具有误导性

评分: 4.0/10

Coalition
C0666

声明内容

“为所有互联网服务提供商引入了强制性的元数据保留计划。政府承认这些变更并非必要,且没有证据表明这将改善执法工作。访问这些数据不需要搜查令。实施这些计划的成本约为每位客户每年额外100美元。这将用于惩罚非法下载者。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 通过tōng guò tōng guò 了le le 《《 《 20152015 2015 年nián nián 电信diàn xìn diàn xìn (( ( 拦截lán jié lán jié 与yǔ yǔ 访问fǎng wèn fǎng wèn )) ) 修正案xiū zhèng àn xiū zhèng àn (( ( 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú )) ) 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 》》 》 ,, , 该gāi gāi 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 于yú yú 20152015 2015 年nián nián 33 3 月yuè yuè 2626 26 日rì rì 生效shēng xiào shēng xiào [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The Coalition government did introduce the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment (Data Retention) Act 2015, which came into force on 26 March 2015 [1].
该gāi gāi 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 电信公司diàn xìn gōng sī diàn xìn gōng sī 至少zhì shǎo zhì shǎo 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 特定tè dìng tè dìng 元yuán yuán 数据shù jù shù jù 两年liǎng nián liǎng nián [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The legislation requires telecommunications companies to retain specific metadata for at least two years [2].
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 中zhōng zhōng 的de de 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 事实陈述shì shí chén shù shì shí chén shù 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng 或huò huò 属于shǔ yú shǔ yú 歪曲wāi qū wāi qū :: :
However, several factual claims in this claim are misleading or misrepresentations: **Claim: "The government admits the changes are not necessary"** This is a significant misrepresentation.
** * ** * 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng :: : "" " 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 变更biàn gēng biàn gēng 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 必要bì yào bì yào "" " ** * ** *
Attorney-General George Brandis said specific changes to protect journalists' sources were "not necessary" - NOT that the entire data retention scheme was unnecessary.
这是zhè shì zhè shì 一个yí gè yí gè 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 的de de 歪曲wāi qū wāi qū 。。 。
Brandis stated the government "agreed to a limited, but 'not necessary' exemption" specifically regarding journalist protections to secure parliamentary passage [3].
总zǒng zǒng 检察长jiǎn chá zhǎng jiǎn chá zhǎng GeorgeGeorge George BrandisBrandis Brandis 所说suǒ shuō suǒ shuō 的de de 是shì shì ,, , 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 记者jì zhě jì zhě 信息xìn xī xìn xī 来源lái yuán lái yuán 的de de 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi "" " 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 必要bì yào bì yào "" " —— — —— — 而ér ér 不是bú shì bú shì 整个zhěng gè zhěng gè 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 计划jì huà jì huà 都dōu dōu 不必要bù bì yào bù bì yào 。。 。
He explicitly stated: "At heart, all this legislation does is to mandate the continuation of the status quo" [3], referring to the existing practice of data retention by telcos, now made mandatory. **Claim: "No evidence to show that it will improve law enforcement"** The claim provides no source for this assertion.
BrandisBrandis Brandis 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì ,, , 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ "" " 同意tóng yì tóng yì 有限yǒu xiàn yǒu xiàn 但dàn dàn '' ' 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 必要bì yào bì yào '' ' 的de de 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn "" " ,, , 专门zhuān mén zhuān mén 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 记者jì zhě jì zhě 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 以yǐ yǐ 争取zhēng qǔ zhēng qǔ 议会yì huì yì huì 通过tōng guò tōng guò [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
Parliamentary records show the legislation was based on recommendations from the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security (PJCIS) [4].
他tā tā 明确míng què míng què 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì :: : "" " 从cóng cóng 本质běn zhì běn zhì 上shàng shàng 讲jiǎng jiǎng ,, , 这项zhè xiàng zhè xiàng 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 所suǒ suǒ 做zuò zuò 的de de 只是zhǐ shì zhǐ shì 强制qiáng zhì qiáng zhì 延续yán xù yán xù 现状xiàn zhuàng xiàn zhuàng "" " [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] ,, , 指zhǐ zhǐ 的de de 是shì shì 电信公司diàn xìn gōng sī diàn xìn gōng sī 现有xiàn yǒu xiàn yǒu 的de de 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ ,, , 现在xiàn zài xiàn zài 将jiāng jiāng 其qí qí 变为biàn wèi biàn wèi 强制性qiáng zhì xìng qiáng zhì xìng 。。 。
The scheme was supported by law enforcement agencies including the Australian Federal Police and ASIO, who testified to its importance for investigating serious crimes and terrorism [4]. **Claim: "Warrants will not be required to access the data"** This is partially accurate but misleading.
** * ** * 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng :: : "" " 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 这zhè zhè 将jiāng jiāng 改善gǎi shàn gǎi shàn 执法zhí fǎ zhí fǎ 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò "" " ** * ** *
While general access to metadata does not require judicial warrants, access is not unfettered.
该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 为此wèi cǐ wèi cǐ 断言duàn yán duàn yán 提供tí gōng tí gōng 任何rèn hé rèn hé 来源lái yuán lái yuán 。。 。
The legislation actually reduced the number of agencies that could access metadata without warrant from approximately 80 to about 20 specified agencies, including ASIO, federal and state police, state corruption bodies, ATO, ACCC, and ASIC [3].
议会yì huì yì huì 记录jì lù jì lù 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì ,, , 该gāi gāi 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 是shì shì 基于jī yú jī yú 议会yì huì yì huì 联合lián hé lián hé 情报qíng bào qíng bào 与yǔ yǔ 安全ān quán ān quán 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì (( ( PJCISPJCIS PJCIS )) ) 的de de 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
