具有误导性

评分: 4.0/10

Coalition
C0665

声明内容

“强迫失业者每月申请40份工作。这将使企业每天收到超过1,000,000份申请。目前大约每10个失业者只有1个职位空缺,因此求职申请数量不足并不是问题。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 包含bāo hán bāo hán 多个duō gè duō gè 需要xū yào xū yào 核实hé shí hé shí 的de de 内容nèi róng nèi róng 要点yào diǎn yào diǎn :: :
The claim contains several elements requiring verification: **The 40 jobs per month proposal:** The Coalition government did announce a plan in July 2014 to require jobseekers to apply for 40 jobs per month as part of its welfare reforms [1][2].
** * ** * 每月měi yuè měi yuè 4040 40 份fèn fèn 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú :: : ** * ** * 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 在zài zài 20142014 2014 年nián nián 77 7 月yuè yuè 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 了le le 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng 计划jì huà jì huà ,, , 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 求职者qiú zhí zhě qiú zhí zhě 每月měi yuè měi yuè 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng 4040 40 份fèn fèn 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò ,, , 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 其qí qí 福利fú lì fú lì 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 的de de 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
Employment Minister Eric Abetz outlined the new rules on July 28, 2014 [3].
就业jiù yè jiù yè 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng EricEric Eric AbetzAbetz Abetz 于yú yú 20142014 2014 年nián nián 77 7 月yuè yuè 2828 28 日rì rì 公布gōng bù gōng bù 了le le 这项zhè xiàng zhè xiàng 新xīn xīn 规定guī dìng guī dìng [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
The existing requirement at that time was 20 jobs per month [1]. **The "1 million applications per day" figure:** This was a projection/calculation published in the Sydney Morning Herald opinion piece, not an actual outcome.
当时dāng shí dāng shí 现有xiàn yǒu xiàn yǒu 的de de 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 是shì shì 每月měi yuè měi yuè 2020 20 份fèn fèn 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The article stated: "About 740,000 Australians are unemployed...
** * ** * "" " 每天měi tiān měi tiān 100100 100 万份wàn fèn wàn fèn 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng "" " 数据shù jù shù jù :: : ** * ** * 这是zhè shì zhè shì 《《 《 悉尼xī ní xī ní 晨锋报chén fēng bào chén fēng bào 》》 》 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 中zhōng zhōng 发表fā biǎo fā biǎo 的de de 预测yù cè yù cè // / 计算结果jì suàn jié guǒ jì suàn jié guǒ ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 实际shí jì shí jì 结果jié guǒ jié guǒ 。。 。
Forcing most to apply for more than one job per day... will see them sending out pro forma emails at a pointless rate" and calculated this would result in "more than 1 million applications per day, every working day of every year" [3].
该gāi gāi 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 称chēng chēng :: : "" " 约yuē yuē 有yǒu yǒu 7474 74 万wàn wàn 澳大利亚人ào dà lì yà rén ào dà lì yà rén 失业shī yè shī yè …… … …… … 强迫qiǎng pò qiǎng pò 大多数dà duō shù dà duō shù 人rén rén 每天měi tiān měi tiān 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng 超过chāo guò chāo guò 一份yī fèn yī fèn 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò …… … …… … 将jiāng jiāng 使shǐ shǐ 他们tā men tā men 以yǐ yǐ 无wú wú 意义yì yì yì yì 的de de 速率sù lǜ sù lǜ 发送fā sòng fā sòng 格式化gé shì huà gé shì huà 的de de 电子邮件diàn zi yóu jiàn diàn zi yóu jiàn "" " ,, , 并bìng bìng 计算jì suàn jì suàn 出chū chū 这zhè zhè 将jiāng jiāng 导致dǎo zhì dǎo zhì "" " 每年měi nián měi nián 每个měi gè měi gè 工作日gōng zuò rì gōng zuò rì 每天měi tiān měi tiān 收到shōu dào shōu dào 超过chāo guò chāo guò 100100 100 万份wàn fèn wàn fèn 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng "" " [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
This was a theoretical projection, not a reported fact. **The 10:1 ratio claim:** The claim states there was "about 1 job availability for every 10 unemployed people." In mid-2014, Australia had approximately 740,000 unemployed people according to the SMH article [3].
