属实

评分: 7.0/10

Coalition
C0762

声明内容

“通过收紧残疾养老金领取资格并对在海外停留至少4周的人处以经济处罚,违背了选举承诺。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 包含bāo hán bāo hán 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 需要xū yào xū yào 分别fēn bié fēn bié 核实hé shí hé shí 的de de 不同bù tóng bù tóng 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng :: :
The claim contains TWO distinct allegations that require separate verification:
###### ### 11 1 .. . 残疾cán jí cán jí 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn 领取lǐng qǔ lǐng qǔ 资格zī gé zī gé 收紧shōu jǐn shōu jǐn
### 1. Disability Pension Eligibility Tightening
** * ** * 属实shǔ shí shǔ shí ** * ** * -- - 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 收紧shōu jǐn shōu jǐn 了le le 残疾cán jí cán jí 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn 领取lǐng qǔ lǐng qǔ 资格zī gé zī gé 。。 。
**TRUE** - The Coalition government did tighten disability pension eligibility.
20142014 2014 年nián nián 财政cái zhèng cái zhèng 预算案yù suàn àn yù suàn àn 对duì duì 残疾cán jí cán jí 支持zhī chí zhī chí 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn (( ( DSPDSP DSP )) ) 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 了le le 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé ,, , 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò :: :
The 2014 budget introduced changes to the Disability Support Pension (DSP) including: - The budget confirmed that "age and disability pensions will fall behind wages growth from 2017 after they are instead linked to inflation" [1]. - Changes to indexation were implemented, switching from male average earnings to the Consumer Price Index (CPI), which typically grows more slowly [2]. - The 2014 budget included significant welfare changes affecting disability recipients, as part of broader "structural savings" [3].
-- - 预算yù suàn yù suàn 确认què rèn què rèn "" " 从cóng cóng 20172017 2017 年nián nián 起qǐ qǐ ,, , 年龄nián líng nián líng 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn 和hé hé 残疾cán jí cán jí 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn 的de de 增长zēng zhǎng zēng zhǎng 将jiāng jiāng 落后luò hòu luò hòu 于yú yú 工资gōng zī gōng zī 增长zēng zhǎng zēng zhǎng ,, , 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn 将jiāng jiāng 与yǔ yǔ 通胀tōng zhàng tōng zhàng 挂钩guà gōu guà gōu 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 工资gōng zī gōng zī 增长zēng zhǎng zēng zhǎng "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
### 2. Overseas Travel Penalty (4 Weeks)
-- - 实施shí shī shí shī 了le le 指数化zhǐ shù huà zhǐ shù huà 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé ,, , 从cóng cóng 男性nán xìng nán xìng 平均píng jūn píng jūn 周zhōu zhōu 收入shōu rù shōu rù 转向zhuǎn xiàng zhuǎn xiàng 消费者xiāo fèi zhě xiāo fèi zhě 价格指数jià gé zhǐ shù jià gé zhǐ shù (( ( CPICPI CPI )) ) ,, , 后者hòu zhě hòu zhě 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 增长zēng zhǎng zēng zhǎng 较慢jiào màn jiào màn [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
**TRUE** - The government introduced changes to DSP portability: - Schedule 5 of the 2014 budget legislation introduced a change "to limit the overseas portability period for disability support pension to 28 days in a 12-month period from 1 January 2015" [4]. - This meant DSP recipients could only receive payments while overseas for a maximum of 28 days (4 weeks) in any 12-month period [4]. - Previously, DSP recipients had more generous portability provisions [5].
-- - 20142014 2014 年nián nián 预算案yù suàn àn yù suàn àn 包含bāo hán bāo hán 了le le 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 残疾cán jí cán jí 领取lǐng qǔ lǐng qǔ 人rén rén 的de de 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 福利fú lì fú lì 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé ,, , 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn "" " 结构性jié gòu xìng jié gòu xìng 节支jié zhī jié zhī "" " 的de de 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