Additionally, warrants ARE required specifically to access journalists' metadata to identify sources [3].
该gāi gāi 计划jì huà jì huà 得到dé dào dé dào 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 澳大利亚联邦ào dà lì yà lián bāng ào dà lì yà lián bāng 警察jǐng chá jǐng chá 和hé hé ASIOASIO ASIO 在内zài nèi zài nèi 的de de 执法zhí fǎ zhí fǎ 机构jī gòu jī gòu 的de de 支持zhī chí zhī chí ,, , 他们tā men tā men 在zài zài 证词zhèng cí zhèng cí 中zhōng zhōng 说明shuō míng shuō míng 该gāi gāi 计划jì huà jì huà 对duì duì 调查diào chá diào chá 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 犯罪fàn zuì fàn zuì 和hé hé 恐怖主义kǒng bù zhǔ yì kǒng bù zhǔ yì 的de de 重要性zhòng yào xìng zhòng yào xìng [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
The Commonwealth Ombudsman was also given new oversight powers [3]. **Claim: "Cost of about $100 per customer per year"** No evidence was found to support this specific cost figure.
** * ** * 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng :: : "" " 访问fǎng wèn fǎng wèn 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 数据shù jù shù jù 不bù bù 需要xū yào xū yào 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng "" " ** * ** *
The claim provides no source for this $100 per customer estimate.
这zhè zhè 在zài zài 部分bù fèn bù fèn 上shàng shàng 是shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de ,, , 但dàn dàn 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng 。。 。
While implementation costs were discussed, this specific figure appears unsubstantiated. **Claim: "Will be used to punish illegal downloaders"** There is no evidence that the metadata retention scheme was used for copyright enforcement against illegal downloaders.
虽然suī rán suī rán 访问fǎng wèn fǎng wèn 一般yì bān yì bān 元yuán yuán 数据shù jù shù jù 不bù bù 需要xū yào xū yào 司法sī fǎ sī fǎ 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng ,, , 但dàn dàn 访问fǎng wèn fǎng wèn 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 无wú wú 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 。。 。
The 2015 Dallas Buyers Club copyright case, where Voltage Pictures sought customer details from ISPs for alleged copyright infringement, operated under different legal mechanisms (pre-existing court discovery processes), not the metadata retention scheme [5].
该gāi gāi 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 将jiāng jiāng 无需wú xū wú xū 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng 即可jí kě jí kě 访问fǎng wèn fǎng wèn 元yuán yuán 数据shù jù shù jù 的de de 机构jī gòu jī gòu 数量shù liàng shù liàng 从cóng cóng 大约dà yuē dà yuē 8080 80 个gè gè 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 到dào dào 约yuē yuē 2020 20 个gè gè 指定zhǐ dìng zhǐ dìng 机构jī gòu jī gòu ,, , 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò ASIOASIO ASIO 、、 、 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 和hé hé 州zhōu zhōu 警察jǐng chá jǐng chá 、、 、 州zhōu zhōu 反腐fǎn fǔ fǎn fǔ 机构jī gòu jī gòu 、、 、 税务局shuì wù jú shuì wù jú (( ( ATOATO ATO )) ) 、、 、 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 竞争jìng zhēng jìng zhēng 与yǔ yǔ 消费者xiāo fèi zhě xiāo fèi zhě 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì (( ( ACCCACCC ACCC )) ) 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 证券zhèng quàn zhèng quàn 和hé hé 投资tóu zī tóu zī 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì (( ( ASICASIC ASIC )) ) [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
The scheme was explicitly limited to "serious criminal and national security investigations" [2].
此外cǐ wài cǐ wài ,, , 访问fǎng wèn fǎng wèn 记者jì zhě jì zhě 元yuán yuán 数据shù jù shù jù 以yǐ yǐ 识别shí bié shí bié 信息xìn xī xìn xī 来源lái yuán lái yuán 特别tè bié tè bié 需要xū yào xū yào 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
联邦lián bāng lián bāng 监察jiān chá jiān chá 专员zhuān yuán zhuān yuán 也yě yě 获得huò dé huò dé 了le le 新xīn xīn 的de de 监督jiān dū jiān dū 权力quán lì quán lì [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng :: : "" " 成本chéng běn chéng běn 约yuē yuē 为wèi wèi 每位měi wèi měi wèi 客户kè hù kè hù 每年měi nián měi nián 100100 100 美元měi yuán měi yuán "" " ** * ** *
没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 找到zhǎo dào zhǎo dào 支持zhī chí zhī chí 这一zhè yī zhè yī 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 成本chéng běn chéng běn 数字shù zì shù zì 的de de 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 。。 。
该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 为此wèi cǐ wèi cǐ 100100 100 美元měi yuán měi yuán 估算gū suàn gū suàn 提供tí gōng tí gōng 来源lái yuán lái yuán 。。 。
虽然suī rán suī rán 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn 过guò guò 实施shí shī shí shī 成本chéng běn chéng běn ,, , 但dàn dàn 这个zhè ge zhè ge 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 数字shù zì shù zì 似乎sì hū sì hū 是shì shì 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 依据yī jù yī jù 的de de 。。 。
** * ** * 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng :: : "" " 将jiāng jiāng 用于yòng yú yòng yú 惩罚chéng fá chéng fá 非法fēi fǎ fēi fǎ 下载者xià zài zhě xià zài zhě "" " ** * ** *
没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 元yuán yuán 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 计划jì huà jì huà 被bèi bèi 用于yòng yú yòng yú 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 非法fēi fǎ fēi fǎ 下载者xià zài zhě xià zài zhě 的de de 版权bǎn quán bǎn quán 执法zhí fǎ zhí fǎ 。。 。
20152015 2015 年nián nián 《《 《 达拉斯dá lā sī dá lā sī 买家mǎi jiā mǎi jiā 俱乐部jù lè bù jù lè bù 》》 》 版权bǎn quán bǎn quán 案中àn zhōng àn zhōng ,, , VoltageVoltage Voltage PicturesPictures Pictures 根据gēn jù gēn jù 现有xiàn yǒu xiàn yǒu 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 披露pī lù pī lù 程序chéng xù chéng xù (( ( 而ér ér 非元fēi yuán fēi yuán 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 计划jì huà jì huà )) ) 向xiàng xiàng ISPISP ISP 索取suǒ qǔ suǒ qǔ 涉嫌shè xián shè xián 侵权qīn quán qīn quán 客户kè hù kè hù 信息xìn xī xìn xī [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
该gāi gāi 计划jì huà jì huà 明确míng què míng què 限于xiàn yú xiàn yú "" " 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 刑事xíng shì xíng shì 和hé hé 国家guó jiā guó jiā 安全ān quán ān quán 调查diào chá diào chá "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。

