属实

评分: 7.0/10

Coalition
C0025

声明内容

“拒绝公布COVIDSafe应用程序识别了多少COVID密切接触者的数据。他们表示,报告联邦政府应用程序识别出多少接触者是州政府的职责。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis

原始来源

事实核查

联邦政府lián bāng zhèng fǔ lián bāng zhèng fǔ 拒绝jù jué jù jué 公布gōng bù gōng bù COVIDSafeCOVIDSafe COVIDSafe 接触jiē chù jiē chù zhě zhě 追踪zhuī zōng zhuī zōng 数据shù jù shù jù de de 核心hé xīn hé xīn 声明shēng míng shēng míng ** * ** * 基本jī běn jī běn 得到dé dào dé dào 验证yàn zhèng yàn zhèng ** * ** *
The core claim that the federal government refused to publish COVIDSafe contact tracing data is **substantially verified**.
根据gēn jù gēn jù ZDNetZDNet ZDNet 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 援引yuán yǐn yuán yǐn de de 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn COVIDCOVID COVID -- - 1919 19 特别tè bié tè bié 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì de de 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ "" " 联邦政府lián bāng zhèng fǔ lián bāng zhèng fǔ 愿意yuàn yì yuàn yì 提供tí gōng tí gōng 关于guān yú guān yú COVIDSafeCOVIDSafe COVIDSafe 应用程序yìng yòng chéng xù yìng yòng chéng xù 识别shí bié shí bié le le 多少duō shǎo duō shǎo 额外é wài é wài 接触jiē chù jiē chù zhě zhě de de 更新gēng xīn gēng xīn 而是ér shì ér shì 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 各州gè zhōu gè zhōu 地区dì qū dì qū yǒu yǒu 责任zé rèn zé rèn 报告bào gào bào gào 识别shí bié shí bié chū chū de de 病例bìng lì bìng lì 数量shù liàng shù liàng "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
According to the ZDNet article citing the Senate Select Committee on COVID-19, "the federal government has been unwilling to provide an update on how many additional contacts the COVIDSafe app has identified, choosing to instead claim the states and territories are responsible for reporting the number of cases identified" [1].
参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 20222022 2022 nián nián 44 4 yuè yuè 发布fā bù fā bù de de 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 报告bào gào bào gào 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn zài zài 20202020 2020 nián nián 55 5 yuè yuè zhì zhì 1111 11 yuè yuè 期间qī jiān qī jiān COVIDSafeCOVIDSafe COVIDSafe 应用程序yìng yòng chéng xù yìng yòng chéng xù zài zài 新南威尔士州xīn nán wēi ěr shì zhōu xīn nán wēi ěr shì zhōu 2525 25 ,, , 300300 300 míng míng 密切接触mì qiè jiē chù mì qiè jiē chù zhě zhě 中仅zhōng jǐn zhōng jǐn 识别shí bié shí bié chū chū 1717 17 名额míng é míng é wài wài de de 密切接触mì qiè jiē chù mì qiè jiē chù zhě zhě zhàn zhàn 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 密切接触mì qiè jiē chù mì qiè jiē chù zhě zhě 检测jiǎn cè jiǎn cè de de 0.1%0.1% 0.1% [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The Senate committee's final report, released in April 2022, found that between May and November 2020, the COVIDSafe app identified only 17 additional close contacts out of 25,300 total close contacts in New South Wales—representing 0.1% of all close contact detections [1].
