属实

评分: 7.5/10

Coalition
C0224

声明内容

“停止评估和列入对本地物种的关键威胁。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis

原始来源

事实核查

核心hé xīn hé xīn 声明shēng míng shēng míng 得到dé dào dé dào le le 环境部huán jìng bù huán jìng bù 自己zì jǐ zì jǐ 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù de de 大力支持dà lì zhī chí dà lì zhī chí
The core claim is substantially supported by evidence from the Environment Department's own documents.
根据gēn jù gēn jù 卫报wèi bào wèi bào 基于jī yú jī yú 信息xìn xī xìn xī 自由zì yóu zì yóu 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ de de 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn suǒ suǒ 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng de de 调查diào chá diào chá 联邦政府lián bāng zhèng fǔ lián bāng zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 已经yǐ jīng yǐ jīng 停止tíng zhǐ tíng zhǐ 评估píng gū píng gū 所谓suǒ wèi suǒ wèi de de 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 过程guò chéng guò chéng keykey key threateningthreatening threatening processesprocesses processes 以便yǐ biàn yǐ biàn 根据gēn jù gēn jù 环境保护huán jìng bǎo hù huán jìng bǎo hù 生物shēng wù shēng wù 多样性duō yàng xìng duō yàng xìng 保股bǎo gǔ bǎo gǔ EPBCEPBC EPBC 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 列入liè rù liè rù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
According to the Guardian's investigation based on Freedom of Information documents, the federal government has indeed stopped assessing what are known as "key threatening processes" under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act [1]. **Key Facts:** 1. **Assessment Cessation**: A 2019 briefing document from the Department showed the government has stopped recommending the government's threatened species scientific committee assess new key threatening processes for potential listing [1].
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 事实shì shí shì shí ** * ** *
The department explicitly stated it did not recommend any key threatening processes put forward "as priorities for assessment" [1]. 2. **Resource Constraints as Justification**: The department cited limited resources and argued that key threatening processes have "limited regulatory influence" as reasons for stopping new assessments [1]. 3. **Stalled Assessments**: Of the four threats nominated or identified for potential assessment, none were progressed as priorities.
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 评估píng gū píng gū 停止tíng zhǐ tíng zhǐ ** * ** * 根据gēn jù gēn jù 部门bù mén bù mén 20192019 2019 nián nián de de 一份yī fèn yī fèn 简报jiǎn bào jiǎn bào 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 停止tíng zhǐ tíng zhǐ 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ de de shòu shòu 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 科学kē xué kē xué 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì duì duì xīn xīn de de 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 过程guò chéng guò chéng 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 评估píng gū píng gū 以便yǐ biàn yǐ biàn 可能kě néng kě néng 列入liè rù liè rù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
Two threats that were assessed as "likely to be eligible for listing if they were assessed" were: - Major alterations to the flow of river systems (nominated in 2016, but later removed from the list by then environment minister Josh Frydenberg) [1] - Sarcoptic mange, a disease affecting wombats [1] 4. **Decades-Long Assessment Delays**: The most critical threat currently under assessment – "fire regimes that cause biodiversity decline" – has been on the assessment list since 2008, with its deadline listed as August 2013, yet it remained incomplete 12 years later (as of 2020) [1].
gāi gāi 部门bù mén bù mén 明确míng què míng què 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì jiāng jiāng 任何rèn hé rèn hé 提出tí chū tí chū de de 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 过程guò chéng guò chéng 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 优先yōu xiān yōu xiān 评估píng gū píng gū de de 对象duì xiàng duì xiàng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
Despite being identified in every state of the environment report as a major threat to native wildlife, it had still not been listed [1]. 5. **Limited Recent Listings**: Government data shows that of the 21 listed major threats, only three were listed in the last decade of the EPBC Act, with the most recent listing in 2014 [1]. **Bottom Line on Factuality**: The claim is **TRUE** – the government has definitively stopped assessing and recommending new key threatening processes for listing, with this decision documented in official 2019 briefing papers.
