部分属实

评分: 6.0/10

Coalition
C0248

声明内容

“政府向一家承包商支付了900万澳元,却实际上什么都没做,因为政府突然取消了合同,转而将合同交给了一家经验较少、资质较差的公司。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

根据gēn jù gēn jù 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 媒体报道méi tǐ bào dào méi tǐ bào dào ,, , 这一zhè yī zhè yī 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 的de de 核心hé xīn hé xīn 事实shì shí shì shí ** * ** * 基本jī běn jī běn 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què ** * ** * 。。 。
The core facts of this claim are **substantially accurate** according to mainstream reporting.
《《 《 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 金融jīn róng jīn róng 评论píng lùn píng lùn 报bào bào 》》 》 (( ( AustralianAustralian Australian FinancialFinancial Financial ReviewReview Review )) ) 在zài zài 20192019 2019 年nián nián 33 3 月yuè yuè 报道bào dào bào dào 称chēng chēng ,, , 联邦政府lián bāng zhèng fǔ lián bāng zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 在zài zài 向xiàng xiàng TollToll Toll GroupGroup Group 支付zhī fù zhī fù 了le le 900900 900 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán ,, , 此前cǐ qián cǐ qián abruptlyabruptly abruptly 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 了le le 马努斯mǎ nǔ sī mǎ nǔ sī 岛dǎo dǎo 的de de 一个yí gè yí gè 建筑jiàn zhù jiàn zhù 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The Australian Financial Review reported in March 2019 that the federal government did indeed pay Toll Group $9 million after abruptly cancelling a building project on Manus Island [1].
取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 发生fā shēng fā shēng 在zài zài 20172017 2017 年nián nián 99 9 月yuè yuè 44 4 日rì rì ,, , 当时dāng shí dāng shí 工作人员gōng zuò rén yuán gōng zuò rén yuán 正zhèng zhèng 准备zhǔn bèi zhǔn bèi 前往qián wǎng qián wǎng 马努斯mǎ nǔ sī mǎ nǔ sī 岛dǎo dǎo ,, , 开始kāi shǐ kāi shǐ 在zài zài 东dōng dōng 洛伦luò lún luò lún 高gāo gāo 难民nàn mín nàn mín 过境guò jìng guò jìng 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn (( ( EastEast East LorengauLorengau Lorengau RefugeeRefugee Refugee TransitTransit Transit CentreCentre Centre )) ) 建造jiàn zào jiàn zào 住宿zhù sù zhù sù 设施shè shī shè shī 的de de 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The cancellation occurred on September 4, 2017, when staff were preparing to travel to Manus Island to commence work on accommodation at the East Lorengau Refugee Transit Centre [1].
这zhè zhè 发生fā shēng fā shēng 在zài zài 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 向xiàng xiàng 鲜为人知xiǎn wéi rén zhī xiǎn wéi rén zhī 的de de PaladinPaladin Paladin 集团jí tuán jí tuán 授予shòu yǔ shòu yǔ 价值jià zhí jià zhí 4.234.23 4.23 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 的de de 马努斯mǎ nǔ sī mǎ nǔ sī 岛dǎo dǎo 安全ān quán ān quán 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 合同hé tóng hé tóng 的de de 三周sān zhōu sān zhōu 前qián qián [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
This happened just three weeks before the government awarded the little-known Paladin group a $423 million security contract for Manus Island work [1].
关于guān yú guān yú 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ "" " 将jiāng jiāng 合同hé tóng hé tóng 交给jiāo gěi jiāo gěi 了le le 一家yī jiā yī jiā 经验jīng yàn jīng yàn 较jiào jiào 少shǎo shǎo 、、 、 资质zī zhì zī zhì 较差jiào chà jiào chà 的de de 公司gōng sī gōng sī "" " 的de de 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng ,, , 似乎sì hū sì hū 是shì shì 基于jī yú jī yú PaladinPaladin Paladin 被bèi bèi 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为wèi wèi 一家yī jiā yī jiā "" " 鲜为人知xiǎn wéi rén zhī xiǎn wéi rén zhī 的de de 公司gōng sī gōng sī "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] ,, , 暗示àn shì àn shì 其qí qí 履历lǚ lì lǚ lì 不如bù rú bù rú TollToll Toll GroupGroup Group 丰富fēng fù fēng fù ,, , 而ér ér TollToll Toll GroupGroup Group 是shì shì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 的de de 物流wù liú wù liú 和hé hé 基础设施jī chǔ shè shī jī chǔ shè shī 公司gōng sī gōng sī 。。 。
The claim that the government "gave it to a less experienced and less qualified company" appears to be based on the fact that Paladin was described as a "little-known company" [1], suggesting it had less track record than Toll Group, which is a major Australian logistics and infrastructure company.
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 《《 《 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 金融jīn róng jīn róng 评论píng lùn píng lùn 报bào bào 》》 》 的de de 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 明确míng què míng què 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào 两家liǎng jiā liǎng jiā 公司gōng sī gōng sī 的de de 资质zī zhì zī zhì 或huò huò 经验jīng yàn jīng yàn 水平shuǐ píng shuǐ píng ,, , 也yě yě 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 提供tí gōng tí gōng PaladinPaladin Paladin 先前xiān qián xiān qián 经验jīng yàn jīng yàn 的de de 详细分析xiáng xì fēn xī xiáng xì fēn xī 。。 。
However, the AFR article does not explicitly compare the qualifications or experience levels of the two companies, nor does it provide detailed analysis of Paladin's prior experience.
向xiàng xiàng TollToll Toll GroupGroup Group 支付zhī fù zhī fù 未wèi wèi 开始kāi shǐ kāi shǐ 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 的de de 款项kuǎn xiàng kuǎn xiàng 已yǐ yǐ 得到dé dào dé dào 确认què rèn què rèn —— — —— — 《《 《 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 金融jīn róng jīn róng 评论píng lùn píng lùn 报bào bào 》》 》 将jiāng jiāng 其qí qí 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为wèi wèi "" " 从未cóng wèi cóng wèi 开始kāi shǐ kāi shǐ 的de de 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The payment to Toll Group for unstarted work is confirmed - the AFR described it as "work it never started" [1].
一名yī míng yī míng 参与cān yù cān yù 该gāi gāi 过程guò chéng guò chéng 的de de 人士rén shì rén shì 将jiāng jiāng 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 的de de 决定jué dìng jué dìng 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为wèi wèi "" " bizarrebizarre bizarre "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] ,, , 暗示àn shì àn shì 其qí qí 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 存在cún zài cún zài 问题wèn tí wèn tí 。。 。
One person involved in the process described the decision to cancel the project as "bizarre" [1], suggesting the reasoning was questionable.

