属实

评分: 7.0/10

Coalition
C0025

声明内容

“拒绝公布COVIDSafe应用程序识别了多少COVID密切接触者的数据。他们表示,报告联邦政府应用程序识别出多少接触者是州政府的职责。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

联邦政府lián bāng zhèng fǔ lián bāng zhèng fǔ 拒绝jù jué jù jué 公布gōng bù gōng bù COVIDSafeCOVIDSafe COVIDSafe 接触jiē chù jiē chù 者zhě zhě 追踪zhuī zōng zhuī zōng 数据shù jù shù jù 的de de 核心hé xīn hé xīn 声明shēng míng shēng míng ** * ** * 基本jī běn jī běn 得到dé dào dé dào 验证yàn zhèng yàn zhèng ** * ** * 。。 。
The core claim that the federal government refused to publish COVIDSafe contact tracing data is **substantially verified**.
根据gēn jù gēn jù ZDNetZDNet ZDNet 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 援引yuán yǐn yuán yǐn 的de de 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn COVIDCOVID COVID -- - 1919 19 特别tè bié tè bié 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 的de de 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ ,, , "" " 联邦政府lián bāng zhèng fǔ lián bāng zhèng fǔ 不bù bù 愿意yuàn yì yuàn yì 提供tí gōng tí gōng 关于guān yú guān yú COVIDSafeCOVIDSafe COVIDSafe 应用程序yìng yòng chéng xù yìng yòng chéng xù 识别shí bié shí bié 了le le 多少duō shǎo duō shǎo 额外é wài é wài 接触jiē chù jiē chù 者zhě zhě 的de de 更新gēng xīn gēng xīn ,, , 而是ér shì ér shì 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 各州gè zhōu gè zhōu 和hé hé 地区dì qū dì qū 有yǒu yǒu 责任zé rèn zé rèn 报告bào gào bào gào 识别shí bié shí bié 出chū chū 的de de 病例bìng lì bìng lì 数量shù liàng shù liàng "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
According to the ZDNet article citing the Senate Select Committee on COVID-19, "the federal government has been unwilling to provide an update on how many additional contacts the COVIDSafe app has identified, choosing to instead claim the states and territories are responsible for reporting the number of cases identified" [1].
参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 于yú yú 20222022 2022 年nián nián 44 4 月yuè yuè 发布fā bù fā bù 的de de 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 报告bào gào bào gào 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn ,, , 在zài zài 20202020 2020 年nián nián 55 5 月yuè yuè 至zhì zhì 1111 11 月yuè yuè 期间qī jiān qī jiān ,, , COVIDSafeCOVIDSafe COVIDSafe 应用程序yìng yòng chéng xù yìng yòng chéng xù 在zài zài 新南威尔士州xīn nán wēi ěr shì zhōu xīn nán wēi ěr shì zhōu 2525 25 ,, , 300300 300 名míng míng 密切接触mì qiè jiē chù mì qiè jiē chù 者zhě zhě 中仅zhōng jǐn zhōng jǐn 识别shí bié shí bié 出chū chū 1717 17 名额míng é míng é 外wài wài 的de de 密切接触mì qiè jiē chù mì qiè jiē chù 者zhě zhě —— — —— — 占zhàn zhàn 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 密切接触mì qiè jiē chù mì qiè jiē chù 者zhě zhě 检测jiǎn cè jiǎn cè 的de de 0.1%0.1% 0.1% [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The Senate committee's final report, released in April 2022, found that between May and November 2020, the COVIDSafe app identified only 17 additional close contacts out of 25,300 total close contacts in New South Wales—representing 0.1% of all close contact detections [1].
