部分属实

评分: 6.0/10

Coalition
C0055

声明内容

“引入了新的警方权力,可在没有搜查令的情况下监视和入侵无辜澳大利亚人的设备,即使他们没有被怀疑犯下任何罪行。权力包括窥探、修改、删除数据以及账户接管。该法案在交给中立议员审查仅数小时后即进行表决。该法案经过情报机构审查,但没有公共利益隐私倡导者参与审查。该法案违背了政府自己对入侵权力的审查。政府拒绝了一项提议,即设立公共利益倡导者为被入侵者辩护,以平衡隐私与安全。其论点是如果你没有做错事,就没有什么可隐瞒的。权力包括移除账户上的双因素认证,从而使无关犯罪分子更容易入侵这些澳大利亚人的账户。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis
分析时间: 29 Jan 2026

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

《《 《 20212021 2021 年nián nián 监控jiān kòng jiān kòng 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 修正案xiū zhèng àn xiū zhèng àn (( ( 识别shí bié shí bié 与yǔ yǔ 阻断zǔ duàn zǔ duàn )) ) 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 》》 》 于yú yú 20212021 2021 年nián nián 88 8 月yuè yuè 2525 25 日rì rì 由yóu yóu 议会yì huì yì huì 通过tōng guò tōng guò ,, , 并于bìng yú bìng yú 20212021 2021 年nián nián 99 9 月yuè yuè 33 3 日rì rì 获得huò dé huò dé 御准yù zhǔn yù zhǔn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The Surveillance Legislation Amendment (Identify and Disrupt) Act 2021 was passed by Parliament on 25 August 2021 and received Royal Assent on 3 September 2021 [1].
关于guān yú guān yú 该gāi gāi 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù 新xīn xīn 的de de 警方jǐng fāng jǐng fāng 权力quán lì quán lì 的de de 核心hé xīn hé xīn 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 在zài zài 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng 是shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de 。。 。
The core claim that the legislation introduces new police powers is factually accurate. **The Three New Powers:** The Act introduced three new warrant types for the Australian Federal Police (AFP) and Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission (ACIC) [1]: - **Data disruption warrants**: Allow police to access devices and "modify, add, copy, or delete data" [2] - **Network activity warrants**: Allow law enforcement to surveil online activity of suspects [2] - **Account takeover warrants**: Allow police to take control of online accounts [2] **The "Without Warrant" Claim - MISLEADING:** The claim states police can act "without a warrant, even if they're not suspected of committing any crime." This is partially misleading: - All three powers require warrants under normal circumstances, issued by a judicial officer [3] - However, "emergency authorisation" does allow police to act WITHOUT a warrant in urgent situations if they reasonably suspect "imminent serious violence or damage to property" and believe it's not practicable to apply for a warrant [3] - These emergency measures must be retrospectively approved by a judicial officer [3] - The requirement is "reasonable suspicion" of a "serious crime" (defined as any offence with penalty >3 years), not actual proof of criminal activity [3] The "reasonable suspicion" threshold is notably low and broad, but warrants are technically required in normal circumstances. **Legislation Voted on "Only Hours" After Crossbench Review - TRUE:** The bill was "blitzed through both Federal Houses of Parliament in under 24 hours" and passed on 25 August 2021 [4].
** * ** * 三项sān xiàng sān xiàng 新xīn xīn 权力quán lì quán lì :: : ** * ** *
This is confirmed across multiple sources [2], [3].
该gāi gāi 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 为wèi wèi 澳大利亚联邦ào dà lì yà lián bāng ào dà lì yà lián bāng 警察jǐng chá jǐng chá (( ( AFPAFP AFP )) ) 和hé hé 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 刑事xíng shì xíng shì 情报qíng bào qíng bào 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì (( ( ACICACIC ACIC )) ) 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù 了le le 三项sān xiàng sān xiàng 新xīn xīn 的de de 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng 类型lèi xíng lèi xíng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] :: :
The brief review period is accurate. **Review by Intelligence Groups But Not Privacy Advocates - PARTIALLY TRUE BUT INCOMPLETE:** The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights did issue a report flagging serious concerns [3].
-- - ** * ** * 数据shù jù shù jù 干扰gān rǎo gān rǎo 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng ** * ** * :: : 允许yǔn xǔ yǔn xǔ 警方jǐng fāng jǐng fāng 访问fǎng wèn fǎng wèn 设备shè bèi shè bèi 并bìng bìng "" " 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi 、、 、 添加tiān jiā tiān jiā 、、 、 复制fù zhì fù zhì 或huò huò 删除shān chú shān chú 数据shù jù shù jù "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
While the claim is correct that privacy advocates were not part of the formal review process, the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights represents parliamentary scrutiny for human rights impacts.
-- - ** * ** * 网络wǎng luò wǎng luò 活动huó dòng huó dòng 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng ** * ** * :: : 允许yǔn xǔ yǔn xǔ 执法zhí fǎ zhí fǎ 部门bù mén bù mén 监视jiān shì jiān shì 嫌疑人xián yí rén xián yí rén 的de de 在线zài xiàn zài xiàn 活动huó dòng huó dòng [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
However, independent civil liberty and digital rights organisations submitted extensive submissions raising concerns that were not formally incorporated into the legislation [3], [4]. **Data Disruption Powers and Two-Factor Authentication - TRUE:** The legislation does allow police to "modify, add, copy, or delete data" [2], [3], which would technically enable removing two-factor authentication from accounts.
-- - ** * ** * 账户zhàng hù zhàng hù 接管jiē guǎn jiē guǎn 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng ** * ** * :: : 允许yǔn xǔ yǔn xǔ 警方jǐng fāng jǐng fāng 接管jiē guǎn jiē guǎn 在线zài xiàn zài xiàn 账户zhàng hù zhàng hù [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
This is a legitimate concern raised by security experts and legal analysts [3]. **"Against the Government's Own Review" - UNVERIFIED:** The claim references the government's own review into hacking powers.
** * ** * "" " 无需wú xū wú xū 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng "" " 的de de 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ —— — —— — 误导wù dǎo wù dǎo :: : ** * ** *
A recent statutory review by the Independent National Security Legislation Monitor (INSLM) found serious problems with the Act's implementation, determining that "hacking powers handed out without safeguard" and identifying that warrants were being issued by untrained individuals [5].
该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 称chēng chēng 警方jǐng fāng jǐng fāng 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ "" " 无需wú xū wú xū 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng ,, , 即使jí shǐ jí shǐ 他们tā men tā men 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 被bèi bèi 怀疑huái yí huái yí 犯下fàn xià fàn xià 任何rèn hé rèn hé 罪行zuì xíng zuì xíng "" " 也yě yě 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ 采取行动cǎi qǔ xíng dòng cǎi qǔ xíng dòng 。。 。
However, this review occurred in 2024-2025, AFTER the legislation was passed, not before.
这zhè zhè 在zài zài 一定yí dìng yí dìng 程度chéng dù chéng dù 上shàng shàng 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng :: :
I cannot verify a pre-legislation government review that opposed the bill.
-- - 在zài zài 正常zhèng cháng zhèng cháng 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 下xià xià ,, , 这三项zhè sān xiàng zhè sān xiàng 权力quán lì quán lì 都dōu dōu 需要xū yào xū yào 由yóu yóu 司法官员sī fǎ guān yuán sī fǎ guān yuán 颁发bān fā bān fā 的de de 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