缺失背景

然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 如何rú hé rú hé 判断pàn duàn pàn duàn 此事cǐ shì cǐ shì 严重性yán zhòng xìng yán zhòng xìng 的de de 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 细节xì jié xì jié :: :
However, the claim omits several important contextual details that affect how serious this issue should be judged: 1. **Contract provisions for cancellation:** Government contracts typically include termination provisions.
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 合同hé tóng hé tóng 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 条款tiáo kuǎn tiáo kuǎn :: : ** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 合同hé tóng hé tóng 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 包含bāo hán bāo hán 终止zhōng zhǐ zhōng zhǐ 条款tiáo kuǎn tiáo kuǎn 。。 。
The $9 million payment may have been a contractually-required termination fee rather than inappropriate compensation [1].
900900 900 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 的de de 付款fù kuǎn fù kuǎn 可能kě néng kě néng 是shì shì 合同hé tóng hé tóng 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 的de de 终止zhōng zhǐ zhōng zhǐ 费fèi fèi ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 不当bù dàng bù dàng 补偿bǔ cháng bǔ cháng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
Toll Group would have incurred costs preparing for the project (mobilisation, staffing, planning) that justifiably needed to be compensated under standard contract law. 2. **Reason for cancellation:** The AFR article does not explain **why** the government cancelled the Toll contract.
TollToll Toll GroupGroup Group 为wèi wèi 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 准备zhǔn bèi zhǔn bèi 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò (( ( 动员dòng yuán dòng yuán 、、 、 人员rén yuán rén yuán 配置pèi zhì pèi zhì 、、 、 规划guī huà guī huà )) ) 所suǒ suǒ 产生chǎn shēng chǎn shēng 的de de 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng ,, , 根据gēn jù gēn jù 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 合同法hé tóng fǎ hé tóng fǎ 理应lǐ yīng lǐ yīng 得到dé dào dé dào 补偿bǔ cháng bǔ cháng 。。 。
There may have been legitimate operational, security, budgetary, or policy reasons for the cancellation that would provide necessary context.
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 原因yuán yīn yuán yīn :: : ** * ** * 《《 《 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 金融jīn róng jīn róng 评论píng lùn píng lùn 报bào bào 》》 》 的de de 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 解释jiě shì jiě shì ** * ** * 为什么wèi shén me wèi shén me ** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 了le le TollToll Toll 合同hé tóng hé tóng 。。 。
Without understanding the government's reasoning, it's impossible to assess whether this was "bizarre" mismanagement or a necessary course correction. 3. **Paladin comparison lacks substantiation:** While the claim states Paladin was "less experienced and less qualified," the AFR article only describes Paladin as "little-known" [1].
可能kě néng kě néng 存在cún zài cún zài 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 的de de 运营yùn yíng yùn yíng 、、 、 安全ān quán ān quán 、、 、 预算yù suàn yù suàn 或huò huò 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 原因yuán yīn yuán yīn ,, , 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 必要bì yào bì yào 的de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 信息xìn xī xìn xī 有助于yǒu zhù yú yǒu zhù yú 理解lǐ jiě lǐ jiě 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 。。 。
This does not necessarily mean it was less qualified - many successful security contractors operate with lower public profiles.
如果rú guǒ rú guǒ 不bù bù 了解liǎo jiě liǎo jiě 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de reasoningreasoning reasoning ,, , 就jiù jiù 无法wú fǎ wú fǎ 评估píng gū píng gū 这是zhè shì zhè shì "" " bizarrebizarre bizarre "" " 的de de 管理guǎn lǐ guǎn lǐ 不善bù shàn bù shàn 还是hái shì hái shì 必要bì yào bì yào 的de de coursecourse course correctioncorrection correction 。。 。
The AFR does not provide evidence comparing their qualifications or capabilities directly. 4. **Security vs. construction work:** Importantly, Toll Group was contracted to do **building/construction work** (extra accommodation), while Paladin was later awarded a **security services contract** [1].
