Bahagyang Totoo

Rating: 6.0/10

Coalition
C0657

Ang Claim

“Ini-scrap ang Countering Violent Extremists Program, na naglalaman ng mga grant sa mga programang pang-komunidad.”
Orihinal na Pinagmulan: Matthew Davis
Sinuri: 31 Jan 2026

Orihinal na Pinagmulan

FACTUAL NA BERIPIKASYON

**Tama ang claim sa mga aktwal na detalye**.
The claim is **factually accurate**.
Ang Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) program, na kasama ang mga grant para sa mga programang pang-komunidad sa ilalim ng "Building Community Resilience" component, ay talagang pinabayaang mag-lapse noong Hunyo 2014 sa ilalim ng Abbott government [1].
The Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) program, which included grants for community programs under the "Building Community Resilience" component, was indeed allowed to lapse in June 2014 under the Abbott government [1].
Ang programang ito ay orihinal na itinatag sa ilalim ng Rudd Labor government noong 2009 bilang unang national CVE framework ng Australia [2].
The program was originally established under the Rudd Labor government in 2009 as Australia's first national CVE framework [2].
Si Waleed Aly, sa kanyang artikulo sa Sydney Morning Herald noong Agosto 7, 2014, ay tukoy na nagsabing ang Abbott government ay "pinabayaang mag-lapse noong Hunyo" ang Countering Violent Extremism program "at partikular ang mga grant nito para sa mga programang pang-komunidad na may layuning 'Building Community Resilience'" [1].
Waleed Aly, in his August 7, 2014 Sydney Morning Herald opinion piece, specifically noted that the Abbott government "let lapse in June" the Countering Violent Extremism program "and in particular its grants for community programs aimed at 'Building Community Resilience'" [1].
Ang pagkalapse ay nangyari sa panahon na sinusuri muli ng gobyerno ang kanilang counter-terrorism approach.
The lapse occurred during a period when the government was re-evaluating its counter-terrorism approach.
Noong Agosto 2014, inihayag ng Abbott government ang $630 million sa bagong counter-terrorism measures sa loob ng apat na taon, na pangunahing nakatuon sa mga security agency (ASIO, AFP, ASIS) sa halip na sa mga programang pang-komunidad [3].
In August 2014, the Abbott government announced $630 million in new counter-terrorism measures over four years, focused primarily on security agencies (ASIO, AFP, ASIS) rather than community-based programs [3].

Nawawalang Konteksto

Ang claim ay hindi nabanggit ang ilang mahahalagang konteksto: 1. **Pagpapanumbalik ng Programa**: Ang CVE program ay sa huli ay naibalik sa ilalim ng Coalition government.
The claim omits several important contextual elements: 1. **Program Reinstatement**: The CVE program was eventually reinstated under the Coalition government.
Pagsapit ng 2021, ang Morrison government ay nag-invest ng karagdagang $61.7 million sa mga CVE program, halos doble ng kabuuang investment mula nang simulan ang mga inisyatibang ito noong 2013 [4]. 2. **Rasyonale ng Strategic Shift**: Ang paunang pagkalapse ay nagkataong kasabay ng mas malawak na pagbabago tungo sa tinatawag ng gobyernong "hard" counter-terrorism measures - mas mataas na pondo para sa intelligence agencies, bagong legislative powers para sa monitoring at detention, at pagtutok sa mga foreign fighters na bumabalik mula sa Syria at Iraq [3]. 3. **Konteksto ng Timeline**: Ang programang ito ay nag-lapse noong Hunyo 2014 sa panahon ng heightened security concerns tungkol sa mga Australyano na lumalaban kasama ng mga terrorist organization sa Syria at Iraq.
By 2021, the Morrison government had invested an additional $61.7 million into CVE programs, nearly doubling total investment since such initiatives began in 2013 [4]. 2. **Strategic Shift Rationale**: The initial lapse coincided with a broader shift toward what the government termed "hard" counter-terrorism measures - increased funding for intelligence agencies, new legislative powers for monitoring and detention, and a focus on foreign fighters returning from Syria and Iraq [3]. 3. **Timeline Context**: The program lapsed in June 2014 during a period of heightened security concerns about Australians fighting with terrorist organizations in Syria and Iraq.
Ang gobyerno ay nag-prioritize ng law enforcement at intelligence approaches sa halip na community engagement sa panahong ito [3]. 4. **Predecessor ng Programa**: Ang CVE program ay orihinal na nilikha ng Rudd Labor government noong 2009, ibig sabihin ang Coalition ay minana sa halip na nag-umpisa ng community-based approach na ito [2].
The government prioritized law enforcement and intelligence approaches over community engagement during this period [3]. 4. **Program Predecessor**: The CVE program was originally created by the Rudd Labor government in 2009, meaning the Coalition inherited rather than initiated this community-based approach [2].