这是zhè shì zhè shì 一个yí gè yí gè 理论lǐ lùn lǐ lùn 预测yù cè yù cè ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 报道bào dào bào dào 的de de 事实shì shí shì shí 。。 。
ABS data from late 2014 shows unemployment hit a 12-year high of 6.3% [4].
** * ** * 1010 10 :: : 11 1 比例bǐ lì bǐ lì 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ :: : ** * ** * 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 称chēng chēng "" " 大约dà yuē dà yuē 每měi měi 1010 10 个gè gè 失业者shī yè zhě shī yè zhě 只有zhǐ yǒu zhǐ yǒu 11 1 个gè gè 职位zhí wèi zhí wèi 空缺kòng quē kòng quē "" " 。。 。
The job vacancy to unemployment ratio in Australia has historically fluctuated, and the 10:1 figure appears to be an estimate from the opinion piece rather than official ABS statistics. **Critical fact:** The 40 jobs per month policy was **abandoned** in October 2014, approximately 2.5 months after being proposed [1][2].
根据gēn jù gēn jù 《《 《 悉尼xī ní xī ní 晨锋报chén fēng bào chén fēng bào 》》 》 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng ,, , 20142014 2014 年nián nián 中期zhōng qī zhōng qī 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 约yuē yuē 有yǒu yǒu 7474 74 万人wàn rén wàn rén 失业shī yè shī yè [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
The government backed down after facing opposition from business groups (Business Council of Australia, Council of Small Business of Australia), crossbench senators, and welfare advocates [1][3].
澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 统计局tǒng jì jú tǒng jì jú 20142014 2014 年底nián dǐ nián dǐ 数据shù jù shù jù 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì ,, , 失业率shī yè lǜ shī yè lǜ 创下chuàng xià chuàng xià 6.3%6.3% 6.3% 的de de 1212 12 年nián nián 新高xīn gāo xīn gāo [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
The original 20 jobs per month requirement remained in place [1].
澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 职位zhí wèi zhí wèi 空缺kòng quē kòng quē 与yǔ yǔ 失业人数shī yè rén shù shī yè rén shù 的de de 比例bǐ lì bǐ lì 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ 上shàng shàng 波动bō dòng bō dòng 较大jiào dà jiào dà ,, , 1010 10 :: : 11 1 的de de 数字shù zì shù zì 似乎sì hū sì hū 是shì shì 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 中zhōng zhōng 的de de 估计gū jì gū jì ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 统计局tǒng jì jú tǒng jì jú 的de de 官方guān fāng guān fāng 统计数据tǒng jì shù jù tǒng jì shù jù 。。 。
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 事实shì shí shì shí :: : ** * ** * 每月měi yuè měi yuè 4040 40 份fèn fèn 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 于yú yú 20142014 2014 年nián nián 1010 10 月yuè yuè 被bèi bèi ** * ** * 放弃fàng qì fàng qì ** * ** * ,, , 距离jù lí jù lí 提出tí chū tí chū 仅约jǐn yuē jǐn yuē 2.52.5 2.5 个gè gè 月yuè yuè [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 面对miàn duì miàn duì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 商业shāng yè shāng yè 理事会lǐ shì huì lǐ shì huì 、、 、 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 小企业xiǎo qǐ yè xiǎo qǐ yè 理事会lǐ shì huì lǐ shì huì 、、 、 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 中立zhōng lì zhōng lì 议员yì yuán yì yuán 和hé hé 福利fú lì fú lì 倡导者chàng dǎo zhě chàng dǎo zhě 的de de 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 后hòu hòu 做出zuò chū zuò chū 让步ràng bù ràng bù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
原有yuán yǒu yuán yǒu 的de de 每月měi yuè měi yuè 2020 20 份fèn fèn 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 仍然réng rán réng rán 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。

缺失背景

该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 将jiāng jiāng 每月měi yuè měi yuè 4040 40 份fèn fèn 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 为wèi wèi 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng 已yǐ yǐ 实施shí shī shí shī 的de de "" " 强迫qiǎng pò qiǎng pò "" " 失业者shī yè zhě shī yè zhě 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè ,, , 而ér ér 实际shí jì shí jì 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 是shì shì :: :
The claim presents the 40 jobs per month requirement as implemented policy that "forced" unemployed people, when in reality: 1. **The policy was never fully implemented** - It was announced in July 2014 and abandoned by October 2014 before taking effect [1][2]. 2. **The government responded to criticism** - The Coalition backed down after legitimate concerns were raised by business groups about being "inundated" with applications [3].
