部分属实

评分: 6.0/10

Coalition
C0028

声明内容

“阻止了与碳信用额度计划效果有关的数据公开,该计划用于改善森林再生。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis

原始来源

事实核查

gāi gāi 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng zài zài 犹义yóu yì yóu yì shàng shàng shì shì ** * ** * 正确zhèng què zhèng què de de ** * ** * 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 实际shí jì shí jì 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 更为gèng wéi gèng wéi 复杂fù zá fù zá
The claim is substantially **TRUE** in the narrow sense that data was withheld, though the situation is more complex than the phrasing suggests.
澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 国立大学guó lì dà xué guó lì dà xué 环境法huán jìng fǎ huán jìng fǎ 教授jiào shòu jiào shòu AndrewAndrew Andrew MacintoshMacintosh Macintosh 先生xiān shēng xiān shēng 曾任céng rèn céng rèn 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 排放pái fàng pái fàng 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 保障bǎo zhàng bǎo zhàng 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì ERACERAC ERAC 主席zhǔ xí zhǔ xí 20222022 2022 nián nián 33 3 yuè yuè 发表fā biǎo fā biǎo le le 同行tóng háng tóng háng 评审píng shěn píng shěn 研究yán jiū yán jiū 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà tàn tàn 信用xìn yòng xìn yòng 额度é dù é dù 计划jì huà jì huà 存在cún zài cún zài 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng de de 完整性wán zhěng xìng wán zhěng xìng 问题wèn tí wèn tí 特别tè bié tè bié shì shì 人工rén gōng rén gōng 引发yǐn fā yǐn fā 森林sēn lín sēn lín 再生zài shēng zài shēng HIRHIR HIR 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
Professor Andrew Macintosh, former head of the government's Emissions Reduction Assurance Committee (ERAC), published peer-reviewed research in March 2022 alleging serious integrity issues with Australia's carbon credit schemes, particularly human-induced forest regeneration (HIR) projects [1].
de de 研究yán jiū yán jiū 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn zài zài duì duì 新南威尔士州xīn nán wēi ěr shì zhōu xīn nán wēi ěr shì zhōu 昆士兰州kūn shì lán zhōu kūn shì lán zhōu de de 119119 119 HIRHIR HIR 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 分析fēn xī fēn xī hòu hòu 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 已经yǐ jīng yǐ jīng 发放fā fàng fā fàng le le 17501750 1750 万个wàn gè wàn gè tàn tàn 信用xìn yòng xìn yòng 额度é dù é dù dàn dàn "" " 森林sēn lín sēn lín 总面积zǒng miàn jī zǒng miàn jī 几乎jī hū jī hū 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 增加zēng jiā zēng jiā "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
His research found that of 119 HIR projects analyzed in NSW and Queensland, despite the government issuing 17.5 million carbon credits, "the total forest area had barely increased" [1].
zài zài 5959 59 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù zhōng zhōng 森林sēn lín sēn lín 面积miàn jī miàn jī 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo le le dàn dàn 它们tā men tā men 仍然réng rán réng rán 获得huò dé huò dé le le 820820 820 万个wàn gè wàn gè 额度é dù é dù 价值jià zhí jià zhí 超过chāo guò chāo guò 11 1 亿美元yì měi yuán yì měi yuán [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
For 59 projects, forest area actually decreased, yet they still received 8.2 million credits worth over $100 million [1].
zài zài 描述miáo shù miáo shù 清洁qīng jié qīng jié 能源néng yuán néng yuán 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 机构jī gòu jī gòu duì duì 数据shù jù shù jù 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng de de 回应huí yìng huí yìng shí shí 卫报wèi bào wèi bào 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū "" " 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 用于yòng yú yòng yú 估算gū suàn gū suàn yīn yīn 再生zài shēng zài shēng ér ér 产生chǎn shēng chǎn shēng de de tàn tàn 储量chǔ liàng chǔ liàng 变化biàn huà biàn huà de de 特定tè dìng tè dìng 森林sēn lín sēn lín 区域qū yù qū yù 数据shù jù shù jù dàn dàn 它们tā men tā men MacintoshMacintosh Macintosh de de 分析fēn xī fēn xī 一致yí zhì yí zhì 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 机构jī gòu jī gòu 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
When describing the Clean Energy Regulator's response to his data claims, the Guardian article states: "Legislation prevented it from releasing data from the specific forest areas that had been used to estimate the change in carbon storage due to regrowth, but they did not match Macintosh's analysis, it said" [1].
然而rán ér rán ér MacintoshMacintosh Macintosh duì duì zhè zhè 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 提出异议tí chū yì yì tí chū yì yì 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū "" " 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ zhōng zhōng 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 任何rèn hé rèn hé 条款tiáo kuǎn tiáo kuǎn 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 机构jī gòu jī gòu 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 地点dì diǎn dì diǎn de de 汇总huì zǒng huì zǒng 数据shù jù shù jù 或者huò zhě huò zhě 删除shān chú shān chú 识别shí bié shí bié 信息xìn xī xìn xī hòu hòu àn àn 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 数据shù jù shù jù "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
However, Macintosh disputed this justification, stating: "there was nothing in the legislation stopping the regulator from releasing the data aggregated across all project sites, or on a project-by-project basis with identifying information removed" [1].
jiāng jiāng 缺乏quē fá quē fá 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 规定guī dìng guī dìng wèi wèi "" " gāi gāi 制度zhì dù zhì dù de de 一个yí gè yí gè 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 问题wèn tí wèn tí "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
He characterized the lack of transparency as "a major problem with the system" [1].
监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 机构jī gòu jī gòu 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 完成wán chéng wán chéng 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng 审查shěn chá shěn chá 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn 本土běn tǔ běn tǔ 森林sēn lín sēn lín 再生zài shēng zài shēng 方法fāng fǎ fāng fǎ de de 合规性hé guī xìng hé guī xìng 水平shuǐ píng shuǐ píng "" " 非常fēi cháng fēi cháng gāo gāo "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The regulator stated it had completed a review finding "a very high" level of compliance with the native forest regeneration method [1].

