The claim references Australia's 2019-2020 bushfire season (known as "Black Summer"), which was indeed the nation's most severe recorded bushfire event.
However, the casualty and damage figures in the claim require clarification.
**Black Summer Impact:**
The bushfire season ran from September 2019 to March 2020, with peak intensity in December 2019-January 2020 [1].
However, this figure increases significantly when accounting for smoke-related deaths: approximately 417 additional people died from particulate matter exposure, bringing total deaths to approximately 450+ [3].
The property damage was substantial: 3,094 homes were destroyed (not 9,000+), with total buildings destroyed reaching approximately 3,000+ structures [2].
The fire burned 24 million hectares of land and killed or displaced approximately 3 billion terrestrial vertebrates [2].
**Bushfire and Natural Hazards CRC Closure:**
The claim specifically concerns the Bushfire and Natural Hazards Cooperative Research Centre (BNHCRC).
The BNHCRC was established in 2013 and operated for 8 years with $47 million in federal funding [4].
* * * * Bushfire Bushfire and and Natural Natural Hazards Hazards CRC CRC 的 de 關閉 guān bì : : * * * *
However, the closure decision was not made "weeks after" the bushfire season in response to Black Summer.
**Timeline Context:**
A 2015 review under the CRC program established new policy guidelines limiting research centres to a maximum of 10 years of funding with no extensions, effectively eliminating "priority public good funding" mechanisms [4].
該 gāi 說 shuō 法特 fǎ tè 別 bié 涉及 shè jí Bushfire Bushfire and and Natural Natural Hazards Hazards Cooperative Cooperative Research Research Centre Centre ( ( BNHCRC BNHCRC ) ) 。 。
The BNHCRC was already in its second funding term by this time.
This announcement occurred after the bushfires, but the policy causing the cessation had been established years earlier.
**Funding Extension:**
Importantly, in July 2020 (just months after the bushfire season), the Coalition government announced an $88 million funding reprieve for the centre's work, extending support over 10 years [4].
The BNHCRC transitioned to Natural Hazards Research Australia (NHRA) on 1 July 2021 with $85 million in federal funding over 10 years, maintaining research continuity [4].
Pre-existing Policy Framework:**
The closure wasn't a standalone decision made in response to the bushfires; it resulted from a 2015 CRC program review that changed funding policies across all cooperative research centres [4].
Decisions:**
While Senator Kim Carr's criticism came in March 2020 (weeks after the fires), the government had implemented the funding cessation policy years earlier.
Funding Continuation:**
The government responded to criticism by: (a) announcing $88 million in additional funding just months later (July 2020), and (b) establishing a replacement centre (NHRA) with $85 million in ongoing funding [4].
* * * * 3 3 . . 資助 zī zhù 延續 yán xù : : * * * *
This represents continuation of bushfire research capacity, not cessation.
**4.
Centre's Actual Research Value:**
The BNHCRC was highly regarded: it had researchers embedded with firefighting services during Black Summer, developed fire mapping tools credited with saving lives, created warning systems and modelling software, and was producing highly sought-after information on fire behaviour [4].
Labor's Own Approach:**
The Labor government, when it came to office in 2022, expanded rather than abandoned bushfire research funding, establishing an Australian Warning System and enhancing the Natural Hazards Research Australia program that had succeeded the BNHCRC [5].
As a Labor politician and former science minister, Carr had legitimate expertise in research funding but also clear partisan motivation to criticize a Coalition-era funding decision [6].
His criticism accurately represented the concern about research continuity but was framed in the most negative possible light (emphasizing the post-fires timing) rather than acknowledging the pre-existing policy framework or the subsequent funding extension.
**Secondary Sources Used in This Analysis:**
- Times Higher Education: Reputable academic publication with no obvious partisan bias; reported on the policy change and Labor criticism [7]
- Research Professional News: Industry publication for researchers; objective reporting on funding decisions [8]
- Wikipedia articles: Reflect consensus from multiple sources on facts, dates, and impacts [1], [2], [4]
- Government records: Official data on funding decisions and transitional arrangements [4]
搜尋內容 sōu xún nèi róng : : 「 「 Labor Labor government government defunding defunding bushfire bushfire research research 」 」 和 hé 「 「 Labor Labor bushfire bushfire research research policy policy 」 」
**Did Labor do something similar?**
Search conducted: "Labor government defunding bushfire research" and "Labor bushfire research policy"
**Finding regarding Labor's record on bushfire research funding:**
The Labor government's previous experience with bushfire research differed substantially.
Under Labor (2007-2013), bushfire research was integrated into standard research funding mechanisms, though the BNHCRC itself was established in 2013 (post-Labor) [4].
When Labor returned to office in 2022, it immediately committed to expanding disaster research funding through the Australian Warning System and enhancing the Natural Hazards Research Australia program, directing additional resources toward the exact area the Coalition had supposedly abandoned [5].
Labor's publicly stated position since the 2020 criticism period has been consistent: bushfire research requires dedicated, sustained government funding [6].
**Comparison assessment:** The evidence does not show Labor pursuing equivalent cuts to disaster research.
當 dāng Labor Labor 於 yú 2022 2022 年 nián 重新 chóng xīn 上台 shàng tái 時 shí , , 立即 lì jí 承諾 chéng nuò 通過 tōng guò Australian Australian Warning Warning System System 擴大災 kuò dà zāi 難 nán 研究 yán jiū 資助 zī zhù , , 並加強 bìng jiā qiáng Natural Natural Hazards Hazards Research Research Australia Australia 計劃 jì huà , , 將額外 jiāng é wài 資源導 zī yuán dǎo 向 xiàng Coalition Coalition 被 bèi 認為 rèn wèi 已放棄 yǐ fàng qì 的 de 確切 què qiè 領域 lǐng yù [ [ 5 5 ] ] 。 。
Labor's position has consistently been that bushfire research requires sustained federal funding support, a position validated by its funding decisions upon returning to government.
