xīn nán wēi ěr shì zhōu xīn nán wēi ěr shì zhōu 矿业kuàng yè kuàng yè 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 20132013 2013 nián nián 1010 10 yuè yuè 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 呼吁hū yù hū yù 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo EDOsEDOs EDOs 资助zī zhù zī zhù 随后suí hòu suí hòu zǒng zǒng 检察长jiǎn chá zhǎng jiǎn chá zhǎng 1212 12 yuè yuè 做出zuò chū zuò chū 决定jué dìng jué dìng zhè zhè 引发yǐn fā yǐn fā le le 关于guān yú guān yú 矿业kuàng yè kuàng yè 行业háng yè háng yè duì duì gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 决定jué dìng jué dìng 影响力yǐng xiǎng lì yǐng xiǎng lì de de 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 担忧dān yōu dān yōu [[ [ 2020 20 ]] ]

属实

7.0

/ 10

核心hé xīn hé xīn 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng zài zài 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què de de 艾伯特ài bó tè ài bó tè 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo le le xiàng xiàng 环境huán jìng huán jìng 捍卫者hàn wèi zhě hàn wèi zhě 办公室bàn gōng shì bàn gōng shì 提供tí gōng tí gōng de de 超过chāo guò chāo guò 10001000 1000 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán de de 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 资金zī jīn zī jīn
The core claim is factually accurate: the Abbott government did eliminate over $10 million in federal funding to Environmental Defender's Offices.
然而rán ér rán ér gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 忽略hū lüè hū lüè le le 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng
However, the claim omits crucial context: 1.
11 1 .. . zhè zhè 10001000 1000 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán shì shì zài zài 20132013 2013 nián nián 选举xuǎn jǔ xuǎn jǔ qián qián yóu yóu 即将jí jiāng jí jiāng 离任lí rèn lí rèn de de 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ xīn xīn 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò de de ér ér fēi fēi 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì de de 长期cháng qī cháng qī 资金zī jīn zī jīn
The $10 million was a new commitment made by the outgoing Labor government just before the 2013 election, not established long-term funding 2.
22 2 .. . 长期cháng qī cháng qī 年度nián dù nián dù 资金zī jīn zī jīn yuē yuē 每年měi nián měi nián 99 9 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 持续chí xù chí xù yuē yuē 2020 20 nián nián bèi bèi 终止zhōng zhǐ zhōng zhǐ 这比zhè bǐ zhè bǐ 仅仅jǐn jǐn jǐn jǐn 撤销chè xiāo chè xiāo xīn xīn 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 更为gèng wéi gèng wéi 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà
The long-standing annual funding (~$90,000/year for ~20 years) was also ended, which was more significant than just reversing a new commitment 3.
33 3 .. . 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 提供tí gōng tí gōng le le 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 专注zhuān zhù zhuān zhù 一线yī xiàn yī xiàn 服务fú wù fú wù ér ér fēi fēi 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 虽然suī rán suī rán 商榷shāng què shāng què 但是dàn shì dàn shì 一个yí gè yí gè 合法hé fǎ hé fǎ de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng
The government provided a rationale (focusing on frontline services over advocacy) that, while debatable, was a legitimate policy position 4.
44 4 .. . 矿业kuàng yè kuàng yè 行业háng yè háng yè 游说yóu shuì yóu shuì 紧接在jǐn jiē zài jǐn jiē zài gāi gāi 决定jué dìng jué dìng 之前zhī qián zhī qián 暗示àn shì àn shì le le 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 动机dòng jī dòng jī
Mining industry lobbying immediately preceded the decision, suggesting political motivation The claim presents the funding cut as a standalone negative action without acknowledging that this reflected a genuine policy difference between the parties on environmental legal aid - a difference that has persisted with Labor restoring funding in 2022.
gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng jiāng jiāng 资金zī jīn zī jīn 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 呈现chéng xiàn chéng xiàn wèi wèi 独立dú lì dú lì de de 负面fù miàn fù miàn 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi ér ér wèi wèi 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn zhè zhè 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng le le 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng zài zài 环境huán jìng huán jìng 法律援助fǎ lǜ yuán zhù fǎ lǜ yuán zhù shàng shàng de de 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 分歧fēn qí fēn qí 这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 分歧fēn qí fēn qí 随着suí zhe suí zhe 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 20222022 2022 nián nián 恢复huī fù huī fù 资金zī jīn zī jīn ér ér 持续chí xù chí xù 存在cún zài cún zài

📚 来源与引用 (10)

  1. 1
    Funding cut to Environmental Defender's Offices described as 'barbaric'

    Funding cut to Environmental Defender's Offices described as 'barbaric'

    Legal centres providing representation for environment-related cases have had their funding cut by the Federal Government.

    Abc Net
  2. 2
    Abbott government strips environmental legal centres of federal funding

    Abbott government strips environmental legal centres of federal funding

    Australia’s environmental legal centres have lost their federal funding in a move that could see the closure of some of the nine offices around the country.

    The Sydney Morning Herald
  3. 3
    PDF

    Australia's environment - Chapter 3

    Aph Gov • PDF Document
  4. 4
    Brandis shaky on reason for cuts to environmental advocacy

    Brandis shaky on reason for cuts to environmental advocacy

    Federal Attorney-General George Brandis has defended his decision to slash funding to environmental legal advocacy groups, saying his position has always been that in a resource-constrained scenario, money should go to the front line and those most in need.

    Australian Financial Review
  5. 5
    The Sydney Morning Herald - Bias and Credibility

    The Sydney Morning Herald - Bias and Credibility

    LEFT-CENTER BIAS These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording

    Media Bias/Fact Check
  6. 6
    How biased is The Sydney Morning Herald?

    How biased is The Sydney Morning Herald?

    The Sydney Morning Herald (SMH) is a prominent newspaper in Australia, known for its coverage of local, national, and international news. However, the

    My Sydney Detour
  7. 7
    Labor pledges $14m funding boost to Environmental Defenders Offices

    Labor pledges $14m funding boost to Environmental Defenders Offices

    UNSW Sites
  8. 8
    Environmental Defenders Office's funding under review after judge ruled body distorted indigenous views

    Environmental Defenders Office's funding under review after judge ruled body distorted indigenous views

    SkyNews.com.au — Australian News Headlines & World News Online from the best award winning journalists

    Sky News
  9. 9
    Another barnacle removed: Abbott government's planned cuts to legal aid services now reversed

    Another barnacle removed: Abbott government's planned cuts to legal aid services now reversed

    Sweeping cuts to domestic violence and Indigenous legal services will no longer go ahead after another budget backdown from the federal government.

    The Sydney Morning Herald
  10. 10
    Federal funding - Environmental Defenders Office

    Federal funding - Environmental Defenders Office

    The Environmental Defenders Office has a proud history of providing access to environmental justice. The first EDO was founded in 1985, and as an accredited Community Legal Centre our public interest environmental lawyers have served people and communities across Australia for nearly 40 years.  Our clients are grandparents concerned for younger generations, environmental charities acting [...]Read More... from Federal funding

    Environmental Defenders Office

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。