新南威尔士xīn nán wēi ěr shì xīn nán wēi ěr shì 大学dà xué dà xué 研究yán jiū yán jiū 人员rén yuán rén yuán 随后suí hòu suí hòu 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng de de 独立dú lì dú lì 研究yán jiū yán jiū 涵盖hán gài hán gài le le 同一tóng yī tóng yī 时期shí qī shí qī 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn le le 类似lèi sì lèi sì de de 糟糕zāo gāo zāo gāo 表现biǎo xiàn biǎo xiàn gāi gāi 应用程序yìng yòng chéng xù yìng yòng chéng xù jǐn jǐn 检测jiǎn cè jiǎn cè dào dào 15%15% 15% 通过tōng guò tōng guò 传统chuán tǒng chuán tǒng 接触jiē chù jiē chù zhě zhě 追踪zhuī zōng zhuī zōng 识别shí bié shí bié de de 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 密切接触mì qiè jiē chù mì qiè jiē chù zhě zhě ér ér gāi gāi 应用程序yìng yòng chéng xù yìng yòng chéng xù 标记biāo jì biāo jì de de 接触jiē chù jiē chù zhě zhě zhōng zhōng yǒu yǒu 61%61% 61% zài zài 流行病学liú xíng bìng xué liú xíng bìng xué shàng shàng 病例bìng lì bìng lì 无关wú guān wú guān [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
A subsequent independent study by UNSW researchers covering the same period found similarly poor performance, with the app detecting only 15% of true close contacts identified through conventional contact tracing, while 61% of contacts the app flagged were not epidemiologically linked to cases [2].
关于guān yú guān yú 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 推卸责任tuī xiè zé rèn tuī xiè zé rèn de de 声明shēng míng shēng míng 得到dé dào dé dào le le 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 调查结果diào chá jié guǒ diào chá jié guǒ de de 支持zhī chí zhī chí "" " 联邦政府lián bāng zhèng fǔ lián bāng zhèng fǔ 愿意yuàn yì yuàn yì 提供tí gōng tí gōng 关于guān yú guān yú COVIDSafeCOVIDSafe COVIDSafe 应用程序yìng yòng chéng xù yìng yòng chéng xù 识别shí bié shí bié le le 多少duō shǎo duō shǎo 额外é wài é wài 接触jiē chù jiē chù zhě zhě de de 更新gēng xīn gēng xīn 而是ér shì ér shì 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 各州gè zhōu gè zhōu 地区dì qū dì qū yǒu yǒu 责任zé rèn zé rèn 报告bào gào bào gào 识别shí bié shí bié chū chū de de 病例bìng lì bìng lì 数量shù liàng shù liàng "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The claim about the government's responsibility-shifting statement is supported by the Senate committee's finding: "the federal government has been unwilling to provide an update on how many additional contacts the COVIDSafe app has identified, choosing to instead claim the states and territories are responsible for reporting the number of cases identified" [1].
zhè zhè 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí le le 拒绝jù jué jù jué 公布gōng bù gōng bù 数据shù jù shù jù bìng bìng jiāng jiāng 责任zé rèn zé rèn 归咎于guī jiù yú guī jiù yú 州政府zhōu zhèng fǔ zhōu zhèng fǔ de de 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng
This directly confirms the accusation of refusing to publish the numbers and attributing responsibility to state governments.

