属实

评分: 8.0/10

Coalition
C0375

声明内容

“禁止原住民法律服务处在关于放宽种族仇恨言论法律的法律调查中提供证据。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis
分析时间: 30 Jan 2026

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

核心hé xīn hé xīn 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 在zài zài ** * ** * 事实shì shí shì shí 层面céng miàn céng miàn 是shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de ** * ** * 。。 。
The core claim is **factually accurate**.
原住民yuán zhù mín yuán zhù mín 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 服务处fú wù chù fú wù chù (( ( 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 为wèi wèi 新南威尔士州xīn nán wēi ěr shì zhōu xīn nán wēi ěr shì zhōu // / 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 首都shǒu dū shǒu dū 领地lǐng dì lǐng dì 原住民yuán zhù mín yuán zhù mín 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 服务处fú wù chù fú wù chù )) ) 确实què shí què shí 在zài zài 20172017 2017 年nián nián 33 3 月yuè yuè 被bèi bèi 拒绝jù jué jù jué 向xiàng xiàng 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 调查diào chá diào chá 提供tí gōng tí gōng 证人zhèng rén zhèng rén 证词zhèng cí zhèng cí 的de de 机会jī huì jī huì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The Aboriginal Legal Service (specifically the NSW/ACT Aboriginal Legal Service) was indeed denied the opportunity to provide evidence to a Senate inquiry in March 2017 [1].
相关xiāng guān xiāng guān 调查diào chá diào chá 是shì shì 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 听证会tīng zhèng huì tīng zhèng huì ,, , 审查shěn chá shěn chá 拟议nǐ yì nǐ yì 的de de 《《 《 种族歧视zhǒng zú qí shì zhǒng zú qí shì 法fǎ fǎ 》》 》 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi ,, , 特别tè bié tè bié 关注guān zhù guān zhù "" " 放宽fàng kuān fàng kuān "" " 第dì dì 18C18C 18C 条tiáo tiáo 种族zhǒng zú zhǒng zú 诽谤fěi bàng fěi bàng 条款tiáo kuǎn tiáo kuǎn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The inquiry in question was a Senate committee hearing examining proposed changes to the Racial Discrimination Act, specifically focusing on "loosening" section 18C racial vilification provisions [1].
该gāi gāi 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 是shì shì 在zài zài 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 努力nǔ lì nǔ lì 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 种族zhǒng zú zhǒng zú 诽谤fěi bàng fěi bàng 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 的de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 下xià xià 审议shěn yì shěn yì 的de de 。。 。
The legislation was being considered in the context of the Coalition government's efforts to reform racial vilification laws.
20172017 2017 年nián nián 33 3 月yuè yuè 2424 24 日rì rì 星期五xīng qī wǔ xīng qī wǔ ,, , 自由党zì yóu dǎng zì yóu dǎng 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán 伊恩yī ēn yī ēn ·· · 麦克唐纳mài kè táng nà mài kè táng nà 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 调查diào chá diào chá 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 主席zhǔ xí zhǔ xí ,, , 拒绝jù jué jù jué 允许yǔn xǔ yǔn xǔ 原住民yuán zhù mín yuán zhù mín 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 服务处fú wù chù fú wù chù 提供tí gōng tí gōng 证人zhèng rén zhèng rén 证词zhèng cí zhèng cí [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
On Friday, March 24, 2017, Liberal Senator Ian Macdonald, who was chairing the inquiry committee, refused to allow the Aboriginal Legal Service to provide witness testimony [1].
这一zhè yī zhè yī 决定jué dìng jué dìng 发生fā shēng fā shēng 在zài zài 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 为wèi wèi 时shí shí 五天wǔ tiān wǔ tiān 的de de 调查diào chá diào chá 审议shěn yì shěn yì 证人zhèng rén zhèng rén 名单míng dān míng dān 时shí shí 。。 。
This decision occurred when the committee was deliberating over its witness list for the five-day inquiry.
该gāi gāi 拒绝jù jué jù jué 决定jué dìng jué dìng 由yóu yóu 麦克唐纳mài kè táng nà mài kè táng nà 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán 本人běn rén běn rén 向xiàng xiàng 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 发表fā biǎo fā biǎo 的de de 声明shēng míng shēng míng 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí 。。 。
The denial was confirmed directly by Senator Macdonald's own statement to the committee.
当dāng dāng 被bèi bèi 质疑zhì yí zhì yí 排除pái chú pái chú 决定jué dìng jué dìng 时shí shí ,, , 麦克唐纳mài kè táng nà mài kè táng nà 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán 通过tōng guò tōng guò 声明shēng míng shēng míng 为wèi wèi 这zhè zhè 一yī yī 决定jué dìng jué dìng 辩护biàn hù biàn hù :: : "" " 一旦yí dàn yí dàn 你nǐ nǐ 开始kāi shǐ kāi shǐ 让ràng ràng 任何rèn hé rèn hé 类型lèi xíng lèi xíng 的de de 某个mǒu gè mǒu gè 群体qún tǐ qún tǐ —— — —— — 在zài zài 这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 下xià xià 是shì shì 一个yí gè yí gè 原住民yuán zhù mín yuán zhù mín 群体qún tǐ qún tǐ —— — —— — 持有chí yǒu chí yǒu 特定tè dìng tè dìng 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn ,, , 你nǐ nǐ 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 要yào yào 召集zhào jí zhào jí 同一tóng yī tóng yī 群体qún tǐ qún tǐ 的de de 其他qí tā qí tā 成员chéng yuán chéng yuán ,, , 他们tā men tā men 可能kě néng kě néng 持有chí yǒu chí yǒu 不同bù tóng bù tóng 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn ?? ?
When challenged on the exclusion, Senator Macdonald justified the decision by stating: "once you start having one group of any type, in this case an Indigenous group, who have a particular view, do you call other members of that same group that might have a different view?
我wǒ wǒ 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 正是zhèng shì zhèng shì 出于chū yú chū yú 这个zhè ge zhè ge 原因yuán yīn yuán yīn ,, , 我们wǒ men wǒ men 决定jué dìng jué dìng 将jiāng jiāng 名单míng dān míng dān 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 为wèi wèi 我们wǒ men wǒ men 已有yǐ yǒu yǐ yǒu 的de de (( ( 证人zhèng rén zhèng rén 名单míng dān míng dān 上shàng shàng 的de de )) ) 那些nà xiē nà xiē "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
I think it was for that reason we decided to restrict it to the ones we have (on the witness list)" [1].

