属实

评分: 6.0/10

Coalition
C0989

声明内容

“提出了一项法案,允许对担任民选职务的无薪工会官员处以最高5年监禁和最高34万澳元的罚款。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis

原始来源

事实核查

** * ** * 属实shǔ shí shǔ shí
**TRUE.** The Coalition government did introduce legislation that included criminal penalties of up to $340,000 and/or 5 years imprisonment for serious breaches of officers' duties in registered organisations.
** * ** * CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù le le 包含bāo hán bāo hán 刑事xíng shì xíng shì 处罚chǔ fá chǔ fá de de 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ duì duì 注册zhù cè zhù cè 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 官员guān yuán guān yuán 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 违反wéi fǎn wéi fǎn 职责zhí zé zhí zé de de 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi 最高zuì gāo zuì gāo 处以chǔ yǐ chǔ yǐ 3434 34 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 罚款fá kuǎn fá kuǎn // / huò huò 55 5 nián nián 监禁jiān jìn jiān jìn
The Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Amendment Bill 2014 was introduced by the Abbott government and passed in November 2016 under the Turnbull government [1].
20142014 2014 nián nián 公平gōng píng gōng píng 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 注册zhù cè zhù cè 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 修正xiū zhèng xiū zhèng 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn yóu yóu AbbottAbbott Abbott 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 提出tí chū tí chū 并于bìng yú bìng yú 20162016 2016 nián nián 1111 11 yuè yuè zài zài TurnbullTurnbull Turnbull 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 任期rèn qī rèn qī nèi nèi 获得huò dé huò dé 通过tōng guò tōng guò [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The bill established the Registered Organisations Commission (ROC) to monitor and regulate unions and employer associations.
gāi gāi 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 成立chéng lì chéng lì le le 注册zhù cè zhù cè 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì ROCROC ROC 负责fù zé fù zé 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 工会gōng huì gōng huì 雇主gù zhǔ gù zhǔ 协会xié huì xié huì
According to the second reading speech by Minister Christopher Pyne on 19 June 2014: "Criminal penalties are being introduced for serious breaches of officers' duties as well as offences in relation to the conduct of investigations under the Registered Organisations Act.
根据gēn jù gēn jù ChristopherChristopher Christopher PynePyne Pyne 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 20142014 2014 nián nián 66 6 yuè yuè 1919 19 de de 二读èr dú èr dú 演讲yǎn jiǎng yǎn jiǎng "" " 对于duì yú duì yú 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 违反wéi fǎn wéi fǎn 官员guān yuán guān yuán 职责zhí zé zhí zé de de 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 注册zhù cè zhù cè 组织法zǔ zhī fǎ zǔ zhī fǎ xiàng xiàng xià xià 调查diào chá diào chá 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi 有关yǒu guān yǒu guān de de 罪行zuì xíng zuì xíng xiàn xiàn 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù 刑事xíng shì xíng shì 处罚chǔ fá chǔ fá
The maximum penalties in these areas are $340,000 or five years imprisonment or both" [2].
这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 领域lǐng yù lǐng yù de de 最高zuì gāo zuì gāo 处罚chǔ fá chǔ fá wèi wèi 3434 34 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán huò huò 五年wǔ nián wǔ nián 监禁jiān jìn jiān jìn huò huò 两者liǎng zhě liǎng zhě 并罚bìng fá bìng fá "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
The penalties apply to "officers and employees of registered organisations who fail to exercise their powers or discharge duties in good faith and for a proper purpose" and where "an officer uses their position to gain advantage for themselves or someone else" [2].
这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 处罚chǔ fá chǔ fá 适用shì yòng shì yòng "" " 未能wèi néng wèi néng 善意shàn yì shàn yì qiě qiě 出于chū yú chū yú 正当zhèng dāng zhèng dāng 目的mù dì mù dì 行使xíng shǐ xíng shǐ 权力quán lì quán lì huò huò 履行lǚ xíng lǚ xíng 职责zhí zé zhí zé de de 注册zhù cè zhù cè 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 官员guān yuán guān yuán 雇员gù yuán gù yuán "" " 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí "" " 利用lì yòng lì yòng 职位zhí wèi zhí wèi wèi wèi 自己zì jǐ zì jǐ huò huò 他人tā rén tā rén 谋取móu qǔ móu qǔ 利益lì yì lì yì de de 官员guān yuán guān yuán "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
The Parliamentary Bills Digest notes that "many (mainly employer) registered organisations are very small, whilst other (mainly employee) organisations are large.
议会yì huì yì huì 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 摘要zhāi yào zhāi yào 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū "" " 许多xǔ duō xǔ duō 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào shì shì 雇主gù zhǔ gù zhǔ 注册zhù cè zhù cè 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 规模guī mó guī mó 很小hěn xiǎo hěn xiǎo ér ér 其他qí tā qí tā 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào shì shì 雇员gù yuán gù yuán 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 规模guī mó guī mó 较大jiào dà jiào dà
All are not-for-profit organisations with democratically elected officials, many of whom are unpaid" [3].
所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē dōu dōu shì shì 非营利fēi yíng lì fēi yíng lì 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī yóu yóu 民主选举mín zhǔ xuǎn jǔ mín zhǔ xuǎn jǔ 产生chǎn shēng chǎn shēng de de 官员guān yuán guān yuán 管理guǎn lǐ guǎn lǐ 其中qí zhōng qí zhōng 许多xǔ duō xǔ duō rén rén shì shì 无薪wú xīn wú xīn de de "" " [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
This confirms that unpaid elected officials would be subject to these penalties.
zhè zhè 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí le le 无薪wú xīn wú xīn 民选mín xuǎn mín xuǎn 官员guān yuán guān yuán jiāng jiāng 受到shòu dào shòu dào 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 处罚chǔ fá chǔ fá de de 约束yuē shù yuē shù

