具有误导性

评分： 4.0/10

报告问题
Coalition
C0924

声明内容

“重写了学校课程，使其更加右翼。之前的课程经过多年开发，经过广泛咨询。新课程由两个人编写。其中一人认为'土著'是'人类垃圾堆'，称一名性侵受害者为'没用的荡妇'，并感叹澳大利亚有太多'穆si林'和'中国佬'。另一人则质疑移民和女性是否处于不利地位，并暗示同性恋是'不自然的'。”
腐败 伦理 青年
原始来源： Matthew Davis
分析时间： 3 Feb 2026

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

** * ** * 核心hé xīn hé xīn 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng ：： ： 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng "" " 重写zhòng xiě zhòng xiě 了le le 学校xué xiào xué xiào 课程kè chéng kè chéng ，， ， 使shǐ shǐ 其qí qí 更加gèng jiā gèng jiā 右翼yòu yì yòu yì "" " ** * ** *
**Core Claim: The Coalition "rewrote the school curriculum to make it more right wing"** The claim contains significant factual errors and conflations regarding the 2014 Australian Curriculum Review. **The review structure was NOT "two people" writing the curriculum:** The curriculum review announced by Education Minister Christopher Pyne in January 2014 was led by two principal reviewers - Professor Ken Wiltshire AO and Dr Kevin Donnelly - who oversaw the process [1].
 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 在zài zài 20142014 2014 年nián nián 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 课程kè chéng kè chéng 审查shěn chá shěn chá 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 存在cún zài cún zài 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 事实shì shí shì shí 错误cuò wù cuò wù 和hé hé 混淆hùn xiáo hùn xiáo 。。 。
However, they were supported by **15 subject specialist experts** (not "two people") who provided detailed input on specific curriculum areas [2].
 ** * ** * 审查shěn chá shěn chá 结构jié gòu jié gòu 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi "" " 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 人rén rén "" " 编写biān xiě biān xiě 课程kè chéng kè chéng ：： ： ** * ** *
These subject experts included academics from various universities reviewing specific disciplines like English, mathematics, science, and history. **The racist comments were NOT made by either of the two principal reviewers:** The inflammatory comments referenced in the claim - including "abos," "human rubbish tips," "mussies," "chinky-poos," and calling a sexual assault victim a "worthless slut" - were made by **Professor Barry Spurr**, a University of Sydney poetry professor who was one of the 15 subject specialist consultants (specifically reviewing English curriculum), NOT by either of the two principal reviewers (Donnelly or Wiltshire) [3][4].
 教育部长jiào yù bù zhǎng jiào yù bù zhǎng ChristopherChristopher Christopher PynePyne Pyne 于yú yú 20142014 2014 年nián nián 11 1 月yuè yuè 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 的de de 课程kè chéng kè chéng 审查shěn chá shěn chá 由yóu yóu 两位liǎng wèi liǎng wèi 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 评审píng shěn píng shěn 人rén rén 领导lǐng dǎo lǐng dǎo —— — —— — KenKen Ken WiltshireWiltshire Wiltshire AOAO AO 教授jiào shòu jiào shòu 和hé hé KevinKevin Kevin DonnellyDonnelly Donnelly 博士bó shì bó shì —— — —— — 他们tā men tā men 监督jiān dū jiān dū 了le le 整个zhěng gè zhěng gè 流程liú chéng liú chéng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
Spurr was suspended from academic duties after emails containing these remarks were leaked by New Matilda in October 2014 [3].
 然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， 他们tā men tā men 得到dé dào dé dào 了le le ** * ** * 1515 15 名míng míng 学科xué kē xué kē 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā ** * ** * （（ （ 而ér ér 非fēi fēi "" " 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 人rén rén "" " ）） ） 的de de 支持zhī chí zhī chí ，， ， 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 为wèi wèi 特定tè dìng tè dìng 课程kè chéng kè chéng 领域lǐng yù lǐng yù 提供tí gōng tí gōng 了le le 详细xiáng xì xiáng xì 意见yì jiàn yì jiàn [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
Spurr claimed the emails were part of a "whimsical linguistic game" and "mock-shocking repartee" not reflective of his actual views [4]. **The "unnatural" homosexuality comment was made by Donnelly, but the claim misattributes other comments:** Kevin Donnelly did write in his 2004 book "Why Our Schools Are Failing" that "many parents would consider the sexual practices of gays, lesbians and transgender individuals decidedly unnatural" [5].
 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 学科xué kē xué kē 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 来自lái zì lái zì 各gè gè 大学dà xué dà xué 的de de 学者xué zhě xué zhě ，， ， 负责fù zé fù zé 审查shěn chá shěn chá 英语yīng yǔ yīng yǔ 、、 、 数学shù xué shù xué 、、 、 科学kē xué kē xué 和hé hé 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ 等děng děng 特定tè dìng tè dìng 学科xué kē xué kē 。。 。
However, Donnelly did NOT make the racist comments attributed to "one" of the two people in the claim - those were Spurr's. **No evidence found for Wiltshire comments:** Research did not substantiate the claim that Ken Wiltshire "questioned whether migrants and women are disadvantaged." No credible sources were found attributing these specific views to Wiltshire.