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 从未cóng wèi cóng wèi 完全wán quán wán quán 实施shí shī shí shī ** * ** * -- - 它于tā yú tā yú 20142014 2014 年nián nián 77 7 月yuè yuè 宣布xuān bù xuān bù ,, , 20142014 2014 年nián nián 1010 10 月yuè yuè 放弃fàng qì fàng qì ,, , 生效shēng xiào shēng xiào 前qián qián 即jí jí 被bèi bèi 搁置gē zhì gē zhì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
Peter Strong of the Council of Small Business stated: "It's an embarrassment for everybody and it's going to make people angry" [3]. 3. **Business community was divided** - While some business groups criticized the volume of applications, the Business Council of Australia acknowledged "many aspects of the new model are welcome" [3]. 4. **The policy was part of broader "earn or learn" welfare reforms** - The 40 jobs requirement was one element of a larger welfare overhaul announced in the 2014 budget that included work-for-the-dole requirements and changes to Youth Allowance [5]. 5. **The timeframe matters** - The claim uses future tense ("will bombard") from July 2014 articles predicting consequences, but these predictions never materialized because the policy was abandoned before implementation.
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 对duì duì 批评pī píng pī píng 做出zuò chū zuò chū 回应huí yìng huí yìng ** * ** * -- - 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 在zài zài 合法hé fǎ hé fǎ 关切guān qiè guān qiè 被bèi bèi 提出tí chū tí chū 后hòu hòu 让步ràng bù ràng bù ,, , 商业shāng yè shāng yè 团体tuán tǐ tuán tǐ 担心dān xīn dān xīn 会huì huì 被bèi bèi 求职qiú zhí qiú zhí 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng "" " 淹没yān mò yān mò "" " [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 小企业xiǎo qǐ yè xiǎo qǐ yè 理事会lǐ shì huì lǐ shì huì PeterPeter Peter StrongStrong Strong 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì :: : "" " 这zhè zhè 对duì duì 所有人suǒ yǒu rén suǒ yǒu rén 来说lái shuō lái shuō 都dōu dōu 是shì shì 尴尬gān gà gān gà 的de de ,, , 会huì huì 让ràng ràng 人们rén men rén men 愤怒fèn nù fèn nù "" " [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 商业界shāng yè jiè shāng yè jiè 意见分歧yì jiàn fēn qí yì jiàn fēn qí ** * ** * -- - 虽然suī rán suī rán 一些yī xiē yī xiē 商业shāng yè shāng yè 团体tuán tǐ tuán tǐ 批评pī píng pī píng 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng 数量shù liàng shù liàng 过多guò duō guò duō ,, , 但dàn dàn 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 商业shāng yè shāng yè 理事会lǐ shì huì lǐ shì huì 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn "" " 新xīn xīn 模式mó shì mó shì 的de de 许多xǔ duō xǔ duō 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 是shì shì 值得zhí de zhí de 欢迎huān yíng huān yíng 的de de "" " [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
44 4 .. . ** * ** * 该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 是shì shì 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de "" " 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 即jí jí 学习xué xí xué xí "" " 福利fú lì fú lì 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 的de de 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn ** * ** * -- - 4040 40 份fèn fèn 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 是shì shì 20142014 2014 年nián nián 预算yù suàn yù suàn 中zhōng zhōng 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 的de de 更gèng gèng 大规模dà guī mó dà guī mó 福利fú lì fú lì 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 的de de 一个yí gè yí gè 要素yào sù yào sù ,, , 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 换huàn huàn 福利fú lì fú lì 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 和hé hé 青年qīng nián qīng nián 津贴jīn tiē jīn tiē 变更biàn gēng biàn gēng [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