缺失背景

** * ** * 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 至关重要zhì guān zhòng yào zhì guān zhòng yào
**The legislative context is critical.** The bill was introduced in response to serious corruption scandals, most notably the Health Services Union (HSU) expenses affair involving Labor MP Craig Thomson and union boss Michael Williamson.
** * ** * gāi gāi 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn de de 提出tí chū tí chū shì shì 为了wèi le wèi le 应对yìng duì yìng duì 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng de de 腐败fǔ bài fǔ bài 丑闻chǒu wén chǒu wén 其中qí zhōng qí zhōng zuì zuì 引人注目yǐn rén zhù mù yǐn rén zhù mù de de shì shì 涉及shè jí shè jí 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 议员yì yuán yì yuán CraigCraig Craig ThomsonThomson Thomson 工会gōng huì gōng huì 老板lǎo bǎn lǎo bǎn MichaelMichael Michael WilliamsonWilliamson Williamson de de 卫生wèi shēng wèi shēng 服务fú wù fú wù 工会gōng huì gōng huì HSUHSU HSU 开支kāi zhī kāi zhī 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn
The Royal Commission into Trade Union Governance and Corruption, established by the Abbott government in March 2014, had revealed widespread governance failures and financial misconduct in some unions [4]. **The penalties were designed to match corporate standards.** The government explicitly stated these penalties were "consistent with those faced by companies and directors who break the law" [2].
AbbottAbbott Abbott 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 20142014 2014 nián nián 33 3 yuè yuè 成立chéng lì chéng lì de de 工会gōng huì gōng huì 治理zhì lǐ zhì lǐ 腐败fǔ bài fǔ bài 皇家huáng jiā huáng jiā 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 揭露jiē lù jiē lù le le 一些yī xiē yī xiē 工会gōng huì gōng huì zhōng zhōng 普遍存在pǔ biàn cún zài pǔ biàn cún zài de de 治理zhì lǐ zhì lǐ 失职shī zhí shī zhí 财务cái wù cái wù 不当bù dàng bù dàng 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi [[ [ 44 4 ]] ]
The rationale was that union officials who manage member funds should be held to the same accountability standards as company directors managing shareholder funds. **Civil penalties were also significantly increased.** The bill raised civil penalties for serious contraventions to $204,000 for individuals and $1,020,000 for body corporates, up from the previous maximum of $10,200 for individuals [2].
** * ** * 处罚chǔ fá chǔ fá 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 旨在zhǐ zài zhǐ zài 企业qǐ yè qǐ yè 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 相匹配xiāng pǐ pèi xiāng pǐ pèi
Federal Court Judge Anthony North had previously described the old penalties as "rather beneficially low…beneficial to wrongdoers" [2]. **The bill had broad regulatory scope.** It applied to both unions AND employer associations (approximately 100 federally registered organisations), not just unions [5].
** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 明确míng què míng què 声明shēng míng shēng míng 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 处罚chǔ fá chǔ fá "" " 违法wéi fǎ wéi fǎ 公司gōng sī gōng sī 董事dǒng shì dǒng shì suǒ suǒ 面临miàn lín miàn lín de de 处罚chǔ fá chǔ fá 一致yí zhì yí zhì "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu shì shì 管理guǎn lǐ guǎn lǐ 会员huì yuán huì yuán 资金zī jīn zī jīn de de 工会gōng huì gōng huì 官员guān yuán guān yuán 应当yīng dāng yīng dāng 管理guǎn lǐ guǎn lǐ 股东gǔ dōng gǔ dōng 资金zī jīn zī jīn de de 公司gōng sī gōng sī 董事dǒng shì dǒng shì 承担chéng dān chéng dān 同等tóng děng tóng děng de de 问责wèn zé wèn zé 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn
** * ** * 民事mín shì mín shì 处罚chǔ fá chǔ fá 大幅提高dà fú tí gāo dà fú tí gāo
** * ** * gāi gāi 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn jiāng jiāng 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 违规wéi guī wéi guī de de 民事mín shì mín shì 处罚chǔ fá chǔ fá 提高tí gāo tí gāo dào dào 个人gè rén gè rén 20.420.4 20.4 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 法人fǎ rén fǎ rén 团体tuán tǐ tuán tǐ 102102 102 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 此前cǐ qián cǐ qián de de 个人gè rén gè rén 最高zuì gāo zuì gāo 处罚chǔ fá chǔ fá 仅为jǐn wèi jǐn wèi 1.021.02 1.02 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
联邦lián bāng lián bāng 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 法官fǎ guān fǎ guān AnthonyAnthony Anthony NorthNorth North céng céng jiāng jiāng jiù jiù de de 处罚chǔ fá chǔ fá 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 形容xíng róng xíng róng wèi wèi "" " 相当xiāng dāng xiāng dāng 有利yǒu lì yǒu lì duì duì 违法者wéi fǎ zhě wéi fǎ zhě 有利yǒu lì yǒu lì "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
** * ** * gāi gāi 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn de de 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi
** * ** * 适用shì yòng shì yòng 工会gōng huì gōng huì 雇主gù zhǔ gù zhǔ 协会xié huì xié huì yuē yuē 100100 100 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 注册zhù cè zhù cè 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī ér ér 不仅仅bù jǐn jǐn bù jǐn jǐn shì shì 工会gōng huì gōng huì [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]

