部分属实

评分: 6.0/10

Coalition
C0279

声明内容

“在花费87,000澳元对抗关于幕后交易的信息自由请求后,又对费用金额撒谎。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis
分析时间: 30 Jan 2026

原始来源

事实核查

gāi gāi 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng de de 核心hé xīn hé xīn 事实shì shí shì shí 基本jī běn jī běn 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 方式fāng shì fāng shì 需要xū yào xū yào gèng gèng 细致xì zhì xì zhì de de 解读jiě dú jiě dú
The core facts of this claim are substantially accurate, though the framing requires nuance.
联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 花费huā fèi huā fèi le le 8787 87 ,, , 000000 000 澳元ào yuán ào yuán de de 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng 用于yòng yú yòng yú wèi wèi 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 乔尔qiáo ěr qiáo ěr ·· · 菲茨fēi cí fēi cí 吉本jí běn jí běn (( ( JoelJoel Joel FitzgibbonFitzgibbon Fitzgibbon )) ) 提起tí qǐ tí qǐ de de 诉讼sù sòng sù sòng 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 辩护biàn hù biàn hù gāi gāi 诉讼sù sòng sù sòng 旨在zhǐ zài zhǐ zài 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ 联盟lián méng lián méng 协议xié yì xié yì 规定guī dìng guī dìng 自由党zì yóu dǎng zì yóu dǎng 国家guó jiā guó jiā dǎng dǎng 如何rú hé rú hé 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 联盟lián méng lián méng 运作yùn zuò yùn zuò de de 正式zhèng shì zhèng shì 协议xié yì xié yì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The Coalition government did spend $87,000 in legal costs defending a court case brought by Labor's Joel Fitzgibbon seeking access to the Coalition agreement (the formal agreement between the Liberal and National parties governing how they operate as a coalition) [1].
20182018 2018 nián nián 22 2 yuè yuè 马尔科mǎ ěr kē mǎ ěr kē ·· · 特恩tè ēn tè ēn 布尔bù ěr bù ěr (( ( MalcolmMalcolm Malcolm TurnbullTurnbull Turnbull )) ) 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ zài zài 议会yì huì yì huì 问答wèn dá wèn dá 环节huán jié huán jié 透露tòu lù tòu lù "" " 迄今为止qì jīn wéi zhǐ qì jīn wéi zhǐ 联邦政府lián bāng zhèng fǔ lián bāng zhèng fǔ de de 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng wèi wèi 8787 87 ,, , 000000 000 澳元ào yuán ào yuán "" " 用于yòng yú yòng yú wèi wèi 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ jiāng jiāng 联盟lián méng lián méng 协议xié yì xié yì 归类guī lèi guī lèi wèi wèi 不受bù shòu bù shòu 信息xìn xī xìn xī 自由zì yóu zì yóu 约束yuē shù yuē shù de de 政党政治zhèng dǎng zhèng zhì zhèng dǎng zhèng zhì 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn de de 决定jué dìng jué dìng 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 辩护biàn hù biàn hù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
In February 2018, Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull revealed during question time that "the commonwealth's legal fees so far have been $87,000" in defending the government's decision to classify the Coalition agreement as a party political document not subject to Freedom of Information Act (FOI) disclosure [1].
所涉suǒ shè suǒ shè 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn wèi wèi 自由党zì yóu dǎng zì yóu dǎng 国家guó jiā guó jiā dǎng dǎng 之间zhī jiān zhī jiān de de 联盟lián méng lián méng 协议xié yì xié yì 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 试图shì tú shì tú 通过tōng guò tōng guò 信息xìn xī xìn xī 自由zì yóu zì yóu 途径tú jìng tú jìng 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ gāi gāi 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
The document in question was the agreement between the Liberal Party and National Party on their joint government, which Labor sought to access through FOI [2].
这起zhè qǐ zhè qǐ 法律纠纷fǎ lǜ jiū fēn fǎ lǜ jiū fēn de de 起因qǐ yīn qǐ yīn shì shì 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 乔尔qiáo ěr qiáo ěr ·· · 菲茨fēi cí fēi cí 吉本jí běn jí běn 根据gēn jù gēn jù 信息xìn xī xìn xī 自由zì yóu zì yóu 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ 联盟lián méng lián méng 协议xié yì xié yì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The legal dispute arose after Labor's Joel Fitzgibbon sought the Coalition agreement under freedom of information laws [1].
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 辩称biàn chēng biàn chēng 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 领袖lǐng xiù lǐng xiù 之间zhī jiān zhī jiān de de 私人sī rén sī rén 信函xìn hán xìn hán gāi gāi 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 属于shǔ yú shǔ yú 信息xìn xī xìn xī 自由zì yóu zì yóu 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú de de 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The government argued that as a private letter between two political party leaders, the document fell outside FOI requirements [1].
此案cǐ àn cǐ àn jīng jīng 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng 上诉shàng sù shàng sù 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng (( ( AATAAT AAT )) ) 审理shěn lǐ shěn lǐ hòu hòu yòu yòu 提交tí jiāo tí jiāo zhì zhì 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 巡回xún huí xún huí 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 菲茨fēi cí fēi cí 吉本jí běn jí běn de de 初步chū bù chū bù 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng zài zài gāi gāi 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn bèi bèi 驳回bó huí bó huí [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
This case went through the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) and then to the Federal Circuit Court, where Fitzgibbon's initial application was rejected [1].

