部分属实

评分: 7.0/10

Coalition
C0343

声明内容

“将100名庇护寻求者赶到街头,未经通知便剥夺他们的收入,此前还禁止他们工作。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

核心hé xīn hé xīn 声明shēng míng shēng míng 基本上jī běn shàng jī běn shàng 是shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de 。。 。
The core claim is substantially accurate.
20172017 2017 年nián nián 88 8 月yuè yuè ,, , CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 终止zhōng zhǐ zhōng zhǐ 了le le 约yuē yuē 100100 100 名míng míng 庇护bì hù bì hù 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 者zhě zhě 的de de 福利金fú lì jīn fú lì jīn 和hé hé 住房zhù fáng zhù fáng 支持zhī chí zhī chí 。。 。
In August 2017, the Coalition government terminated welfare payments and housing support for approximately 100 asylum seekers who had been transferred from Manus Island and Nauru detention centers to Australia for medical treatment [1].
这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 庇护bì hù bì hù 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 者zhě zhě 是从shì cóng shì cóng 马努斯mǎ nǔ sī mǎ nǔ sī 岛dǎo dǎo 和hé hé 诺鲁岛nuò lǔ dǎo nuò lǔ dǎo 拘留jū liú jū liú 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn 转移zhuǎn yí zhuǎn yí 到dào dào 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 接受jiē shòu jiē shòu 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 的de de [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
On Friday, August 25, 2017, the Department of Immigration notified affected asylum seekers that their welfare payments of $200 per fortnight would cease effective Monday, August 28, 2017 [2].
20172017 2017 年nián nián 88 8 月yuè yuè 2525 25 日rì rì 星期五xīng qī wǔ xīng qī wǔ ,, , 移民部yí mín bù yí mín bù 通知tōng zhī tōng zhī 受shòu shòu 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 的de de 庇护bì hù bì hù 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 者zhě zhě ,, , 他们tā men tā men 每měi měi 两周liǎng zhōu liǎng zhōu 收取shōu qǔ shōu qǔ 的de de 200200 200 澳元ào yuán ào yuán 福利金fú lì jīn fú lì jīn 将jiāng jiāng 于yú yú 20172017 2017 年nián nián 88 8 月yuè yuè 2828 28 日rì rì 星期xīng qī xīng qī 一起yì qǐ yì qǐ 停止tíng zhǐ tíng zhǐ 发放fā fàng fā fàng [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
Simultaneously, they were given three weeks' notice to vacate government-supported housing [2].
同时tóng shí tóng shí ,, , 他们tā men tā men 被bèi bèi 通知tōng zhī tōng zhī 需要xū yào xū yào 在zài zài 三周sān zhōu sān zhōu 内nèi nèi 搬出bān chū bān chū 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 支持zhī chí zhī chí 的de de 住房zhù fáng zhù fáng [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
This policy applied asylum seekers placed on a new visa category, the "Final Departure Bridging E Visa" [1].
该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 适用shì yòng shì yòng 于yú yú 被bèi bèi 划分huà fēn huà fēn 为wèi wèi 新xīn xīn 签证qiān zhèng qiān zhèng 类别lèi bié lèi bié "" " 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 离境lí jìng lí jìng 临时lín shí lín shí EE E 类lèi lèi 签证qiān zhèng qiān zhèng (( ( FinalFinal Final DepartureDeparture Departure BridgingBridging Bridging EE E VisaVisa Visa )) ) "" " 的de de 庇护bì hù bì hù 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 者zhě zhě [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The Human Rights Law Centre and Asylum Seeker Resource Centre both confirmed the "100 asylum seekers" figure as accurate for the immediate impact of the policy [1].
人权rén quán rén quán 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn 和hé hé 庇护bì hù bì hù 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 者zhě zhě 资源zī yuán zī yuán 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn 均jūn jūn 确认què rèn què rèn "" " 约yuē yuē 100100 100 名míng míng 庇护bì hù bì hù 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 者zhě zhě "" " 这一zhè yī zhè yī 数字shù zì shù zì 对于duì yú duì yú 该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 的de de 立即lì jí lì jí 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 是shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The UNHCR estimated "approximately 70 highly vulnerable people" were initially informed of the change [3].
联合国lián hé guó lián hé guó 难民署nàn mín shǔ nàn mín shǔ (( ( UNHCRUNHCR UNHCR )) ) 估计gū jì gū jì "" " 约yuē yuē 7070 70 名míng míng 高度gāo dù gāo dù 脆弱cuì ruò cuì ruò 的de de 人rén rén "" " 最初zuì chū zuì chū 收到shōu dào shōu dào 了le le 变更biàn gēng biàn gēng 通知tōng zhī tōng zhī [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。