新南威尔士xīn nán wēi ěr shì xīn nán wēi ěr shì 大学dà xué dà xué 研究yán jiū yán jiū 人员rén yuán rén yuán 随后suí hòu suí hòu 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 的de de 独立dú lì dú lì 研究yán jiū yán jiū 涵盖hán gài hán gài 了le le 同一tóng yī tóng yī 时期shí qī shí qī ,, , 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn 了le le 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 糟糕zāo gāo zāo gāo 表现biǎo xiàn biǎo xiàn ,, , 该gāi gāi 应用程序yìng yòng chéng xù yìng yòng chéng xù 仅jǐn jǐn 检测jiǎn cè jiǎn cè 到dào dào 15%15% 15% 通过tōng guò tōng guò 传统chuán tǒng chuán tǒng 接触jiē chù jiē chù 者zhě zhě 追踪zhuī zōng zhuī zōng 识别shí bié shí bié 的de de 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 密切接触mì qiè jiē chù mì qiè jiē chù 者zhě zhě ,, , 而ér ér 该gāi gāi 应用程序yìng yòng chéng xù yìng yòng chéng xù 标记biāo jì biāo jì 的de de 接触jiē chù jiē chù 者zhě zhě 中zhōng zhōng 有yǒu yǒu 61%61% 61% 在zài zài 流行病学liú xíng bìng xué liú xíng bìng xué 上shàng shàng 与yǔ yǔ 病例bìng lì bìng lì 无关wú guān wú guān [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
A subsequent independent study by UNSW researchers covering the same period found similarly poor performance, with the app detecting only 15% of true close contacts identified through conventional contact tracing, while 61% of contacts the app flagged were not epidemiologically linked to cases [2].
关于guān yú guān yú 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 推卸责任tuī xiè zé rèn tuī xiè zé rèn 的de de 声明shēng míng shēng míng 得到dé dào dé dào 了le le 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 调查结果diào chá jié guǒ diào chá jié guǒ 的de de 支持zhī chí zhī chí :: : "" " 联邦政府lián bāng zhèng fǔ lián bāng zhèng fǔ 不bù bù 愿意yuàn yì yuàn yì 提供tí gōng tí gōng 关于guān yú guān yú COVIDSafeCOVIDSafe COVIDSafe 应用程序yìng yòng chéng xù yìng yòng chéng xù 识别shí bié shí bié 了le le 多少duō shǎo duō shǎo 额外é wài é wài 接触jiē chù jiē chù 者zhě zhě 的de de 更新gēng xīn gēng xīn ,, , 而是ér shì ér shì 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 各州gè zhōu gè zhōu 和hé hé 地区dì qū dì qū 有yǒu yǒu 责任zé rèn zé rèn 报告bào gào bào gào 识别shí bié shí bié 出chū chū 的de de 病例bìng lì bìng lì 数量shù liàng shù liàng "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The claim about the government's responsibility-shifting statement is supported by the Senate committee's finding: "the federal government has been unwilling to provide an update on how many additional contacts the COVIDSafe app has identified, choosing to instead claim the states and territories are responsible for reporting the number of cases identified" [1].
这zhè zhè 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí 了le le 拒绝jù jué jù jué 公布gōng bù gōng bù 数据shù jù shù jù 并bìng bìng 将jiāng jiāng 责任zé rèn zé rèn 归咎于guī jiù yú guī jiù yú 州政府zhōu zhèng fǔ zhōu zhèng fǔ 的de de 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng 。。 。
This directly confirms the accusation of refusing to publish the numbers and attributing responsibility to state governments.