缺失背景

然而rán ér rán ér gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng 忽略hū lüè hū lüè le le 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 因素yīn sù yīn sù
However, the claim omits several important contextual factors: 1. **The app's minimal operational use**: The COVIDSafe app was only used by New South Wales and Victoria, and had extremely limited uptake among Australians.
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 应用程序yìng yòng chéng xù yìng yòng chéng xù de de 最小化zuì xiǎo huà zuì xiǎo huà 运营yùn yíng yùn yíng 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng ** * ** * COVIDSafeCOVIDSafe COVIDSafe 应用程序yìng yòng chéng xù yìng yòng chéng xù jǐn jǐn zài zài 新南威尔士州xīn nán wēi ěr shì zhōu xīn nán wēi ěr shì zhōu 维多利亚州wéi duō lì yà zhōu wéi duō lì yà zhōu 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 澳大利亚人ào dà lì yà rén ào dà lì yà rén duì duì 接受程度jiē shòu chéng dù jiē shòu chéng dù 极低jí dī jí dī
Only 22% of COVID-19 cases were using the app during the study period [2].
zài zài 研究yán jiū yán jiū 期间qī jiān qī jiān 只有zhǐ yǒu zhǐ yǒu 22%22% 22% de de COVIDCOVID COVID -- - 1919 19 病例bìng lì bìng lì 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng gāi gāi 应用程序yìng yòng chéng xù yìng yòng chéng xù [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
This limited use partially explains why it identified so few contacts. 2. **Genuine state-federal responsibility complexity**: While the claim frames the federal government's statement as evasion, there is legitimate complexity in contact tracing responsibility.
这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 有限yǒu xiàn yǒu xiàn de de 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 部分bù fèn bù fèn 解释jiě shì jiě shì le le 为什么wèi shén me wèi shén me 识别shí bié shí bié de de 接触jiē chù jiē chù zhě zhě 如此rú cǐ rú cǐ 之少zhī shǎo zhī shǎo
States operate their own contact tracing systems and conduct case interviews.
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng de de zhōu zhōu -- - 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 责任zé rèn zé rèn 复杂性fù zá xìng fù zá xìng ** * ** * 虽然suī rán suī rán gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng jiāng jiāng 联邦政府lián bāng zhèng fǔ lián bāng zhèng fǔ de de 声明shēng míng shēng míng 定性dìng xìng dìng xìng wèi wèi 逃避责任táo bì zé rèn táo bì zé rèn dàn dàn 接触jiē chù jiē chù zhě zhě 追踪zhuī zōng zhuī zōng 责任zé rèn zé rèn 确实què shí què shí 存在cún zài cún zài 合法hé fǎ hé fǎ de de 复杂性fù zá xìng fù zá xìng
The federal government's point—that states are responsible for reporting what their systems find—has some technical merit, though the government could have more transparently tracked data it did collect. 3. **The app was voluntary**: The COVIDSafe app relied on voluntary user participation and Bluetooth proximity detection, which proved technically unreliable.
各州gè zhōu gè zhōu 运营yùn yíng yùn yíng 自己zì jǐ zì jǐ de de 接触jiē chù jiē chù zhě zhě 追踪zhuī zōng zhuī zōng 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng bìng bìng 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 病例bìng lì bìng lì 访谈fǎng tán fǎng tán
Low uptake was partly because Australians chose not to use it after early skepticism. 4. **Cost and timeline**: The app cost $9.2 million by October 2021 [1], but the poor performance became apparent relatively quickly.
联邦政府lián bāng zhèng fǔ lián bāng zhèng fǔ de de 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn 各州gè zhōu gè zhōu yǒu yǒu 责任zé rèn zé rèn 报告bào gào bào gào 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn de de 内容nèi róng nèi róng 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 一定yí dìng yí dìng de de 技术jì shù jì shù 合理性hé lǐ xìng hé lǐ xìng 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ běn běn 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ gèng gèng 透明tòu míng tòu míng 跟踪gēn zōng gēn zōng 公布gōng bù gōng bù 收集shōu jí shōu jí de de 数据shù jù shù jù
The government continued funding it despite evidence of failure, which was the more substantive issue than the transparency question.
33 3 .. . ** * ** * gāi gāi 应用程序yìng yòng chéng xù yìng yòng chéng xù shì shì 自愿zì yuàn zì yuàn de de ** * ** * COVIDSafeCOVIDSafe COVIDSafe 应用程序yìng yòng chéng xù yìng yòng chéng xù 依赖yī lài yī lài 自愿zì yuàn zì yuàn 用户yòng hù yòng hù 参与cān yù cān yù 蓝牙lán yá lán yá 近距离jìn jù lí jìn jù lí 检测jiǎn cè jiǎn cè zhè zhè 在技术上zài jì shù shàng zài jì shù shàng bèi bèi 证明zhèng míng zhèng míng shì shì 可靠kě kào kě kào de de
接受jiē shòu jiē shòu 率低lǜ dī lǜ dī 部分bù fèn bù fèn 是因为shì yīn wèi shì yīn wèi 澳大利亚人ào dà lì yà rén ào dà lì yà rén zài zài 早期zǎo qī zǎo qī 怀疑huái yí huái yí hòu hòu 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng
44 4 .. . ** * ** * 成本chéng běn chéng běn 时间shí jiān shí jiān 线xiàn xiàn ** * ** * gāi gāi 应用程序yìng yòng chéng xù yìng yòng chéng xù dào dào 20212021 2021 nián nián 1010 10 yuè yuè 耗资hào zī hào zī 920920 920 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] dàn dàn 糟糕zāo gāo zāo gāo de de 表现biǎo xiàn biǎo xiàn 相对xiāng duì xiāng duì jiào jiào kuài kuài jiù jiù 变得biàn dé biàn dé 明显míng xiǎn míng xiǎn
尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn yǒu yǒu 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 失败shī bài shī bài 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ réng réng 继续jì xù jì xù wèi wèi 提供tí gōng tí gōng 资金zī jīn zī jīn 这比zhè bǐ zhè bǐ 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 问题wèn tí wèn tí 更为gèng wéi gèng wéi 实质性shí zhì xìng shí zhì xìng

