具有误导性

评分: 3.0/10

Coalition
C0066

声明内容

“通过强制公司董事通过myGovID注册特殊标识符,为企业增加了繁文缛节。这 supposedly 是为了让投资者更容易追踪在公司之间流动的公司董事。然而,董事的姓名、地址、出生日期和出生地已经记录在公共数据库中,而该数据库将被这个新的15位数字取代。这种透明度尝试实际上减少了公众可获得的信息量。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 包含bāo hán bāo hán 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 需要xū yào xū yào 仔细zǐ xì zǐ xì 审查shěn chá shěn chá 的de de 事实shì shí shì shí 要素yào sù yào sù 。。 。
The claim contains several factual elements that require careful examination.
董事dǒng shì dǒng shì 识别shí bié shí bié 号码hào mǎ hào mǎ (( ( DINDIN DIN )) ) 计划jì huà jì huà 是shì shì 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 存在cún zài cún zài 的de de ,, , 并bìng bìng 在zài zài 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 实施shí shī shí shī [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The Director Identification Number (DIN) scheme is real and was implemented in Australia [1][2].
董事dǒng shì dǒng shì 确实què shí què shí 需要xū yào xū yào 通过tōng guò tōng guò myGovIDmyGovID myGovID 注册zhù cè zhù cè ,, , 现有xiàn yǒu xiàn yǒu 董事dǒng shì dǒng shì 的de de 截止jié zhǐ jié zhǐ 日期rì qī rì qī 为wèi wèi 20222022 2022 年nián nián 1111 11 月yuè yuè 3030 30 日rì rì ,, , 新xīn xīn 董事dǒng shì dǒng shì 需要xū yào xū yào 在zài zài 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 前qián qián 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
Directors were indeed required to register via myGovID, with a deadline of November 30, 2022 for existing directors, and new directors required to apply before appointment [1][3].
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 关于guān yú guān yú 信息xìn xī xìn xī 被bèi bèi "" " 取代qǔ dài qǔ dài "" " 的de de 核心hé xīn hé xīn 断言duàn yán duàn yán 是shì shì ** * ** * 事实shì shí shì shí 错误cuò wù cuò wù 的de de ** * ** * 。。 。
However, the core assertion about information being "replaced" is **factually incorrect**.
DINDIN DIN 计划jì huà jì huà 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 取代qǔ dài qǔ dài ASICASIC ASIC 注册zhù cè zhù cè 簿bù bù 上shàng shàng 现有xiàn yǒu xiàn yǒu 的de de 董事dǒng shì dǒng shì 信息xìn xī xìn xī 。。 。
The DIN scheme does NOT replace existing director information on the ASIC register.
根据gēn jù gēn jù ASICASIC ASIC 的de de 官方guān fāng guān fāng 指导zhǐ dǎo zhǐ dǎo ,, , 董事dǒng shì dǒng shì IDID ID "" " 不bù bù 记录jì lù jì lù 在zài zài CompaniesCompanies Companies RegisterRegister Register 上shàng shàng "" " ,, , 且qiě qiě "" " 在zài zài 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng 注册zhù cè zhù cè 公司gōng sī gōng sī 或huò huò 更改gēng gǎi gēng gǎi 董事dǒng shì dǒng shì 详细信息xiáng xì xìn xī xiáng xì xìn xī 时shí shí ,, , 您nín nín 无需wú xū wú xū 告知gào zhī gào zhī 我们wǒ men wǒ men 您nín nín 的de de 董事dǒng shì dǒng shì IDID ID "" " [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
According to ASIC's official guidance, director IDs "are not recorded on the companies register" and "you do not need to tell us your director ID when you apply to register a company or make changes to director details" [4].
公共gōng gòng gōng gòng ASICASIC ASIC 注册zhù cè zhù cè 簿bù bù 继续jì xù jì xù 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì 董事dǒng shì dǒng shì 姓名xìng míng xìng míng 、、 、 地址dì zhǐ dì zhǐ 和hé hé 其他qí tā qí tā 个人信息gè rén xìn xī gè rén xìn xī ,, , 与yǔ yǔ 以前yǐ qián yǐ qián 一样yī yàng yī yàng [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
The public ASIC register continues to display director names, addresses, and other personal details as it did before [5][6].
该gāi gāi 计划jì huà jì huà 最初zuì chū zuì chū 由yóu yóu 联盟lián méng lián méng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 于yú yú 20172017 2017 年nián nián 99 9 月yuè yuè 1212 12 日rì rì 宣布xuān bù xuān bù ,, , 其qí qí 概念gài niàn gài niàn 最初zuì chū zuì chū 由yóu yóu 生产力shēng chǎn lì shēng chǎn lì 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 于yú yú 20152015 2015 年nián nián 99 9 月yuè yuè 提出tí chū tí chū [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。 。
The scheme was first announced on September 12, 2017 by the Coalition Government, with the concept initially recommended by the Productivity Commission in September 2015 [7].
立法lì fǎ lì fǎ (( ( 《《 《 20202020 2020 年nián nián 财政法cái zhèng fǎ cái zhèng fǎ 修正案xiū zhèng àn xiū zhèng àn 》》 》 )) ) 于yú yú 20202020 2020 年nián nián 66 6 月yuè yuè 通过tōng guò tōng guò ,, , 使shǐ shǐ 其qí qí 成为chéng wéi chéng wéi 正式zhèng shì zhèng shì 的de de 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。 。
The legislation (Treasury Laws Amendment Act 2020) passed in June 2020, making it a formal government requirement [8].