### 3. Election Promise Break
###### ### 22 2 .. . 海外hǎi wài hǎi wài 旅行lǚ xíng lǚ xíng 处罚chǔ fá chǔ fá (( ( 44 4 周zhōu zhōu )) )
**TRUE** - Tony Abbott explicitly promised "no changes to pensions" before the 2013 election: - On the eve of the September 2013 federal election, Tony Abbott promised: "No changes to pensions" [1]. - The SMH documented this as one of several broken promises, noting: "Tuesday's budget confirmed age and disability pensions will fall behind wages growth from 2017" [1]. - The ABC confirmed Abbott's pre-election statement that "no-one's fortnightly pension or benefit will go down" was contradicted by the 2014 budget changes [3].
** * ** * 属实shǔ shí shǔ shí ** * ** * -- - 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 对duì duì DSPDSP DSP 的de de 境外jìng wài jìng wài 支付zhī fù zhī fù 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 了le le 调整tiáo zhěng tiáo zhěng :: :
-- - 20142014 2014 年nián nián 预算yù suàn yù suàn 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 附表fù biǎo fù biǎo 55 5 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù 了le le 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé ,, , "" " 从cóng cóng 20152015 2015 年nián nián 11 1 月yuè yuè 11 1 日起rì qǐ rì qǐ ,, , 将jiāng jiāng 残疾cán jí cán jí 支持zhī chí zhī chí 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn 的de de 境外jìng wài jìng wài 支付zhī fù zhī fù 期限qī xiàn qī xiàn 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 为wèi wèi 1212 12 个gè gè 月yuè yuè 内nèi nèi 累计lěi jì lěi jì 2828 28 天tiān tiān "" " [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
-- - 这zhè zhè 意味着yì wèi zhe yì wèi zhe DSPDSP DSP 领取lǐng qǔ lǐng qǔ 人rén rén 在zài zài 任何rèn hé rèn hé 1212 12 个gè gè 月yuè yuè 期间qī jiān qī jiān 内nèi nèi 只能zhǐ néng zhǐ néng 在zài zài 海外hǎi wài hǎi wài 停留tíng liú tíng liú 最多zuì duō zuì duō 2828 28 天tiān tiān (( ( 44 4 周zhōu zhōu )) ) 并bìng bìng 继续jì xù jì xù 领取lǐng qǔ lǐng qǔ 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
-- - 此前cǐ qián cǐ qián ,, , DSPDSP DSP 领取lǐng qǔ lǐng qǔ 人rén rén 享有xiǎng yǒu xiǎng yǒu 更gèng gèng 宽松kuān sōng kuān sōng 的de de 境外jìng wài jìng wài 支付zhī fù zhī fù 条款tiáo kuǎn tiáo kuǎn [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
###### ### 33 3 .. . 选举xuǎn jǔ xuǎn jǔ 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 违背wéi bèi wéi bèi
** * ** * 属实shǔ shí shǔ shí ** * ** * -- - TonyTony Tony AbbottAbbott Abbott 在zài zài 20132013 2013 年nián nián 大选dà xuǎn dà xuǎn 前qián qián 明确míng què míng què 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò "" " 不bù bù 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn "" " :: :
-- - 在zài zài 20132013 2013 年nián nián 99 9 月yuè yuè 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 大选dà xuǎn dà xuǎn 前夕qián xī qián xī ,, , TonyTony Tony AbbottAbbott Abbott 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò :: : "" " 不bù bù 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
-- - 《《 《 悉尼xī ní xī ní 先驱xiān qū xiān qū 晨报chén bào chén bào 》》 》 将jiāng jiāng 此cǐ cǐ 记录jì lù jì lù 为wèi wèi 多项duō xiàng duō xiàng 违背wéi bèi wéi bèi 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 之一zhī yī zhī yī ,, , 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū :: : "" " 周二zhōu èr zhōu èr 的de de 预算案yù suàn àn yù suàn àn 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí ,, , 从cóng cóng 20172017 2017 年nián nián 起qǐ qǐ ,, , 年龄nián líng nián líng 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn 和hé hé 残疾cán jí cán jí 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn 的de de 增长zēng zhǎng zēng zhǎng 将jiāng jiāng 落后luò hòu luò hòu 于yú yú 工资gōng zī gōng zī 增长zēng zhǎng zēng zhǎng "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
-- - 澳大利亚广播公司ào dà lì yà guǎng bō gōng sī ào dà lì yà guǎng bō gōng sī 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí ,, , AbbottAbbott Abbott 选前xuǎn qián xuǎn qián 声明shēng míng shēng míng "" " 任何人rèn hé rén rèn hé rén 的de de 双周shuāng zhōu shuāng zhōu 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn 或huò huò 福利金fú lì jīn fú lì jīn 都dōu dōu 不会bú huì bú huì 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo "" " 与yǔ yǔ 20142014 2014 年nián nián 预算yù suàn yù suàn 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 相xiāng xiāng 矛盾máo dùn máo dùn [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。

