部分属实

评分: 4.0/10

Coalition
C0114

声明内容

“利用一张表情包成功转移了媒体和公众对政府不作为的注意力,此前一份报告揭露澳大利亚特种部队士兵犯下了数十起可怕的战争罪行,而政府对此未采取任何措施解决系统性文化问题。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis

原始来源

事实核查

** * ** * BreretonBrereton Brereton 报告bào gào bào gào 战争zhàn zhēng zhàn zhēng 罪行zuì xíng zuì xíng 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng ** * ** *
**The Brereton Report and War Crimes Allegations** The claim references the Brereton Report, released on November 19, 2020.
gāi gāi 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng 提及tí jí tí jí BreretonBrereton Brereton 报告bào gào bào gào 20202020 2020 nián nián 1111 11 yuè yuè 1919 19 发布fā bù fā bù
The report is a formal investigation by the Inspector-General of the Australian Defence Force into alleged war crimes by Australian special forces in Afghanistan between 2005 and 2016 [1].
gāi gāi 报告bào gào bào gào shì shì 澳大利亚国防军ào dà lì yà guó fáng jūn ào dà lì yà guó fáng jūn 督察dū chá dū chá 长对zhǎng duì zhǎng duì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 特种部队tè zhǒng bù duì tè zhǒng bù duì zài zài 阿富汗ā fù hàn ā fù hàn 涉嫌shè xián shè xián 战争zhàn zhēng zhàn zhēng 罪行zuì xíng zuì xíng de de 正式zhèng shì zhèng shì 调查diào chá diào chá 时间跨度shí jiān kuà dù shí jiān kuà dù wèi wèi 20052005 2005 nián nián zhì zhì 20162016 2016 nián nián [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The report found "credible information" that Australian Defence Force personnel committed serious war crimes, including the unlawful killing of 39 Afghan civilians and prisoners [2].
报告bào gào bào gào 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn le le "" " 可信kě xìn kě xìn 信息xìn xī xìn xī "" " 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 澳大利亚国防军ào dà lì yà guó fáng jūn ào dà lì yà guó fáng jūn 人员rén yuán rén yuán 犯下fàn xià fàn xià le le 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 战争zhàn zhēng zhàn zhēng 罪行zuì xíng zuì xíng 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 非法fēi fǎ fēi fǎ 杀害shā hài shā hài 3939 39 míng míng 阿富汗ā fù hàn ā fù hàn 平民píng mín píng mín 囚犯qiú fàn qiú fàn [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
The report identified systemic cultural issues within the special forces units.
报告bào gào bào gào 确认què rèn què rèn le le 特种部队tè zhǒng bù duì tè zhǒng bù duì 单位dān wèi dān wèi 内部nèi bù nèi bù 存在cún zài cún zài 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 文化wén huà wén huà 问题wèn tí wèn tí
According to the investigation, these cultural problems contributed to an environment where war crimes could occur [3].
根据gēn jù gēn jù 调查diào chá diào chá 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 文化wén huà wén huà 问题wèn tí wèn tí 助长zhù zhǎng zhù zhǎng le le 一种yī zhǒng yī zhǒng 环境huán jìng huán jìng 使得shǐ de shǐ de 战争zhàn zhēng zhàn zhēng 罪行zuì xíng zuì xíng 可能kě néng kě néng 发生fā shēng fā shēng [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
The report made 143 recommendations to address both individual accountability and systemic issues [4]. **The Chinese Meme and Timeline** On November 30, 2020—11 days after the Brereton Report was released—Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian posted a fake image on Twitter depicting an Australian soldier holding a knife to an Afghan child's throat, with the caption "shocked by murder of Afghan civilians & prisoners by Australian soldiers.
报告bào gào bào gào 提出tí chū tí chū le le 143143 143 xiàng xiàng 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 解决jiě jué jiě jué 个人gè rén gè rén 问责wèn zé wèn zé 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 问题wèn tí wèn tí [[ [ 44 4 ]] ]
We strongly condemn such acts, & call for holding them accountable" [5].
** * ** * 中国zhōng guó zhōng guó 表情biǎo qíng biǎo qíng 包与bāo yǔ bāo yǔ 时间shí jiān shí jiān 线xiàn xiàn ** * ** *
This prompted a strong government response.
20202020 2020 nián nián 1111 11 yuè yuè 3030 30 BreretonBrereton Brereton 报告bào gào bào gào 发布fā bù fā bù 1111 11 天后tiān hòu tiān hòu 中国外交部zhōng guó wài jiāo bù zhōng guó wài jiāo bù 发言人fā yán rén fā yán rén 赵立zhào lì zhào lì 坚在jiān zài jiān zài 推特上tuī tè shàng tuī tè shàng 发布fā bù fā bù le le 一张yī zhāng yī zhāng 虚假xū jiǎ xū jiǎ 图片tú piàn tú piàn 描绘miáo huì miáo huì 一名yī míng yī míng 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 士兵shì bīng shì bīng 持刀chí dāo chí dāo 抵住dǐ zhù dǐ zhù 一名yī míng yī míng 阿富汗ā fù hàn ā fù hàn 儿童ér tóng ér tóng de de 喉咙hóu lóng hóu lóng 配文为pèi wén wèi pèi wén wèi "" " duì duì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 士兵shì bīng shì bīng 杀害shā hài shā hài 阿富汗ā fù hàn ā fù hàn 平民píng mín píng mín 囚犯qiú fàn qiú fàn de de 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi 感到gǎn dào gǎn dào 震惊zhèn jīng zhèn jīng
Prime Minister Scott Morrison called the tweet "repugnant" and demanded China apologize [6].
我们wǒ men wǒ men 强烈qiáng liè qiáng liè 谴责qiǎn zé qiǎn zé 此类cǐ lèi cǐ lèi 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi bìng bìng 呼吁hū yù hū yù 追究责任zhuī jiū zé rèn zhuī jiū zé rèn "" " [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
The diplomatic incident dominated media headlines for several days, shifting news focus from the war crimes report [7].
zhè zhè 引发yǐn fā yǐn fā le le 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ de de 强烈qiáng liè qiáng liè 回应huí yìng huí yìng
总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ ScottScott Scott MorrisonMorrison Morrison chēng chēng 这条zhè tiáo zhè tiáo 推文tuī wén tuī wén "" " 令人lìng rén lìng rén 憎恶zēng wù zēng wù "" " bìng bìng 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 中国zhōng guó zhōng guó 道歉dào qiàn dào qiàn [[ [ 66 6 ]] ]
这一zhè yī zhè yī 外交wài jiāo wài jiāo 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn 主导zhǔ dǎo zhǔ dǎo le le 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 头条tóu tiáo tóu tiáo 数日shù rì shù rì jiāng jiāng 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 焦点jiāo diǎn jiāo diǎn cóng cóng 战争zhàn zhēng zhàn zhēng 罪行zuì xíng zuì xíng 报告bào gào bào gào 转移zhuǎn yí zhuǎn yí kāi kāi [[ [ 77 7 ]] ]

