具有误导性

评分: 4.0/10

Coalition
C0849

声明内容

“对纳税人资助的900页审计委员会报告保密,该报告建议收紧老年人健康卡的资格。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis
分析时间: 1 Feb 2026

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

AbbottAbbott Abbott 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 于yú yú 20132013 2013 年nián nián 1010 10 月yuè yuè 成立chéng lì chéng lì 了le le 国家guó jiā guó jiā 审计shěn jì shěn jì 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì ,, , 由yóu yóu 企业家qǐ yè jiā qǐ yè jiā TonyTony Tony ShepherdShepherd Shepherd 担任dān rèn dān rèn 主席zhǔ xí zhǔ xí 。。 。
The Abbott government established the National Commission of Audit in October 2013, chaired by businessman Tony Shepherd.
该gāi gāi 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 的de de 任务rèn wù rèn wù 是shì shì 审查shěn chá shěn chá 英联邦yīng lián bāng yīng lián bāng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 支出zhī chū zhī chū 并bìng bìng 确定què dìng què dìng 节约jié yuē jié yuē 机会jī huì jī huì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The Commission was tasked with reviewing Commonwealth government expenditure and identifying savings opportunities [1].
委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 确实què shí què shí 制作zhì zuò zhì zuò 了le le 一份yī fèn yī fèn 全面quán miàn quán miàn 的de de 报告bào gào bào gào —— — —— — 20142014 2014 年nián nián 33 3 月yuè yuè 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 发布fā bù fā bù 的de de 第一阶段dì yī jiē duàn dì yī jiē duàn 报告bào gào bào gào 约yuē yuē 为wèi wèi 450450 450 页yè yè ,, , 而ér ér 完整wán zhěng wán zhěng 的de de 两liǎng liǎng 阶段jiē duàn jiē duàn 流程liú chéng liú chéng 涉及shè jí shè jí 大量文件dà liàng wén jiàn dà liàng wén jiàn [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The Commission did produce a comprehensive report - the Phase One report released publicly in March 2014 was approximately 450 pages, while the complete two-phase process involved extensive documentation [2].
委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 的de de 第一阶段dì yī jiē duàn dì yī jiē duàn 报告bào gào bào gào 确实què shí què shí 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 收紧shōu jǐn shōu jǐn 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 老年人lǎo nián rén lǎo nián rén 健康jiàn kāng jiàn kāng 卡kǎ kǎ (( ( CSHCCSHC CSHC )) ) 的de de 资格zī gé zī gé 。。 。
The Commission's Phase One report did indeed recommend tightening eligibility for the Commonwealth Seniors Health Card (CSHC).
报告bào gào bào gào 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 降低jiàng dī jiàng dī 该卡gāi kǎ gāi kǎ 的de de 收入shōu rù shōu rù 门槛mén kǎn mén kǎn ,, , 并bìng bìng 将jiāng jiāng 账户zhàng hù zhàng hù 型xíng xíng 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn 纳入nà rù nà rù 收入shōu rù shōu rù 测试cè shì cè shì —— — —— — 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 变化biàn huà biàn huà 将jiāng jiāng 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 许多xǔ duō xǔ duō 自筹资金zì chóu zī jīn zì chóu zī jīn 的de de 退休tuì xiū tuì xiū 人员rén yuán rén yuán [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
The report recommended that the income threshold for the card be lowered and that account-based pensions be included in the income test - changes that would have affected many self-funded retirees [3].
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 将jiāng jiāng 报告bào gào bào gào 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为wèi wèi "" " 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì "" " 是shì shì 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng 的de de 。。 。
However, the characterization of the report being "kept secret" is misleading.
第一阶段dì yī jiē duàn dì yī jiē duàn 报告bào gào bào gào 于yú yú 20142014 2014 年nián nián 33 3 月yuè yuè 66 6 日rì rì 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 发布fā bù fā bù ,, , 并bìng bìng 获得huò dé huò dé 了le le 大量dà liàng dà liàng 媒体报道méi tǐ bào dào méi tǐ bào dào [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
The Phase One report was publicly released on March 6, 2014, and received significant media coverage [4].
第二阶段dì èr jiē duàn dì èr jiē duàn 报告bào gào bào gào 于yú yú 20142014 2014 年nián nián 88 8 月yuè yuè 提交tí jiāo tí jiāo 给gěi gěi 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ ,, , 虽然suī rán suī rán 它tā tā 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 立即lì jí lì jí 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 发布fā bù fā bù ,, , 但dàn dàn 这zhè zhè 与yǔ yǔ 委托wěi tuō wěi tuō 报告bào gào bào gào 的de de 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ 一致yí zhì yí zhì —— — —— — 允许yǔn xǔ yǔn xǔ 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 发布fā bù fā bù 前有qián yǒu qián yǒu 时间shí jiān shí jiān 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 考虑kǎo lǜ kǎo lǜ [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
The Phase Two report was delivered to the government in August 2014 and while it was not immediately released publicly, this was consistent with standard government practice for receiving commissioned reports - allowing time for government consideration before public release [5].

