属实

评分: 8.0/10

Coalition
C0721

声明内容

“削减澳大利亚艺术委员会2820万澳元拨款,该委员会为艺术领域提供资助。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis

原始来源

事实核查

gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ ** * ** * 属实shǔ shí shǔ shí ** * ** *
The claim is **TRUE**.
AbbottAbbott Abbott 联合政府lián hé zhèng fǔ lián hé zhèng fǔ 发布fā bù fā bù de de 20142014 2014 -- - 1515 15 年度nián dù nián dù 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 预算yù suàn yù suàn 确实què shí què shí 宣布xuān bù xuān bù zài zài 四年sì nián sì nián nèi nèi 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 艺术yì shù yì shù 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 28202820 2820 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
The 2014-15 Federal Budget announced by the Abbott Coalition Government did cut $28.2 million from the Australia Council over four years [1][2][3]. **Specific cut breakdown:** - 2014/15: $9.6 million - 2015/16: $6.1 million - 2016/17: $6.2 million - 2017/18: $6.3 million - **Total: $28.2 million** [3] The Australia Council CEO Tony Grybowski confirmed this would result in "fewer and smaller" grants to individual artists and cuts to small arts organizations [2].
** * ** * 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 明细míng xì míng xì ** * ** *
At the time, the Australia Council had an annual budget of approximately $222 million [2].
-- - 20142014 2014 // / 1515 15 年度nián dù nián dù 960960 960 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán
This cut was part of a broader $87.1 million reduction in federal arts funding that also included: - Screen Australia: $25.1 million cut over four years [1][2][3] - Attorney-General's Department arts programs: $33.8 million cut [1][3]
-- - 20152015 2015 // / 1616 16 年度nián dù nián dù 610610 610 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán
-- - 20162016 2016 // / 1717 17 年度nián dù nián dù 620620 620 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán
-- - 20172017 2017 // / 1818 18 年度nián dù nián dù 630630 630 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán
-- - ** * ** * 总计zǒng jì zǒng jì 28202820 2820 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán ** * ** * [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 艺术yì shù yì shù 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 首席shǒu xí shǒu xí 执行官zhí xíng guān zhí xíng guān TonyTony Tony GrybowskiGrybowski Grybowski 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí zhè zhè jiāng jiāng 导致dǎo zhì dǎo zhì duì duì 个人gè rén gè rén 艺术家yì shù jiā yì shù jiā de de 资助zī zhù zī zhù "" " 数量shù liàng shù liàng 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 金额jīn é jīn é 降低jiàng dī jiàng dī "" " bìng bìng 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn duì duì 小型xiǎo xíng xiǎo xíng 艺术yì shù yì shù 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī de de 资助zī zhù zī zhù [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
当时dāng shí dāng shí 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 艺术yì shù yì shù 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì de de 年度预算nián dù yù suàn nián dù yù suàn yuē yuē wèi wèi 2.222.22 2.22 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
此次cǐ cì cǐ cì 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn shì shì 总额zǒng é zǒng é 87108710 8710 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán de de 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 艺术yì shù yì shù 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 缩减suō jiǎn suō jiǎn 计划jì huà jì huà de de 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn gāi gāi 计划jì huà jì huà hái hái 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò
-- - 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 银幕yín mù yín mù shǔ shǔ (( ( ScreenScreen Screen AustraliaAustralia Australia )) ) 四年sì nián sì nián nèi nèi 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 25102510 2510 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
-- - zǒng zǒng 检察长jiǎn chá zhǎng jiǎn chá zhǎng 部门bù mén bù mén 艺术yì shù yì shù 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 33803380 3380 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]

