部分属实

评分: 6.0/10

Coalition
C0917

声明内容

“挫败了停止在(世俗)联邦议会每次开会日开始时诵读(基督教)主祷文的动议。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

** * ** * 核心hé xīn hé xīn 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 在zài zài 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng 是shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de 。。 。
**The core claim is factually accurate.** The Coalition Government (2013-2022) did vote against and defeat multiple Greens motions seeking to abolish or replace the recitation of the Lord's Prayer at the beginning of each parliamentary sitting day.
** * ** * 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ (( ( 20132013 2013 -- - 20222022 2022 )) ) 确实què shí què shí 投票tóu piào tóu piào 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 并bìng bìng 挫败cuò bài cuò bài 了le le 绿党lǜ dǎng lǜ dǎng 多次duō cì duō cì 提出tí chū tí chū 的de de 废除fèi chú fèi chú 或huò huò 取代qǔ dài qǔ dài 议会yì huì yì huì 每次měi cì měi cì 开会kāi huì kāi huì 日rì rì 开始kāi shǐ kāi shǐ 时shí shí 诵读sòng dú sòng dú 主祷文zhǔ dǎo wén zhǔ dǎo wén 的de de 动议dòng yì dòng yì 。。 。
In February 2014, Greens leader Richard Di Natale moved a motion to replace the parliamentary prayer with a moment for "silent prayer or reflection" [1].
20142014 2014 年nián nián 22 2 月yuè yuè ,, , 绿党lǜ dǎng lǜ dǎng 领袖lǐng xiù lǐng xiù RichardRichard Richard DiDi Di NataleNatale Natale 提出tí chū tí chū 动议dòng yì dòng yì ,, , 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 将jiāng jiāng 议会yì huì yì huì 祈祷qí dǎo qí dǎo 改为gǎi wéi gǎi wéi "" " 静默jìng mò jìng mò 祈祷qí dǎo qí dǎo 或huò huò 反思fǎn sī fǎn sī "" " 时刻shí kè shí kè [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The motion was defeated in the Senate, with Coalition senators voting against it alongside Labor senators [2].
该gāi gāi 动议dòng yì dòng yì 在zài zài 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 被bèi bèi 否决fǒu jué fǒu jué ,, , 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán 与yǔ yǔ 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán 一起yì qǐ yì qǐ 投了tóu le tóu le 反对票fǎn duì piào fǎn duì piào [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The tradition of reading prayers at the start of each sitting day dates back to the opening of Federal Parliament on 9 May 1901 [3].
在zài zài 每次měi cì měi cì 开会kāi huì kāi huì 日rì rì 开始kāi shǐ kāi shǐ 时shí shí 诵读sòng dú sòng dú 祈祷qí dǎo qí dǎo 的de de 传统chuán tǒng chuán tǒng 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ 追溯到zhuī sù dào zhuī sù dào 19011901 1901 年nián nián 55 5 月yuè yuè 99 9 日rì rì 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 议会yì huì yì huì 开幕kāi mù kāi mù [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
The Standing Orders of both the House of Representatives and Senate require the Speaker and President respectively to read a parliamentary prayer followed by the Lord's Prayer at the beginning of each sitting day [4].
众议院zhòng yì yuàn zhòng yì yuàn 和hé hé 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 的de de 议事规则yì shì guī zé yì shì guī zé 分别fēn bié fēn bié 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 议长yì zhǎng yì zhǎng 和hé hé 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 议长yì zhǎng yì zhǎng 在zài zài 每次měi cì měi cì 开会kāi huì kāi huì 日rì rì 开始kāi shǐ kāi shǐ 时shí shí 诵读sòng dú sòng dú 议会yì huì yì huì 祈祷qí dǎo qí dǎo ,, , 随后suí hòu suí hòu 诵读sòng dú sòng dú 主祷文zhǔ dǎo wén zhǔ dǎo wén [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
In 2017, Greens Senator Lee Rhiannon again called for the Lord's Prayer to be removed, describing it as "insulting" and "jarring" [5].
20172017 2017 年nián nián ,, , 绿党lǜ dǎng lǜ dǎng 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán LeeLee Lee RhiannonRhiannon Rhiannon 再次zài cì zài cì 呼吁hū yù hū yù 删除shān chú shān chú 主祷文zhǔ dǎo wén zhǔ dǎo wén ,, , 称其为chēng qí wèi chēng qí wèi "" " 侮辱性wǔ rǔ xìng wǔ rǔ xìng 的de de "" " 和hé hé "" " 刺耳cì ěr cì ěr 的de de "" " [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
In June 2018, a formal Senate Committee inquiry was established to examine replacing the prayers with a silent reflection period [6].
20182018 2018 年nián nián 66 6 月yuè yuè ,, , 正式zhèng shì zhèng shì 成立chéng lì chéng lì 了le le 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 调查diào chá diào chá ,, , 研究yán jiū yán jiū 用yòng yòng 静默jìng mò jìng mò 反思fǎn sī fǎn sī 期qī qī 取代qǔ dài qǔ dài 祈祷qí dǎo qí dǎo [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
After receiving approximately 820 submissions (the vast majority opposing change), the Committee recommended no change to the practice [7].
在zài zài 收到shōu dào shōu dào 约yuē yuē 820820 820 份fèn fèn 意见书yì jiàn shū yì jiàn shū (( ( 绝大多数jué dà duō shù jué dà duō shù 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 改变gǎi biàn gǎi biàn )) ) 后hòu hòu ,, , 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 不bù bù 改变gǎi biàn gǎi biàn 这一zhè yī zhè yī 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。 。