-- - 然而rán ér rán ér ,, , "" " 紧急jǐn jí jǐn jí 授权shòu quán shòu quán "" " 确实què shí què shí 允许yǔn xǔ yǔn xǔ 警方jǐng fāng jǐng fāng 在zài zài 紧急情况jǐn jí qíng kuàng jǐn jí qíng kuàng 下xià xià 无需wú xū wú xū 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng 即可jí kě jí kě 采取行动cǎi qǔ xíng dòng cǎi qǔ xíng dòng ,, , 前提qián tí qián tí 是shì shì 他们tā men tā men 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 怀疑huái yí huái yí 存在cún zài cún zài "" " 迫在眉睫pò zài méi jié pò zài méi jié 的de de 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 暴力bào lì bào lì 或huò huò 财产损失cái chǎn sǔn shī cái chǎn sǔn shī "" " ,, , 并bìng bìng 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng 不bù bù 可行kě xíng kě xíng [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
-- - 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 紧急措施jǐn jí cuò shī jǐn jí cuò shī 必须bì xū bì xū 事后shì hòu shì hòu 由yóu yóu 司法官员sī fǎ guān yuán sī fǎ guān yuán 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
-- - 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 是shì shì 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 怀疑huái yí huái yí "" " 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 犯罪fàn zuì fàn zuì "" " (( ( 定义dìng yì dìng yì 为wèi wèi 任何rèn hé rèn hé 刑罚xíng fá xíng fá 超过chāo guò chāo guò 33 3 年nián nián 的de de 罪行zuì xíng zuì xíng )) ) ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 实际shí jì shí jì 犯罪fàn zuì fàn zuì 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
"" " 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 怀疑huái yí huái yí "" " 的de de 门槛mén kǎn mén kǎn 明显míng xiǎn míng xiǎn 较jiào jiào 低且dī qiě dī qiě 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn ,, , 但dàn dàn 在zài zài 正常zhèng cháng zhèng cháng 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 下xià xià 技术jì shù jì shù 上shàng shàng 仍réng réng 需要xū yào xū yào 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng 。。 。
** * ** * 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 在zài zài 交予jiāo yǔ jiāo yǔ 中立zhōng lì zhōng lì 议员yì yuán yì yuán 审查shěn chá shěn chá "" " 仅数jǐn shù jǐn shù 小时xiǎo shí xiǎo shí "" " 后hòu hòu 即jí jí 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 表决biǎo jué biǎo jué —— — —— — 属实shǔ shí shǔ shí :: : ** * ** *
该gāi gāi 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 在zài zài "" " 不到bú dào bú dào 2424 24 小时xiǎo shí xiǎo shí 内nèi nèi "" " 快速kuài sù kuài sù 通过tōng guò tōng guò 了le le 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 两院liǎng yuàn liǎng yuàn ,, , 并于bìng yú bìng yú 20212021 2021 年nián nián 88 8 月yuè yuè 2525 25 日rì rì 通过tōng guò tōng guò [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
这zhè zhè 一点yì diǎn yì diǎn 在zài zài 多个duō gè duō gè 来源lái yuán lái yuán 中zhōng zhōng 得到dé dào dé dào 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 、、 、 [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
审查shěn chá shěn chá 期qī qī 短暂duǎn zàn duǎn zàn 的de de 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 属实shǔ shí shǔ shí 。。 。
** * ** * 由yóu yóu 情报机构qíng bào jī gòu qíng bào jī gòu 审查shěn chá shěn chá 但dàn dàn 未wèi wèi 由yóu yóu 隐私yǐn sī yǐn sī 倡导者chàng dǎo zhě chàng dǎo zhě 审查shěn chá shěn chá —— — —— — 部分bù fèn bù fèn 属实shǔ shí shǔ shí 但dàn dàn 不bù bù 完整wán zhěng wán zhěng :: : ** * ** *
议会yì huì yì huì 人权rén quán rén quán 联合lián hé lián hé 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 确实què shí què shí 发布fā bù fā bù 了le le 一份yī fèn yī fèn 报告bào gào bào gào ,, , 对duì duì 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 关切guān qiè guān qiè 事项shì xiàng shì xiàng 提出tí chū tí chū 警示jǐng shì jǐng shì [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
虽然suī rán suī rán 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 正确zhèng què zhèng què 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū 隐私yǐn sī yǐn sī 倡导者chàng dǎo zhě chàng dǎo zhě 未wèi wèi 参与cān yù cān yù 正式zhèng shì zhèng shì 审查shěn chá shěn chá 程序chéng xù chéng xù ,, , 但dàn dàn 议会yì huì yì huì 人权rén quán rén quán 联合lián hé lián hé 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 了le le 议会yì huì yì huì 对duì duì 人权rén quán rén quán 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 的de de 审查shěn chá shěn chá 。。 。
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 独立dú lì dú lì 的de de 公民自由gōng mín zì yóu gōng mín zì yóu 和hé hé 数字shù zì shù zì 权利quán lì quán lì 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 提交tí jiāo tí jiāo 了le le 详尽xiáng jìn xiáng jìn 的de de 意见书yì jiàn shū yì jiàn shū ,, , 提出tí chū tí chū 的de de 关切guān qiè guān qiè 未wèi wèi 被bèi bèi 正式zhèng shì zhèng shì 纳入nà rù nà rù 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 、、 、 [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 数据shù jù shù jù 干扰gān rǎo gān rǎo 权力quán lì quán lì 与yǔ yǔ 双shuāng shuāng 因素yīn sù yīn sù 认证rèn zhèng rèn zhèng —— — —— — 属实shǔ shí shǔ shí :: : ** * ** *
该gāi gāi 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 确实què shí què shí 允许yǔn xǔ yǔn xǔ 警方jǐng fāng jǐng fāng "" " 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi 、、 、 添加tiān jiā tiān jiā 、、 、 复制fù zhì fù zhì 或huò huò 删除shān chú shān chú 数据shù jù shù jù "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 、、 、 [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] ,, , 从技术上cóng jì shù shàng cóng jì shù shàng 说shuō shuō 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ 移除yí chú yí chú 账户zhàng hù zhàng hù 的de de 双shuāng shuāng 因素yīn sù yīn sù 认证rèn zhèng rèn zhèng 。。 。
这是zhè shì zhè shì 安全ān quán ān quán 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 和hé hé 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 分析师fēn xī shī fēn xī shī 提出tí chū tí chū 的de de 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 关切guān qiè guān qiè [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * "" " 违背wéi bèi wéi bèi 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 自己zì jǐ zì jǐ 的de de 审查shěn chá shěn chá "" " —— — —— — 无法wú fǎ wú fǎ 核实hé shí hé shí :: : ** * ** *
该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 提到tí dào tí dào 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 对duì duì 入侵rù qīn rù qīn 权力quán lì quán lì 的de de 审查shěn chá shěn chá 。。 。
独立国家dú lì guó jiā dú lì guó jiā 安全ān quán ān quán 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 监察员jiān chá yuán jiān chá yuán (( ( INSLMINSLM INSLM )) ) 最近zuì jìn zuì jìn 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 的de de 法定fǎ dìng fǎ dìng 审查shěn chá shěn chá 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn 该gāi gāi 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 执行zhí xíng zhí xíng 存在cún zài cún zài 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 问题wèn tí wèn tí ,, , 认定rèn dìng rèn dìng "" " 在zài zài 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 保障bǎo zhàng bǎo zhàng 措施cuò shī cuò shī 的de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 下xià xià 授予shòu yǔ shòu yǔ 入侵rù qīn rù qīn 权力quán lì quán lì "" " ,, , 并bìng bìng 查明chá míng chá míng 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng 由yóu yóu 未经wèi jīng wèi jīng 培训péi xùn péi xùn 的de de 人员rén yuán rén yuán 颁发bān fā bān fā [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 这次zhè cì zhè cì 审查shěn chá shěn chá 发生fā shēng fā shēng 在zài zài 20242024 2024 -- - 20252025 2025 年nián nián ,, , 即jí jí 在zài zài 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 通过tōng guò tōng guò 后hòu hòu ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 之前zhī qián zhī qián 。。 。
我wǒ wǒ 无法wú fǎ wú fǎ 找到zhǎo dào zhǎo dào 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 证明zhèng míng zhèng míng 存在cún zài cún zài 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 前qián qián 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 该gāi gāi 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 的de de 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 审查shěn chá shěn chá 。。 。