Pagsusuri ng Kredibilidad ng Pinagmulan

Ang ibinigay na orihinal na pinagkunan ay isang **opinion piece** ni Waleed Aly sa Sydney Morning Herald (Agosto 7, 2014) [1].
The original source provided is an **opinion piece** by Waleed Aly in the Sydney Morning Herald (August 7, 2014) [1].
Mga mahahalagang konsiderasyon: - **Publication**: Ang SMH ay isang mainstream, reputable na Australian news outlet na may center-left na editorial leanings - **May-akda**: Si Waleed Aly ay isang academic (lecturer sa politics sa Monash University), broadcaster (ABC Radio National), at Fairfax columnist na kilala para sa mga progresibong perspektiba - **Uri ng Pinagkunan**: Ito ay isang opinion/commentary piece, hindi straight news reporting - **Mga Partisan na Konsiderasyon**: Ang artikulo ay kritikal sa paghawak ng Abbott government sa parehong Section 18C at counter-terrorism policy - **Mga Factual na Claim**: Ang tiyak na claim tungkol sa CVE program na nag-lapse noong Hunyo 2014 ay inihahain bilang factual sa loob ng opinion piece Ang pinagkunan ay kredibil para sa sentrong factual na pahayag ngunit dapat na maunawaan bilang naghahain ng isang kritikal na perspektiba sa mga pagpili ng gobyerno sa polisiya.
Key considerations: - **Publication**: SMH is a mainstream, reputable Australian news outlet with center-left editorial leanings - **Author**: Waleed Aly is an academic (Monash University lecturer in politics), broadcaster (ABC Radio National), and Fairfax columnist known for progressive perspectives - **Nature of Source**: This is an opinion/commentary piece, not straight news reporting - **Partisan Considerations**: The piece was critical of the Abbott government's handling of both Section 18C and counter-terrorism policy - **Factual Claims**: The specific claim about the CVE program lapsing in June 2014 is presented as factual within the opinion piece The source is credible for the core factual assertion but should be understood as presenting a critical perspective on government policy choices.
⚖️