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 资源zī yuán zī yuán 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu ** * ** * 部门bù mén bù mén 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 有限yǒu xiàn yǒu xiàn de de 资源zī yuán zī yuán wèi wèi 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu bìng bìng 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 过程guò chéng guò chéng 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 有限yǒu xiàn yǒu xiàn de de 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 影响力yǐng xiǎng lì yǐng xiǎng lì 因此yīn cǐ yīn cǐ 停止tíng zhǐ tíng zhǐ xīn xīn de de 评估píng gū píng gū [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 受阻shòu zǔ shòu zǔ de de 评估píng gū píng gū ** * ** * zài zài 提名tí míng tí míng huò huò 确定què dìng què dìng de de 四个sì gè sì gè 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 评估píng gū píng gū de de 对象duì xiàng duì xiàng zhōng zhōng 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 一个yí gè yí gè bèi bèi 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 优先yōu xiān yōu xiān 事项shì xiàng shì xiàng 推进tuī jìn tuī jìn
bèi bèi 评估píng gū píng gū wèi wèi 如果rú guǒ rú guǒ 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 评估píng gū píng gū 可能kě néng kě néng 符合fú hé fú hé 列入liè rù liè rù 条件tiáo jiàn tiáo jiàn de de 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 威胁wēi xié wēi xié shì shì
-- - duì duì 河流hé liú hé liú 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng 流量liú liàng liú liàng de de 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 改变gǎi biàn gǎi biàn 20162016 2016 nián nián 提名tí míng tí míng dàn dàn bèi bèi 当时dāng shí dāng shí de de 环境huán jìng huán jìng 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng JoshJosh Josh FrydenbergFrydenberg Frydenberg cóng cóng 名单míng dān míng dān zhōng zhōng 删除shān chú shān chú [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
-- - 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 袋熊dài xióng dài xióng de de zhú zhú 蜡病là bìng là bìng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
44 4 .. . ** * ** * zhǎng zhǎng 数十年shù shí nián shù shí nián de de 评估píng gū píng gū 延误yán wù yán wù ** * ** * 当时dāng shí dāng shí 正在zhèng zài zhèng zài 评估píng gū píng gū de de zuì zuì 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 导致dǎo zhì dǎo zhì 生物shēng wù shēng wù 多样性duō yàng xìng duō yàng xìng 下降xià jiàng xià jiàng de de 火灾huǒ zāi huǒ zāi 状况zhuàng kuàng zhuàng kuàng firefire fire regimesregimes regimes thatthat that causecause cause biodiversitybiodiversity biodiversity declinedecline decline 20082008 2008 nián nián jiù jiù zài zài 评估píng gū píng gū 名单míng dān míng dān shàng shàng 截止jié zhǐ jié zhǐ 日期rì qī rì qī 列为liè wèi liè wèi 20132013 2013 nián nián 88 8 yuè yuè 然而rán ér rán ér dào dào 20202020 2020 nián nián 1212 12 nián nián hòu hòu réng réng wèi wèi 完成wán chéng wán chéng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn zài zài měi měi 一份yī fèn yī fèn 环境huán jìng huán jìng 状况zhuàng kuàng zhuàng kuàng 报告bào gào bào gào zhōng zhōng dōu dōu bèi bèi 确定què dìng què dìng wèi wèi duì duì 本地běn dì běn dì 野生动物yě shēng dòng wù yě shēng dòng wù de de 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 威胁wēi xié wēi xié dàn dàn réng réng wèi wèi bèi bèi 列入liè rù liè rù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
55 5 .. . ** * ** * 有限yǒu xiàn yǒu xiàn de de 近期jìn qī jìn qī 列入liè rù liè rù ** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 数据shù jù shù jù 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì zài zài 2121 21 列入liè rù liè rù de de 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 威胁wēi xié wēi xié zhōng zhōng 只有zhǐ yǒu zhǐ yǒu 三个sān gè sān gè shì shì zài zài EPBCEPBC EPBC 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn de de 最后zuì hòu zuì hòu 十年shí nián shí nián zhōng zhōng 列入liè rù liè rù de de 最近zuì jìn zuì jìn 一次yī cì yī cì 列入liè rù liè rù shì shì zài zài 20142014 2014 nián nián [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
** * ** * 事实shì shí shì shí 核心hé xīn hé xīn 结论jié lùn jié lùn ** * ** * gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng shì shì ** * ** * 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí de de ** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确切què qiè què qiè 停止tíng zhǐ tíng zhǐ 评估píng gū píng gū 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 列入liè rù liè rù xīn xīn de de 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 过程guò chéng guò chéng 这一zhè yī zhè yī 决定jué dìng jué dìng zài zài 官方guān fāng guān fāng 20192019 2019 nián nián de de 简报jiǎn bào jiǎn bào 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn zhōng zhōng bèi bèi 记录jì lù jì lù