33 3 .. . ** * ** * PaladinPaladin Paladin 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào 缺乏quē fá quē fá 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 支持zhī chí zhī chí :: : ** * ** * 虽然suī rán suī rán 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 称chēng chēng PaladinPaladin Paladin "" " 经验jīng yàn jīng yàn 较jiào jiào 少shǎo shǎo 、、 、 资质zī zhì zī zhì 较差jiào chà jiào chà "" " ,, , 但dàn dàn 《《 《 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 金融jīn róng jīn róng 评论píng lùn píng lùn 报bào bào 》》 》 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 仅jǐn jǐn 将jiāng jiāng PaladinPaladin Paladin 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为wèi wèi "" " 鲜为人知xiǎn wéi rén zhī xiǎn wéi rén zhī "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
These are fundamentally different types of work requiring different skill sets.
这zhè zhè 不bù bù 一定yí dìng yí dìng 意味着yì wèi zhe yì wèi zhe 资质zī zhì zī zhì 较差jiào chà jiào chà —— — —— — 许多xǔ duō xǔ duō 成功chéng gōng chéng gōng 的de de 安全ān quán ān quán 承包商chéng bāo shāng chéng bāo shāng 以较yǐ jiào yǐ jiào 低dī dī 的de de 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng profileprofile profile 运营yùn yíng yùn yíng 。。 。
The comparison may be misleading - a company could be highly qualified for security work but unsuitable for construction, or vice versa. 5. **Standard government tendering practice:** The article does not discuss whether proper government procurement processes were followed for the Paladin contract, or whether Paladin's bid was competitive.
该报gāi bào gāi bào 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 提供tí gōng tí gōng 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào 其qí qí 资质zī zhì zī zhì 或huò huò 能力néng lì néng lì 的de de 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 。。 。
Without this information, it's unclear if this represents a genuine procurement failure or standard contracting practice.
44 4 .. . ** * ** * 安全ān quán ān quán 与yǔ yǔ 建筑jiàn zhù jiàn zhù 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 的de de 区别qū bié qū bié :: : ** * ** * 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 的de de 是shì shì ,, , TollToll Toll GroupGroup Group 签订qiān dìng qiān dìng 的de de 是shì shì ** * ** * 建筑jiàn zhù jiàn zhù // / 建设jiàn shè jiàn shè 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò ** * ** * (( ( 额外é wài é wài 住宿zhù sù zhù sù 设施shè shī shè shī )) ) 合同hé tóng hé tóng ,, , 而ér ér PaladinPaladin Paladin 后来hòu lái hòu lái 获得huò dé huò dé 的de de 是shì shì ** * ** * 安全ān quán ān quán 服务fú wù fú wù 合同hé tóng hé tóng ** * ** * [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 是shì shì 根本gēn běn gēn běn 不同bù tóng bù tóng 的de de 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 类型lèi xíng lèi xíng ,, , 需要xū yào xū yào 不同bù tóng bù tóng 的de de 技能jì néng jì néng 组合zǔ hé zǔ hé 。。 。
这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào 可能kě néng kě néng 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng —— — —— — 一家yī jiā yī jiā 公司gōng sī gōng sī 可能kě néng kě néng 在zài zài 安全ān quán ān quán 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 资质zī zhì zī zhì 很hěn hěn 高gāo gāo 但dàn dàn 不bù bù 适合shì hé shì hé 建筑jiàn zhù jiàn zhù 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò ,, , 反之亦然fǎn zhī yì rán fǎn zhī yì rán 。。 。
55 5 .. . ** * ** * 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 采购cǎi gòu cǎi gòu 程序chéng xù chéng xù :: : ** * ** * 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn PaladinPaladin Paladin 合同hé tóng hé tóng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 遵循zūn xún zūn xún 了le le 适当shì dàng shì dàng 的de de 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 采购cǎi gòu cǎi gòu 程序chéng xù chéng xù ,, , 也yě yě 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn PaladinPaladin Paladin 的de de 投标tóu biāo tóu biāo 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 竞争力jìng zhēng lì jìng zhēng lì 。。 。
如果rú guǒ rú guǒ 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 信息xìn xī xìn xī ,, , 就jiù jiù 无法wú fǎ wú fǎ 确定què dìng què dìng 这zhè zhè 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 的de de 采购cǎi gòu cǎi gòu 失败shī bài shī bài 还是hái shì hái shì 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 合同hé tóng hé tóng 操作cāo zuò cāo zuò 。。 。