缺失背景

该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 信息xìn xī xìn xī :: :
The claim omits several critical pieces of context: **Bipartisan Support**: The legislation passed with bipartisan support from the Labor opposition after amendments were agreed to [1][6].
** * ** * 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 支持zhī chí zhī chí ** * ** * :: : 该gāi gāi 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 在zài zài 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 支持zhī chí zhī chí 下xià xià 通过tōng guò tōng guò ,, , LaborLabor Labor 反对党fǎn duì dǎng fǎn duì dǎng 在zài zài 修正案xiū zhèng àn xiū zhèng àn 达成dá chéng dá chéng 一致yí zhì yí zhì 后hòu hòu 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 支持zhī chí zhī chí [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
This was not a purely Coalition initiative - the major opposition party supported it. **Labor's Previous Proposals**: The Gillard Labor government had previously proposed similar data retention laws in 2012 as part of national security reforms [7][8].
这zhè zhè 不是bú shì bú shì 纯粹chún cuì chún cuì 的de de CoalitionCoalition Coalition 倡议chàng yì chàng yì —— — —— — 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 反对党fǎn duì dǎng fǎn duì dǎng 也yě yě 支持zhī chí zhī chí 。。 。
The Coalition scheme was not unprecedented - it built upon proposals Labor itself had put forward. **Target of the Legislation**: Brandis explicitly stated: "The target and object of this legislation are terrorists, organised criminals and paedophiles" [3].
** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 先前xiān qián xiān qián 的de de 提议tí yì tí yì ** * ** * :: : GillardGillard Gillard LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 此前cǐ qián cǐ qián 在zài zài 20122012 2012 年nián nián 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 国家guó jiā guó jiā 安全ān quán ān quán 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 的de de 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn 提出tí chū tí chū 了le le 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 法fǎ fǎ [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。 。
The scheme was intended for serious criminal investigations, not routine surveillance. **Data Type Limitations**: The scheme requires retention of metadata (communication records, timestamps, locations) - NOT content of communications [2].
CoalitionCoalition Coalition 的de de 计划jì huà jì huà 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 史无前例shǐ wú qián lì shǐ wú qián lì —— — —— — 它tā tā 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì 在zài zài LaborLabor Labor 自己zì jǐ zì jǐ 提出tí chū tí chū 的de de 提议tí yì tí yì 之上zhī shàng zhī shàng 。。 。
This is a significant distinction the claim fails to make. **Reduction in Access**: Rather than expanding surveillance powers, the legislation actually reduced the number of agencies that could access metadata without warrant from approximately 80 to about 20 [3].
** * ** * 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 目标mù biāo mù biāo ** * ** * :: : BrandisBrandis Brandis 明确míng què míng què 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì :: : "" " 这项zhè xiàng zhè xiàng 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 的de de 目标mù biāo mù biāo 和hé hé 对象duì xiàng duì xiàng 是shì shì 恐怖分子kǒng bù fèn zi kǒng bù fèn zi 、、 、 有yǒu yǒu 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 犯罪分子fàn zuì fèn zǐ fàn zuì fèn zǐ 和hé hé 恋童liàn tóng liàn tóng 癖者pǐ zhě pǐ zhě "" " [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
该gāi gāi 计划jì huà jì huà 旨在zhǐ zài zhǐ zài 用于yòng yú yòng yú 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 刑事xíng shì xíng shì 调查diào chá diào chá ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 日常rì cháng rì cháng 监控jiān kòng jiān kòng 。。 。
** * ** * 数据类型shù jù lèi xíng shù jù lèi xíng 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì ** * ** * :: : 该gāi gāi 计划jì huà jì huà 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 元yuán yuán 数据shù jù shù jù (( ( 通信tōng xìn tōng xìn 记录jì lù jì lù 、、 、 时间shí jiān shí jiān 戳chuō chuō 、、 、 位置wèi zhì wèi zhì )) ) —— — —— — 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 通信tōng xìn tōng xìn 内容nèi róng nèi róng [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
这zhè zhè 是shì shì 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 未能wèi néng wèi néng 说明shuō míng shuō míng 的de de 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 区别qū bié qū bié 。。 。
** * ** * 访问fǎng wèn fǎng wèn 权限quán xiàn quán xiàn 的de de 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo ** * ** * :: : 与yǔ yǔ 扩大kuò dà kuò dà 监控jiān kòng jiān kòng 权力quán lì quán lì 相反xiāng fǎn xiāng fǎn ,, , 该gāi gāi 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 将jiāng jiāng 无需wú xū wú xū 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng 即可jí kě jí kě 访问fǎng wèn fǎng wèn 元yuán yuán 数据shù jù shù jù 的de de 机构jī gòu jī gòu 数量shù liàng shù liàng 从cóng cóng 约yuē yuē 8080 80 个gè gè 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 到dào dào 约yuē yuē 2020 20 个gè gè [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。