缺失背景

然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 该gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng 忽略hū lüè hū lüè 了le le 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 的de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 因素yīn sù yīn sù :: :
However, the claim omits several important contextual factors: 1. **The app's minimal operational use**: The COVIDSafe app was only used by New South Wales and Victoria, and had extremely limited uptake among Australians.
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 应用程序yìng yòng chéng xù yìng yòng chéng xù 的de de 最小化zuì xiǎo huà zuì xiǎo huà 运营yùn yíng yùn yíng 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng ** * ** * :: : COVIDSafeCOVIDSafe COVIDSafe 应用程序yìng yòng chéng xù yìng yòng chéng xù 仅jǐn jǐn 在zài zài 新南威尔士州xīn nán wēi ěr shì zhōu xīn nán wēi ěr shì zhōu 和hé hé 维多利亚州wéi duō lì yà zhōu wéi duō lì yà zhōu 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng ,, , 澳大利亚人ào dà lì yà rén ào dà lì yà rén 对duì duì 其qí qí 接受程度jiē shòu chéng dù jiē shòu chéng dù 极低jí dī jí dī 。。 。
Only 22% of COVID-19 cases were using the app during the study period [2].
在zài zài 研究yán jiū yán jiū 期间qī jiān qī jiān ,, , 只有zhǐ yǒu zhǐ yǒu 22%22% 22% 的de de COVIDCOVID COVID -- - 1919 19 病例bìng lì bìng lì 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 该gāi gāi 应用程序yìng yòng chéng xù yìng yòng chéng xù [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
This limited use partially explains why it identified so few contacts. 2. **Genuine state-federal responsibility complexity**: While the claim frames the federal government's statement as evasion, there is legitimate complexity in contact tracing responsibility.
这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 有限yǒu xiàn yǒu xiàn 的de de 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 部分bù fèn bù fèn 解释jiě shì jiě shì 了le le 为什么wèi shén me wèi shén me 它tā tā 识别shí bié shí bié 的de de 接触jiē chù jiē chù 者zhě zhě 如此rú cǐ rú cǐ 之少zhī shǎo zhī shǎo 。。 。
States operate their own contact tracing systems and conduct case interviews.
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 的de de 州zhōu zhōu -- - 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 责任zé rèn zé rèn 复杂性fù zá xìng fù zá xìng ** * ** * :: : 虽然suī rán suī rán 该gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng 将jiāng jiāng 联邦政府lián bāng zhèng fǔ lián bāng zhèng fǔ 的de de 声明shēng míng shēng míng 定性dìng xìng dìng xìng 为wèi wèi 逃避责任táo bì zé rèn táo bì zé rèn ,, , 但dàn dàn 接触jiē chù jiē chù 者zhě zhě 追踪zhuī zōng zhuī zōng 责任zé rèn zé rèn 确实què shí què shí 存在cún zài cún zài 合法hé fǎ hé fǎ 的de de 复杂性fù zá xìng fù zá xìng 。。 。
The federal government's point—that states are responsible for reporting what their systems find—has some technical merit, though the government could have more transparently tracked data it did collect. 3. **The app was voluntary**: The COVIDSafe app relied on voluntary user participation and Bluetooth proximity detection, which proved technically unreliable.
各州gè zhōu gè zhōu 运营yùn yíng yùn yíng 自己zì jǐ zì jǐ 的de de 接触jiē chù jiē chù 者zhě zhě 追踪zhuī zōng zhuī zōng 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng 并bìng bìng 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 病例bìng lì bìng lì 访谈fǎng tán fǎng tán 。。 。
Low uptake was partly because Australians chose not to use it after early skepticism. 4. **Cost and timeline**: The app cost $9.2 million by October 2021 [1], but the poor performance became apparent relatively quickly.
联邦政府lián bāng zhèng fǔ lián bāng zhèng fǔ 的de de 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn —— — —— — 即jí jí 各州gè zhōu gè zhōu 有yǒu yǒu 责任zé rèn zé rèn 报告bào gào bào gào 其qí qí 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn 的de de 内容nèi róng nèi róng —— — —— — 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 一定yí dìng yí dìng 的de de 技术jì shù jì shù 合理性hé lǐ xìng hé lǐ xìng ,, , 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 本běn běn 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ 更gèng gèng 透明tòu míng tòu míng 地dì dì 跟踪gēn zōng gēn zōng 和hé hé 公布gōng bù gōng bù 其qí qí 收集shōu jí shōu jí 的de de 数据shù jù shù jù 。。 。
The government continued funding it despite evidence of failure, which was the more substantive issue than the transparency question.
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 该gāi gāi 应用程序yìng yòng chéng xù yìng yòng chéng xù 是shì shì 自愿zì yuàn zì yuàn 的de de ** * ** * :: : COVIDSafeCOVIDSafe COVIDSafe 应用程序yìng yòng chéng xù yìng yòng chéng xù 依赖yī lài yī lài 自愿zì yuàn zì yuàn 用户yòng hù yòng hù 参与cān yù cān yù 和hé hé 蓝牙lán yá lán yá 近距离jìn jù lí jìn jù lí 检测jiǎn cè jiǎn cè ,, , 这zhè zhè 在技术上zài jì shù shàng zài jì shù shàng 被bèi bèi 证明zhèng míng zhèng míng 是shì shì 不bù bù 可靠kě kào kě kào 的de de 。。 。
接受jiē shòu jiē shòu 率低lǜ dī lǜ dī 部分bù fèn bù fèn 是因为shì yīn wèi shì yīn wèi 澳大利亚人ào dà lì yà rén ào dà lì yà rén 在zài zài 早期zǎo qī zǎo qī 怀疑huái yí huái yí 后hòu hòu 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 不bù bù 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 它tā tā 。。 。
44 4 .. . ** * ** * 成本chéng běn chéng běn 和hé hé 时间shí jiān shí jiān 线xiàn xiàn ** * ** * :: : 该gāi gāi 应用程序yìng yòng chéng xù yìng yòng chéng xù 到dào dào 20212021 2021 年nián nián 1010 10 月yuè yuè 已yǐ yǐ 耗资hào zī hào zī 920920 920 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] ,, , 但dàn dàn 糟糕zāo gāo zāo gāo 的de de 表现biǎo xiàn biǎo xiàn 相对xiāng duì xiāng duì 较jiào jiào 快kuài kuài 就jiù jiù 变得biàn dé biàn dé 明显míng xiǎn míng xiǎn 。。 。
尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 有yǒu yǒu 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 失败shī bài shī bài ,, , 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 仍réng réng 继续jì xù jì xù 为wèi wèi 其qí qí 提供tí gōng tí gōng 资金zī jīn zī jīn ,, , 这比zhè bǐ zhè bǐ 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 问题wèn tí wèn tí 更为gèng wéi gèng wéi 实质性shí zhì xìng shí zhì xìng 。。 。