来源可信度评估

原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán 是shì shì 《《 《 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 金融jīn róng jīn róng 评论píng lùn píng lùn 报bào bào 》》 》 (( ( AFRAFR AFR )) ) ,, , 这是zhè shì zhè shì 一家yī jiā yī jiā 由yóu yóu NineNine Nine EntertainmentEntertainment Entertainment CoCo Co .. . 拥有yōng yǒu yōng yǒu 的de de 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 商业shāng yè shāng yè 和hé hé 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 出版物chū bǎn wù chū bǎn wù 。。 。
The original source provided is the Australian Financial Review (AFR), a major mainstream business and news publication owned by Nine Entertainment Co.
AFRAFR AFR 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 被bèi bèi 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 是shì shì 一家yī jiā yī jiā crediblecredible credible newsnews news organisationorganisation organisation ,, , 在zài zài 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 和hé hé 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 问题wèn tí wèn tí 的de de 调查diào chá diào chá 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 强大qiáng dà qiáng dà 的de de 能力néng lì néng lì 。。 。
The AFR is generally considered a credible news organisation with strong investigative journalism capabilities, particularly on government spending and policy issues.
该gāi gāi 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 由yóu yóu LisaLisa Lisa MurrayMurray Murray 、、 、 AngusAngus Angus GriggGrigg Grigg 和hé hé JonathanJonathan Jonathan ShapiroShapiro Shapiro 共同gòng tóng gòng tóng 撰写zhuàn xiě zhuàn xiě —— — —— — 他们tā men tā men 是shì shì AFRAFR AFR 的de de establishedestablished established journalistsjournalists journalists [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The article was co-authored by Lisa Murray, Angus Grigg, and Jonathan Shapiro - established AFR journalists [1].
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 应yīng yīng 注意zhù yì zhù yì 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 的de de framingframing framing :: : 标题biāo tí biāo tí "" " TollToll Toll paidpaid paid $$ $ 9m9m 9m toto to dodo do nothingnothing nothing "" " 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 了le le 在zài zài 调查diào chá diào chá 解释jiě shì jiě shì 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 之前zhī qián zhī qián 就jiù jiù prepre pre -- - judgesjudges judges 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 为wèi wèi 浪费làng fèi làng fèi 性xìng xìng 的de de chargedcharged charged languagelanguage language 。。 。
However, the article's framing should be noted: The headline "Toll paid $9m to do nothing" uses charged language that pre-judges the situation as wasteful, before the investigation explains the circumstances.
将jiāng jiāng PaladinPaladin Paladin 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为wèi wèi "" " 鲜为人知xiǎn wéi rén zhī xiǎn wéi rén zhī "" " 包含bāo hán bāo hán 了le le unknownunknown unknown equalsequals equals unqualifiedunqualified unqualified 的de de implicitimplicit implicit judgementjudgement judgement 。。 。
The description of Paladin as "little-known" contains an implicit judgement that unknown equals unqualified.
这些zhè xiē zhè xiē framingframing framing choiceschoices choices 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 了le le editorialeditorial editorial perspectiveperspective perspective ,, , 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 关于guān yú guān yú 付款fù kuǎn fù kuǎn 和hé hé timingtiming timing 的de de underlyingunderlying underlying factsfacts facts 似乎sì hū sì hū 是shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de 。。 。
These framing choices reflect editorial perspective, though the underlying facts about payments and timing appear accurate.
AFRAFR AFR 不是bú shì bú shì 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 出版物chū bǎn wù chū bǎn wù ,, , 但dàn dàn 确实què shí què shí 对duì duì 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 支出zhī chū zhī chū 保持bǎo chí bǎo chí investigativeinvestigative investigative stancestance stance 。。 。
The AFR is not a partisan publication, but it does maintain an investigative stance toward government spending generally.
对于duì yú duì yú 这个zhè ge zhè ge 故事gù shì gù shì ,, , framingframing framing 强调qiáng diào qiáng diào 了le le 负面fù miàn fù miàn 因素yīn sù yīn sù (( ( 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 的de de 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 、、 、 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 的de de 付款fù kuǎn fù kuǎn )) ) ,, , 而ér ér 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu extensivelyextensively extensively exploringexploring exploring 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 或huò huò 决策jué cè jué cè 原因yuán yīn yuán yīn 。。 。
For this story, the framing emphasises the negative (cancelled project, payment for no work) without extensively exploring the government's justification or reasons for the decision.
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做过zuò guò zuò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng ?? ?
**Did Labor do something similar?** Search conducted: "Labor government detention centre contractor cancellation payments", "Labor government Manus Island immigration detention spending", "Labor government controversial contractor payments" Finding: While searches did not return specific parallel examples of Labor paying for cancelled Manus Island contracts, Labor's detention centre contractor history includes significant issues with Serco and G4S [2].
** * ** *
Australia recently ditched a $4.6 billion detention contract with Serco after 15 years of operation, citing ongoing concerns about contractor performance [2].
