部分属实

评分: 5.0/10

Coalition
C0512

声明内容

“花费了2460万澳元开展广告宣传活动,推销一项贸易协议的好处(该协议的内容是秘密的)。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

24602460 2460 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 的de de 广告宣传guǎng gào xuān chuán guǎng gào xuān chuán 活动huó dòng huó dòng 于yú yú 20152015 2015 年nián nián 88 8 月yuè yuè 宣布xuān bù xuān bù ,, , 旨在zhǐ zài zhǐ zài 促进cù jìn cù jìn 与yǔ yǔ ChinaChina China 、、 、 KoreaKorea Korea 和hé hé JapanJapan Japan 的de de 自由zì yóu zì yóu 贸易协定mào yì xié dìng mào yì xié dìng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The $24.6 million advertising campaign was announced in August 2015 to promote free trade agreements with China, Korea, and Japan [1].
该gāi gāi 活动huó dòng huó dòng 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 约yuē yuē 200200 200 场chǎng chǎng 路演lù yǎn lù yǎn ,, , 并bìng bìng 配有pèi yǒu pèi yǒu 电视diàn shì diàn shì 、、 、 平面广告píng miàn guǎng gào píng miàn guǎng gào 和hé hé 社交shè jiāo shè jiāo 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 宣传xuān chuán xuān chuán [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The campaign included approximately 200 road shows backed by television, print advertisements, and social media [1].
ChinaChina China -- - AustraliaAustralia Australia FreeFree Free TradeTrade Trade AgreementAgreement Agreement (( ( ChAFTAChAFTA ChAFTA )) ) 于yú yú 20152015 2015 年nián nián 66 6 月yuè yuè 1515 15 日rì rì 在zài zài CanberraCanberra Canberra 签署qiān shǔ qiān shǔ ,, , 并于bìng yú bìng yú 20152015 2015 年nián nián 66 6 月yuè yuè 1717 17 日rì rì 提交tí jiāo tí jiāo 议会yì huì yì huì [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
The China-Australia Free Trade Agreement (ChAFTA) had been signed on 15 June 2015 in Canberra and tabled in Parliament on 17 June 2015 [2][3].
该gāi gāi 条约tiáo yuē tiáo yuē 在zài zài 完成wán chéng wán chéng 议会yì huì yì huì 程序chéng xù chéng xù 后于hòu yú hòu yú 20152015 2015 年nián nián 1212 12 月yuè yuè 2020 20 日rì rì 生效shēng xiào shēng xiào [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
The treaty entered into force on 20 December 2015 after completing parliamentary processes [3].
关于guān yú guān yú 协议xié yì xié yì 内容nèi róng nèi róng "" " 秘密mì mì mì mì "" " 的de de 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng 。。 。
The claim that the content was "secret" is misleading.
虽然suī rán suī rán 贸易谈判mào yì tán pàn mào yì tán pàn 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng (( ( 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ )) ) ,, , 但dàn dàn ChAFTAChAFTA ChAFTA 文本wén běn wén běn 于yú yú 20152015 2015 年nián nián 66 6 月yuè yuè 1717 17 日rì rì 提交tí jiāo tí jiāo 议会yì huì yì huì 后hòu hòu 已yǐ yǐ 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi —— — —— — 比bǐ bǐ 广告guǎng gào guǎng gào 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 早zǎo zǎo 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 月yuè yuè [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
While trade negotiations are typically conducted confidentially (standard practice for all governments), the ChAFTA text was publicly available after being tabled in Parliament on 17 June 2015 - two months before the advertising announcement [2].
JointJoint Joint StandingStanding Standing CommitteeCommittee Committee onon on TreatiesTreaties Treaties 举行jǔ xíng jǔ xíng 了le le 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 听证会tīng zhèng huì tīng zhèng huì 并bìng bìng 发布fā bù fā bù 了le le ReportReport Report 154154 154 审议shěn yì shěn yì 该gāi gāi 协议xié yì xié yì [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The Joint Standing Committee on Treaties conducted public hearings and published Report 154 reviewing the agreement [2].