缺失背景

然而rán ér rán ér gāi gāi 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng 提出tí chū tí chū le le 几项jǐ xiàng jǐ xiàng 需要xū yào xū yào 仔细zǐ xì zǐ xì 审查shěn chá shěn chá de de 断言duàn yán duàn yán
However, the claim makes several assertions that require closer examination: **"Used a meme to successfully distract":** The government did not "use" a meme—China's government posted it.
** * ** * "" " 利用lì yòng lì yòng 表情biǎo qíng biǎo qíng bāo bāo 成功chéng gōng chéng gōng 转移zhuǎn yí zhuǎn yí 注意力zhù yì lì zhù yì lì "" " ** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi "" " 利用lì yòng lì yòng "" " 表情biǎo qíng biǎo qíng bāo bāo shì shì 中国政府zhōng guó zhèng fǔ zhōng guó zhèng fǔ 发布fā bù fā bù le le
The claim implies the Australian government orchestrated the meme as a distraction tactic, but the evidence shows China posted it as a political attack.
gāi gāi 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng 暗示àn shì àn shì 澳大利亚政府ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ 策划cè huà cè huà le le 表情biǎo qíng biǎo qíng bāo bāo 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 转移zhuǎn yí zhuǎn yí 注意力zhù yì lì zhù yì lì de de 策略cè lüè cè lüè dàn dàn 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 中国zhōng guó zhōng guó jiāng jiāng 发布fā bù fā bù wèi wèi 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 攻击gōng jī gōng jī
This is a fundamental factual error [8]. **"Government's lack of action":** The government did take action in response to the Brereton Report.
这是zhè shì zhè shì 一个yí gè yí gè 根本性gēn běn xìng gēn běn xìng de de 错误cuò wù cuò wù [[ [ 88 8 ]] ]
Prior to the report's release, the government announced it would establish an Office of the Special Investigator (OSI) to investigate and prosecute war crimes allegations [9].
** * ** * "" " 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ de de 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi "" " ** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí duì duì BreretonBrereton Brereton 报告bào gào bào gào 采取cǎi qǔ cǎi qǔ le le 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng
The Department of Defence accepted all findings of the Brereton Report and committed to implementing all 143 recommendations [10].
zài zài 报告bào gào bào gào 发布fā bù fā bù 之前zhī qián zhī qián 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 宣布xuān bù xuān bù jiāng jiāng 设立shè lì shè lì 特别tè bié tè bié 调查员diào chá yuán diào chá yuán 办公室bàn gōng shì bàn gōng shì OSIOSI OSI lái lái 调查diào chá diào chá 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù 战争zhàn zhēng zhàn zhēng 罪行zuì xíng zuì xíng 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng [[ [ 99 9 ]] ]
This occurred in November 2020 during the Morrison government's tenure [11]. **Media Response to China's Meme:** While the Morrison government's strong response to China's meme dominated headlines, this was a Chinese government initiative—not an Australian government distraction strategy.
国防部guó fáng bù guó fáng bù 接受jiē shòu jiē shòu le le BreretonBrereton Brereton 报告bào gào bào gào de de 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 调查结果diào chá jié guǒ diào chá jié guǒ bìng bìng 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 实施shí shī shí shī 全部quán bù quán bù 143143 143 xiàng xiàng 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì [[ [ 1010 10 ]] ]
News coverage of the Brereton Report itself was substantial: The Guardian, ABC News, CNN, and other major outlets published extensively on the report both before and after the meme incident [12].
zhè zhè 发生fā shēng fā shēng zài zài 20202020 2020 nián nián 1111 11 yuè yuè MorrisonMorrison Morrison 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 任期rèn qī rèn qī nèi nèi [[ [ 1111 11 ]] ]
The meme created a secondary news story, but did not erase coverage of the core war crimes allegations [13]. **"Making no attempt to fix" systemic issues:** The claim that the government made no attempt to fix systemic cultural issues is contradicted by evidence.
** * ** * 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ duì duì 中国zhōng guó zhōng guó 表情biǎo qíng biǎo qíng bāo bāo de de 反应fǎn yìng fǎn yìng ** * ** * 虽然suī rán suī rán MorrisonMorrison Morrison 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ duì duì 中国zhōng guó zhōng guó 表情biǎo qíng biǎo qíng bāo bāo de de 强烈qiáng liè qiáng liè 回应huí yìng huí yìng 主导zhǔ dǎo zhǔ dǎo le le 头条新闻tóu tiáo xīn wén tóu tiáo xīn wén dàn dàn zhè zhè shì shì 中国政府zhōng guó zhèng fǔ zhōng guó zhèng fǔ 主动zhǔ dòng zhǔ dòng 发起fā qǐ fā qǐ de de 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng ér ér fēi fēi 澳大利亚政府ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ de de 转移zhuǎn yí zhuǎn yí 策略cè lüè cè lüè
The Department of Defence developed comprehensive cultural reform initiatives, compensation schemes, and accountability measures [14].
BreretonBrereton Brereton 报告bào gào bào gào 本身běn shēn běn shēn de de 新闻报道xīn wén bào dào xīn wén bào dào 相当xiāng dāng xiāng dāng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 卫报wèi bào wèi bào ABCABC ABC 新闻xīn wén xīn wén CNNCNN CNN děng děng 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ zài zài 表情biǎo qíng biǎo qíng bāo bāo 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn 前后qián hòu qián hòu dōu dōu duì duì 报告bào gào bào gào 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng le le 大量dà liàng dà liàng 报道bào dào bào dào [[ [ 1212 12 ]] ]
As of September 2024, the government had closed the Afghanistan Inquiry Report after implementing reforms [15].
表情biǎo qíng biǎo qíng bāo bāo 制造zhì zào zhì zào le le 次要cì yào cì yào 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn dàn dàn 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 消对xiāo duì xiāo duì 核心hé xīn hé xīn 战争zhàn zhēng zhàn zhēng 罪行zuì xíng zuì xíng 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng de de 报道bào dào bào dào [[ [ 1313 13 ]] ]
** * ** * "" " wèi wèi 尝试cháng shì cháng shì 解决jiě jué jiě jué "" " 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 问题wèn tí wèn tí ** * ** * 关于guān yú guān yú 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ wèi wèi 尝试cháng shì cháng shì 解决jiě jué jiě jué 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 文化wén huà wén huà 问题wèn tí wèn tí de de 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù xiāng xiāng 矛盾máo dùn máo dùn
国防部guó fáng bù guó fáng bù 制定zhì dìng zhì dìng le le 全面quán miàn quán miàn de de 文化wén huà wén huà 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 举措jǔ cuò jǔ cuò 赔偿péi cháng péi cháng 计划jì huà jì huà 问责wèn zé wèn zé 措施cuò shī cuò shī [[ [ 1414 14 ]] ]
截至jié zhì jié zhì 20242024 2024 nián nián 99 9 yuè yuè 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ zài zài 实施shí shī shí shī 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé hòu hòu 关闭guān bì guān bì le le 阿富汗ā fù hàn ā fù hàn 调查报告diào chá bào gào diào chá bào gào [[ [ 1515 15 ]] ]