缺失背景

gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng zài zài 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què dàn dàn 需要xū yào xū yào 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 信息xìn xī xìn xī lái lái 全面quán miàn quán miàn 了解liǎo jiě liǎo jiě 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng
The claim is factually accurate but requires important contextual information to understand the full picture: 1. **Resource Constraints Were Real**: The government's cited reason – limited resources – was acknowledged as a genuine constraint by the department [1].
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 资源zī yuán zī yuán 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì shì shì 实际shí jì shí jì 存在cún zài cún zài de de ** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng de de 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 有限yǒu xiàn yǒu xiàn de de 资源zī yuán zī yuán bèi bèi 部门bù mén bù mén 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn wèi wèi 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng de de 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
However, the cost of conducting threat assessments appears minimal relative to broader environmental budgets, which industry experts argued made this an "unacceptable excuse" [1]. 2. **Systemic EPBC Act Weaknesses**: The broader context is that the EPBC Act itself has structural weaknesses that made threat listings optional and largely unenforceable [1].
然而rán ér rán ér gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn de de 环境huán jìng huán jìng 预算yù suàn yù suàn 相比xiāng bǐ xiāng bǐ 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 评估píng gū píng gū de de 成本chéng běn chéng běn 看似kàn shì kàn shì 微乎其微wēi hū qí wēi wēi hū qí wēi 行业háng yè háng yè 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 这是zhè shì zhè shì 不可bù kě bù kě 接受jiē shòu jiē shòu de de 借口jiè kǒu jiè kǒu [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
Once a threat is listed, the environment minister can choose whether to adopt a threat abatement plan, making implementation voluntary.
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng EPBCEPBC EPBC 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 弱点ruò diǎn ruò diǎn ** * ** * gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng shì shì EPBCEPBC EPBC 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 本身běn shēn běn shēn 存在cún zài cún zài 结构性jié gòu xìng jié gòu xìng 弱点ruò diǎn ruò diǎn 使得shǐ de shǐ de 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 列入liè rù liè rù 成为chéng wéi chéng wéi 可选项kě xuǎn xiàng kě xuǎn xiàng qiě qiě 基本上jī běn shàng jī běn shàng 无法wú fǎ wú fǎ 执行zhí xíng zhí xíng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
This is not unique to the Coalition – it reflects fundamental law design issues [1]. 3. **Threat Abatement Plans Often Ineffective**: Of the 21 listed major threats, six have no threat abatement plan at all (including land clearing and climate change), and others like fox predation plans are more than a decade old [1].
一旦yí dàn yí dàn 威胁wēi xié wēi xié bèi bèi 列入liè rù liè rù 环境huán jìng huán jìng 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 采纳cǎi nà cǎi nà 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 减缓jiǎn huǎn jiǎn huǎn 计划jì huà jì huà 使得shǐ de shǐ de 执行zhí xíng zhí xíng 成为chéng wéi chéng wéi 自愿zì yuàn zì yuàn 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi
The system lacks enforcement mechanisms to track whether plans are actually implemented [1]. 4. **Labor Left Threats Unaddressed**: While the claim focuses on Coalition non-action, the context shows this is part of a longer-standing institutional failure.
zhè zhè bìng bìng 不是bú shì bú shì CoalitionCoalition Coalition 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu de de 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng le le 基本jī běn jī běn de de 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 设计shè jì shè jì 问题wèn tí wèn tí [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The fire regimes threat nomination dates to 2008 – potentially during or before Labor's 2007-2013 government – and has never been completed [1]. 5. **Limited Regulatory Power**: Key threatening processes, once listed, are not classified as "matters of national environmental significance," meaning the minister is not required to consider them when making decisions about projects under the EPBC Act [1].
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 减缓jiǎn huǎn jiǎn huǎn 计划jì huà jì huà 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 无效wú xiào wú xiào ** * ** * zài zài 2121 21 列入liè rù liè rù de de 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 威胁wēi xié wēi xié zhōng zhōng yǒu yǒu 六个liù gè liù gè 根本gēn běn gēn běn 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 减缓jiǎn huǎn jiǎn huǎn 计划jì huà jì huà 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 土地tǔ dì tǔ dì 清理qīng lǐ qīng lǐ 气候变化qì hòu biàn huà qì hòu biàn huà 其他qí tā qí tā 狐狸hú lí hú lí 捕食bǔ shí bǔ shí 计划jì huà jì huà 已有yǐ yǒu yǐ yǒu 十多年shí duō nián shí duō nián 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
This structural limitation predates the Coalition government. 6. **Expert Recommendations Existed**: The threatened species scientific committee and environmental organizations had provided detailed recommendations through the EPBC Act review process for how to improve the system, but these required legislative change beyond just departmental decision-making [1].
gāi gāi 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng 缺乏quē fá quē fá 跟踪gēn zōng gēn zōng 计划jì huà jì huà 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 实际shí jì shí jì 执行zhí xíng zhí xíng de de 执行zhí xíng zhí xíng 机制jī zhì jī zhì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
44 4 .. . ** * ** * LaborLabor Labor wèi wèi 解决jiě jué jiě jué 威胁wēi xié wēi xié ** * ** * 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn shēng shēng bèi bèi 重点zhòng diǎn zhòng diǎn 关注guān zhù guān zhù CoalitionCoalition Coalition de de 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi dàn dàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì 这是zhè shì zhè shì 一个yí gè yí gè 长期存在cháng qī cún zài cháng qī cún zài de de 制度zhì dù zhì dù 失败shī bài shī bài
火灾huǒ zāi huǒ zāi 状况zhuàng kuàng zhuàng kuàng 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 提名tí míng tí míng 可追溯kě zhuī sù kě zhuī sù dào dào 20082008 2008 nián nián 可能kě néng kě néng shì shì zài zài huò huò 之前zhī qián zhī qián Labor2007Labor2007 Labor2007 -- - 20132013 2013 nián nián 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 期间qī jiān qī jiān qiě qiě 始终shǐ zhōng shǐ zhōng wèi wèi 完成wán chéng wán chéng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
55 5 .. . ** * ** * 有限yǒu xiàn yǒu xiàn de de 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 权力quán lì quán lì ** * ** * 一旦yí dàn yí dàn 列入liè rù liè rù 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 过程guò chéng guò chéng bèi bèi 分类fēn lèi fēn lèi wèi wèi 国家guó jiā guó jiā 环境huán jìng huán jìng 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 事项shì xiàng shì xiàng zhè zhè 意味着yì wèi zhe yì wèi zhe 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng zài zài 根据gēn jù gēn jù EPBCEPBC EPBC 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn duì duì 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 做出zuò chū zuò chū 决定jué dìng jué dìng shí shí 必需bì xū bì xū 考虑kǎo lǜ kǎo lǜ 它们tā men tā men [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
这一zhè yī zhè yī 结构性jié gòu xìng jié gòu xìng 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ gèng gèng zǎo zǎo 存在cún zài cún zài
66 6 .. . ** * ** * 专家建议zhuān jiā jiàn yì zhuān jiā jiàn yì 存在cún zài cún zài ** * ** * shòu shòu 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 科学kē xué kē xué 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 环境huán jìng huán jìng 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 通过tōng guò tōng guò EPBCEPBC EPBC 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 审查shěn chá shěn chá 过程guò chéng guò chéng 提供tí gōng tí gōng le le 如何rú hé rú hé 改进gǎi jìn gǎi jìn 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng de de 详细xiáng xì xiáng xì 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì dàn dàn 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 需要xū yào xū yào 超越chāo yuè chāo yuè 部门bù mén bù mén 决策jué cè jué cè de de 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]