缺失背景

gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu le le 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 因素yīn sù yīn sù
The claim omits several important contextual factors: 1. **"Uncommitted funding" targeted**: The cuts specifically targeted "uncommitted funding" rather than established triennial or annual funding agreements [1].
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì "" " wèi wèi 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 资金zī jīn zī jīn "" " ** * ** * 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 专门zhuān mén zhuān mén 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì "" " wèi wèi 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 资金zī jīn zī jīn "" " ér ér fēi fēi 既定jì dìng jì dìng de de 三年期sān nián qī sān nián qī huò huò 年度nián dù nián dù 资助zī zhù zī zhù 协议xié yì xié yì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
This meant the cuts disproportionately affected individual artists and small-to-medium arts organizations rather than major performing arts companies, which maintained their funding [1][2]. 2. **Reversal of Labor's Creative Australia Strategy**: Under the previous Labor government's Creative Australia Strategy, the Australia Council had been promised $75.3 million in new funding for arts [1][2].
zhè zhè 意味着yì wèi zhe yì wèi zhe 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 不成比例bù chéng bǐ lì bù chéng bǐ lì 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng le le 个人gè rén gè rén 艺术家yì shù jiā yì shù jiā 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 中小型zhōng xiǎo xíng zhōng xiǎo xíng 艺术yì shù yì shù 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī ér ér 大型dà xíng dà xíng 表演艺术biǎo yǎn yì shù biǎo yǎn yì shù 公司gōng sī gōng sī 保住bǎo zhù bǎo zhù le le 资助zī zhù zī zhù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
The Coalition cuts effectively reversed most of this expansion. 3. **Counterbalancing initiatives**: The budget simultaneously increased funding by $5.3 million over four years to Creative Partnerships Australia to encourage private philanthropy as an alternative to direct government subsidy [1]. 4. **Less than Commission of Audit recommended**: The budget resisted the Commission of Audit's recommendations to merge Australia Council and Screen Australia, and the actual cuts were lower than what the Commission had recommended [3]. 5. **Budget-wide austerity context**: These cuts were part of the government's broader 2014 budget austerity measures affecting multiple sectors.
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 逆转nì zhuǎn nì zhuǎn LaborLabor Labor de de CreativeCreative Creative AustraliaAustralia Australia 战略zhàn lüè zhàn lüè ** * ** * zài zài shàng shàng 一届yī jiè yī jiè LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ de de CreativeCreative Creative AustraliaAustralia Australia 战略zhàn lüè zhàn lüè xià xià 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 艺术yì shù yì shù 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì céng céng 获得huò dé huò dé 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 新增xīn zēng xīn zēng 75307530 7530 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 艺术yì shù yì shù 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
An Arts Minister spokesperson stated budget reform meant "the heavy lifting was spread across the board and arts was not immune" [2].
联合政府lián hé zhèng fǔ lián hé zhèng fǔ de de 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 逆转nì zhuǎn nì zhuǎn le le zhè zhè 扩张kuò zhāng kuò zhāng 计划jì huà jì huà de de 大部分dà bù fèn dà bù fèn 内容nèi róng nèi róng
33 3 .. . ** * ** * duì duì děng děng 措施cuò shī cuò shī ** * ** * 预算yù suàn yù suàn 同时tóng shí tóng shí jiāng jiāng 四年sì nián sì nián nèi nèi 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 增加zēng jiā zēng jiā 530530 530 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán gěi gěi CreativeCreative Creative PartnershipsPartnerships Partnerships AustraliaAustralia Australia 鼓励gǔ lì gǔ lì 私人sī rén sī rén 慈善cí shàn cí shàn 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 补贴bǔ tiē bǔ tiē de de 替代tì dài tì dài 方案fāng àn fāng àn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
44 4 .. . ** * ** * 低于dī yú dī yú 审计shěn jì shěn jì 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì ** * ** * 预算yù suàn yù suàn 抵制dǐ zhì dǐ zhì le le 审计shěn jì shěn jì 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 关于guān yú guān yú 合并hé bìng hé bìng 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 艺术yì shù yì shù 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 银幕yín mù yín mù shǔ shǔ de de 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì qiě qiě 实际shí jì shí jì 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 幅度fú dù fú dù 低于dī yú dī yú 审计shěn jì shěn jì 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì de de 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
55 5 .. . ** * ** * quán quán 预算yù suàn yù suàn 紧缩jǐn suō jǐn suō 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ** * ** * 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn shì shì 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 20142014 2014 nián nián 预算yù suàn yù suàn 紧缩jǐn suō jǐn suō 措施cuò shī cuò shī de de 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng le le 多个duō gè duō gè 领域lǐng yù lǐng yù
一位yī wèi yī wèi 艺术yì shù yì shù 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 发言人fā yán rén fā yán rén 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 预算yù suàn yù suàn 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 意味着yì wèi zhe yì wèi zhe "" " 各方gè fāng gè fāng dōu dōu 分担fēn dān fēn dān 重任zhòng rèn zhòng rèn 艺术yì shù yì shù 领域lǐng yù lǐng yù 例外lì wài lì wài "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]