Paghahambing sa Labor

**Ginawa ba ni Labor ang katulad na bagay?** **Labor ang Lumikha ng Programa**: Ang CVE strategy ay aktwal na sinimulan sa ilalim ng Rudd Labor government noong 2009 sa paglikha ng isang CVE national framework, na una sa uri nito sa Australia [2].
**Did Labor do something similar?** **Labor Created the Program**: The CVE strategy was actually initiated under the Rudd Labor government in 2009 with the creation of a CVE national framework, which was the first of its kind in Australia [2].
Ang Labor ay nagtatag ng "Building Community Resilience" grants program na siya namang pinabayaang mag-lapse ng Coalition. **Approach ni Labor**: Ang mga Rudd/Gillard governments ay sumunod sa isang community-engagement model na kinikilala ang mga komunidad bilang "important player[s] collaborating with government to defeat terrorism" [2].
Labor established the "Building Community Resilience" grants program that the Coalition subsequently allowed to lapse. **Labor's Approach**: The Rudd/Gillard governments pursued a community-engagement model that identified communities as "important player[s] collaborating with government to defeat terrorism" [2].
Ang soft/engagement approach na ito ay kakaiba sa paunang shift ng Coalition tungo sa hard security measures noong 2014. **Komparatibong Pagsusuri**: Ang claim ay nagmumungkahing ang Coalition ay natatanging nag-scrap ng isang mahalagang programa.
This soft/engagement approach contrasted with the Coalition's initial shift toward hard security measures in 2014. **Comparative Analysis**: The claim implies the Coalition uniquely scrapped a valuable program.
Sa katotohanan: - Ang Labor ang lumikha ng programang ito (2009) - Ang Coalition ay pinabayaang mag-lapse ito (Hunyo 2014) - Ang Coalition ay sa huli ay nagbalik at nagpalawak ng CVE funding (pagsapit ng 2021, $61.7 million sa karagdagang investment) [4] Ang pattern na ito ay nagpapakita na ang parehong mga gobyerno ay nakikipagpunyagi sa pagbalanse ng "hard" security (intelligence, policing) at "soft" approaches (community engagement, grants).
In reality: - Labor created the program (2009) - Coalition allowed it to lapse (June 2014) - Coalition later reinstated and expanded CVE funding (by 2021, $61.7 million in additional investment) [4] This pattern shows both governments wrestling with balancing "hard" security (intelligence, policing) with "soft" approaches (community engagement, grants).
🌐

Balanseng Pananaw

**Ang Buong Kuwento:** Ang Abbott government ay pinabayaang mag-lapse ang CVE community grants program noong Hunyo 2014 bilang bahagi ng isang strategic pivot tungo sa tinatawag nilang mas agarang security threats - partikular na ang mga Australyano na naglalakbay patungo Syria at Iraq upang lumaban kasama ng mga terrorist organization at ang potensyal na pagbalik bilang mga radicalized threat [1][3]. **Puna**: Ang mga kritiko tulad ni Waleed Aly ay nagsabing ito ay counterproductive, na nagpapahiwatig na "ang mga social dimensions ng terrorism" ay nangangailangan ng community engagement at ang gobyerno ay sumisira sa "Team Australia" sa pamamagitan ng pagputol sa mga programang nagtatayo ng tiwala sa Muslim communities [1].
**The Full Story:** The Abbott government allowed the CVE community grants program to lapse in June 2014 as part of a strategic pivot toward what it considered more immediate security threats - particularly Australians traveling to Syria and Iraq to fight with terrorist organizations and potentially returning as radicalized threats [1][3]. **Criticism**: Critics like Waleed Aly argued this was counterproductive, noting that "the social dimensions of terrorism" require community engagement and that the government was undermining "Team Australia" by cutting programs that built trust with Muslim communities [1].
Ang mga Muslim community leaders ay sa huli ay nagpahayag ng mga pag-aalala tungkol sa negatibong epekto ng counter-terrorism policies sa community confidence at tiwala sa pakikipagtulungan sa mga awtoridad [2]. **Pananaw ng Gobyerno**: Ang Agosto 2014 announcement ng Coalition ay nag-diin na "ang banta sa Australia at mga Australyano mula sa mga extremist ay totoo at lumalaki" at nakatuon sa pagbibigay sa "mga security agency ng resources at legislative powers na kailangan upang labanan ang home-grown terrorism" [3].
Muslim community leaders later expressed concerns about the negative impact of counter-terrorism policies on community confidence and trust in working with authorities [2]. **Government Perspective**: The Coalition's August 2014 announcement emphasized that "the threat to Australia and Australians from extremists is real and growing" and focused on giving "security agencies the resources and legislative powers needed to combat home-grown terrorism" [3].
Ang $630 million package ay nag-prioritize ng intelligence collection, border protection, at monitoring capabilities sa halip na mga community grants. **Ebolusyon**: Pagsapit ng 2021, ang Coalition ay nakabalik, halos dinoble ang CVE investment mula noong 2013, na kinikilala na ang mga community-based approaches ay kinakailangang komplemento sa mga security measures [4]. **Mahalagang Konteksto**: Hindi ito isang permanenteng pag-abolish kundi isang pansamantalang pagkalapse sa panahon ng isang policy recalibration.
The $630 million package prioritized intelligence collection, border protection, and monitoring capabilities over community grants. **Evolution**: By 2021, the Coalition had come full circle, nearly doubling CVE investment since 2013, acknowledging that community-based approaches were necessary complements to security measures [4]. **Key Context**: This was not a permanent abolition but a temporary lapse during a policy recalibration.
Ang program ay sa huli ay naibalik at pinalawak.
The program was later restored and expanded.