来源可信度评估

** * ** * GuardianGuardian Guardian AustraliaAustralia Australia ** * ** * 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán shì shì 一家yī jiā yī jiā 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 确立què lì què lì de de 信誉xìn yù xìn yù de de 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 机构jī gòu jī gòu
**Guardian Australia**: The original source is a mainstream news organization with established credibility.
GuardianGuardian Guardian AustraliaAustralia Australia shì shì GuardianGuardian Guardian de de 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn GuardianGuardian Guardian shì shì 一家yī jiā yī jiā 受到shòu dào shòu dào 尊重zūn zhòng zūn zhòng de de 国际guó jì guó jì 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 机构jī gòu jī gòu [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The Guardian Australia is part of The Guardian, a respected international news outlet [1].
zhè zhè 篇文章piān wén zhāng piān wén zhāng 基于jī yú jī yú duì duì 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 自己zì jǐ zì jǐ 发布fā bù fā bù de de 信息xìn xī xìn xī 自由zì yóu zì yóu 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn de de 独家dú jiā dú jiā 分析fēn xī fēn xī 使shǐ shǐ zài zài 事实shì shí shì shí 声明shēng míng shēng míng 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 可靠kě kào kě kào [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
This article is based on exclusive analysis of Freedom of Information documents released by the government itself, making it reliable on factual claims [1]. **The Guardian's Prior Environmental Reporting**: The article references a series of investigations dating to 2018 covering EPBC Act failures, including delays in listing species, ineffective funding use, and recovery plan failures [1].
** * ** * GuardianGuardian Guardian 之前zhī qián zhī qián de de 环境huán jìng huán jìng 报道bào dào bào dào ** * ** * gāi gāi 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 提及tí jí tí jí le le cóng cóng 20182018 2018 nián nián 开始kāi shǐ kāi shǐ de de 一系列yī xì liè yī xì liè 调查diào chá diào chá 涵盖hán gài hán gài EPBCEPBC EPBC 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 失败shī bài shī bài de de 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 列入liè rù liè rù 延迟yán chí yán chí 资金zī jīn zī jīn 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 不力bù lì bù lì 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 恢复huī fù huī fù 计划jì huà jì huà 失败shī bài shī bài [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
These investigations established a pattern of environmental oversight issues. **Source Quality of the Investigation**: The reporting includes direct quotes from government briefing documents, the department's own responses to Guardian questions, and testimony from qualified experts including: - Evan Quartermain, Head of Programs at Humane Society International [1] - Andrew Cox, CEO of the Invasive Species Council [1] - James Trezise, Policy Analyst at the Australian Conservation Foundation [1] - Helene Marsh, Chair of the Threatened Species Scientific Committee [1] The Guardian's investigation doesn't rely on partisan claims but on official government documents obtained through FOI and expert analysis.
这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 调查diào chá diào chá 确立què lì què lì le le 环境huán jìng huán jìng 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 问题wèn tí wèn tí de de 模式mó shì mó shì
The article acknowledges the government's stated justifications (resource constraints, prioritization of species over processes) rather than ignoring them [1].
** * ** * 调查diào chá diào chá de de 来源lái yuán lái yuán 质量zhì liàng zhì liàng ** * ** * 报道bào dào bào dào 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò duì duì 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 简报jiǎn bào jiǎn bào 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn de de 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 部门bù mén bù mén duì duì GuardianGuardian Guardian 问题wèn tí wèn tí de de 回应huí yìng huí yìng 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 合格hé gé hé gé 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā de de 证词zhèng cí zhèng cí 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò
-- - 国际guó jì guó jì 动物dòng wù dòng wù 协会xié huì xié huì 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 负责人fù zé rén fù zé rén EvanEvan Evan QuartermainQuartermain Quartermain [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
-- - 入侵rù qīn rù qīn 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 理事会lǐ shì huì lǐ shì huì CEOCEO CEO AndrewAndrew Andrew CoxCox Cox [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
-- - 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 保股bǎo gǔ bǎo gǔ 基金会jī jīn huì jī jīn huì 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 分析师fēn xī shī fēn xī shī JamesJames James TreziseTrezise Trezise [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
-- - shòu shòu 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 科学kē xué kē xué 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 主席zhǔ xí zhǔ xí HeleneHelene Helene MarshMarsh Marsh [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
GuardianGuardian Guardian de de 调查diào chá diào chá 依赖于yī lài yú yī lài yú 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài shēng shēng bèi bèi 而是ér shì ér shì 依赖于yī lài yú yī lài yú 通过tōng guò tōng guò 信息xìn xī xìn xī 自由zì yóu zì yóu 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ de de 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 官方guān fāng guān fāng 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 分析fēn xī fēn xī
文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn le le 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ de de 官方guān fāng guān fāng 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 资源zī yuán zī yuán 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 优先yōu xiān yōu xiān 过程guò chéng guò chéng ér ér fēi fēi 忽略hū lüè hū lüè 它们tā men tā men [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu zuò zuò le le 类似lèi sì lèi sì de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng
**Did Labor do something similar?** The available evidence suggests **Labor's record on threat assessments was similarly weak**, though for different reasons: **Key Evidence from the Guardian Article:** 1. **Long-Standing System Failure**: The fire regimes threat nomination dates to 2008, potentially initiated during Labor's 2007-2013 government [1].
** * ** *
If nominated by Labor, it indicates Labor also did not complete threat assessments efficiently. 2. **No Evidence of Labor Urgency**: The article does not indicate that Labor, during its 2007-2013 period, significantly advanced key threatening process assessments.