来源可信度评估

** * ** * TheThe The MusicMusic Music (( ( themusicthemusic themusic .. . comcom com .. . auau au )) ) ** * ** * -- - 这是zhè shì zhè shì 一家yī jiā yī jiā 专注zhuān zhù zhuān zhù 音乐yīn yuè yīn yuè 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 行业háng yè háng yè 报道bào dào bào dào de de 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 音乐yīn yuè yīn yuè 行业háng yè háng yè 出版物chū bǎn wù chū bǎn wù
**The Music (themusic.com.au)** - This is an Australian music industry publication focused on music news and industry coverage.
似乎sì hū sì hū shì shì 一家yī jiā yī jiā 合法hé fǎ hé fǎ de de 行业háng yè háng yè 出版物chū bǎn wù chū bǎn wù ér ér fēi fēi 明显míng xiǎn míng xiǎn de de 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 消息xiāo xī xiāo xī yuán yuán
It appears to be a legitimate trade publication rather than an overtly partisan political source.
gāi gāi 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 提供tí gōng tí gōng le le 事实性shì shí xìng shì shí xìng 报道bào dào bào dào 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 数字shù zì shù zì jūn jūn 来自lái zì lái zì 官方guān fāng guān fāng 预算yù suàn yù suàn 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn
The article provided factual reporting with specific figures attributed to official budget documents.
shì shì gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ de de 可信kě xìn kě xìn 来源lái yuán lái yuán [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
It is a credible source for this claim [3]. **Supporting sources found:** - **The Conversation**: Academic journalism platform featuring expert commentary from university professors (RMIT, University of Melbourne, ANU, UNSW) - highly credible [1] - **ABC News**: Australia's national public broadcaster - highly credible and mainstream [2] All sources confirm the same figures and basic facts, indicating strong reliability for this claim.
** * ** * 找到zhǎo dào zhǎo dào de de 佐证zuǒ zhèng zuǒ zhèng 来源lái yuán lái yuán ** * ** *
-- - ** * ** * TheThe The ConversationConversation Conversation ** * ** * 学术xué shù xué shù 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 平台píng tái píng tái 刊载kān zǎi kān zǎi 大学教授dà xué jiào shòu dà xué jiào shòu 皇家huáng jiā huáng jiā 墨尔本mò ěr běn mò ěr běn 理工大学lǐ gōng dà xué lǐ gōng dà xué 墨尔本大学mò ěr běn dà xué mò ěr běn dà xué 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 国立大学guó lì dà xué guó lì dà xué 新南威尔士xīn nán wēi ěr shì xīn nán wēi ěr shì 大学dà xué dà xué de de 专业zhuān yè zhuān yè 评论píng lùn píng lùn 可信度kě xìn dù kě xìn dù 极高jí gāo jí gāo [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
-- - ** * ** * ABCABC ABC 新闻xīn wén xīn wén ** * ** * 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 国家guó jiā guó jiā 公共广播gōng gòng guǎng bō gōng gòng guǎng bō 机构jī gòu jī gòu 可信度kě xìn dù kě xìn dù 极高且jí gāo qiě jí gāo qiě 为主wéi zhǔ wéi zhǔ 流媒体liú méi tǐ liú méi tǐ [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 来源lái yuán lái yuán dōu dōu 确认què rèn què rèn le le 相同xiāng tóng xiāng tóng de de 数字shù zì shù zì 基本jī běn jī běn 事实shì shí shì shí 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu hěn hěn gāo gāo de de 可靠性kě kào xìng kě kào xìng
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 采取cǎi qǔ cǎi qǔ guò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ
**Did Labor do something similar?** The historical context reveals an inverse pattern rather than equivalence: **Labor's approach (2013):** The Gillard Labor government's Creative Australia Strategy had actually *increased* arts funding, promising $75.3 million in new money for the Australia Council [1][2].
** * ** *
The Coalition cuts effectively reversed these planned expansions. **Opposition response:** Labor's arts spokesman Mark Dreyfus stated: "Labor's Creative Australia policy added $200 million for the arts.
历史背景lì shǐ bèi jǐng lì shǐ bèi jǐng 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì de de shì shì 相反xiāng fǎn xiāng fǎn de de 模式mó shì mó shì ér ér fēi fēi 对等关系duì děng guān xì duì děng guān xì