缺失背景

** * ** * 被bèi bèi 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 的de de 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 事实shì shí shì shí :: : 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 也yě yě 始终shǐ zhōng shǐ zhōng 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 改变gǎi biàn gǎi biàn 。。 。
**Critical omitted fact: Labor also consistently opposed these changes.** The claim frames this as a Coalition action, when in reality both major parties maintained identical positions on this issue.
** * ** * 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 将jiāng jiāng 此cǐ cǐ 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为wèi wèi 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 的de de 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi ,, , 而ér ér 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 两大liǎng dà liǎng dà 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 在zài zài 这zhè zhè 一yī yī 问题wèn tí wèn tí 上持shàng chí shàng chí 相同xiāng tóng xiāng tóng 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 。。 。
When Di Natale's 2014 motion was defeated, Labor Senator Claire Moore explicitly stated the ALP did not support the motion because a broader review of parliamentary procedure was underway [8].
当dāng dāng DiDi Di NataleNatale Natale 在zài zài 20142014 2014 年nián nián 提出tí chū tí chū 的de de 动议dòng yì dòng yì 被bèi bèi 否决fǒu jué fǒu jué 时shí shí ,, , 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán ClaireClaire Claire MooreMoore Moore 明确míng què míng què 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì ,, , 由于yóu yú yóu yú 正在zhèng zài zhèng zài 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 议会yì huì yì huì 程序chéng xù chéng xù 审查shěn chá shěn chá ,, , 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 不bù bù 支持zhī chí zhī chí 该gāi gāi 动议dòng yì dòng yì [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。 。
The defeat was bipartisan, not a Coalition-only position.
这次zhè cì zhè cì 否决fǒu jué fǒu jué 是shì shì 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 的de de 共同gòng tóng gòng tóng 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu 的de de 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 。。 。
The tradition has been maintained continuously since 1901 through: - Multiple Labor governments (Whitlam 1972-1975, Hawke/Keating 1983-1996, Rudd/Gillard 2007-2013) - Multiple Coalition governments - Various changes in parliamentary leadership and Speakers The Parliamentary Education Office notes that "there have been several attempts by senators and members... to change the standing orders to replace the prayers with an opportunity for personal prayer or reflection.
自zì zì 19011901 1901 年nián nián 以来yǐ lái yǐ lái ,, , 这一zhè yī zhè yī 传统chuán tǒng chuán tǒng 在zài zài 以下yǐ xià yǐ xià 时期shí qī shí qī 持续保持chí xù bǎo chí chí xù bǎo chí :: :
In voting against this change, some senators and members have argued the prayers at the beginning of each sitting day are a long standing and non-partisan tradition which re-affirms their commitment to the common good of Australia" [9].
-- - 多个duō gè duō gè 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ (( ( WhitlamWhitlam Whitlam 19721972 1972 -- - 19751975 1975 、、 、 HawkeHawke Hawke // / KeatingKeating Keating 19831983 1983 -- - 19961996 1996 、、 、 RuddRudd Rudd // / GillardGillard Gillard 20072007 2007 -- - 20132013 2013 )) )
-- - 多个duō gè duō gè 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ
-- - 各种gè zhǒng gè zhǒng 议会yì huì yì huì 领导层lǐng dǎo céng lǐng dǎo céng 和hé hé 议长yì zhǎng yì zhǎng 的de de 变动biàn dòng biàn dòng
议会yì huì yì huì 教育jiào yù jiào yù 办公室bàn gōng shì bàn gōng shì 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū ,, , "" " 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán 和hé hé 议员yì yuán yì yuán 们men men 曾多次céng duō cì céng duō cì 尝试cháng shì cháng shì 改变gǎi biàn gǎi biàn 议事规则yì shì guī zé yì shì guī zé ,, , 用yòng yòng 个人gè rén gè rén 祈祷qí dǎo qí dǎo 或huò huò 反思fǎn sī fǎn sī 的de de 机会jī huì jī huì 取代qǔ dài qǔ dài 祈祷qí dǎo qí dǎo 。。 。
在zài zài 投票tóu piào tóu piào 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 这一zhè yī zhè yī 改变gǎi biàn gǎi biàn 时shí shí ,, , 一些yī xiē yī xiē 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán 和hé hé 议员yì yuán yì yuán 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi ,, , 每次měi cì měi cì 开会kāi huì kāi huì 日rì rì 开始kāi shǐ kāi shǐ 时shí shí 的de de 祈祷qí dǎo qí dǎo 是shì shì 一个yí gè yí gè 长期存在cháng qī cún zài cháng qī cún zài 的de de 、、 、 非fēi fēi 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 的de de 传统chuán tǒng chuán tǒng ,, , 重申chóng shēn chóng shēn 了le le 他们tā men tā men 对duì duì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 共同利益gòng tóng lì yì gòng tóng lì yì 的de de 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò "" " [[ [ 99 9 ]] ] 。。 。