缺失背景

然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 该gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng 省略shěng lüè shěng lüè 了le le 关于guān yú guān yú 庇护bì hù bì hù 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 者zhě zhě 身份shēn fèn shēn fèn 和hé hé 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 的de de 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 。。 。
However, the claim omits important context about the asylum seekers' status and the government's stated rationale.
这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 人rén rén 是shì shì 因yīn yīn 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 治疗zhì liáo zhì liáo 从cóng cóng 海外hǎi wài hǎi wài 拘留jū liú jū liú 地dì dì 转移zhuǎn yí zhuǎn yí 到dào dào 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 的de de ,, , 前qián qián 一届yī jiè yī jiè 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 明确míng què míng què 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 他们tā men tā men 在zài zài 治疗zhì liáo zhì liáo 完成wán chéng wán chéng 后hòu hòu 将jiāng jiāng 返回fǎn huí fǎn huí 海外hǎi wài hǎi wài 审查shěn chá shěn chá 程序chéng xù chéng xù [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
These individuals had been transferred to Australia from offshore detention specifically for medical treatment, with explicit assurance from the previous government that they would return to offshore processing once treatment was completed [4].
CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 将jiāng jiāng 这zhè zhè 一yī yī 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 定性dìng xìng dìng xìng 为wèi wèi 确保què bǎo què bǎo 庇护bì hù bì hù 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 者zhě zhě 不会bú huì bú huì 在zài zài 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 定居dìng jū dìng jū ,, , 这zhè zhè 与yǔ yǔ 劳工láo gōng láo gōng 党dǎng dǎng (( ( LaborLabor Labor )) ) 肯kěn kěn ·· · 鲁德lǔ dé lǔ dé (( ( KevinKevin Kevin RuddRudd Rudd )) ) 于yú yú 20132013 2013 年nián nián 77 7 月yuè yuè 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì 的de de 跨kuà kuà 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 原则yuán zé yuán zé 一致yí zhì yí zhì ,, , 即jí jí 乘船chéng chuán chéng chuán 到达dào dá dào dá 的de de 庇护bì hù bì hù 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 者zhě zhě 不会bú huì bú huì 被bèi bèi 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 安置ān zhì ān zhì 在zài zài 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
The Coalition government characterized the policy as ensuring that asylum seekers would not be settled in Australia, consistent with the bipartisan principle established by Labor's Kevin Rudd in July 2013 that boat arrivals would not be resettled in Australia [5].
"" " 禁止jìn zhǐ jìn zhǐ 他们tā men tā men 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò "" " 的de de 描述miáo shù miáo shù 需要xū yào xū yào 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 限定xiàn dìng xiàn dìng 条件tiáo jiàn tiáo jiàn 。。 。
The characterization of "preventing them from working" requires significant qualification.
这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 庇护bì hù bì hù 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 者zhě zhě 之前zhī qián zhī qián 的de de 签证qiān zhèng qiān zhèng 状态zhuàng tài zhuàng tài (( ( 从cóng cóng 海外hǎi wài hǎi wài 拘留jū liú jū liú 转移zhuǎn yí zhuǎn yí 而ér ér 来lái lái )) ) 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 了le le 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 权利quán lì quán lì 。。 。
The previous visa status of these asylum seekers (transferred from offshore detention) restricted work rights.
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 20172017 2017 年nián nián 88 8 月yuè yuè 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 下xià xià 颁发bān fā bān fā 的de de "" " 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 离境lí jìng lí jìng 临时lín shí lín shí EE E 类lèi lèi 签证qiān zhèng qiān zhèng "" " 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 首次shǒu cì shǒu cì 授予shòu yǔ shòu yǔ 了le le 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 权利quán lì quán lì -- - 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 了le le 之前zhī qián zhī qián 的de de 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
However, the "Final Departure Bridging E Visa" issued under the August 2017 policy actually **granted** work rights for the first time—reversing previous restrictions [1].
这zhè zhè 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 着zhe zhe 放宽fàng kuān fàng kuān 就业jiù yè jiù yè 禁令jìn lìng jìn lìng ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 新增xīn zēng xīn zēng 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 。。 。
This represents a lifting of employment prohibitions, not their imposition.
移民yí mín yí mín 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 彼得bǐ dé bǐ dé ·· · 达顿dá dùn dá dùn (( ( PeterPeter Peter DuttonDutton Dutton )) ) 表达biǎo dá biǎo dá 了le le 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng :: : "" " 他们tā men tā men 将jiāng jiāng 在zài zài 其他qí tā qí tā 地方dì fāng dì fāng 定居dìng jū dìng jū 。。 。
Immigration Minister Peter Dutton stated the government's position: "They will be settled elsewhere.
这zhè zhè 就是jiù shì jiù shì 这个zhè ge zhè ge 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 的de de 目的mù dì mù dì "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
That's what this is about" [2].
尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 在技术上zài jì shù shàng zài jì shù shàng 授予shòu yǔ shòu yǔ 了le le 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 权限quán xiàn quán xiàn ,, , 但dàn dàn 同时tóng shí tóng shí 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 收入shōu rù shōu rù 支持zhī chí zhī chí 并bìng bìng 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 在zài zài 三周sān zhōu sān zhōu 内nèi nèi 搬出bān chū bān chū 住房zhù fáng zhù fáng ,, , 使shǐ shǐ 获得huò dé huò dé 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 在zài zài 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 变得biàn dé biàn dé 必要bì yào bì yào 且qiě qiě 困难kùn nán kùn nán [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
While the work permission was technically granted, the simultaneous removal of all income support and requirement to vacate housing within three weeks made securing employment practically necessary and difficult [3].