This budget has taken most of that funding back" [2]. **Historical pattern:** Arts funding in Australia has historically fluctuated based on the party in power and economic conditions.
** * ** * LaborLabor Labor de de 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ 20132013 2013 nián nián ** * ** * GillardGillard Gillard LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ de de CreativeCreative Creative AustraliaAustralia Australia 战略zhàn lüè zhàn lüè 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng ** * 增加zēng jiā zēng jiā ** * le le 艺术yì shù yì shù 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò wèi wèi 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 艺术yì shù yì shù 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 提供tí gōng tí gōng 75307530 7530 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán xīn xīn 资金zī jīn zī jīn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
The Coalition's 2014 cuts represented a departure from Labor's expansionary approach, rather than both parties making equivalent cuts. **Comparable budget pressures:** Both parties have made adjustments to arts funding during budget tightening periods, though the scale and direction have differed.
联合政府lián hé zhèng fǔ lián hé zhèng fǔ de de 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 逆转nì zhuǎn nì zhuǎn le le 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 计划jì huà jì huà zhōng zhōng de de 扩张kuò zhāng kuò zhāng
The Coalition's approach emphasized private philanthropy through Creative Partnerships Australia, while Labor's approach emphasized direct public funding increases [1].
** * ** * 反对党fǎn duì dǎng fǎn duì dǎng 回应huí yìng huí yìng ** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 艺术yì shù yì shù 事务shì wù shì wù 发言人fā yán rén fā yán rén MarkMark Mark DreyfusDreyfus Dreyfus 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì "" " LaborLabor Labor de de CreativeCreative Creative AustraliaAustralia Australia 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè wèi wèi 艺术yì shù yì shù 领域lǐng yù lǐng yù 增加zēng jiā zēng jiā le le 22 2 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn
这份zhè fèn zhè fèn 预算yù suàn yù suàn 其中qí zhōng qí zhōng 大部分dà bù fèn dà bù fèn 资金zī jīn zī jīn 收回shōu huí shōu huí le le "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
** * ** * 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ 规律guī lǜ guī lǜ ** * ** * 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà de de 艺术yì shù yì shù 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 历来lì lái lì lái 根据gēn jù gēn jù 执政党zhí zhèng dǎng zhí zhèng dǎng 经济jīng jì jīng jì 状况zhuàng kuàng zhuàng kuàng ér ér 波动bō dòng bō dòng
联合政府lián hé zhèng fǔ lián hé zhèng fǔ 20142014 2014 nián nián de de 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo le le LaborLabor Labor 扩张性kuò zhāng xìng kuò zhāng xìng 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ de de 背离bèi lí bèi lí ér ér fēi fēi 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng dōu dōu 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng le le duì duì děng děng 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn
** * ** * 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào de de 预算yù suàn yù suàn 压力yā lì yā lì ** * ** * 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng zài zài 预算yù suàn yù suàn 紧缩jǐn suō jǐn suō 时期shí qī shí qī dōu dōu duì duì 艺术yì shù yì shù 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng guò guò 调整tiáo zhěng tiáo zhěng 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 规模guī mó guī mó 方向fāng xiàng fāng xiàng 有所不同yǒu suǒ bù tóng yǒu suǒ bù tóng
联合政府lián hé zhèng fǔ lián hé zhèng fǔ de de 方式fāng shì fāng shì 强调qiáng diào qiáng diào 通过tōng guò tōng guò CreativeCreative Creative PartnershipsPartnerships Partnerships AustraliaAustralia Australia 鼓励gǔ lì gǔ lì 私人sī rén sī rén 慈善cí shàn cí shàn ér ér LaborLabor Labor de de 方式fāng shì fāng shì 强调qiáng diào qiáng diào 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 增加zēng jiā zēng jiā 公共gōng gòng gōng gòng 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
🌐