缺失背景

** * ** * 11 1 .. . 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 与yǔ yǔ 司法sī fǎ sī fǎ 监督jiān dū jiān dū :: : ** * ** *
**1.
虽然suī rán suī rán 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 强调qiáng diào qiáng diào 无证wú zhèng wú zhèng 监视jiān shì jiān shì 的de de 可能性kě néng xìng kě néng xìng ,, , 但dàn dàn 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le 司法官员sī fǎ guān yuán sī fǎ guān yuán 在zài zài 正常zhèng cháng zhèng cháng 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 下xià xià 必须bì xū bì xū 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
Warrant Requirements and Judicial Oversight:** While the claim emphasizes warrantless surveillance possibilities, it omits that judicial officers must approve warrants under normal circumstances [1].
根据gēn jù gēn jù 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 声明shēng míng shēng míng ,, , 该gāi gāi 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò "" " 强有力qiáng yǒu lì qiáng yǒu lì 的de de 保障bǎo zhàng bǎo zhàng 措施cuò shī cuò shī ,, , 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 监督jiān dū jiān dū 和hé hé 控制kòng zhì kòng zhì "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] ,, , 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 批评者pī píng zhě pī píng zhě 质疑zhì yí zhì yí 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 保障bǎo zhàng bǎo zhàng 措施cuò shī cuò shī 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 充分chōng fèn chōng fèn 。。 。
The Act includes "strong safeguards, including oversight and controls" according to government statements [1], though critics dispute whether these safeguards are adequate. **2.
** * ** * 22 2 .. . "" " 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 犯罪fàn zuì fàn zuì "" " 的de de 定义dìng yì dìng yì 比bǐ bǐ 暗示àn shì àn shì 的de de 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn :: : ** * ** *
The Definition of "Serious Crime" is Broader Than Implied:** The claim frames this as targeting serious criminals, but "serious crime" is defined as any offence with penalty >3 years, which includes tax evasion, certain whistleblowing activities, forging postage stamps, and polygamy [3].
该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 将jiāng jiāng 其qí qí 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 为wèi wèi 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 犯罪分子fàn zuì fèn zǐ fàn zuì fèn zǐ ,, , 但dàn dàn "" " 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 犯罪fàn zuì fàn zuì "" " 被bèi bèi 定义dìng yì dìng yì 为wèi wèi 任何rèn hé rèn hé 刑罚xíng fá xíng fá 超过chāo guò chāo guò 33 3 年nián nián 的de de 罪行zuì xíng zuì xíng ,, , 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 逃税táo shuì táo shuì 、、 、 某些mǒu xiē mǒu xiē 举报jǔ bào jǔ bào 活动huó dòng huó dòng 、、 、 伪造wěi zào wěi zào 邮票yóu piào yóu piào 和hé hé 一夫多妻yī fū duō qī yī fū duō qī [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
This dramatically expands the scope of who could be targeted. **3.
这zhè zhè 大大dà dà dà dà 扩展kuò zhǎn kuò zhǎn 了le le 可能kě néng kě néng 被bèi bèi 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 者zhě zhě 的de de 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi 。。 。
Parliamentary Scrutiny Did Occur:** The Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills raised concerns about potential "unduly trepass on personal rights and liberties" in February 2021 [4].
** * ** * 33 3 .. . 议会yì huì yì huì 审查shěn chá shěn chá 确实què shí què shí 发生fā shēng fā shēng :: : ** * ** *
The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights issued a detailed human rights scrutiny report [3].
法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 审查shěn chá shěn chá 常设cháng shè cháng shè 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 于yú yú 20212021 2021 年nián nián 22 2 月yuè yuè 对duì duì 潜在qián zài qián zài "" " 过度guò dù guò dù 侵犯qīn fàn qīn fàn 个人gè rén gè rén 权利quán lì quán lì 和hé hé 自由zì yóu zì yóu "" " 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 关切guān qiè guān qiè [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
Some amendments were made in response to House of Representatives concerns [4]. **4.
议会yì huì yì huì 人权rén quán rén quán 联合lián hé lián hé 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 发布fā bù fā bù 了le le 详细xiáng xì xiáng xì 的de de 人权rén quán rén quán 审查shěn chá shěn chá 报告bào gào bào gào [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
Labor Voted for the Legislation:** A critical omission from the mdavis.xyz source is that Labor supported the bill.
针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 众议院zhòng yì yuàn zhòng yì yuàn 关切guān qiè guān qiè 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 了le le 一些yī xiē yī xiē 修正xiū zhèng xiū zhèng [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
As Crikey reported: "The Coalition and Labor have waved through a law that will give police a new set of powers" and "both the government and Labor voted to pass a controversial bill" [2].
** * ** * 44 4 .. . LaborLabor Labor 党dǎng dǎng 投票tóu piào tóu piào 支持zhī chí zhī chí 该gāi gāi 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ :: : ** * ** *
Labor provided bipartisan support, which is significant context for evaluating partisan criticism. **5.
mdavismdavis mdavis .. . xyzxyz xyz 来源lái yuán lái yuán 的de de 一个yí gè yí gè 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 是shì shì LaborLabor Labor 党dǎng dǎng 支持zhī chí zhī chí 该gāi gāi 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 。。 。
Statutory Review Found Serious Implementation Problems:** A 2024-2025 review by the Independent National Security Legislation Monitor found that the main safeguard (warrant approval process) was never effectively implemented [5].
正如zhèng rú zhèng rú CrikeyCrikey Crikey 报道bào dào bào dào :: : "" " CoalitionCoalition Coalition 和hé hé LaborLabor Labor 已经yǐ jīng yǐ jīng 通过tōng guò tōng guò 了le le 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng 将jiāng jiāng 赋予fù yǔ fù yǔ 警方jǐng fāng jǐng fāng 新xīn xīn 权力quán lì quán lì 的de de 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ "" " ,, , "" " 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 和hé hé LaborLabor Labor 都dōu dōu 投票tóu piào tóu piào 通过tōng guò tōng guò 了le le 这项zhè xiàng zhè xiàng 有yǒu yǒu 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì 的de de 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
However, this confirms ex-post facto that the concerns were justified, rather than representing a pre-existing government review. **6.
LaborLabor Labor 提供tí gōng tí gōng 了le le bipartisanbipartisan bipartisan 支持zhī chí zhī chí ,, , 这zhè zhè 对duì duì 评估píng gū píng gū 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 批评pī píng pī píng 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 意义yì yì yì yì 。。 。
Privacy Advocates Were Not Completely Excluded:** Civil liberties groups like the Human Rights Law Centre, Digital Rights Watch, and the Internet Association of Australia made detailed submissions to parliamentary inquiries [3].
** * ** * 55 5 .. . 法定fǎ dìng fǎ dìng 审查shěn chá shěn chá 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 执行zhí xíng zhí xíng 问题wèn tí wèn tí :: : ** * ** *
They were not part of the formal legislative review process, but their input was available to decision-makers.
独立国家dú lì guó jiā dú lì guó jiā 安全ān quán ān quán 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 监察员jiān chá yuán jiān chá yuán 在zài zài 20242024 2024 -- - 20252025 2025 年nián nián 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 的de de 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng 审查shěn chá shěn chá 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn ,, , 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 保障bǎo zhàng bǎo zhàng 措施cuò shī cuò shī (( ( 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn 程序chéng xù chéng xù )) ) 从未cóng wèi cóng wèi 得到dé dào dé dào 有效yǒu xiào yǒu xiào 执行zhí xíng zhí xíng [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 这zhè zhè 事后shì hòu shì hòu 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí 了le le 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 关切guān qiè guān qiè 是shì shì 正当zhèng dāng zhèng dāng 的de de ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 预先yù xiān yù xiān 存在cún zài cún zài 的de de 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 审查shěn chá shěn chá 。。 。
** * ** * 66 6 .. . 隐私yǐn sī yǐn sī 倡导者chàng dǎo zhě chàng dǎo zhě 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 完全wán quán wán quán 被bèi bèi 排除pái chú pái chú :: : ** * ** *
人权rén quán rén quán 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn 、、 、 数字shù zì shù zì 权利quán lì quán lì 观察站guān chá zhàn guān chá zhàn 和hé hé 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 互联网hù lián wǎng hù lián wǎng 协会xié huì xié huì 等děng děng 公民自由gōng mín zì yóu gōng mín zì yóu 团体tuán tǐ tuán tǐ 向xiàng xiàng 议会yì huì yì huì 调查diào chá diào chá 提交tí jiāo tí jiāo 了le le 详细xiáng xì xiáng xì 的de de 意见书yì jiàn shū yì jiàn shū [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
他们tā men tā men 未wèi wèi 参与cān yù cān yù 正式zhèng shì zhèng shì 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 审查shěn chá shěn chá 程序chéng xù chéng xù ,, , 但dàn dàn 他们tā men tā men 的de de 意见yì jiàn yì jiàn 可kě kě 供gōng gōng 决策者jué cè zhě jué cè zhě 参考cān kǎo cān kǎo 。。 。