缺失背景

gāi gāi 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 缺乏quē fá quē fá 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 信息xìn xī xìn xī
Several important contextual points are absent from the claim: 1. **Nature of the alleged suppression**: The claim suggests deliberate, malicious suppression.
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 所谓suǒ wèi suǒ wèi 打压dǎ yā dǎ yā de de 性质xìng zhì xìng zhì ** * ** * gāi gāi 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 暗示àn shì àn shì 故意gù yì gù yì 恶意è yì è yì 打压dǎ yā dǎ yā
However, the Guardian article indicates the regulator cited legislative restrictions rather than a deliberate coverup.
然而rán ér rán ér 卫报wèi bào wèi bào 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 机构jī gòu jī gòu 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng le le 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì ér ér 非故意fēi gù yì fēi gù yì 掩盖yǎn gài yǎn gài
The dispute centers on the *interpretation* of what legislation permits, not on clear evidence of government officials choosing to suppress data [1]. 2. **Competing assessments**: The Clean Energy Regulator's response to Macintosh was direct and specific: they stated his "analytical material provided previously by Professor Macintosh has been refuted by more sophisticated independent analysis" and that they conducted a review finding high compliance levels [1].
争议zhēng yì zhēng yì de de 核心hé xīn hé xīn 在于zài yú zài yú duì duì 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 允许yǔn xǔ yǔn xǔ 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi de de ** * 解读jiě dú jiě dú ** * ér ér 非政府fēi zhèng fǔ fēi zhèng fǔ 官员guān yuán guān yuán 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 掩盖yǎn gài yǎn gài 数据shù jù shù jù de de 明确míng què míng què 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
This represents a genuine technical disagreement about data interpretation, not evidence of conscious suppression. 3. **Macintosh's own compliance role**: Macintosh served as chair of ERAC for over six years before resigning in 2020 when appointed as a royal commissioner.
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 竞争性jìng zhēng xìng jìng zhēng xìng 评估píng gū píng gū ** * ** * 清洁qīng jié qīng jié 能源néng yuán néng yuán 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 机构jī gòu jī gòu duì duì MacintoshMacintosh Macintosh de de 回应huí yìng huí yìng 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē qiě qiě 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 他们tā men tā men 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 先前xiān qián xiān qián 提供tí gōng tí gōng de de "" " MacintoshMacintosh Macintosh 教授jiào shòu jiào shòu de de 分析fēn xī fēn xī 材料cái liào cái liào bèi bèi gèng gèng 复杂fù zá fù zá de de 独立dú lì dú lì 分析fēn xī fēn xī suǒ suǒ 反驳fǎn bó fǎn bó "" " 并且bìng qiě bìng qiě 他们tā men tā men 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng le le 审查shěn chá shěn chá 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn 合规性hé guī xìng hé guī xìng 水平shuǐ píng shuǐ píng hěn hěn gāo gāo [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
He reviewed and signed off on many of these same methodologies while in government [1].
zhè zhè 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo le le duì duì 数据shù jù shù jù 解读jiě dú jiě dú de de 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 技术jì shù jì shù 分歧fēn qí fēn qí ér ér 非故意fēi gù yì fēi gù yì 掩盖yǎn gài yǎn gài de de 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù
The emissions reduction minister questioned whether Macintosh was "now suggesting he provided flawed advice to successive commonwealth cabinet ministers" [1]. 4. **Macintosh's later admission**: The article notes that Macintosh "regretted he had not taken a stronger stance on some issues" during his time on the committee, suggesting the problems he identified developed or became apparent over time [1]. 5. **Data availability complexity**: While specific forest area data was restricted, the regulator continued to conduct and publish reviews of methodology compliance.
33 3 .. . ** * ** * MacintoshMacintosh Macintosh 本人běn rén běn rén de de 合规hé guī hé guī 角色jué sè jué sè ** * ** * MacintoshMacintosh Macintosh céng céng zài zài 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 任职rèn zhí rèn zhí ERACERAC ERAC 主席zhǔ xí zhǔ xí 超过chāo guò chāo guò 六年liù nián liù nián 直到zhí dào zhí dào 20202020 2020 nián nián bèi bèi 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng wèi wèi 皇家huáng jiā huáng jiā 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 委员wěi yuán wěi yuán shí shí 辞职cí zhí cí zhí
Macintosh himself was able to obtain sufficient data to conduct his own analysis of 119 projects [1].
zài zài 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 期间qī jiān qī jiān 审查shěn chá shěn chá bìng bìng 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn le le 许多xǔ duō xǔ duō 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 同样tóng yàng tóng yàng de de 方法fāng fǎ fāng fǎ [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
排放pái fàng pái fàng 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 质疑zhì yí zhì yí MacintoshMacintosh Macintosh 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu "" " 现在xiàn zài xiàn zài 暗示àn shì àn shì xiàng xiàng 历届lì jiè lì jiè 联邦lián bāng lián bāng nèi nèi è è 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 提供tí gōng tí gōng le le yǒu yǒu 缺陷quē xiàn quē xiàn de de 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
44 4 .. . ** * ** * MacintoshMacintosh Macintosh de de 后来hòu lái hòu lái 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn ** * ** * 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū MacintoshMacintosh Macintosh "" " 对于duì yú duì yú zài zài 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 期间qī jiān qī jiān 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu duì duì 某些mǒu xiē mǒu xiē 问题wèn tí wèn tí 采取cǎi qǔ cǎi qǔ gèng gèng 强硬qiáng yìng qiáng yìng de de 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 感到遗憾gǎn dào yí hàn gǎn dào yí hàn "" " 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí shì shì suí suí 时间shí jiān shí jiān 发展fā zhǎn fā zhǎn huò huò 变得biàn dé biàn dé 明显míng xiǎn míng xiǎn de de [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
55 5 .. . ** * ** * 数据shù jù shù jù 可用性kě yòng xìng kě yòng xìng de de 复杂性fù zá xìng fù zá xìng ** * ** * 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 特定tè dìng tè dìng 森林sēn lín sēn lín 区域qū yù qū yù 数据shù jù shù jù 受到限制shòu dào xiàn zhì shòu dào xiàn zhì 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 机构jī gòu jī gòu 继续jì xù jì xù 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng bìng bìng 发布fā bù fā bù 方法fāng fǎ fāng fǎ 合规性hé guī xìng hé guī xìng 审查shěn chá shěn chá
MacintoshMacintosh Macintosh 本人běn rén běn rén 能够néng gòu néng gòu 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ 足够zú gòu zú gòu de de 数据shù jù shù jù lái lái duì duì 119119 119 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 自己zì jǐ zì jǐ de de 分析fēn xī fēn xī [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]