缺失背景

该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 的de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 要素yào sù yào sù :: :
The claim omits several important contextual elements:
###### ### 预算yù suàn yù suàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng
### Budget Context
20142014 2014 年nián nián 预算案yù suàn àn yù suàn àn 被bèi bèi 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 框定kuāng dìng kuāng dìng 为wèi wèi 应对yìng duì yìng duì "" " 赤字chì zì chì zì 危机wēi jī wēi jī "" " ,, , JoeJoe Joe HockeyHockey Hockey 宣布xuān bù xuān bù "" " 福利fú lì fú lì 时代shí dài shí dài 已经yǐ jīng yǐ jīng 结束jié shù jié shù "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The 2014 budget was framed by the government as addressing a "deficit crisis" with Joe Hockey declaring "the age of entitlement is over" [2].
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 辩称biàn chēng biàn chēng 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 对duì duì 长期cháng qī cháng qī 预算yù suàn yù suàn 可持续性kě chí xù xìng kě chí xù xìng 是shì shì 必要bì yào bì yào 的de de [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
The government argued these changes were necessary for long-term budget sustainability [3].
###### ### 分阶段fēn jiē duàn fēn jiē duàn 实施shí shī shí shī
### Gradual Implementation
养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn 指数化zhǐ shù huà zhǐ shù huà 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 立即lì jí lì jí 生效shēng xiào shēng xiào —— — —— — 而是ér shì ér shì 安排ān pái ān pái 在zài zài 20172017 2017 年nián nián 实施shí shī shí shī ,, , 即jí jí 下届xià jiè xià jiè 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 大选dà xuǎn dà xuǎn 之后zhī hòu zhī hòu [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
The pension indexation changes were not immediate - they were scheduled to take effect from 2017, after the next federal election [1][3].
这zhè zhè 提供tí gōng tí gōng 了le le 调整tiáo zhěng tiáo zhěng 时间shí jiān shí jiān 和hé hé 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 问责wèn zé wèn zé 的de de 空间kōng jiān kōng jiān 。。 。
This allowed time for adjustment and political accountability.
###### ### 部分bù fèn bù fèn 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú
### Partial Preservation
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 实施shí shī shí shī 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 可能kě néng kě néng 的de de 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn —— — —— — 他们tā men tā men "" " 未wèi wèi 触及chù jí chù jí 国家guó jiā guó jiā 残疾cán jí cán jí 保险bǎo xiǎn bǎo xiǎn 计划jì huà jì huà "" " ,, , 也yě yě 未wèi wèi 按àn àn 审计shěn jì shěn jì 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 将jiāng jiāng 家庭jiā tíng jiā tíng 住房zhù fáng zhù fáng 纳入nà rù nà rù 资产zī chǎn zī chǎn 测试cè shì cè shì [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
The government did not implement all possible cuts - they "hasn't touched the National Disability Insurance Scheme" and did not include the family home in assets tests as recommended by the Commission of Audit [3].
###### ### 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ 模式mó shì mó shì
### Historical Pattern
违背wéi bèi wéi bèi 预算yù suàn yù suàn 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu 。。 。
Promise-breaking on budgets is not unique to the Coalition.
澳大利亚广播公司ào dà lì yà guǎng bō gōng sī ào dà lì yà guǎng bō gōng sī 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū ,, , "" " PaulPaul Paul KeatingKeating Keating 放弃fàng qì fàng qì 了le le 他tā tā 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 通过tōng guò tōng guò 的de de 减税jiǎn shuì jiǎn shuì 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 。。 。
The ABC noted that "Paul Keating abandoned tax cuts he legislated.
JohnJohn John HowardHoward Howard 提出tí chū tí chū 了le le 核心hé xīn hé xīn 与yǔ yǔ 非核心fēi hé xīn fēi hé xīn 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 的de de 概念gài niàn gài niàn 。。 。
John Howard introduced the concept of core and non-core promises.
而ér ér KevinKevin Kevin RuddRudd Rudd 和hé hé JuliaJulia Julia GillardGillard Gillard 则zé zé 为wèi wèi 他们tā men tā men 在zài zài 碳tàn tàn 定价dìng jià dìng jià 问题wèn tí wèn tí 上shàng shàng 的de de 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 逆转nì zhuǎn nì zhuǎn 付出fù chū fù chū 了le le 代价dài jià dài jià "" " [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
And Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard paid for reverses in their promises on carbon pricing" [3].