来源可信度评估

原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán TheThe The NewNew New DailyDaily Daily 是shì shì 一家yī jiā yī jiā 左倾zuǒ qīng zuǒ qīng 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 新闻媒体xīn wén méi tǐ xīn wén méi tǐ ,, , 由yóu yóu 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 退休tuì xiū tuì xiū 基金jī jīn jī jīn 于yú yú 20132013 2013 年nián nián 创立chuàng lì chuàng lì ,, , 由前yóu qián yóu qián 劳工láo gōng láo gōng 党dǎng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 格雷格gé léi gé gé léi gé ·· · 康比kāng bǐ kāng bǐ (( ( GregGreg Greg CombetCombet Combet )) ) 领导lǐng dǎo lǐng dǎo [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
The original source, The New Daily, is a left-center mainstream news outlet founded in 2013 by Australian superannuation funds and led by former Labor Party minister Greg Combet [6].
据jù jù 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 偏见piān jiàn piān jiàn // / 事实shì shí shì shí 核查hé chá hé chá (( ( MediaMedia Media BiasBias Bias // / FactFact Fact CheckCheck Check )) ) 评级píng jí píng jí ,, , TheThe The NewNew New DailyDaily Daily 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu "" " 高信gāo xìn gāo xìn 赋度fù dù fù dù "" " ,, , 报道bào dào bào dào "" " 大多数dà duō shù dà duō shù 为wèi wèi 事实shì shí shì shí "" " ,, , 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 其qí qí 编辑biān jí biān jí 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn 呈现chéng xiàn chéng xiàn 适度shì dù shì dù 左倾zuǒ qīng zuǒ qīng 倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
According to Media Bias/Fact Check, The New Daily is rated as having "High Credibility" with "Mostly Factual" reporting, though it maintains a moderately left-leaning editorial perspective [6].
大多数dà duō shù dà duō shù 新闻报道xīn wén bào dào xīn wén bào dào 来自lái zì lái zì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 联合社lián hé shè lián hé shè (( ( AAPAAP AAP )) ) ,, , 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn 类lèi lèi 内容nèi róng nèi róng 标注biāo zhù biāo zhù 清晰qīng xī qīng xī [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
Most news stories originate from Australian Associated Press (AAP), with opinion content properly labeled [6].
该gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng 的de de 事实shì shí shì shí 已yǐ yǐ 被bèi bèi SBSSBS SBS 新闻xīn wén xīn wén (( ( 一家yī jiā yī jiā 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 偏见piān jiàn piān jiàn 较jiào jiào 小xiǎo xiǎo 的de de 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 公共广播gōng gòng guǎng bō gōng gòng guǎng bō 公司gōng sī gōng sī )) ) 、、 、 联合国lián hé guó lián hé guó 难民署nàn mín shǔ nàn mín shǔ (( ( UNHCRUNHCR UNHCR ,, , 联合国lián hé guó lián hé guó 机构jī gòu jī gòu )) ) 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 人权rén quán rén quán 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn 和hé hé 庇护bì hù bì hù 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 者zhě zhě 资源zī yuán zī yuán 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn 等děng děng 知名zhī míng zhī míng 人权rén quán rén quán 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 独立dú lì dú lì 验证yàn zhèng yàn zhèng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
The claim's facts were independently verified by SBS News (a major public broadcaster with minimal political bias), the UNHCR (United Nations body), and established human rights organizations including the Human Rights Law Centre and Asylum Seeker Resource Centre [1][2][3].
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * 劳工láo gōng láo gōng 党dǎng dǎng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 采纳cǎi nà cǎi nà 了le le 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 庇护bì hù bì hù 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 者zhě zhě 福利fú lì fú lì 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè ?? ?
**Did Labor adopt similar asylum seeker welfare policies?** Both major Australian parties have supported tough asylum seeker deterrent policies since 2001, though using different mechanisms [5].
** * ** *
Labor's Kevin Rudd (2013, his second term as Prime Minister) announced an even stricter framework than the Coalition ultimately implemented: all asylum seekers arriving by boat would be sent offshore indefinitely with no resettlement in Australia [5].