55 5 .. . ** * ** * 时间shí jiān shí jiān 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 很hěn hěn 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào ** * ** * -- - 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 了le le 20142014 2014 年nián nián 77 7 月yuè yuè 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 中zhōng zhōng 预测yù cè yù cè 后果hòu guǒ hòu guǒ 的de de 未来wèi lái wèi lái 时态shí tài shí tài (( ( "" " 将jiāng jiāng 淹没yān mò yān mò "" " )) ) ,, , 但dàn dàn 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 预测yù cè yù cè 从未cóng wèi cóng wèi 实现shí xiàn shí xiàn ,, , 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi 该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 在zài zài 实施shí shī shí shī 前qián qián 就jiù jiù 被bèi bèi 放弃fàng qì fàng qì 了le le 。。 。

来源可信度评估

** * ** * 《《 《 悉尼xī ní xī ní 晨锋报chén fēng bào chén fēng bào 》》 》 (( ( SMHSMH SMH )) ) :: : ** * ** * 第一个dì yí gè dì yí gè 来源lái yuán lái yuán 是shì shì PeterPeter Peter MartinMartin Martin 撰写zhuàn xiě zhuàn xiě 的de de 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn 专栏zhuān lán zhuān lán ,, , 他tā tā 当时dāng shí dāng shí 是shì shì 《《 《 时代shí dài shí dài 报bào bào 》》 》 (( ( FairfaxFairfax Fairfax MediaMedia Media )) ) 的de de 经济学jīng jì xué jīng jì xué 编辑biān jí biān jí 。。 。
**Sydney Morning Herald (SMH):** The first source is an opinion column by Peter Martin, then economics editor of The Age (Fairfax Media).
FairfaxFairfax Fairfax 出版物chū bǎn wù chū bǎn wù 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 持中chí zhōng chí zhōng 左翼zuǒ yì zuǒ yì 编辑biān jí biān jí 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 。。 。
Fairfax publications generally have a center-left editorial stance.
PeterPeter Peter MartinMartin Martin 曾任céng rèn céng rèn 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 财政部cái zhèng bù cái zhèng bù 官员guān yuán guān yuán 和hé hé 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 国立大学guó lì dà xué guó lì dà xué 访问学者fǎng wèn xué zhě fǎng wèn xué zhě ,, , 具备jù bèi jù bèi 经济jīng jì jīng jì 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 专业知识zhuān yè zhī shí zhuān yè zhī shí [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
Peter Martin is a former Commonwealth Treasury official and visiting fellow at ANU, giving him economic policy expertise [3].
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 这zhè zhè 明确míng què míng què 是shì shì 一篇yī piān yī piān 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng ,, , 而ér ér 非纯fēi chún fēi chún 新闻报道xīn wén bào dào xīn wén bào dào 。。 。
However, this was explicitly an opinion piece, not straight news reporting. **SBS News:** The second source is labeled as "Comment" - an opinion piece.
** * ** * SBSSBS SBS 新闻xīn wén xīn wén :: : ** * ** * 第二个dì èr gè dì èr gè 来源lái yuán lái yuán 标注biāo zhù biāo zhù 为wèi wèi "" " 评论píng lùn píng lùn "" " —— — —— — 一篇yī piān yī piān 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 。。 。
SBS (Special Broadcasting Service) is Australia's publicly funded multicultural broadcaster, established by statute with a mandate for diversity.