 ** * ** * 种族主义zhǒng zú zhǔ yì zhǒng zú zhǔ yì 言论yán lùn yán lùn 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 由yóu yóu 两位liǎng wèi liǎng wèi 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 评审píng shěn píng shěn 人中rén zhōng rén zhōng 的de de 任何rèn hé rèn hé 一位yī wèi yī wèi 发表fā biǎo fā biǎo ：： ： ** * ** *
该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 中zhōng zhōng 提到tí dào tí dào 的de de 煽动性shān dòng xìng shān dòng xìng 言论yán lùn yán lùn —— — —— — 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò "" " 土著tǔ zhù tǔ zhù "" " 、、 、 "" " 人类rén lèi rén lèi 垃圾堆lā jī duī lā jī duī "" " 、、 、 "" " 穆mù mù sisi si 林lín lín "" " 、、 、 "" " 中国zhōng guó zhōng guó 佬lǎo lǎo "" " 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 称性chēng xìng chēng xìng 侵qīn qīn 受害者shòu hài zhě shòu hài zhě 为wèi wèi "" " 没用méi yòng méi yòng 的de de 荡妇dàng fù dàng fù "" " —— — —— — 是shì shì 由yóu yóu ** * ** * BarryBarry Barry SpurrSpurr Spurr 教授jiào shòu jiào shòu ** * ** * 发表fā biǎo fā biǎo 的de de ，， ， 他tā tā 是shì shì 悉尼大学xī ní dà xué xī ní dà xué 的de de 一位yī wèi yī wèi 诗歌shī gē shī gē 教授jiào shòu jiào shòu ，， ， 曾céng céng 是shì shì 1515 15 名míng míng 学科xué kē xué kē 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 顾问gù wèn gù wèn 之一zhī yī zhī yī （（ （ 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 负责fù zé fù zé 审查shěn chá shěn chá 英语课程yīng yǔ kè chéng yīng yǔ kè chéng ）） ） ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 两位liǎng wèi liǎng wèi 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 评审píng shěn píng shěn 人rén rén （（ （ DonnellyDonnelly Donnelly 或huò huò WiltshireWiltshire Wiltshire ）） ） 中zhōng zhōng 的de de 任何rèn hé rèn hé 一位yī wèi yī wèi [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
在zài zài NewNew New MatildaMatilda Matilda 于yú yú 20142014 2014 年nián nián 1010 10 月yuè yuè 泄露xiè lòu xiè lòu 了le le 包含bāo hán bāo hán 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 言论yán lùn yán lùn 的de de 电子邮件diàn zi yóu jiàn diàn zi yóu jiàn 后hòu hòu ，， ， SpurrSpurr Spurr 被bèi bèi 暂停zàn tíng zàn tíng 了le le 学术xué shù xué shù 职务zhí wù zhí wù [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
SpurrSpurr Spurr 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 电子邮件diàn zi yóu jiàn diàn zi yóu jiàn 只是zhǐ shì zhǐ shì "" " 异想天开yì xiǎng tiān kāi yì xiǎng tiān kāi 的de de 语言yǔ yán yǔ yán 游戏yóu xì yóu xì "" " 和hé hé "" " 假装jiǎ zhuāng jiǎ zhuāng 震惊zhèn jīng zhèn jīng 的de de 俏皮话qiào pí huà qiào pí huà "" " ，， ， 并bìng bìng 不能bù néng bù néng 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 他tā tā 的de de 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 关于guān yú guān yú 同性恋tóng xìng liàn tóng xìng liàn "" " 不bù bù 自然zì rán zì rán "" " 的de de 评论píng lùn píng lùn 确实què shí què shí 由yóu yóu DonnellyDonnelly Donnelly 发表fā biǎo fā biǎo ，， ， 但dàn dàn 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 错误cuò wù cuò wù 地dì dì 将jiāng jiāng 其他qí tā qí tā 言论yán lùn yán lùn 归于guī yú guī yú 他tā tā ：： ： ** * ** *
KevinKevin Kevin DonnellyDonnelly Donnelly 确实què shí què shí 在zài zài 他tā tā 20042004 2004 年nián nián 的de de 著作zhù zuò zhù zuò 《《 《 WhyWhy Why OurOur Our SchoolsSchools Schools AreAre Are FailingFailing Failing 》》 》 中zhōng zhōng 写道xiě dào xiě dào ：： ： "" " 许多xǔ duō xǔ duō 父母fù mǔ fù mǔ 会huì huì 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 同性恋tóng xìng liàn tóng xìng liàn 、、 、 双性恋shuāng xìng liàn shuāng xìng liàn 和hé hé 跨kuà kuà 性别xìng bié xìng bié 者zhě zhě 的de de 性行为xìng xíng wèi xìng xíng wèi 明显míng xiǎn míng xiǎn 是shì shì 不bù bù 自然zì rán zì rán 的de de "" " [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， DonnellyDonnelly Donnelly 并bìng bìng 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 发表fā biǎo fā biǎo 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 归咎于guī jiù yú guī jiù yú "" " 两人liǎng rén liǎng rén 中zhōng zhōng 一人yī rén yī rén "" " 的de de 种族主义zhǒng zú zhǔ yì zhǒng zú zhǔ yì 言论yán lùn yán lùn —— — —— — 那些nà xiē nà xiē 是shì shì SpurrSpurr Spurr 的de de 言论yán lùn yán lùn 。。 。
** * ** * 未找到wèi zhǎo dào wèi zhǎo dào WiltshireWiltshire Wiltshire 相关xiāng guān xiāng guān 言论yán lùn yán lùn 的de de 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù ：： ： ** * ** *
研究yán jiū yán jiū 未能wèi néng wèi néng 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 所称suǒ chēng suǒ chēng 的de de KenKen Ken WiltshireWiltshire Wiltshire "" " 质疑zhì yí zhì yí 移民yí mín yí mín 和hé hé 女性nǚ xìng nǚ xìng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 处于chǔ yú chǔ yú 不利bù lì bù lì 地位dì wèi dì wèi "" " 。。 。
没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 可靠kě kào kě kào 的de de 来源lái yuán lái yuán 将jiāng jiāng 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn 归于guī yú guī yú WiltshireWiltshire Wiltshire 。。 。