搜索sōu suǒ sōu suǒ conductedconducted conducted :: : "" " LaborLabor Labor governmentgovernment government detentiondetention detention centrecentre centre contractorcontractor contractor cancellationcancellation cancellation paymentspayments payments "" " ,, , "" " LaborLabor Labor governmentgovernment government ManMan Man 努nǔ nǔ 斯岛sī dǎo sī dǎo immigrationimmigration immigration detentiondetention detention spendingspending spending "" " ,, , "" " LaborLabor Labor governmentgovernment government controversialcontroversial controversial contractorcontractor contractor paymentspayments payments "" "
Under Labor's previous detention centre arrangements, both Serco and G4S operated immigration detention facilities and faced multiple scandals and complaints [2].
发现fā xiàn fā xiàn :: : 虽然suī rán suī rán 搜索sōu suǒ sōu suǒ 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 返回fǎn huí fǎn huí 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 支付zhī fù zhī fù 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 马努斯mǎ nǔ sī mǎ nǔ sī 岛dǎo dǎo 合同hé tóng hé tóng 的de de 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ parallelparallel parallel 例子lì zi lì zi ,, , 但dàn dàn 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 的de de detentiondetention detention centrecentre centre 承包商chéng bāo shāng chéng bāo shāng 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 与yǔ yǔ SercoSerco Serco 和hé hé G4SG4S G4S 的de de 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 问题wèn tí wèn tí [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
This indicates that both major Australian parties have struggled with detention centre contractor management and spending - this is not unique to the Coalition.
澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 最近zuì jìn zuì jìn 在zài zài 与yǔ yǔ SercoSerco Serco 签订qiān dìng qiān dìng 了le le 1515 15 年nián nián 运营yùn yíng yùn yíng 合同hé tóng hé tóng 后hòu hòu ,, , 放弃fàng qì fàng qì 了le le 价值jià zhí jià zhí 4646 46 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 的de de detentiondetention detention 合同hé tóng hé tóng ,, , 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 是shì shì ongoingongoing ongoing concernsconcerns concerns aboutabout about contractorcontractor contractor performanceperformance performance [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
Labor inherited the Manus Island detention system from the Coalition, then expanded it, then criticised it when returned to government.
在zài zài 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 之前zhī qián zhī qián 的de de detentiondetention detention centrecentre centre 安排ān pái ān pái 下xià xià ,, , SercoSerco Serco 和hé hé G4SG4S G4S 都dōu dōu 运营yùn yíng yùn yíng immigrationimmigration immigration detentiondetention detention facilitiesfacilities facilities 并bìng bìng 面临miàn lín miàn lín multiplemultiple multiple scandalsscandals scandals andand and complaintscomplaints complaints [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
Both parties have had ongoing issues with contractor performance and government spending on detention facilities. **Contractor cancellation and overpayment** is a known challenge in government procurement across parties.
这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 两大liǎng dà liǎng dà 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 都dōu dōu 在zài zài detentiondetention detention centrecentre centre 承包商chéng bāo shāng chéng bāo shāng 管理guǎn lǐ guǎn lǐ 和hé hé 支出zhī chū zhī chū 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 遇到困难yù dào kùn nán yù dào kùn nán —— — —— — 这zhè zhè 不是bú shì bú shì 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu 的de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí 。。 。
The key difference may be whether proper processes were followed and whether the payment represented reasonable contract termination costs versus genuinely wasteful overpayment.
工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 从cóng cóng 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 继承jì chéng jì chéng 了le le 马努斯mǎ nǔ sī mǎ nǔ sī 岛dǎo dǎo detentiondetention detention 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng ,, , 然后rán hòu rán hòu 将jiāng jiāng 其qí qí 扩展kuò zhǎn kuò zhǎn ,, , 然后rán hòu rán hòu 在zài zài 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 时shí shí 批评pī píng pī píng 它tā tā 。。 。
两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 都dōu dōu 在zài zài detentiondetention detention facilitiesfacilities facilities 的de de 承包商chéng bāo shāng chéng bāo shāng 绩效jì xiào jì xiào 和hé hé 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 支出zhī chū zhī chū 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 存在cún zài cún zài ongoingongoing ongoing issuesissues issues 。。 。
** * ** * 承包商chéng bāo shāng chéng bāo shāng 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 和hé hé overpaymentoverpayment overpayment ** * ** * 是shì shì 跨kuà kuà 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 的de de 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 采购cǎi gòu cǎi gòu knownknown known challengechallenge challenge 。。 。
关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 的de de 区别qū bié qū bié 可能kě néng kě néng 在于zài yú zài yú 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 遵循zūn xún zūn xún 了le le 适当shì dàng shì dàng 的de de 程序chéng xù chéng xù ,, , 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 付款fù kuǎn fù kuǎn 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 的de de 是shì shì 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 的de de 合同hé tóng hé tóng 终止zhōng zhǐ zhōng zhǐ 成本chéng běn chéng běn 还是hái shì hái shì genuinelygenuinely genuinely wastefulwasteful wasteful overpaymentoverpayment overpayment 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