缺失背景

该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le 关于guān yú guān yú DINDIN DIN 计划jì huà jì huà 实际shí jì shí jì 运作yùn zuò yùn zuò 方式fāng shì fāng shì 的de de 几项jǐ xiàng jǐ xiàng 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 事实shì shí shì shí :: :
The claim omits several critical facts about how the DIN scheme actually operates: 1. **Dual system, not replacement**: The DIN is a **separate regulatory identifier** maintained by the Australian Business Registry Services (ABRS) for government tracking purposes [4].
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 双重shuāng chóng shuāng chóng 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 取代qǔ dài qǔ dài ** * ** * :: : DINDIN DIN 是shì shì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 商业shāng yè shāng yè 注册zhù cè zhù cè 服务fú wù fú wù (( ( ABRSABRS ABRS )) ) 为wèi wèi 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 追踪zhuī zōng zhuī zōng 目的mù dì mù dì 维护wéi hù wéi hù 的de de ** * ** * 单独dān dú dān dú 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 标识符biāo shí fú biāo shí fú ** * ** * [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
It does not replace or supersede the information directors continue to lodge with ASIC [5]. 2. **Public information still public**: Directors' names, dates of appointment, and addresses remain publicly available through ASIC searches and company extracts [6].
它tā tā 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 取代qǔ dài qǔ dài 或huò huò 取代qǔ dài qǔ dài 董事dǒng shì dǒng shì 继续jì xù jì xù 向xiàng xiàng ASICASIC ASIC 提交tí jiāo tí jiāo 的de de 信息xìn xī xìn xī [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
The DIN itself is not disclosed to the public—it is a regulator-facing identifier [4]. 3. **The purpose was different**: The DIN was designed to prevent "false or fraudulent director identities" and to track "director involvement in unlawful practices, such as illegal phoenix activity," not to reduce transparency [1][9]. 4. **Compliance mechanism**: Rather than reducing transparency, the DIN creates an enforcement mechanism.
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 公共信息gōng gòng xìn xī gōng gòng xìn xī 仍然réng rán réng rán 是shì shì 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 的de de ** * ** * :: : 董事dǒng shì dǒng shì 的de de 姓名xìng míng xìng míng 、、 、 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 日期rì qī rì qī 和hé hé 地址dì zhǐ dì zhǐ 仍然réng rán réng rán 通过tōng guò tōng guò ASICASIC ASIC 搜索sōu suǒ sōu suǒ 和hé hé 公司gōng sī gōng sī 摘录zhāi lù zhāi lù 向xiàng xiàng 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng 提供tí gōng tí gōng [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
Directors must apply for one, keep it up-to-date, and face penalties for failing to do so or misrepresenting it (up to 1 year imprisonment for applying for multiple IDs or misrepresentation) [4].
DINDIN DIN 本身běn shēn běn shēn 不向bù xiàng bù xiàng 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng 披露pī lù pī lù —— — —— — 它tā tā 是shì shì 面向miàn xiàng miàn xiàng 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 机构jī gòu jī gòu 的de de 标识符biāo shí fú biāo shí fú [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 目的mù dì mù dì 不同bù tóng bù tóng ** * ** * :: : DINDIN DIN 旨在zhǐ zài zhǐ zài 防止fáng zhǐ fáng zhǐ "" " 虚假xū jiǎ xū jiǎ 或huò huò 欺诈性qī zhà xìng qī zhà xìng 的de de 董事dǒng shì dǒng shì 身份shēn fèn shēn fèn "" " ,, , 并bìng bìng 追踪zhuī zōng zhuī zōng "" " 董事dǒng shì dǒng shì 参与cān yù cān yù 非法行为fēi fǎ xíng wéi fēi fǎ xíng wéi ,, , 如rú rú 非法fēi fǎ fēi fǎ 凤凰fèng huáng fèng huáng 活动huó dòng huó dòng "" " ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 99 9 ]] ] 。。 。
44 4 .. . ** * ** * 合规hé guī hé guī 机制jī zhì jī zhì ** * ** * :: : DINDIN DIN 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù ,, , 而是ér shì ér shì 创建chuàng jiàn chuàng jiàn 了le le 一个yí gè yí gè 执法zhí fǎ zhí fǎ 机制jī zhì jī zhì 。。 。
董事dǒng shì dǒng shì 必须bì xū bì xū 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng 一个yí gè yí gè ,, , 保持bǎo chí bǎo chí 更新gēng xīn gēng xīn ,, , 并bìng bìng 因yīn yīn 未能wèi néng wèi néng 这样zhè yàng zhè yàng 做zuò zuò 或huò huò 误报wù bào wù bào 而ér ér 面临miàn lín miàn lín 处罚chǔ fá chǔ fá (( ( 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng 多个duō gè duō gè IDID ID 或huò huò 误报wù bào wù bào 最高zuì gāo zuì gāo 可kě kě 判处pàn chǔ pàn chǔ 11 1 年nián nián 监禁jiān jìn jiān jìn )) ) [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。