While critics argue that the Coalition ended dedicated bushfire research funding at a time when its importance was maximally demonstrated, several factors complicate this narrative:
**Coalition's Stated Rationale [4]:**
The government argued that under revised CRC program guidelines, centres completing two funding cycles should transition to alternative models (private/corporate partnerships, integration into universities, or successor structures).
Officials stated that the CRC program inherently delivered public benefit, making separate "public good" funding mechanisms unnecessary.
**Policy Implementation Challenge [4]:**
Senator Carr dismissed these transition proposals as unrealistic, arguing that bushfire research participants—primarily public agencies (state fire services) and universities—lacked independent resources to establish private ventures.
This highlighted a genuine tension between CRC policy and the realities of public research funding.
**Outcome-based Assessment:**
The Coalition did respond to Black Summer criticism by: providing $88 million in additional funding (July 2020), ensuring the research transitioned to Natural Hazards Research Australia with $85 million over 10 years, and funding specific Black Summer research projects with an additional $2 million [4].
This represents substantial commitment to maintaining research continuity, even if the funding mechanism changed.
**Key context:** This is not unique to the Coalition.
However, the timing of implementing this policy during and immediately after Australia's worst bushfire season created legitimate criticism about policy sensitivity and disaster response priorities.
**Expert Assessment:**
The closure of BNHCRC was described by researchers as "damaging" to integrated bushfire research capacity, validating Labor's concern [7].
這凸顯 zhè tū xiǎn 了 le CRC CRC 政策 zhèng cè 與 yǔ 公共 gōng gòng 研究 yán jiū 資助 zī zhù 現實 xiàn shí 之間 zhī jiān 的 de 真正 zhēn zhèng 張力 zhāng lì 。 。
However, the establishment of NHRA maintained substantial research continuity, suggesting that while institutional disruption occurred, research funding levels remained comparable.
Coalition Coalition 政府 zhèng fǔ 確實 què shí 終止 zhōng zhǐ 了 le Bushfire Bushfire and and Natural Natural Hazards Hazards Cooperative Cooperative Research Research Centre Centre 的 de 資助 zī zhù , , 且 qiě 該 gāi 終止 zhōng zhǐ 公告 gōng gào 是 shì 在 zài 澳洲 ào zhōu 最嚴 zuì yán 重叢 zhòng cóng 林火 lín huǒ 災季節 zāi jì jié 結束後數 jié shù hòu shù 週發布 zhōu fā bù 的 de 。 。
The Coalition government did cease funding for the Bushfire and Natural Hazards Cooperative Research Centre, and this cessation was announced weeks after Australia's worst bushfire season.
The property damage figure is significantly overstated (3,094 homes, not 9,000+) [2]
The claim accurately identifies a real policy decision that generated legitimate criticism, but omits key facts about funding extensions and transitional arrangements that provide essential context for assessing Coalition stewardship of bushfire research.
該 gāi 說 shuō 法準 fǎ zhǔn 確識別 què shí bié 了 le 一個 yī gè 確實 què shí 引發 yǐn fā 合理 hé lǐ 批評 pī píng 的 de 真實 zhēn shí 政策 zhèng cè 決定 jué dìng , , 但 dàn 省略 shěng lüè 了關 le guān 於 yú 資助 zī zhù 延期 yán qī 和 hé 過渡 guò dù 安排 ān pái 的 de 關鍵 guān jiàn 事實 shì shí , , 這些 zhè xiē 事實 shì shí 對 duì 評估 píng gū Coalition Coalition 對叢 duì cóng 林火 lín huǒ 災 zāi 研究 yán jiū 的 de 管治 guǎn zhì 至關 zhì guān 重要 zhòng yào 。 。
最終分數
6.0
/ 10
部分真實
Coalition Coalition 政府 zhèng fǔ 確實 què shí 終止 zhōng zhǐ 了 le Bushfire Bushfire and and Natural Natural Hazards Hazards Cooperative Cooperative Research Research Centre Centre 的 de 資助 zī zhù , , 且 qiě 該 gāi 終止 zhōng zhǐ 公告 gōng gào 是 shì 在 zài 澳洲 ào zhōu 最嚴 zuì yán 重叢 zhòng cóng 林火 lín huǒ 災季節 zāi jì jié 結束後數 jié shù hòu shù 週發布 zhōu fā bù 的 de 。 。
The Coalition government did cease funding for the Bushfire and Natural Hazards Cooperative Research Centre, and this cessation was announced weeks after Australia's worst bushfire season.
The property damage figure is significantly overstated (3,094 homes, not 9,000+) [2]
The claim accurately identifies a real policy decision that generated legitimate criticism, but omits key facts about funding extensions and transitional arrangements that provide essential context for assessing Coalition stewardship of bushfire research.
該 gāi 說 shuō 法準 fǎ zhǔn 確識別 què shí bié 了 le 一個 yī gè 確實 què shí 引發 yǐn fā 合理 hé lǐ 批評 pī píng 的 de 真實 zhēn shí 政策 zhèng cè 決定 jué dìng , , 但 dàn 省略 shěng lüè 了關 le guān 於 yú 資助 zī zhù 延期 yán qī 和 hé 過渡 guò dù 安排 ān pái 的 de 關鍵 guān jiàn 事實 shì shí , , 這些 zhè xiē 事實 shì shí 對 duì 評估 píng gū Coalition Coalition 對叢 duì cóng 林火 lín huǒ 災 zāi 研究 yán jiū 的 de 管治 guǎn zhì 至關 zhì guān 重要 zhòng yào 。 。