来源可信度评估

** * ** * 《《 《 悉尼xī ní xī ní 先驱xiān qū xiān qū 晨报chén bào chén bào 》》 》 (( ( SMHSMH SMH )) ) ** * ** * 是shì shì 提供tí gōng tí gōng 的de de 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán 。。 。
**The Sydney Morning Herald (SMH)** is the original source provided.
SMHSMH SMH 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 被bèi bèi 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 是shì shì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 、、 、 声誉shēng yù shēng yù 良好liáng hǎo liáng hǎo 的de de 报纸bào zhǐ bào zhǐ 。。 。
SMH is generally considered a mainstream, reputable Australian newspaper.
媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 偏见piān jiàn piān jiàn 评估píng gū píng gū 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng ,, , SMHSMH SMH 在zài zài 新闻报道xīn wén bào dào xīn wén bào dào 中zhōng zhōng 事实shì shí shì shí 报道bào dào bào dào 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què ,, , 偏见piān jiàn piān jiàn 极小jí xiǎo jí xiǎo ,, , 而ér ér 社论shè lùn shè lùn 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 略微lüè wēi lüè wēi 偏左piān zuǒ piān zuǒ [[ [ 1010 10 ]] ] 。。 。
Media bias assessments indicate SMH reports news factually with minimal bias in news coverage, while editorial positions lean slightly left [10].
所suǒ suǒ 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 的de de 20142014 2014 年nián nián 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 是shì shì 关于guān yú guān yú 绿党lǜ dǎng lǜ dǎng 动议dòng yì dòng yì 的de de 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 新闻报道xīn wén bào dào xīn wén bào dào ,, , 包含bāo hán bāo hán 事实shì shí shì shí 报道bào dào bào dào ,, , 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 明显míng xiǎn míng xiǎn 的de de 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 。。 。
The specific 2014 article cited is a straightforward news report on the Greens' motion, containing factual reporting without overt partisan framing.
SMHSMH SMH 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 了le le 辩论biàn lùn biàn lùn 双方shuāng fāng shuāng fāng 的de de 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn —— — —— — 绿党lǜ dǎng lǜ dǎng 领袖lǐng xiù lǐng xiù RichardRichard Richard DiDi Di NataleNatale Natale 称chēng chēng 祈祷qí dǎo qí dǎo "" " 是shì shì 一种yī zhǒng yī zhǒng 时代shí dài shí dài 错误cuò wù cuò wù "" " ,, , 而ér ér 自由党zì yóu dǎng zì yóu dǎng 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán EricEric Eric AbetzAbetz Abetz 将jiāng jiāng 此cǐ cǐ 举动jǔ dòng jǔ dòng 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为wèi wèi "" " 绿党lǜ dǎng lǜ dǎng 最新zuì xīn zuì xīn 的de de 攻击gōng jī gōng jī ,, , 是shì shì 他们tā men tā men 持续chí xù chí xù 试图shì tú shì tú 改写gǎi xiě gǎi xiě 我们wǒ men wǒ men 的de de 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ 、、 、 否认fǒu rèn fǒu rèn 我们wǒ men wǒ men 的de de 遗产yí chǎn yí chǎn 的de de 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The SMH article quotes both sides of the debate - Greens leader Richard Di Natale calling the prayer "an anachronism" and Liberal Senator Eric Abetz describing the move as "the latest Green attack as part of their ongoing attempt to rewrite our history and deny our heritage" [1].
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 也yě yě 做zuò zuò 过guò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng ?? ?
**Did Labor do something similar?** Search conducted: "Labor government parliamentary prayer tradition history" **Finding: Labor governments maintained the exact same practice throughout their terms in office.** The Parliamentary Library chronology documents that the Lord's Prayer has been recited at the start of each sitting day continuously since 1901, including through all Labor government periods [3]: - **Whitlam Government (1972-1975):** Prayers continued unchanged - **Hawke/Keating Governments (1983-1996):** Prayers continued unchanged - **Rudd/Gillard Governments (2007-2013):** Prayers continued unchanged, with an Acknowledgement of Country added in 2010 before the prayers In fact, Labor Senator Michael Beahan (Senate President 1993-1997) called for prayer-reading to be abolished in his 1996 valedictory speech, describing prayers as "archaic and anachronistic" [11].
** * ** *
However, the Labor Party as a whole did not adopt this position, and the practice continued unchanged under Labor governments.