来源可信度评估

原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán ZDNetZDNet ZDNet 是shì shì 一家yī jiā yī jiā 由yóu yóu ZiffZiff Ziff DavisDavis Davis 拥有yōng yǒu yōng yǒu 的de de 知名zhī míng zhī míng 科技kē jì kē jì 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 机构jī gòu jī gòu ,, , 提供tí gōng tí gōng 关于guān yú guān yú 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 数字shù zì shù zì 计划jì huà jì huà 的de de 事实shì shí shì shí 报道bào dào bào dào [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The original source ZDNet is a reputable technology news outlet owned by Ziff Davis and provides factual reporting on government digital initiatives [1].
该gāi gāi 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 报道bào dào bào dào 了le le DINDIN DIN 计划jì huà jì huà 的de de 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 和hé hé 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 。。 。
The article accurately reports on the announcement and requirements of the DIN scheme.
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , ZDNetZDNet ZDNet 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 提出tí chū tí chū 关于guān yú guān yú 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 的de de 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng —— — —— — 该gāi gāi 解释jiě shì jiě shì 来自lái zì lái zì 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 作者zuò zhě zuò zhě 。。 。
However, ZDNet does not make claims about transparency reduction—that interpretation comes from the claim author.
第二dì èr dì èr 来源lái yuán lái yuán (( ( GameGame Game ofof of MatesMates Mates )) ) 是shì shì 一本yī běn yī běn 关于guān yú guān yú 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 庇护bì hù bì hù 的de de 书籍shū jí shū jí ,, , 但dàn dàn 似乎sì hū sì hū 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 涉及shè jí shè jí DINDIN DIN 计划jì huà jì huà ,, , 这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 它tā tā 被bèi bèi 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 可能kě néng kě néng 是shì shì 为了wèi le wèi le 提供tí gōng tí gōng 关于guān yú guān yú 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 程序chéng xù chéng xù 的de de 一般yì bān yì bān 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 关于guān yú guān yú 董事dǒng shì dǒng shì 注册zhù cè zhù cè 的de de 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 。。 。
The second source (Game of Mates) is a book about political patronage in Australia but does not appear to specifically address the DIN scheme, suggesting it may be cited for general context about government processes rather than specific evidence about director registration.
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 提出tí chū tí chū 或huò huò 实施shí shī shí shī 了le le 类似lèi sì lèi sì 方案fāng àn fāng àn ?? ?
**Did Labor propose or implement something similar?** Search conducted: "Labor government director identification scheme accountability" Finding: The Director ID concept was originally recommended by the **Productivity Commission in September 2015**, during the Coalition Government period [7].
** * ** *
However, the Productivity Commission is an independent statutory agency making recommendations across government cycles.
搜索sōu suǒ sōu suǒ conductedconducted conducted :: : "" " LaborLabor Labor governmentgovernment government directordirector director identificationidentification identification schemescheme scheme accountabilityaccountability accountability "" "
Labor has not announced a competing scheme to replace the DIN, nor has Labor moved to abolish it since returning to government in 2022 [10].
发现fā xiàn fā xiàn :: : 董事dǒng shì dǒng shì IDID ID 概念gài niàn gài niàn 最初zuì chū zuì chū 由yóu yóu ** * ** * 生产力shēng chǎn lì shēng chǎn lì 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 于yú yú 20152015 2015 年nián nián 99 9 月yuè yuè ** * ** * 提出tí chū tí chū ,, , 当时dāng shí dāng shí 在zài zài 联盟lián méng lián méng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 时期shí qī shí qī [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。 。
This suggests bipartisan acceptance of the scheme's core objectives.
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 生产力shēng chǎn lì shēng chǎn lì 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 是shì shì 一个yí gè yí gè 独立dú lì dú lì 的de de 法定fǎ dìng fǎ dìng 机构jī gòu jī gòu ,, , 在zài zài 各gè gè 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 周期zhōu qī zhōu qī 提出tí chū tí chū 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 。。 。
工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 替代tì dài tì dài DINDIN DIN 的de de 竞争jìng zhēng jìng zhēng 方案fāng àn fāng àn ,, , 自zì zì 20222022 2022 年nián nián 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 以来yǐ lái yǐ lái 也yě yě 未wèi wèi 采取行动cǎi qǔ xíng dòng cǎi qǔ xíng dòng 废除fèi chú fèi chú 它tā tā [[ [ 1010 10 ]] ] 。。 。
这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 对duì duì 该gāi gāi 计划jì huà jì huà 核心hé xīn hé xīn 目标mù biāo mù biāo 的de de 接受jiē shòu jiē shòu 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