来源可信度评估

原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò :: :
The original sources include: 1. **Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF)**: A US-based digital rights advocacy organization.
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 电子diàn zi diàn zi 前沿qián yán qián yán 基金会jī jīn huì jī jīn huì (( ( EFFEFF EFF )) ) ** * ** * :: : 一家yī jiā yī jiā 总部zǒng bù zǒng bù 位于wèi yú wèi yú 美国měi guó měi guó 的de de 数字shù zì shù zì 权利quán lì quán lì 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 。。 。
The EFF is a nonprofit advocacy group with a clear pro-privacy, anti-surveillance stance [9].
EFFEFF EFF 是shì shì 一家yī jiā yī jiā 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 明确míng què míng què 亲qīn qīn 隐私yǐn sī yǐn sī 、、 、 反fǎn fǎn 监控jiān kòng jiān kòng 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 的de de 非营利fēi yíng lì fēi yíng lì 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī [[ [ 99 9 ]] ] 。。 。
While they provide valuable civil liberties perspectives, they are an advocacy organization rather than a neutral fact-checking source.
虽然suī rán suī rán 他们tā men tā men 提供tí gōng tí gōng 有yǒu yǒu 价值jià zhí jià zhí 的de de 公民自由gōng mín zì yóu gōng mín zì yóu 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn ,, , 但dàn dàn 他们tā men tā men 是shì shì 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 中立zhōng lì zhōng lì 的de de 事实shì shí shì shí 核查hé chá hé chá 来源lái yuán lái yuán 。。 。
Their article "Why Metadata Matters" discusses general privacy concerns about metadata but does not specifically address the Australian legislation's details. 2. **SBS News**: A mainstream Australian public broadcaster.
他们tā men tā men 的de de 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 《《 《 为什么wèi shén me wèi shén me 元yuán yuán 数据shù jù shù jù 很hěn hěn 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 》》 》 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn 了le le 一般yì bān yì bān 的de de 元yuán yuán 数据shù jù shù jù 隐私yǐn sī yǐn sī 问题wèn tí wèn tí ,, , 但dàn dàn 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 涉及shè jí shè jí 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 的de de 细节xì jié xì jié 。。 。
This is a credible, mainstream news source.
22 2 .. . ** * ** * SBSSBS SBS 新闻xīn wén xīn wén ** * ** * :: : 一家yī jiā yī jiā 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 公共广播gōng gòng guǎng bō gōng gòng guǎng bō 机构jī gòu jī gòu 。。 。
The article cited actually contradicts the claim's framing - showing Brandis said journalist protection changes were "not necessary," not the entire scheme. 3. **aph.gov.au**: Official parliamentary website - authoritative government source. 4. **YouTube**: No specific video identified - unverifiable.
这是zhè shì zhè shì 一个yí gè yí gè 可信kě xìn kě xìn 的de de 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 新闻来源xīn wén lái yuán xīn wén lái yuán 。。 。
The claim appears to selectively quote and potentially misrepresent the SBS News source, which clearly shows Brandis was referring to specific journalist protection amendments as "not necessary," not the entire data retention scheme.
引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 的de de 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 与yǔ yǔ 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 的de de 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 相xiāng xiāng 矛盾máo dùn máo dùn —— — —— — 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì BrandisBrandis Brandis 说shuō shuō 的de de 是shì shì 记者jì zhě jì zhě 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi "" " 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 必要bì yào bì yào "" " ,, , 而ér ér 不是bú shì bú shì 整个zhěng gè zhěng gè 计划jì huà jì huà 。。 。
33 3 .. . ** * ** * aphaph aph .. . govgov gov .. . auau au ** * ** * :: : 官方guān fāng guān fāng 议会yì huì yì huì 网站wǎng zhàn wǎng zhàn —— — —— — 权威quán wēi quán wēi 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 来源lái yuán lái yuán 。。 。
44 4 .. . ** * ** * YouTubeYouTube YouTube ** * ** * :: : 未确定wèi què dìng wèi què dìng 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 视频shì pín shì pín —— — —— — 无法wú fǎ wú fǎ 核实hé shí hé shí 。。 。