缺失背景

gāi gāi 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu le le 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 信息xìn xī xìn xī
The claim omits several important contextual elements: **1.
** * ** * 11 1 .. . 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 程序chéng xù chéng xù 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 性质xìng zhì xìng zhì ** * ** *
Legal Process & Status as Party Political Document** The federal circuit court had already ruled that the AAT was correct in refusing to release the document [1].
联邦lián bāng lián bāng 巡回xún huí xún huí 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 裁定cái dìng cái dìng 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng 上诉shàng sù shàng sù 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 拒绝jù jué jù jué 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi gāi gāi 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn shì shì 正确zhèng què zhèng què de de [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The legal principle at issue—whether a coalition agreement between two political parties constitutes a government document or a party political document—is substantive.
suǒ suǒ 涉及shè jí shè jí de de 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 原则yuán zé yuán zé shì shì 实质性shí zhì xìng shí zhì xìng de de 联盟lián méng lián méng 协议xié yì xié yì 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 构成gòu chéng gòu chéng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn huò huò 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn
Coalition agreements are agreements between the parties that govern how they work together, but are not government policy documents themselves [3].
联盟lián méng lián méng 协议xié yì xié yì shì shì 规范guī fàn guī fàn 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 如何rú hé rú hé 合作hé zuò hé zuò de de 协议xié yì xié yì dàn dàn 本身běn shēn běn shēn 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
The court's decision reflected established legal precedent about what constitutes a "government document" under FOI law. **2.
法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn de de 判决pàn jué pàn jué 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng le le 关于guān yú guān yú 信息xìn xī xìn xī 自由zì yóu zì yóu 法下fǎ xià fǎ xià 何为hé wèi hé wèi "" " 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn "" " de de 既定jì dìng jì dìng 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 先例xiān lì xiān lì
Costs Recovery is Standard Practice** When a citizen or political opponent initiates litigation against the government and loses, it is standard practice for costs orders to be made against them [1].
** * ** * 22 2 .. . 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng 追偿zhuī cháng zhuī cháng shì shì 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ ** * ** *
This is not unique to the Coalition and reflects normal legal procedure.
dāng dāng 公民gōng mín gōng mín huò huò 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 对手duì shǒu duì shǒu 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ bìng bìng 败诉bài sù bài sù shí shí 判令pàn lìng pàn lìng 承担费用chéng dān fèi yòng chéng dān fèi yòng shì shì 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The government recovering some costs through Fitzgibbon's costs order is standard administrative practice. **3.
zhè zhè 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu 而是ér shì ér shì 正常zhèng cháng zhèng cháng de de 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 程序chéng xù chéng xù
The "Back-Room Deals" Framing** The claim's reference to "back-room deals" is inflammatory language that overstates what the document contains.
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 通过tōng guò tōng guò 菲茨fēi cí fēi cí 吉本jí běn jí běn de de 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng lìng lìng 收回shōu huí shōu huí 部分bù fèn bù fèn 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng shì shì 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn de de 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ
The Coalition agreement is a formal, documented arrangement between two major parties on how they will share ministerial positions and parliamentary responsibilities.