来源可信度评估

** * ** * 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 金融jīn róng jīn róng 评论píng lùn píng lùn AFRAFR AFR ** * ** * shì shì NineNine Nine EntertainmentEntertainment Entertainment 出版chū bǎn chū bǎn de de 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 商业shāng yè shāng yè 金融jīn róng jīn róng 报纸bào zhǐ bào zhǐ
**The Australian Financial Review (AFR)** is a mainstream Australian business and financial newspaper published by Nine Entertainment.
通常tōng cháng tōng cháng bèi bèi 视为shì wèi shì wèi 可信kě xìn kě xìn 无党派wú dǎng pài wú dǎng pài 倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng de de 来源lái yuán lái yuán 编辑biān jí biān jí 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng wèi wèi zhōng zhōng 右翼yòu yì yòu yì 专注zhuān zhù zhuān zhù 商业shāng yè shāng yè 经济jīng jì jīng jì 问题wèn tí wèn tí
It is generally regarded as a credible, non-partisan source with a center-right editorial stance focused on business and economic issues.
不是bú shì bú shì 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī huò huò 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài huà huà de de 出版物chū bǎn wù chū bǎn wù
It is not an advocacy organisation or overtly partisan publication.
虽然suī rán suī rán 无法wú fǎ wú fǎ cóng cóng 互联网hù lián wǎng hù lián wǎng 档案馆dàng àn guǎn dàng àn guǎn 检索jiǎn suǒ jiǎn suǒ dào dào 存档cún dàng cún dàng 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng dàn dàn AFRAFR AFR shì shì 一家yī jiā yī jiā 知名zhī míng zhī míng 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng duì duì 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 事务shì wù shì wù 提供tí gōng tí gōng 事实性shì shí xìng shì shí xìng 报道bào dào bào dào
While the archived article could not be retrieved from the Wayback Machine, the AFR is a reputable source that typically provides factual reporting on legislative matters.
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做过zuò guò zuò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng
**Did Labor do something similar?** **Labor opposed the bill and voted against it.** The Labor Party and Greens voted against the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Amendment Bill in 2014 [2].
** * ** *
When the bill was reintroduced in 2016, Labor continued to oppose it [6]. **Labor's position during the HSU scandal:** The HSU scandal involved prominent Labor figures, including Craig Thomson (Labor MP 2007-2013) who was later convicted of fraud charges related to his time as HSU national secretary.
** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì gāi gāi 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn bìng bìng 投票tóu piào tóu piào 否决fǒu jué fǒu jué
The scandal revealed that financial misconduct in unions was a significant issue that affected Labor's credibility [7]. **Labor's own union governance record:** During the Rudd/Gillard governments (2007-2013), the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009 was enacted, but the penalties were significantly lower.
** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 绿党lǜ dǎng lǜ dǎng 20142014 2014 nián nián 投票tóu piào tóu piào 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 20142014 2014 nián nián 公平gōng píng gōng píng 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 注册zhù cè zhù cè 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 修正xiū zhèng xiū zhèng 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
The Coalition's 2014 bill sought to strengthen this framework.
当该dāng gāi dāng gāi 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 20162016 2016 nián nián 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 提出tí chū tí chū shí shí 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 继续jì xù jì xù 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì [[ [ 66 6 ]] ]