缺失背景

** * ** * 报告bào gào bào gào 已yǐ yǐ 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 发布fā bù fā bù :: : ** * ** * 包含bāo hán bāo hán 老年人lǎo nián rén lǎo nián rén 健康jiàn kāng jiàn kāng 卡kǎ kǎ 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 的de de 第一阶段dì yī jiē duàn dì yī jiē duàn 报告bào gào bào gào 于yú yú 20142014 2014 年nián nián 33 3 月yuè yuè 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 发布fā bù fā bù ,, , 并bìng bìng 产生chǎn shēng chǎn shēng 了le le 大量dà liàng dà liàng 媒体报道méi tǐ bào dào méi tǐ bào dào ,, , 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 来源lái yuán lái yuán 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 的de de 《《 《 每日měi rì měi rì 电讯报diàn xùn bào diàn xùn bào 》》 》 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
**Report Was Publicly Released:** The Phase One report containing the seniors health card recommendations was publicly released in March 2014 and generated substantial media coverage, including the Daily Telegraph article cited as the source [4]. **Standard Government Process:** The Phase Two report was delivered to government in August 2014.
** * ** * 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 流程liú chéng liú chéng :: : ** * ** * 第二阶段dì èr jiē duàn dì èr jiē duàn 报告bào gào bào gào 于yú yú 20142014 2014 年nián nián 88 8 月yuè yuè 提交tí jiāo tí jiāo 给gěi gěi 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 。。 。
Not immediately releasing commissioned reports is standard practice across Australian governments of all persuasions, allowing time for cabinet consideration and policy formulation [5]. **Recommendations vs.
不bù bù 立即lì jí lì jí 发布fā bù fā bù 委托wěi tuō wěi tuō 报告bào gào bào gào 是shì shì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 各党派gè dǎng pài gè dǎng pài 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ ,, , 允许yǔn xǔ yǔn xǔ 内阁nèi gé nèi gé 考虑kǎo lǜ kǎo lǜ 和hé hé 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 制定zhì dìng zhì dìng 的de de 时间shí jiān shí jiān [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
Policy:** Importantly, the government did NOT implement the controversial recommendation to tighten seniors health card eligibility.
** * ** * 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 与yǔ yǔ 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè :: : ** * ** * 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 的de de 是shì shì ,, , 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 实施shí shī shí shī 收紧shōu jǐn shōu jǐn 老年人lǎo nián rén lǎo nián rén 健康jiàn kāng jiàn kāng 卡kǎ kǎ 资格zī gé zī gé 的de de 有yǒu yǒu 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 。。 。
Despite the Audit Commission's recommendation, the Abbott government chose not to proceed with changes to the CSHC means test in the 2014 Budget, reportedly due to concerns about backlash from self-funded retirees [6]. **Budget Context:** The Audit Commission was established as part of the Abbott government's effort to address what it characterized as a "budget emergency." The Commission's mandate was to identify spending reductions, and its recommendations were deliberately provocative to stimulate debate about the sustainability of various programs [7].
尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 审计shěn jì shěn jì 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 提出tí chū tí chū 了le le 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì ,, , 但dàn dàn AbbottAbbott Abbott 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 20142014 2014 年nián nián 预算yù suàn yù suàn 中zhōng zhōng 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 不bù bù 推进tuī jìn tuī jìn CSHCCSHC CSHC 收入shōu rù shōu rù 测试cè shì cè shì 的de de 变更biàn gēng biàn gēng ,, , 据jù jù 报道bào dào bào dào 是shì shì 出于chū yú chū yú 对duì duì 自筹资金zì chóu zī jīn zì chóu zī jīn 退休tuì xiū tuì xiū 人员rén yuán rén yuán 反弹fǎn tán fǎn tán 的de de 担忧dān yōu dān yōu [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 预算yù suàn yù suàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng :: : ** * ** * 审计shěn jì shěn jì 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 的de de 成立chéng lì chéng lì 是shì shì AbbottAbbott Abbott 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 应对yìng duì yìng duì 其所称qí suǒ chēng qí suǒ chēng 的de de "" " 预算yù suàn yù suàn 紧急状况jǐn jí zhuàng kuàng jǐn jí zhuàng kuàng "" " 的de de 努力nǔ lì nǔ lì 的de de 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn 。。 。
委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 的de de 授权shòu quán shòu quán 是shì shì 确定què dìng què dìng 支出zhī chū zhī chū 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn ,, , 其qí qí 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 故意gù yì gù yì 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 挑衅性tiǎo xìn xìng tiǎo xìn xìng ,, , 以yǐ yǐ 刺激cì jī cì jī 关于guān yú guān yú 各种gè zhǒng gè zhǒng 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 可持续性kě chí xù xìng kě chí xù xìng 的de de 辩论biàn lùn biàn lùn [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。 。