SBSSBS SBS (( ( 特别tè bié tè bié 广播guǎng bō guǎng bō 服务fú wù fú wù )) ) 是shì shì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 公共gōng gòng gōng gòng 资助zī zhù zī zhù 的de de 多元duō yuán duō yuán 文化wén huà wén huà 广播guǎng bō guǎng bō 机构jī gòu jī gòu ,, , 依法yī fǎ yī fǎ 成立chéng lì chéng lì ,, , 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 多样性duō yàng xìng duō yàng xìng 使命shǐ mìng shǐ mìng 。。 。
While publicly funded, SBS operates independently with its own charter [6]. **Assessment:** Both sources are opinion/commentary pieces, not objective news reporting.
虽然suī rán suī rán 接受jiē shòu jiē shòu 公共gōng gòng gōng gòng 资助zī zhù zī zhù ,, , 但dàn dàn SBSSBS SBS 依据yī jù yī jù 自身zì shēn zì shēn 章程zhāng chéng zhāng chéng 独立dú lì dú lì 运作yùn zuò yùn zuò [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
They reflect legitimate criticism of a controversial policy proposal, but readers should recognize these are perspectives rather than neutral factual accounts.
** * ** * 评估píng gū píng gū :: : ** * ** * 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 来源lái yuán lái yuán 都dōu dōu 是shì shì 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn // / 评论píng lùn píng lùn 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 客观kè guān kè guān 新闻报道xīn wén bào dào xīn wén bào dào 。。 。
它们tā men tā men 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 了le le 对duì duì 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng 有yǒu yǒu 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 提案tí àn tí àn 的de de 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 批评pī píng pī píng ,, , 但dàn dàn 读者dú zhě dú zhě 应yīng yīng 认识rèn shí rèn shí 到dào dào 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 是shì shì 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 中立zhōng lì zhōng lì 的de de 事实陈述shì shí chén shù shì shí chén shù 。。 。
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 有yǒu yǒu 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 求职qiú zhí qiú zhí 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú ?? ?
**Did Labor have similar job search requirements?** Yes.
** * ** *
Mutual obligation requirements for jobseekers existed long before the Coalition's 2014 proposal: - **Work for the Dole** was introduced by the Howard government in 1997-1998 and continued under subsequent Labor governments [7]. - The **Gillard Labor government** maintained mutual obligation requirements for unemployment benefits throughout its term (2010-2013). - Jobseekers under Labor were already required to apply for **20 jobs per month** - the Coalition's proposal was to double this to 40, not create a new requirement from scratch [1]. - The **Rudd and Gillard governments** also reformed welfare-to-work programs and maintained compulsory job search requirements as a condition of receiving Newstart Allowance [7]. **Comparison:** The Coalition's 40 jobs proposal represented an intensification of existing mutual obligation requirements, not a new type of policy.
是shì shì 的de de 。。 。
The underlying framework of requiring job applications in exchange for benefits has been consistent across Coalition and Labor governments since the 1990s.