缺失背景

虽然suī rán suī rán 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 在zài zài 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng 是shì shì 正确zhèng què zhèng què 的de de ,, , 但dàn dàn 省略shěng lüè shěng lüè 了le le 关于guān yú guān yú 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 和hé hé 程序chéng xù chéng xù 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 的de de 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 信息xìn xī xìn xī :: :
The claim, while factually correct, omits important context about the reasoning and procedural context: **Committee's stated rationale:** Senator Macdonald's justification centered on a procedural argument about consistency rather than explicit exclusion based on opposition.
** * ** * 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 陈述chén shù chén shù 的de de 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu :: : ** * ** * 麦克唐纳mài kè táng nà mài kè táng nà 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán 的de de 辩护biàn hù biàn hù 集中jí zhōng jí zhōng 在zài zài 程序chéng xù chéng xù 一致性yí zhì xìng yí zhì xìng 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 基于jī yú jī yú 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 意见yì jiàn yì jiàn 的de de 明确míng què míng què 排除pái chú pái chú 。。 。
He argued that if the committee allowed one Indigenous organization to provide evidence, they would be obligated to allow alternative Indigenous voices with different perspectives [1].
他tā tā 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi ,, , 如果rú guǒ rú guǒ 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 允许yǔn xǔ yǔn xǔ 一个yí gè yí gè 原住民yuán zhù mín yuán zhù mín 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 提供tí gōng tí gōng 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù ,, , 他们tā men tā men 将jiāng jiāng 有yǒu yǒu 义务yì wù yì wù 允许yǔn xǔ yǔn xǔ 持有chí yǒu chí yǒu 不同bù tóng bù tóng 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn 的de de 其他qí tā qí tā 原住民yuán zhù mín yuán zhù mín 声音shēng yīn shēng yīn 参与cān yù cān yù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
Independent Senator Derryn Hinch supported this position, arguing that "Everybody in Australia has had a chance to put their view - all the views are known" and that adding additional witnesses was unnecessary since the issues had been "widely canvassed in a previous inquiry" [1]. **Political context:** The inquiry occurred during the Coalition government's push to reform racial vilification laws following the death of cartoonist Bill Leak in March 2017.
独立dú lì dú lì 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán 德里dé lǐ dé lǐ 恩ēn ēn ·· · 欣奇xīn qí xīn qí 支持zhī chí zhī chí 这一zhè yī zhè yī 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng ,, , 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi "" " 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 每个měi gè měi gè 人rén rén 都dōu dōu 有yǒu yǒu 机会jī huì jī huì 表达biǎo dá biǎo dá 自己zì jǐ zì jǐ 的de de 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn —— — —— — 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn 都dōu dōu 是shì shì 已知yǐ zhī yǐ zhī 的de de "" " ,, , 增加zēng jiā zēng jiā 额外é wài é wài 证人zhèng rén zhèng rén 是shì shì 不必要bù bì yào bù bì yào 的de de ,, , 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 问题wèn tí wèn tí 在zài zài "" " 之前zhī qián zhī qián 的de de 调查diào chá diào chá 中zhōng zhōng 已经yǐ jīng yǐ jīng 被bèi bèi 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
Senator Macdonald opened the hearing by paying tribute to Leak and noting his "passion for this particular issue and the legislation which has followed" [1].