The Bills Digest notes the bill sought to address "the foolish and bungled amendments that Labor passed in 2012" [8]. **No direct equivalent:** Labor did not introduce comparable criminal penalties for union officials during their time in government.
** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng zài zài HSUHSU HSU 丑闻chǒu wén chǒu wén 期间qī jiān qī jiān de de 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng ** * ** * HSUHSU HSU 丑闻chǒu wén chǒu wén 涉及shè jí shè jí 知名zhī míng zhī míng 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 人物rén wù rén wù 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò CraigCraig Craig ThomsonThomson Thomson 20072007 2007 -- - 20132013 2013 年任nián rèn nián rèn 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 议员yì yuán yì yuán 后来hòu lái hòu lái yīn yīn 与其yǔ qí yǔ qí 担任dān rèn dān rèn HSUHSU HSU 全国quán guó quán guó 秘书mì shū mì shū 期间qī jiān qī jiān 有关yǒu guān yǒu guān de de 欺诈qī zhà qī zhà 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng bèi bèi 定罪dìng zuì dìng zuì
Their approach relied on civil penalties and administrative oversight through Fair Work Australia.
gāi gāi 丑闻chǒu wén chǒu wén 揭示jiē shì jiē shì 工会gōng huì gōng huì zhōng zhōng de de 财务cái wù cái wù 不当bù dàng bù dàng 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi shì shì 一个yí gè yí gè 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 信誉xìn yù xìn yù de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí [[ [ 77 7 ]] ]
** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 自身zì shēn zì shēn de de 工会gōng huì gōng huì 治理zhì lǐ zhì lǐ 记录jì lù jì lù ** * ** * zài zài RuddRudd Rudd // / GillardGillard Gillard 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 期间qī jiān qī jiān 20072007 2007 -- - 20132013 2013 nián nián 20092009 2009 nián nián 公平gōng píng gōng píng 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 注册zhù cè zhù cè 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 得以dé yǐ dé yǐ 颁布bān bù bān bù dàn dàn 处罚chǔ fá chǔ fá 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn yào yào duō duō
CoalitionCoalition Coalition de de 20142014 2014 nián nián 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 旨在zhǐ zài zhǐ zài 加强jiā qiáng jiā qiáng 这一zhè yī zhè yī 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià
法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 摘要zhāi yào zhāi yào 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū gāi gāi 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 旨在zhǐ zài zhǐ zài 解决jiě jué jiě jué "" " 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng zài zài 20122012 2012 nián nián 通过tōng guò tōng guò de de 愚蠢yú chǔn yú chǔn ér ér 搞砸gǎo zá gǎo zá de de 修正案xiū zhèng àn xiū zhèng àn "" " [[ [ 88 8 ]] ]
** * ** * 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē duì duì děng děng de de 措施cuò shī cuò shī ** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng zài zài 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 期间qī jiān qī jiān 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu wèi wèi 工会gōng huì gōng huì 官员guān yuán guān yuán 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù 类似lèi sì lèi sì de de 刑事xíng shì xíng shì 处罚chǔ fá chǔ fá
他们tā men tā men de de 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ 依赖于yī lài yú yī lài yú 民事mín shì mín shì 处罚chǔ fá chǔ fá 通过tōng guò tōng guò 公平gōng píng gōng píng 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng de de 行政监督xíng zhèng jiān dū xíng zhèng jiān dū
🌐