在zài zài 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 20142014 2014 年nián nián 提案tí àn tí àn 之前zhī qián zhī qián ,, , 求职者qiú zhí zhě qiú zhí zhě 的de de 互惠hù huì hù huì 义务yì wù yì wù 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 早已zǎo yǐ zǎo yǐ 存在cún zài cún zài :: :
-- - ** * ** * 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 换huàn huàn 福利fú lì fú lì ** * ** * 由yóu yóu 霍华德huò huá dé huò huá dé 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 19971997 1997 -- - 19981998 1998 年nián nián 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù ,, , 并bìng bìng 在zài zài 随后suí hòu suí hòu 的de de 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 时期shí qī shí qī 延续yán xù yán xù [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。 。
-- - ** * ** * 吉拉德jí lā dé jí lā dé 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ ** * ** * 在zài zài 其qí qí 任期rèn qī rèn qī 内nèi nèi (( ( 20102010 2010 -- - 20132013 2013 年nián nián )) ) 一直yì zhí yì zhí 维持wéi chí wéi chí 失业shī yè shī yè 福利fú lì fú lì 的de de 互惠hù huì hù huì 义务yì wù yì wù 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 。。 。
-- - 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 时期shí qī shí qī 的de de 求职者qiú zhí zhě qiú zhí zhě 已经yǐ jīng yǐ jīng 被bèi bèi 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 每月měi yuè měi yuè 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng ** * ** * 2020 20 份fèn fèn 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò ** * ** * —— — —— — 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 的de de 提案tí àn tí àn 是shì shì 将jiāng jiāng 这zhè zhè 一yī yī 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 翻倍fān bèi fān bèi 至zhì zhì 4040 40 份fèn fèn ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 从零开始cóng líng kāi shǐ cóng líng kāi shǐ 创造chuàng zào chuàng zào 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng 新xīn xīn 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
-- - ** * ** * 陆克文lù kè wén lù kè wén 和hé hé 吉拉德jí lā dé jí lā dé 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ ** * ** * 还hái hái 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 了le le 福利fú lì fú lì 到dào dào 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 的de de 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù ,, , 并bìng bìng 将jiāng jiāng 强制性qiáng zhì xìng qiáng zhì xìng 求职qiú zhí qiú zhí 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 领取lǐng qǔ lǐng qǔ NewstartNewstart Newstart 津贴jīn tiē jīn tiē 的de de 条件tiáo jiàn tiáo jiàn [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào :: : ** * ** * 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 的de de 4040 40 份fèn fèn 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 提案tí àn tí àn 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 了le le 现有xiàn yǒu xiàn yǒu 互惠hù huì hù huì 义务yì wù yì wù 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 的de de 强化qiáng huà qiáng huà ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 一种yī zhǒng yī zhǒng 全新quán xīn quán xīn 类型lèi xíng lèi xíng 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 。。 。
自zì zì 19901990 1990 年代nián dài nián dài 以来yǐ lái yǐ lái ,, , 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 以yǐ yǐ 求职qiú zhí qiú zhí 换取huàn qǔ huàn qǔ 福利fú lì fú lì 的de de 底层dǐ céng dǐ céng 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 在zài zài 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 和hé hé 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 之间zhī jiān zhī jiān 一直yì zhí yì zhí 保持bǎo chí bǎo chí 不变bù biàn bù biàn 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 将jiāng jiāng 4040 40 份fèn fèn 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 惩罚性chéng fá xìng chéng fá xìng 福利fú lì fú lì 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 的de de 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù ,, , 但dàn dàn 完整wán zhěng wán zhěng 故事gù shì gù shì 更为gèng wéi gèng wéi 微妙wēi miào wēi miào :: :
The claim presents the 40 jobs policy as evidence of punitive Coalition welfare policy, but the full story is more nuanced: **Criticisms that were valid:** - Business groups legitimately raised concerns about being overwhelmed with applications [3] - Critics argued the policy would generate "pro forma" applications rather than genuine job searches [3] - Welfare advocates noted the difficulty of applying for 40 jobs monthly while also doing work-for-the-dole [3] **Policy rationale provided by government:** - The Coalition argued the policy would ensure jobseekers were actively looking for work - Employment Minister Eric Abetz defended the proposal, suggesting jobseekers could apply for "one job in the morning and one in the afternoon" [1] - The policy was part of broader welfare reforms aimed at reducing long-term unemployment **What the claim doesn't acknowledge:** - The policy was abandoned in response to criticism - showing the government responded to stakeholder concerns - Similar mutual obligation requirements existed under Labor (20 jobs/month) - The "1 million applications per day" was a projection, not an actual outcome - The business community had mixed views - some welcomed aspects of the welfare reforms **Key context:** This was a **proposed** policy that was **never implemented** due to stakeholder opposition.