来源可信度评估

原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán 是shì shì 《《 《 每日měi rì měi rì 电讯报diàn xùn bào diàn xùn bào 》》 》 (( ( NewsNews News CorpCorp Corp )) ) ,, , 这是zhè shì zhè shì 一家yī jiā yī jiā 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 商业shāng yè shāng yè 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 。。 。
The original source is The Daily Telegraph (News Corp), a mainstream commercial media outlet.
虽然suī rán suī rán 在zài zài 报道bào dào bào dào 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 事实shì shí shì shí 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què ,, , 但dàn dàn 它tā tā 是shì shì NewsNews News CorpCorp Corp 网络wǎng luò wǎng luò 的de de 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn ,, , 该gāi gāi 网络wǎng luò wǎng luò 有yǒu yǒu 已知yǐ zhī yǐ zhī 的de de 编辑biān jí biān jí 倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng 。。 。
While generally factual in reporting, it is part of the News Corp network which has known editorial leanings.
所suǒ suǒ 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 的de de 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng (( ( "" " 审计shěn jì shěn jì 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 就jiù jiù 自筹资金zì chóu zī jīn zì chóu zī jīn 退休tuì xiū tuì xiū 人员rén yuán rén yuán 的de de 中产阶级zhōng chǎn jiē jí zhōng chǎn jiē jí 福利fú lì fú lì 向xiàng xiàng AbbottAbbott Abbott 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 提出tí chū tí chū 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn "" " )) ) 来自lái zì lái zì 20142014 2014 年nián nián 33 3 月yuè yuè ,, , 报道bào dào bào dào 的de de 是shì shì 第一阶段dì yī jiē duàn dì yī jiē duàn 报告bào gào bào gào 的de de 发布fā bù fā bù 。。 。
The specific article cited ("Audit Commission challenges Abbott government on middle-class welfare for self-funded retirees") from March 2014 would have reported on the Phase One report release.
NewsNews News CorpCorp Corp 在此期间zài cǐ qī jiān zài cǐ qī jiān 对duì duì AbbottAbbott Abbott 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 报道bào dào bào dào 总体zǒng tǐ zǒng tǐ 上shàng shàng 是shì shì 支持性zhī chí xìng zhī chí xìng 的de de ,, , 这zhè zhè 使得shǐ de shǐ de 批评性pī píng xìng pī píng xìng 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 值得注意zhí de zhù yì zhí de zhù yì [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。 。
News Corp coverage of the Abbott government during this period was generally supportive, making the critical framing notable [8].
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做过zuò guò zuò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng ?? ?
**Did Labor do something similar?** The Rudd/Gillard Labor governments also engaged in significant fiscal reviews and audit processes: - **Henry Tax Review (2008-2010):** The Rudd government commissioned a comprehensive review of Australia's tax system, chaired by Treasury Secretary Ken Henry.
** * ** *
The final report contained 138 recommendations, many of which were also politically sensitive.
RuddRudd Rudd // / GillardGillard Gillard 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 也yě yě 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 了le le 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 的de de 财政cái zhèng cái zhèng 审查shěn chá shěn chá 和hé hé 审计shěn jì shěn jì 流程liú chéng liú chéng :: :
The government selectively released and implemented recommendations, with some major recommendations (such as mining tax changes) being heavily modified or not implemented [9]. - **Gonski Review (2010-2011):** While not strictly an audit, this comprehensive review of school funding also involved extensive consultation and report production.
-- - ** * ** * HenryHenry Henry 税务shuì wù shuì wù 审查shěn chá shěn chá (( ( 20082008 2008 -- - 20102010 2010 年nián nián )) ) :: : ** * ** * RuddRudd Rudd 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 委托wěi tuō wěi tuō 对duì duì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 税制shuì zhì shuì zhì 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 全面quán miàn quán miàn 审查shěn chá shěn chá ,, , 由yóu yóu 财政部cái zhèng bù cái zhèng bù 秘书长mì shū zhǎng mì shū zhǎng KenKen Ken HenryHenry Henry 主持zhǔ chí zhǔ chí 。。 。
Some recommendations were implemented while others were modified or deferred [10]. - **Commission of Audit Precedent:** The Commission of Audit mechanism itself has been used by both sides of politics.
最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 报告bào gào bào gào 包含bāo hán bāo hán 138138 138 项xiàng xiàng 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì ,, , 其中qí zhōng qí zhōng 许多xǔ duō xǔ duō 也yě yě 是shì shì 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 敏感mǐn gǎn mǐn gǎn 的de de 。。 。