自zì zì 20012001 2001 年nián nián 以来yǐ lái yǐ lái ,, , 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 都dōu dōu 支持zhī chí zhī chí 对duì duì 庇护bì hù bì hù 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 者zhě zhě 采取cǎi qǔ cǎi qǔ 严厉yán lì yán lì 的de de 威慑wēi shè wēi shè 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè ,, , 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 了le le 不同bù tóng bù tóng 的de de 机制jī zhì jī zhì [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
The Labor government under Julia Gillard (2010-2013) reversed Kevin Rudd's initial liberal approach and returned to offshore processing in Nauru and Papua New Guinea in response to increased boat arrivals [5].
劳工láo gōng láo gōng 党dǎng dǎng 的de de 肯kěn kěn ·· · 鲁德lǔ dé lǔ dé (( ( 20132013 2013 年nián nián ,, , 他tā tā 第二次dì èr cì dì èr cì 担任dān rèn dān rèn 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ 时期shí qī shí qī )) ) 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 了le le 比bǐ bǐ CoalitionCoalition Coalition 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 实施shí shī shí shī 的de de 更为gèng wéi gèng wéi 严格yán gé yán gé 的de de 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià :: : 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 乘船chéng chuán chéng chuán 到达dào dá dào dá 的de de 庇护bì hù bì hù 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 者zhě zhě 将jiāng jiāng 被bèi bèi 无wú wú 期限qī xiàn qī xiàn 送往sòng wǎng sòng wǎng 海外hǎi wài hǎi wài 拘留jū liú jū liú ,, , 不会bú huì bú huì 在zài zài 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 安置ān zhì ān zhì [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
Both governments maintained detention and deterrent approaches.
朱zhū zhū 莉娅lì yà lì yà ·· · 吉拉德jí lā dé jí lā dé (( ( JuliaJulia Julia GillardGillard Gillard )) ) 领导lǐng dǎo lǐng dǎo 的de de 劳工láo gōng láo gōng 党dǎng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ (( ( 20102010 2010 -- - 20132013 2013 年nián nián )) ) 回答huí dá huí dá 了le le 肯kěn kěn ·· · 鲁德lǔ dé lǔ dé 初期chū qī chū qī 的de de 自由派zì yóu pài zì yóu pài 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ ,, , 由于yóu yú yóu yú 乘船chéng chuán chéng chuán 到达dào dá dào dá 人数rén shù rén shù 增加zēng jiā zēng jiā ,, , 重新启动chóng xīn qǐ dòng chóng xīn qǐ dòng 了le le 在zài zài 诺鲁nuò lǔ nuò lǔ 和hé hé 巴布亚新几内亚bā bù yà xīn jǐ nèi yà bā bù yà xīn jǐ nèi yà 的de de 海外hǎi wài hǎi wài 审查shěn chá shěn chá [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
However, no direct Labor equivalent to the August 2017 welfare removal policy has been identified in the research.
两届liǎng jiè liǎng jiè 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 都dōu dōu 维持wéi chí wéi chí 拘留jū liú jū liú 和hé hé 威慑wēi shè wēi shè 方法fāng fǎ fāng fǎ 。。 。
Labor's tough deterrent approach focused more on offshore detention and people-smuggling disruption rather than income support removal for those in Australia [5].
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 在zài zài 研究yán jiū yán jiū 中未zhōng wèi zhōng wèi 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn 劳工láo gōng láo gōng 党dǎng dǎng 有yǒu yǒu 与yǔ yǔ 20172017 2017 年nián nián 88 8 月yuè yuè 福利fú lì fú lì 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 相当xiāng dāng xiāng dāng 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 。。 。
The Parliamentary Library's comparison of Coalition and Labor asylum policies notes both parties support mandatory detention and offshore processing, but welfare removal as a coercion mechanism appears more specific to the Coalition's August 2017 policy [5].
劳工láo gōng láo gōng 党dǎng dǎng 的de de 严厉yán lì yán lì 威慑wēi shè wēi shè 方法fāng fǎ fāng fǎ 更多地gèng duō dì gèng duō dì 集中jí zhōng jí zhōng 在zài zài 海外hǎi wài hǎi wài 拘留jū liú jū liú 和hé hé 打击dǎ jī dǎ jī 人口rén kǒu rén kǒu 贩运fàn yùn fàn yùn 上shàng shàng ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 对duì duì 在zài zài 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 的de de 人rén rén 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 收入shōu rù shōu rù 支持zhī chí zhī chí [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