来源可信度评估

** * ** * 卫报wèi bào wèi bào 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng ** * ** * 提供tí gōng tí gōng de de 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 卫报wèi bào wèi bào 链接liàn jiē liàn jiē 20202020 2020 nián nián 1111 11 yuè yuè 1919 19 xiàn xiàn 返回fǎn huí fǎn huí 404404 404 错误cuò wù cuò wù 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng URLURL URL 可能kě néng kě néng 过时guò shí guò shí huò huò 错误cuò wù cuò wù
**Guardian Article:** The original Guardian link provided (from November 19, 2020) now returns a 404 error, suggesting the URL may be outdated or incorrect.
然而rán ér rán ér 卫报wèi bào wèi bào shì shì 一家yī jiā yī jiā 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 知名zhī míng zhī míng de de 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 机构jī gòu jī gòu 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 既定jì dìng jì dìng de de 可信度kě xìn dù kě xìn dù
However, the Guardian is a mainstream, reputable news organization with established credibility. **WSWS Source:** The second source (wsws.org) is the World Socialist Web Site, a publication with explicit left-wing socialist political alignment [16].
** * ** * WSWSWSWS WSWS 来源lái yuán lái yuán ** * ** * 第二个dì èr gè dì èr gè 来源lái yuán lái yuán wswswsws wsws .. . orgorg org shì shì 世界shì jiè shì jiè 社会主义shè huì zhǔ yì shè huì zhǔ yì 网站wǎng zhàn wǎng zhàn 一份yī fèn yī fèn 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 明确míng què míng què 左翼zuǒ yì zuǒ yì 社会主义shè huì zhǔ yì shè huì zhǔ yì 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng de de 出版物chū bǎn wù chū bǎn wù [[ [ 1616 16 ]] ]
While not inherently disqualifying, this source has a documented ideological lens that may frame issues to emphasize capitalist/government failures. **Junkee Source:** Junkee is an Australian news and culture site that published a critical analysis of the meme incident.
虽然suī rán suī rán zhè zhè 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 自动zì dòng zì dòng 失去shī qù shī qù 资格zī gé zī gé de de 因素yīn sù yīn sù dàn dàn gāi gāi 来源lái yuán lái yuán 有据可查yǒu jù kě chá yǒu jù kě chá de de 意识形态yì shí xíng tài yì shí xíng tài 视角shì jiǎo shì jiǎo 可能kě néng kě néng 会以huì yǐ huì yǐ 强调qiáng diào qiáng diào 资本主义zī běn zhǔ yì zī běn zhǔ yì // / 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 失败shī bài shī bài de de 方式fāng shì fāng shì lái lái 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 问题wèn tí wèn tí
The article acknowledges the complexity of the situation, including hypocrisy on both sides (Australia's offshore detention practices and China's Uyghur policies) [17].
** * ** * JunkeeJunkee Junkee 来源lái yuán lái yuán ** * ** * JunkeeJunkee Junkee shì shì 一家yī jiā yī jiā 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 文化wén huà wén huà 网站wǎng zhàn wǎng zhàn 发表fā biǎo fā biǎo le le 关于guān yú guān yú 表情biǎo qíng biǎo qíng bāo bāo 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn de de 分析fēn xī fēn xī 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng
It provides balanced reporting while noting legitimate criticisms.
gāi gāi 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn le le 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng de de 复杂性fù zá xìng fù zá xìng 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 双方shuāng fāng shuāng fāng de de 虚伪xū wěi xū wěi 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà de de 离岸lí àn lí àn 拘留jū liú jū liú 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 中国zhōng guó zhōng guó de de 维吾尔族wéi wú ěr zú wéi wú ěr zú 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè [[ [ 1717 17 ]] ]
提供tí gōng tí gōng le le 平衡píng héng píng héng de de 报道bào dào bào dào 同时tóng shí tóng shí 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū le le 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ de de 批评pī píng pī píng
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做过zuò guò zuò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng
**Did Labor do something similar?** Search conducted: "Labor government war crimes allegations military accountability Australia" Labor has faced its own military accountability challenges: - Labor under Prime Minister Kevin Rudd committed Australian forces to Afghanistan in 2008, continuing a deployment that began under the Howard government [18].
** * ** *
While not directly responsible for the war crimes (which occurred during both Labor's tenure and the Coalition's tenure between 2005-2016), Labor did not proactively investigate allegations during its 2007-2013 period in government. - Following the Brereton Report's release in November 2020, Labor's response was notably similar to the Coalition's: Labor leader Anthony Albanese and Shadow Minister Penny Wong both called for accountability and "Team Australia" unity against China's criticism, rather than using the meme incident to demand immediate government action [19]. - When Labor returned to government in 2022, it committed to "full implementation" of the Brereton Report's remaining recommendations [20].