The Howard government established a similar Commission of Audit in 1996 upon taking office, which also made controversial recommendations for public service cuts and program reductions [11].
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 有yǒu yǒu 选择地xuǎn zé dì xuǎn zé dì 发布fā bù fā bù 和hé hé 实施shí shī shí shī 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì ,, , 一些yī xiē yī xiē 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì (( ( 如rú rú 矿业kuàng yè kuàng yè 税shuì shuì 变更biàn gēng biàn gēng )) ) 被bèi bèi 大幅dà fú dà fú 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi 或huò huò 未wèi wèi 实施shí shī shí shī [[ [ 99 9 ]] ] 。。 。
The practice of establishing reviews/audits and selectively implementing (or not implementing) recommendations is standard across Australian governments.
-- - ** * ** * GonskiGonski Gonski 审查shěn chá shěn chá (( ( 20102010 2010 -- - 20112011 2011 年nián nián )) ) :: : ** * ** * 虽然suī rán suī rán 严格来说yán gé lái shuō yán gé lái shuō 不是bú shì bú shì 审计shěn jì shěn jì ,, , 但dàn dàn 这项zhè xiàng zhè xiàng 关于guān yú guān yú 学校xué xiào xué xiào 资金zī jīn zī jīn 的de de 全面quán miàn quán miàn 审查shěn chá shěn chá 也yě yě 涉及shè jí shè jí 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 咨询zī xún zī xún 和hé hé 报告bào gào bào gào 制作zhì zuò zhì zuò 。。 。
The specific "secrecy" claim here relates to standard government processes for receiving reports, not an extraordinary suppression.
一些yī xiē yī xiē 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 被bèi bèi 实施shí shī shí shī ,, , 而ér ér 其他qí tā qí tā 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 被bèi bèi 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi 或huò huò 推迟tuī chí tuī chí [[ [ 1010 10 ]] ] 。。 。
-- - ** * ** * 审计shěn jì shěn jì 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 先例xiān lì xiān lì :: : ** * ** * 审计shěn jì shěn jì 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 机制jī zhì jī zhì 本身běn shēn běn shēn 曾céng céng 被bèi bèi 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 都dōu dōu 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 。。 。
HowardHoward Howard 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 19961996 1996 年nián nián 上任shàng rèn shàng rèn 时shí shí 成立chéng lì chéng lì 了le le 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 审计shěn jì shěn jì 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì ,, , 该gāi gāi 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 也yě yě 提出tí chū tí chū 了le le 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 公共服务gōng gòng fú wù gōng gòng fú wù 和hé hé 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 的de de 争议性zhēng yì xìng zhēng yì xìng 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì [[ [ 1111 11 ]] ] 。。 。
建立jiàn lì jiàn lì 审查shěn chá shěn chá // / 审计shěn jì shěn jì 并bìng bìng 有yǒu yǒu 选择地xuǎn zé dì xuǎn zé dì 实施shí shī shí shī (( ( 或huò huò 不bù bù 实施shí shī shí shī )) ) 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 的de de 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ 是shì shì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 各党派gè dǎng pài gè dǎng pài 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ 。。 。
这里zhè lǐ zhè lǐ 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 的de de "" " 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì "" " 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 涉及shè jí shè jí 接收jiē shōu jiē shōu 报告bào gào bào gào 的de de 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 流程liú chéng liú chéng ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 非同寻常fēi tóng xún cháng fēi tóng xún cháng 的de de 压制yā zhì yā zhì 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 混合hùn hé hùn hé 了le le 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 要素yào sù yào sù 和hé hé 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 。。 。
The claim contains a mixture of accurate elements and misleading framing.
审计shěn jì shěn jì 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 确实què shí què shí 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 收紧shōu jǐn shōu jǐn 老年人lǎo nián rén lǎo nián rén 健康jiàn kāng jiàn kāng 卡kǎ kǎ 资格zī gé zī gé ,, , 第二阶段dì èr jiē duàn dì èr jiē duàn 报告bào gào bào gào 也yě yě 确实què shí què shí 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 立即lì jí lì jí 向xiàng xiàng 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng 发布fā bù fā bù 。。 。
The Audit Commission did recommend tightening seniors health card eligibility, and the Phase Two report was not immediately released to the public.