来源可信度评估

** * ** * 卫报wèi bào wèi bào 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà ** * ** * 卫报wèi bào wèi bào shì shì 一家yī jiā yī jiā 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 声誉shēng yù shēng yù 良好liáng hǎo liáng hǎo de de 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 强大qiáng dà qiáng dà de de 调查diào chá diào chá 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn
**Guardian Australia**: The Guardian is a mainstream, reputable news organization with strong investigative journalism standards.
然而rán ér rán ér zhè zhè 篇文章piān wén zhāng piān wén zhāng 涵盖hán gài hán gài le le 一名yī míng yī míng 举报人jǔ bào rén jǔ bào rén 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 机构jī gòu jī gòu 之间zhī jiān zhī jiān de de 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì
However, this article covers a dispute between a whistleblower and government agency.
报道bào dào bào dào de de 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 突出tū chū tū chū 强调qiáng diào qiáng diào le le MacintoshMacintosh Macintosh de de 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng ér ér 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 机构jī gòu jī gòu de de 详细xiáng xì xiáng xì 回应huí yìng huí yìng 相对xiāng duì xiāng duì 简短jiǎn duǎn jiǎn duǎn
The framing emphasizes Macintosh's allegations prominently while the regulator's detailed response is relatively brief.
标题biāo tí biāo tí "" " 基本上jī běn shàng jī běn shàng shì shì 骗局piàn jú piàn jú "" " 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng le le 举报人jǔ bào rén jǔ bào rén zuì zuì 强烈qiáng liè qiáng liè de de 语言yǔ yán yǔ yán
The headline—"largely a sham"—uses the whistleblower's strongest language.
尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 包含bāo hán bāo hán le le 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 机构jī gòu jī gòu de de 回应huí yìng huí yìng dàn dàn 报道bào dào bào dào liàng liàng MacintoshMacintosh Macintosh de de 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng shǎo shǎo [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
While the article includes the regulator's response, it receives less coverage than Macintosh's allegations [1]. **Macintosh's academic papers**: These are peer-reviewed research papers from an ANU environmental law professor.
** * ** * MacintoshMacintosh Macintosh de de 学术论文xué shù lùn wén xué shù lùn wén ** * ** * 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē shì shì 来自lái zì lái zì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 国立大学guó lì dà xué guó lì dà xué 环境法huán jìng fǎ huán jìng fǎ 教授jiào shòu jiào shòu de de 同行tóng háng tóng háng 评审píng shěn píng shěn 研究yán jiū yán jiū 论文lùn wén lùn wén
Macintosh is a credible academic source with expertise in environmental law.
MacintoshMacintosh Macintosh shì shì 一位yī wèi yī wèi 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 环境法huán jìng fǎ huán jìng fǎ 专业知识zhuān yè zhī shí zhuān yè zhī shí de de 可信kě xìn kě xìn 学术xué shù xué shù 来源lái yuán lái yuán
However, his academic work is advancing an advocacy position (that the carbon credit system is fundamentally flawed), which may affect how he frames findings.
然而rán ér rán ér de de 学术xué shù xué shù 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 正在zhèng zài zhèng zài 推进tuī jìn tuī jìn 一个yí gè yí gè 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng tàn tàn 信用xìn yòng xìn yòng 额度é dù é dù 制度zhì dù zhì dù zài zài 根本gēn běn gēn běn shàng shàng 存在cún zài cún zài 缺陷quē xiàn quē xiàn zhè zhè 可能kě néng kě néng huì huì 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng duì duì 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn de de 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 方式fāng shì fāng shì
His dual roles as both whistleblower and critic may introduce bias in interpreting ambiguous data [1]. **Clean Energy Regulator response**: As the government body responsible for the carbon credit system, the regulator has institutional interest in defending its work.
作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 举报人jǔ bào rén jǔ bào rén 批评者pī píng zhě pī píng zhě de de 双重shuāng chóng shuāng chóng 角色jué sè jué sè 可能kě néng kě néng huì huì zài zài 解读jiě dú jiě dú 模糊mó hú mó hú 数据shù jù shù jù shí shí 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù 偏见piān jiàn piān jiàn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
Their claim that Macintosh's analysis was "refuted by more sophisticated independent analysis" needs independent verification.
** * ** * 清洁qīng jié qīng jié 能源néng yuán néng yuán 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 机构jī gòu jī gòu de de 回应huí yìng huí yìng ** * ** * 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 负责fù zé fù zé tàn tàn 信用xìn yòng xìn yòng 额度é dù é dù 制度zhì dù zhì dù de de 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 机构jī gòu jī gòu 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 机构jī gòu jī gòu yǒu yǒu 利益lì yì lì yì 关系guān xì guān xì lái lái 维护wéi hù wéi hù 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò
Their response is brief and doesn't engage deeply with Macintosh's specific allegations [1].