来源可信度评估

ZDNetZDNet ZDNet 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng (( ( 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán )) ) 是shì shì 由yóu yóu ZiffZiff Ziff DavisDavis Davis 拥有yōng yǒu yōng yǒu 的de de 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 科技kē jì kē jì 出版物chū bǎn wù chū bǎn wù 。。 。
The ZDNet article (original source) is a mainstream Australian technology publication owned by Ziff Davis.
作者zuò zhě zuò zhě CampbellCampbell Campbell KwanKwan Kwan 是shì shì 一名yī míng yī míng 科技kē jì kē jì 记者jì zhě jì zhě 。。 。
Campbell Kwan, the author, is a technology reporter.
该gāi gāi 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 是shì shì 由yóu yóu 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 特别tè bié tè bié 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 官方guān fāng guān fāng 调查结果diào chá jié guǒ diào chá jié guǒ 和hé hé 新南威尔士xīn nán wēi ěr shì xīn nán wēi ěr shì 大学dà xué dà xué 独立dú lì dú lì 研究yán jiū yán jiū 支持zhī chí zhī chí 的de de 事实shì shí shì shí 报道bào dào bào dào —— — —— — 两者liǎng zhě liǎng zhě 都dōu dōu 是shì shì 高度gāo dù gāo dù 可信kě xìn kě xìn 的de de 来源lái yuán lái yuán 。。 。
The article is factual reporting backed by the Senate Select Committee's official findings and independent UNSW research—both highly credible sources.
该gāi gāi 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 适当shì dàng shì dàng 地dì dì 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 了le le 官方guān fāng guān fāng 来源lái yuán lái yuán 并bìng bìng 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 了le le 同行tóng háng tóng háng 评议píng yì píng yì 研究yán jiū yán jiū 的de de 数据shù jù shù jù [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The article appropriately quotes official sources and cites data from peer-reviewed research [2].
参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn COVIDCOVID COVID -- - 1919 19 特别tè bié tè bié 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 本身běn shēn běn shēn 由yóu yóu LaborLabor Labor 占zhàn zhàn 主导zhǔ dǎo zhǔ dǎo (( ( LaborLabor Labor 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán 构成gòu chéng gòu chéng 多数duō shù duō shù )) ) ,, , ABCABC ABC 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 在zài zài 其qí qí 报告bào gào bào gào 分析fēn xī fēn xī 中zhōng zhōng 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū 了le le 这zhè zhè 一点yì diǎn yì diǎn [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
The Senate Select Committee on COVID-19 itself had Labor dominance (Labor senators formed the majority), which the ABC article notes in its analysis of the report [3].
自由党zì yóu dǎng zì yóu dǎng 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán JamesJames James PatersonPaterson Paterson 和hé hé 国家guó jiā guó jiā 党dǎng dǎng 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán PerinPerin Perin DaveyDavey Davey 发表fā biǎo fā biǎo 了le le 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 声明shēng míng shēng míng ,, , 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì "" " 被bèi bèi 用作yòng zuò yòng zuò LaborLabor Labor 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán 对duì duì 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 攻击gōng jī gōng jī 的de de 工具gōng jù gōng jù "" " [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
Liberal Senator James Paterson and Nationals Senator Perin Davey issued a dissenting statement claiming the committee had been "used as a vehicle in which Labor senators have pursued partisan attacks on the government" [3].
这是zhè shì zhè shì 相关xiāng guān xiāng guān 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng —— — —— — 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 报告bào gào bào gào 虽然suī rán suī rán 在zài zài 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng 有yǒu yǒu 根据gēn jù gēn jù ,, , 但是dàn shì dàn shì 由yóu yóu 一个yí gè yí gè LaborLabor Labor 占zhàn zhàn 主导zhǔ dǎo zhǔ dǎo 的de de 机构jī gòu jī gòu 制作zhì zuò zhì zuò 的de de ,, , 并bìng bìng 包含bāo hán bāo hán 了le le 与yǔ yǔ LaborLabor Labor 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 一致yí zhì yí zhì 的de de 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 。。 。
This is relevant context—the committee report, while factually grounded, was produced by a Labor-dominated body and included recommendations aligned with Labor policy positions.