来源可信度评估

** * ** * 《《 《 卫报wèi bào wèi bào 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 》》 》 ** * ** * (( ( 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán 之一zhī yī zhī yī )) ) :: : 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 偏见piān jiàn piān jiàn // / 事实shì shí shì shí 核查hé chá hé chá 将jiāng jiāng 《《 《 卫报wèi bào wèi bào 》》 》 评为píng wèi píng wèi "" " 中zhōng zhōng 左翼zuǒ yì zuǒ yì "" " 偏见piān jiàn piān jiàn ,, , "" " 混合hùn hé hùn hé "" " 事实shì shí shì shí 报道bào dào bào dào 。。 。
**The Guardian Australia** (one of the original sources): Media Bias/Fact Check rates The Guardian as "left-center" biased with "mixed" factual reporting.
虽然suī rán suī rán 事实shì shí shì shí 报道bào dào bào dào 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 可靠kě kào kě kào ,, , 但dàn dàn 其qí qí 编辑biān jí biān jí 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 略偏lüè piān lüè piān 中zhōng zhōng 左翼zuǒ yì zuǒ yì [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
While generally reliable for factual reporting, it has a center-left editorial stance [6].
该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 的de de 《《 《 卫报wèi bào wèi bào 》》 》 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 关注guān zhù guān zhù 福利fú lì fú lì 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 的de de 负面影响fù miàn yǐng xiǎng fù miàn yǐng xiǎng ,, , 这zhè zhè 与其yǔ qí yǔ qí 编辑biān jí biān jí 视角shì jiǎo shì jiǎo 一致yí zhì yí zhì [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。 。
The Guardian article cited in the claim focuses on the negative impacts of welfare changes, which aligns with its editorial perspective [7]. **The Conversation**: A nonprofit academic journalism platform with generally high credibility.
** * ** * TheThe The ConversationConversation Conversation ** * ** * :: : 一家yī jiā yī jiā 非营利fēi yíng lì fēi yíng lì 学术xué shù xué shù 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 平台píng tái píng tái ,, , 可信度kě xìn dù kě xìn dù 普遍pǔ biàn pǔ biàn 较jiào jiào 高gāo gāo 。。 。
Its infographic comparing promises to budget measures provides factual documentation of the discrepancies. **Pro Bono Australia**: A social sector news outlet focused on nonprofit and community sector issues.
其qí qí 将jiāng jiāng 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 与yǔ yǔ 预算yù suàn yù suàn 措施cuò shī cuò shī 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào 的de de 信息xìn xī xìn xī 图tú tú 提供tí gōng tí gōng 了le le 差异chā yì chā yì 的de de 事实shì shí shì shí 记录jì lù jì lù 。。 。
Tends to advocate for social service funding.
** * ** * ProPro Pro BonoBono Bono AustraliaAustralia Australia ** * ** * :: : 一家yī jiā yī jiā 专注zhuān zhù zhuān zhù 于yú yú 非营利fēi yíng lì fēi yíng lì 和hé hé 社区shè qū shè qū 部门bù mén bù mén 问题wèn tí wèn tí 的de de 社会shè huì shè huì 领域lǐng yù lǐng yù 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 机构jī gòu jī gòu 。。 。
倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng 于yú yú 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 社会shè huì shè huì 服务fú wù fú wù 资金zī jīn zī jīn 。。 。
⚖️