他们tā men tā men 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng MacintoshMacintosh Macintosh de de 分析fēn xī fēn xī bèi bèi "" " gèng gèng 复杂fù zá fù zá de de 独立dú lì dú lì 分析fēn xī fēn xī suǒ suǒ 反驳fǎn bó fǎn bó "" " 需要xū yào xū yào 独立dú lì dú lì 验证yàn zhèng yàn zhèng
他们tā men tā men de de 回应huí yìng huí yìng 简短jiǎn duǎn jiǎn duǎn bìng bìng 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 深入shēn rù shēn rù 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn MacintoshMacintosh Macintosh de de 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做过zuò guò zuò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng
**Did Labor do something similar?** Search conducted: "Labor government carbon credit data suppression transparency" Labor opposed the Coalition's carbon credit approach throughout this period and promised review and reform.
** * ** *
When Labor won government in May 2022 (following this March 2022 article), it commissioned an independent review of the Australian Carbon Credit Units scheme [2].
搜索sōu suǒ sōu suǒ 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng zhōng zhōng "" " 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ tàn tàn 信用xìn yòng xìn yòng 额度é dù é dù 数据shù jù shù jù 打压dǎ yā dǎ yā 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù "" "
However, Labor has not faced comparable allegations of deliberately suppressing carbon credit effectiveness data.
工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 在此期间zài cǐ qī jiān zài cǐ qī jiān 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 联邦lián bāng lián bāng de de tàn tàn 信用xìn yòng xìn yòng 额度é dù é dù 方法fāng fǎ fāng fǎ bìng bìng 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 审查shěn chá shěn chá 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé
Labor's approach was to commit to comprehensive reform rather than to suppress data during their opposition period.
20222022 2022 nián nián 55 5 yuè yuè 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 赢得yíng dé yíng dé 政权zhèng quán zhèng quán 本文běn wén běn wén 发表fā biǎo fā biǎo 20222022 2022 nián nián 33 3 yuè yuè hòu hòu 委托wěi tuō wěi tuō 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng le le 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà tàn tàn 信用xìn yòng xìn yòng 额度é dù é dù 计划jì huà jì huà de de 独立dú lì dú lì 审查shěn chá shěn chá [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
The Labor government under Prime Minister Albanese implemented the "Future Fuels Review" examining carbon markets, though specific data suppression incidents have not been documented [2]. **Key difference**: Labor's approach involved external review and reform advocacy, while the Coalition allegedly restricted data access.
然而rán ér rán ér 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 遭受zāo shòu zāo shòu 故意gù yì gù yì 打压dǎ yā dǎ yā tàn tàn 信用xìn yòng xìn yòng 额度é dù é dù 效果xiào guǒ xiào guǒ 数据shù jù shù jù 相似xiāng sì xiāng sì de de 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng
However, there is no evidence that Labor deliberately suppressed scientific or effectiveness data during their previous periods in government (2007-2013).
工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng de de 方法fāng fǎ fāng fǎ shì shì 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 全面quán miàn quán miàn 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé ér ér fēi fēi zài zài 反对党fǎn duì dǎng fǎn duì dǎng 时期shí qī shí qī 打压dǎ yā dǎ yā 数据shù jù shù jù
zài zài 阿尔巴尼ā ěr bā ní ā ěr bā ní 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ 领导lǐng dǎo lǐng dǎo xià xià de de 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 实施shí shī shí shī le le "" " 未来wèi lái wèi lái 燃料rán liào rán liào 审查shěn chá shěn chá "" " 审查shěn chá shěn chá tàn tàn 市场shì chǎng shì chǎng 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ de de 数据shù jù shù jù 打压dǎ yā dǎ yā 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn 尚未shàng wèi shàng wèi bèi bèi 记录jì lù jì lù [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 差异chā yì chā yì ** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng de de 方法fāng fǎ fāng fǎ 涉及shè jí shè jí 外部wài bù wài bù 审查shěn chá shěn chá 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo ér ér 联邦lián bāng lián bāng bèi bèi 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 数据shù jù shù jù 访问fǎng wèn fǎng wèn
然而rán ér rán ér 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng zài zài 先前xiān qián xiān qián 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 期间qī jiān qī jiān 20072007 2007 -- - 20132013 2013 nián nián 故意gù yì gù yì 打压dǎ yā dǎ yā 科学kē xué kē xué huò huò 效果xiào guǒ xiào guǒ 数据shù jù shù jù
🌐