该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 似乎sì hū sì hū 有yǒu yǒu 选择性xuǎn zé xìng xuǎn zé xìng 地dì dì 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng ,, , 并bìng bìng 可能kě néng kě néng 歪曲wāi qū wāi qū 了le le SBSSBS SBS 新闻来源xīn wén lái yuán xīn wén lái yuán ,, , 后者hòu zhě hòu zhě 清楚qīng chǔ qīng chǔ 地dì dì 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì BrandisBrandis Brandis 指zhǐ zhǐ 的de de 是shì shì 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 记者jì zhě jì zhě 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi "" " 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 必要bì yào bì yào "" " ,, , 而ér ér 不是bú shì bú shì 整个zhěng gè zhěng gè 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 计划jì huà jì huà 。。 。
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做过zuò guò zuò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng ?? ?
**Did Labor do something similar?** Search conducted: "Labor government data retention proposal 2012" Finding: Yes.
** * ** *
The Gillard Labor government proposed similar data retention laws in 2012 as part of national security reforms [7][8].
搜索sōu suǒ sōu suǒ :: : "" " LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 提议tí yì tí yì 20122012 2012 "" "
In July 2012, the Labor government put forward proposals for sweeping internet surveillance that would require retention of online activity data [8].
发现fā xiàn fā xiàn :: : 是shì shì 的de de 。。 。
Parliamentary records from 2012 show both Labor and Coalition avoided debating the specific data retention proposals, with the Greens being the only party prepared to debate the issue openly [7]. **Comparison**: Both parties have supported metadata retention schemes.
GillardGillard Gillard LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 20122012 2012 年nián nián 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 国家guó jiā guó jiā 安全ān quán ān quán 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 的de de 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn 提出tí chū tí chū 了le le 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 法fǎ fǎ [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。 。
The Coalition's 2015 legislation received bipartisan Labor support, indicating cross-party consensus on national security grounds.
20122012 2012 年nián nián 77 7 月yuè yuè ,, , LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 提出tí chū tí chū 了le le 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 互联网hù lián wǎng hù lián wǎng 监控jiān kòng jiān kòng 提议tí yì tí yì ,, , 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 在线zài xiàn zài xiàn 活动huó dòng huó dòng 数据shù jù shù jù [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。 。
Labor's 2012 proposals were arguably more concerning from a privacy perspective as they contemplated retaining "everything that Australians do on-line" [8], whereas the Coalition's 2015 scheme was more narrowly defined.
20122012 2012 年nián nián 议会yì huì yì huì 记录jì lù jì lù 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì ,, , LaborLabor Labor 和hé hé CoalitionCoalition Coalition 都dōu dōu 避免bì miǎn bì miǎn 就jiù jiù 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 的de de 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 提议tí yì tí yì 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 辩论biàn lùn biàn lùn ,, , 只有zhǐ yǒu zhǐ yǒu GreensGreens Greens 愿意yuàn yì yuàn yì 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 辩论biàn lùn biàn lùn 这一zhè yī zhè yī 问题wèn tí wèn tí [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào ** * ** * :: : 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 都dōu dōu 支持zhī chí zhī chí 元yuán yuán 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 计划jì huà jì huà 。。 。
CoalitionCoalition Coalition 的de de 20152015 2015 年nián nián 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 获得huò dé huò dé LaborLabor Labor 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 支持zhī chí zhī chí ,, , 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 在zài zài 国家guó jiā guó jiā 安全ān quán ān quán 问题wèn tí wèn tí 上shàng shàng 存在cún zài cún zài 跨kuà kuà 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 共识gòng shí gòng shí 。。 。
LaborLabor Labor 20122012 2012 年nián nián 的de de 提议tí yì tí yì 从cóng cóng 隐私yǐn sī yǐn sī 角度看jiǎo dù kàn jiǎo dù kàn 更gèng gèng 令人担忧lìng rén dān yōu lìng rén dān yōu ,, , 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi 考虑kǎo lǜ kǎo lǜ 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú "" " 澳大利亚人ào dà lì yà rén ào dà lì yà rén 在线zài xiàn zài xiàn 所suǒ suǒ 做zuò zuò 的de de 一切yī qiè yī qiè "" " [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] ,, , 而ér ér CoalitionCoalition Coalition 20152015 2015 年nián nián 的de de 计划jì huà jì huà 定义dìng yì dìng yì 更为gèng wéi gèng wéi 狭窄xiá zhǎi xiá zhǎi 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