缺失背景

** * ** * 审查shěn chá shěn chá 是shì shì 一次yī cì yī cì 审查shěn chá shěn chá ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 单方面dān fāng miàn dān fāng miàn 重写zhòng xiě zhòng xiě ：： ： ** * ** *
**The review was a review, not a unilateral rewrite:** The 2014 Review of the Australian Curriculum was commissioned to evaluate the existing curriculum, not to unilaterally rewrite it [6].
 20142014 2014 年nián nián 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 课程kè chéng kè chéng 审查shěn chá shěn chá 的de de 目的mù dì mù dì 是shì shì 评估píng gū píng gū 现有xiàn yǒu xiàn yǒu 课程kè chéng kè chéng ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 单方面dān fāng miàn dān fāng miàn 重写zhòng xiě zhòng xiě [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
The final report made recommendations to Education Minister Pyne, who then needed to negotiate with state and territory governments for implementation.
 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 报告bào gào bào gào 向xiàng xiàng 教育部长jiào yù bù zhǎng jiào yù bù zhǎng PynePyne Pyne 提出tí chū tí chū 了le le 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì ，， ， 然后rán hòu rán hòu 他tā tā 需要xū yào xū yào 与yǔ yǔ 各州gè zhōu gè zhōu 和hé hé 领地lǐng dì lǐng dì 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 协商xié shāng xié shāng 实施shí shī shí shī 。。 。
Education in Australia is a state/territory responsibility under the Constitution - the federal government cannot unilaterally impose curriculum changes. **The consultation claim cuts both ways:** The claim states the "previous curriculum was developed over many years with extensive consultation." This is accurate - ACARA notes the curriculum "considered thousands of opinions - from teachers, academics and parents to business, industry and community groups" during its development from 2008-2013 under Labor [7].
 在zài zài 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà ，， ， 教育jiào yù jiào yù 根据gēn jù gēn jù 宪法xiàn fǎ xiàn fǎ 是shì shì 州zhōu zhōu // / 领地lǐng dì lǐng dì 的de de 责任zé rèn zé rèn —— — —— — 联邦政府lián bāng zhèng fǔ lián bāng zhèng fǔ 不能bù néng bù néng 单方面dān fāng miàn dān fāng miàn 强制qiáng zhì qiáng zhì 推行tuī xíng tuī xíng 课程kè chéng kè chéng 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 。。 。
However, the 2014 Coalition review also conducted consultation, including accepting public submissions and consulting with state and territory governments [8].
 ** * ** * 关于guān yú guān yú 咨询zī xún zī xún 的de de 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 两面性liǎng miàn xìng liǎng miàn xìng ：： ： ** * ** *
The claim omits that both processes involved consultation. **The review was released before full implementation:** The claim implies the curriculum was being "rewritten" after completion.
 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 称chēng chēng "" " 之前zhī qián zhī qián 的de de 课程kè chéng kè chéng 经过jīng guò jīng guò 多年duō nián duō nián 开发kāi fā kāi fā ，， ， 经过jīng guò jīng guò 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 咨询zī xún zī xún "" " 。。 。
However, the review was conducted in 2014 before the national curriculum had been fully implemented in all states and territories [1].
 这是zhè shì zhè shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de —— — —— — ACARAACARA ACARA 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū ，， ， 该gāi gāi 课程kè chéng kè chéng 在zài zài 20082008 2008 -- - 20132013 2013 年nián nián 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 期间qī jiān qī jiān 开发kāi fā kāi fā 时shí shí "" " 考虑kǎo lǜ kǎo lǜ 了le le 数千条shù qiān tiáo shù qiān tiáo 意见yì jiàn yì jiàn —— — —— — 来自lái zì lái zì 教师jiào shī jiào shī 、、 、 学者xué zhě xué zhě 和hé hé 家长jiā zhǎng jiā zhǎng ，， ， 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 商界shāng jiè shāng jiè 、、 、 行业háng yè háng yè 和hé hé 社区shè qū shè qū 团体tuán tǐ tuán tǐ "" " [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。 。
The curriculum was still in the rollout phase, making the timing of the review premature according to teacher and parent groups, rather than evidence of destroying a completed product. **Pyne's stated rationale for the review:** Minister Pyne argued the review was necessary because student performance in literacy, numeracy, mathematics and science had been "declining or flatlining" and the curriculum was overly prescriptive - described as a "telephone book" compared to 15-20 page curricula in higher-performing countries like Singapore or Finland [8].
 然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， 20142014 2014 年nián nián 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 的de de 审查shěn chá shěn chá 也yě yě 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 了le le 咨询zī xún zī xún ，， ， 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 接受jiē shòu jiē shòu 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng 提交tí jiāo tí jiāo 的de de 意见yì jiàn yì jiàn 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 与yǔ yǔ 各州gè zhōu gè zhōu 和hé hé 领地lǐng dì lǐng dì 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 协商xié shāng xié shāng [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。 。
该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 忽略hū lüè hū lüè 了le le 这zhè zhè 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 过程guò chéng guò chéng 都dōu dōu 涉及shè jí shè jí 咨询zī xún zī xún 。。 。
** * ** * 审查shěn chá shěn chá 是shì shì 在zài zài 全面实施quán miàn shí shī quán miàn shí shī 之前zhī qián zhī qián 发布fā bù fā bù 的de de ：： ： ** * ** *
该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 暗示àn shì àn shì 课程kè chéng kè chéng 在zài zài 完成wán chéng wán chéng 后hòu hòu 正在zhèng zài zhèng zài 被bèi bèi "" " 重写zhòng xiě zhòng xiě "" " 。。 。
然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， 审查shěn chá shěn chá 是shì shì 在zài zài 20142014 2014 年nián nián 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 的de de ，， ， 当时dāng shí dāng shí 国家guó jiā guó jiā 课程kè chéng kè chéng 尚未shàng wèi shàng wèi 在zài zài 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 州zhōu zhōu 和hé hé 领地lǐng dì lǐng dì 完全wán quán wán quán 实施shí shī shí shī [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
课程kè chéng kè chéng 仍réng réng 处于chǔ yú chǔ yú 推广tuī guǎng tuī guǎng 阶段jiē duàn jiē duàn ，， ， 这zhè zhè 使得shǐ de shǐ de 审查shěn chá shěn chá 的de de 时机shí jī shí jī 被bèi bèi 教师jiào shī jiào shī 和hé hé 家长jiā zhǎng jiā zhǎng 团体tuán tǐ tuán tǐ 批评pī píng pī píng 为wèi wèi 过早guò zǎo guò zǎo ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 摧毁cuī huǐ cuī huǐ 已yǐ yǐ 完成wán chéng wán chéng 产品chǎn pǐn chǎn pǐn 的de de 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 。。 。
** * ** * PynePyne Pyne 启动qǐ dòng qǐ dòng 审查shěn chá shěn chá 的de de 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu ：： ： ** * ** *
PynePyne Pyne 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 辩称biàn chēng biàn chēng ，， ， 审查shěn chá shěn chá 是shì shì 必要bì yào bì yào 的de de ，， ， 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi 识字shí zì shí zì 、、 、 算术suàn shù suàn shù 、、 、 数学shù xué shù xué 和hé hé 科学kē xué kē xué 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 的de de 学生xué shēng xué shēng 成绩chéng jì chéng jì "" " 一直yì zhí yì zhí 在zài zài 下降xià jiàng xià jiàng 或huò huò 停滞不前tíng zhì bù qián tíng zhì bù qián "" " ，， ， 而且ér qiě ér qiě 课程kè chéng kè chéng 过于guò yú guò yú 繁琐fán suǒ fán suǒ —— — —— — 被bèi bèi 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为wèi wèi "" " 电话簿diàn huà bù diàn huà bù "" " ，， ， 而ér ér 新加坡xīn jiā pō xīn jiā pō 或huò huò 芬兰fēn lán fēn lán 等děng děng 成绩chéng jì chéng jì 更gèng gèng 高gāo gāo 的de de 国家guó jiā guó jiā 的de de 课程kè chéng kè chéng 只有zhǐ yǒu zhǐ yǒu 1515 15 -- - 2020 20 页yè yè [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。 。