** * ** * 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng :: : ** * ** * 该gāi gāi 调查diào chá diào chá 发生fā shēng fā shēng 在zài zài 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 推动tuī dòng tuī dòng 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 种族zhǒng zú zhǒng zú 诽谤fěi bàng fěi bàng 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 期间qī jiān qī jiān ,, , 此前cǐ qián cǐ qián 漫画家màn huà jiā màn huà jiā 比尔bǐ ěr bǐ ěr ·· · 利克于lì kè yú lì kè yú 20172017 2017 年nián nián 33 3 月yuè yuè 去世qù shì qù shì 。。 。
This suggests the reform was partly motivated by a specific controversial case. **Legislative background:** The specific legislation being considered was the government's proposed changes to the Racial Discrimination Act's section 18C provisions.
麦克唐纳mài kè táng nà mài kè táng nà 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán 在zài zài 听证会tīng zhèng huì tīng zhèng huì 开始kāi shǐ kāi shǐ 时向shí xiàng shí xiàng 利克lì kè lì kè 致敬zhì jìng zhì jìng ,, , 并bìng bìng 提到tí dào tí dào 他tā tā "" " 对duì duì 这项zhè xiàng zhè xiàng 特定tè dìng tè dìng 问题wèn tí wèn tí 和hé hé 后续hòu xù hòu xù 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 的de de 热情rè qíng rè qíng "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
These reforms had been a point of contention between the government and Indigenous groups, as well as civil liberties advocates and racial justice advocates [1]. **Labor and Greens support:** Notably, the exclusion was opposed by both Labor senators (particularly Pat Dodson and Murray Watt) and the Greens, who had specifically requested the Aboriginal Legal Service be added as a witness [1].
这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 部分bù fèn bù fèn 是shì shì 由yóu yóu 一个yí gè yí gè 有yǒu yǒu 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì 的de de 特定tè dìng tè dìng 案例àn lì àn lì 推动tuī dòng tuī dòng 的de de 。。 。
This indicates disagreement over the witness list was partisan.
** * ** * 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng :: : ** * ** * 正在zhèng zài zhèng zài 审议shěn yì shěn yì 的de de 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 是shì shì 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 拟议nǐ yì nǐ yì 对duì duì 《《 《 种族歧视zhǒng zú qí shì zhǒng zú qí shì 法fǎ fǎ 》》 》 第dì dì 18C18C 18C 条tiáo tiáo 条款tiáo kuǎn tiáo kuǎn 的de de 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi 。。 。
这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 一直yì zhí yì zhí 是shì shì 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 与yǔ yǔ 原住民yuán zhù mín yuán zhù mín 群体qún tǐ qún tǐ 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 公民自由gōng mín zì yóu gōng mín zì yóu 倡导者chàng dǎo zhě chàng dǎo zhě 和hé hé 种族zhǒng zú zhǒng zú 正义zhèng yì zhèng yì 倡导者chàng dǎo zhě chàng dǎo zhě 之间zhī jiān zhī jiān 的de de 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì 焦点jiāo diǎn jiāo diǎn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 和hé hé 绿党lǜ dǎng lǜ dǎng 的de de 支持zhī chí zhī chí :: : ** * ** * 值得注意zhí de zhù yì zhí de zhù yì 的de de 是shì shì ,, , 排除pái chú pái chú 决定jué dìng jué dìng 遭到zāo dào zāo dào 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán (( ( 特别tè bié tè bié 是shì shì 帕特pà tè pà tè ·· · 多森duō sēn duō sēn 和hé hé 默里mò lǐ mò lǐ ·· · 瓦特wǎ tè wǎ tè )) ) 和hé hé 绿党lǜ dǎng lǜ dǎng 的de de 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì ,, , 他们tā men tā men 曾céng céng 特别tè bié tè bié 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 将jiāng jiāng 原住民yuán zhù mín yuán zhù mín 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 服务处fú wù chù fú wù chù 添加tiān jiā tiān jiā 为wèi wèi 证人zhèng rén zhèng rén [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 对duì duì 证人zhèng rén zhèng rén 名单míng dān míng dān 的de de 分歧fēn qí fēn qí 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 性质xìng zhì xìng zhì 。。 。