国会guó huì guó huì 图书馆tú shū guǎn tú shū guǎn 对duì duì CoalitionCoalition Coalition 和hé hé 劳工láo gōng láo gōng 党dǎng dǎng 庇护bì hù bì hù 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 的de de 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū ,, , 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 都dōu dōu 支持zhī chí zhī chí 强制qiáng zhì qiáng zhì 拘留jū liú jū liú 和hé hé 海外hǎi wài hǎi wài 审查shěn chá shěn chá ,, , 但dàn dàn 将jiāng jiāng 福利fú lì fú lì 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 强制手段qiáng zhì shǒu duàn qiáng zhì shǒu duàn 似乎sì hū sì hū 是shì shì CoalitionCoalition Coalition 特有tè yǒu tè yǒu 的de de 20172017 2017 年nián nián 88 8 月yuè yuè 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 批评者pī píng zhě pī píng zhě 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 在zài zài 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 充分chōng fèn chōng fèn 通知tōng zhī tōng zhī 的de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 下xià xià 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 收入shōu rù shōu rù 支持zhī chí zhī chí 使shǐ shǐ 脆弱cuì ruò cuì ruò 人群rén qún rén qún "" " 面临miàn lín miàn lín 在zài zài 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 陷于xiàn yú xiàn yú 贫困pín kùn pín kùn 的de de 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 风险fēng xiǎn fēng xiǎn "" " (( ( 联合国lián hé guó lián hé guó 难民署nàn mín shǔ nàn mín shǔ 声明shēng míng shēng míng )) ) ,, , 但dàn dàn 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 是shì shì 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 庇护bì hù bì hù 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 者zhě zhě 是shì shì 专门zhuān mén zhuān mén 为wèi wèi 接受jiē shòu jiē shòu 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 治疗zhì liáo zhì liáo 而ér ér 被bèi bèi 带到dài dào dài dào 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 的de de ,, , 明确míng què míng què 了解liǎo jiě liǎo jiě 他们tā men tā men 将jiāng jiāng 返回fǎn huí fǎn huí 海外hǎi wài hǎi wài 审查shěn chá shěn chá 程序chéng xù chéng xù [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
While critics argue that removing all income support without adequate notice left vulnerable people "at serious risk of destitution in Australia" (UNHCR statement), the government's justification was that these asylum seekers had been brought to Australia specifically for medical treatment with explicit understanding they would return to offshore processing [2][4].
移民yí mín yí mín 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 彼得bǐ dé bǐ dé ·· · 达顿dá dùn dá dùn 将jiāng jiāng 持续chí xù chí xù 依赖yī lài yī lài 福利fú lì fú lì 定性dìng xìng dìng xìng 为wèi wèi "" " 滥用làn yòng làn yòng 制度zhì dù zhì dù "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
Immigration officials characterized continued dependency on welfare as "exploiting the system" [2].
该gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng 将jiāng jiāng 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 定性dìng xìng dìng xìng 为wèi wèi 异常yì cháng yì cháng 严苛yán kē yán kē (( ( "" " 赶到gǎn dào gǎn dào 街头jiē tóu jiē tóu "" " )) ) ,, , 而ér ér 三天sān tiān sān tiān 通知tōng zhī tōng zhī 期qī qī (( ( 从cóng cóng 星期五xīng qī wǔ xīng qī wǔ 到dào dào 星期一xīng qī yī xīng qī yī 实施shí shī shí shī )) ) 确实què shí què shí 看似kàn shì kàn shì 对duì duì 实际shí jì shí jì 搬迁bān qiān bān qiān 和hé hé 就业jiù yè jiù yè 决策jué cè jué cè 的de de 最小zuì xiǎo zuì xiǎo 预告yù gào yù gào 期qī qī 。。 。
The claim frames the policy as exceptionally harsh ("kicked into the street"), and the 3-day notice period (Friday to Monday implementation) does appear minimal for practical relocation and employment decisions.
人权rén quán rén quán 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn 执行zhí xíng zhí xíng 董事dǒng shì dǒng shì 休xiū xiū ·· · 德dé dé ·· · 克雷kè léi kè léi 特塞tè sāi tè sāi (( ( HughHugh Hugh dede de KretserKretser Kretser )) ) 将jiāng jiāng 其qí qí 形容xíng róng xíng róng 为wèi wèi "" " 毫无háo wú háo wú 任何rèn hé rèn hé 通知tōng zhī tōng zhī "" " ,, , 捕捉bǔ zhuō bǔ zhuō 了le le 倡导者chàng dǎo zhě chàng dǎo zhě 的de de 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn ,, , 即jí jí 三天sān tiān sān tiān 时间shí jiān shí jiān 对于duì yú duì yú 实际shí jì shí jì 预告yù gào yù gào 来说lái shuō lái shuō 是shì shì 不bù bù 充分chōng fèn chōng fèn 的de de [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