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做过zuò guò zuò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng ?? ?
**Did Labor do something similar?** Under the Rudd/Gillard governments (2007-2013), there was no equivalent national contact tracing app, as mobile technology and pandemic preparedness frameworks were different at that time.
** * ** *
Australia's response to pandemic preparedness was largely inherited by the Coalition government in 2013.
在zài zài 陆克文lù kè wén lù kè wén // / 吉拉德jí lā dé jí lā dé 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 时期shí qī shí qī (( ( 20072007 2007 -- - 20132013 2013 年nián nián )) ) ,, , 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu equivalentequivalent equivalent 的de de 国家guó jiā guó jiā 接触jiē chù jiē chù 者zhě zhě 追踪zhuī zōng zhuī zōng 应用程序yìng yòng chéng xù yìng yòng chéng xù ,, , 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi 当时dāng shí dāng shí 的de de 移动yí dòng yí dòng 技术jì shù jì shù 和hé hé 疫情yì qíng yì qíng 防备fáng bèi fáng bèi 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 不同bù tóng bù tóng 。。 。
However, the broader issue of government transparency around data collection is relevant.
澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 对大duì dà duì dà 流行病liú xíng bìng liú xíng bìng 防备fáng bèi fáng bèi 的de de 应对yìng duì yìng duì 措施cuò shī cuò shī 在zài zài 很大hěn dà hěn dà 程度chéng dù chéng dù 上shàng shàng 是shì shì 由yóu yóu CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 于yú yú 20132013 2013 年nián nián 继承jì chéng jì chéng 的de de 。。 。
Labor has historically advocated for **greater transparency** in government pandemic responses, which is why Labor senators pushed the COVID-19 committee to examine this issue.
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 围绕wéi rào wéi rào 数据shù jù shù jù 收集shōu jí shōu jí 的de de 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 这一zhè yī zhè yī 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí 是shì shì 相关xiāng guān xiāng guān 的de de 。。 。
This suggests Labor would likely have been more transparent about data collection failure, though we don't have direct precedent since Labor wasn't in government during the pandemic.
LaborLabor Labor 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ 上shàng shàng 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 在zài zài 大dà dà 流行病liú xíng bìng liú xíng bìng 应对yìng duì yìng duì 中zhōng zhōng ** * ** * 提高tí gāo tí gāo 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù ** * ** * ,, , 这zhè zhè 就是jiù shì jiù shì 为什么wèi shén me wèi shén me LaborLabor Labor 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán 推动tuī dòng tuī dòng COVIDCOVID COVID -- - 1919 19 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 审查shěn chá shěn chá 这一zhè yī zhè yī 问题wèn tí wèn tí 。。 。
The issue of government intransparency around failed programs is not unique to the Coalition—it's a general government tendency.
这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng LaborLabor Labor 可能kě néng kě néng 会huì huì 对duì duì 数据shù jù shù jù 收集shōu jí shōu jí 失败shī bài shī bài 更加gèng jiā gèng jiā 透明tòu míng tòu míng ,, , 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 我们wǒ men wǒ men 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 先例xiān lì xiān lì ,, , 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi LaborLabor Labor 在zài zài 大dà dà 流行liú xíng liú xíng 期间qī jiān qī jiān 不bù bù 在zài zài 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 。。 。
However, the specific refusal to publish COVIDSafe metrics appears to have been distinctive to this app and the Coalition government's handling of it.
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 对duì duì 失败shī bài shī bài 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 不bù bù 透明tòu míng tòu míng 的de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu —— — —— — 这是zhè shì zhè shì 一般yì bān yì bān 的de de 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng 。。 。
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 拒绝jù jué jù jué 公布gōng bù gōng bù COVIDSafeCOVIDSafe COVIDSafe 指标zhǐ biāo zhǐ biāo 的de de 具体做法jù tǐ zuò fǎ jù tǐ zuò fǎ 似乎sì hū sì hū 是shì shì 该gāi gāi 应用程序yìng yòng chéng xù yìng yòng chéng xù 和hé hé CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 处理chǔ lǐ chǔ lǐ 方式fāng shì fāng shì 的de de 独特dú tè dú tè 之zhī zhī 处chù chù 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