工党对比

###### ### 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做过zuò guò zuò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng ?? ?
### Did Labor do something similar?
** * ** * 是shì shì —— — —— — 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 也yě yě 对duì duì 残疾cán jí cán jí 福利fú lì fú lì 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 了le le 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé :: : ** * ** *
**YES - Labor also made significant disability welfare changes:** 1. **Rudd/Gillard Governments (2007-2013)**: The Labor government made substantial changes to disability policy.
11 1 .. . ** * ** * RuddRudd Rudd // / GillardGillard Gillard 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ (( ( 20072007 2007 -- - 20132013 2013 )) ) ** * ** * :: : 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 对duì duì 残疾cán jí cán jí 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 了le le 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 调整tiáo zhěng tiáo zhěng 。。 。
Academic analysis notes "radical reconfiguration of disability policy" occurred under the preceding Howard government, and the Rudd government maintained both "continuities and changes" in disability policy administration [8]. 2. **Disability Pension History**: Research on Australian disability policy shows that both major parties have historically adjusted eligibility criteria based on economic and fiscal circumstances.
学术xué shù xué shù 分析fēn xī fēn xī 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū ,, , 在zài zài 前任qián rèn qián rèn HowardHoward Howard 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 时期shí qī shí qī 残疾cán jí cán jí 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 发生fā shēng fā shēng 了le le "" " 根本性gēn běn xìng gēn běn xìng 重组chóng zǔ chóng zǔ "" " ,, , 而ér ér RuddRudd Rudd 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 残疾cán jí cán jí 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 管理guǎn lǐ guǎn lǐ 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 既jì jì 保持bǎo chí bǎo chí 了le le "" " 连续性lián xù xìng lián xù xìng 也yě yě 有yǒu yǒu 变化biàn huà biàn huà "" " [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。 。
The Howard government (1996-2007) made particularly "contentious and dramatic changes to disability policy" [8]. 3. **Gillard Government NDIS**: While expanding disability support through the NDIS (which began rollout under Gillard), Labor also implemented cost-containment measures in other welfare areas. 4. **Historical Context**: Disability pension tightening has been a bipartisan approach when governments face budget pressures.
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 残疾cán jí cán jí 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ ** * ** * :: : 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 残疾cán jí cán jí 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 研究yán jiū yán jiū 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng ,, , 两大liǎng dà liǎng dà 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ 上shàng shàng 都dōu dōu 曾céng céng 根据gēn jù gēn jù 经济jīng jì jīng jì 和hé hé 财政状况cái zhèng zhuàng kuàng cái zhèng zhuàng kuàng 调整tiáo zhěng tiáo zhěng 领取lǐng qǔ lǐng qǔ 资格zī gé zī gé 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 。。 。
The claim's framing suggests this was unique to the Coalition, but budgetary constraints on welfare have been addressed by governments of both persuasions.