** * ** * 33 3 .. . "" " 幕后mù hòu mù hòu 交易jiāo yì jiāo yì "" " de de 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù ** * ** *
While Labor argued it should be public, the document is an inter-party agreement, not a secret deal.
gāi gāi 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng zhōng zhōng "" " 幕后mù hòu mù hòu 交易jiāo yì jiāo yì "" " de de 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ shì shì 带有dài yǒu dài yǒu 煽动性shān dòng xìng shān dòng xìng de de 语言yǔ yán yǔ yán 夸大kuā dà kuā dà le le 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn de de 实际shí jì shí jì 内容nèi róng nèi róng
Finance Minister Mathias Cormann confirmed it "goes to how our parties work together in government and opposition", including "the allocation of staff to the National party" and proportion of ministers and opposition spokespeople [1].
联盟lián méng lián méng 协议xié yì xié yì shì shì 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 关于guān yú guān yú 如何rú hé rú hé 分享fēn xiǎng fēn xiǎng 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 职位zhí wèi zhí wèi 议会yì huì yì huì 职责zhí zé zhí zé de de 正式zhèng shì zhèng shì 成文chéng wén chéng wén 安排ān pái ān pái
This is different from claiming it involves undisclosed "back-room deals." **4.
虽然suī rán suī rán 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 应该yīng gāi yīng gāi 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi dàn dàn gāi gāi 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn shì shì 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng jiān jiān de de 协议xié yì xié yì ér ér fēi fēi 秘密mì mì mì mì 交易jiāo yì jiāo yì
FOI Status Determination** The government's classification of the document as party political rather than governmental was tested in court and upheld by the Federal Circuit Court [1].
财政部长cái zhèng bù zhǎng cái zhèng bù zhǎng 马蒂亚mǎ dì yà mǎ dì yà ·· · 科尔曼kē ěr màn kē ěr màn (( ( MathiasMathias Mathias CormannCormann Cormann )) ) 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí "" " 涉及shè jí shè jí 我们wǒ men wǒ men de de 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 如何rú hé rú hé zài zài 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 反对派fǎn duì pài fǎn duì pài zhōng zhōng 合作hé zuò hé zuò "" " 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò "" " wèi wèi 国家guó jiā guó jiā dǎng dǎng 分配fēn pèi fēn pèi 工作人员gōng zuò rén yuán gōng zuò rén yuán "" " 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 反对派fǎn duì pài fǎn duì pài 发言人fā yán rén fā yán rén de de 比例bǐ lì bǐ lì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
This was not an arbitrary decision but one made through formal legal process.
zhè zhè 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 涉及shè jí shè jí 未公开wèi gōng kāi wèi gōng kāi de de "" " 幕后mù hòu mù hòu 交易jiāo yì jiāo yì "" " shì shì 不同bù tóng bù tóng de de
Whether this classification was correct is debatable, but it was judicially reviewed and upheld.
** * ** * 44 4 .. . 信息xìn xī xìn xī 自由zì yóu zì yóu 状态zhuàng tài zhuàng tài 认定rèn dìng rèn dìng ** * ** *
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ jiāng jiāng gāi gāi 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 归类guī lèi guī lèi wèi wèi 政党政治zhèng dǎng zhèng zhì zhèng dǎng zhèng zhì 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn ér ér 非政府fēi zhèng fǔ fēi zhèng fǔ 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn de de 决定jué dìng jué dìng 经过jīng guò jīng guò 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 审查shěn chá shěn chá bìng bìng 获得huò dé huò dé le le 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 巡回xún huí xún huí 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn de de 支持zhī chí zhī chí [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
zhè zhè 不是bú shì bú shì 武断wǔ duàn wǔ duàn de de 决定jué dìng jué dìng 而是ér shì ér shì 通过tōng guò tōng guò 正式zhèng shì zhèng shì 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 程序chéng xù chéng xù 做出zuò chū zuò chū de de
这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 归类guī lèi guī lèi 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 正确zhèng què zhèng què 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ 争论zhēng lùn zhēng lùn dàn dàn 经过jīng guò jīng guò le le 司法sī fǎ sī fǎ 审查shěn chá shěn chá bìng bìng 获得huò dé huò dé 支持zhī chí zhī chí