虽然suī rán suī rán 批评者pī píng zhě pī píng zhě 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi DINDIN DIN 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 增加zēng jiā zēng jiā 了le le 董事dǒng shì dǒng shì 的de de 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 负担fù dān fù dān ,, , 但dàn dàn 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 既定jì dìng jì dìng 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 是shì shì 合法hé fǎ hé fǎ 的de de :: : 防止fáng zhǐ fáng zhǐ 公司gōng sī gōng sī 欺诈qī zhà qī zhà 和hé hé 非法fēi fǎ fēi fǎ 凤凰fèng huáng fèng huáng 活动huó dòng huó dòng (( ( 资产zī chǎn zī chǎn 被bèi bèi 转移zhuǎn yí zhuǎn yí 到dào dào 新xīn xīn 公司gōng sī gōng sī 而ér ér 债务zhài wù zhài wù 被bèi bèi 留下liú xià liú xià )) ) [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 99 9 ]] ] 。。 。
While critics argue that the DIN requirement adds regulatory burden to directors, the government's stated justification was legitimate: preventing corporate fraud and illegal phoenix activity (where assets are transferred to a new company while debts are left behind) [1][9].
这是zhè shì zhè shì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 公司法gōng sī fǎ gōng sī fǎ 中zhōng zhōng 记录在案jì lù zài àn jì lù zài àn 的de de 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 问题wèn tí wèn tí 。。 。
This is a documented systemic issue in Australian corporate law.
该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 错误cuò wù cuò wù 描述miáo shù miáo shù 了le le 计划jì huà jì huà 的de de 运作yùn zuò yùn zuò 方式fāng shì fāng shì 。。 。
The claim mischaracterizes how the scheme works.
DINDIN DIN ** * ** * 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 取代qǔ dài qǔ dài ** * ** * 公共信息gōng gòng xìn xī gōng gòng xìn xī —— — —— — 它tā tā 通过tōng guò tōng guò 创建chuàng jiàn chuàng jiàn 一个yí gè yí gè 持久chí jiǔ chí jiǔ 标识符biāo shí fú biāo shí fú 来lái lái 补充bǔ chōng bǔ chōng 公共信息gōng gòng xìn xī gōng gòng xìn xī ,, , 该gāi gāi 标识符biāo shí fú biāo shí fú 可追踪kě zhuī zōng kě zhuī zōng 个人gè rén gè rén 在zài zài 各gè gè 董事dǒng shì dǒng shì 职位zhí wèi zhí wèi 和hé hé 实体shí tǐ shí tǐ 之间zhī jiān zhī jiān 的de de 流动liú dòng liú dòng 。。 。
The DIN does **not replace** public information—it supplements it by creating a persistent identifier that tracks individuals across directorships and entities.
董事dǒng shì dǒng shì 仍然réng rán réng rán 向xiàng xiàng ASICASIC ASIC 提交tí jiāo tí jiāo 相同xiāng tóng xiāng tóng 的de de 姓名xìng míng xìng míng 、、 、 地址dì zhǐ dì zhǐ 和hé hé 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 日期rì qī rì qī 信息xìn xī xìn xī ,, , 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 信息xìn xī xìn xī 仍然réng rán réng rán 可kě kě 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 访问fǎng wèn fǎng wèn [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