HowardHoward Howard 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ (( ( 19961996 1996 -- - 20072007 2007 )) ) 对duì duì 残疾cán jí cán jí 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 了le le "" " 特别tè bié tè bié 有yǒu yǒu 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì 和hé hé 戏剧性xì jù xìng xì jù xìng 的de de 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé "" " [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。 。
### Key Difference
33 3 .. . ** * ** * GillardGillard Gillard 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 国家guó jiā guó jiā 残疾cán jí cán jí 保险bǎo xiǎn bǎo xiǎn 计划jì huà jì huà ** * ** * :: : 虽然suī rán suī rán 通过tōng guò tōng guò 国家guó jiā guó jiā 残疾cán jí cán jí 保险bǎo xiǎn bǎo xiǎn 计划jì huà jì huà (( ( NDISNDIS NDIS )) ) 扩大kuò dà kuò dà 了le le 残疾cán jí cán jí 支持zhī chí zhī chí (( ( 在zài zài GillardGillard Gillard 任内rèn nèi rèn nèi 开始kāi shǐ kāi shǐ 推广tuī guǎng tuī guǎng )) ) ,, , 但dàn dàn 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 也yě yě 在zài zài 其他qí tā qí tā 福利fú lì fú lì 领域lǐng yù lǐng yù 实施shí shī shí shī 了le le 成本chéng běn chéng běn 控制措施kòng zhì cuò shī kòng zhì cuò shī 。。 。
The primary distinction is that the Abbott government made explicit pre-election promises not to change pensions, which were then broken.
44 4 .. . ** * ** * 历史背景lì shǐ bèi jǐng lì shǐ bèi jǐng ** * ** * :: : 残疾cán jí cán jí 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn 收紧shōu jǐn shōu jǐn 在zài zài 联邦政府lián bāng zhèng fǔ lián bāng zhèng fǔ 面临miàn lín miàn lín 预算yù suàn yù suàn 压力yā lì yā lì 时是shí shì shí shì 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 共同gòng tóng gòng tóng 的de de 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ 。。 。
While Labor also implemented welfare changes, they generally did not make categorical pre-election promises against such changes.
该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 的de de 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 暗示àn shì àn shì 这是zhè shì zhè shì 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu 的de de 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi ,, , 但dàn dàn 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 都dōu dōu 曾céng céng 应对yìng duì yìng duì 福利fú lì fú lì 预算yù suàn yù suàn 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 。。 。
###### ### 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 区别qū bié qū bié
主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 区别qū bié qū bié 在于zài yú zài yú ,, , AbbottAbbott Abbott 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 选前xuǎn qián xuǎn qián 明确míng què míng què 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 不bù bù 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn ,, , 随后suí hòu suí hòu 却què què 违背wéi bèi wéi bèi 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 。。 。
虽然suī rán suī rán 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 也yě yě 实施shí shī shí shī 了le le 福利fú lì fú lì 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé ,, , 但dàn dàn 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 不会bú huì bú huì 在zài zài 大选dà xuǎn dà xuǎn 前qián qián 做出zuò chū zuò chū 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 此类cǐ lèi cǐ lèi 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 的de de 绝对jué duì jué duì 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