来源可信度评估

原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán 是shì shì ** * ** * SBSSBS SBS NITVNITV NITV ** * ** * (( ( 特别tè bié tè bié 广播guǎng bō guǎng bō 服务公司fú wù gōng sī fú wù gōng sī 的de de 国家guó jiā guó jiā 原住民yuán zhù mín yuán zhù mín 电视台diàn shì tái diàn shì tái )) ) ,, , 这是zhè shì zhè shì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 一家yī jiā yī jiā 专注zhuān zhù zhuān zhù 于yú yú 原住民yuán zhù mín yuán zhù mín 事务shì wù shì wù 的de de 公共广播gōng gòng guǎng bō gōng gòng guǎng bō 公司gōng sī gōng sī 。。 。
The original source is **SBS NITV** (Special Broadcasting Service's National Indigenous Television), which is an Australian public broadcaster specializing in Indigenous affairs.
SBSSBS SBS 是shì shì 一家yī jiā yī jiā 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 的de de 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 资助zī zhù zī zhù 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī ,, , 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 成熟chéng shú chéng shú 的de de 编辑biān jí biān jí 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
SBS is a mainstream, government-funded media organization with established editorial standards [1].
虽然suī rán suī rán NITVNITV NITV 专门zhuān mén zhuān mén 关注guān zhù guān zhù 原住民yuán zhù mín yuán zhù mín 事务shì wù shì wù ,, , 可能kě néng kě néng 自然zì rán zì rán 地dì dì 同情tóng qíng tóng qíng 原住民yuán zhù mín yuán zhù mín 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn ,, , 但dàn dàn 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 本身běn shēn běn shēn 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 程序chéng xù chéng xù ,, , 提供tí gōng tí gōng 了le le 各方gè fāng gè fāng (( ( 自由党zì yóu dǎng zì yóu dǎng 主席zhǔ xí zhǔ xí 、、 、 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng // / 绿党lǜ dǎng lǜ dǎng 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 实际shí jì shí jì 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 决定jué dìng jué dìng )) ) 的de de 陈述chén shù chén shù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
While NITV focuses specifically on Indigenous affairs and may naturally sympathize with Indigenous perspectives, the article itself quotes directly from Senate proceedings, providing the statements from all parties (Liberal Chair, Labor/Greens senators, and the actual committee decision) [1].
报道bào dào bào dào 呈现chéng xiàn chéng xiàn 了le le 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 主席zhǔ xí zhǔ xí (( ( 为wèi wèi 排除pái chú pái chú 决定jué dìng jué dìng 辩护biàn hù biàn hù )) ) 和hé hé 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng // / 绿党lǜ dǎng lǜ dǎng 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán (( ( 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì )) ) 的de de 对立duì lì duì lì 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn 。。 。
The reporting presents opposing viewpoints from both the committee chair (justifying the exclusion) and Labor/Greens senators (opposing it).
文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 的de de 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 强调qiáng diào qiáng diào 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì (( ( "" " 混乱hùn luàn hùn luàn "" " 、、 、 "" " 可耻kě chǐ kě chǐ "" " )) ) ,, , 但dàn dàn 这zhè zhè 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 了le le 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán 在zài zài 调查diào chá diào chá 本身běn shēn běn shēn 中zhōng zhōng 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 的de de 实际shí jì shí jì 措辞cuò cí cuò cí [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The article's framing emphasizes the controversy ("shambles," "disgraceful") but this reflects the actual language used by Labor senators in the inquiry itself [1].
报道bào dào bào dào 与yǔ yǔ 当时dāng shí dāng shí 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 对duì duì 有yǒu yǒu 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì 的de de 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 程序chéng xù chéng xù 的de de 报道bào dào bào dào 一致yí zhì yí zhì 。。 。
The reporting is consistent with contemporaneous mainstream media coverage of contentious Senate committee proceedings. **Source bias consideration:** While SBS NITV may have a perspective sympathetic to Indigenous affairs, the article's central claims (that the exclusion occurred, who made the decision, and what was stated) are verifiable through official Senate records and the direct quotes provided.