虽然suī rán suī rán 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 强调qiáng diào qiáng diào 了le le 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 为wèi wèi 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 支付zhī fù zhī fù 900900 900 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 的de de genuinegenuine genuine expenditureexpenditure expenditure ,, , 但dàn dàn 有yǒu yǒu 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn 提供tí gōng tí gōng 了le le 必要bì yào bì yào 的de de 平衡píng héng píng héng :: :
While the claim highlights a genuine government expenditure of $9 million for cancelled work, several important points provide necessary balance: **Why this may have been problematic:** The sudden cancellation just as work was about to commence suggests the decision-making process may have been hasty or inadequately planned [1].
** * ** * 为什么wèi shén me wèi shén me 这zhè zhè 可能kě néng kě néng 是shì shì 有yǒu yǒu 问题wèn tí wèn tí 的de de :: : ** * ** *
The fact that a new $423 million contract was awarded to a less-established company three weeks later raises questions about whether the original decision was based on operational need or other factors [1].
就jiù jiù 在zài zài 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 即将jí jiāng jí jiāng 开始kāi shǐ kāi shǐ 时shí shí 的de de 突然tū rán tū rán 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 决策jué cè jué cè 过程guò chéng guò chéng 可能kě néng kě néng 仓促cāng cù cāng cù 或huò huò 规划guī huà guī huà 不足bù zú bù zú [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The description of the decision as "bizarre" by someone involved suggests inside scepticism about the reasoning [1]. **Why this may have been legitimate:** Government infrastructure and detention projects frequently require scope changes, budget adjustments, or operational reassessments [1].
三周sān zhōu sān zhōu 后hòu hòu 向xiàng xiàng 一家yī jiā yī jiā 较jiào jiào 新xīn xīn 的de de 公司gōng sī gōng sī 授予shòu yǔ shòu yǔ 价值jià zhí jià zhí 4.234.23 4.23 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 新xīn xīn 合同hé tóng hé tóng 的de de 事实shì shí shì shí 引发yǐn fā yǐn fā 了le le 疑问yí wèn yí wèn ,, , 即jí jí originaloriginal original 决策jué cè jué cè 是shì shì 基于jī yú jī yú 运营yùn yíng yùn yíng 需求xū qiú xū qiú 还是hái shì hái shì 其他qí tā qí tā 因素yīn sù yīn sù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
If the government identified that alternative security arrangements (Paladin's contracted services) were better suited to the facility's needs than additional accommodation, cancelling the Toll contract might represent a legitimate reprioritisation.
一名yī míng yī míng 参与cān yù cān yù 人员rén yuán rén yuán 将jiāng jiāng 该gāi gāi 决定jué dìng jué dìng 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为wèi wèi "" " bizarrebizarre bizarre "" " 暗示àn shì àn shì 了le le 内部nèi bù nèi bù 对duì duì reasoningreasoning reasoning 的de de 怀疑huái yí huái yí [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
Paying Toll Group for their pre-mobilisation costs and contract termination is standard business practice, not necessarily wasteful spending. **The actual issue:** The real concern here is lack of transparency about the decision-making process.
** * ** * 为什么wèi shén me wèi shén me 这zhè zhè 可能kě néng kě néng 是shì shì 合法hé fǎ hé fǎ 的de de :: : ** * ** *
Did the government: - Conduct proper cost-benefit analysis of the change? - Consider whether the Toll contract could have been modified rather than cancelled? - Follow competitive procurement processes for the Paladin award? - Document the operational rationale for choosing Paladin's security services over additional accommodation?
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 基础设施jī chǔ shè shī jī chǔ shè shī 和hé hé detentiondetention detention 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 经常jīng cháng jīng cháng 需要xū yào xū yào scopescope scope changeschanges changes ,, , budgetbudget budget adjustmentsadjustments adjustments ,, , oror or operationaloperational operational reassessmentsreassessments reassessments [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
Without answers to these questions, it's impossible to determine if this was wasteful mismanagement or a legitimate strategic adjustment with contractually-appropriate costs. **Comparative context:** Both Coalition and Labor governments have struggled with detention centre contractor management, suggesting this may reflect broader systemic issues in government procurement for sensitive facilities rather than unique Coalition incompetence.