搜索sōu suǒ sōu suǒ 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng :: : "" " LaborLabor Labor governmentgovernment government parliamentaryparliamentary parliamentary prayerprayer prayer traditiontradition tradition historyhistory history "" "
The 2018 Senate Committee inquiry that recommended retaining the prayers received support from Labor, Coalition, and crossbench senators who opposed the Greens' proposed changes [7].
** * ** * 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn :: : 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 其qí qí 任期rèn qī rèn qī 内nèi nèi 始终shǐ zhōng shǐ zhōng 维持wéi chí wéi chí 完全相同wán quán xiāng tóng wán quán xiāng tóng 的de de 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ 。。 。
** * ** *
议会yì huì yì huì 图书馆tú shū guǎn tú shū guǎn 年表nián biǎo nián biǎo 记载jì zǎi jì zǎi ,, , 自zì zì 19011901 1901 年nián nián 以来yǐ lái yǐ lái ,, , 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 时期shí qī shí qī 在内zài nèi zài nèi ,, , 主祷文zhǔ dǎo wén zhǔ dǎo wén 一直yì zhí yì zhí 在zài zài 每次měi cì měi cì 开会kāi huì kāi huì 日rì rì 开始kāi shǐ kāi shǐ 时shí shí 被bèi bèi 诵读sòng dú sòng dú [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] :: :
-- - ** * ** * WhitlamWhitlam Whitlam 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ (( ( 19721972 1972 -- - 19751975 1975 )) ) :: : ** * ** * 祈祷qí dǎo qí dǎo 持续chí xù chí xù 不变bù biàn bù biàn
-- - ** * ** * HawkeHawke Hawke // / KeatingKeating Keating 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ (( ( 19831983 1983 -- - 19961996 1996 )) ) :: : ** * ** * 祈祷qí dǎo qí dǎo 持续chí xù chí xù 不变bù biàn bù biàn
-- - ** * ** * RuddRudd Rudd // / GillardGillard Gillard 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ (( ( 20072007 2007 -- - 20132013 2013 )) ) :: : ** * ** * 祈祷qí dǎo qí dǎo 持续chí xù chí xù 不变bù biàn bù biàn ,, , 20102010 2010 年nián nián 在zài zài 祈祷qí dǎo qí dǎo 前qián qián 增加zēng jiā zēng jiā 了le le 对duì duì 原住民yuán zhù mín yuán zhù mín 的de de 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn
事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng ,, , 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán MichaelMichael Michael BeahanBeahan Beahan (( ( 19931993 1993 -- - 19971997 1997 年任nián rèn nián rèn 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 议长yì zhǎng yì zhǎng )) ) 在zài zài 19961996 1996 年nián nián 的de de 告别gào bié gào bié 演说yǎn shuō yǎn shuō 中zhōng zhōng 呼吁hū yù hū yù 废除fèi chú fèi chú 诵读sòng dú sòng dú 祈祷qí dǎo qí dǎo ,, , 将jiāng jiāng 其qí qí 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为wèi wèi "" " 过时guò shí guò shí 的de de 、、 、 时代shí dài shí dài 错误cuò wù cuò wù 的de de "" " [[ [ 1111 11 ]] ] 。。 。
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 一个yí gè yí gè 整体zhěng tǐ zhěng tǐ 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 采纳cǎi nà cǎi nà 这一zhè yī zhè yī 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng ,, , 在zài zài 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 期间qī jiān qī jiān 这一zhè yī zhè yī 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ 持续chí xù chí xù 不变bù biàn bù biàn 。。 。
20182018 2018 年nián nián 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 祈祷qí dǎo qí dǎo 的de de 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 调查diào chá diào chá 得到dé dào dé dào 了le le 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 绿党lǜ dǎng lǜ dǎng 提议tí yì tí yì 改变gǎi biàn gǎi biàn 的de de 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 、、 、 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 和hé hé 中立zhōng lì zhōng lì 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán 的de de 支持zhī chí zhī chí [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