** * ** * 来源lái yuán lái yuán 偏见piān jiàn piān jiàn 考虑kǎo lǜ kǎo lǜ :: : ** * ** * 虽然suī rán suī rán SBSSBS SBS NITVNITV NITV 可能kě néng kě néng 对duì duì 原住民yuán zhù mín yuán zhù mín 事务shì wù shì wù 持chí chí 同情tóng qíng tóng qíng 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn ,, , 但dàn dàn 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 的de de 核心hé xīn hé xīn 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng (( ( 排除pái chú pái chú 发生fā shēng fā shēng 、、 、 谁shuí shuí 做出zuò chū zuò chū 决定jué dìng jué dìng 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 陈述chén shù chén shù 内容nèi róng nèi róng )) ) 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ 通过tōng guò tōng guò 官方guān fāng guān fāng 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 记录jì lù jì lù 和hé hé 提供tí gōng tí gōng 的de de 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 引语yǐn yǔ yǐn yǔ 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 核实hé shí hé shí 。。 。
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做过zuò guò zuò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng 或huò huò 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì 了le le 先例xiān lì xiān lì ?? ?
**Did Labor do something similar or establish precedent?** The SBS article itself indicates that Labor senators had called for the Aboriginal Legal Service to be included in the witness list, with Labor Senator Murray Watt explicitly stating he would be "happy for the committee to invite an Indigenous person to argue in favour of the law changes" [1].
** * ** *
This suggests Labor was advocating for broader Indigenous participation rather than restricting it.
SBSSBS SBS 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 本身běn shēn běn shēn 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng ,, , 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán 曾céng céng 呼吁hū yù hū yù 将jiāng jiāng 原住民yuán zhù mín yuán zhù mín 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 服务处fú wù chù fú wù chù 纳入nà rù nà rù 证人zhèng rén zhèng rén 名单míng dān míng dān ,, , 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán 默里mò lǐ mò lǐ ·· · 瓦特wǎ tè wǎ tè 明确míng què míng què 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 他tā tā "" " 很hěn hěn 乐意lè yì lè yì 让ràng ràng 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 邀请yāo qǐng yāo qǐng 一位yī wèi yī wèi 原住民yuán zhù mín yuán zhù mín 来lái lái 论证lùn zhèng lùn zhèng 支持zhī chí zhī chí 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
However, broader context on Labor's track record with Indigenous consultation on legislative inquiries is limited in the available sources.
这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 正在zhèng zài zhèng zài 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 原住民yuán zhù mín yuán zhù mín 参与cān yù cān yù ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 参与cān yù cān yù 。。 。
The Senate's witness selection processes are controlled by the committee chair, so the decision-making authority would have fallen to whichever party controlled the chair at that time. **Key observation:** The exclusion was politically contentious at the time it occurred, with both Labor and the Greens immediately opposing it as inappropriate.
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 关于guān yú guān yú 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 在zài zài 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 调查diào chá diào chá 中zhōng zhōng 与yǔ yǔ 原住民yuán zhù mín yuán zhù mín 协商xié shāng xié shāng 的de de 记录jì lù jì lù ,, , 现有xiàn yǒu xiàn yǒu 资料zī liào zī liào 中zhōng zhōng 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 信息xìn xī xìn xī 有限yǒu xiàn yǒu xiàn 。。 。
This suggests it was not standard practice for Senate inquiries to exclude stakeholder groups entirely from witness proceedings [1].
参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 的de de 证人zhèng rén zhèng rén 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 程序chéng xù chéng xù 由yóu yóu 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 主席zhǔ xí zhǔ xí 控制kòng zhì kòng zhì ,, , 因此yīn cǐ yīn cǐ 决策权jué cè quán jué cè quán 将jiāng jiāng 落luò luò 在zài zài 当时dāng shí dāng shí 控制kòng zhì kòng zhì 主席职位zhǔ xí zhí wèi zhǔ xí zhí wèi 的de de 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 手中shǒu zhōng shǒu zhōng 。。 。
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 观察guān chá guān chá :: : ** * ** * 排除pái chú pái chú 决定jué dìng jué dìng 在zài zài 发生fā shēng fā shēng 时shí shí 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 争议性zhēng yì xìng zhēng yì xìng ,, , 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 和hé hé 绿党lǜ dǎng lǜ dǎng 立即lì jí lì jí 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì ,, , 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 这zhè zhè 是shì shì 不bù bù 适当shì dàng shì dàng 的de de 。。 。
这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 调查diào chá diào chá 完全wán quán wán quán 将jiāng jiāng 利益lì yì lì yì 相关xiāng guān xiāng guān 方fāng fāng 群体qún tǐ qún tǐ 排除pái chú pái chú 在zài zài 证人zhèng rén zhèng rén 程序chéng xù chéng xù 之外zhī wài zhī wài 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