来源可信度评估

** * ** * 提供tí gōng tí gōng 的de de 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán ：： ： ** * ** *
**The original sources provided:** 1. **Star Observer** - An LGBTQ+ community newspaper.
 11 1 .. . ** * ** * StarStar Star ObserverObserver Observer ** * ** * —— — —— — 一家yī jiā yī jiā LGBTQLGBTQ LGBTQ ++ + 社区shè qū shè qū 报纸bào zhǐ bào zhǐ 。。 。
The article raises legitimate concerns from LGBTQ+ groups about the curriculum review, but represents community advocacy perspectives rather than neutral reporting. 2. **The Guardian Australia** - A mainstream news outlet with center-left editorial stance.
 该gāi gāi 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 提出tí chū tí chū 了le le LGBTQLGBTQ LGBTQ ++ + 团体tuán tǐ tuán tǐ 对duì duì 课程kè chéng kè chéng 审查shěn chá shěn chá 的de de 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 担忧dān yōu dān yōu ，， ， 但dàn dàn 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 的de de 是shì shì 社区shè qū shè qū 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 视角shì jiǎo shì jiǎo 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 中立zhōng lì zhōng lì 报道bào dào bào dào 。。 。
Generally credible for factual reporting, though coverage of this issue was critical of the Coalition government. 3. **The AIMN (Australian Independent Media Network)** - A progressive/alternative media site.
 22 2 .. . ** * ** * TheThe The GuardianGuardian Guardian AustraliaAustralia Australia ** * ** * —— — —— — 一家yī jiā yī jiā 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 中zhōng zhōng 左翼zuǒ yì zuǒ yì 编辑biān jí biān jí 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 的de de 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 机构jī gòu jī gòu 。。 。
The article appears partisan, framing the review as "rewriting history" and using the loaded term "propaganda." **New Matilda's role:** The source that published the Spurr emails (New Matilda) is an independent progressive outlet.
 一般来说yì bān lái shuō yì bān lái shuō 事实shì shí shì shí 报道bào dào bào dào 可信kě xìn kě xìn ，， ， 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 对duì duì 这zhè zhè 一yī yī 问题wèn tí wèn tí 的de de 报道bào dào bào dào 对duì duì 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 持chí chí 批评pī píng pī píng 态度tài dù tài dù 。。 。
While the emails were authenticated by University of Sydney sources, the publication came from a clearly partisan source [4].
 33 3 .. . ** * ** * TheThe The AIMNAIMN AIMN （（ （ AustralianAustralian Australian IndependentIndependent Independent MediaMedia Media NetworkNetwork Network ）） ） ** * ** * —— — —— — 一家yī jiā yī jiā 进步jìn bù jìn bù // / 另类lìng lèi lìng lèi 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 网站wǎng zhàn wǎng zhàn 。。 。
该gāi gāi 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 似乎sì hū sì hū 带有dài yǒu dài yǒu 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 色彩sè cǎi sè cǎi ，， ， 将jiāng jiāng 审查shěn chá shěn chá 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 为wèi wèi "" " 重写zhòng xiě zhòng xiě 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ "" " ，， ， 并bìng bìng 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng "" " 宣传xuān chuán xuān chuán "" " 这zhè zhè 一带yī dài yī dài 有yǒu yǒu 倾向性qīng xiàng xìng qīng xiàng xìng 的de de 词汇cí huì cí huì 。。 。
** * ** * NewNew New MatildaMatilda Matilda 的de de 作用zuò yòng zuò yòng ：： ： ** * ** *
发布fā bù fā bù SpurrSpurr Spurr 电子邮件diàn zi yóu jiàn diàn zi yóu jiàn 的de de 来源lái yuán lái yuán （（ （ NewNew New MatildaMatilda Matilda ）） ） 是shì shì 一家yī jiā yī jiā 独立dú lì dú lì 的de de 进步jìn bù jìn bù 派pài pài 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 。。 。
虽然suī rán suī rán 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 电子邮件diàn zi yóu jiàn diàn zi yóu jiàn 经jīng jīng 悉尼大学xī ní dà xué xī ní dà xué 的de de 消息来源xiāo xī lái yuán xiāo xī lái yuán 认证rèn zhèng rèn zhèng ，， ， 但dàn dàn 发布fā bù fā bù 来自lái zì lái zì 一个yí gè yí gè 明显míng xiǎn míng xiǎn 带有dài yǒu dài yǒu 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 色彩sè cǎi sè cǎi 的de de 来源lái yuán lái yuán [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 以yǐ yǐ 不同bù tóng bù tóng 方式fāng shì fāng shì 开发kāi fā kāi fā 课程kè chéng kè chéng ？？ ？
**Did Labor develop curriculum differently?** The Australian Curriculum was initiated under the Rudd-Gillard Labor government (2008-2013) following the 2007 election [7].
 ** * ** *
The development process: - Was led by ACARA, a statutory authority created by the Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority Act 2008 [9] - Involved extensive consultation with thousands of stakeholders [7] - Required state and territory agreement (as education is constitutionally a state responsibility) - Was not without controversy - the Australian Education Union and some parent groups had raised concerns about implementation timelines and resourcing **The Coalition review was a political response, not unique:** Curriculum reviews are a normal part of education governance.
 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 课程kè chéng kè chéng 是shì shì 在zài zài RuddRudd Rudd -- - GillardGillard Gillard 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ （（ （ 20082008 2008 -- - 20132013 2013 年nián nián ）） ） 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 期间qī jiān qī jiān ，， ， 在zài zài 20072007 2007 年nián nián 大选dà xuǎn dà xuǎn 后hòu hòu 启动qǐ dòng qǐ dòng 的de de [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。 。
The Coalition's 2014 review was politically motivated - Pyne explicitly wanted to examine whether the curriculum had "left-wing bias" and insufficient focus on Western civilization [1].
 开发kāi fā kāi fā 过程guò chéng guò chéng ：： ：
However, incoming governments reviewing or modifying policies developed by predecessors is standard practice across the political spectrum.