Human Rights Law Centre executive director Hugh de Kretser characterized it as "with no notice whatsoever," capturing the advocates' perspective that three days provided insufficient warning [1].
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 从技术上cóng jì shù shàng cóng jì shù shàng 讲jiǎng jiǎng ,, , 三天sān tiān sān tiān 通知tōng zhī tōng zhī 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi "" " 毫无háo wú háo wú 通知tōng zhī tōng zhī "" " —— — —— — 它tā tā 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 了le le 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng ,, , 即jí jí 变更biàn gēng biàn gēng 是shì shì 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 明míng míng 了le le 的de de ,, , 无需wú xū wú xū 延长yán cháng yán cháng 过渡期guò dù qī guò dù qī [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
However, three days notice is technically not "no notice"—it represents the government's position that the change was straightforward and required no extended transition period [2].
该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 确实què shí què shí 授予shòu yǔ shòu yǔ 了le le 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 权利quán lì quán lì (( ( 之前zhī qián zhī qián 被bèi bèi 禁止jìn zhǐ jìn zhǐ )) ) ,, , 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 时间表shí jiān biǎo shí jiān biǎo 使shǐ shǐ 就业jiù yè jiù yè 在zài zài 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 变得biàn dé biàn dé 必要bì yào bì yào 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 的de de 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The policy did grant work rights (previously denied), though the timeline made employment practically necessary rather than a genuine choice [1].
独立dú lì dú lì 分析表明fēn xī biǎo míng fēn xī biǎo míng ,, , 这zhè zhè 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 了le le 对duì duì 庇护bì hù bì hù 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 者zhě zhě 采取cǎi qǔ cǎi qǔ 严厉yán lì yán lì 威慑wēi shè wēi shè 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 的de de 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 共识gòng shí gòng shí 。。 。
Independent analysis suggests this reflects a broader bipartisan commitment to harsh deterrent policies on asylum seekers.
联合国lián hé guó lián hé guó 难民署nàn mín shǔ nàn mín shǔ 批评pī píng pī píng 这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 方法fāng fǎ fāng fǎ 是shì shì 强制性qiáng zhì xìng qiáng zhì xìng 的de de ,, , 但dàn dàn 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 共识gòng shí gòng shí (( ( 劳工láo gōng láo gōng 党dǎng dǎng 和hé hé CoalitionCoalition Coalition )) ) 支持zhī chí zhī chí 海外hǎi wài hǎi wài 审查shěn chá shěn chá 和hé hé 拘留jū liú jū liú [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
The UNHCR criticized the approach as coercive, but mainstream Australian political consensus (Labor and Coalition) supports offshore processing and detention [5][3]. **Key context:** This policy is not unique to the Coalition in its toughness, but Labor's equivalent deterrent measures took different forms (offshore detention, people-smuggling prevention) rather than income support removal specifically.
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng :: : ** * ** * 这项zhè xiàng zhè xiàng 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 在zài zài 其qí qí 严厉yán lì yán lì 性上xìng shàng xìng shàng 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu ,, , 但dàn dàn 劳工láo gōng láo gōng 党dǎng dǎng 的de de 等效děng xiào děng xiào 威慑wēi shè wēi shè 措施cuò shī cuò shī 采取cǎi qǔ cǎi qǔ 了le le 不同bù tóng bù tóng 形式xíng shì xíng shì (( ( 海外hǎi wài hǎi wài 拘留jū liú jū liú 、、 、 打击dǎ jī dǎ jī 人口rén kǒu rén kǒu 贩运fàn yùn fàn yùn )) ) ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 专门zhuān mén zhuān mén 的de de 收入shōu rù shōu rù 支持zhī chí zhī chí 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 。。 。