来源可信度评估

** * ** * 提供tí gōng tí gōng 的de de 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán :: : ** * ** *
**Original Sources Provided:** - **Infosecurity Magazine**: Mainstream cybersecurity/tech publication [1] - **The Guardian Australia**: Reputable mainstream news outlet [2] - **ACS (Australian Computer Society)**: Professional association, credible technology source [3] - **Digital Rights Watch**: Advocacy organisation focused on digital rights; likely to emphasize privacy concerns but generally factual [4] - **Sydney Criminal Lawyers**: Legal practitioners' perspective; has commercial interest in security law issues but provides substantive legal analysis [5] These sources range from mainstream news to advocacy organisations.
-- - ** * ** * InfosecurityInfosecurity Infosecurity MagazineMagazine Magazine ** * ** * :: : 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 网络安全wǎng luò ān quán wǎng luò ān quán // / 技术jì shù jì shù 出版物chū bǎn wù chū bǎn wù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
Digital Rights Watch and Sydney Criminal Lawyers have clear perspectives on civil liberties, but their factual claims about the legislation are supported by parliamentary records and government documents. **mdavis.xyz Source Assessment:** The original claim comes from a Labor-aligned source critical of Coalition government.
-- - ** * ** * TheThe The GuardianGuardian Guardian AustraliaAustralia Australia ** * ** * :: : 知名zhī míng zhī míng 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
The criticism is substantively based on documented legislative provisions and is shared by many legal experts and civil rights organisations.
-- - ** * ** * ACSACS ACS (( ( 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 计算机jì suàn jī jì suàn jī 协会xié huì xié huì )) ) ** * ** * :: : 专业zhuān yè zhuān yè 协会xié huì xié huì ,, , 可信kě xìn kě xìn 技术jì shù jì shù 来源lái yuán lái yuán [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
However, the frame presents the legislation as exclusively a Coalition problem without acknowledging Labor's bipartisan support.
-- - ** * ** * DigitalDigital Digital RightsRights Rights WatchWatch Watch ** * ** * :: : 专注zhuān zhù zhuān zhù 于yú yú 数字shù zì shù zì 权利quán lì quán lì 的de de 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī ;; ; 可能kě néng kě néng 强调qiáng diào qiáng diào 隐私yǐn sī yǐn sī 关切guān qiè guān qiè ,, , 但dàn dàn 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 事实shì shí shì shí 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què [[ [ 44 4 ]] ]
-- - ** * ** * SydneySydney Sydney CriminalCriminal Criminal LawyersLawyers Lawyers ** * ** * :: : 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 从业者cóng yè zhě cóng yè zhě 视角shì jiǎo shì jiǎo ;; ; 在zài zài 安全ān quán ān quán 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 问题wèn tí wèn tí 上shàng shàng 存在cún zài cún zài 商业利益shāng yè lì yì shāng yè lì yì ,, , 但dàn dàn 提供tí gōng tí gōng 实质性shí zhì xìng shí zhì xìng 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 分析fēn xī fēn xī [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 来源lái yuán lái yuán 涵盖hán gài hán gài 从cóng cóng 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 到dào dào 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 。。 。
DigitalDigital Digital RightsRights Rights WatchWatch Watch 和hé hé SydneySydney Sydney CriminalCriminal Criminal LawyersLawyers Lawyers 对duì duì 公民自由gōng mín zì yóu gōng mín zì yóu 持有chí yǒu chí yǒu 明确míng què míng què 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng ,, , 但dàn dàn 关于guān yú guān yú 该gāi gāi 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 的de de 事实shì shí shì shí 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 得到dé dào dé dào 议会yì huì yì huì 记录jì lù jì lù 和hé hé 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 的de de 支持zhī chí zhī chí 。。 。
** * ** * mdavismdavis mdavis .. . xyzxyz xyz 来源lái yuán lái yuán 评估píng gū píng gū :: : ** * ** *
原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 来自lái zì lái zì 一个yí gè yí gè 支持zhī chí zhī chí LaborLabor Labor 、、 、 批评pī píng pī píng CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 来源lái yuán lái yuán 。。 。
该gāi gāi 批评pī píng pī píng 基于jī yú jī yú 有yǒu yǒu 记录jì lù jì lù 的de de 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 条款tiáo kuǎn tiáo kuǎn ,, , 得到dé dào dé dào 许多xǔ duō xǔ duō 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 和hé hé 公民权利gōng mín quán lì gōng mín quán lì 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 的de de 认同rèn tóng rèn tóng 。。 。
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 该gāi gāi 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 将jiāng jiāng 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 为wèi wèi 完全wán quán wán quán 是shì shì CoalitionCoalition Coalition 的de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí ,, , 未wèi wèi 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn LaborLabor Labor 的de de bipartisanbipartisan bipartisan 支持zhī chí zhī chí 。。 。
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 党dǎng dǎng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 支持zhī chí zhī chí 这项zhè xiàng zhè xiàng 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ ?? ?
**Did Labor Support This Legislation?** Yes.
** * ** *
The Crikey article explicitly states: "The Coalition and Labor have waved through a law that will give police a new set of powers to surveil and take action against Australians suspected of committing crimes" [2].
是shì shì 的de de 。。 。
Labor opposition leader Anthony Albanese and the Labor party voted for the legislation, providing crucial bipartisan support that enabled passage with crossbench opposition [2]. **Labor's Surveillance Legislation History:** The Labor government (2007-2013) under Rudd and Gillard did NOT introduce broad hacking powers equivalent to the Identify and Disrupt Act.