虽然suī rán suī rán 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 确实què shí què shí 挫败cuò bài cuò bài 了le le 绿党lǜ dǎng lǜ dǎng 提出tí chū tí chū 的de de 删除shān chú shān chú 主祷文zhǔ dǎo wén zhǔ dǎo wén 的de de 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 动议dòng yì dòng yì (( ( 正如zhèng rú zhèng rú 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 所述suǒ shù suǒ shù )) ) ,, , 但dàn dàn 这zhè zhè 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 的de de 是shì shì 自zì zì 19011901 1901 年nián nián 以来yǐ lái yǐ lái 澳大利亚联邦ào dà lì yà lián bāng ào dà lì yà lián bāng 议会yì huì yì huì 的de de 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 共识gòng shí gòng shí 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu 的de de 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 。。 。
While the Coalition did defeat specific Greens motions to remove the Lord's Prayer (as the claim states), this represents the bipartisan consensus position of Australian federal parliaments since 1901, not a uniquely Coalition stance. **Arguments for retaining the prayers include:** - Recognition that the tradition affirms "commitment to the common good of Australia" [9] - The practice is voluntary - members are not required to attend or participate - Recognition of Australia's historical Christian cultural heritage - The 2018 Committee found insufficient momentum for change among parliamentarians [7] **Arguments for change include:** - Australia is a secular nation with no state religion - The 2016 Census showed 30% of Australians identify as having no religion, making them the largest "religious" group [5] - The prayer excludes non-Christian Australians (including those of other faiths and no faith) - The practice conflicts with the principle of separation of church and state **Key context:** This is not unique to the Coalition.
** * ** * 支持zhī chí zhī chí 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 祈祷qí dǎo qí dǎo 的de de 论点lùn diǎn lùn diǎn 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò :: : ** * ** *
Every Labor government has maintained this practice.
-- - 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn 传统chuán tǒng chuán tǒng "" " 重申chóng shēn chóng shēn 了le le 对duì duì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 共同利益gòng tóng lì yì gòng tóng lì yì 的de de 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò "" " [[ [ 99 9 ]] ]
The only Australian parliament to abolish the Lord's Prayer is the ACT Legislative Assembly, which since 1995 has invited members to "pray or reflect" in silence instead [4].
-- - 这一zhè yī zhè yī 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ 是shì shì 自愿zì yuàn zì yuàn 的de de —— — —— — 议员yì yuán yì yuán 不bù bù 需要xū yào xū yào 出席chū xí chū xí 或huò huò 参与cān yù cān yù
Following the 2022 election, the Labor Government made a modest change in September 2022: adding an invitation to "pray or reflect in your own way" before reading the traditional prayers, and moving the Acknowledgement of Country to occur first [12].
-- - 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 的de de 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ 基督教jī dū jiào jī dū jiào 文化遗产wén huà yí chǎn wén huà yí chǎn