搜索sōu suǒ sōu suǒ 关键词guān jiàn cí guān jiàn cí "" " LaborLabor Labor governmentgovernment government warwar war crimescrimes crimes allegationsallegations allegations militarymilitary military accountabilityaccountability accountability AustraliaAustralia Australia "" "
Defense statement notes that recommendations have been "addressed across the tenure of both Labor and Coalition Governments" [21]. **Finding:** Labor has not faced equivalent war crimes allegations while in government.
LaborLabor Labor 面临miàn lín miàn lín 自身zì shēn zì shēn de de 军事jūn shì jūn shì 问责wèn zé wèn zé 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn
Both major parties have handled international military accountability through formal investigations and institutional responses rather than political posturing around symbolic incidents.
-- - zài zài KevinKevin Kevin RuddRudd Rudd 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ 领导lǐng dǎo lǐng dǎo xià xià de de LaborLabor Labor 20082008 2008 nián nián 派遣pài qiǎn pài qiǎn 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 军队jūn duì jūn duì 前往qián wǎng qián wǎng 阿富汗ā fù hàn ā fù hàn 继续jì xù jì xù le le HowardHoward Howard 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 开始kāi shǐ kāi shǐ de de 部署bù shǔ bù shǔ [[ [ 1818 18 ]] ]
虽然suī rán suī rán LaborLabor Labor 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē duì duì 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 战争zhàn zhēng zhàn zhēng 罪行zuì xíng zuì xíng 负责fù zé fù zé 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 罪行zuì xíng zuì xíng 发生fā shēng fā shēng zài zài 20052005 2005 -- - 20162016 2016 年间nián jiān nián jiān LaborLabor Labor CoalisonCoalison Coalison 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 任期rèn qī rèn qī nèi nèi dàn dàn LaborLabor Labor zài zài 20072007 2007 -- - 20132013 2013 nián nián 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 期间qī jiān qī jiān 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 主动zhǔ dòng zhǔ dòng 调查diào chá diào chá 相关xiāng guān xiāng guān 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng
-- - zài zài 20202020 2020 nián nián 1111 11 yuè yuè BreretonBrereton Brereton 报告bào gào bào gào 发布fā bù fā bù hòu hòu LaborLabor Labor de de 回应huí yìng huí yìng CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 明显míng xiǎn míng xiǎn 相似xiāng sì xiāng sì LaborLabor Labor 领袖lǐng xiù lǐng xiù AnthonyAnthony Anthony AlbaneseAlbanese Albanese 影子yǐng zi yǐng zi 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng PennyPenny Penny WongWong Wong dōu dōu 呼吁hū yù hū yù 问责wèn zé wèn zé "" " 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 团队tuán duì tuán duì "" " 团结一致tuán jié yī zhì tuán jié yī zhì 对抗duì kàng duì kàng 中国zhōng guó zhōng guó de de 批评pī píng pī píng ér ér fēi fēi 利用lì yòng lì yòng 表情biǎo qíng biǎo qíng bāo bāo 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 立即lì jí lì jí 采取行动cǎi qǔ xíng dòng cǎi qǔ xíng dòng [[ [ 1919 19 ]] ]
-- - dāng dāng LaborLabor Labor 20222022 2022 nián nián 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng shí shí 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò "" " 全面实施quán miàn shí shī quán miàn shí shī "" " BreretonBrereton Brereton 报告bào gào bào gào 剩余shèng yú shèng yú de de 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì [[ [ 2020 20 ]] ]
国防guó fáng guó fáng 声明shēng míng shēng míng 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì zài zài "" " LaborLabor Labor CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 任期rèn qī rèn qī nèi nèi 得到dé dào dé dào 处理chǔ lǐ chǔ lǐ "" " [[ [ 2121 21 ]] ]
** * ** * 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn ** * ** * LaborLabor Labor zài zài 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 期间qī jiān qī jiān wèi wèi 面临miàn lín miàn lín 同等tóng děng tóng děng de de 战争zhàn zhēng zhàn zhēng 罪行zuì xíng zuì xíng 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng
两大liǎng dà liǎng dà 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng dōu dōu 通过tōng guò tōng guò 正式zhèng shì zhèng shì 调查diào chá diào chá 制度zhì dù zhì dù 回应huí yìng huí yìng ér ér fēi fēi 围绕wéi rào wéi rào 象征性xiàng zhēng xìng xiàng zhēng xìng 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn de de 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 姿态zī tài zī tài lái lái 处理chǔ lǐ chǔ lǐ 国际guó jì guó jì 军事jūn shì jūn shì 问责wèn zé wèn zé 问题wèn tí wèn tí
🌐