CrikeyCrikey Crikey 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 明确指出míng què zhǐ chū míng què zhǐ chū :: : "" " CoalitionCoalition Coalition 和hé hé LaborLabor Labor 已经yǐ jīng yǐ jīng 通过tōng guò tōng guò 了le le 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng 将jiāng jiāng 赋予fù yǔ fù yǔ 警方jǐng fāng jǐng fāng 监视jiān shì jiān shì 和hé hé 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 涉嫌犯罪shè xián fàn zuì shè xián fàn zuì 澳大利亚人ào dà lì yà rén ào dà lì yà rén 采取行动cǎi qǔ xíng dòng cǎi qǔ xíng dòng 的de de 新xīn xīn 权力quán lì quán lì "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
However, the broader context of government surveillance expansion shows this is not unique to the Coalition: - In 2015, the Abbott Coalition government introduced data retention legislation (Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment (Data Retention) Act 2015) which also received bipartisan support from Labor after amendments were made [6] - The surveillance debate in Australia has been bipartisan over decades, with both major parties supporting incremental expansions of law enforcement powers - Labor opposition to the Identify and Disrupt Act was not categorical - they supported it while requesting amendments [2] **Key Distinction:** This legislation appears to represent a genuine advancement in police hacking powers compared to previous legislation.
LaborLabor Labor 反对党fǎn duì dǎng fǎn duì dǎng 领袖lǐng xiù lǐng xiù AnthonyAnthony Anthony AlbaneseAlbanese Albanese 和hé hé LaborLabor Labor 党dǎng dǎng 投票tóu piào tóu piào 支持zhī chí zhī chí 该gāi gāi 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ ,, , 提供tí gōng tí gōng 了le le 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 的de de bipartisanbipartisan bipartisan 支持zhī chí zhī chí ,, , 使得shǐ de shǐ de 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 存在cún zài cún zài 中立zhōng lì zhōng lì 议员yì yuán yì yuán 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì ,, , 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 仍réng réng 得以dé yǐ dé yǐ 通过tōng guò tōng guò [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The data disruption (modification/deletion) and account takeover capabilities are more intrusive than previous powers [3].
** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 党dǎng dǎng 的de de 监控jiān kòng jiān kòng 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ :: : ** * ** *
However, the legislation's passage with bipartisan support suggests broad government acceptance of surveillance expansion, not uniquely Coalition policy.
LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ (( ( 20072007 2007 -- - 20132013 2013 )) ) 在zài zài 陆克文lù kè wén lù kè wén 和hé hé 吉拉德jí lā dé jí lā dé 领导lǐng dǎo lǐng dǎo 下xià xià 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù 与yǔ yǔ 《《 《 识别shí bié shí bié 与yǔ yǔ 阻断zǔ duàn zǔ duàn 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 》》 》 相当xiāng dāng xiāng dāng 的de de 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 入侵rù qīn rù qīn 权力quán lì quán lì 。。 。
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 监视jiān shì jiān shì 扩大kuò dà kuò dà 的de de 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 这zhè zhè 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu :: :
-- - 20152015 2015 年nián nián ,, , 艾博特ài bó tè ài bó tè CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù 了le le 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ (( ( 《《 《 电信diàn xìn diàn xìn (( ( 截获jié huò jié huò 与yǔ yǔ 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ )) ) 修正案xiū zhèng àn xiū zhèng àn (( ( 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú )) ) 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 20152015 2015 》》 》 )) ) ,, , 在zài zài 做出zuò chū zuò chū 修正xiū zhèng xiū zhèng 后hòu hòu 也yě yě 获得huò dé huò dé LaborLabor Labor 的de de bipartisanbipartisan bipartisan 支持zhī chí zhī chí [[ [ 66 6 ]] ]
-- - 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 的de de 监视jiān shì jiān shì 辩论biàn lùn biàn lùn 几十年jǐ shí nián jǐ shí nián 来lái lái 一直yì zhí yì zhí 是shì shì bipartisanbipartisan bipartisan 的de de ,, , 两大liǎng dà liǎng dà 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 都dōu dōu 支持zhī chí zhī chí 逐步zhú bù zhú bù 扩大kuò dà kuò dà 执法zhí fǎ zhí fǎ 权力quán lì quán lì
-- - LaborLabor Labor 对duì duì 《《 《 识别shí bié shí bié 与yǔ yǔ 阻断zǔ duàn zǔ duàn 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 》》 》 的de de 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 绝对jué duì jué duì —— — —— — 他们tā men tā men 在zài zài 请求qǐng qiú qǐng qiú 修正xiū zhèng xiū zhèng 后hòu hòu 予以yǔ yǐ yǔ yǐ 支持zhī chí zhī chí [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 区别qū bié qū bié :: : ** * ** *
与yǔ yǔ 之前zhī qián zhī qián 的de de 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 相比xiāng bǐ xiāng bǐ ,, , 这项zhè xiàng zhè xiàng 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 似乎sì hū sì hū 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 了le le 警方jǐng fāng jǐng fāng 入侵rù qīn rù qīn 权力quán lì quán lì 的de de 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 进步jìn bù jìn bù 。。 。
数据shù jù shù jù 干扰gān rǎo gān rǎo (( ( 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi // / 删除shān chú shān chú )) ) 和hé hé 账户zhàng hù zhàng hù 接管jiē guǎn jiē guǎn 能力néng lì néng lì 比bǐ bǐ 之前zhī qián zhī qián 权力quán lì quán lì 更具gèng jù gèng jù 侵入qīn rù qīn rù 性xìng xìng [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 该gāi gāi 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 获得huò dé huò dé bipartisanbipartisan bipartisan 支持zhī chí zhī chí 通过tōng guò tōng guò 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 对duì duì 监视jiān shì jiān shì 扩大kuò dà kuò dà 的de de 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 接受jiē shòu jiē shòu ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