部分属实

7.0

/ 10

20172017 2017 年nián nián 88 8 月yuè yuè 的de de CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 确实què shí què shí 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 了le le 约yuē yuē 100100 100 名míng míng 庇护bì hù bì hù 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 者zhě zhě 的de de 福利fú lì fú lì 收入shōu rù shōu rù (( ( 每měi měi 两周liǎng zhōu liǎng zhōu 200200 200 澳元ào yuán ào yuán )) ) ,, , 并bìng bìng 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 他们tā men tā men 在zài zài 极短jí duǎn jí duǎn (( ( 33 3 天tiān tiān )) ) 通知tōng zhī tōng zhī 期内qī nèi qī nèi 搬出bān chū bān chū 住房zhù fáng zhù fáng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The August 2017 Coalition policy did remove welfare income ($200 fortnightly) from approximately 100 asylum seekers and required them to vacate housing with minimal (3-day) notice [1][2].
"" " 毫无háo wú háo wú 通知tōng zhī tōng zhī "" " 的de de 描述miáo shù miáo shù 是shì shì 对于duì yú duì yú 技术jì shù jì shù 上shàng shàng 三天sān tiān sān tiān 通知tōng zhī tōng zhī 的de de 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 性xìng xìng 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù ,, , 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 是shì shì 最小zuì xiǎo zuì xiǎo 的de de 预告yù gào yù gào 期qī qī [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The characterization as "no notice" is advocacy framing for what was technically three days' notification, though minimal for practical purposes [1][2].
关于guān yú guān yú "" " 禁止jìn zhǐ jìn zhǐ 他们tā men tā men 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò "" " 的de de 声明shēng míng shēng míng 在zài zài 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 指向zhǐ xiàng zhǐ xiàng 20172017 2017 年nián nián 88 8 月yuè yuè 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 时shí shí 是shì shì 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng 的de de —— — —— — 新xīn xīn 的de de 签证qiān zhèng qiān zhèng 状态zhuàng tài zhuàng tài 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 授予shòu yǔ shòu yǔ 了le le 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 权利quán lì quán lì —— — —— — 但dàn dàn 在历史上zài lì shǐ shàng zài lì shǐ shàng 是shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de ,, , 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 人rén rén 之前zhī qián zhī qián 在zài zài 海外hǎi wài hǎi wài 拘留jū liú jū liú 中zhōng zhōng 被bèi bèi 禁止jìn zhǐ jìn zhǐ 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The claim about "preventing them from working" is misleading regarding the August 2017 policy specifically—the new visa status actually granted work rights—but historically accurate as these individuals had previously been prohibited from working in offshore detention [1].