平衡视角

** * ** * 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ de de 批评pī píng pī píng ** * ** *
**Legitimate Criticisms:** The claim raises valid concerns about government response to war crimes: 1. **Initial institutional resistance:** The Brereton Report itself documented a "culture of secrecy and cover-up" within Defence, with resistance from within the SAS to truth-telling [22].
gāi gāi 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng 提出tí chū tí chū le le 关于guān yú guān yú 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ duì duì 战争zhàn zhēng zhàn zhēng 罪行zuì xíng zuì xíng 回应huí yìng huí yìng de de 有效yǒu xiào yǒu xiào 关切guān qiè guān qiè
An army lawyer, David McBride, faced life imprisonment for whistleblowing, and the ABC was raided and journalists threatened for reporting on war crimes [23]. 2. **Slow prosecution pace:** While the Office of the Special Investigator was established to investigate and prosecute, as of October 2024, no individuals had been referred for war crimes charges [24].
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 最初zuì chū zuì chū de de 制度zhì dù zhì dù 抵制dǐ zhì dǐ zhì ** * ** * BreretonBrereton Brereton 报告bào gào bào gào 本身běn shēn běn shēn 记录jì lù jì lù le le 国防部guó fáng bù guó fáng bù 内部nèi bù nèi bù 存在cún zài cún zài "" " 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì 掩盖yǎn gài yǎn gài de de 文化wén huà wén huà "" " SASSAS SAS 内部nèi bù nèi bù 存在cún zài cún zài duì duì 真相zhēn xiàng zhēn xiàng 披露pī lù pī lù de de 抵制dǐ zhì dǐ zhì [[ [ 2222 22 ]] ]
This suggests investigation progress has been slower than might be hoped. 3. **Cultural reform complexity:** Addressing systemic cultural issues in military organizations is notoriously difficult and slow, requiring sustained commitment across multiple governments [25]. **Government's Justifications and Actions:** 1. **Formal accountability structures:** The Morrison government established the OSI specifically to investigate war crimes—this is an institutional accountability mechanism, not inaction [26]. 2. **Acceptance of all findings:** The Department of Defence accepted all findings of the Brereton Report without defensiveness or denial [27]. 3. **Ongoing implementation:** The government implemented compensation schemes, reformed training practices, and addressed structural issues identified in the report [28]. 4. **Bipartisan continuation:** When Labor came to power in 2022, it continued implementation of recommendations, treating this as a national issue rather than a partisan one [29]. **Did the Meme Distract?** The claim's core assertion—that the government "used a meme to successfully distract"—is factually incorrect.
一名yī míng yī míng 陆军lù jūn lù jūn 律师lǜ shī lǜ shī DavidDavid David McBrideMcBride McBride yīn yīn 举报jǔ bào jǔ bào 面临miàn lín miàn lín 终身zhōng shēn zhōng shēn 监禁jiān jìn jiān jìn ABCABC ABC 遭到zāo dào zāo dào 突袭tū xí tū xí 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 记者jì zhě jì zhě yīn yīn 报道bào dào bào dào 战争zhàn zhēng zhàn zhēng 罪行zuì xíng zuì xíng ér ér 受到shòu dào shòu dào 威胁wēi xié wēi xié [[ [ 2323 23 ]] ]
However, there is a legitimate secondary point: the timing and intensity of the government's response to China's meme may have shifted media focus away from substantive discussion of the war crimes findings.
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 缓慢huǎn màn huǎn màn de de 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù 进度jìn dù jìn dù ** * ** * 虽然suī rán suī rán 设立shè lì shè lì le le 特别tè bié tè bié 调查员diào chá yuán diào chá yuán 办公室bàn gōng shì bàn gōng shì lái lái 调查diào chá diào chá 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù dàn dàn 截至jié zhì jié zhì 20242024 2024 nián nián 1010 10 yuè yuè 尚无shàng wú shàng wú 个人gè rén gè rén bèi bèi 移交yí jiāo yí jiāo 战争zhàn zhēng zhàn zhēng 罪行zuì xíng zuì xíng 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng [[ [ 2424 24 ]] ]
News coverage shifted from accountability mechanisms to diplomatic tensions [30].
zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 调查diào chá diào chá 进展jìn zhǎn jìn zhǎn 可能kě néng kě néng 预期yù qī yù qī de de yào yào màn màn
However, this reflects normal news cycle dynamics and Chinese government action, not deliberate Coalition distraction.
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 文化wén huà wén huà 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé de de 复杂性fù zá xìng fù zá xìng ** * ** * 解决jiě jué jiě jué 军事jūn shì jūn shì 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī zhōng zhōng de de 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 文化wén huà wén huà 问题wèn tí wèn tí shì shì 众所周知zhòng suǒ zhōu zhī zhòng suǒ zhōu zhī de de 困难kùn nán kùn nán 缓慢huǎn màn huǎn màn de de 过程guò chéng guò chéng 需要xū yào xū yào 多个duō gè duō gè 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ de de 持续chí xù chí xù 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò [[ [ 2525 25 ]] ]