虽然suī rán suī rán 批评者pī píng zhě pī píng zhě 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 故意gù yì gù yì 掩盖yǎn gài yǎn gài COVIDSafeCOVIDSafe COVIDSafe 的de de 失败shī bài shī bài 以yǐ yǐ 避免bì miǎn bì miǎn 问责wèn zé wèn zé ,, , 但dàn dàn 有yǒu yǒu 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 合法hé fǎ hé fǎ 的de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 点diǎn diǎn :: :
While critics argue the government deliberately obscured COVIDSafe's failure to avoid accountability, there are several legitimate contextual points: 1. **The complexity of cross-government data**: Contact tracing data lives with state health authorities, not the federal government.
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 跨kuà kuà 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 数据shù jù shù jù 的de de 复杂性fù zá xìng fù zá xìng ** * ** * :: : 接触jiē chù jiē chù 者zhě zhě 追踪zhuī zōng zhuī zōng 数据shù jù shù jù 由yóu yóu 各州gè zhōu gè zhōu 卫生wèi shēng wèi shēng 当局dāng jú dāng jú 掌握zhǎng wò zhǎng wò ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 联邦政府lián bāng zhèng fǔ lián bāng zhèng fǔ 。。 。
The government technically wasn't hiding data it never collected—the data was generated by states conducting interviews.
从技术上cóng jì shù shàng cóng jì shù shàng 讲jiǎng jiǎng ,, , 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 并bìng bìng 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 隐藏yǐn cáng yǐn cáng 从未cóng wèi cóng wèi 收集shōu jí shōu jí 过guò guò 的de de 数据shù jù shù jù —— — —— — 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 数据shù jù shù jù 是shì shì 由yóu yóu 各州gè zhōu gè zhōu 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 访谈fǎng tán fǎng tán 生成shēng chéng shēng chéng 的de de 。。 。
However, the government **could have** more proactively tracked and published the limited data it did have about the app's actual performance. 2. **The real problem was continued funding, not transparency**: The more substantive criticism isn't whether the government published data—it's that the government continued funding an app it knew was ineffective.
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ ** * ** * 本běn běn 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ ** * ** * 更gèng gèng 主动zhǔ dòng zhǔ dòng 地dì dì 跟踪gēn zōng gēn zōng 和hé hé 公布gōng bù gōng bù 其qí qí 掌握zhǎng wò zhǎng wò 的de de 关于guān yú guān yú 应用程序yìng yòng chéng xù yìng yòng chéng xù 实际shí jì shí jì 表现biǎo xiàn biǎo xiàn 的de de 有限yǒu xiàn yǒu xiàn 数据shù jù shù jù 。。 。
The Senate committee's key recommendation was to "cease any future expenditure of public funds on the failed COVIDSafe application" [1], not just to publish historical data. 3. **Responsibility-shifting was technically defensible but poorly communicated**: The government's statement that states are responsible for reporting contacts detected through their systems has some validity.
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 的de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí 是shì shì 继续jì xù jì xù 提供tí gōng tí gōng 资金zī jīn zī jīn ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù ** * ** * :: : 更gèng gèng 实质性shí zhì xìng shí zhì xìng 的de de 批评pī píng pī píng 不bù bù 在于zài yú zài yú 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 公布gōng bù gōng bù 了le le 数据shù jù shù jù —— — —— — 而ér ér 在于zài yú zài yú 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 继续jì xù jì xù 为wèi wèi 一个yí gè yí gè 已知yǐ zhī yǐ zhī 无效wú xiào wú xiào 的de de 应用程序yìng yòng chéng xù yìng yòng chéng xù 提供tí gōng tí gōng 资金zī jīn zī jīn 。。 。
Contact tracing is a state responsibility in the Australian federal system.
参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 的de de 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 是shì shì "" " 停止tíng zhǐ tíng zhǐ 对duì duì 失败shī bài shī bài 的de de COVIDSafeCOVIDSafe COVIDSafe 应用程序yìng yòng chéng xù yìng yòng chéng xù 的de de 任何rèn hé rèn hé 未来wèi lái wèi lái 公共gōng gòng gōng gòng 资金zī jīn zī jīn 支出zhī chū zhī chū "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] ,, , 而ér ér 不仅仅bù jǐn jǐn bù jǐn jǐn 是shì shì 公布gōng bù gōng bù 历史数据lì shǐ shù jù lì shǐ shù jù 。。 。
However, the government could have been more proactive in aggregating and publishing what little data existed about the app's performance. 4. **Independent research filled the gap**: UNSW researchers independently studied the app's effectiveness and published peer-reviewed findings showing 0.1% contact detection rate [2].