核心hé xīn hé xīn 叙事xù shì xù shì 是shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de :: : 脆弱cuì ruò cuì ruò 的de de 庇护bì hù bì hù 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 者zhě zhě 被bèi bèi 突然tū rán tū rán 切断qiē duàn qiē duàn 了le le 收入shōu rù shōu rù 支持zhī chí zhī chí 和hé hé 住房zhù fáng zhù fáng ,, , 时间表shí jiān biǎo shí jiān biǎo 很hěn hěn 紧jǐn jǐn ,, , 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 是shì shì 他们tā men tā men 被bèi bèi 按照àn zhào àn zhào 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 共识gòng shí gòng shí 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 持有chí yǒu chí yǒu ,, , 即jí jí 乘船chéng chuán chéng chuán 到达dào dá dào dá 者zhě zhě 不会bú huì bú huì 在zài zài 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 定居dìng jū dìng jū [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
The core narrative is accurate: vulnerable asylum seekers were abruptly cut off from income support and housing within a short timeframe, with government justification that they were being held to bipartisan policy that boat arrivals would not be settled in Australia [2][4][5].

📚 来源与引用 (8)

  1. 1
    SBS News: "Shocking cruelty: Government launches welfare crackdown on asylum seekers in Australia"

    SBS News: "Shocking cruelty: Government launches welfare crackdown on asylum seekers in Australia"

    The federal government intends to cut off a $200-a-fortnight welfare payment from asylum seekers and give them three weeks to move out of public housing.

    SBS News
  2. 2
    unhcr.org

    UNHCR Press Release: "Australia should not coerce vulnerable people to return to harm"

    Unhcr

  3. 3
    The Conversation: "Spot the difference: Labor vs the Coalition on asylum seekers"

    The Conversation: "Spot the difference: Labor vs the Coalition on asylum seekers"

    Following the Labor conference’s decision to leave open the option of turning back asylum seeker boats, are there any differences left between Labor’s asylum policies and the Coalition’s?

    The Conversation
  4. 4
    Parliamentary Library: "A comparison of Coalition and Labor government asylum policies in Australia since 2001"

    Parliamentary Library: "A comparison of Coalition and Labor government asylum policies in Australia since 2001"

    Research

    Aph Gov
  5. 5
    The Conversation: "Australia's asylum seeker policy history: a story of blunders and shame"

    The Conversation: "Australia's asylum seeker policy history: a story of blunders and shame"

    Prime Minister Scott Morrison can learn from the pitfalls that contributed to the downfall of the Rudd and Gillard governments.

    The Conversation
  6. 6
    Media Bias/Fact Check: "The New Daily - Bias and Credibility"

    Media Bias/Fact Check: "The New Daily - Bias and Credibility"

    LEFT-CENTER BIAS These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording

    Media Bias/Fact Check
  7. 7
    Human Rights Law Centre: "Asylum seeker welfare policy responses"

    Human Rights Law Centre: "Asylum seeker welfare policy responses"

    Humanrights Org
  8. 8
    Asylum Seeker Resource Centre official statements on 2017 policy

    Asylum Seeker Resource Centre official statements on 2017 policy

    You can help refugees and people seeking asylum in Australia by making a generous donation or by taking action. There are many ways to help, join us today!

    Asylum Seeker Resource Centre

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。