 -- - 由yóu yóu ACARAACARA ACARA 领导lǐng dǎo lǐng dǎo ，， ， 这是zhè shì zhè shì 一个yí gè yí gè 根据gēn jù gēn jù 20082008 2008 年nián nián 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 课程kè chéng kè chéng 、、 、 评估píng gū píng gū 和hé hé 报告bào gào bào gào 管理局guǎn lǐ jú guǎn lǐ jú 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 成立chéng lì chéng lì 的de de 法定fǎ dìng fǎ dìng 机构jī gòu jī gòu [[ [ 99 9 ]] ]
Labor governments have similarly commissioned reviews of education policies established by Coalition governments.
 -- - 涉及shè jí shè jí 与yǔ yǔ 数千名shù qiān míng shù qiān míng 利益lì yì lì yì 相关者xiāng guān zhě xiāng guān zhě 的de de 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 协商xié shāng xié shāng [[ [ 77 7 ]] ]
For example, Labor commissioned reviews of various Howard government education initiatives when it came to power in 2007. **Comparative context:** The claim frames the review as uniquely problematic because of the individuals involved.
 -- - 需要xū yào xū yào 各州gè zhōu gè zhōu 和hé hé 领地lǐng dì lǐng dì 的de de 同意tóng yì tóng yì （（ （ 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi 教育jiào yù jiào yù 根据gēn jù gēn jù 宪法xiàn fǎ xiàn fǎ 是shì shì 州zhōu zhōu 的de de 责任zé rèn zé rèn ）） ）
However, the actual controversy was: 1. **Timing** - The review began before full curriculum implementation (criticized by educators as disruptive) 2. **Perceived ideological bias** - The reviewers (Donnelly and Wiltshire) were known conservative critics of the existing curriculum 3. **Subsequent Spurr revelations** - The racist emails emerged months after the review was announced, raising questions about vetting of subject experts
 -- - 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì —— — —— — 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 教育jiào yù jiào yù 工会gōng huì gōng huì 和hé hé 一些yī xiē yī xiē 家长jiā zhǎng jiā zhǎng 团体tuán tǐ tuán tǐ 曾céng céng 对duì duì 实施shí shī shí shī 时间表shí jiān biǎo shí jiān biǎo 和hé hé 资源zī yuán zī yuán 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 担忧dān yōu dān yōu
** * ** * 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 审查shěn chá shěn chá 是shì shì 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 回应huí yìng huí yìng ，， ， 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 独特dú tè dú tè ：： ： ** * ** *
课程kè chéng kè chéng 审查shěn chá shěn chá 是shì shì 教育jiào yù jiào yù 治理zhì lǐ zhì lǐ 的de de 正常zhèng cháng zhèng cháng 组成部分zǔ chéng bù fèn zǔ chéng bù fèn 。。 。
20142014 2014 年nián nián 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 的de de 审查shěn chá shěn chá 是shì shì 出于chū yú chū yú 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 动机dòng jī dòng jī —— — —— — PynePyne Pyne 明确míng què míng què 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 希望xī wàng xī wàng 审查shěn chá shěn chá 课程kè chéng kè chéng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 存在cún zài cún zài "" " 左翼zuǒ yì zuǒ yì 偏见piān jiàn piān jiàn "" " 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 对duì duì 西方xī fāng xī fāng 文明wén míng wén míng 关注guān zhù guān zhù 不足bù zú bù zú [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， 新政府xīn zhèng fǔ xīn zhèng fǔ 审查shěn chá shěn chá 或huò huò 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi 前任qián rèn qián rèn 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 制定zhì dìng zhì dìng 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 是shì shì 各gè gè 政治派别zhèng zhì pài bié zhèng zhì pài bié 的de de 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ 。。 。
工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 掌权zhǎng quán zhǎng quán 时shí shí 也yě yě 同样tóng yàng tóng yàng 委托wěi tuō wěi tuō 审查shěn chá shěn chá 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 制定zhì dìng zhì dìng 的de de 教育jiào yù jiào yù 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 。。 。
例如lì rú lì rú ，， ， 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 在zài zài 20072007 2007 年nián nián 掌权zhǎng quán zhǎng quán 时shí shí 委托wěi tuō wěi tuō 审查shěn chá shěn chá 霍华德huò huá dé huò huá dé 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 各种gè zhǒng gè zhǒng 教育jiào yù jiào yù 举措jǔ cuò jǔ cuò 。。 。
** * ** * 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ：： ： ** * ** *
该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 将jiāng jiāng 审查shěn chá shěn chá 框定kuāng dìng kuāng dìng 为wèi wèi 因yīn yīn 涉及shè jí shè jí 人员rén yuán rén yuán 而ér ér 独特dú tè dú tè 存在cún zài cún zài 问题wèn tí wèn tí 。。 。
然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， 实际shí jì shí jì 的de de 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì 是shì shì ：： ：
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 时机shí jī shí jī ** * ** * —— — —— — 审查shěn chá shěn chá 是shì shì 在zài zài 课程kè chéng kè chéng 全面实施quán miàn shí shī quán miàn shí shī 之前zhī qián zhī qián 开始kāi shǐ kāi shǐ 的de de （（ （ 被bèi bèi 教育工作者jiào yù gōng zuò zhě jiào yù gōng zuò zhě 批评pī píng pī píng 为wèi wèi 破坏性pò huài xìng pò huài xìng ）） ）
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 感知gǎn zhī gǎn zhī 的de de 意识形态yì shí xíng tài yì shí xíng tài 偏见piān jiàn piān jiàn ** * ** * —— — —— — 评审píng shěn píng shěn 人rén rén （（ （ DonnellyDonnelly Donnelly 和hé hé WiltshireWiltshire Wiltshire ）） ） 是shì shì 已知yǐ zhī yǐ zhī 对duì duì 现有xiàn yǒu xiàn yǒu 课程kè chéng kè chéng 持chí chí 批评pī píng pī píng 态度tài dù tài dù 的de de 保守派bǎo shǒu pài bǎo shǒu pài
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 随后suí hòu suí hòu 的de de SpurrSpurr Spurr 曝光bào guāng bào guāng ** * ** * —— — —— — 种族主义zhǒng zú zhǔ yì zhǒng zú zhǔ yì 电子邮件diàn zi yóu jiàn diàn zi yóu jiàn 在zài zài 审查shěn chá shěn chá 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 数月shù yuè shù yuè 后hòu hòu 出现chū xiàn chū xiàn ，， ， 引发yǐn fā yǐn fā 了le le 对duì duì 学科xué kē xué kē 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 审查shěn chá shěn chá 程序chéng xù chéng xù 的de de 质疑zhì yí zhì yí
🌐