来源可信度评估

原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán wèi wèi 卫报wèi bào wèi bào 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà bǎn bǎn 这是zhè shì zhè shì 一家yī jiā yī jiā 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 严格yán gé yán gé 编辑biān jí biān jí 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn de de 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 新闻媒体xīn wén méi tǐ xīn wén méi tǐ
The original source is The Guardian Australia, a mainstream news outlet with strong editorial standards.
保罗bǎo luó bǎo luó ·· · 卡普kǎ pǔ kǎ pǔ (( ( PaulPaul Paul KarpKarp Karp )) ) de de 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 报道bào dào bào dào le le 特恩tè ēn tè ēn 布尔bù ěr bù ěr zài zài 议会yì huì yì huì de de 讲话jiǎng huà jiǎng huà 内容nèi róng nèi róng bìng bìng 提供tí gōng tí gōng le le 议会yì huì yì huì 程序chéng xù chéng xù de de 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 引述yǐn shù yǐn shù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The article by Paul Karp accurately reports what Turnbull said in Parliament and provides direct quotes from parliamentary proceedings [1].
报道bào dào bào dào 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 事实性shì shí xìng shì shí xìng 似乎sì hū sì hū wèi wèi duì duì 基本jī běn jī běn 事实shì shí shì shí 添加tiān jiā tiān jiā 显著xiǎn zhù xiǎn zhù de de 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 解读jiě dú jiě dú jǐn jǐn 如实rú shí rú shí 报道bào dào bào dào le le 问答wèn dá wèn dá 环节huán jié huán jié 发生fā shēng fā shēng de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng
The reporting is factual and does not appear to add significant partisan interpretation to the basic facts—it simply reports what occurred during question time.
卫报wèi bào wèi bào 虽然suī rán suī rán 社论shè lùn shè lùn 倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng 偏左piān zuǒ piān zuǒ dàn dàn zài zài 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 事实shì shí shì shí 报道bào dào bào dào 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 保持bǎo chí bǎo chí 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 可信度kě xìn dù kě xìn dù
The Guardian, while left-leaning editorially, maintains journalistic credibility for factual reporting on Australian politics.
文章wén zhāng wén zhāng de de 标题biāo tí biāo tí "" " 8787 87 ,, , 000000 000 澳元ào yuán ào yuán 公款gōng kuǎn gōng kuǎn 用于yòng yú yòng yú 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn "" " duì duì 支出zhī chū zhī chū chí chí 负面fù miàn fù miàn 态度tài dù tài dù dàn dàn 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 描述miáo shù miáo shù le le 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ de de 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng
The article's headline ("$87,000 in public funds spent keeping document secret") frames the spending negatively but accurately characterizes the government's legal action.
副标题fù biāo tí fù biāo tí "" " 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ zài zài 问答wèn dá wèn dá 环节huán jié huán jié 披露pī lù pī lù 数字shù zì shù zì 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 继续jì xù jì xù 抗争kàng zhēng kàng zhēng "" " 同样tóng yàng tóng yàng 符合事实fú hé shì shí fú hé shì shí
The subheading ("Prime minister reveals figure during question time as Labor continues fight") is also factually accurate.
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu céng céng 产生chǎn shēng chǎn shēng 类似lèi sì lèi sì de de 信息xìn xī xìn xī 自由zì yóu zì yóu 诉讼费用sù sòng fèi yòng sù sòng fèi yòng huò huò 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 归类guī lèi guī lèi 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ
**Did Labor engage in similar FOI legal costs or document classifications?** Search results did not yield comprehensive data on Labor's FOI defense costs during their 2007-2013 government.
** * ** *
However, the practice of governments spending money on legal defense in FOI disputes is not unique to the Coalition: - Labor governments (including Rudd and Gillard) also faced FOI disputes and would have incurred legal costs defending government positions on document release [4] - All Australian governments have classified certain documents as party political or cabinet-in-confidence and defended those classifications in court - The issue of coalition agreements and their FOI status predates the Coalition government Without specific parallel data, what can be said is that governments across the political spectrum engage in FOI disputes when they believe documents should remain confidential.
搜索sōu suǒ sōu suǒ 结果jié guǒ jié guǒ wèi wèi 提供tí gōng tí gōng 20072007 2007 -- - 20132013 2013 nián nián 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 期间qī jiān qī jiān 关于guān yú guān yú 信息xìn xī xìn xī 自由zì yóu zì yóu 辩护biàn hù biàn hù 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng de de 全面quán miàn quán miàn 数据shù jù shù jù
The principle that costs are recovered from unsuccessful litigants is standard across all administrations.
然而rán ér rán ér 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ zài zài 信息xìn xī xìn xī 自由zì yóu zì yóu 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì zhōng zhōng 支出zhī chū zhī chū 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu
-- - 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 陆克文lù kè wén lù kè wén 吉拉德jí lā dé jí lā dé 时期shí qī shí qī 面临miàn lín miàn lín 信息xìn xī xìn xī 自由zì yóu zì yóu 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì zài zài 辩护biàn hù biàn hù 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 关于guān yú guān yú 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi de de 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 时会shí huì shí huì 产生chǎn shēng chǎn shēng 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng [[ [ 44 4 ]] ]
-- - 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 澳大利亚政府ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ dōu dōu céng céng jiāng jiāng 某些mǒu xiē mǒu xiē 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 归类guī lèi guī lèi wèi wèi 政党政治zhèng dǎng zhèng zhì zhèng dǎng zhèng zhì huò huò 内阁nèi gé nèi gé 机密文件jī mì wén jiàn jī mì wén jiàn bìng bìng zài zài 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng shàng shàng wèi wèi 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 归类guī lèi guī lèi 辩护biàn hù biàn hù
-- - 联盟lián méng lián méng 协议xié yì xié yì 及其jí qí jí qí 信息xìn xī xìn xī 自由zì yóu zì yóu 状态zhuàng tài zhuàng tài 问题wèn tí wèn tí zài zài 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 之前zhī qián zhī qián jiù jiù 存在cún zài cún zài
由于yóu yú yóu yú 缺乏quē fá quē fá 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 对比duì bǐ duì bǐ 数据shù jù shù jù 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ 明确míng què míng què de de shì shì 政治派别zhèng zhì pài bié zhèng zhì pài bié de de 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ zài zài 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn yīng yīng 保持bǎo chí bǎo chí 机密jī mì jī mì shí shí dōu dōu huì huì 参与cān yù cān yù 信息xìn xī xìn xī 自由zì yóu zì yóu 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì
xiàng xiàng 败诉bài sù bài sù 诉讼sù sòng sù sòng fāng fāng 追偿zhuī cháng zhuī cháng 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng de de 原则yuán zé yuán zé shì shì 各届gè jiè gè jiè 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 通行tōng xíng tōng xíng de de 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ
🌐