平衡视角

尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 批评者pī píng zhě pī píng zhě 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ 森林sēn lín sēn lín 再生zài shēng zài shēng 数据shù jù shù jù dàn dàn gèng gèng 全面quán miàn quán miàn de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 更加gèng jiā gèng jiā 细微xì wēi xì wēi
While critics argue the Coalition prevented public access to forest regeneration data, the fuller picture is more nuanced: The government did restrict public access to specific forest location data used in HIR calculations.
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì le le 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ HIRHIR HIR 计算jì suàn jì suàn zhōng zhōng 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng de de 特定tè dìng tè dìng 森林sēn lín sēn lín 位置wèi zhì wèi zhì 数据shù jù shù jù de de 权限quán xiàn quán xiàn
This restriction was justified on legislative grounds—confidentiality protections for project participants [1].
这一zhè yī zhè yī 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì de de 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu shì shì 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 参与者cān yù zhě cān yù zhě de de 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
However, Macintosh argued the regulator could have released aggregated or de-identified data without violating legislation, and that refusing to do so created unjustifiable opacity [1].
然而rán ér rán ér MacintoshMacintosh Macintosh 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 机构jī gòu jī gòu 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ zài zài 违反wéi fǎn wéi fǎn 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng xià xià 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 汇总huì zǒng huì zǒng huò huò 识别shí bié shí bié huà huà 数据shù jù shù jù 拒绝jù jué jù jué 这样zhè yàng zhè yàng zuò zuò 创造chuàng zào chuàng zào le le 不合理bù hé lǐ bù hé lǐ de de 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The regulator's response suggests this was less about suppressing inconvenient findings and more about applying existing confidentiality rules.
监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 机构jī gòu jī gòu de de 回应huí yìng huí yìng 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng zhè zhè gèng gèng duō duō shì shì 关于guān yú guān yú 应用yìng yòng yìng yòng 现有xiàn yǒu xiàn yǒu 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì 规则guī zé guī zé ér ér fēi fēi 打压dǎ yā dǎ yā 不利bù lì bù lì 结果jié guǒ jié guǒ
The regulator maintained that its own independent analysis refuted Macintosh's claims, rather than acknowledging his data proved the system defective [1].
监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 机构jī gòu jī gòu 坚称jiān chēng jiān chēng 独立dú lì dú lì 分析fēn xī fēn xī 反驳fǎn bó fǎn bó le le MacintoshMacintosh Macintosh de de 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng ér ér fēi fēi 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn de de 数据shù jù shù jù 证明zhèng míng zhèng míng 制度zhì dù zhì dù 存在cún zài cún zài 缺陷quē xiàn quē xiàn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
Whether the regulator's interpretation of what legislation permitted was correct or whether it used legislation as cover for avoiding uncomfortable public scrutiny is genuinely contestable. **Key context**: This was not a scenario where a smoking gun report was completed and buried.
监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 机构jī gòu jī gòu duì duì 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 允许yǔn xǔ yǔn xǔ 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi de de 解读jiě dú jiě dú shì shì 正确zhèng què zhèng què de de 还是hái shì hái shì 利用lì yòng lì yòng 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 避免bì miǎn bì miǎn 令人不安lìng rén bù ān lìng rén bù ān de de 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng 审查shěn chá shěn chá de de 掩护yǎn hù yǎn hù 这一zhè yī zhè yī 问题wèn tí wèn tí 尚有shàng yǒu shàng yǒu 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì
Rather, it was an ongoing dispute about: - How to interpret legislative restrictions on data sharing - Whether Macintosh's analysis methodology was sound - What level of transparency was legally required vs. discretionary The fact that Macintosh was able to obtain sufficient data to conduct his own analysis of 119 projects suggests the suppression was not total, though he may have had superior access due to his former government position [1]. **Did government act improperly?** By refusing to release aggregated/de-identified data when Macintosh argued legislation permitted it, the regulator restricted transparency.
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ** * ** * zhè zhè bìng bìng 不是bú shì bú shì 一个yí gè yí gè 完成wán chéng wán chéng de de 权威quán wēi quán wēi 报告bào gào bào gào bèi bèi 埋没mái mò mái mò de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng
Whether this constitutes "preventing the release" of effectiveness data or simply applying confidentiality rules as written is the interpretive dispute.
gèng gèng 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 地说dì shuō dì shuō 这是zhè shì zhè shì 一场yī cháng yī cháng 持续chí xù chí xù de de 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì
-- - 如何rú hé rú hé 解读jiě dú jiě dú 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ duì duì 数据共享shù jù gòng xiǎng shù jù gòng xiǎng de de 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì
-- - MacintoshMacintosh Macintosh de de 分析方法fēn xī fāng fǎ fēn xī fāng fǎ 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 可靠kě kào kě kào
-- - 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú de de 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 水平shuǐ píng shuǐ píng 自由zì yóu zì yóu 裁量权cái liàng quán cái liàng quán 之间zhī jiān zhī jiān de de 差异chā yì chā yì
MacintoshMacintosh Macintosh 能够néng gòu néng gòu 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ 足够zú gòu zú gòu de de 数据shù jù shù jù lái lái duì duì 119119 119 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 自己zì jǐ zì jǐ de de 分析fēn xī fēn xī zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 打压dǎ yā dǎ yā bìng bìng 不是bú shì bú shì 完全wán quán wán quán de de 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 可能kě néng kě néng 由于yóu yú yóu yú 先前xiān qián xiān qián de de 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 职位zhí wèi zhí wèi ér ér 拥有yōng yǒu yōng yǒu gèng gèng gāo gāo de de 访问fǎng wèn fǎng wèn 权限quán xiàn quán xiàn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi 不当bù dàng bù dàng
** * ** * 通过tōng guò tōng guò zài zài MacintoshMacintosh Macintosh 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 允许yǔn xǔ yǔn xǔ de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng xià xià 拒绝jù jué jù jué 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 汇总huì zǒng huì zǒng // / 识别shí bié shí bié huà huà 数据shù jù shù jù 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 机构jī gòu jī gòu 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì le le 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù
zhè zhè 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 构成gòu chéng gòu chéng "" " 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi "" " 效果xiào guǒ xiào guǒ 数据shù jù shù jù 还是hái shì hái shì 只是zhǐ shì zhǐ shì 按照àn zhào àn zhào 书面shū miàn shū miàn 规定guī dìng guī dìng 应用yìng yòng yìng yòng 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì 规则guī zé guī zé 可能kě néng kě néng 必要bì yào bì yào de de gèng gèng 严格yán gé yán gé shì shì 一个yí gè yí gè 解释性jiě shì xìng jiě shì xìng 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì

部分属实

6.0

/ 10

联邦政府lián bāng zhèng fǔ lián bāng zhèng fǔ 通过tōng guò tōng guò 清洁qīng jié qīng jié 能源néng yuán néng yuán 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 机构jī gòu jī gòu 确实què shí què shí 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì le le 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ 森林sēn lín sēn lín 再生zài shēng zài shēng 效果xiào guǒ xiào guǒ 数据shù jù shù jù 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù
The Coalition government (via the Clean Energy Regulator) did restrict public access to forest regeneration effectiveness data, citing legislative confidentiality protections.
然而rán ér rán ér zhè zhè bèi bèi 呈现chéng xiàn chéng xiàn wèi wèi 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ // / 技术jì shù jì shù 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì ér ér 非故意fēi gù yì fēi gù yì 打压dǎ yā dǎ yā 不利bù lì bù lì 结果jié guǒ jié guǒ de de 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù
However, this was presented as a legal/technical restriction rather than evidence of deliberate suppression of inconvenient findings.
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 质疑zhì yí zhì yí 数据shù jù shù jù 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì 计划jì huà jì huà 失败shī bài shī bài 坚称jiān chēng jiān chēng 他们tā men tā men 自己zì jǐ zì jǐ de de 分析fēn xī fēn xī 反驳fǎn bó fǎn bó le le MacintoshMacintosh Macintosh de de 结论jié lùn jié lùn
The government disputed that the data actually showed scheme failure, maintaining their own analysis refuted Macintosh's conclusions.
数据shù jù shù jù 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 适当shì dàng shì dàng huò huò 不必要bù bì yào bù bì yào 透明tòu míng tòu míng shì shì 一个yí gè yí gè 合法hé fǎ hé fǎ de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 辩论biàn lùn biàn lùn dàn dàn gāi gāi 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng de de 措辞cuò cí cuò cí 暗示àn shì àn shì 故意gù yì gù yì 掩盖yǎn gài yǎn gài 不利bù lì bù lì 真相zhēn xiàng zhēn xiàng ér ér fēi fēi 可能kě néng kě néng 必要bì yào bì yào de de gèng gèng 严格yán gé yán gé de de 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì 规则guī zé guī zé 应用yìng yòng yìng yòng
Whether the data restriction was appropriate or unnecessarily opaque is a legitimate policy debate, but the claim's phrasing suggests deliberate coverup of inconvenient truth rather than application of confidentiality rules that may have been more restrictive than necessary.

📚 来源与引用 (2)

  1. 1
    theguardian.com

    theguardian.com

    Prof Andrew Macintosh says the system, which gives credits for projects such as regrowing native forests after clearing, is ‘a fraud’ on taxpayers and consumers

    the Guardian
  2. 2
    theguardian.com

    theguardian.com

    Chris Bowen says Labor wants to ensure system has integrity after whistleblower’s claims

    the Guardian

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。