平衡视角

** * ** * 对duì duì 审查shěn chá shěn chá 程序chéng xù chéng xù 的de de 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 批评pī píng pī píng ：： ： ** * ** *
**Legitimate criticisms of the review process:** - The appointment of Donnelly and Wiltshire was politically charged, given both had publicly criticized the national curriculum and were associated with conservative education viewpoints [10][11] - The subject experts selected by Donnelly and Wiltshire included several with Coalition party links and connections to right-wing think tanks (IPA, CIS, Menzies Research Centre) [2] - Only one of the 15 subject experts was from the public school sector (one was from Pyne's own electorate), while four were from private schools and three from Catholic education [2] - The Barry Spurr email scandal revealed serious flaws in the vetting process for subject experts **Legitimate defense of the review:** - The review was a standard government process - new governments routinely review predecessor policies - The principal reviewers (Donnelly and Wiltshire) had relevant academic credentials - Donnelly had a PhD in curriculum studies and 18 years teaching experience; Wiltshire was a professor at University of Queensland who had previously reviewed Queensland's curriculum under a Labor government [10][11] - The review did not unilaterally "rewrite" curriculum - it made recommendations that required state/territory agreement - The racist comments at the center of the claim were made by a subject expert consultant (Spurr), not the principal reviewers, and only came to light months after the review was commissioned **Key distinction:** The claim conflates: 1.
 -- - 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng DonnellyDonnelly Donnelly 和hé hé WiltshireWiltshire Wiltshire 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 色彩sè cǎi sè cǎi ，， ， 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi 两人liǎng rén liǎng rén 都dōu dōu 公开批评gōng kāi pī píng gōng kāi pī píng 过guò guò 国家guó jiā guó jiā 课程kè chéng kè chéng ，， ， 并bìng bìng 与yǔ yǔ 保守派bǎo shǒu pài bǎo shǒu pài 教育jiào yù jiào yù 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn 相关联xiāng guān lián xiāng guān lián [[ [ 1010 10 ]] ] [[ [ 1111 11 ]] ]
Barry Spurr (subject expert consultant who made racist comments) 2.
 -- - DonnellyDonnelly Donnelly 和hé hé WiltshireWiltshire Wiltshire 挑选tiāo xuǎn tiāo xuǎn 的de de 学科xué kē xué kē 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 中zhōng zhōng ，， ， 有yǒu yǒu 几位jǐ wèi jǐ wèi 与yǔ yǔ 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 有yǒu yǒu 联系lián xì lián xì ，， ， 并bìng bìng 与yǔ yǔ 右翼yòu yì yòu yì 智库zhì kù zhì kù （（ （ IPAIPA IPA 、、 、 CISCIS CIS 、、 、 孟席斯mèng xí sī mèng xí sī 研究yán jiū yán jiū 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn ）） ） 有yǒu yǒu 关联guān lián guān lián [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
Kevin Donnelly (principal reviewer who made controversial comments about homosexuality in a 2004 book) 3.
 -- - 1515 15 名míng míng 学科xué kē xué kē 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 中zhōng zhōng 只有zhǐ yǒu zhǐ yǒu 一人yī rén yī rén 来自lái zì lái zì 公立学校gōng lì xué xiào gōng lì xué xiào 部门bù mén bù mén （（ （ 一人yī rén yī rén 来自lái zì lái zì PynePyne Pyne 自己zì jǐ zì jǐ 的de de 选区xuǎn qū xuǎn qū ）） ） ，， ， 而四人ér sì rén ér sì rén 来自lái zì lái zì 私立学校sī lì xué xiào sī lì xué xiào ，， ， 三人sān rén sān rén 来自lái zì lái zì 天主教tiān zhǔ jiào tiān zhǔ jiào 教育jiào yù jiào yù [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
Ken Wiltshire (principal reviewer with conservative views but no documented evidence of the specific comments attributed to him) This creates a misleading impression that two people were "writing the curriculum" and both held these extreme views, when the reality was more complex.
 -- - BarryBarry Barry SpurrSpurr Spurr 电子邮件diàn zi yóu jiàn diàn zi yóu jiàn 丑闻chǒu wén chǒu wén 揭示jiē shì jiē shì 了le le 学科xué kē xué kē 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 审查shěn chá shěn chá 程序chéng xù chéng xù 存在cún zài cún zài 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 缺陷quē xiàn quē xiàn
** * ** * 对duì duì 审查shěn chá shěn chá 的de de 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 辩护biàn hù biàn hù ：： ： ** * ** *
-- - 审查shěn chá shěn chá 是shì shì 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 的de de 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 程序chéng xù chéng xù —— — —— — 新政府xīn zhèng fǔ xīn zhèng fǔ 例行lì xíng lì xíng 审查shěn chá shěn chá 前任qián rèn qián rèn 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè
-- - 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 评审píng shěn píng shěn 人rén rén （（ （ DonnellyDonnelly Donnelly 和hé hé WiltshireWiltshire Wiltshire ）） ） 拥有yōng yǒu yōng yǒu 相关xiāng guān xiāng guān 的de de 学术xué shù xué shù 资质zī zhì zī zhì —— — —— — DonnellyDonnelly Donnelly 拥有yōng yǒu yōng yǒu 课程kè chéng kè chéng 研究yán jiū yán jiū 博士学位bó shì xué wèi bó shì xué wèi 和hé hé 1818 18 年nián nián 教学jiào xué jiào xué 经验jīng yàn jīng yàn ；； ； WiltshireWiltshire Wiltshire 是shì shì 昆士兰kūn shì lán kūn shì lán 大学教授dà xué jiào shòu dà xué jiào shòu ，， ， 曾céng céng 在zài zài 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 下xià xià 审查shěn chá shěn chá 过guò guò 昆士兰kūn shì lán kūn shì lán 课程kè chéng kè chéng [[ [ 1010 10 ]] ] [[ [ 1111 11 ]] ]
-- - 审查shěn chá shěn chá 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 单方面dān fāng miàn dān fāng miàn "" " 重写zhòng xiě zhòng xiě "" " 课程kè chéng kè chéng —— — —— — 它tā tā 提出tí chū tí chū 了le le 需要xū yào xū yào 各州gè zhōu gè zhōu // / 领地lǐng dì lǐng dì 同意tóng yì tóng yì 的de de 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì
-- - 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 核心hé xīn hé xīn 的de de 种族主义zhǒng zú zhǔ yì zhǒng zú zhǔ yì 言论yán lùn yán lùn 是shì shì 由yóu yóu 学科xué kē xué kē 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 顾问gù wèn gù wèn （（ （ SpurrSpurr Spurr ）） ） 发表fā biǎo fā biǎo 的de de ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 评审píng shěn píng shěn 人rén rén ，， ， 而且ér qiě ér qiě 是shì shì 在zài zài 审查shěn chá shěn chá 委托wěi tuō wěi tuō 数月shù yuè shù yuè 后hòu hòu 才cái cái 曝光bào guāng bào guāng 的de de
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 区别qū bié qū bié ：： ： ** * ** *
该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 混淆hùn xiáo hùn xiáo 了le le ：： ：
11 1 .. . BarryBarry Barry SpurrSpurr Spurr （（ （ 发表fā biǎo fā biǎo 种族主义zhǒng zú zhǔ yì zhǒng zú zhǔ yì 言论yán lùn yán lùn 的de de 学科xué kē xué kē 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 顾问gù wèn gù wèn ）） ）
22 2 .. . KevinKevin Kevin DonnellyDonnelly Donnelly （（ （ 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 评审píng shěn píng shěn 人rén rén ，， ， 在zài zài 20042004 2004 年nián nián 著作zhù zuò zhù zuò 中zhōng zhōng 对duì duì 同性恋tóng xìng liàn tóng xìng liàn 发表fā biǎo fā biǎo 了le le 有yǒu yǒu 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì 的de de 言论yán lùn yán lùn ）） ）
33 3 .. . KenKen Ken WiltshireWiltshire Wiltshire （（ （ 持有chí yǒu chí yǒu 保守bǎo shǒu bǎo shǒu 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn 的de de 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 评审píng shěn píng shěn 人rén rén ，， ， 但dàn dàn 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 他tā tā 发表fā biǎo fā biǎo 了le le 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 归于guī yú guī yú 他tā tā 的de de 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 言论yán lùn yán lùn ）） ）
这zhè zhè 造成zào chéng zào chéng 了le le 一种yī zhǒng yī zhǒng 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng 的de de 印象yìn xiàng yìn xiàng ，， ， 即jí jí 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 人rén rén 在zài zài "" " 编写biān xiě biān xiě 课程kè chéng kè chéng "" " ，， ， 而且ér qiě ér qiě 两人liǎng rén liǎng rén 都dōu dōu 持有chí yǒu chí yǒu 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 极端jí duān jí duān 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn ，， ， 而ér ér 现实xiàn shí xiàn shí 更为gèng wéi gèng wéi 复杂fù zá fù zá 。。 。