平衡视角

** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ de de 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 依据yī jù yī jù ** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 管理guǎn lǐ guǎn lǐ 会员huì yuán huì yuán 资金zī jīn zī jīn de de 工会gōng huì gōng huì 官员guān yuán guān yuán 应当yīng dāng yīng dāng 管理guǎn lǐ guǎn lǐ 股东gǔ dōng gǔ dōng 资金zī jīn zī jīn de de 公司gōng sī gōng sī 董事dǒng shì dǒng shì 承担chéng dān chéng dān 同等tóng děng tóng děng de de 问责wèn zé wèn zé
**Legitimate government rationale:** The government argued that union officials managing member funds should face the same accountability as company directors.
PynePyne Pyne 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì "" " duì duì 滥用làn yòng làn yòng 股东gǔ dōng gǔ dōng 资金zī jīn zī jīn de de 公司gōng sī gōng sī 董事dǒng shì dǒng shì de de 处罚chǔ fá chǔ fá duì duì 滥用làn yòng làn yòng 会员huì yuán huì yuán 资金zī jīn zī jīn de de 注册zhù cè zhù cè 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 负责人fù zé rén fù zé rén de de 处罚chǔ fá chǔ fá 之间zhī jiān zhī jiān 应当yīng dāng yīng dāng yǒu yǒu 任何rèn hé rèn hé 区别qū bié qū bié "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
Minister Pyne stated: "There should be no difference between the penalties levied against a company director who misuses shareholders' funds and a registered organisations boss who misuses members' money" [2].
鉴于jiàn yú jiàn yú HSUHSU HSU 丑闻chǒu wén chǒu wén 皇家huáng jiā huáng jiā 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 揭露jiē lù jiē lù de de 其他qí tā qí tā 问题wèn tí wèn tí 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng duì duì 工会gōng huì gōng huì 治理zhì lǐ zhì lǐ 存在cún zài cún zài 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ de de 担忧dān yōu dān yōu
Given the HSU scandal and other revelations from the Royal Commission, there was legitimate public concern about union governance. **Concerns raised by unions:** Some registered organisations expressed concern that the new penalties would make it difficult to recruit people to take on official responsibilities.
** * ** * 工会gōng huì gōng huì 提出tí chū tí chū de de 担忧dān yōu dān yōu ** * ** * 一些yī xiē yī xiē 注册zhù cè zhù cè 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 担心dān xīn dān xīn xīn xīn de de 处罚chǔ fá chǔ fá jiāng jiāng 使shǐ shǐ 招募zhāo mù zhāo mù 人员rén yuán rén yuán 担任dān rèn dān rèn 官方guān fāng guān fāng 职务zhí wù zhí wù 变得biàn dé biàn dé 困难kùn nán kùn nán
The government dismissed this concern, stating: "The only people who have anything to fear are those who do the wrong thing" [2].
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 驳回bó huí bó huí le le zhè zhè 担忧dān yōu dān yōu 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì "" " 唯一wéi yī wéi yī 需要xū yào xū yào 担心dān xīn dān xīn de de rén rén shì shì 那些nà xiē nà xiē 做错事zuò cuò shì zuò cuò shì de de rén rén "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
However, the concern about volunteer recruitment in community-run organisations was genuine, particularly for small employer associations and community-based unions. **Political context:** The bill was a Coalition election commitment from 2012, predating the Royal Commission.
然而rán ér rán ér 对于duì yú duì yú 社区shè qū shè qū 运营yùn yíng yùn yíng 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 而言ér yán ér yán 关于guān yú guān yú 志愿者zhì yuàn zhě zhì yuàn zhě 招募zhāo mù zhāo mù de de 担忧dān yōu dān yōu shì shì 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 存在cún zài cún zài de de 特别tè bié tè bié shì shì 对于duì yú duì yú 小型xiǎo xíng xiǎo xíng 雇主gù zhǔ gù zhǔ 协会xié huì xié huì 社区shè qū shè qū xíng xíng 工会gōng huì gōng huì
The timing and political messaging around the bill were clearly aimed at highlighting union governance issues that affected the Labor Party.