元yuán yuán 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 计划jì huà jì huà 存在cún zài cún zài 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì ,, , 面临miàn lín miàn lín 来自lái zì lái zì 民权mín quán mín quán 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 、、 、 GreensGreens Greens 和hé hé 一些yī xiē yī xiē 独立dú lì dú lì 议员yì yuán yì yuán 的de de 大量dà liàng dà liàng 批评pī píng pī píng 。。 。
The metadata retention scheme was controversial and faced significant criticism from civil liberties groups, the Greens, and some crossbenchers.
这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 批评pī píng pī píng 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò :: :
These criticisms included: - Privacy concerns about mass surveillance - Questions about effectiveness for law enforcement - Potential for "function creep" (expanding uses beyond original intent) - Costs imposed on ISPs and potentially consumers However, the full story includes: **Legitimate Security Rationale**: The legislation was recommended by the bipartisan Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security [4].
-- - 对duì duì 大规模dà guī mó dà guī mó 监控jiān kòng jiān kòng 的de de 隐私yǐn sī yǐn sī 担忧dān yōu dān yōu
Law enforcement agencies testified that metadata was essential for investigating terrorism, organized crime, and child exploitation [2]. **Oversight Mechanisms**: The scheme included oversight through the Commonwealth Ombudsman, reduction in accessing agencies (80→20), and warrant requirements for journalist source identification [3]. **Bipartisan Consensus**: The legislation passed with Labor support after amendments [6].
-- - 对duì duì 执法zhí fǎ zhí fǎ 有效性yǒu xiào xìng yǒu xiào xìng 的de de 质疑zhì yí zhì yí
This indicates the security concerns were not merely Coalition scaremongering but shared across the major parties. **Historical Precedent**: Labor had previously proposed similar measures in 2012 [7][8], demonstrating this was not a Coalition-specific overreach but a continuation of bipartisan national security policy development. **Not Unique to Coalition**: Multiple Western democracies have implemented similar data retention regimes.
-- - "" " 功能gōng néng gōng néng 蔓延màn yán màn yán "" " (( ( 用途yòng tú yòng tú 超出chāo chū chāo chū 原定yuán dìng yuán dìng 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi )) ) 的de de 可能性kě néng xìng kě néng xìng
The claim presents this as a Coalition-specific overreach when it actually represents broader Western security policy trends that both major Australian parties have supported.
-- - 对duì duì ISPISP ISP 和hé hé 可能kě néng kě néng 消费者xiāo fèi zhě xiāo fèi zhě 的de de 成本chéng běn chéng běn 负担fù dān fù dān
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 完整wán zhěng wán zhěng 的de de 故事gù shì gù shì 还hái hái 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò :: :
** * ** * 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 的de de 安全ān quán ān quán 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu ** * ** * :: : 该gāi gāi 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 由yóu yóu 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 议会yì huì yì huì 联合lián hé lián hé 情报qíng bào qíng bào 与yǔ yǔ 安全ān quán ān quán 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 推荐tuī jiàn tuī jiàn [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
执法zhí fǎ zhí fǎ 机构jī gòu jī gòu 在zài zài 证词zhèng cí zhèng cí 中zhōng zhōng 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì ,, , 元yuán yuán 数据shù jù shù jù 对duì duì 调查diào chá diào chá 恐怖主义kǒng bù zhǔ yì kǒng bù zhǔ yì 、、 、 有yǒu yǒu 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 犯罪fàn zuì fàn zuì 和hé hé 儿童ér tóng ér tóng 剥削bō xuē bō xuē 至关重要zhì guān zhòng yào zhì guān zhòng yào [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 监督机制jiān dū jī zhì jiān dū jī zhì ** * ** * :: : 该gāi gāi 计划jì huà jì huà 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 监察jiān chá jiān chá 专员zhuān yuán zhuān yuán 的de de 监督jiān dū jiān dū 、、 、 访问fǎng wèn fǎng wèn 机构jī gòu jī gòu 数量shù liàng shù liàng 的de de 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo (( ( 8080 80 →→ → 2020 20 )) ) ,, , 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 记者jì zhě jì zhě 信息xìn xī xìn xī 来源lái yuán lái yuán 识别shí bié shí bié 的de de 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 共识gòng shí gòng shí ** * ** * :: : 该gāi gāi 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 在zài zài LaborLabor Labor 支持zhī chí zhī chí 下xià xià 通过tōng guò tōng guò [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 安全ān quán ān quán 担忧dān yōu dān yōu 不仅仅bù jǐn jǐn bù jǐn jǐn 是shì shì CoalitionCoalition Coalition 的de de 危言耸听wēi yán sǒng tīng wēi yán sǒng tīng ,, , 而是ér shì ér shì 两大liǎng dà liǎng dà 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 共同gòng tóng gòng tóng 关注guān zhù guān zhù 的de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí 。。 。
** * ** * 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ 先例xiān lì xiān lì ** * ** * :: : LaborLabor Labor 此前cǐ qián cǐ qián 在zài zài 20122012 2012 年nián nián 提出tí chū tí chū 了le le 类似lèi sì lèi sì 措施cuò shī cuò shī [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] ,, , 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 这zhè zhè 不是bú shì bú shì CoalitionCoalition Coalition 特有tè yǒu tè yǒu 的de de 过度guò dù guò dù 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi ,, , 而是ér shì ér shì 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 国家guó jiā guó jiā 安全ān quán ān quán 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 发展fā zhǎn fā zhǎn 的de de 延续yán xù yán xù 。。 。
** * ** * 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu ** * ** * :: : 多个duō gè duō gè 西方xī fāng xī fāng 民主mín zhǔ mín zhǔ 国家guó jiā guó jiā 实施shí shī shí shī 了le le 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 制度zhì dù zhì dù 。。 。
该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 将jiāng jiāng 此cǐ cǐ 呈现chéng xiàn chéng xiàn 为wèi wèi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 特有tè yǒu tè yǒu 的de de 过度guò dù guò dù 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi ,, , 而ér ér 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 它tā tā 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 了le le 两大liǎng dà liǎng dà 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 都dōu dōu 支持zhī chí zhī chí 的de de 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 西方xī fāng xī fāng 安全ān quán ān quán 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 趋势qū shì qū shì 。。 。