具有误导性

4.0

/ 10

该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 在zài zài 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 歪曲wāi qū wāi qū 了le le 20142014 2014 年nián nián 课程kè chéng kè chéng 审查shěn chá shěn chá 的de de 性质xìng zhì xìng zhì 、、 、 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi 和hé hé 人员构成rén yuán gòu chéng rén yuán gòu chéng ：： ：
The claim misrepresents the nature, scope, and personnel of the 2014 curriculum review in several significant ways: 1. **Personnel conflation**: The inflammatory racist comments were made by Professor Barry Spurr (one of 15 subject expert consultants), NOT by either of the two principal reviewers (Donnelly and Wiltshire).
 11 1 .. . ** * ** * 人员rén yuán rén yuán 混淆hùn xiáo hùn xiáo ** * ** * ：： ： 煽动性shān dòng xìng shān dòng xìng 的de de 种族主义zhǒng zú zhǔ yì zhǒng zú zhǔ yì 言论yán lùn yán lùn 是shì shì 由yóu yóu BarryBarry Barry SpurrSpurr Spurr 教授jiào shòu jiào shòu （（ （ 1515 15 名míng míng 学科xué kē xué kē 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 顾问gù wèn gù wèn 之一zhī yī zhī yī ）） ） 发表fā biǎo fā biǎo 的de de ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 两位liǎng wèi liǎng wèi 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 评审píng shěn píng shěn 人rén rén （（ （ DonnellyDonnelly Donnelly 和hé hé WiltshireWiltshire Wiltshire ）） ） 中zhōng zhōng 的de de 任何rèn hé rèn hé 一位yī wèi yī wèi 。。 。
The claim conflates them into "one" of "two people" writing the curriculum. 2. **Factual error on review structure**: The review involved two principal reviewers overseeing 15 subject experts - not "two people" writing the curriculum alone. 3. **Unverified attribution**: No evidence was found that Ken Wiltshire questioned whether migrants and women are disadvantaged. 4. **Oversimplified process**: The review was a recommendation-making process, not a unilateral "rewrite." The federal government cannot unilaterally impose curriculum changes - implementation requires state/territory agreement. 5. **Missing context**: The claim omits that the review was conducted before full curriculum implementation, that both curriculum development and the review involved consultation, and that governments routinely review predecessor policies.
 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 将jiāng jiāng 他们tā men tā men 混hùn hùn 为wèi wèi 编写biān xiě biān xiě 课程kè chéng kè chéng 的de de "" " 两人liǎng rén liǎng rén 中zhōng zhōng 的de de 其中qí zhōng qí zhōng 一人yī rén yī rén "" " 。。 。
While there were legitimate concerns about the partisan nature of the review appointments and the subsequent Spurr email scandal, the claim's factual errors and conflations present a misleading picture of what occurred.
 22 2 .. . ** * ** * 审查shěn chá shěn chá 结构jié gòu jié gòu 的de de 事实shì shí shì shí 错误cuò wù cuò wù ** * ** * ：： ： 审查shěn chá shěn chá 涉及shè jí shè jí 两位liǎng wèi liǎng wèi 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 评审píng shěn píng shěn 人rén rén 监督jiān dū jiān dū 1515 15 名míng míng 学科xué kē xué kē 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā —— — —— — 而ér ér 非fēi fēi "" " 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 人rén rén "" " 独自dú zì dú zì 编写biān xiě biān xiě 课程kè chéng kè chéng 。。 。
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 未经wèi jīng wèi jīng 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí 的de de 归属guī shǔ guī shǔ ** * ** * ：： ： 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng KenKen Ken WiltshireWiltshire Wiltshire 质疑zhì yí zhì yí 移民yí mín yí mín 和hé hé 女性nǚ xìng nǚ xìng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 处于chǔ yú chǔ yú 不利bù lì bù lì 地位dì wèi dì wèi 。。 。
44 4 .. . ** * ** * 过度guò dù guò dù 简化jiǎn huà jiǎn huà 的de de 流程liú chéng liú chéng ** * ** * ：： ： 审查shěn chá shěn chá 是shì shì 一个yí gè yí gè 提出tí chū tí chū 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 的de de 过程guò chéng guò chéng ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 单方面dān fāng miàn dān fāng miàn 的de de "" " 重写zhòng xiě zhòng xiě "" " 。。 。
联邦政府lián bāng zhèng fǔ lián bāng zhèng fǔ 不能bù néng bù néng 单方面dān fāng miàn dān fāng miàn 强制qiáng zhì qiáng zhì 推行tuī xíng tuī xíng 课程kè chéng kè chéng 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé —— — —— — 实施shí shī shí shī 需要xū yào xū yào 各州gè zhōu gè zhōu // / 领地lǐng dì lǐng dì 的de de 同意tóng yì tóng yì 。。 。
55 5 .. . ** * ** * 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ** * ** * ：： ： 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 忽略hū lüè hū lüè 了le le 审查shěn chá shěn chá 是shì shì 在zài zài 课程kè chéng kè chéng 全面实施quán miàn shí shī quán miàn shí shī 之前zhī qián zhī qián 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 的de de ，， ， 课程kè chéng kè chéng 开发kāi fā kāi fā 和hé hé 审查shěn chá shěn chá 都dōu dōu 涉及shè jí shè jí 咨询zī xún zī xún ，， ， 而且ér qiě ér qiě 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 例行lì xíng lì xíng 审查shěn chá shěn chá 前任qián rèn qián rèn 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 。。 。
虽然suī rán suī rán 审查shěn chá shěn chá 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 的de de 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 性质xìng zhì xìng zhì 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 随后suí hòu suí hòu 的de de SpurrSpurr Spurr 电子邮件diàn zi yóu jiàn diàn zi yóu jiàn 丑闻chǒu wén chǒu wén 确实què shí què shí 存在cún zài cún zài 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 的de de 担忧dān yōu dān yōu ，， ， 但dàn dàn 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 的de de 事实shì shí shì shí 错误cuò wù cuò wù 和hé hé 混淆hùn xiáo hùn xiáo 呈现chéng xiàn chéng xiàn 了le le 所suǒ suǒ 发生fā shēng fā shēng 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn 的de de 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng 图景tú jǐng tú jǐng 。。 。