缺失背景

该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 信息xìn xī xìn xī :: :
The claim omits several critical pieces of context: 1. **The advertising covered THREE trade agreements**, not just ChAFTA.
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 广告宣传guǎng gào xuān chuán guǎng gào xuān chuán 涵盖hán gài hán gài 了le le 三项sān xiàng sān xiàng 贸易mào yì mào yì 协议xié yì xié yì ** * ** * ,, , 而ér ér 不仅仅bù jǐn jǐn bù jǐn jǐn 是shì shì ChAFTAChAFTA ChAFTA 。。 。
The $24.6 million promoted the China FTA, Korea-Australia FTA (KAFTA), and Japan-Australia Economic Partnership Agreement (JAEPA) simultaneously [1]. 2. **The campaign was responsive to union opposition**.
24602460 2460 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 同时tóng shí tóng shí 推广tuī guǎng tuī guǎng 了le le ChinaChina China FTAFTA FTA 、、 、 KoreaKorea Korea -- - AustraliaAustralia Australia FTAFTA FTA (( ( KAFTAKAFTA KAFTA )) ) 和hé hé JapanJapan Japan -- - AustraliaAustralia Australia EconomicEconomic Economic PartnershipPartnership Partnership AgreementAgreement Agreement (( ( JAEPAJAEPA JAEPA )) ) [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
Trade Minister Andrew Robb stated the advertising was designed to counter a union "scare campaign" that he described as "xenophobic, misplaced, misleading, lying" [1].
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 该gāi gāi 活动huó dòng huó dòng 是shì shì 对duì duì 工会gōng huì gōng huì 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 的de de 回应huí yìng huí yìng ** * ** * 。。 。
The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU) was actively campaigning against ChAFTA, claiming it would harm Australian workers. 3. **Parliamentary timing**: Independent Senator Nick Xenophon criticized the timing, noting the advertising was scheduled to begin around October 2015, potentially before Parliament gave final approval [1].
TradeTrade Trade MinisterMinister Minister AndrewAndrew Andrew RobbRobb Robb 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì ,, , 广告宣传guǎng gào xuān chuán guǎng gào xuān chuán 旨在zhǐ zài zhǐ zài 反击fǎn jī fǎn jī 工会gōng huì gōng huì 他tā tā 称之为chēng zhī wèi chēng zhī wèi "" " 排外pái wài pái wài 的de de 、、 、 错位cuò wèi cuò wèi 的de de 、、 、 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng 的de de 、、 、 撒谎sā huǎng sā huǎng 的de de "" " "" " 恐吓kǒng hè kǒng hè 运动yùn dòng yùn dòng "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
However, the agreement had already been tabled and was undergoing standard parliamentary scrutiny. 4. **Crossbench concerns**: Senator Glenn Lazarus expressed concerns about the level of detail being provided about the agreement [1], but this does not mean the text was "secret" - it was publicly tabled and available.
ConstructionConstruction Construction ,, , ForestryForestry Forestry ,, , MiningMining Mining andand and EnergyEnergy Energy UnionUnion Union (( ( CFMEUCFMEU CFMEU )) ) 正在zhèng zài zhèng zài 积极jī jí jī jí 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì ChAFTAChAFTA ChAFTA ,, , 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 它tā tā 将jiāng jiāng 损害sǔn hài sǔn hài AustralianAustralian Australian 工人gōng rén gōng rén 。。 。
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 议会yì huì yì huì 时间shí jiān shí jiān ** * ** * :: : IndependentIndependent Independent SenatorSenator Senator NickNick Nick XenophonXenophon Xenophon 批评pī píng pī píng 了le le 这zhè zhè 一时间yī shí jiān yī shí jiān 安排ān pái ān pái ,, , 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū 广告guǎng gào guǎng gào 计划jì huà jì huà 于yú yú 20152015 2015 年nián nián 1010 10 月yuè yuè 左右zuǒ yòu zuǒ yòu 开始kāi shǐ kāi shǐ ,, , 可能kě néng kě néng 在zài zài 议会yì huì yì huì 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn 之前zhī qián zhī qián [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 该gāi gāi 协议xié yì xié yì 已经yǐ jīng yǐ jīng 提交tí jiāo tí jiāo 并bìng bìng 正在zhèng zài zhèng zài 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 议会yì huì yì huì 审议shěn yì shěn yì 。。 。
44 4 .. . ** * ** * 跨kuà kuà 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 担忧dān yōu dān yōu ** * ** * :: : SenatorSenator Senator GlennGlenn Glenn LazarusLazarus Lazarus 对duì duì 协议xié yì xié yì 细节xì jié xì jié 披露pī lù pī lù 程度chéng dù chéng dù 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 担忧dān yōu dān yōu [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] ,, , 但dàn dàn 这zhè zhè 并bìng bìng 不bù bù 意味着yì wèi zhe yì wèi zhe 文本wén běn wén běn 是shì shì "" " 秘密mì mì mì mì "" " 的de de —— — —— — 它tā tā 已yǐ yǐ 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 提交tí jiāo tí jiāo 并bìng bìng 可供kě gōng kě gōng 查阅chá yuè chá yuè 。。 。