** * ** * 支持zhī chí zhī chí 排除pái chú pái chú 决定jué dìng jué dìng 的de de 论点lùn diǎn lùn diǎn :: : ** * ** *
**Arguments supporting the exclusion:** - Senator Macdonald's procedural consistency argument had some merit: if the committee invited one Indigenous group with a particular perspective, logically they might need to invite others with alternative views to ensure balance [1] - Independent Senator Derryn Hinch argued the issues had already been extensively canvassed in prior inquiries, making additional witnesses unnecessary [1] - The committee may have had legitimate space constraints or time limitations for a five-day inquiry **Arguments against the exclusion:** - The Aboriginal Legal Service had specific expertise relevant to the changes being considered: they handle cases involving offensive language charges against Aboriginal people and could speak to how the law affected Indigenous Australians [1] - The organization's spokesperson raised a substantive point about Aboriginal people being "remanded in custody on charges of offensive language, many of those will be children" [1] - Labor and Greens senators characterized the exclusion as inappropriately silencing Indigenous voices from a debate about laws directly affecting Indigenous communities [1] - The language used by both committee opposition and Labor senators ("shambles," "disgraceful," "excluding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people from this debate") suggests the decision was viewed as procedurally inappropriate by substantial parliamentary opposition [1] **Broader context:** Senate inquiries do have legitimate scope limitations, but excluding an entire class of stakeholders (Indigenous organizations) from providing evidence on legislation specifically affecting that group raises questions about process and representation.
-- - 麦克唐纳mài kè táng nà mài kè táng nà 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán 关于guān yú guān yú 程序chéng xù chéng xù 一致性yí zhì xìng yí zhì xìng 的de de 论点lùn diǎn lùn diǎn 有yǒu yǒu 一定yí dìng yí dìng 道理dào lǐ dào lǐ :: : 如果rú guǒ rú guǒ 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 邀请yāo qǐng yāo qǐng 持chí chí 特定tè dìng tè dìng 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn 的de de 一个yí gè yí gè 原住民yuán zhù mín yuán zhù mín 群体qún tǐ qún tǐ ,, , 从cóng cóng 逻辑luó jí luó jí 上shàng shàng 讲jiǎng jiǎng 他们tā men tā men 可能kě néng kě néng 需要xū yào xū yào 邀请yāo qǐng yāo qǐng 持chí chí 不同bù tóng bù tóng 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn 的de de 其他qí tā qí tā 群体qún tǐ qún tǐ 以yǐ yǐ 确保què bǎo què bǎo 平衡píng héng píng héng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The fact that this decision was immediately controversial and opposed by both major opposition parties and the Greens suggests it fell outside normal parliamentary practice.
-- - 独立dú lì dú lì 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán 德里dé lǐ dé lǐ 恩ēn ēn ·· · 欣奇xīn qí xīn qí 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi ,, , 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 问题wèn tí wèn tí 已经yǐ jīng yǐ jīng 在zài zài 之前zhī qián zhī qián 的de de 调查diào chá diào chá 中zhōng zhōng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn ,, , 增加zēng jiā zēng jiā 额外é wài é wài 证人zhèng rén zhèng rén 是shì shì 不必要bù bì yào bù bì yào 的de de [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The Coalition government was pursuing significant changes to racial vilification laws during this period, motivated in part by perceived restrictions on free speech.
-- - 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 可能kě néng kě néng 对duì duì 为期wéi qī wéi qī 五天wǔ tiān wǔ tiān 的de de 调查diào chá diào chá 有yǒu yǒu 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 的de de 空间kōng jiān kōng jiān 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 或huò huò 时间shí jiān shí jiān 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì
Whether broader Indigenous consultation would have informed better policy is debatable, but their exclusion from the formal inquiry process was procedurally unusual and politically contentious.
** * ** * 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 排除pái chú pái chú 决定jué dìng jué dìng 的de de 论点lùn diǎn lùn diǎn :: : ** * ** *
-- - 原住民yuán zhù mín yuán zhù mín 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 服务处fú wù chù fú wù chù 对duì duì 正在zhèng zài zhèng zài 审议shěn yì shěn yì 的de de 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 特定tè dìng tè dìng 专业知识zhuān yè zhī shí zhuān yè zhī shí :: : 他们tā men tā men 处理chǔ lǐ chǔ lǐ 涉及shè jí shè jí 对duì duì 原住民yuán zhù mín yuán zhù mín offensiveoffensive offensive languagelanguage language 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng 的de de 案件àn jiàn àn jiàn ,, , 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ 说明shuō míng shuō míng 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 如何rú hé rú hé 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 原住民yuán zhù mín yuán zhù mín [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