平衡视角

28202820 2820 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 艺术yì shù yì shù 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn shì shì 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 发生fā shēng fā shēng de de bìng bìng duì duì 艺术yì shù yì shù 领域lǐng yù lǐng yù 产生chǎn shēng chǎn shēng le le 切实qiè shí qiè shí 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 特别tè bié tè bié shì shì 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng le le 依赖yī lài yī lài 竞争性jìng zhēng xìng jìng zhēng xìng 资助zī zhù zī zhù ér ér fēi fēi 既定jì dìng jì dìng 资助zī zhù zī zhù 协议xié yì xié yì de de 新兴xīn xīng xīn xīng 艺术家yì shù jiā yì shù jiā 小型xiǎo xíng xiǎo xíng 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
The $28.2 million Australia Council cut was real and had tangible impacts on the arts sector, particularly affecting emerging artists and small organizations who relied on competitive grants rather than established funding agreements [1][2]. **Criticisms of the cuts:** - Arts sector representatives argued the cuts would mean "less innovation, and probably less art being made" and could encourage artists to leave Australia [1] - The disproportionate impact on small-to-medium organizations while major companies were protected was criticized as inequitable [2] - Opposition arts spokesman Mark Dreyfus called the cuts "devastating" for arts and cultural activities across Australia [2] **Government justifications/context:** - The cuts were framed as part of necessary budget consolidation across all portfolios [2] - Targeting "uncommitted funding" allowed established major institutions to maintain operations while reducing discretionary spending [1] - The government simultaneously increased support for private philanthropy as an alternative funding mechanism [1] - The cuts were less severe than what the Commission of Audit had recommended [3] **Comparative analysis:** Unlike some policy areas where both major parties have similar records, arts funding has historically divided along partisan lines in Australia, with Labor typically expanding public arts funding and Coalition governments often reducing it or shifting toward private funding models.
** * ** * duì duì 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn de de 批评pī píng pī píng ** * ** *
This cut fits that broader pattern rather than representing a bipartisan consensus on austerity.
-- - 艺术界yì shù jiè yì shù jiè 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn jiāng jiāng 意味着yì wèi zhe yì wèi zhe "" " 创新chuàng xīn chuàng xīn 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 艺术创作yì shù chuàng zuò yì shù chuàng zuò 可能kě néng kě néng 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo "" " bìng bìng 可能kě néng kě néng 导致dǎo zhì dǎo zhì 艺术家yì shù jiā yì shù jiā 离开lí kāi lí kāi 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
-- - 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 不成比例bù chéng bǐ lì bù chéng bǐ lì 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 中小型zhōng xiǎo xíng zhōng xiǎo xíng 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī ér ér 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 大型dà xíng dà xíng 企业qǐ yè qǐ yè de de 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ bèi bèi 批评pī píng pī píng wèi wèi 公平gōng píng gōng píng [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
-- - 反对党fǎn duì dǎng fǎn duì dǎng 艺术yì shù yì shù 事务shì wù shì wù 发言人fā yán rén fā yán rén MarkMark Mark DreyfusDreyfus Dreyfus chēng chēng 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn duì duì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 各地gè dì gè dì de de 艺术yì shù yì shù 文化wén huà wén huà 活动huó dòng huó dòng "" " 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 毁灭性huǐ miè xìng huǐ miè xìng "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ de de 辩解biàn jiě biàn jiě // / 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ** * ** *
-- - 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn bèi bèi 定位dìng wèi dìng wèi wèi wèi 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 部门bù mén bù mén 预算yù suàn yù suàn 整合zhěng hé zhěng hé de de 必要bì yào bì yào 部分bù fèn bù fèn [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
-- - 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì "" " wèi wèi 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 资金zī jīn zī jīn "" " de de 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ 使shǐ shǐ 既定jì dìng jì dìng 大型dà xíng dà xíng 机构jī gòu jī gòu 能够néng gòu néng gòu 维持wéi chí wéi chí 运营yùn yíng yùn yíng 同时tóng shí tóng shí 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 自由支配zì yóu zhī pèi zì yóu zhī pèi 支出zhī chū zhī chū [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
-- - 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 同时tóng shí tóng shí 增加zēng jiā zēng jiā le le duì duì 私人sī rén sī rén 慈善cí shàn cí shàn de de 支持zhī chí zhī chí 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 替代tì dài tì dài 资金来源zī jīn lái yuán zī jīn lái yuán [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
-- - 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 幅度fú dù fú dù 低于dī yú dī yú 审计shěn jì shěn jì 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì de de 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
** * ** * 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào 分析fēn xī fēn xī ** * ** * 某些mǒu xiē mǒu xiē 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 记录jì lù jì lù 相似xiāng sì xiāng sì de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 领域lǐng yù lǐng yù 不同bù tóng bù tóng 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà de de 艺术yì shù yì shù 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 历来lì lái lì lái 沿yán yán 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 界线jiè xiàn jiè xiàn 划分huà fēn huà fēn LaborLabor Labor 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 扩大kuò dà kuò dà 公共gōng gòng gōng gòng 艺术yì shù yì shù 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn ér ér 联合政府lián hé zhèng fǔ lián hé zhèng fǔ 往往wǎng wǎng wǎng wǎng 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn huò huò 转向zhuǎn xiàng zhuǎn xiàng 私人sī rén sī rén 资助zī zhù zī zhù 模式mó shì mó shì
此次cǐ cì cǐ cì 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 符合fú hé fú hé 这一zhè yī zhè yī gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn de de 模式mó shì mó shì ér ér fēi fēi 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng duì duì 紧缩jǐn suō jǐn suō 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè de de 共识gòng shí gòng shí