来源可信度评估

原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán (( ( 9News9News 9News // / AAPAAP AAP )) ) 是shì shì 一家yī jiā yī jiā 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 商业shāng yè shāng yè 新闻媒体xīn wén méi tǐ xīn wén méi tǐ 。。 。
The original source (9News/AAP) is a mainstream commercial news outlet.
报道bào dào bào dào 客观kè guān kè guān 中立zhōng lì zhōng lì ,, , 呈现chéng xiàn chéng xiàn 了le le 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 、、 、 LaborLabor Labor 的de de 顾虑gù lǜ gù lǜ 和hé hé 跨kuà kuà 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 批评pī píng pī píng 在内zài nèi zài nèi 的de de 多方duō fāng duō fāng 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The reporting is factual and neutral, presenting multiple perspectives including the government's justification, Labor's concerns, and crossbench criticism [1].
来源lái yuán lái yuán 可信kě xìn kě xìn ,, , 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 明显míng xiǎn míng xiǎn 的de de 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng 。。 。
The source is credible and not overtly partisan.
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做过zuò guò zuò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng ?? ?
**Did Labor do something similar?** Yes, Labor governments have engaged in comparable taxpayer-funded advertising campaigns: - **Gonski school funding**: The Rudd/Gillard Labor governments spent A$20 million on advertising to promote Gonski school funding changes [4]. - **Carbon tax**: The same Labor governments spent A$70 million on advertising campaigns for the carbon tax [4]. - **TPP negotiations**: Australia joined the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations in 2011 under the Gillard Government [5].
** * ** *
Like ChAFTA, the TPP negotiations were conducted with confidentiality provisions standard to trade negotiations.
是shì shì 的de de ,, , LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 也yě yě 曾céng céng 开展kāi zhǎn kāi zhǎn 过guò guò 可比kě bǐ kě bǐ 的de de 纳税人nà shuì rén nà shuì rén 资助zī zhù zī zhù 的de de 广告guǎng gào guǎng gào 活动huó dòng huó dòng :: :
Critics described the TPP as "the most secretive and least transparent trade negotiations in history" [5]. **Historical context**: Government advertising to promote major policy initiatives is standard practice across both major parties.
-- - ** * ** * GonskiGonski Gonski 学校xué xiào xué xiào 资助zī zhù zī zhù ** * ** * :: : RuddRudd Rudd // / GillardGillard Gillard LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 花费huā fèi huā fèi 20002000 2000 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 宣传xuān chuán xuān chuán GonskiGonski Gonski 学校xué xiào xué xiào 资助zī zhù zī zhù 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
The Howard Coalition government spent A$100 million on WorkChoices and GST advertising campaigns [4].
-- - ** * ** * 碳税tàn shuì tàn shuì ** * ** * :: : 同一tóng yī tóng yī LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 花费huā fèi huā fèi 70007000 7000 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 开展kāi zhǎn kāi zhǎn 碳税tàn shuì tàn shuì 广告guǎng gào guǎng gào 活动huó dòng huó dòng [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
-- - ** * ** * TPPTPP TPP 谈判tán pàn tán pàn ** * ** * :: : AustraliaAustralia Australia 于yú yú 20112011 2011 年nián nián 在zài zài GillardGillard Gillard 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 期间qī jiān qī jiān 加入jiā rù jiā rù TransTrans Trans -- - PacificPacific Pacific PartnershipPartnership Partnership 谈判tán pàn tán pàn [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
与yǔ yǔ ChAFTAChAFTA ChAFTA 一样yī yàng yī yàng ,, , TPPTPP TPP 谈判tán pàn tán pàn 按照àn zhào àn zhào 贸易谈判mào yì tán pàn mào yì tán pàn 的de de 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 并bìng bìng 附有fù yǒu fù yǒu 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì 条款tiáo kuǎn tiáo kuǎn 。。 。
批评者pī píng zhě pī píng zhě 称chēng chēng TPPTPP TPP 是shì shì "" " 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ 上shàng shàng 最zuì zuì 秘密mì mì mì mì 、、 、 最zuì zuì 不bù bù 透明tòu míng tòu míng 的de de 贸易谈判mào yì tán pàn mào yì tán pàn "" " [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 历史背景lì shǐ bèi jǐng lì shǐ bèi jǐng ** * ** * :: : 两大liǎng dà liǎng dà 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 都dōu dōu 将jiāng jiāng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 广告guǎng gào guǎng gào 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 推广tuī guǎng tuī guǎng 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 举措jǔ cuò jǔ cuò 的de de 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ 。。 。
HowardHoward Howard CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 和hé hé GSTGST GST 广告guǎng gào guǎng gào 活动huó dòng huó dòng 上shàng shàng 花费huā fèi huā fèi 11 1 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