The prayers themselves remain.
-- - 20182018 2018 年nián nián 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn 议员yì yuán yì yuán 中zhōng zhōng 缺乏quē fá quē fá 改变gǎi biàn gǎi biàn 的de de 动力dòng lì dòng lì [[ [ 77 7 ]] ]
** * ** * 支持zhī chí zhī chí 改变gǎi biàn gǎi biàn 的de de 论点lùn diǎn lùn diǎn 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò :: : ** * ** *
-- - 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 是shì shì 一个yí gè yí gè 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 国教guó jiào guó jiào 的de de 世俗shì sú shì sú 国家guó jiā guó jiā
-- - 20162016 2016 年nián nián 人口普查rén kǒu pǔ chá rén kǒu pǔ chá 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì ,, , 30%30% 30% 的de de 澳大利亚人ào dà lì yà rén ào dà lì yà rén 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 自己zì jǐ zì jǐ 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 宗教信仰zōng jiào xìn yǎng zōng jiào xìn yǎng ,, , 使shǐ shǐ 他们tā men tā men 成为chéng wéi chéng wéi 最大zuì dà zuì dà 的de de "" " 宗教zōng jiào zōng jiào "" " 群体qún tǐ qún tǐ [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
-- - 祈祷qí dǎo qí dǎo 排斥pái chì pái chì 非fēi fēi 基督教jī dū jiào jī dū jiào 澳大利亚人ào dà lì yà rén ào dà lì yà rén (( ( 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 其他qí tā qí tā 信仰xìn yǎng xìn yǎng 和hé hé 无wú wú 信仰者xìn yǎng zhě xìn yǎng zhě )) )
-- - 这一zhè yī zhè yī 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ 与yǔ yǔ 政教zhèng jiào zhèng jiào 分离fēn lí fēn lí 原则yuán zé yuán zé 相冲突xiāng chōng tū xiāng chōng tū
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng :: : ** * ** * 这zhè zhè 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu 。。 。
每个měi gè měi gè 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 都dōu dōu 维持wéi chí wéi chí 这一zhè yī zhè yī 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ 。。 。
唯一wéi yī wéi yī 废除fèi chú fèi chú 主祷文zhǔ dǎo wén zhǔ dǎo wén 的de de 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 议会yì huì yì huì 是shì shì ACTACT ACT 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 议会yì huì yì huì ,, , 自zì zì 19951995 1995 年nián nián 以来yǐ lái yǐ lái ,, , 该gāi gāi 议会yì huì yì huì 邀请yāo qǐng yāo qǐng 议员yì yuán yì yuán "" " 祈祷qí dǎo qí dǎo 或huò huò 反思fǎn sī fǎn sī "" " 静默jìng mò jìng mò 时刻shí kè shí kè ,, , 而ér ér 不是bú shì bú shì 诵读sòng dú sòng dú 传统chuán tǒng chuán tǒng 祈祷qí dǎo qí dǎo [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
20222022 2022 年nián nián 大选dà xuǎn dà xuǎn 后hòu hòu ,, , 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 20222022 2022 年nián nián 99 9 月yuè yuè 做出zuò chū zuò chū 了le le 适度shì dù shì dù 改变gǎi biàn gǎi biàn :: : 在zài zài 传统chuán tǒng chuán tǒng 祈祷qí dǎo qí dǎo 前qián qián 增加zēng jiā zēng jiā 了le le "" " 以yǐ yǐ 你nǐ nǐ 自己zì jǐ zì jǐ 的de de 方式fāng shì fāng shì 祈祷qí dǎo qí dǎo 或huò huò 反思fǎn sī fǎn sī "" " 的de de 邀请yāo qǐng yāo qǐng ,, , 并bìng bìng 将jiāng jiāng 对duì duì 原住民yuán zhù mín yuán zhù mín 的de de 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn 移yí yí 到dào dào 首位shǒu wèi shǒu wèi [[ [ 1212 12 ]] ] 。。 。
祈祷qí dǎo qí dǎo 本身běn shēn běn shēn 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 。。 。