具有误导性

4.0

/ 10

该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 包含bāo hán bāo hán 多个duō gè duō gè 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 歪曲wāi qū wāi qū :: :
The claim contains multiple significant misrepresentations: 1. **Cherry-picked and misrepresented quote**: Brandis saying journalist protection changes were "not necessary" is presented as him admitting the entire scheme was unnecessary.
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 断章取义duàn zhāng qǔ yì duàn zhāng qǔ yì 和hé hé 歪曲wāi qū wāi qū 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng ** * ** * :: : BrandisBrandis Brandis 说shuō shuō 记者jì zhě jì zhě 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi "" " 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 必要bì yào bì yào "" " 被bèi bèi 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 为wèi wèi 他tā tā 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn 整个zhěng gè zhěng gè 计划jì huà jì huà 都dōu dōu 不必要bù bì yào bù bì yào 。。 。
This is false - he explicitly supported the scheme's core purpose. 2. **Unsubstantiated cost claim**: The $100 per customer figure appears fabricated - no source is provided and no evidence supports this specific amount. 3. **False copyright claim**: No evidence shows the scheme was used to "punish illegal downloaders." The Dallas Buyers Club case used different legal mechanisms. 4. **Omitted bipartisan context**: The claim presents this as purely Coalition policy when Labor both supported the 2015 bill AND had proposed similar laws in 2012. 5. **Selective warrant framing**: While technically true that general access doesn't require warrants, the claim omits that warrants ARE required for journalist sources and that the number of accessing agencies was significantly reduced.
这是zhè shì zhè shì 错误cuò wù cuò wù 的de de —— — —— — 他tā tā 明确míng què míng què 支持zhī chí zhī chí 该gāi gāi 计划jì huà jì huà 的de de 核心hé xīn hé xīn 目的mù dì mù dì 。。 。
The claim uses partial truths, misrepresented quotes, and omitted context to present a one-sided negative portrayal of a bipartisan national security measure that both major parties have supported.
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 未经wèi jīng wèi jīng 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí 的de de 成本chéng běn chéng běn 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng ** * ** * :: : 每位měi wèi měi wèi 客户kè hù kè hù 100100 100 美元měi yuán měi yuán 的de de 成本chéng běn chéng běn 数字shù zì shù zì 似乎sì hū sì hū 是shì shì 编造biān zào biān zào 的de de —— — —— — 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 提供tí gōng tí gōng 来源lái yuán lái yuán ,, , 也yě yě 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 支持zhī chí zhī chí 这一zhè yī zhè yī 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 金额jīn é jīn é 。。 。
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 虚假xū jiǎ xū jiǎ 的de de 版权bǎn quán bǎn quán 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng ** * ** * :: : 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 该gāi gāi 计划jì huà jì huà 被bèi bèi 用于yòng yú yòng yú "" " 惩罚chéng fá chéng fá 非法fēi fǎ fēi fǎ 下载者xià zài zhě xià zài zhě "" " 。。 。
《《 《 达拉斯dá lā sī dá lā sī 买家mǎi jiā mǎi jiā 俱乐部jù lè bù jù lè bù 》》 》 案àn àn 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 的de de 是shì shì 不同bù tóng bù tóng 的de de 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 机制jī zhì jī zhì 。。 。
44 4 .. . ** * ** * 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ** * ** * :: : 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 将jiāng jiāng 此cǐ cǐ 呈现chéng xiàn chéng xiàn 为wèi wèi 纯粹chún cuì chún cuì 的de de CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè ,, , 而ér ér LaborLabor Labor 既jì jì 支持zhī chí zhī chí 了le le 20152015 2015 年nián nián 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn ,, , 又yòu yòu 在zài zài 20122012 2012 年nián nián 提出tí chū tí chū 了le le 类似lèi sì lèi sì 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 。。 。
55 5 .. . ** * ** * 选择性xuǎn zé xìng xuǎn zé xìng 的de de 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù ** * ** * :: : 虽然suī rán suī rán 在技术上zài jì shù shàng zài jì shù shàng 访问fǎng wèn fǎng wèn 一般yì bān yì bān 数据shù jù shù jù 确实què shí què shí 不bù bù 需要xū yào xū yào 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng ,, , 但dàn dàn 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le 访问fǎng wèn fǎng wèn 记者jì zhě jì zhě 信息xìn xī xìn xī 来源lái yuán lái yuán 确实què shí què shí 需要xū yào xū yào 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 令lìng lìng ,, , 且qiě qiě 可kě kě 访问fǎng wèn fǎng wèn 机构jī gòu jī gòu 数量shù liàng shù liàng 大幅dà fú dà fú 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 的de de 事实shì shí shì shí 。。 。
该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 利用lì yòng lì yòng 部分bù fèn bù fèn 真相zhēn xiàng zhēn xiàng 、、 、 歪曲wāi qū wāi qū 的de de 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 和hé hé 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 的de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ,, , 将jiāng jiāng 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 支持zhī chí zhī chí 的de de 国家guó jiā guó jiā 安全措施ān quán cuò shī ān quán cuò shī 呈现chéng xiàn chéng xiàn 为wèi wèi 单方面dān fāng miàn dān fāng miàn 的de de 负面fù miàn fù miàn 描述miáo shù miáo shù ,, , 而ér ér 两大liǎng dà liǎng dà 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 都dōu dōu 支持zhī chí zhī chí 这项zhè xiàng zhè xiàng 措施cuò shī cuò shī 。。 。