BAHAGYANG TOTOO

6.0

sa 10

Ang sentrong claim ay tama - ang CVE program na may kasamang mga grant para sa komunidad ay talagang pinabayaang mag-lapse noong Hunyo 2014.
The core claim is accurate - the CVE program involving community grants was indeed allowed to lapse in June 2014.
Gayunpaman, ang claim ay kulang sa mahahalagang konteksto: (1) ang program ay sa huli ay naibalik at malaki ang itinaas sa ilalim ng parehong gobyerno, (2) ang pagkalapse ay nangyari sa panahon ng isang tiyak na security crisis (mga foreign fighter sa Syria/Iraq), at (3) ang Labor ang lumikha ng programang ito, ibig sabihin ang Coalition ay minana sa halip na nag-umpisa ng approach na ito.
However, the claim lacks important context: (1) the program was later reinstated and significantly expanded under the same government, (2) the lapse occurred during a specific security crisis (Syria/Iraq foreign fighters), and (3) Labor had created the program, meaning the Coalition inherited rather than originated this approach.
Ang paghahabi ay nagmumungkahi ng permanenteng pag-abandona sa community-based counter-terrorism, samantalang ang historical record ay nagpapakita ng isang pansamantalang strategic shift na sinundan ng pagpapanumbalik at pagpapalawig.
The framing suggests a permanent abandonment of community-based counter-terrorism, when the historical record shows a temporary strategic shift followed by restoration and expansion.

📚 MGA PINAGMULAN AT SANGGUNIAN (4)

  1. 1
    Abbott's 18C puzzle: linking terror and free speech raises interesting political questions

    Abbott's 18C puzzle: linking terror and free speech raises interesting political questions

    By dumping the repeal of Section 18C in the interests of unity, the Coalition is implicitly accepting the social dimensions of terrorism.

    The Sydney Morning Herald
  2. 2
    Perspectives on countering violent extremism

    Perspectives on countering violent extremism

    This research explores Australian Muslim leaders’ perspectives on the Federal Government’s countering violent terrorism policies and program, the efficacy of the government’s community engagement strategies, and the impact of political/media rhetoric and foreign policy on community trust and engagement. Using a mixed method approach, the study elicits recommendations from data provided by Muslim leaders for […]

    AMUST
  3. 3
    Abbott Kills 18C Repeal; New Counter-Terrorism Measures To Cost $630m Over Four Years

    Abbott Kills 18C Repeal; New Counter-Terrorism Measures To Cost $630m Over Four Years

    Text, video and audio of press conference with PM Tony Abbott, Foreign Minister Julie Bishop and A-G George Brandis, announcing new anti-terrorism measures and the dropping of legislation to repeal S18c of the Racial Discrimination Act.

    AustralianPolitics.com
  4. 4
    Significant new investment to counter all forms of violent extremism in Australia

    Significant new investment to counter all forms of violent extremism in Australia

    Minister for Home Affairs, Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs, Minister for Emergency Management.​​​

    Ministers for the Department of Home Affairs Website

Pamamaraan ng Rating Scale

1-3: MALI

Hindi tama sa katotohanan o malisyosong gawa-gawa.

4-6: BAHAGYA

May katotohanan ngunit kulang o baluktot ang konteksto.

7-9: HALOS TOTOO

Maliit na teknikal na detalye o isyu sa pagkakasulat.

10: TUMPAK

Perpektong na-verify at patas ayon sa konteksto.

Pamamaraan: Ang mga rating ay tinutukoy sa pamamagitan ng cross-referencing ng opisyal na mga rekord ng pamahalaan, independiyenteng mga organisasyong nag-fact-check, at mga primaryang dokumento.