部分属实

6.0

/ 10

该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 在zài zài 事实shì shí shì shí 层面céng miàn céng miàn 是shì shì 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 的de de —— — —— — 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 确实què shí què shí 挫败cuò bài cuò bài 了le le 停止tíng zhǐ tíng zhǐ 主祷文zhǔ dǎo wén zhǔ dǎo wén 的de de 动议dòng yì dòng yì 。。 。
The claim is factually true - the Coalition did defeat moves to cease the Lord's Prayer.
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 其qí qí 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng ,, , 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi 它tā tā 暗示àn shì àn shì 这是zhè shì zhè shì 一个yí gè yí gè 独特dú tè dú tè 的de de 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng ,, , 而ér ér 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 这zhè zhè 是shì shì 与yǔ yǔ 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 共享gòng xiǎng gòng xiǎng 的de de 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 。。 。
However, the framing is misleading as it implies this was a distinctive Coalition position when it was actually the bipartisan position shared with Labor.
两大liǎng dà liǎng dà 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 都dōu dōu 始终shǐ zhōng shǐ zhōng 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 绿党lǜ dǎng lǜ dǎng 提出tí chū tí chū 的de de 删除shān chú shān chú 祈祷qí dǎo qí dǎo 的de de 动议dòng yì dòng yì ,, , 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 其qí qí 任期rèn qī rèn qī 内nèi nèi 都dōu dōu 维持wéi chí wéi chí 完全相同wán quán xiāng tóng wán quán xiāng tóng 的de de 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ 。。 。
Both major parties have consistently opposed Greens motions to remove the prayers, and all Labor governments maintained this identical practice throughout their terms.
该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 同样tóng yàng tóng yàng 致力于zhì lì yú zhì lì yú 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 这一zhè yī zhè yī 传统chuán tǒng chuán tǒng 的de de 事实shì shí shì shí ,, , 使该shǐ gāi shǐ gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 的de de "" " 世俗shì sú shì sú "" " 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 暗示àn shì àn shì 了le le 一个yí gè yí gè 在实践中zài shí jiàn zhōng zài shí jiàn zhōng 并bìng bìng 不bù bù 存在cún zài cún zài 的de de 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 区别qū bié qū bié 。。 。
The claim omits that Labor has been equally committed to preserving this tradition, making the "secular" framing of the claim suggest a partisan distinction that does not exist in practice.

📚 来源与引用 (11)

  1. 1
    smh.com.au

    smh.com.au

    The Lord's Prayer in Federal Parliament is an anachronism, according to Greens senator Richard di Natale, who is calling to have the prayer scrapped.

    The Sydney Morning Herald
  2. 2
    parlinfo.aph.gov.au

    parlinfo.aph.gov.au

    Parlinfo Aph Gov

  3. 3
    aph.gov.au

    aph.gov.au

    This chronology briefly describes some of the key moments in the history of prayer-reading in the Australian Federal Parliament in order to show how the practice was established and evolved over time. A brief comparison of the current prayer-reading practices in Australian

    Aph Gov
  4. 4
    PDF

    full SOs 2Aug2022

    Aph Gov • PDF Document
  5. 5
    archive.junkee.com

    archive.junkee.com

    After the census showed that 30% of Australians are not religious, Greens Senator Lee Rhiannon wants the Lord's prayer cut from parliamentary proceeding.

    Junkee
  6. 6
    parlinfo.aph.gov.au

    parlinfo.aph.gov.au

    Parlinfo Aph Gov

  7. 7
    aph.gov.au

    aph.gov.au

    Background Standing order 50 provides for the President to read a prayer and make an acknowledgement of country on taking the chair on each sitting day: 50 Prayer and acknowledgement of country The President, on taking the chair each day, shall read the following prayer:

    Aph Gov
  8. 8
    peo.gov.au

    peo.gov.au

    Need help with a question about the Australian Parliament? The Parliamentary Education Office has the answers! Search the answers to already asked questions or, if you can't find the information you are looking for, ask your own question.

    Parliamentary Education Office
  9. 9
    mediabiasfactcheck.com

    mediabiasfactcheck.com

    LEFT-CENTER BIAS These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording

    Media Bias/Fact Check
  10. 10
    parlinfo.aph.gov.au

    parlinfo.aph.gov.au

    Parlinfo Aph Gov

  11. 11
    parlinfo.aph.gov.au

    parlinfo.aph.gov.au

    Parlinfo Aph Gov

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。