###### ### 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 辩解biàn jiě biàn jiě
### Government Justification
联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 辩称biàn chēng biàn chēng :: :
The Coalition government argued that: - The budget faced a structural deficit that required difficult decisions [2] - Pension indexation changes were necessary for long-term fiscal sustainability [3] - The changes were relatively modest (starting 2017, not immediate) [1] - They preserved core disability support structures (NDIS untouched) [3]
-- - 预算yù suàn yù suàn 面临miàn lín miàn lín 结构性jié gòu xìng jié gòu xìng 赤字chì zì chì zì ,, , 需要xū yào xū yào 做出zuò chū zuò chū 艰难jiān nán jiān nán 决定jué dìng jué dìng [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
### Critics' Response
-- - 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn 指数化zhǐ shù huà zhǐ shù huà 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 对duì duì 长期cháng qī cháng qī 财政cái zhèng cái zhèng 可持续性kě chí xù xìng kě chí xù xìng 是shì shì 必要bì yào bì yào 的de de [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
Opponents argued: - The changes broke explicit election promises [1][3] - The shift from wages-based to CPI indexation would gradually erode pension real value - The 28-day overseas limit disadvantaged DSP recipients with family connections abroad - The burden fell disproportionately on vulnerable populations [2]
-- - 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 相对xiāng duì xiāng duì 温和wēn hé wēn hé (( ( 20172017 2017 年nián nián 才cái cái 开始kāi shǐ kāi shǐ ,, , 非fēi fēi 立即lì jí lì jí 生效shēng xiào shēng xiào )) ) [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
### Comparative Context
-- - 他们tā men tā men 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 了le le 核心hé xīn hé xīn 残疾cán jí cán jí 支持zhī chí zhī chí 结构jié gòu jié gòu (( ( 未wèi wèi 触动chù dòng chù dòng NDISNDIS NDIS )) ) [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
While the claim is factually accurate, it lacks historical context.
###### ### 批评者pī píng zhě pī píng zhě 回应huí yìng huí yìng
Australian governments of both major parties have adjusted welfare eligibility when facing fiscal pressures.
反对者fǎn duì zhě fǎn duì zhě 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi :: :
The Coalition's 2014 changes were: - More significant in scale than some Labor adjustments - Particularly notable due to the explicit pre-election promise - Part of a broader pattern of budget repair attempts **Key context:** This WAS a broken promise, and the factual claims about tightening eligibility and overseas travel restrictions are accurate.
-- - 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 违背wéi bèi wéi bèi 了le le 明确míng què míng què 的de de 选举xuǎn jǔ xuǎn jǔ 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
However, welfare adjustments are a standard feature of Australian budget management across both parties, though the Coalition's explicit promise made their changes more politically significant.
-- - 从cóng cóng 工资gōng zī gōng zī 挂钩guà gōu guà gōu 转向zhuǎn xiàng zhuǎn xiàng CPICPI CPI 指数化zhǐ shù huà zhǐ shù huà 将jiāng jiāng 逐步zhú bù zhú bù 侵蚀qīn shí qīn shí 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn 的de de 实际shí jì shí jì 价值jià zhí jià zhí
-- - 2828 28 天tiān tiān 境外jìng wài jìng wài 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 对duì duì 在zài zài 海外hǎi wài hǎi wài 有yǒu yǒu 家庭jiā tíng jiā tíng 关系guān xì guān xì 的de de DSPDSP DSP 领取lǐng qǔ lǐng qǔ 人rén rén 不利bù lì bù lì
-- - 负担fù dān fù dān 不成比例bù chéng bǐ lì bù chéng bǐ lì 地落dì luò dì luò 在zài zài 弱势ruò shì ruò shì 人群rén qún rén qún 身上shēn shàng shēn shàng [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
###### ### 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng
虽然suī rán suī rán 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 在zài zài 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què ,, , 但dàn dàn 缺乏quē fá quē fá 历史背景lì shǐ bèi jǐng lì shǐ bèi jǐng 。。 。
澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 两大liǎng dà liǎng dà 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 的de de 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 面临miàn lín miàn lín 财政cái zhèng cái zhèng 压力yā lì yā lì 时shí shí 都dōu dōu 曾céng céng 调整tiáo zhěng tiáo zhěng 过guò guò 福利fú lì fú lì 领取lǐng qǔ lǐng qǔ 资格zī gé zī gé 。。 。
联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 20142014 2014 年nián nián 的de de 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé :: :
-- - 规模guī mó guī mó 大于dà yú dà yú 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 的de de 一些yī xiē yī xiē 调整tiáo zhěng tiáo zhěng
-- - 因选前yīn xuǎn qián yīn xuǎn qián 的de de 明确míng què míng què 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 而ér ér 特别tè bié tè bié 引人注目yǐn rén zhù mù yǐn rén zhù mù
-- - 是shì shì 预算yù suàn yù suàn 修复xiū fù xiū fù 尝试cháng shì cháng shì 的de de 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 模式mó shì mó shì 的de de 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng :: : ** * ** * 这zhè zhè 确实què shí què shí 是shì shì 违背wéi bèi wéi bèi 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò ,, , 关于guān yú guān yú 收紧shōu jǐn shōu jǐn 领取lǐng qǔ lǐng qǔ 资格zī gé zī gé 和hé hé 境外jìng wài jìng wài 旅行lǚ xíng lǚ xíng 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 的de de 事实陈述shì shí chén shù shì shí chén shù 是shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de 。。 。
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 福利fú lì fú lì 调整tiáo zhěng tiáo zhěng 是shì shì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 预算yù suàn yù suàn 管理guǎn lǐ guǎn lǐ 的de de 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 特征tè zhēng tè zhēng ,, , 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 的de de 明确míng què míng què 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 使shǐ shǐ 其qí qí 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 在政治上zài zhèng zhì shàng zài zhèng zhì shàng 更加gèng jiā gèng jiā 显著xiǎn zhù xiǎn zhù 。。 。