来源可信度评估

ZDNetZDNet ZDNet 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán shì shì yóu yóu ZiffZiff Ziff DavisDavis Davis 拥有yōng yǒu yōng yǒu de de 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 科技kē jì kē jì 出版物chū bǎn wù chū bǎn wù
The ZDNet article (original source) is a mainstream Australian technology publication owned by Ziff Davis.
作者zuò zhě zuò zhě CampbellCampbell Campbell KwanKwan Kwan shì shì 一名yī míng yī míng 科技kē jì kē jì 记者jì zhě jì zhě
Campbell Kwan, the author, is a technology reporter.
gāi gāi 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng shì shì yóu yóu 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 特别tè bié tè bié 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 官方guān fāng guān fāng 调查结果diào chá jié guǒ diào chá jié guǒ 新南威尔士xīn nán wēi ěr shì xīn nán wēi ěr shì 大学dà xué dà xué 独立dú lì dú lì 研究yán jiū yán jiū 支持zhī chí zhī chí de de 事实shì shí shì shí 报道bào dào bào dào 两者liǎng zhě liǎng zhě dōu dōu shì shì 高度gāo dù gāo dù 可信kě xìn kě xìn de de 来源lái yuán lái yuán
The article is factual reporting backed by the Senate Select Committee's official findings and independent UNSW research—both highly credible sources.
gāi gāi 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 适当shì dàng shì dàng 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng le le 官方guān fāng guān fāng 来源lái yuán lái yuán bìng bìng 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng le le 同行tóng háng tóng háng 评议píng yì píng yì 研究yán jiū yán jiū de de 数据shù jù shù jù [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
The article appropriately quotes official sources and cites data from peer-reviewed research [2].
参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn COVIDCOVID COVID -- - 1919 19 特别tè bié tè bié 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 本身běn shēn běn shēn yóu yóu LaborLabor Labor zhàn zhàn 主导zhǔ dǎo zhǔ dǎo LaborLabor Labor 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán 构成gòu chéng gòu chéng 多数duō shù duō shù ABCABC ABC 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng zài zài 报告bào gào bào gào 分析fēn xī fēn xī zhōng zhōng 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū le le zhè zhè 一点yì diǎn yì diǎn [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
The Senate Select Committee on COVID-19 itself had Labor dominance (Labor senators formed the majority), which the ABC article notes in its analysis of the report [3].
自由党zì yóu dǎng zì yóu dǎng 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán JamesJames James PatersonPaterson Paterson 国家guó jiā guó jiā dǎng dǎng 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán PerinPerin Perin DaveyDavey Davey 发表fā biǎo fā biǎo le le 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 声明shēng míng shēng míng 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì "" " bèi bèi 用作yòng zuò yòng zuò LaborLabor Labor 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán duì duì 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 攻击gōng jī gōng jī de de 工具gōng jù gōng jù "" " [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
Liberal Senator James Paterson and Nationals Senator Perin Davey issued a dissenting statement claiming the committee had been "used as a vehicle in which Labor senators have pursued partisan attacks on the government" [3].
这是zhè shì zhè shì 相关xiāng guān xiāng guān 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 报告bào gào bào gào 虽然suī rán suī rán zài zài 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng yǒu yǒu 根据gēn jù gēn jù 但是dàn shì dàn shì yóu yóu 一个yí gè yí gè LaborLabor Labor zhàn zhàn 主导zhǔ dǎo zhǔ dǎo de de 机构jī gòu jī gòu 制作zhì zuò zhì zuò de de bìng bìng 包含bāo hán bāo hán le le LaborLabor Labor 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 一致yí zhì yí zhì de de 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì
This is relevant context—the committee report, while factually grounded, was produced by a Labor-dominated body and included recommendations aligned with Labor policy positions.