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 推卸责任tuī xiè zé rèn tuī xiè zé rèn 在技术上zài jì shù shàng zài jì shù shàng 是shì shì 可辩护kě biàn hù kě biàn hù 的de de ,, , 但dàn dàn 沟通gōu tōng gōu tōng 不力bù lì bù lì ** * ** * :: : 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 关于guān yú guān yú 各州gè zhōu gè zhōu 有yǒu yǒu 责任zé rèn zé rèn 报告bào gào bào gào 通过tōng guò tōng guò 其qí qí 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng 检测jiǎn cè jiǎn cè 到dào dào 的de de 接触jiē chù jiē chù 者zhě zhě 的de de 声明shēng míng shēng míng 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 一定yí dìng yí dìng 的de de 有效性yǒu xiào xìng yǒu xiào xìng 。。 。
Academic research and the Senate committee ultimately provided the transparency the government didn't. **Key context:** This is **not unique to the Coalition**—most governments are reluctant to publicize failed programs.
在zài zài 澳大利亚联邦ào dà lì yà lián bāng ào dà lì yà lián bāng 制度zhì dù zhì dù 中zhōng zhōng ,, , 接触jiē chù jiē chù 者zhě zhě 追踪zhuī zōng zhuī zōng 是shì shì 州zhōu zhōu 的de de 责任zé rèn zé rèn 。。 。
However, the specific dynamic where a federal government funds an app but then claims responsibility for publishing effectiveness data belongs to the state is somewhat distinctive.
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 本běn běn 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ 更gèng gèng 主动zhǔ dòng zhǔ dòng 地dì dì 汇总huì zǒng huì zǒng 和hé hé 公布gōng bù gōng bù 关于guān yú guān yú 应用程序yìng yòng chéng xù yìng yòng chéng xù 表现biǎo xiàn biǎo xiàn 的de de 少量shǎo liàng shǎo liàng 数据shù jù shù jù 。。 。
The more notable issue is that the government funded a clearly ineffective app for years despite mounting evidence of failure.
44 4 .. . ** * ** * 独立dú lì dú lì 研究yán jiū yán jiū 填补tián bǔ tián bǔ 了le le 这zhè zhè 一yī yī 空白kòng bái kòng bái ** * ** * :: : 新南威尔士xīn nán wēi ěr shì xīn nán wēi ěr shì 大学dà xué dà xué 研究yán jiū yán jiū 人员rén yuán rén yuán 独立dú lì dú lì 研究yán jiū yán jiū 了le le 该gāi gāi 应用程序yìng yòng chéng xù yìng yòng chéng xù 的de de 有效性yǒu xiào xìng yǒu xiào xìng ,, , 并bìng bìng 发表fā biǎo fā biǎo 了le le 同行tóng háng tóng háng 评议píng yì píng yì 的de de 研究yán jiū yán jiū 结果jié guǒ jié guǒ ,, , 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì 接触jiē chù jiē chù 者zhě zhě 检测jiǎn cè jiǎn cè 率为lǜ wèi lǜ wèi 0.1%0.1% 0.1% [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
学术研究xué shù yán jiū xué shù yán jiū 和hé hé 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 提供tí gōng tí gōng 了le le 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 提供tí gōng tí gōng 的de de 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 。。 。
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng :: : ** * ** * 这zhè zhè ** * ** * 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu ** * ** * —— — —— — 大多数dà duō shù dà duō shù 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 都dōu dōu 不bù bù 愿意yuàn yì yuàn yì 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 失败shī bài shī bài 的de de 计划jì huà jì huà 。。 。
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 联邦政府lián bāng zhèng fǔ lián bāng zhèng fǔ 资助zī zhù zī zhù 一个yí gè yí gè 应用程序yìng yòng chéng xù yìng yòng chéng xù ,, , 然后rán hòu rán hòu 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 公布gōng bù gōng bù 有效性yǒu xiào xìng yǒu xiào xìng 数据shù jù shù jù 的de de 责任zé rèn zé rèn 属于shǔ yú shǔ yú 州政府zhōu zhèng fǔ zhōu zhèng fǔ 的de de 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 动态dòng tài dòng tài 在zài zài 某种程度mǒu zhǒng chéng dù mǒu zhǒng chéng dù 上shàng shàng 是shì shì 独特dú tè dú tè 的de de 。。 。
更gèng gèng 值得注意zhí de zhù yì zhí de zhù yì 的de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí 是shì shì ,, , 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 有yǒu yǒu 越来越yuè lái yuè yuè lái yuè 多duō duō 的de de 失败shī bài shī bài 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù ,, , 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 仍为réng wèi réng wèi 一个yí gè yí gè 明显míng xiǎn míng xiǎn 无效wú xiào wú xiào 的de de 应用程序yìng yòng chéng xù yìng yòng chéng xù 提供tí gōng tí gōng 了le le 多年duō nián duō nián 的de de 资金zī jīn zī jīn 。。 。