Directors still lodge the same name, address, and date of appointment information with ASIC, which remains publicly accessible [4][6].
重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 的de de 是shì shì ,, , 该gāi gāi 计划jì huà jì huà 包含bāo hán bāo hán 安全ān quán ān quán 条款tiáo kuǎn tiáo kuǎn :: : 如果rú guǒ rú guǒ 董事dǒng shì dǒng shì 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì 其qí qí 住宅zhù zhái zhù zhái 地址dì zhǐ dì zhǐ 可能kě néng kě néng 危及wēi jí wēi jí 其qí qí 本人běn rén běn rén 或huò huò 家人jiā rén jiā rén 的de de 安全ān quán ān quán ,, , 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng 不向bù xiàng bù xiàng 公共gōng gòng gōng gòng 展示zhǎn shì zhǎn shì 其qí qí 住宅zhù zhái zhù zhái 地址dì zhǐ dì zhǐ [[ [ 1111 11 ]] ] 。。 。
Importantly, the scheme includes safety provisions: directors can apply to suppress their residential address from public view if they believe displaying it could put their safety or family's safety at risk [11].
这zhè zhè 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 比bǐ bǐ 以前yǐ qián yǐ qián 提供tí gōng tí gōng 了le le ** * ** * 更gèng gèng 多duō duō 的de de 灵活性líng huó xìng líng huó xìng ** * ** * 来lái lái 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 董事dǒng shì dǒng shì 隐私yǐn sī yǐn sī 。。 。
This actually provides **more flexibility** for director privacy than existed before. **Key context:** The DIN scheme is an accountability mechanism, not a transparency reduction measure.
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng :: : ** * ** * DINDIN DIN 计划jì huà jì huà 是shì shì 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng 问责wèn zé wèn zé 机制jī zhì jī zhì ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 措施cuò shī cuò shī 。。 。
Public information about directors continues to be disclosed; what changed is that government now maintains a verified, persistent identifier to prevent fraudulent directorship claims and track problematic individuals across the corporate landscape.
关于guān yú guān yú 董事dǒng shì dǒng shì 的de de 公共信息gōng gòng xìn xī gōng gòng xìn xī 继续jì xù jì xù 披露pī lù pī lù ;; ; 变化biàn huà biàn huà 的de de 是shì shì 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 现在xiàn zài xiàn zài 维护wéi hù wéi hù 一个yí gè yí gè 经过jīng guò jīng guò 验证yàn zhèng yàn zhèng 的de de 持久chí jiǔ chí jiǔ 标识符biāo shí fú biāo shí fú ,, , 以yǐ yǐ 防止fáng zhǐ fáng zhǐ 欺诈性qī zhà xìng qī zhà xìng 董事dǒng shì dǒng shì 身份shēn fèn shēn fèn 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng ,, , 并bìng bìng 追踪zhuī zōng zhuī zōng 公司gōng sī gōng sī 领域lǐng yù lǐng yù 中zhōng zhōng problematicproblematic problematic individualsindividuals individuals 。。 。