** * ** * 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ** * ** * gāi gāi 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn shì shì CoalitionCoalition Coalition zài zài 20122012 2012 nián nián de de 选举xuǎn jǔ xuǎn jǔ 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò zǎo zǎo 皇家huáng jiā huáng jiā 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì de de 成立chéng lì chéng lì
Christopher Pyne explicitly stated: "The refusal of the Labor Party and the Greens to support the bill...is delaying the government's attempts to protect honest union members" [2]. **Broader regulatory impact:** The bill applied equally to employer associations and unions, though the political focus was predominantly on unions.
围绕wéi rào wéi rào gāi gāi 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn de de 时机shí jī shí jī 政治宣传zhèng zhì xuān chuán zhèng zhì xuān chuán 明显míng xiǎn míng xiǎn 旨在zhǐ zài zhǐ zài 突出tū chū tū chū 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng de de 工会gōng huì gōng huì 治理zhì lǐ zhì lǐ 问题wèn tí wèn tí
The establishment of the ROC created a dedicated regulator with ASIC-like powers for the union and employer association sector. **Key context:** While the penalties were severe and applied to unpaid volunteers, they were designed to match corporate accountability standards and were introduced following documented cases of serious financial misconduct in some unions.
ChristopherChristopher Christopher PynePyne Pyne 明确míng què míng què 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì "" " 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 绿党lǜ dǎng lǜ dǎng 拒绝jù jué jù jué 支持zhī chí zhī chí gāi gāi 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 正在zhèng zài zhèng zài 拖延tuō yán tuō yán 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 诚实chéng shí chéng shí 工会gōng huì gōng huì 成员chéng yuán chéng yuán de de 企图qǐ tú qǐ tú "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
The Labor Party's opposition to the bill, while principled from a labor movement perspective, also protected organisations that had been associated with Labor figures involved in misconduct.
** * ** * gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn de de 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng ** * ** * gāi gāi 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 平等píng děng píng děng 适用shì yòng shì yòng 雇主gù zhǔ gù zhǔ 协会xié huì xié huì 工会gōng huì gōng huì 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 焦点jiāo diǎn jiāo diǎn 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 集中jí zhōng jí zhōng zài zài 工会gōng huì gōng huì 身上shēn shàng shēn shàng
ROCROC ROC de de 设立shè lì shè lì wèi wèi gāi gāi 工会gōng huì gōng huì 雇主gù zhǔ gù zhǔ 协会xié huì xié huì 部门bù mén bù mén 创建chuàng jiàn chuàng jiàn le le 一个yí gè yí gè 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 类似lèi sì lèi sì ASICASIC ASIC 权力quán lì quán lì de de 专门zhuān mén zhuān mén 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 机构jī gòu jī gòu
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ** * ** * 虽然suī rán suī rán 处罚chǔ fá chǔ fá 严厉yán lì yán lì qiě qiě 适用shì yòng shì yòng 无薪wú xīn wú xīn 志愿者zhì yuàn zhě zhì yuàn zhě dàn dàn 它们tā men tā men 旨在zhǐ zài zhǐ zài 企业qǐ yè qǐ yè 问责wèn zé wèn zé 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 相匹配xiāng pǐ pèi xiāng pǐ pèi 并且bìng qiě bìng qiě shì shì zài zài 一些yī xiē yī xiē yǒu yǒu 工会gōng huì gōng huì 涉及shè jí shè jí 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 财务cái wù cái wù 不当bù dàng bù dàng 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi de de 记录在案jì lù zài àn jì lù zài àn 案件àn jiàn àn jiàn 发生fā shēng fā shēng hòu hòu 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù de de
工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng duì duì gāi gāi 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn de de 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 虽然suī rán suī rán cóng cóng 劳工láo gōng láo gōng 运动yùn dòng yùn dòng de de 角度jiǎo dù jiǎo dù 来看lái kàn lái kàn 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 原则性yuán zé xìng yuán zé xìng dàn dàn 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù le le 涉及shè jí shè jí 不当bù dàng bù dàng 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi de de 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 人物rén wù rén wù yǒu yǒu 关联guān lián guān lián de de 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī

属实

6.0

/ 10

核心hé xīn hé xīn 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng zài zài 事实shì shí shì shí 层面céng miàn céng miàn shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què de de
The core claim is factually accurate.
CoalitionCoalition Coalition 确实què shí què shí 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù le le 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 20142014 2014 nián nián 公平gōng píng gōng píng 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 注册zhù cè zhù cè 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 修正xiū zhèng xiū zhèng 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn duì duì 注册zhù cè zhù cè 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 官员guān yuán guān yuán 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 违反wéi fǎn wéi fǎn 职责zhí zé zhí zé de de 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi 设立shè lì shè lì le le 最高zuì gāo zuì gāo 3434 34 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán // / huò huò 55 5 nián nián 监禁jiān jìn jiān jìn de de 刑事xíng shì xíng shì 处罚chǔ fá chǔ fá 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 处罚chǔ fá chǔ fá 适用shì yòng shì yòng 无薪wú xīn wú xīn 民选mín xuǎn mín xuǎn 官员guān yuán guān yuán [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
The Coalition did introduce legislation (Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Amendment Bill 2014) that established criminal penalties of up to $340,000 and/or 5 years imprisonment for serious breaches of officers' duties in registered organisations, and these penalties applied to unpaid elected officials [1][2].
然而rán ér rán ér gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 忽略hū lüè hū lüè le le 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 11 1 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 处罚chǔ fá chǔ fá 旨在zhǐ zài zhǐ zài 公司gōng sī gōng sī 董事dǒng shì dǒng shì 问责wèn zé wèn zé 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 相匹配xiāng pǐ pèi xiāng pǐ pèi 22 2 它们tā men tā men shì shì zài zài HSUHSU HSU 丑闻chǒu wén chǒu wén 皇家huáng jiā huáng jiā 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 揭露jiē lù jiē lù 一些yī xiē yī xiē 工会gōng huì gōng huì 存在cún zài cún zài 财务cái wù cái wù 不当bù dàng bù dàng 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi 之后zhī hòu zhī hòu 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù de de 33 3 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 自身zì shēn zì shēn 议员yì yuán yì yuán 牵涉qiān shè qiān shè 工会gōng huì gōng huì 治理zhì lǐ zhì lǐ 失职shī zhí shī zhí 问题wèn tí wèn tí 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng réng réng 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì gāi gāi 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 44 4 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 处罚chǔ fá chǔ fá 适用shì yòng shì yòng 工会gōng huì gōng huì 雇主gù zhǔ gù zhǔ 协会xié huì xié huì ér ér 不仅仅bù jǐn jǐn bù jǐn jǐn shì shì 工会gōng huì gōng huì 官员guān yuán guān yuán
However, the claim omits crucial context: (1) these penalties were designed to match corporate director accountability standards; (2) they were introduced following the HSU scandal and Royal Commission revelations of financial misconduct in some unions; (3) Labor opposed the bill despite their own MPs being implicated in union governance failures; and (4) the penalties applied to both unions AND employer associations, not just union officials.

📚 来源与引用 (8)

  1. 1
    aph.gov.au

    aph.gov.au

    Helpful information Text of bill First reading: Text of the bill as introduced into the Parliament Third reading: Prepared if the bill is amended by the house in which it was introduced. This version of the bill is then considered by the second house. As passed by

    Aph Gov
  2. 2
    openaustralia.org.au

    openaustralia.org.au

    Making parliament easy.

    Openaustralia Org
  3. 3
    aph.gov.au

    aph.gov.au

    Aph Gov

    Original link no longer available
  4. 4
    royalcommission.gov.au

    royalcommission.gov.au

    Royalcommission Gov

  5. 5
    lexology.com

    lexology.com

    On 22 November, the Turnbull Government finally secured passage of the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Bill 2014 (RO Bill) by Federal Parliament…

    Lexology
  6. 6
    theyvoteforyou.org.au

    theyvoteforyou.org.au

    Division: Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Amendment Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Agree to bill's main idea

    They Vote For You
  7. 7
    abc.net.au

    abc.net.au

    Claims of sex, corruption and intrigue surrounding the Health Services Union have haunted the Federal Government for three years.

    Abc Net
  8. 8
    openaustralia.org.au

    openaustralia.org.au

    Making parliament easy.

    Openaustralia Org

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。