如果rú guǒ rú guǒ 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 认定rèn dìng rèn dìng 替代性tì dài xìng tì dài xìng 安全ān quán ān quán 安排ān pái ān pái (( ( PaladinPaladin Paladin 的de de 合同hé tóng hé tóng 服务fú wù fú wù )) ) 比bǐ bǐ 额外é wài é wài 住宿zhù sù zhù sù 设施shè shī shè shī 更gèng gèng 适合shì hé shì hé facilityfacility facility 的de de 需求xū qiú xū qiú ,, , 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo TollToll Toll 合同hé tóng hé tóng 可能kě néng kě néng 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 合法hé fǎ hé fǎ 的de de 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn prioritisationprioritisation prioritisation 。。 。
However, the specific facts of this case (sudden cancellation, large payment, quick replacement with less-established contractor) do warrant scrutiny regardless of party.
向xiàng xiàng TollToll Toll GroupGroup Group 支付zhī fù zhī fù 其qí qí prepre pre -- - mobilisationmobilisation mobilisation 成本chéng běn chéng běn 和hé hé 合同hé tóng hé tóng 终止zhōng zhǐ zhōng zhǐ 费是fèi shì fèi shì 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 商业shāng yè shāng yè 操作cāo zuò cāo zuò ,, , 不bù bù 一定yí dìng yí dìng 是shì shì 浪费làng fèi làng fèi 性支出xìng zhī chū xìng zhī chū 。。 。
** * ** * 实际shí jì shí jì 问题wèn tí wèn tí :: : ** * ** * 这里zhè lǐ zhè lǐ 的de de 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng concernconcern concern 是shì shì 关于guān yú guān yú 决策jué cè jué cè 过程guò chéng guò chéng 缺乏quē fá quē fá 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 。。 。
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu :: :
-- - 对duì duì 变更biàn gēng biàn gēng 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 了le le 适当shì dàng shì dàng 的de de costcost cost -- - benefitbenefit benefit analysisanalysis analysis ?? ?
-- - 考虑kǎo lǜ kǎo lǜ 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi TollToll Toll 合同hé tóng hé tóng 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo ?? ?
-- - 为wèi wèi PaladinPaladin Paladin 的de de 授予shòu yǔ shòu yǔ 遵循zūn xún zūn xún 了le le competitivecompetitive competitive procurementprocurement procurement processesprocesses processes ?? ?
-- - 记录jì lù jì lù 了le le 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé PaladinPaladin Paladin 安全ān quán ān quán 服务fú wù fú wù 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 额外é wài é wài 住宿zhù sù zhù sù 设施shè shī shè shī 的de de 运营yùn yíng yùn yíng 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu ?? ?
如果rú guǒ rú guǒ 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 问题wèn tí wèn tí 的de de 答案dá àn dá àn ,, , 就jiù jiù 无法wú fǎ wú fǎ 确定què dìng què dìng 这是zhè shì zhè shì 浪费làng fèi làng fèi 性xìng xìng 管理guǎn lǐ guǎn lǐ 不善bù shàn bù shàn 还是hái shì hái shì 合法hé fǎ hé fǎ 的de de strategicstrategic strategic adjustmentadjustment adjustment withwith with contractuallycontractually contractually -- - appropriateappropriate appropriate costscosts costs 。。 。
** * ** * 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng :: : ** * ** * 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 和hé hé 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 都dōu dōu 在zài zài detentiondetention detention centrecentre centre 承包商chéng bāo shāng chéng bāo shāng 管理guǎn lǐ guǎn lǐ 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 遇到困难yù dào kùn nán yù dào kùn nán ,, , 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 这zhè zhè 可能kě néng kě néng 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 的de de 是shì shì 敏感mǐn gǎn mǐn gǎn 设施shè shī shè shī 的de de 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 采购cǎi gòu cǎi gòu broaderbroader broader systemicsystemic systemic issuesissues issues ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu 的de de incompetenceincompetence incompetence 。。 。
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 此案cǐ àn cǐ àn 的de de specificspecific specific factsfacts facts (( ( 突然tū rán tū rán 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 、、 、 大额dà é dà é 付款fù kuǎn fù kuǎn 、、 、 quickquick quick replacementreplacement replacement withwith with lessless less -- - establishedestablished established contractorcontractor contractor )) ) 无论wú lùn wú lùn 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 如何rú hé rú hé 都dōu dōu 值得zhí de zhí de scrutinyscrutiny scrutiny 。。 。