📚 来源与引用 (9)

  1. 1
    PDF

    Going against the flow: Australia enacts data retention law

    Austlii Edu • PDF Document
  2. 2
    Data retention obligations

    Data retention obligations

    Home Affairs brings together Australia's federal law enforcement, national and transport security, criminal justice, emergency management, multicultural affairs, settlement services and immigration and border-related functions, working together to keep Australia safe.

    Department of Home Affairs Website
  3. 3
    Data retention change not necessary, Brandis says

    Data retention change not necessary, Brandis says

    Attorney-General George Brandis has dismissed as 'outrageous hyperbole' claims that proposed changes to data retention legislation are still an attack on press freedom.

    SBS News
  4. 4
    Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment (Data Retention) Bill 2014

    Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment (Data Retention) Bill 2014

    Helpful information Text of bill First reading: Text of the bill as introduced into the Parliament Third reading: Prepared if the bill is amended by the house in which it was introduced. This version of the bill is then considered by the second house. As passed by

    Aph Gov
  5. 5
    Dallas Buyers Club and the case of copyright infringement

    Dallas Buyers Club and the case of copyright infringement

    Alderip Com
  6. 6
    Metadata laws pass parliament

    Metadata laws pass parliament

    The government's controversial metadata laws have passed parliament with bipartisan support.

    SBS News
  7. 7
    Labor, Coalition avoid data retention debate

    Labor, Coalition avoid data retention debate

    Australia’s two major sides of politics have avoided substantially discussing the Federal Government’s controversial data retention and surveillance package, in a Senate debate stimulated yesterday by Greens Senator Scott Ludlam, who described the privacy issues involved as “deadly serious”.

    Delimiter
  8. 8
    Be sceptical of vague new 'national security' powers

    Be sceptical of vague new 'national security' powers

    Any proposal by the government to increase its own power should be treated with scepticism. Double that scepticism when the government is vague about why it needs that extra power. Double again when those powers are in the area of law and order. And double again every time the words "national security" are used. So scepticism should be our default position when evaluating the long list of new security powers, including data retention laws, the Federal Government wants.

    Abc Net
  9. 9
    Why Metadata Matters

    Why Metadata Matters

    In response to the recent news reports about the National Security Agency's surveillance program, President Barack Obama said today, "When it comes to telephone calls, nobody is listening to your telephone calls." Instead, the government was just "sifting through this so-called metadata." The...

    Electronic Frontier Foundation

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。