-- - 该gāi gāi 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 发言人fā yán rén fā yán rén 提出tí chū tí chū 了le le 实质性shí zhì xìng shí zhì xìng 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn ,, , 即jí jí 原住民yuán zhù mín yuán zhù mín "" " 因yīn yīn offensiveoffensive offensive languagelanguage language 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng 被bèi bèi 还hái hái 押yā yā 拘留jū liú jū liú ,, , 其中qí zhōng qí zhōng 许多xǔ duō xǔ duō 是shì shì 儿童ér tóng ér tóng "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
-- - 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 和hé hé 绿党lǜ dǎng lǜ dǎng 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi ,, , 将jiāng jiāng 原住民yuán zhù mín yuán zhù mín 声音shēng yīn shēng yīn 排除pái chú pái chú 在zài zài 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 原住民yuán zhù mín yuán zhù mín 社区shè qū shè qū 的de de 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 辩论biàn lùn biàn lùn 之外zhī wài zhī wài 是shì shì 不bù bù 适当shì dàng shì dàng 的de de [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
-- - 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 反对派fǎn duì pài fǎn duì pài 和hé hé 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 的de de 措辞cuò cí cuò cí (( ( "" " 混乱hùn luàn hùn luàn "" " 、、 、 "" " 可耻kě chǐ kě chǐ "" " 、、 、 "" " 将jiāng jiāng 原住民yuán zhù mín yuán zhù mín 和hé hé 托雷斯tuō léi sī tuō léi sī 海峡hǎi xiá hǎi xiá 岛民dǎo mín dǎo mín 排除pái chú pái chú 在zài zài 这场zhè chǎng zhè chǎng 辩论biàn lùn biàn lùn 之外zhī wài zhī wài "" " )) ) 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng ,, , 实质性shí zhì xìng shí zhì xìng 议会yì huì yì huì 反对派fǎn duì pài fǎn duì pài 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 这一zhè yī zhè yī 决定jué dìng jué dìng 在zài zài 程序chéng xù chéng xù 上shàng shàng 是shì shì 不bù bù 适当shì dàng shì dàng 的de de [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
** * ** * 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng :: : ** * ** * 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 调查diào chá diào chá 确实què shí què shí 有yǒu yǒu 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 的de de 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì ,, , 但dàn dàn 将jiāng jiāng 整个zhěng gè zhěng gè 利益lì yì lì yì 相关xiāng guān xiāng guān 方fāng fāng 类别lèi bié lèi bié (( ( 原住民yuán zhù mín yuán zhù mín 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī )) ) 排除pái chú pái chú 在zài zài 为wèi wèi 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 涉及shè jí shè jí 该gāi gāi 群体qún tǐ qún tǐ 的de de 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 提供tí gōng tí gōng 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 之外zhī wài zhī wài ,, , 引发yǐn fā yǐn fā 了le le 关于guān yú guān yú 程序chéng xù chéng xù 和hé hé 代表性dài biǎo xìng dài biǎo xìng 的de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí 。。 。
这一zhè yī zhè yī 决定jué dìng jué dìng 立即lì jí lì jí 引起争议yǐn qǐ zhēng yì yǐn qǐ zhēng yì 并bìng bìng 遭到zāo dào zāo dào 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 反对党fǎn duì dǎng fǎn duì dǎng 和hé hé 绿党lǜ dǎng lǜ dǎng 的de de 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì ,, , 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 它tā tā 超出chāo chū chāo chū 了le le 正常zhèng cháng zhèng cháng 的de de 议会yì huì yì huì 惯例guàn lì guàn lì 。。 。
联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在此期间zài cǐ qī jiān zài cǐ qī jiān 正在zhèng zài zhèng zài 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 对duì duì 种族zhǒng zú zhǒng zú 诽谤fěi bàng fěi bàng 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi ,, , 部分bù fèn bù fèn 原因yuán yīn yuán yīn 是shì shì 出于chū yú chū yú perceivedperceived perceived 对duì duì 言论自由yán lùn zì yóu yán lùn zì yóu 的de de 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 。。 。
更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 原住民yuán zhù mín yuán zhù mín 协商xié shāng xié shāng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 会huì huì 促成cù chéng cù chéng 更好gèng hǎo gèng hǎo 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 尚有shàng yǒu shàng yǒu 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì ,, , 但dàn dàn 他们tā men tā men 被bèi bèi 排除pái chú pái chú 在zài zài 正式zhèng shì zhèng shì 调查diào chá diào chá 程序chéng xù chéng xù 之外zhī wài zhī wài 在zài zài 程序chéng xù chéng xù 上shàng shàng 是shì shì 不bù bù 寻常xún cháng xún cháng 的de de ,, , 在政治上zài zhèng zhì shàng zài zhèng zhì shàng 是shì shì 有yǒu yǒu 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì 的de de 。。 。