** * ** * 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 批评pī píng pī píng :: : ** * ** *
**Valid Criticisms:** 1. **Warrant Safeguards Were Inadequate**: The 2024-2025 INSLM review found that the main safeguard (warrant approval process) was never properly implemented and warrants were being issued by untrained individuals [5].
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng 保障bǎo zhàng bǎo zhàng 措施cuò shī cuò shī 不足bù zú bù zú ** * ** * :: : 20242024 2024 -- - 20252025 2025 年nián nián INSLMINSLM INSLM 审查shěn chá shěn chá 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn ,, , 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 保障bǎo zhàng bǎo zhàng 措施cuò shī cuò shī (( ( 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn 程序chéng xù chéng xù )) ) 从未cóng wèi cóng wèi 得到dé dào dé dào 妥善tuǒ shàn tuǒ shàn 执行zhí xíng zhí xíng ,, , 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng 由yóu yóu 未经wèi jīng wèi jīng 培训péi xùn péi xùn 的de de 人员rén yuán rén yuán 颁发bān fā bān fā [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
This validates early concerns about insufficient safeguards. 2. **Broad Scope of "Serious Crime"**: The definition includes minor offences unrelated to cyber-crime, meaning the powers could be used for investigation of tax evasion, whistleblowing, or financial crimes [3]. 3. **Limited Redress for Wrongful Access**: There is no power for judicial officers to order destruction of wrongfully obtained data [3], and subjects of warrants are not informed they were targeted [3]. 4. **Data Modification Enables Framing**: The ability to modify or delete data before investigation raises evidentiary concerns, including potential for planting or destroying evidence [3]. **Government/Law Enforcement Justifications:** 1. **Addressing Modern Cybercrime**: The government argued the legislation was necessary to combat "serious cyber-enabled crime" including dark web criminal activity [4].
这zhè zhè 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí 了le le 早期zǎo qī zǎo qī 对duì duì 保障bǎo zhàng bǎo zhàng 措施cuò shī cuò shī 不足bù zú bù zú 的de de 关切guān qiè guān qiè 。。 。
Law enforcement faced genuine challenges with criminals using anonymising technologies. 2. **Warrant Requirements Exist**: While thresholds are low, warrants still require judicial approval in normal circumstances [1].
22 2 .. . ** * ** * "" " 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 犯罪fàn zuì fàn zuì "" " 的de de 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn ** * ** * :: : 该gāi gāi 定义dìng yì dìng yì 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 与yǔ yǔ 网络wǎng luò wǎng luò 犯罪fàn zuì fàn zuì 无关wú guān wú guān 的de de 轻微qīng wēi qīng wēi 罪行zuì xíng zuì xíng ,, , 意味着yì wèi zhe yì wèi zhe 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 权力quán lì quán lì 可kě kě 用于yòng yú yòng yú 调查diào chá diào chá 逃税táo shuì táo shuì 、、 、 举报jǔ bào jǔ bào 或huò huò 金融jīn róng jīn róng 犯罪fàn zuì fàn zuì [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
Emergency authorisation without warrants requires urgent circumstances (imminent violence/damage) [3]. 3. **Oversight Mechanisms**: The legislation includes requirements for oversight by authorising officers and retrospective judicial review of emergency authorisations [3]. 4. **Targeted at Serious Offences**: While the definition is broad, the stated purpose is targeting terrorism, drug trafficking, human trafficking, and child sexual abuse [4]. **Comparable International Context:** Similar hacking/data disruption powers have been introduced in other democracies: - The UK's Investigatory Powers Act 2016 ("Snoopers' Charter") provides law enforcement with extensive surveillance powers [comparable legislation] - The US has similar capabilities under various federal statutes, though with different oversight mechanisms **Critical Finding on Labor's Role:** The claim presentation suggests this is a "Coalition" problem, but Labor's bipartisan support is material.
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 错误cuò wù cuò wù 访问fǎng wèn fǎng wèn 的de de 救济jiù jì jiù jì 有限yǒu xiàn yǒu xiàn ** * ** * :: : 司法官员sī fǎ guān yuán sī fǎ guān yuán 无权wú quán wú quán 命令mìng lìng mìng lìng 销毁xiāo huǐ xiāo huǐ 错误cuò wù cuò wù 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ 的de de 数据shù jù shù jù [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] ,, , 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng 对象duì xiàng duì xiàng 不会bú huì bú huì 被bèi bèi 告知gào zhī gào zhī 他们tā men tā men 被bèi bèi 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
Labor requested amendments and received some, then voted with the government to pass the legislation.
44 4 .. . ** * ** * 数据shù jù shù jù 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi 导致dǎo zhì dǎo zhì 诬陷wū xiàn wū xiàn 风险fēng xiǎn fēng xiǎn ** * ** * :: : 在zài zài 调查diào chá diào chá 前qián qián 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi 或huò huò 删除shān chú shān chú 数据shù jù shù jù 的de de 能力néng lì néng lì 引发yǐn fā yǐn fā 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 关切guān qiè guān qiè ,, , 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 栽赃zāi zāng zāi zāng 或huò huò 销毁xiāo huǐ xiāo huǐ 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 的de de 可能性kě néng xìng kě néng xìng [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