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做过zuò guò zuò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng
**Did Labor do something similar?** Under the Rudd/Gillard governments (2007-2013), there was no equivalent national contact tracing app, as mobile technology and pandemic preparedness frameworks were different at that time.
** * ** *
Australia's response to pandemic preparedness was largely inherited by the Coalition government in 2013.
zài zài 陆克文lù kè wén lù kè wén // / 吉拉德jí lā dé jí lā dé 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 时期shí qī shí qī 20072007 2007 -- - 20132013 2013 nián nián 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu equivalentequivalent equivalent de de 国家guó jiā guó jiā 接触jiē chù jiē chù zhě zhě 追踪zhuī zōng zhuī zōng 应用程序yìng yòng chéng xù yìng yòng chéng xù 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi 当时dāng shí dāng shí de de 移动yí dòng yí dòng 技术jì shù jì shù 疫情yì qíng yì qíng 防备fáng bèi fáng bèi 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 不同bù tóng bù tóng
However, the broader issue of government transparency around data collection is relevant.
澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 对大duì dà duì dà 流行病liú xíng bìng liú xíng bìng 防备fáng bèi fáng bèi de de 应对yìng duì yìng duì 措施cuò shī cuò shī zài zài 很大hěn dà hěn dà 程度chéng dù chéng dù shàng shàng shì shì yóu yóu CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 20132013 2013 nián nián 继承jì chéng jì chéng de de
Labor has historically advocated for **greater transparency** in government pandemic responses, which is why Labor senators pushed the COVID-19 committee to examine this issue.
然而rán ér rán ér 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 围绕wéi rào wéi rào 数据shù jù shù jù 收集shōu jí shōu jí de de 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 这一zhè yī zhè yī gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí shì shì 相关xiāng guān xiāng guān de de
This suggests Labor would likely have been more transparent about data collection failure, though we don't have direct precedent since Labor wasn't in government during the pandemic.
LaborLabor Labor 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ shàng shàng 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng zài zài 流行病liú xíng bìng liú xíng bìng 应对yìng duì yìng duì zhōng zhōng ** * ** * 提高tí gāo tí gāo 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù ** * ** * zhè zhè 就是jiù shì jiù shì 为什么wèi shén me wèi shén me LaborLabor Labor 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán 推动tuī dòng tuī dòng COVIDCOVID COVID -- - 1919 19 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 审查shěn chá shěn chá 这一zhè yī zhè yī 问题wèn tí wèn tí
The issue of government intransparency around failed programs is not unique to the Coalition—it's a general government tendency.
zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng LaborLabor Labor 可能kě néng kě néng huì huì duì duì 数据shù jù shù jù 收集shōu jí shōu jí 失败shī bài shī bài 更加gèng jiā gèng jiā 透明tòu míng tòu míng 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 我们wǒ men wǒ men 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 先例xiān lì xiān lì 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi LaborLabor Labor zài zài 流行liú xíng liú xíng 期间qī jiān qī jiān zài zài 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng
However, the specific refusal to publish COVIDSafe metrics appears to have been distinctive to this app and the Coalition government's handling of it.
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ duì duì 失败shī bài shī bài 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 透明tòu míng tòu míng de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu 这是zhè shì zhè shì 一般yì bān yì bān de de 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng
然而rán ér rán ér 拒绝jù jué jù jué 公布gōng bù gōng bù COVIDSafeCOVIDSafe COVIDSafe 指标zhǐ biāo zhǐ biāo de de 具体做法jù tǐ zuò fǎ jù tǐ zuò fǎ 似乎sì hū sì hū shì shì gāi gāi 应用程序yìng yòng chéng xù yìng yòng chéng xù CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 处理chǔ lǐ chǔ lǐ 方式fāng shì fāng shì de de 独特dú tè dú tè zhī zhī chù chù
🌐