虽然suī rán suī rán 像xiàng xiàng SenatorSenator Senator XenophonXenophon Xenophon 这样zhè yàng zhè yàng 的de de 批评者pī píng zhě pī píng zhě 将jiāng jiāng 广告guǎng gào guǎng gào 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为wèi wèi "" " 极度jí dù jí dù 不负责任bù fù zé rèn bù fù zé rèn "" " 和hé hé "" " 懦弱nuò ruò nuò ruò "" " ,, , 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi 在zài zài 议会yì huì yì huì 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn 前qián qián 推广tuī guǎng tuī guǎng 协议xié yì xié yì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] ,, , 但dàn dàn 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 坚称jiān chēng jiān chēng 这是zhè shì zhè shì 反击fǎn jī fǎn jī 工会gōng huì gōng huì 运动yùn dòng yùn dòng 传播chuán bō chuán bō 错误信息cuò wù xìn xī cuò wù xìn xī 的de de 必要bì yào bì yào 举措jǔ cuò jǔ cuò 。。 。
While critics like Senator Xenophon characterized the advertising as "grossly irresponsible" and "cowardly" for promoting a deal before final parliamentary approval [1], the government maintained it was necessary to counter misinformation from union campaigns.
TradeTrade Trade MinisterMinister Minister RobbRobb Robb 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 工会gōng huì gōng huì 运动yùn dòng yùn dòng "" " 在zài zài 玩wán wán 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 游戏yóu xì yóu xì "" " ,, , 试图shì tú shì tú "" " 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ 在zài zài AustraliaAustralia Australia 创造chuàng zào chuàng zào 就业jiù yè jiù yè "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
Trade Minister Robb argued the union movement was "playing a political game" and trying to "stop jobs being created in Australia" [1].
LaborLabor Labor 的de de 贸易mào yì mào yì 发言人fā yán rén fā yán rén PennyPenny Penny WongWong Wong 就jiù jiù AustralianAustralian Australian 就业jiù yè jiù yè 保障bǎo zhàng bǎo zhàng 提出tí chū tí chū 了le le 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 的de de 质疑zhì yí zhì yí [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] ,, , 但dàn dàn 这zhè zhè 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 的de de 是shì shì 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 反对党fǎn duì dǎng fǎn duì dǎng 监督jiān dū jiān dū ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 程序chéng xù chéng xù 中zhōng zhōng 的de de 独特dú tè dú tè 缺陷quē xiàn quē xiàn 。。 。
Labor's trade spokeswoman Penny Wong raised legitimate questions about safeguards for Australian jobs [1], but this reflects standard opposition scrutiny rather than a unique flaw in the process. **Comparative analysis**: The $24.6 million for three trade agreements is modest compared to: - Labor's $70 million carbon tax campaign [4] - Labor's $20 million Gonski campaign [4] - Howard's $100 million WorkChoices/GST campaigns [4] The claim's characterization of the deal as "secret" is inaccurate - ChAFTA followed standard treaty processes with public tabling, committee review, and parliamentary approval.
** * ** * 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào 分析fēn xī fēn xī ** * ** * :: : 24602460 2460 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 用于yòng yú yòng yú 三项sān xiàng sān xiàng 贸易mào yì mào yì 协议xié yì xié yì ,, , 与yǔ yǔ 以下yǐ xià yǐ xià 相比xiāng bǐ xiāng bǐ 算是suàn shì suàn shì 适度shì dù shì dù 的de de :: :
All governments conduct trade negotiations confidentially, including Labor with the TPP [5].
-- - LaborLabor Labor 的de de 70007000 7000 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 碳税tàn shuì tàn shuì 活动huó dòng huó dòng [[ [ 44 4 ]] ]
-- - LaborLabor Labor 的de de 20002000 2000 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán GonskiGonski Gonski 活动huó dòng huó dòng [[ [ 44 4 ]] ]
-- - HowardHoward Howard 的de de 11 1 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé // / GSTGST GST 活动huó dòng huó dòng [[ [ 44 4 ]] ]
该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 将jiāng jiāng 协议xié yì xié yì 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为wèi wèi "" " 秘密mì mì mì mì "" " 是shì shì 不bù bù 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de —— — —— — ChAFTAChAFTA ChAFTA 遵循zūn xún zūn xún 了le le 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 条约tiáo yuē tiáo yuē 程序chéng xù chéng xù ,, , 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 提交tí jiāo tí jiāo 、、 、 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 审查shěn chá shěn chá 和hé hé 议会yì huì yì huì 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn 。。 。
所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 都dōu dōu 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 贸易谈判mào yì tán pàn mào yì tán pàn ,, , 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò LaborLabor Labor 的de de TPPTPP TPP [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。

