* * * * 该 gāi 主张 zhǔ zhāng 在 zài 事实上 shì shí shàng 是 shì 准确 zhǔn què 的 de 。 。
**The claim is factually accurate.** The Abbott government did abandon its commitment to return the budget to surplus by 2016-17.
* * * * Abbott Abbott 政府 zhèng fǔ 确实 què shí 放弃 fàng qì 了 le 在 zài 2016 2016 - - 17 17 年 nián 实现 shí xiàn 预算 yù suàn 盈余 yíng yú 的 de 承诺 chéng nuò 。 。
In December 2013, just three months after being elected, Prime Minister Tony Abbott confirmed that a 2016-17 surplus was no longer realistic, stating: "We said we would return the budget back to surplus at least as quickly as Labor had proposed.
2013 2013 年 nián 12 12 月 yuè , , 即 jí 当选 dāng xuǎn 仅 jǐn 三个 sān gè 月 yuè 后 hòu , , 总理 zǒng lǐ Tony Tony Abbott Abbott 确认 què rèn 2016 2016 - - 17 17 年 nián 的 de 盈余 yíng yú 已 yǐ 不再 bù zài 现实 xiàn shí , , 他 tā 表示 biǎo shì : : " " 我们 wǒ men 说 shuō 过 guò 我们 wǒ men 会 huì 至少 zhì shǎo 以 yǐ Labor Labor 提出 tí chū 的 de 同样 tóng yàng 速度 sù dù 恢复 huī fù 预算 yù suàn 盈余 yíng yú 。 。
What we are discovering the more we dive deeply into the budget is the extent of Labor's fiscal disaster" [1].
In late October 2013, Abbott stated: "We will get back to surplus at least as quickly as the former government claimed that it would get back to surplus" [1].
The government's first Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook (MYEFO) in December 2013 forecast a deficit of approximately $50 billion for 2013-14 and projected debt to exceed $500 billion beyond the four-year budget forecasts [1].
According to ABC Fact Check, net debt doubled under the Coalition Government from $174.6 billion in September 2013 to $354.5 billion by October 2018 [2].
该 gāi 主张 zhǔ zhāng 遗漏 yí lòu 了 le 几个 jǐ gè 关键 guān jiàn 背景 bèi jǐng 因素 yīn sù : :
The claim omits several critical contextual factors:
**Economic circumstances beyond government control:** The Abbott government pointed to falling commodity prices as a major factor in the deteriorating budget position.
Iron ore prices fell from $US120 a tonne at the beginning of 2014 to around $US60 a tonne by December 2014, with Treasury forecasting this would wipe $6.2 billion from tax receipts that year and almost $32 billion over the following four years [4].
**Structural deficit inherited:** Independent economists noted that Australia faced a structural deficit problem that predated the Coalition government.
BetaShares chief economist David Bassanese argued that weak economic growth and structural decline in tax revenues relative to GDP were largely responsible for the lingering red ink, not just commodity prices [4].
**Senate obstruction:** The Coalition's 2014 budget savings measures were largely blocked in the Senate by the Opposition.
Former Treasury official Stephen Anthony noted that MYEFO included almost $34 billion in budget savings that had not yet passed the Senate [4].
**Global economic trends:** AMP Chief Economist Shane Oliver noted that "global economic trends, commodity price swings, and other factors completely out of government's control are what drives the debt" [2].
**Did Labor do something similar?**
**Yes - Labor also failed to deliver promised surpluses.**
The Rudd/Gillard government made multiple surplus promises that were subsequently abandoned:
1. **2012-13 surplus promise:** Treasurer Wayne Swan promised a surplus for 2012-13 "come hell or high water" and even prematurely announced it had been "delivered" after the May 2012 budget [5].
The predicted surplus of $2.5 billion became a deficit of $18.8 billion [5].
2. **Corporate revenue collapse:** According to the 2012-13 Final Budget Outcome, the surplus was killed by falling corporate tax revenue and the underperforming Minerals Resource Rent Tax (MRRT).
* * * *
Company tax revenue fell from an estimated $75 billion to $68.2 billion, while the MRRT and Petroleum Resource Rent Tax yielded only $1.9 billion against predictions of $7.4 billion [5].
3. **Fiscal record:** The Labor government (2007-2013) ran deficits every year following the Global Financial Crisis, despite initial commitments to return to surplus.
The Coalition inherited a budget in deficit with PEFO (Pre-Election Fiscal Outlook) forecasting a $30 billion deficit for 2013-14 [1].
**Historical context:** Australia has not achieved a federal budget surplus since the Howard government (1996-2007).
Both Labor (2007-2013) and the Coalition (2013-2022) failed to deliver surpluses during their respective terms, despite making election promises to do so.
While the claim that the Coalition broke its surplus promise is factually accurate, important context explains why this occurred and demonstrates that this failure was not unique to the Coalition:
**Legitimate factors affecting the Coalition's ability to deliver a surplus:**
- Collapsing commodity prices significantly reduced government revenue [4]
- Senate obstruction blocked key savings measures [2]
- Weak economic growth and structural deficits in tax revenue relative to GDP [4]
- The Coalition maintained its longer-term goal of achieving surpluses equivalent to 1% of GDP within a decade, though this was also never achieved [1]
**Comparative analysis:**
The Coalition's failure to deliver a surplus mirrors Labor's earlier failure to deliver its promised 2012-13 surplus.
Both made optimistic surplus promises during election campaigns that proved unattainable.
**Expert assessment:**
RMIT ABC Fact Check found that while net debt did double under the Coalition, "this is not the only way to track net debt." Measured as a share of GDP, net debt grew more slowly.
- - 疲软 pí ruǎn 的 de 经济 jīng jì 增长 zēng zhǎng 以及 yǐ jí 税收收入 shuì shōu shōu rù 相对 xiāng duì 于 yú GDP GDP 的 de 结构性 jié gòu xìng 赤字 chì zì [ [ 4 4 ] ]
Additionally, experts noted that "paying down debt wasn't entirely within the control of government, with broader economic circumstances also playing a significant part" [2].
**Key context:** This is NOT unique to the Coalition.
- - Coalition Coalition 维持 wéi chí 了 le 在 zài 十年 shí nián 内 nèi 实现 shí xiàn 相当于 xiāng dāng yú GDP GDP 1% 1% 的 de 盈余 yíng yú 的 de 长期 cháng qī 目标 mù biāo , , 尽管 jǐn guǎn 这一 zhè yī 目标 mù biāo 也 yě 从未 cóng wèi 实现 shí xiàn [ [ 1 1 ] ]
Both major parties have made and broken surplus promises over the past 15+ years.
* * * * 比较 bǐ jiào 分析 fēn xī : : * * * *
Neither government has achieved a budget surplus since the Howard government era (2007), despite repeated promises from both sides.
Tony Abbott explicitly abandoned this commitment in December 2013, just three months after being elected, and the Coalition never achieved a surplus during its two terms in office (2013-2022).
However, the claim lacks important context about external economic factors (falling commodity prices, weak global growth) and the fact that this failure was not unique to the Coalition - the preceding Labor government similarly failed to deliver its promised 2012-13 surplus, and Australia has not recorded a federal budget surplus since the Howard government ended in 2007.
Tony Abbott explicitly abandoned this commitment in December 2013, just three months after being elected, and the Coalition never achieved a surplus during its two terms in office (2013-2022).
However, the claim lacks important context about external economic factors (falling commodity prices, weak global growth) and the fact that this failure was not unique to the Coalition - the preceding Labor government similarly failed to deliver its promised 2012-13 surplus, and Australia has not recorded a federal budget surplus since the Howard government ended in 2007.