属实

8.0

/ 10

原住民yuán zhù mín yuán zhù mín 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 服务处fú wù chù fú wù chù 确实què shí què shí 在zài zài 20172017 2017 年nián nián 33 3 月yuè yuè 被bèi bèi 禁止jìn zhǐ jìn zhǐ 在zài zài 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 关于guān yú guān yú 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi 《《 《 种族歧视zhǒng zú qí shì zhǒng zú qí shì 法fǎ fǎ 》》 》 的de de 调查diào chá diào chá 中zhōng zhōng 提供tí gōng tí gōng 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 。。 。
The Aboriginal Legal Service was factually barred from giving evidence at the Senate inquiry into changes to the Racial Discrimination Act in March 2017.
这一zhè yī zhè yī 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn 确实què shí què shí 发生fā shēng fā shēng ,, , 由yóu yóu 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 主席zhǔ xí zhǔ xí 自由党zì yóu dǎng zì yóu dǎng 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán 伊恩yī ēn yī ēn ·· · 麦克唐纳mài kè táng nà mài kè táng nà 决定jué dìng jué dìng 。。 。
This occurred and was decided by Liberal Senator Ian Macdonald, the committee chair.
"" " 放宽fàng kuān fàng kuān 种族zhǒng zú zhǒng zú 仇恨chóu hèn chóu hèn 言论yán lùn yán lùn 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ "" " 的de de 措辞cuò cí cuò cí 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 了le le 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi (( ( 批评者pī píng zhě pī píng zhě 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 会huì huì 削弱xuē ruò xuē ruò )) ) 第dì dì 18C18C 18C 条tiáo tiáo 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 的de de 意图yì tú yì tú ,, , 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn "" " 放宽fàng kuān fàng kuān "" " 带有dài yǒu dài yǒu 价值jià zhí jià zhí 判断pàn duàn pàn duàn ;; ; 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 会huì huì 将jiāng jiāng 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为wèi wèi "" " 完善wán shàn wán shàn "" " 或huò huò "" " 澄清chéng qīng chéng qīng "" " 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 。。 。
The phrasing "loosening of racial hate-speech laws" accurately reflects the Coalition government's intent to modify (and what critics argued would weaken) section 18C protections, though "loosening" carries a valence judgment; the government would have characterized the changes as "refining" or "clarifying" the law.

📚 来源与引用 (1)

  1. 1
    Race-hate inquiry labelled a 'shambles' after Aboriginal Legal Service barred

    Race-hate inquiry labelled a 'shambles' after Aboriginal Legal Service barred

    The Aboriginal Legal Service has been knocked back from attending a Senate hearing to discuss changes to the Racial Discrimination Act.

    NITV

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。