This makes it a cross-party policy failure (if one views it as problematic) rather than exclusively a Coalition initiative.
** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ // / 执法zhí fǎ zhí fǎ 机构jī gòu jī gòu 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu :: : ** * ** *
The claim's framing obscures Labor's responsibility.
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 应对yìng duì yìng duì 现代xiàn dài xiàn dài 网络wǎng luò wǎng luò 犯罪fàn zuì fàn zuì ** * ** * :: : 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 辩称biàn chēng biàn chēng ,, , 该gāi gāi 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 对于duì yú duì yú 打击dǎ jī dǎ jī 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 暗网àn wǎng àn wǎng 犯罪活动fàn zuì huó dòng fàn zuì huó dòng 在内zài nèi zài nèi 的de de "" " 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 网络wǎng luò wǎng luò 犯罪fàn zuì fàn zuì "" " 是shì shì 必要bì yào bì yào 的de de [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
执法人员zhí fǎ rén yuán zhí fǎ rén yuán 在zài zài 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 匿名nì míng nì míng 技术jì shù jì shù 犯罪分子fàn zuì fèn zǐ fàn zuì fèn zǐ 面前miàn qián miàn qián 面临miàn lín miàn lín 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 的de de 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn 。。 。
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 存在cún zài cún zài ** * ** * :: : 虽然suī rán suī rán 门槛mén kǎn mén kǎn 较jiào jiào 低dī dī ,, , 但dàn dàn 在zài zài 正常zhèng cháng zhèng cháng 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 下xià xià 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng 仍réng réng 需xū xū 司法sī fǎ sī fǎ 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
无证wú zhèng wú zhèng 紧急jǐn jí jǐn jí 授权shòu quán shòu quán 需要xū yào xū yào 紧急情况jǐn jí qíng kuàng jǐn jí qíng kuàng (( ( 迫在眉睫pò zài méi jié pò zài méi jié 的de de 暴力bào lì bào lì // / 损害sǔn hài sǔn hài )) ) [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 监督机制jiān dū jī zhì jiān dū jī zhì ** * ** * :: : 该gāi gāi 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 授权shòu quán shòu quán 官员guān yuán guān yuán 监督jiān dū jiān dū 和hé hé 紧急jǐn jí jǐn jí 授权shòu quán shòu quán 事后shì hòu shì hòu 司法sī fǎ sī fǎ 审查shěn chá shěn chá 的de de 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
44 4 .. . ** * ** * 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 罪行zuì xíng zuì xíng ** * ** * :: : 虽然suī rán suī rán 定义dìng yì dìng yì 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn ,, , 但dàn dàn 声明shēng míng shēng míng 目的mù dì mù dì 是shì shì 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 恐怖主义kǒng bù zhǔ yì kǒng bù zhǔ yì 、、 、 贩毒fàn dú fàn dú 、、 、 人口rén kǒu rén kǒu 贩卖fàn mài fàn mài 和hé hé 儿童ér tóng ér tóng 性虐待xìng nüè dài xìng nüè dài [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 可比kě bǐ kě bǐ 国际背景guó jì bèi jǐng guó jì bèi jǐng :: : ** * ** *
其他qí tā qí tā 民主mín zhǔ mín zhǔ 国家guó jiā guó jiā 也yě yě 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù 了le le 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 入侵rù qīn rù qīn // / 数据shù jù shù jù 干扰gān rǎo gān rǎo 权力quán lì quán lì :: :
-- - 英国yīng guó yīng guó 的de de 《《 《 20162016 2016 年nián nián 调查diào chá diào chá 权力quán lì quán lì 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 》》 》 (( ( "" " 窥探者kuī tàn zhě kuī tàn zhě 宪章xiàn zhāng xiàn zhāng "" " )) ) 赋予fù yǔ fù yǔ 执法zhí fǎ zhí fǎ 部门bù mén bù mén 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 监视jiān shì jiān shì 权力quán lì quán lì [[ [ 可比kě bǐ kě bǐ 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ ]] ]
-- - 美国měi guó měi guó 在zài zài 各种gè zhǒng gè zhǒng 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 法规fǎ guī fǎ guī 下xià xià 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 类似lèi sì lèi sì 能力néng lì néng lì ,, , 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 监督机制jiān dū jī zhì jiān dū jī zhì 不同bù tóng bù tóng
** * ** * 关于guān yú guān yú LaborLabor Labor 角色jué sè jué sè 的de de 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn :: : ** * ** *
该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 的de de 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 暗示àn shì àn shì 这是zhè shì zhè shì "" " CoalitionCoalition Coalition "" " 的de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí ,, , 但dàn dàn LaborLabor Labor 的de de bipartisanbipartisan bipartisan 支持zhī chí zhī chí 是shì shì 关键性guān jiàn xìng guān jiàn xìng 的de de 。。 。
LaborLabor Labor 请求qǐng qiú qǐng qiú 修正xiū zhèng xiū zhèng 并bìng bìng 获得huò dé huò dé 部分bù fèn bù fèn 修正xiū zhèng xiū zhèng ,, , 然后rán hòu rán hòu 与yǔ yǔ 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 一起yì qǐ yì qǐ 投票tóu piào tóu piào 通过tōng guò tōng guò 该gāi gāi 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 。。 。
如果rú guǒ rú guǒ 将jiāng jiāng 其qí qí 视为shì wèi shì wèi 有yǒu yǒu 问题wèn tí wèn tí ,, , 这zhè zhè 使得shǐ de shǐ de 它tā tā 成为chéng wéi chéng wéi 一个yí gè yí gè 跨kuà kuà 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 失败shī bài shī bài ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 完全wán quán wán quán 是shì shì CoalitionCoalition Coalition 的de de 倡议chàng yì chàng yì 。。 。
该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 的de de 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 掩盖yǎn gài yǎn gài 了le le LaborLabor Labor 的de de 责任zé rèn zé rèn 。。 。