可用kě yòng kě yòng de de 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng ** * ** * LaborLabor Labor zài zài 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 评估píng gū píng gū 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn de de 记录jì lù jì lù 同样tóng yàng tóng yàng 薄弱bó ruò bó ruò ** * ** * 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 原因yuán yīn yuán yīn 不同bù tóng bù tóng
The fact that only three threats were listed in the last decade (with the most recent in 2014, just after Labor lost office) suggests the problem predates the Coalition [1]. 3. **Systemic Law Design Issue**: The EPBC Act's optional nature regarding threat abatement plans is legislation enacted in 1999, during previous Liberal governments, but Labor did not fundamentally reform the system during their 2007-2013 period despite similar failings [1]. 4. **Expert Calls for Reform**: The threatened species scientific committee and conservation organizations' calls for legislative reform and greater accountability, referenced in the article, suggest a decades-long institutional problem, not a Coalition-specific issue [1]. **Conclusion on Labor Comparison**: While this article doesn't provide detailed Labor government threat assessment data, it reveals this is a systemic failure built into the EPBC Act's design and institutional constraints, not uniquely a Coalition policy choice.
** * ** * 来自lái zì lái zì GuardianGuardian Guardian 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng de de 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù ** * ** *
The Coalition did formally decide to stop recommending assessments in 2019, but the underlying system failure predates them.
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 长期cháng qī cháng qī de de 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng 失败shī bài shī bài ** * ** * 火灾huǒ zāi huǒ zāi 状况zhuàng kuàng zhuàng kuàng 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 提名tí míng tí míng 可追溯kě zhuī sù kě zhuī sù dào dào 20082008 2008 nián nián 可能kě néng kě néng shì shì zài zài Labor2007Labor2007 Labor2007 -- - 20132013 2013 nián nián 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 期间qī jiān qī jiān huò huò 之前zhī qián zhī qián 提名tí míng tí míng de de [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
如果rú guǒ rú guǒ shì shì yóu yóu LaborLabor Labor 提名tí míng tí míng de de 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng LaborLabor Labor 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 高效gāo xiào gāo xiào 完成wán chéng wán chéng 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 评估píng gū píng gū
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu LaborLabor Labor 紧迫性jǐn pò xìng jǐn pò xìng de de 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù ** * ** * 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng LaborLabor Labor zài zài 20072007 2007 -- - 20132013 2013 nián nián 期间qī jiān qī jiān 大幅dà fú dà fú 推进tuī jìn tuī jìn le le 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 过程guò chéng guò chéng de de 评估píng gū píng gū
只有zhǐ yǒu zhǐ yǒu 三个sān gè sān gè 威胁wēi xié wēi xié shì shì zài zài 最后zuì hòu zuì hòu 十年shí nián shí nián 列入liè rù liè rù de de 最近zuì jìn zuì jìn 一次yī cì yī cì shì shì zài zài 20142014 2014 nián nián LaborLabor Labor 下台xià tái xià tái 之后zhī hòu zhī hòu 这一zhè yī zhè yī 事实shì shí shì shí 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 问题wèn tí wèn tí CoalitionCoalition Coalition 更早gèng zǎo gèng zǎo 存在cún zài cún zài [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng de de 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 设计shè jì shè jì 问题wèn tí wèn tí ** * ** * EPBCEPBC EPBC 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 关于guān yú guān yú 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 减缓jiǎn huǎn jiǎn huǎn 计划jì huà jì huà de de 可选性kě xuǎn xìng kě xuǎn xìng shì shì zài zài 19991999 1999 nián nián 预布yù bù yù bù de de 法规fǎ guī fǎ guī 当时dāng shí dāng shí shì shì 前任qián rèn qián rèn 自由党zì yóu dǎng zì yóu dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ dàn dàn LaborLabor Labor kuài kuài 20072007 2007 -- - 20132013 2013 nián nián 期间qī jiān qī jiān bìng bìng 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 彻底chè dǐ chè dǐ 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 这一zhè yī zhè yī 制度zhì dù zhì dù 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 存在cún zài cún zài 类似lèi sì lèi sì de de 失败shī bài shī bài [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
44 4 .. . ** * ** * 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 呼吁hū yù hū yù 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé ** * ** * shòu shòu 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 科学kē xué kē xué 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 保股bǎo gǔ bǎo gǔ 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī duì duì 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé gèng gèng gāo gāo 责任制zé rèn zhì zé rèn zhì de de 呼吁hū yù hū yù 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 这是zhè shì zhè shì 一个yí gè yí gè zhǎng zhǎng 几十年jǐ shí nián jǐ shí nián de de 制度zhì dù zhì dù 问题wèn tí wèn tí ér ér fēi fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 特有tè yǒu tè yǒu de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
** * ** * 关于guān yú guān yú LaborLabor Labor 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào de de 结论jié lùn jié lùn ** * ** * 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn zhè zhè 篇文章piān wén zhāng piān wén zhāng 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 提供tí gōng tí gōng 关于guān yú guān yú LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 评估píng gū píng gū de de 详细xiáng xì xiáng xì 数据shù jù shù jù dàn dàn 揭示jiē shì jiē shì le le zhè zhè shì shì 一个yí gè yí gè nèi nèi 置于zhì yú zhì yú EPBCEPBC EPBC 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 设计shè jì shè jì 制度zhì dù zhì dù 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì de de 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 失败shī bài shī bài ér ér fēi fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé
CoalitionCoalition Coalition 确实què shí què shí zài zài 20192019 2019 nián nián 正式zhèng shì zhèng shì 决定jué dìng jué dìng 停止tíng zhǐ tíng zhǐ 推荐tuī jiàn tuī jiàn 评估píng gū píng gū dàn dàn 潜在qián zài qián zài de de 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng 失败shī bài shī bài zǎo zǎo 他们tā men tā men 存在cún zài cún zài
🌐