The government's strong response to China's meme was politically necessary (appearing weak on Chinese attacks would have been costly domestically), and the substance of the Brereton findings continued to receive coverage in serious media outlets [31].
** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ de de 辩护biàn hù biàn hù 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng ** * ** *
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 正式zhèng shì zhèng shì de de 问责wèn zé wèn zé 结构jié gòu jié gòu ** * ** * MorrisonMorrison Morrison 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 专门zhuān mén zhuān mén 设立shè lì shè lì OSIOSI OSI lái lái 调查diào chá diào chá 战争zhàn zhēng zhàn zhēng 罪行zuì xíng zuì xíng 这是zhè shì zhè shì 一种yī zhǒng yī zhǒng 制度zhì dù zhì dù 问责wèn zé wèn zé 机制jī zhì jī zhì ér ér fēi fēi 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi [[ [ 2626 26 ]] ]
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 接受jiē shòu jiē shòu 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 调查结果diào chá jié guǒ diào chá jié guǒ ** * ** * 国防部guó fáng bù guó fáng bù 毫无háo wú háo wú 防御性fáng yù xìng fáng yù xìng huò huò 否认fǒu rèn fǒu rèn 接受jiē shòu jiē shòu le le BreretonBrereton Brereton 报告bào gào bào gào de de 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 调查结果diào chá jié guǒ diào chá jié guǒ [[ [ 2727 27 ]] ]
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 持续chí xù chí xù 实施shí shī shí shī ** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 实施shí shī shí shī le le 赔偿péi cháng péi cháng 计划jì huà jì huà 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé le le 训练xùn liàn xùn liàn 实践shí jiàn shí jiàn bìng bìng 解决jiě jué jiě jué le le 报告bào gào bào gào zhōng zhōng 确定què dìng què dìng de de 结构性jié gòu xìng jié gòu xìng 问题wèn tí wèn tí [[ [ 2828 28 ]] ]
44 4 .. . ** * ** * 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 继续jì xù jì xù 实施shí shī shí shī ** * ** * dāng dāng LaborLabor Labor 20222022 2022 nián nián 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng shí shí 继续jì xù jì xù 实施shí shī shí shī 各项gè xiàng gè xiàng 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì jiāng jiāng 视为shì wèi shì wèi 国家guó jiā guó jiā 问题wèn tí wèn tí ér ér fēi fēi 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 问题wèn tí wèn tí [[ [ 2929 29 ]] ]
** * ** * 表情biǎo qíng biǎo qíng bāo bāo 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 转移zhuǎn yí zhuǎn yí le le 注意力zhù yì lì zhù yì lì
** * ** *
gāi gāi 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng de de 核心hé xīn hé xīn 断言duàn yán duàn yán 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ "" " 利用lì yòng lì yòng 表情biǎo qíng biǎo qíng bāo bāo 成功chéng gōng chéng gōng 转移zhuǎn yí zhuǎn yí 注意力zhù yì lì zhù yì lì "" " zài zài 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng shì shì 错误cuò wù cuò wù de de
然而rán ér rán ér 存在cún zài cún zài 一个yí gè yí gè 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ de de 次要cì yào cì yào 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ duì duì 中国zhōng guó zhōng guó 表情biǎo qíng biǎo qíng bāo bāo de de 回应huí yìng huí yìng 时机shí jī shí jī 强度qiáng dù qiáng dù 可能kě néng kě néng jiāng jiāng 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 焦点jiāo diǎn jiāo diǎn cóng cóng 战争zhàn zhēng zhàn zhēng 罪行zuì xíng zuì xíng 调查结果diào chá jié guǒ diào chá jié guǒ de de 实质性shí zhì xìng shí zhì xìng 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn 转移zhuǎn yí zhuǎn yí kāi kāi
新闻报道xīn wén bào dào xīn wén bào dào cóng cóng 问责wèn zé wèn zé 机制jī zhì jī zhì 转向zhuǎn xiàng zhuǎn xiàng 外交wài jiāo wài jiāo 紧张局势jǐn zhāng jú shì jǐn zhāng jú shì [[ [ 3030 30 ]] ]
然而rán ér rán ér zhè zhè 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng le le 正常zhèng cháng zhèng cháng de de 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 周期zhōu qī zhōu qī 动态dòng tài dòng tài 中国政府zhōng guó zhèng fǔ zhōng guó zhèng fǔ de de 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng ér ér fēi fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 刻意kè yì kè yì de de 转移zhuǎn yí zhuǎn yí 策略cè lüè cè lüè
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ duì duì 中国zhōng guó zhōng guó 表情biǎo qíng biǎo qíng bāo bāo de de 强烈qiáng liè qiáng liè 回应huí yìng huí yìng 在政治上zài zhèng zhì shàng zài zhèng zhì shàng shì shì yǒu yǒu 必要bì yào bì yào de de zài zài 应对yìng duì yìng duì 中国zhōng guó zhōng guó 攻击gōng jī gōng jī shí shí 显得xiǎn de xiǎn de 软弱ruǎn ruò ruǎn ruò zài zài 国内guó nèi guó nèi jiāng jiāng 付出fù chū fù chū 高昂gāo áng gāo áng 代价dài jià dài jià 而且ér qiě ér qiě BreretonBrereton Brereton 调查结果diào chá jié guǒ diào chá jié guǒ 继续jì xù jì xù zài zài 严肃yán sù yán sù 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ zhōng zhōng 获得huò dé huò dé 报道bào dào bào dào [[ [ 3131 31 ]] ]