📚 来源与引用 (11)

  1. 1
    School curriculum review panellist Kevin Donnelly hits back at critics

    School curriculum review panellist Kevin Donnelly hits back at critics

    Conservative education commentator Kevin Donnelly claims he is one of the best people for the job after 'vitriolic attack' on his credentials

    the Guardian
  2. 2
    Questions over curriculum experts' links to Coalition

    Questions over curriculum experts' links to Coalition

    The subject experts appointed to the Abbott government's national curriculum review included several figures with close Coalition links who were chosen without any scrutiny from education officials.

    The Sydney Morning Herald
  3. 3
    Professor Barry Spurr suspended by University of Sydney after racist emails

    Professor Barry Spurr suspended by University of Sydney after racist emails

    Professor Barry Spurr is under pressure to resign from his position at the University of Sydney, after referring to people as "Abos",  "bogans", "fatsoes", "Mussies" and "Chinky-Poos" in a series of leaked emails.

    The Sydney Morning Herald
  4. 4
    Curriculum Reviewer Barry Spurr Mocks 'Abos, Mussies, Women, Chinky-Poos'

    Curriculum Reviewer Barry Spurr Mocks 'Abos, Mussies, Women, Chinky-Poos'

    A University of Sydney Professor – employed by the federal government as a specialist consultant to review the national English curriculum – has described the Prime Minister as an “Abo lover” while at the same time advising the government to focus less on teaching Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander literature in our nation’s schools, andMore

    New Matilda
  5. 5
    Leave sex lessons to straight teachers, writes Pyne's reviewer

    Leave sex lessons to straight teachers, writes Pyne's reviewer

    Kevin Donnelly, chosen to review the national school curriculum, says many parents believe the sexual practices of gays, lesbians and transgender individuals are ''decidedly unnatural'' and has questioned whether students ought to learn about such relationships at school.

    The Sydney Morning Herald
  6. 6
    PDF

    Review of the Australian Curriculum - Final Report

    F000 Backblazeb2 • PDF Document
    Original link no longer available
  7. 7
    Development of the Australian Curriculum

    Development of the Australian Curriculum

    Development of the Australian Curriculum
  8. 8
    National curriculum review premature, say parents and teachers

    National curriculum review premature, say parents and teachers

    Lead writer of the history curriculum rejects claims of leftwing bias, saying it was refined through an 'exhaustingly consultative' process

    the Guardian
  9. 9
    eric.ed.gov

    National Curriculum and Federalism: The Australian Experience

    Whilst the past 35 years have seen numerous attempts at national curriculum collaboration in Australia, these have invariably failed largely due to the constitutional reality that the States have responsibility for curriculum. Federal government involvement in curriculum can only be achieved, therefore, with the consent of the States. To achieve this, in 2008 the Rudd Federal government passed the Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) Act (2008) which legislated the establishment of ACARA, a national education authority which brought together, for the first time "the functions of curriculum, assessment and reporting at the national level" (Julia Gillard, media release, 2008). Among its mandates, ACARA is responsible for the development of national curriculum, one of the key election platforms on which the current Rudd Federal Labor government was elected in November 2007. Whilst the ACARA Act appears on the surface to represent unprecedented

    EJ894320
  10. 10
    History wars: the men behind the national school curriculum review

    History wars: the men behind the national school curriculum review

    Christopher Pyne has announced a review of the school curriculum; but what do we know about Kevin Donnelly and Ken Wiltshire, the two men he has appointed to run the process?

    the Guardian
  11. 11
    Education review: overhaul of 'bloated' national curriculum widely supported

    Education review: overhaul of 'bloated' national curriculum widely supported

    The Abbott government's controversial review of the national curriculum has failed to reignite the culture wars as expected with its recommendations receiving widespread support across the country.

    The Sydney Morning Herald

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性，但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。

Previous: C0923 Next: C0925