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 将jiāng jiāng 其qí qí 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为wèi wèi "" " 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì "" " 夸大kuā dà kuā dà 了le le 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng —— — —— — 第一阶段dì yī jiē duàn dì yī jiē duàn 报告bào gào bào gào (( ( 包含bāo hán bāo hán 相关xiāng guān xiāng guān 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì )) ) 已yǐ yǐ 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 发布fā bù fā bù 并bìng bìng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 报道bào dào bào dào 。。 。
However, the characterization as "kept secret" overstates the situation - the Phase One report (containing the relevant recommendations) was publicly released and widely reported.
更gèng gèng 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 的de de 是shì shì ,, , 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 实施shí shī shí shī 老年人lǎo nián rén lǎo nián rén 健康jiàn kāng jiàn kāng 卡kǎ kǎ 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 的de de 事实shì shí shì shí 。。 。
More importantly, the claim omits that the government ultimately did NOT implement the seniors health card recommendation.
疏远shū yuǎn shū yuǎn 自筹资金zì chóu zī jīn zì chóu zī jīn 退休tuì xiū tuì xiū 人员rén yuán rén yuán 的de de 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 成本chéng běn chéng běn 被bèi bèi 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 太高tài gāo tài gāo ,, , 20142014 2014 年nián nián 预算yù suàn yù suàn 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 拟议nǐ yì nǐ yì 的de de CSHCCSHC CSHC 资格zī gé zī gé 收紧shōu jǐn shōu jǐn [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
The political cost of alienating self-funded retirees was deemed too high, and the 2014 Budget did not include the proposed tightening of CSHC eligibility [6].
"" " 纳税人nà shuì rén nà shuì rén 资助zī zhù zī zhù "" " 的de de 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 虽然suī rán suī rán 在技术上zài jì shù shàng zài jì shù shàng 是shì shì 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 的de de (( ( 公务员gōng wù yuán gōng wù yuán 和hé hé 委员wěi yuán wěi yuán 们men men 的de de 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 得到dé dào dé dào 了le le 报酬bào chóu bào chóu )) ) ,, , 但dàn dàn 某种程度mǒu zhǒng chéng dù mǒu zhǒng chéng dù 上shàng shàng 是shì shì 带有dài yǒu dài yǒu 倾向性qīng xiàng xìng qīng xiàng xìng 的de de 语言yǔ yán yǔ yán —— — —— — 根据gēn jù gēn jù 定义dìng yì dìng yì ,, , 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 运营yùn yíng yùn yíng 都dōu dōu 是shì shì 由yóu yóu 纳税人nà shuì rén nà shuì rén 资助zī zhù zī zhù 的de de 。。 。
The "taxpayer funded" characterization, while technically true (public servants and commissioners were paid for their work), is somewhat loaded language - all government operations are taxpayer funded by definition.
900900 900 页yè yè 的de de 数字shù zì shù zì 似乎sì hū sì hū 是shì shì 将jiāng jiāng 第一阶段dì yī jiē duàn dì yī jiē duàn 和hé hé 第二阶段dì èr jiē duàn dì èr jiē duàn 报告bào gào bào gào 合并hé bìng hé bìng ,, , 或者huò zhě huò zhě 可能kě néng kě néng 是shì shì 高估gāo gū gāo gū [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The 900-page figure appears to combine both Phase One and Phase Two reports or may be an overestimate [2].
这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 全面quán miàn quán miàn 的de de 财政cái zhèng cái zhèng 审查shěn chá shěn chá 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu 。。 。
This type of comprehensive fiscal review is not unique to the Coalition.
工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de HenryHenry Henry 税务shuì wù shuì wù 审查shěn chá shěn chá 同样tóng yàng tóng yàng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn (( ( 并且bìng qiě bìng qiě 同样tóng yàng tóng yàng 有yǒu yǒu 许多xǔ duō xǔ duō 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 未wèi wèi 实施shí shī shí shī 或huò huò 被bèi bèi 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi )) ) 。。 。
The Labor government's Henry Tax Review was similarly extensive (and similarly saw many recommendations not implemented or modified).
两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 都dōu dōu 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 此类cǐ lèi cǐ lèi 审查shěn chá shěn chá 为wèi wèi 艰难jiān nán jiān nán 决策jué cè jué cè 提供tí gōng tí gōng 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 掩护yǎn hù yǎn hù ,, , 同时tóng shí tóng shí 保持bǎo chí bǎo chí 拒绝jù jué jù jué 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 上shàng shàng 有毒yǒu dú yǒu dú 的de de 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 的de de 灵活性líng huó xìng líng huó xìng 。。 。
Both major parties use such reviews to provide political cover for difficult decisions while maintaining flexibility to reject politically toxic recommendations.