属实

7.0

/ 10

该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 在zài zài 各gè gè 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 均jūn jūn 属实shǔ shí shǔ shí 。。 。
The claim is factually accurate on all counts.
联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 违背wéi bèi wéi bèi 了le le 选举xuǎn jǔ xuǎn jǔ 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò ,, , 收紧shōu jǐn shōu jǐn 了le le 残疾cán jí cán jí 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn 领取lǐng qǔ lǐng qǔ 资格zī gé zī gé (( ( 通过tōng guò tōng guò 指数化zhǐ shù huà zhǐ shù huà 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé )) ) ,, , 并bìng bìng 确实què shí què shí 对duì duì DSPDSP DSP 领取lǐng qǔ lǐng qǔ 人rén rén 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù 了le le 2828 28 天tiān tiān 境外jìng wài jìng wài 旅行lǚ xíng lǚ xíng 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 。。 。
The Coalition government did break an election promise by tightening disability pension eligibility (through indexation changes) and did introduce the 28-day overseas travel limitation for DSP recipients.
TonyTony Tony AbbottAbbott Abbott 在zài zài 20132013 2013 年nián nián 大选dà xuǎn dà xuǎn 前qián qián 明确míng què míng què 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò "" " 不bù bù 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] ,, , 而ér ér 20142014 2014 年nián nián 预算案yù suàn àn yù suàn àn 包含bāo hán bāo hán 了le le 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 确切què qiè què qiè 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
Tony Abbott explicitly promised "no changes to pensions" before the 2013 election [1], and the 2014 budget contained these exact changes [2][3][4].
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 如能rú néng rú néng 补充bǔ chōng bǔ chōng 以下yǐ xià yǐ xià 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 将jiāng jiāng 更gèng gèng 完善wán shàn wán shàn :: :
However, the claim would benefit from context noting that: 1.
11 1 .. . 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 是shì shì 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 预算yù suàn yù suàn 修复xiū fù xiū fù 努力nǔ lì nǔ lì 的de de 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn 实施shí shī shí shī 的de de
These changes were implemented as part of broader budget repair efforts 2.
22 2 .. . 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 安排ān pái ān pái 在zài zài 20172017 2017 年nián nián 实施shí shī shí shī ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 立即lì jí lì jí 生效shēng xiào shēng xiào
They were scheduled for 2017, not immediate implementation 3.
33 3 .. . 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ 上shàng shàng ,, , 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 都dōu dōu 曾céng céng 调整tiáo zhěng tiáo zhěng 过guò guò 福利fú lì fú lì 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè
Welfare adjustments have historically been made by governments of both parties 4.
44 4 .. . 国家guó jiā guó jiā 残疾cán jí cán jí 保险bǎo xiǎn bǎo xiǎn 计划jì huà jì huà 未受wèi shòu wèi shòu 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng
The NDIS was preserved untouched

📚 来源与引用 (8)

  1. 1
    "Then and now: the Abbott government's broken promises"

    "Then and now: the Abbott government's broken promises"

    On the eve of the 2013 federal election Tony Abbott promised no cuts to education, health, or the ABC and SBS, and no changes to pensions. Fairfax Media looks at how those promises fared in the Abbott government's first budget.

    The Sydney Morning Herald
  2. 2
    "2014 Australian federal budget"

    "2014 Australian federal budget"

    Wikipedia
  3. 3
    "Budget 2014: Tony Abbott and Joe Hockey walking fine line on broken promises"

    "Budget 2014: Tony Abbott and Joe Hockey walking fine line on broken promises"

    Tony Abbott will be looking for a verdict on what he did in his first term rather than what he promised in the campaign before it, writes Lyndal Curtis.

    Abc Net
  4. 4
    ato.gov.au

    "Schedule 5 - Portability of disability support pension"

    Ato Gov

  5. 5
    servicesaustralia.gov.au

    "Travel outside Australia rules for Disability Support Pension"

    Servicesaustralia Gov

  6. 6
    "The Guardian - Bias and Credibility"

    "The Guardian - Bias and Credibility"

    LEFT-CENTER BIAS These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words

    Media Bias/Fact Check
  7. 7
    "Budget 2014: Joe Hockey delivers deep pain for little gain"

    "Budget 2014: Joe Hockey delivers deep pain for little gain"

    Big cuts for unemployed and sick people, students, pensioners and families – but few measures that will quickly 'repair' the budget

    the Guardian
  8. 8
    "Continuity or Change? Disability Policy and the Rudd Government"

    "Continuity or Change? Disability Policy and the Rudd Government"

    This article reports on shifts and continuities in policy relating to disabled people and the administrative apparatus of federal disability policy under the Rudd government (2007–10). It begins with a brief historical overview of disability policy

    Academia

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。