平衡视角

虽然suī rán suī rán 批评者pī píng zhě pī píng zhě 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 故意gù yì gù yì 掩盖yǎn gài yǎn gài COVIDSafeCOVIDSafe COVIDSafe de de 失败shī bài shī bài 避免bì miǎn bì miǎn 问责wèn zé wèn zé dàn dàn yǒu yǒu 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 合法hé fǎ hé fǎ de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng diǎn diǎn
While critics argue the government deliberately obscured COVIDSafe's failure to avoid accountability, there are several legitimate contextual points: 1. **The complexity of cross-government data**: Contact tracing data lives with state health authorities, not the federal government.
11 1 .. . ** * ** * kuà kuà 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 数据shù jù shù jù de de 复杂性fù zá xìng fù zá xìng ** * ** * 接触jiē chù jiē chù zhě zhě 追踪zhuī zōng zhuī zōng 数据shù jù shù jù yóu yóu 各州gè zhōu gè zhōu 卫生wèi shēng wèi shēng 当局dāng jú dāng jú 掌握zhǎng wò zhǎng wò ér ér fēi fēi 联邦政府lián bāng zhèng fǔ lián bāng zhèng fǔ
The government technically wasn't hiding data it never collected—the data was generated by states conducting interviews.
从技术上cóng jì shù shàng cóng jì shù shàng jiǎng jiǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ bìng bìng 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 隐藏yǐn cáng yǐn cáng 从未cóng wèi cóng wèi 收集shōu jí shōu jí guò guò de de 数据shù jù shù jù 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 数据shù jù shù jù shì shì yóu yóu 各州gè zhōu gè zhōu 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 访谈fǎng tán fǎng tán 生成shēng chéng shēng chéng de de
However, the government **could have** more proactively tracked and published the limited data it did have about the app's actual performance. 2. **The real problem was continued funding, not transparency**: The more substantive criticism isn't whether the government published data—it's that the government continued funding an app it knew was ineffective.
然而rán ér rán ér 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ ** * ** * běn běn 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ ** * ** * gèng gèng 主动zhǔ dòng zhǔ dòng 跟踪gēn zōng gēn zōng 公布gōng bù gōng bù 掌握zhǎng wò zhǎng wò de de 关于guān yú guān yú 应用程序yìng yòng chéng xù yìng yòng chéng xù 实际shí jì shí jì 表现biǎo xiàn biǎo xiàn de de 有限yǒu xiàn yǒu xiàn 数据shù jù shù jù
The Senate committee's key recommendation was to "cease any future expenditure of public funds on the failed COVIDSafe application" [1], not just to publish historical data. 3. **Responsibility-shifting was technically defensible but poorly communicated**: The government's statement that states are responsible for reporting contacts detected through their systems has some validity.
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí shì shì 继续jì xù jì xù 提供tí gōng tí gōng 资金zī jīn zī jīn ér ér fēi fēi 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù ** * ** * gèng gèng 实质性shí zhì xìng shí zhì xìng de de 批评pī píng pī píng 在于zài yú zài yú 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 公布gōng bù gōng bù le le 数据shù jù shù jù ér ér 在于zài yú zài yú 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 继续jì xù jì xù wèi wèi 一个yí gè yí gè 已知yǐ zhī yǐ zhī 无效wú xiào wú xiào de de 应用程序yìng yòng chéng xù yìng yòng chéng xù 提供tí gōng tí gōng 资金zī jīn zī jīn
Contact tracing is a state responsibility in the Australian federal system.
参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì de de 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì shì shì "" " 停止tíng zhǐ tíng zhǐ duì duì 失败shī bài shī bài de de COVIDSafeCOVIDSafe COVIDSafe 应用程序yìng yòng chéng xù yìng yòng chéng xù de de 任何rèn hé rèn hé 未来wèi lái wèi lái 公共gōng gòng gōng gòng 资金zī jīn zī jīn 支出zhī chū zhī chū "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] ér ér 不仅仅bù jǐn jǐn bù jǐn jǐn shì shì 公布gōng bù gōng bù 历史数据lì shǐ shù jù lì shǐ shù jù