部分属实

6.0

/ 10

该gāi gāi 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 确实què shí què shí 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù 了le le 新xīn xīn 的de de 警方jǐng fāng jǐng fāng 权力quán lì quán lì ,, , 可kě kě 访问fǎng wèn fǎng wèn 、、 、 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi 和hé hé 删除shān chú shān chú 设备shè bèi shè bèi 上shàng shàng 的de de 数据shù jù shù jù 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 接管jiē guǎn jiē guǎn 账户zhàng hù zhàng hù 。。 。
The legislation does introduce new police powers to access, modify, and delete data on devices and take over accounts.
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 做出zuò chū zuò chū 几项jǐ xiàng jǐ xiàng 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng 陈述chén shù chén shù :: :
However, the claim makes several misleading statements: 1. **"Without a warrant"** - Misleading.
11 1 .. . ** * ** * "" " 无需wú xū wú xū 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng "" " ** * ** * -- - 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng 。。 。
Warrants are normally required, issued by judicial officers, though the threshold ("reasonable suspicion") is low.
正常zhèng cháng zhèng cháng 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 下xià xià 需要xū yào xū yào 由yóu yóu 司法官员sī fǎ guān yuán sī fǎ guān yuán 颁发bān fā bān fā 的de de 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng ,, , 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 门槛mén kǎn mén kǎn (( ( "" " 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 怀疑huái yí huái yí "" " )) ) 较jiào jiào 低dī dī 。。 。
Only emergency authorisation (imminent violence/damage) can occur without a warrant. 2. **"No warrant even if not suspected of crime"** - Misleading.
只有zhǐ yǒu zhǐ yǒu 紧急jǐn jí jǐn jí 授权shòu quán shòu quán (( ( 迫在眉睫pò zài méi jié pò zài méi jié 的de de 暴力bào lì bào lì // / 损害sǔn hài sǔn hài )) ) 才能cái néng cái néng 在zài zài 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng 的de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 下xià xià 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 。。 。
While the power applies broadly via loose definitions of "serious crime," you must still be subject to reasonable suspicion, not zero suspicion. 3. **"Reviewed by intelligence groups but no privacy advocates"** - Incomplete.
22 2 .. . ** * ** * "" " 即使jí shǐ jí shǐ 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 被bèi bèi 怀疑huái yí huái yí 犯罪fàn zuì fàn zuì 也yě yě 无需wú xū wú xū 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng "" " ** * ** * -- - 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng 。。 。
Parliamentary committees (with human rights scrutiny) reviewed it, and civil society organisations made submissions.
虽然suī rán suī rán 通过tōng guò tōng guò "" " 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 犯罪fàn zuì fàn zuì "" " 的de de 宽松kuān sōng kuān sōng 定义dìng yì dìng yì 权力quán lì quán lì 适用范围shì yòng fàn wéi shì yòng fàn wéi 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn ,, , 但dàn dàn 你nǐ nǐ 仍réng réng 需xū xū 受到shòu dào shòu dào 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 怀疑huái yí huái yí ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 零líng líng 怀疑huái yí huái yí 。。 。
The claim omits this. 4. **"Government's own review into hacking powers"** - Unverified.
33 3 .. . ** * ** * "" " 由yóu yóu 情报机构qíng bào jī gòu qíng bào jī gòu 审查shěn chá shěn chá 但dàn dàn 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 隐私yǐn sī yǐn sī 倡导者chàng dǎo zhě chàng dǎo zhě "" " ** * ** * -- - 不bù bù 完整wán zhěng wán zhěng 。。 。
The INSLM review that found problems occurred after passage in 2024-2025, not before.
议会yì huì yì huì 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì (( ( 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 人权rén quán rén quán 审查shěn chá shěn chá )) ) 对duì duì 其qí qí 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 了le le 审查shěn chá shěn chá ,, , 公民gōng mín gōng mín 社会shè huì shè huì 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 也yě yě 提交tí jiāo tí jiāo 了le le 意见书yì jiàn shū yì jiàn shū 。。 。
I cannot find evidence of a pre-legislation government review that opposed the bill. 5. **Omits Labor Support** - Critical omission.
该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le 这zhè zhè 一点yì diǎn yì diǎn 。。 。
Labor voted for the legislation, providing bipartisan support.
44 4 .. . ** * ** * "" " 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 自己zì jǐ zì jǐ 对duì duì 入侵rù qīn rù qīn 权力quán lì quán lì 的de de 审查shěn chá shěn chá "" " ** * ** * -- - 无法wú fǎ wú fǎ 核实hé shí hé shí 。。 。
The claim frames this as purely Coalition responsibility.
发现fā xiàn fā xiàn 问题wèn tí wèn tí 的de de INSLMINSLM INSLM 审查shěn chá shěn chá 发生fā shēng fā shēng 在zài zài 20242024 2024 -- - 20252025 2025 年nián nián 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 通过tōng guò tōng guò 后hòu hòu ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 之前zhī qián zhī qián 。。 。
The core powers described (data disruption, account takeover, network activity surveillance) are real and were substantively concerning to legal experts and civil rights organisations.
我wǒ wǒ 找zhǎo zhǎo 不到bú dào bú dào 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 证明zhèng míng zhèng míng 存在cún zài cún zài 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 前qián qián 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 该gāi gāi 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 的de de 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 审查shěn chá shěn chá 。。 。
The implementation problems identified by the INSLM review in 2024-2025 validate early concerns.
55 5 .. . ** * ** * 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu LaborLabor Labor 党dǎng dǎng 支持zhī chí zhī chí ** * ** * -- - 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 。。 。
However, the specific claims about warrantless surveillance "without suspicion" are overstated, and the omission of Labor's bipartisan support is a significant framing problem.
LaborLabor Labor 投票tóu piào tóu piào 支持zhī chí zhī chí 该gāi gāi 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ ,, , 提供tí gōng tí gōng bipartisanbipartisan bipartisan 支持zhī chí zhī chí 。。 。
该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 将jiāng jiāng 其qí qí 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 为wèi wèi 完全wán quán wán quán 是shì shì CoalitionCoalition Coalition 的de de 责任zé rèn zé rèn 。。 。
所suǒ suǒ 描述miáo shù miáo shù 的de de 核心hé xīn hé xīn 权力quán lì quán lì (( ( 数据shù jù shù jù 干扰gān rǎo gān rǎo 、、 、 账户zhàng hù zhàng hù 接管jiē guǎn jiē guǎn 、、 、 网络wǎng luò wǎng luò 活动huó dòng huó dòng 监视jiān shì jiān shì )) ) 是shì shì 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 存在cún zài cún zài 的de de ,, , 确实què shí què shí 令lìng lìng 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 和hé hé 公民权利gōng mín quán lì gōng mín quán lì 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 感到gǎn dào gǎn dào 关切guān qiè guān qiè 。。 。
INSLMINSLM INSLM 在zài zài 20242024 2024 -- - 20252025 2025 年nián nián 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn 的de de 执行zhí xíng zhí xíng 问题wèn tí wèn tí 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí 了le le 早期zǎo qī zǎo qī 关切guān qiè guān qiè 。。 。
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 关于guān yú guān yú 无证wú zhèng wú zhèng 监视jiān shì jiān shì "" " 无wú wú 怀疑huái yí huái yí "" " 的de de 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 被bèi bèi 夸大kuā dà kuā dà 了le le ,, , 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu LaborLabor Labor bipartisanbipartisan bipartisan 支持zhī chí zhī chí 是shì shì 一个yí gè yí gè 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 的de de 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 问题wèn tí wèn tí 。。 。

📚 来源与引用 (10)

  1. 1
    Surveillance Legislation Amendment (Identify and Disrupt) Act 2021

    Surveillance Legislation Amendment (Identify and Disrupt) Act 2021

    Home Affairs brings together Australia's federal law enforcement, national and transport security, criminal justice, emergency management, multicultural affairs, settlement services and immigration and border-related functions, working together to keep Australia safe.

    Department of Home Affairs Website
  2. 2
    Tick and flick: Coalition and Labor give police even more hacking powers

    Tick and flick: Coalition and Labor give police even more hacking powers

    A law giving police new powers to surveil and take action against Australians suspected of committing crimes has been waved through.

    Crikey
  3. 3
    Australian Federal Government introduces "absurd" police powers

    Australian Federal Government introduces "absurd" police powers

    Over the last couple of weeks, you may have noticed a swarm of articles discussing the Surveillance Legislation Amendment (Identify and Disrupt) Bill 2021, which blitzed through both Federal Houses of Parliament in under 24 hours and was passed on 25 August 2021. It received Royal Assent on 3 Septem

    Voice Lawyers
  4. 4
    mals.au

    Identify and Disrupt Act - Melbourne Activist Legal Support

    Mals

  5. 5
    innovationaus.com

    Hacking powers handed out without safeguard, review finds

    Innovationaus

  6. 6
    inslm.gov.au

    Identify, takeover and disrupt - special powers of the AFP and ACIC

    Inslm Gov

  7. 7
    digitalrightswatch.org.au

    Australia's new mass surveillance mandate

    Digitalrightswatch Org

  8. 8
    PDF

    Data_retention_PLBIR_final

    Austlii Edu • PDF Document
  9. 9
    New laws extend police power to hack suspects' personal computers

    New laws extend police power to hack suspects' personal computers

    Police power has been extended, allowing the AFP and ACIC to take control of a person’s online accounts and add, copy, delete or alter data.

    Stacks Law Firm
  10. 10
    Surveillance state incoming with Australia's "hacking" bill

    Surveillance state incoming with Australia's "hacking" bill

    Australia’s new “hacking” bill violates privacy and security, and is bound to have global implications.

    Access Now

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。