部分属实

5.0

/ 10

24602460 2460 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 的de de 广告guǎng gào guǎng gào 支出zhī chū zhī chū 数据shù jù shù jù 是shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de ,, , 活动huó dòng huó dòng 确实què shí què shí 推广tuī guǎng tuī guǎng 了le le 贸易mào yì mào yì 协议xié yì xié yì 。。 。
The $24.6 million advertising figure is accurate, and the campaign did promote trade deals.
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 包含bāo hán bāo hán 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 歪曲wāi qū wāi qū :: :
However, the claim contains significant mischaracterizations: 1.
11 1 .. . "" " 秘密mì mì mì mì "" " 的de de 描述miáo shù miáo shù 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng —— — —— — ChAFTAChAFTA ChAFTA 于yú yú 20152015 2015 年nián nián 66 6 月yuè yuè 1717 17 日rì rì 提交tí jiāo tí jiāo 议会yì huì yì huì ,, , 并bìng bìng 经过jīng guò jīng guò 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 听证会tīng zhèng huì tīng zhèng huì 和hé hé 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 议会yì huì yì huì 审查shěn chá shěn chá [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
The "secret" description is misleading - ChAFTA was tabled in Parliament on 17 June 2015, with public committee hearings and standard parliamentary scrutiny [2][3]. 2.
22 2 .. . 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le 广告宣传guǎng gào xuān chuán guǎng gào xuān chuán 涵盖hán gài hán gài 三项sān xiàng sān xiàng 协议xié yì xié yì (( ( ChinaChina China 、、 、 KoreaKorea Korea 、、 、 JapanJapan Japan )) ) ,, , 而ér ér 不仅仅bù jǐn jǐn bù jǐn jǐn 是shì shì ChAFTAChAFTA ChAFTA [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The claim omits that the advertising covered THREE agreements (China, Korea, Japan), not just ChAFTA [1]. 3.
33 3 .. . 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 所suǒ suǒ 回应huí yìng huí yìng 的de de 工会gōng huì gōng huì 恐吓kǒng hè kǒng hè 运动yùn dòng yùn dòng 的de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The claim omits context about the union scare campaign the government was responding to [1]. 4.
44 4 .. . 这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 暗示àn shì àn shì 了le le 异常yì cháng yì cháng 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi ,, , 而ér ér 纳税人nà shuì rén nà shuì rén 资助zī zhù zī zhù 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 广告guǎng gào guǎng gào 是shì shì 两大liǎng dà liǎng dà 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 的de de 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
The framing suggests unusual behavior, when taxpayer-funded policy advertising is standard across both major parties [4].

📚 来源与引用 (5)

  1. 1
    9news.com.au

    9news.com.au

    The federal government will counter a union fight against the China free trade deal with a multi-million do...

    9News
  2. 2
    PDF

    Report 154

    Aph Gov • PDF Document
  3. 3
    dfat.gov.au

    dfat.gov.au

    Dfat Gov

  4. 4
    theconversation.com

    theconversation.com

    Both the Liberals and Labor complain about government advertising when they’re in the opposition. So why hasn’t anyone tried to better regulate the system?

    The Conversation
  5. 5
    getup.org.au

    getup.org.au

    Getup Org

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。