平衡视角

** * ** * 批评pī píng pī píng 意见yì jiàn yì jiàn shēng shēng bèi bèi 强调qiáng diào qiáng diào de de ** * ** *
**The Criticism (What the Claim Emphasizes):** The Coalition government made an explicit policy decision to stop pursuing new key threatening process assessments [1].
CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 做出zuò chū zuò chū le le 明确míng què míng què de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 决定jué dìng jué dìng 停止tíng zhǐ tíng zhǐ 追求zhuī qiú zhuī qiú xīn xīn de de 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 过程guò chéng guò chéng 评估píng gū píng gū [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
This is indefensible from a conservation perspective because: 1. **Threats Are Critical to Prevention**: Identifying and addressing threats is foundational to species conservation [1].
cóng cóng 保股bǎo gǔ bǎo gǔ 角度jiǎo dù jiǎo dù 来看lái kàn lái kàn 这是zhè shì zhè shì 不可bù kě bù kě 接受jiē shòu jiē shòu de de 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi
Without listing and assessing threats, recovery planning is essentially impossible. 2. **Available Information Went Unused**: The department had identified at least two threats as "likely to be eligible for listing if assessed" but chose not to conduct the assessments [1]. 3. **Expert Consensus Against This**: Organizations including Humane Society International, the Invasive Species Council, the Australian Conservation Foundation, and the Threatened Species Scientific Committee all opposed the decision and called for a unified national approach to threat assessment [1]. 4. **Budget Excuse Was Insufficient**: Evan Quartermain from Humane Society International characterized the resource limitation as "an unacceptable excuse, particularly given the relatively paltry budget needed to undertake these assessments" [1]. 5. **Real Species Impact**: Andrew Cox, CEO of the Invasive Species Council, stated: "If you want an evidenced-based system, you need to list your threats and you need to act on those threats.
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 威胁wēi xié wēi xié duì duì 预防yù fáng yù fáng 至关重要zhì guān zhòng yào zhì guān zhòng yào ** * ** * 识别shí bié shí bié 解决jiě jué jiě jué 威胁wēi xié wēi xié shì shì 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 保股bǎo gǔ bǎo gǔ de de 基础jī chǔ jī chǔ [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
We're not looking deeply at what's causing declines and tackling the declines at the source" [1]. **The Government's Defense (What the Claim Omits):** 1. **Resource Allocation Rationale**: The government argued it chose to prioritize assessment of "species and ecological communities (including those listed in states and territories but not under the EPBC Act)" as "a higher priority" [1].
如果rú guǒ rú guǒ 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 威胁wēi xié wēi xié de de 列入liè rù liè rù 评估píng gū píng gū 恢复huī fù huī fù 规划guī huà guī huà 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng shì shì 可能kě néng kě néng de de
This was a deliberate prioritization choice, not indifference. 2. **Systemic Limitations Are Real**: The EPBC Act's design made threat listings optional and largely unenforced.
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 可用kě yòng kě yòng 信息xìn xī xìn xī wèi wèi bèi bèi 利用lì yòng lì yòng ** * ** * 部门bù mén bù mén 确定què dìng què dìng 至少zhì shǎo zhì shǎo yǒu yǒu 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 如果rú guǒ rú guǒ 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 评估píng gū píng gū 可能kě néng kě néng 符合fú hé fú hé 列入liè rù liè rù 条件tiáo jiàn tiáo jiàn dàn dàn 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 评估píng gū píng gū [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
Key threatening processes are not "matters of national environmental significance," so listing them doesn't legally compel the minister's consideration [1].
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 共识gòng shí gòng shí 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 这一zhè yī zhè yī 决定jué dìng jué dìng ** * ** * 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 国际guó jì guó jì 动物dòng wù dòng wù 协会xié huì xié huì 入侵rù qīn rù qīn 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 理事会lǐ shì huì lǐ shì huì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 保股bǎo gǔ bǎo gǔ 基金会jī jīn huì jī jīn huì shòu shòu 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 科学kē xué kē xué 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 在内zài nèi zài nèi de de 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī dōu dōu 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 这一zhè yī zhè yī 决定jué dìng jué dìng bìng bìng 呼吁hū yù hū yù 采用cǎi yòng cǎi yòng 统一tǒng yī tǒng yī de de 全国quán guó quán guó 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 评估píng gū píng gū 方法fāng fǎ fāng fǎ [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
This limitation exists regardless of government. 3. **Some Threat Plans Showed Success**: The article itself notes exceptions where listing threats and developing plans had demonstrated success, including: - Work to reduce feral cat populations [1] - Reduction of seabird bycatch in long-line fishing operations [1] 4. **Broader Policy Approach**: The government addressed some threats (like climate change) through other policy mechanisms rather than through EPBC threat listing frameworks [1]. 5. **Previous Non-Compliance**: The system's dysfunction predates the Coalition.
44 4 .. . ** * ** * 预算yù suàn yù suàn 借口jiè kǒu jiè kǒu 充分chōng fèn chōng fèn ** * ** * 国际guó jì guó jì 动物dòng wù dòng wù 协会xié huì xié huì de de EvanEvan Evan QuartermainQuartermain Quartermain jiāng jiāng 资源zī yuán zī yuán 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 形容xíng róng xíng róng wèi wèi 不可bù kě bù kě 接受jiē shòu jiē shòu de de 借口jiè kǒu jiè kǒu 尤其yóu qí yóu qí shì shì 考虑kǎo lǜ kǎo lǜ dào dào 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 评估所píng gū suǒ píng gū suǒ de de 相对xiāng duì xiāng duì 微薄wēi bó wēi bó 预算yù suàn yù suàn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The fire regimes assessment languishing since 2008, the last threat listing in 2014 (before Coalition focus period), and the decades-old recovery plans suggest institutional inertia across governments [1]. **Institutional Context – A "Broken System":** Andrew Cox's assessment that "the system's broken" and "dysfunctional" is apt [1].
55 5 .. . ** * ** * 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí de de 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng ** * ** * 入侵rù qīn rù qīn 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 理事会lǐ shì huì lǐ shì huì de de CEOCEO CEO AndrewAndrew Andrew CoxCox Cox 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 如果rú guǒ rú guǒ 想要xiǎng yào xiǎng yào 一个yí gè yí gè 基于jī yú jī yú 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù de de 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng 需要xū yào xū yào 列出liè chū liè chū de de 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 并且bìng qiě bìng qiě duì duì 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 采取行动cǎi qǔ xíng dòng cǎi qǔ xíng dòng