具有误导性

3.0

/ 10

该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 错误cuò wù cuò wù 描述miáo shù miáo shù 了le le 董事dǒng shì dǒng shì IDID ID 计划jì huà jì huà 的de de 运作yùn zuò yùn zuò 方式fāng shì fāng shì 。。 。
The claim misrepresents how the Director ID scheme works.
虽然suī rán suī rán 董事dǒng shì dǒng shì 必须bì xū bì xū 注册zhù cè zhù cè DINDIN DIN 是shì shì 事实shì shí shì shí ,, , 但dàn dàn 该gāi gāi 计划jì huà jì huà 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 取代qǔ dài qǔ dài 关于guān yú guān yú 董事dǒng shì dǒng shì 的de de 现有xiàn yǒu xiàn yǒu 公共信息gōng gòng xìn xī gōng gòng xìn xī 。。 。
While it is true that directors must register for a DIN, the scheme does NOT replace existing public information about directors.
董事dǒng shì dǒng shì 的de de 姓名xìng míng xìng míng 、、 、 地址dì zhǐ dì zhǐ 、、 、 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 日期rì qī rì qī 和hé hé 其他qí tā qí tā 个人信息gè rén xìn xī gè rén xìn xī 仍然réng rán réng rán 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 在zài zài 公共gōng gòng gōng gòng ASICASIC ASIC 注册zhù cè zhù cè 簿bù bù 中zhōng zhōng ,, , 与yǔ yǔ 计划jì huà jì huà 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù 前qián qián 一样yī yàng yī yàng [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
Directors' names, addresses, appointment dates, and other personal details remain in the public ASIC register as they did before the scheme was introduced [4][6].
DINDIN DIN 是shì shì 一个yí gè yí gè 单独dān dú dān dú 的de de 、、 、 非fēi fēi 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 的de de 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 标识符biāo shí fú biāo shí fú ,, , 由yóu yóu 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 用于yòng yú yòng yú 欺诈qī zhà qī zhà 预防yù fáng yù fáng 和hé hé 执法zhí fǎ zhí fǎ ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 取代qǔ dài qǔ dài 公共gōng gòng gōng gòng 注册zhù cè zhù cè 簿bù bù 。。 。
The DIN is a separate, non-public regulatory identifier used by government for fraud prevention and enforcement, not a replacement for the public register.
该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 断言duàn yán duàn yán "" " 这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 尝试cháng shì cháng shì 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 了le le 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng 可kě kě 获得huò dé huò dé 的de de 信息量xìn xī liàng xìn xī liàng "" " 是shì shì 事实shì shí shì shí 错误cuò wù cuò wù 的de de 。。 。
The claim's assertion that "this attempt at transparency actually reduces the amount of information available to the public" is factually incorrect.

📚 来源与引用 (10)

  1. 1
    zdnet.com

    zdnet.com

    The federal government hopes a new digital ID for company directors will minimise fraud and illegal activity.

    ZDNET
  2. 2
    asic.gov.au

    asic.gov.au

    Fair, strong and efficient financial system for all Australians.

    Asic Gov
  3. 3
    abrs.gov.au

    abrs.gov.au

    Abrs Gov

  4. 4
    sprintlaw.com.au

    sprintlaw.com.au

    Explore how to navigate ASIC’s Company Director Search and the DIN regime for enhanced transparency. Our guide provides best practices to ensure governance and accountability within your organization.

    Sprintlaw
  5. 5
    thecorporatemanager.com

    thecorporatemanager.com

    If you need to find out who your company’s directors are, and which address details are listed on ASIC’s records, it can be difficult to know where to look.

    The Corporate Manager
  6. 6
    asic.gov.au

    asic.gov.au

    Fair, strong and efficient financial system for all Australians.

    Asic Gov
  7. 7
    dwfoxtucker.com.au

    dwfoxtucker.com.au

    DW Fox Tucker Lawyers
  8. 8
    PDF

    DINNov2020

    Finlaysons Com • PDF Document
  9. 9
    businessknowhow.com.au

    businessknowhow.com.au

    Director IDs four years on: Purpose, progress, and what’s next for company directors in Australia

    Businessknowhow Com
  10. 10
    brightlaw.com.au

    brightlaw.com.au

    If you are a company director or secretary ASIC has issued INFO 5 which explains how company directors or secretaries can apply to have their residential address hidden from public view. A director or secretary can apply to ASIC to suppress their residential address from public view if they believe that their address appearing on... Read more »

    Bright Law

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。