具有误导性

4.0

/ 10

虽然suī rán suī rán 审计shěn jì shěn jì 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 确实què shí què shí 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 收紧shōu jǐn shōu jǐn 老年人lǎo nián rén lǎo nián rén 健康jiàn kāng jiàn kāng 卡kǎ kǎ 资格zī gé zī gé 并bìng bìng 制作zhì zuò zhì zuò 了le le 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 报告bào gào bào gào ,, , 但dàn dàn 将jiāng jiāng 报告bào gào bào gào 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为wèi wèi "" " 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì "" " 是shì shì 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng 的de de 。。 。
While the Audit Commission did recommend tightening seniors health card eligibility and produced extensive reports, the characterization that the report was "kept secret" is misleading.
包含bāo hán bāo hán 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 的de de 第一阶段dì yī jiē duàn dì yī jiē duàn 报告bào gào bào gào 于yú yú 20142014 2014 年nián nián 33 3 月yuè yuè 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 发布fā bù fā bù ,, , 并bìng bìng 获得huò dé huò dé 了le le 大量dà liàng dà liàng 媒体报道méi tǐ bào dào méi tǐ bào dào 。。 。
The Phase One report containing these recommendations was publicly released in March 2014 and received significant media coverage.
该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 还hái hái 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 由于yóu yú yóu yú 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 担忧dān yōu dān yōu 而ér ér 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 不bù bù 实施shí shī shí shī 这一zhè yī zhè yī 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 的de de 事实shì shí shì shí 。。 。
The claim also omits that the government ultimately chose NOT to implement this specific recommendation due to political concerns.
"" " 纳税人nà shuì rén nà shuì rén 资助zī zhù zī zhù "" " 的de de 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 在技术上zài jì shù shàng zài jì shù shàng 是shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de ,, , 但dàn dàn 适用shì yòng shì yòng 于yú yú 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 运营yùn yíng yùn yíng 。。 。
The "taxpayer funded" framing is technically accurate but applies to all government operations.
"" " 900900 900 页yè yè "" " 的de de 数字shù zì shù zì 似乎sì hū sì hū 被bèi bèi 夸大kuā dà kuā dà 或huò huò 合并hé bìng hé bìng 了le le 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 阶段jiē duàn jiē duàn 的de de 审查shěn chá shěn chá 。。 。
The "900 page" figure appears inflated or combines both phases of the review.

📚 来源与引用 (2)

  1. 1
    web.archive.org

    web.archive.org

    Web Archive

    Original link no longer available
  2. 2
    web.archive.org

    web.archive.org

    Web Archive

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。