部分属实

4.0

/ 10

核心hé xīn hé xīn 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng 包含bāo hán bāo hán 一个yí gè yí gè 根本性gēn běn xìng gēn běn xìng de de 错误cuò wù cuò wù 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi "" " 利用lì yòng lì yòng "" " 表情biǎo qíng biǎo qíng bāo bāo shì shì 中国zhōng guó zhōng guó jiāng jiāng 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 攻击gōng jī gōng jī 发布fā bù fā bù de de
The core claim contains a fundamental factual error: the government did not "use" a meme—China posted it as a political attack.
gāi gāi 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng 正确zhèng què zhèng què 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū 表情biǎo qíng biǎo qíng 包是bāo shì bāo shì zài zài BreretonBrereton Brereton 报告bào gào bào gào 1111 11 yuè yuè 1919 19 发布fā bù fā bù 1111 11 天后tiān hòu tiān hòu 发布fā bù fā bù de de bìng bìng 主导zhǔ dǎo zhǔ dǎo le le 头条新闻tóu tiáo xīn wén tóu tiáo xīn wén dàn dàn 错误cuò wù cuò wù jiāng jiāng 主体zhǔ tǐ zhǔ tǐ 归因于guī yīn yú guī yīn yú 澳大利亚政府ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ
The claim correctly identifies that a meme was posted 11 days after the Brereton Report (November 19) and dominated headlines, but incorrectly attributes agency to the Australian government.
然而rán ér rán ér gāi gāi 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng 关于guān yú guān yú "" " 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi "" " de de 断言duàn yán duàn yán 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù xiāng xiāng 矛盾máo dùn máo dùn 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì le le 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù 机制jī zhì jī zhì 接受jiē shòu jiē shòu le le 报告bào gào bào gào de de 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 调查结果diào chá jié guǒ diào chá jié guǒ bìng bìng 实施shí shī shí shī le le 制度zhì dù zhì dù 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé [[ [ 3232 32 ]] ]
However, the claim's assertion about the "government's lack of action" is contradicted by evidence: the government established prosecution mechanisms, accepted all report findings, and implemented institutional reforms [32].
关于guān yú guān yú 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ "" " wèi wèi 尝试cháng shì cháng shì 解决jiě jué jiě jué "" " 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 问题wèn tí wèn tí de de 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng 同样tóng yàng tóng yàng 缺乏quē fá quē fá 支持zhī chí zhī chí 全面quán miàn quán miàn de de 文化wén huà wén huà 结构jié gòu jié gòu 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 已经yǐ jīng yǐ jīng 实施shí shī shí shī [[ [ 3333 33 ]] ]
The claim that the government made "no attempt to fix" systemic issues is similarly unsupported—comprehensive cultural and structural reforms were implemented [33].
gāi gāi 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng 确实què shí què shí 提出tí chū tí chū le le 关于guān yú guān yú 制度zhì dù zhì dù 抵制dǐ zhì dǐ zhì 问责wèn zé wèn zé 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù 速度sù dù sù dù de de 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn dàn dàn jiāng jiāng 夸大kuā dà kuā dà wèi wèi 完全wán quán wán quán 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi
The claim does raise a legitimate point about institutional resistance to accountability and the pace of prosecutions, but overstates this as complete inaction.
这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 描述miáo shù miáo shù gèng gèng 符合fú hé fú hé "" " 缓慢huǎn màn huǎn màn 不足bù zú bù zú de de 进展jìn zhǎn jìn zhǎn "" " ér ér fēi fēi "" " 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng "" "
The characterization is more consistent with "slow, insufficient progress" rather than "no action."

📚 来源与引用 (22)

  1. 1
    War crimes in Afghanistan: the Brereton Report and the Office of the Special Investigator

    War crimes in Afghanistan: the Brereton Report and the Office of the Special Investigator

    Key issue A 2020 report of the Inspector-General of the Australian Defence Force found credible information of war crimes committed by the ADF in Afghanistan between 2005 and 2016. The Office of the Special Investigator (OSI) is investigating these accusations. To date,

    Aph Gov
  2. 2
    Brereton Report - Wikipedia

    Brereton Report - Wikipedia

    Wikipedia
  3. 3
    Australia's war crimes in Afghanistan — how could those up the chain ever let this happen?