平衡视角

** * ** * 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 为何wèi hé wèi hé 辩护biàn hù biàn hù 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì gāi gāi 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn ** * ** *
**Why the Coalition defended keeping the document secret:** The government's position was that the Coalition agreement is fundamentally a party political document—an agreement between two political parties on how they will share power—rather than a government document subject to FOI disclosure [1].
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ de de 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng shì shì 联盟lián méng lián méng 协议xié yì xié yì 本质běn zhì běn zhì shàng shàng shì shì 政党政治zhèng dǎng zhèng zhì zhèng dǎng zhèng zhì 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 关于guān yú guān yú 如何rú hé rú hé 分享fēn xiǎng fēn xiǎng 权力quán lì quán lì de de 协议xié yì xié yì ér ér 非受fēi shòu fēi shòu 信息xìn xī xìn xī 自由zì yóu zì yóu 披露pī lù pī lù de de 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
This is not unreasonable; party-to-party agreements operate in a different sphere from government policy decisions.
zhè zhè 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 不合理bù hé lǐ bù hé lǐ 党际dǎng jì dǎng jì 协议xié yì xié yì 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 决定jué dìng jué dìng 处于chǔ yú chǔ yú 不同bù tóng bù tóng 领域lǐng yù lǐng yù
The Finance Minister's explanation that it covers "how our parties work together" and staff allocation suggests a party management document rather than a government policy paper [1]. **Legitimate criticisms:** Labor argued that because the coalition agreement affects "the running of government" and "goes to how our parties work together in government," it should be considered a government document and thus subject to FOI [1].
财政部长cái zhèng bù zhǎng cái zhèng bù zhǎng de de 解释jiě shì jiě shì 称该chēng gāi chēng gāi 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 涉及shè jí shè jí "" " 我们wǒ men wǒ men de de 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 如何rú hé rú hé 合作hé zuò hé zuò "" " 人员rén yuán rén yuán 配置pèi zhì pèi zhì 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 这是zhè shì zhè shì 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 管理文件guǎn lǐ wén jiàn guǎn lǐ wén jiàn ér ér 非政府fēi zhèng fǔ fēi zhèng fǔ 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
This is a defensible position—if a document materially affects how government operates, transparency arguments have merit.
** * ** * 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ de de 批评pī píng pī píng ** * ** *
Penny Wong argued there was "no basis on which the government can continue to hide this document from the public" [1]. **The broader transparency issue:** The Coalition government's willingness to spend $87,000 in legal fees to keep a single document confidential does raise questions about transparency, though this reflects a real legal/constitutional tension: How much weight should be given to protecting inter-party agreements versus public transparency about how government operates?
工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 辩称biàn chēng biàn chēng 由于yóu yú yóu yú 联盟lián méng lián méng 协议xié yì xié yì 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng "" " 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 运作yùn zuò yùn zuò "" " bìng bìng "" " 涉及shè jí shè jí 我们wǒ men wǒ men de de 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 如何rú hé rú hé zài zài 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ zhōng zhōng 合作hé zuò hé zuò "" " yīng yīng bèi bèi 视为shì wèi shì wèi 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 因而yīn ér yīn ér shòu shòu 信息xìn xī xìn xī 自由zì yóu zì yóu 约束yuē shù yuē shù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
Different democracies resolve this differently. **Honest assessment of the "lying" claim:** The evidence does not support the claim that the Coalition deliberately lied about the cost.