However, the government could have been more proactive in aggregating and publishing what little data existed about the app's performance. 4. **Independent research filled the gap**: UNSW researchers independently studied the app's effectiveness and published peer-reviewed findings showing 0.1% contact detection rate [2].
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 推卸责任tuī xiè zé rèn tuī xiè zé rèn 在技术上zài jì shù shàng zài jì shù shàng shì shì 可辩护kě biàn hù kě biàn hù de de dàn dàn 沟通gōu tōng gōu tōng 不力bù lì bù lì ** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 关于guān yú guān yú 各州gè zhōu gè zhōu yǒu yǒu 责任zé rèn zé rèn 报告bào gào bào gào 通过tōng guò tōng guò 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng 检测jiǎn cè jiǎn cè dào dào de de 接触jiē chù jiē chù zhě zhě de de 声明shēng míng shēng míng 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 一定yí dìng yí dìng de de 有效性yǒu xiào xìng yǒu xiào xìng
Academic research and the Senate committee ultimately provided the transparency the government didn't. **Key context:** This is **not unique to the Coalition**—most governments are reluctant to publicize failed programs.
zài zài 澳大利亚联邦ào dà lì yà lián bāng ào dà lì yà lián bāng 制度zhì dù zhì dù zhōng zhōng 接触jiē chù jiē chù zhě zhě 追踪zhuī zōng zhuī zōng shì shì zhōu zhōu de de 责任zé rèn zé rèn
However, the specific dynamic where a federal government funds an app but then claims responsibility for publishing effectiveness data belongs to the state is somewhat distinctive.
然而rán ér rán ér 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ běn běn 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ gèng gèng 主动zhǔ dòng zhǔ dòng 汇总huì zǒng huì zǒng 公布gōng bù gōng bù 关于guān yú guān yú 应用程序yìng yòng chéng xù yìng yòng chéng xù 表现biǎo xiàn biǎo xiàn de de 少量shǎo liàng shǎo liàng 数据shù jù shù jù
The more notable issue is that the government funded a clearly ineffective app for years despite mounting evidence of failure.
44 4 .. . ** * ** * 独立dú lì dú lì 研究yán jiū yán jiū 填补tián bǔ tián bǔ le le zhè zhè 空白kòng bái kòng bái ** * ** * 新南威尔士xīn nán wēi ěr shì xīn nán wēi ěr shì 大学dà xué dà xué 研究yán jiū yán jiū 人员rén yuán rén yuán 独立dú lì dú lì 研究yán jiū yán jiū le le gāi gāi 应用程序yìng yòng chéng xù yìng yòng chéng xù de de 有效性yǒu xiào xìng yǒu xiào xìng bìng bìng 发表fā biǎo fā biǎo le le 同行tóng háng tóng háng 评议píng yì píng yì de de 研究yán jiū yán jiū 结果jié guǒ jié guǒ 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì 接触jiē chù jiē chù zhě zhě 检测jiǎn cè jiǎn cè 率为lǜ wèi lǜ wèi 0.1%0.1% 0.1% [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
学术研究xué shù yán jiū xué shù yán jiū 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 提供tí gōng tí gōng le le 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 提供tí gōng tí gōng de de 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ** * ** * zhè zhè ** * ** * 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu ** * ** * 大多数dà duō shù dà duō shù 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ dōu dōu 愿意yuàn yì yuàn yì 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 失败shī bài shī bài de de 计划jì huà jì huà
然而rán ér rán ér 联邦政府lián bāng zhèng fǔ lián bāng zhèng fǔ 资助zī zhù zī zhù 一个yí gè yí gè 应用程序yìng yòng chéng xù yìng yòng chéng xù 然后rán hòu rán hòu 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 公布gōng bù gōng bù 有效性yǒu xiào xìng yǒu xiào xìng 数据shù jù shù jù de de 责任zé rèn zé rèn 属于shǔ yú shǔ yú 州政府zhōu zhèng fǔ zhōu zhèng fǔ de de 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 动态dòng tài dòng tài zài zài 某种程度mǒu zhǒng chéng dù mǒu zhǒng chéng dù shàng shàng shì shì 独特dú tè dú tè de de
gèng gèng 值得注意zhí de zhù yì zhí de zhù yì de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí shì shì 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn yǒu yǒu 越来越yuè lái yuè yuè lái yuè duō duō de de 失败shī bài shī bài 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 仍为réng wèi réng wèi 一个yí gè yí gè 明显míng xiǎn míng xiǎn 无效wú xiào wú xiào de de 应用程序yìng yòng chéng xù yìng yòng chéng xù 提供tí gōng tí gōng le le 多年duō nián duō nián de de 资金zī jīn zī jīn