    Australia's war crimes in Afghanistan — how could those up the chain ever let this happen?

    While Thursday's release of the Brereton report was a huge moment, it actually marks the middle of a process, writes Michelle Grattan.

    Abc Net
  4. 4
    minister.defence.gov.au

    Statement on the closure of the Afghanistan Inquiry Report

    Minister Defence Gov

  5. 5
    China And Australia Are Fighting Over A War Crimes Meme. Here's What You Need To Know

    China And Australia Are Fighting Over A War Crimes Meme. Here's What You Need To Know

    The PM wants the Chinese ministry of foreign affairs to apologise, but they've just doubled down, saying "the Australian Government should do some soul searching".

    Junkee
  6. 6
    Australia demands apology after China's Zhao Lijian tweets 'falsified image'

    Australia demands apology after China's Zhao Lijian tweets 'falsified image'

    Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison has demanded the Chinese government delete a “repugnant” and “falsified image” on Twitter that appears to show an Australian soldier threatening to slit a child’s throat.

    CNN
  7. 7
    Tweet storm shows China aims to project power through provocation

    Tweet storm shows China aims to project power through provocation

    On 30 November, China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson Zhao Lijian tweeted an artist’s interpretation of the war crime allegations made against Australian special forces soldiers. The image provoked a strong response from Australian Prime ...

    The Strategist
  8. 8
    China unleashes fearsome new cyber-weapon: A very provocative meme

    China unleashes fearsome new cyber-weapon: A very provocative meme

    This one has Australia, America, even the wine-drinking world angry

    Theregister
  9. 9
    Special investigator appointed to prosecute Australian soldiers accused of war crimes

    Special investigator appointed to prosecute Australian soldiers accused of war crimes

    A special investigator will be appointed to prosecute allegations of Australian war crimes in Afghanistan as the Government prepares to release a long-awaited report into the conduct of special forces during the conflict.

    Abc Net
  10. 10
    2020 Brereton Report

    2020 Brereton Report

    (Content Pending)   ‘War crimes in Afghanistan: the Brereton Report and the Office of the Special Investigator” by Dr Shannon Torrens, included  in the Briefing Book Article, 47th Parliament, June 2022, https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_departments/Parliamentary_Library/Research/Briefing_Book/47th_Parliament/BreretonReport Key issue(s): A 2020 report of the Inspector-General of the Australian Defence Force found credible information of war crimes […]

    JulianKnight.com.au
  11. 11
    Afghanistan panel suggests military top brass be held 'accountable' for war crimes

    Afghanistan panel suggests military top brass be held 'accountable' for war crimes

    An independent panel found a lack of accountability from Australia's military top brass over alleged war crimes has generated "anger and bitter resentment" among troops and veterans.

    Abc Net
  12. 12
    Brereton report on Australian war crimes throws light on a culture of secrecy and cover-up

    Brereton report on Australian war crimes throws light on a culture of secrecy and cover-up

    The Morrison Government has keenly used the military as props, but now horrific war crime revelations must spur more openness from the Government and Defence Force alike, writes Laura Tingle.

    Abc Net
  13. 13
    Defence closes Afghanistan Inquiry Report

    Defence closes Afghanistan Inquiry Report

    Mr Speaker,In 2016 the Inspector-General of the Australian Defence Force commissioned a judicial officer, Major General the Honourable Paul Brereton

    Mirage News
  14. 14
    Defence Department sets out compensation plan for unlawful Afghanistan killings

    Defence Department sets out compensation plan for unlawful Afghanistan killings

    The Australian government has laid out how it will compensate the families of people found to have been unlawfully killed or abused by Australian special forces in Afghanistan.

    Abc Net
  15. 15
    wsws.org

    World Socialist Web Site - About

    Wsws

    Original link no longer available
  16. 16
    China And Australia Are Fighting Over A War Crimes Meme

    China And Australia Are Fighting Over A War Crimes Meme

    The PM wants the Chinese ministry of foreign affairs to apologise, but they've just doubled down, saying "the Australian Government should do some soul searching".

    Junkee
  17. 17
    en.wikipedia.org

    Australia's involvement in Afghanistan - Wikipedia

    En Wikipedia

  18. 18
    PDF

    War Crimes: Where do Responsibility and Accountability Start and End?

    Australiainstitute Org • PDF Document
  19. 19
    Why allegations of war crimes against Australian Defence Force soldiers may not result in prosecutions

    Why allegations of war crimes against Australian Defence Force soldiers may not result in prosecutions

    Questions are being raised about how alleged war crimes by the Australian Defence Force are investigated, following the response to the Brereton inquiry.

    Abc Net
  20. 20
    PDF

    Implementing the Brereton Report Recommendations: Reparations for Afghan Victims of Australian Special Forces Abuses

    Acij Org • PDF Document
  21. 21
    Special investigator to prosecute alleged war crimes by Australian soldiers in Afghanistan

    Special investigator to prosecute alleged war crimes by Australian soldiers in Afghanistan

    Prime Minister Scott Morrison foreshadowed “difficult and hard news" ahead of the release of a report into the allegations next week.

    SBS News
  22. 22
    China scores a direct hit against Australia with 'shitpost diplomacy'

    China scores a direct hit against Australia with 'shitpost diplomacy'

    Zhao Lijian's 'shitpost' on Twitter provoked exactly the desired reaction from Canberra.

    Crikey

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。