属实

7.0

/ 10

联邦政府lián bāng zhèng fǔ lián bāng zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 拒绝jù jué jù jué 公布gōng bù gōng bù COVIDSafeCOVIDSafe COVIDSafe 接触jiē chù jiē chù 者zhě zhě 识别shí bié shí bié 数据shù jù shù jù ,, , 并bìng bìng 确实què shí què shí 将jiāng jiāng 责任zé rèn zé rèn 归咎于guī jiù yú guī jiù yú 州政府zhōu zhèng fǔ zhōu zhèng fǔ 。。 。
The federal government did refuse to publish COVIDSafe contact identification numbers and did attribute responsibility to state governments.
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 该gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng 简化jiǎn huà jiǎn huà 了le le 更gèng gèng 复杂fù zá fù zá 的de de 联邦lián bāng lián bāng -- - 州zhōu zhōu 问题wèn tí wèn tí ,, , 并bìng bìng 忽略hū lüè hū lüè 了le le 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 的de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí 是shì shì 在zài zài 已yǐ yǐ 证明zhèng míng zhèng míng 无效wú xiào wú xiào 的de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 下xià xià 继续jì xù jì xù 提供tí gōng tí gōng 资金zī jīn zī jīn ,, , 而ér ér 不仅仅bù jǐn jǐn bù jǐn jǐn 是shì shì 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 问题wèn tí wèn tí 。。 。
However, the claim simplifies a more complex federal-state issue and omits that the real problem was continued funding despite proven ineffectiveness, not just transparency.

📚 来源与引用 (5)

  1. 1
    Senate committee calls for funding of failed COVIDSafe app to be dropped

    Senate committee calls for funding of failed COVIDSafe app to be dropped

    From May to November 2020, the COVIDSafe app chipped in 0.1% of all close contact detections in New South Wales.

    ZDNET
  2. 2
    unsw.edu.au

    The COVIDSafe app was designed to help contact tracers. We crunched the numbers to see what really happened

    Unsw Edu

  3. 3
    Key takeaways from Senate COVID-19 committee final report

    Key takeaways from Senate COVID-19 committee final report

    From lockdowns, to the international border closure and the vaccine rollout, a Senate committee has been scrutinising the government's response to COVID-19 since the start of the pandemic. Here are some of the main points from its final report.

    Abc Net
  4. 4
    The COVIDSafe app was designed to help contact tracers. We crunched the numbers to see what really happened

    The COVIDSafe app was designed to help contact tracers. We crunched the numbers to see what really happened

    Instead of making the lives of contact tracers easier, analysis shows the expensive technology missed contacts and added to their workload.

    The Conversation
  5. 5
    PDF

    Report on the operation and effectiveness of COVIDSafe and the National COVIDSafe Data Store

    Health Gov • PDF Document

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。