属实

7.0

/ 10

联邦政府lián bāng zhèng fǔ lián bāng zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 拒绝jù jué jù jué 公布gōng bù gōng bù COVIDSafeCOVIDSafe COVIDSafe 接触jiē chù jiē chù zhě zhě 识别shí bié shí bié 数据shù jù shù jù bìng bìng 确实què shí què shí jiāng jiāng 责任zé rèn zé rèn 归咎于guī jiù yú guī jiù yú 州政府zhōu zhèng fǔ zhōu zhèng fǔ
The federal government did refuse to publish COVIDSafe contact identification numbers and did attribute responsibility to state governments.
然而rán ér rán ér gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng 简化jiǎn huà jiǎn huà le le gèng gèng 复杂fù zá fù zá de de 联邦lián bāng lián bāng -- - zhōu zhōu 问题wèn tí wèn tí bìng bìng 忽略hū lüè hū lüè le le 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí shì shì zài zài 证明zhèng míng zhèng míng 无效wú xiào wú xiào de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng xià xià 继续jì xù jì xù 提供tí gōng tí gōng 资金zī jīn zī jīn ér ér 不仅仅bù jǐn jǐn bù jǐn jǐn shì shì 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 问题wèn tí wèn tí
However, the claim simplifies a more complex federal-state issue and omits that the real problem was continued funding despite proven ineffectiveness, not just transparency.

📚 来源与引用 (5)

  1. 1
    Senate committee calls for funding of failed COVIDSafe app to be dropped

    Senate committee calls for funding of failed COVIDSafe app to be dropped

    From May to November 2020, the COVIDSafe app chipped in 0.1% of all close contact detections in New South Wales.

    ZDNET
  2. 2
    unsw.edu.au

    The COVIDSafe app was designed to help contact tracers. We crunched the numbers to see what really happened

    Unsw Edu

  3. 3
    Key takeaways from Senate COVID-19 committee final report

    Key takeaways from Senate COVID-19 committee final report

    From lockdowns, to the international border closure and the vaccine rollout, a Senate committee has been scrutinising the government's response to COVID-19 since the start of the pandemic. Here are some of the main points from its final report.

    Abc Net
  4. 4
    The COVIDSafe app was designed to help contact tracers. We crunched the numbers to see what really happened

    The COVIDSafe app was designed to help contact tracers. We crunched the numbers to see what really happened

    Instead of making the lives of contact tracers easier, analysis shows the expensive technology missed contacts and added to their workload.

    The Conversation
  5. 5
    PDF

    Report on the operation and effectiveness of COVIDSafe and the National COVIDSafe Data Store

    Health Gov • PDF Document

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。