属实

8.0

/ 10

gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ zài zài 事实shì shí shì shí 层面céng miàn céng miàn 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què
The claim is factually accurate.
联合政府lián hé zhèng fǔ lián hé zhèng fǔ 20142014 2014 -- - 1515 15 年度预算nián dù yù suàn nián dù yù suàn 确实què shí què shí zài zài 四年sì nián sì nián nèi nèi 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn le le 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 艺术yì shù yì shù 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 28202820 2820 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn
The Coalition Government's 2014-15 budget did cut $28.2 million from the Australia Council over four years.
金额jīn é jīn é 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 目标mù biāo mù biāo 机构jī gòu jī gòu 认定rèn dìng rèn dìng 正确zhèng què zhèng què 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 艺术yì shù yì shù 资助zī zhù zī zhù 属实shǔ shí shǔ shí
The figure is correct, the target organization is correctly identified, and the context (arts grants) is accurate.
然而rán ér rán ér gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 缺乏quē fá quē fá 关于guān yú guān yú 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 性质xìng zhì xìng zhì 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì wèi wèi 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 资金zī jīn zī jīn 逆转nì zhuǎn nì zhuǎn LaborLabor Labor CreativeCreative Creative AustraliaAustralia Australia 战略zhàn lüè zhàn lüè de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 这是zhè shì zhè shì 总额zǒng é zǒng é 87108710 8710 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 艺术yì shù yì shù 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 缩减suō jiǎn suō jiǎn 计划jì huà jì huà 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn de de 宏观hóng guān hóng guān 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng
However, the claim lacks context about the nature of the cuts (targeting uncommitted funding), the reversal of Labor's Creative Australia Strategy, and the broader $87.1 million arts funding reduction of which this was a part.

📚 来源与引用 (3)

  1. 1
    theconversation.com

    theconversation.com

    Even before the announcement of the 2014 budget by Australian Federal Treasurer Joe Hockey tonight, there were “budget bad news” leaks flying around in the media. So what do we know now? The as-yet-unspecified…

    The Conversation
  2. 2
    abc.net.au

    abc.net.au

    Hundreds of artists will be denied access to government grants and fewer films and television programs are likely to be funded after sweeping budget cuts to the Australia Council and Screen Australia.

    Abc Net
  3. 3
    themusic.com.au

    themusic.com.au

    Aus Council and Screen Australia face cuts

    The Music

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。