The problems identified include: - Optional establishment of threat abatement plans [1] - Optional implementation of those plans once established [1] - No system to track whether plans are being followed [1] - Insufficient resources allocated regardless of government [1] - Threat listings not constituting matters requiring ministerial consideration [1] The Coalition government's 2019 decision to stop recommending threat assessments is a symptom of this broken system, not the root cause.
我们wǒ men wǒ men 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 深入研究shēn rù yán jiū shēn rù yán jiū 什么shén me shén me 导致dǎo zhì dǎo zhì 数量shù liàng shù liàng 下降xià jiàng xià jiàng 并且bìng qiě bìng qiě zài zài 源头yuán tóu yuán tóu 解决jiě jué jiě jué 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 下降xià jiàng xià jiàng 问题wèn tí wèn tí [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
However, it is also an active choice to stop trying to fix it through the available mechanisms.
** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ de de 辩护biàn hù biàn hù shēng shēng bèi bèi 省略shěng lüè shěng lüè de de ** * ** *
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 资源配置zī yuán pèi zhì zī yuán pèi zhì 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu ** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 辩称biàn chēng biàn chēng 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 优先yōu xiān yōu xiān 评估píng gū píng gū 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 生态shēng tài shēng tài 群落qún luò qún luò 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò zài zài zhōu zhōu 领地lǐng dì lǐng dì 列入liè rù liè rù dàn dàn zài zài EPBCEPBC EPBC 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn xià xià 列入liè rù liè rù de de 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 更高gèng gāo gèng gāo 优先级yōu xiān jí yōu xiān jí [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
这是zhè shì zhè shì 一个yí gè yí gè 故意gù yì gù yì de de 优先级yōu xiān jí yōu xiān jí 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé ér ér fēi fēi 冷淡lěng dàn lěng dàn
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì shì shì 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí de de ** * ** * EPBCEPBC EPBC 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn de de 设计shè jì shè jì 使得shǐ de shǐ de 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 列入liè rù liè rù 成为chéng wéi chéng wéi 可选项kě xuǎn xiàng kě xuǎn xiàng qiě qiě 基本上jī běn shàng jī běn shàng bèi bèi 执行zhí xíng zhí xíng
关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 过程guò chéng guò chéng 不是bú shì bú shì 国家guó jiā guó jiā 环境huán jìng huán jìng 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 事项shì xiàng shì xiàng 因此yīn cǐ yīn cǐ 列入liè rù liè rù 它们tā men tā men 不会bú huì bú huì 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ shàng shàng 强迫qiǎng pò qiǎng pò 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 考虑kǎo lǜ kǎo lǜ [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
这一zhè yī zhè yī 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 无论wú lùn wú lùn 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 如何rú hé rú hé dōu dōu 存在cún zài cún zài
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 某些mǒu xiē mǒu xiē 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 计划jì huà jì huà 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì le le 成功chéng gōng chéng gōng ** * ** * 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 本身běn shēn běn shēn 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū 列入liè rù liè rù 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 制定zhì dìng zhì dìng 计划jì huà jì huà 证明zhèng míng zhèng míng 成功chéng gōng chéng gōng de de 例外lì wài lì wài 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò
-- - 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 野猫yě māo yě māo 数量shù liàng shù liàng de de 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
-- - 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo zhǎng zhǎng bǎn bǎn mén mén 鱼业yú yè yú yè zhōng zhōng 海鸟hǎi niǎo hǎi niǎo [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
44 4 .. . ** * ** * gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 方法fāng fǎ fāng fǎ ** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 通过tōng guò tōng guò 其他qí tā qí tā 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 机制jī zhì jī zhì ér ér fēi fēi EPBCEPBC EPBC 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 列入liè rù liè rù 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià lái lái 解决jiě jué jiě jué 某些mǒu xiē mǒu xiē 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 气候变化qì hòu biàn huà qì hòu biàn huà [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
55 5 .. . ** * ** * 之前zhī qián zhī qián de de 配合pèi hé pèi hé ** * ** * gāi gāi 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng de de 失灵shī líng shī líng CoalitionCoalition Coalition 更早gèng zǎo gèng zǎo
火灾huǒ zāi huǒ zāi 状况zhuàng kuàng zhuàng kuàng 评估píng gū píng gū 20082008 2008 nián nián 以来yǐ lái yǐ lái 一直yì zhí yì zhí 滞后zhì hòu zhì hòu 最后zuì hòu zuì hòu 一次yī cì yī cì 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 列入liè rù liè rù shì shì zài zài 20142014 2014 nián nián CoalitionCoalition Coalition 重点zhòng diǎn zhòng diǎn 时期shí qī shí qī 之前zhī qián zhī qián ér ér 几十年jǐ shí nián jǐ shí nián qián qián de de 恢复huī fù huī fù 计划jì huà jì huà 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng le le 制度zhì dù zhì dù 惯性guàn xìng guàn xìng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
** * ** * 制度zhì dù zhì dù 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 失灵shī líng shī líng de de 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng ** * ** *
AndrewAndrew Andrew CoxCox Cox duì duì 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng 失灵shī líng shī líng 不能bù néng bù néng 正常zhèng cháng zhèng cháng 运作yùn zuò yùn zuò de de 评价píng jià píng jià shì shì 恰当qià dàng qià dàng de de [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
确定què dìng què dìng de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò
-- - 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 减缓jiǎn huǎn jiǎn huǎn 计划jì huà jì huà de de 可选kě xuǎn kě xuǎn 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
-- - 一旦yí dàn yí dàn 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì 计划jì huà jì huà de de 可选kě xuǎn kě xuǎn 实施shí shī shí shī [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
-- - 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 跟踪gēn zōng gēn zōng 计划jì huà jì huà 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu bèi bèi 遵守zūn shǒu zūn shǒu de de 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
-- - 无论wú lùn wú lùn 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 如何rú hé rú hé 资源zī yuán zī yuán dōu dōu 不足bù zú bù zú [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
-- - 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 列入liè rù liè rù 构成gòu chéng gòu chéng 需要xū yào xū yào 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 考虑kǎo lǜ kǎo lǜ de de 事项shì xiàng shì xiàng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 20192019 2019 nián nián 停止tíng zhǐ tíng zhǐ 推荐tuī jiàn tuī jiàn 评估píng gū píng gū de de 决定jué dìng jué dìng shì shì 这个zhè ge zhè ge 失灵shī líng shī líng 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng de de 症状zhèng zhuàng zhèng zhuàng ér ér fēi fēi 根本原因gēn běn yuán yīn gēn běn yuán yīn
然而rán ér rán ér shì shì 一个yí gè yí gè 主动zhǔ dòng zhǔ dòng 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 停止tíng zhǐ tíng zhǐ 尝试cháng shì cháng shì 通过tōng guò tōng guò 可用kě yòng kě yòng 机制jī zhì jī zhì lái lái 修复xiū fù xiū fù