这一zhè yī zhè yī 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng shì shì 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ 辩护biàn hù biàn hù de de 如果rú guǒ rú guǒ 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn duì duì 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 运作yùn zuò yùn zuò 产生chǎn shēng chǎn shēng 实质性shí zhì xìng shí zhì xìng 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 论点lùn diǎn lùn diǎn jiù jiù yǒu yǒu 价值jià zhí jià zhí
Turnbull accurately reported the legal fees.
黄英贤huáng yīng xián huáng yīng xián (( ( PennyPenny Penny WongWong Wong )) ) 辩称biàn chēng biàn chēng "" " 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 继续jì xù jì xù xiàng xiàng 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng 隐瞒yǐn mán yǐn mán 这份zhè fèn zhè fèn 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn de de 依据yī jù yī jù "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The confusion around the costs order appears to stem from Fitzgibbon not being aware a technical costs order had been made against him—which is understandable in complex litigation, but does not constitute the Coalition lying.
** * ** * gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn de de 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 问题wèn tí wèn tí ** * ** *
If anything, this exchange shows normal parliamentary debate where both sides clarified their positions under correction.
联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 愿意yuàn yì yuàn yì 花费huā fèi huā fèi 8787 87 ,, , 000000 000 澳元ào yuán ào yuán 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng lái lái 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì 一份yī fèn yī fèn 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 确实què shí què shí 引发yǐn fā yǐn fā le le 关于guān yú guān yú 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn zhè zhè 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng le le 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí de de 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ // / 宪法xiàn fǎ xiàn fǎ 张力zhāng lì zhāng lì zài zài 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng jiān jiān 协议xié yì xié yì 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng duì duì 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 运作yùn zuò yùn zuò de de 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 之间zhī jiān zhī jiān yīng yīng 如何rú hé rú hé 权衡quán héng quán héng
不同bù tóng bù tóng de de 民主mín zhǔ mín zhǔ 国家guó jiā guó jiā 对此duì cǐ duì cǐ yǒu yǒu 不同bù tóng bù tóng de de 解决方案jiě jué fāng àn jiě jué fāng àn
** * ** * duì duì "" " 撒谎sā huǎng sā huǎng "" " 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng de de 诚实chéng shí chéng shí 评估píng gū píng gū ** * ** *
证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 支持zhī chí zhī chí 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 故意gù yì gù yì jiù jiù 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng 撒谎sā huǎng sā huǎng de de 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng
特恩tè ēn tè ēn 布尔bù ěr bù ěr 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 报告bào gào bào gào le le 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng
围绕wéi rào wéi rào 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng lìng lìng de de 混乱hùn luàn hùn luàn 似乎sì hū sì hū 源于yuán yú yuán yú 菲茨fēi cí fēi cí 吉本jí běn jí běn 了解liǎo jiě liǎo jiě duì duì 作出zuò chū zuò chū 技术性jì shù xìng jì shù xìng 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng lìng lìng zhè zhè zài zài 复杂fù zá fù zá 诉讼sù sòng sù sòng 中是zhōng shì zhōng shì 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ 理解lǐ jiě lǐ jiě de de dàn dàn bìng bìng 构成gòu chéng gòu chéng 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 撒谎sā huǎng sā huǎng
如果rú guǒ rú guǒ 要说yào shuō yào shuō 的话de huà de huà 这次zhè cì zhè cì 交锋jiāo fēng jiāo fēng 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì le le 正常zhèng cháng zhèng cháng de de 议会yì huì yì huì 辩论biàn lùn biàn lùn 双方shuāng fāng shuāng fāng zài zài 更正gēng zhèng gēng zhèng xià xià 澄清chéng qīng chéng qīng le le 各自gè zì gè zì 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng

部分属实

6.0

/ 10

gāi gāi 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng 包含bāo hán bāo hán 核实hé shí hé shí de de 核心hé xīn hé xīn 事实shì shí shì shí 花费huā fèi huā fèi 8787 87 ,, , 000000 000 澳元ào yuán ào yuán 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 辩护biàn hù biàn hù dàn dàn 显著xiǎn zhù xiǎn zhù 夸大kuā dà kuā dà le le "" " 撒谎sā huǎng sā huǎng "" " 成分chéng fèn chéng fèn bìng bìng 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 煽动性shān dòng xìng shān dòng xìng 语言yǔ yán yǔ yán "" " 幕后mù hòu mù hòu 交易jiāo yì jiāo yì "" " lái lái 歪曲wāi qū wāi qū 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn de de 实质shí zhì shí zhì
The claim contains a verified core fact ($87,000 spent on legal defense) but significantly overstates the "lying" component and uses inflammatory language ("back-room deals") that mischaracterizes what the document is.
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 花费huā fèi huā fèi le le 这笔zhè bǐ zhè bǐ 资金zī jīn zī jīn lái lái 捍卫hàn wèi hàn wèi 一份yī fèn yī fèn 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn de de 归类guī lèi guī lèi zhè zhè 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 信息xìn xī xìn xī 自由zì yóu zì yóu 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 原则yuán zé yuán zé shì shì 站得住脚zhàn dé zhù jiǎo zhàn dé zhù jiǎo de de 无论wú lùn wú lùn 正确zhèng què zhèng què 与否yǔ fǒu yǔ fǒu shì shì 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn de de 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng 追偿zhuī cháng zhuī cháng 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ
The government did spend this money defending a document's classification, which is defensible as a FOI legal principle (whether correct or not) and standard cost recovery practice.
撒谎sā huǎng sā huǎng de de 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng 缺乏quē fá quē fá 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 支持zhī chí zhī chí 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 报告bào gào bào gào le le suǒ suǒ 发生fā shēng fā shēng de de 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng
The allegation of lying is not supported by evidence—the government accurately reported the legal costs incurred.

📚 来源与引用 (2)

  1. 1
    theguardian.com

    theguardian.com

    Prime minister reveals figure during question time as Labor continues fight to find out how Liberals and Nationals operate

    the Guardian
  2. 2
    sbs.com.au

    sbs.com.au

    Parliament has heard taxpayers forked out $87,000 in legal costs to keep the coalition agreement a secret.

    SBS News

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。