部分属实

6.0

/ 10

关于guān yú guān yú 900900 900 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 付款fù kuǎn fù kuǎn 和hé hé 合同hé tóng hé tóng 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 的de de 事实shì shí shì shí 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 是shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de ,, , 且qiě qiě 有yǒu yǒu 可信kě xìn kě xìn 的de de 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 新闻来源xīn wén lái yuán xīn wén lái yuán 报道bào dào bào dào 。。 。
The factual claims about the $9 million payment and contract cancellation are accurate and reported by a credible mainstream news source.
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 将jiāng jiāng 此cǐ cǐ 定性dìng xìng dìng xìng 为wèi wèi "" " 为wèi wèi 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 什么shén me shén me 都dōu dōu 没méi méi 做zuò zuò 的de de 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 付费fù fèi fù fèi "" " 过于guò yú guò yú 简化jiǎn huà jiǎn huà 了le le 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 。。 。
However, the claim's characterisation of this as simply "paid for work it did literally nothing" oversimplifies the situation.
900900 900 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 可能kě néng kě néng 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 的de de 是shì shì 合法hé fǎ hé fǎ 的de de 合同hé tóng hé tóng 终止zhōng zhǐ zhōng zhǐ 成本chéng běn chéng běn ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 纯粹chún cuì chún cuì 的de de 浪费làng fèi làng fèi 性支出xìng zhī chū xìng zhī chū ,, , 而且ér qiě ér qiě 将jiāng jiāng PaladinPaladin Paladin 称为chēng wéi chēng wéi "" " 经验jīng yàn jīng yàn 较jiào jiào 少shǎo shǎo 、、 、 资质zī zhì zī zhì 较差jiào chà jiào chà "" " 的de de 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào 也yě yě 未wèi wèi 得到dé dào dé dào 所suǒ suǒ 提供tí gōng tí gōng 来源lái yuán lái yuán 材料cái liào cái liào 的de de 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí 。。 。
The $9 million likely represents legitimate contract termination costs rather than pure wasteful spending, and the comparison to Paladin as "less experienced and less qualified" is not substantiated by the source material provided.
underlyingunderlying underlying 决策jué cè jué cè 可能kě néng kě néng 存在cún zài cún zài 问题wèn tí wèn tí (( ( 暗示àn shì àn shì 规划guī huà guī huà 或huò huò 决策jué cè jué cè 不佳bù jiā bù jiā )) ) ,, , 但dàn dàn 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 缺乏quē fá quē fá 足够zú gòu zú gòu 的de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 来lái lái 证明zhèng míng zhèng míng 这zhè zhè 一点yì diǎn yì diǎn 。。 。
The underlying decision may have been problematic (suggesting poor planning or decision-making), but the claim lacks sufficient context to prove that.
核心hé xīn hé xīn 问题wèn tí wèn tí 似乎sì hū sì hū 是shì shì 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 程序chéng xù chéng xù 和hé hé 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 不足bù zú bù zú ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi outrightoutright outright 欺诈qī zhà qī zhà 或huò huò 浪费làng fèi làng fèi 性xìng xìng overpaymentoverpayment overpayment 。。 。
The core issue appears to be inadequate government process and transparency rather than outright fraud or wasteful overpayment.

📚 来源与引用 (2)

  1. 1
    Toll paid $9m to do nothing after Canberra scrapped the Manus project

    Toll paid $9m to do nothing after Canberra scrapped the Manus project

    Just three weeks before the government engaged little-known company Paladin for $423 million of security work on Manus Island, it cancelled a building project and paid Toll Group $9 million for work it never started.

    Australian Financial Review
  2. 2
    Australia quietly ditches $4.6b detention contract with Serco

    Australia quietly ditches $4.6b detention contract with Serco

    The British multinational will no longer run immigration detention centres, ending a partnership riddled with allegations.

    The Sydney Morning Herald

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。