属实

7.5

/ 10

澳大利亚政府ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ CoalitionCoalition Coalition 确实què shí què shí 停止tíng zhǐ tíng zhǐ le le duì duì 本地běn dì běn dì 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 威胁wēi xié wēi xié de de 评估píng gū píng gū 列入liè rù liè rù
The Australian government (Coalition) did cease assessing and listing key threats to native species.
zhè zhè 一点yì diǎn yì diǎn 得到dé dào dé dào le le 20192019 2019 nián nián 部门bù mén bù mén 简报jiǎn bào jiǎn bào 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn de de 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 停止tíng zhǐ tíng zhǐ 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì shòu shòu 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 科学kē xué kē xué 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì duì duì xīn xīn de de 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 过程guò chéng guò chéng 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 评估píng gū píng gū 以便yǐ biàn yǐ biàn 可能kě néng kě néng 列入liè rù liè rù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
This is evidenced by official departmental briefing documents from 2019 showing the government stopped recommending the threatened species scientific committee assess new key threatening processes for potential listing [1].
部门bù mén bù mén 明确míng què míng què 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 资源zī yuán zī yuán 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 列入liè rù liè rù 有限yǒu xiàn yǒu xiàn de de 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The department explicitly stated resource constraints and the limited regulatory influence of threat listings as justification [1].
然而rán ér rán ér zhè zhè 一声yī shēng yī shēng bèi bèi 需要xū yào xū yào 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng (( ( 11 1 )) ) 底层dǐ céng dǐ céng de de EPBCEPBC EPBC 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 存在cún zài cún zài 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 设计shè jì shè jì 缺陷quē xiàn quē xiàn 使得shǐ de shǐ de 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 列入liè rù liè rù 基本上jī běn shàng jī běn shàng 成为chéng wéi chéng wéi 可选项kě xuǎn xiàng kě xuǎn xiàng qiě qiě 无法wú fǎ wú fǎ 执行zhí xíng zhí xíng 这比zhè bǐ zhè bǐ CoalitionCoalition Coalition 更早gèng zǎo gèng zǎo 存在cún zài cún zài (( ( 22 2 )) ) 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ de de 官方guān fāng guān fāng 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 资源zī yuán zī yuán 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 物种wù zhǒng wù zhǒng 评估píng gū píng gū 优先yōu xiān yōu xiān 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo le le 故意gù yì gù yì de de 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé ér ér fēi fēi 冷淡lěng dàn lěng dàn (( ( 33 3 )) ) 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 评估píng gū píng gū de de 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng 失败shī bài shī bài shì shì 一个yí gè yí gè 长期存在cháng qī cún zài cháng qī cún zài de de 制度zhì dù zhì dù 问题wèn tí wèn tí ér ér fēi fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 创造chuàng zào chuàng zào de de 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 他们tā men tā men zài zài 20192019 2019 nián nián 正式zhèng shì zhèng shì 停止tíng zhǐ tíng zhǐ 追求zhuī qiú zhuī qiú 评估píng gū píng gū
However, this claim requires context: (1) the underlying EPBC Act has systemic design flaws making threat listings largely optional and unenforced, predating the Coalition; (2) the government's stated reasons (resource constraints, prioritization of species assessments) represent deliberate choices rather than indifference; and (3) the system's failure to assess threats is a long-standing institutional problem, not invented by the Coalition, though they formally ceased pursuing assessments in 2019.
gāi gāi shēng shēng bèi bèi zài zài 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què dàn dàn 最好zuì hǎo zuì hǎo bèi bèi 描述miáo shù miáo shù wèi wèi ** * ** * 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí dàn dàn 需要xū yào xū yào 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ** * ** * 公正gōng zhèng gōng zhèng 展现zhǎn xiàn zhǎn xiàn 完整wán zhěng wán zhěng de de 图景tú jǐng tú jǐng
The claim is factually accurate but best characterized as **TRUE BUT REQUIRES CONTEXT** to fairly represent the full picture.

📚 来源与引用 (1)

  1. 1
    theguardian.com

    theguardian.com

    Exclusive: Documents show department has stopped recommending assessment of ‘key threatening processes’ affecting native wildlife

    the Guardian

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。