** * ** * 有效yǒu xiào yǒu xiào 的de de 批评pī píng pī píng :: : ** * ** *
The Coalition abandoned the proposal after 2.5 months, maintaining the status quo (20 jobs/month) that had existed under Labor.
-- - 商业shāng yè shāng yè 团体tuán tǐ tuán tǐ 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 提出tí chū tí chū 了le le 对duì duì 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng 量过大liàng guò dà liàng guò dà 的de de 担忧dān yōu dān yōu [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
-- - 批评者pī píng zhě pī píng zhě 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 将jiāng jiāng 产生chǎn shēng chǎn shēng "" " 格式化gé shì huà gé shì huà "" " 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 的de de 求职qiú zhí qiú zhí [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
-- - 福利fú lì fú lì 倡导者chàng dǎo zhě chàng dǎo zhě 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū ,, , 在zài zài 做zuò zuò 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 换huàn huàn 福利fú lì fú lì 的de de 同时tóng shí tóng shí 每月měi yuè měi yuè 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng 4040 40 份fèn fèn 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 的de de 困难kùn nán kùn nán [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 提供tí gōng tí gōng 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu :: : ** * ** *
-- - 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 辩称biàn chēng biàn chēng 该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 将jiāng jiāng 确保què bǎo què bǎo 求职者qiú zhí zhě qiú zhí zhě 积极jī jí jī jí 寻找xún zhǎo xún zhǎo 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò
-- - 就业jiù yè jiù yè 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng EricEric Eric AbetzAbetz Abetz 为wèi wèi 该gāi gāi 提案tí àn tí àn 辩护biàn hù biàn hù ,, , 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 求职者qiú zhí zhě qiú zhí zhě 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ "" " 上午shàng wǔ shàng wǔ 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng 一份yī fèn yī fèn 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò ,, , 下午xià wǔ xià wǔ 再zài zài 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng 一份yī fèn yī fèn "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
-- - 该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 是shì shì 旨在zhǐ zài zhǐ zài 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 长期cháng qī cháng qī 失业shī yè shī yè 的de de 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 福利fú lì fú lì 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 的de de 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn
** * ** * 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 未wèi wèi 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn 的de de 内容nèi róng nèi róng :: : ** * ** *
-- - 该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 因yīn yīn 批评pī píng pī píng 而ér ér 被bèi bèi 放弃fàng qì fàng qì —— — —— — 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 回应huí yìng huí yìng 了le le 利益lì yì lì yì 相关xiāng guān xiāng guān 方fāng fāng 的de de 关切guān qiè guān qiè
-- - 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 时期shí qī shí qī 也yě yě 存在cún zài cún zài 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 互惠hù huì hù huì 义务yì wù yì wù 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú (( ( 2020 20 份fèn fèn // / 月yuè yuè )) )
-- - "" " 每天měi tiān měi tiān 100100 100 万份wàn fèn wàn fèn 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng "" " 是shì shì 预测yù cè yù cè ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 实际shí jì shí jì 结果jié guǒ jié guǒ
-- - 商业界shāng yè jiè shāng yè jiè 看法kàn fǎ kàn fǎ 不bù bù 一yī yī —— — —— — 一些yī xiē yī xiē 人rén rén 对duì duì 福利fú lì fú lì 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 欢迎huān yíng huān yíng
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng :: : ** * ** * 这是zhè shì zhè shì 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng ** * ** * 被bèi bèi 提出tí chū tí chū ** * ** * 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè ,, , 由于yóu yú yóu yú 利益lì yì lì yì 相关xiāng guān xiāng guān 方fāng fāng 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 而ér ér ** * ** * 从未cóng wèi cóng wèi 实施shí shī shí shī ** * ** * 。。 。
联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 在zài zài 2.52.5 2.5 个gè gè 月yuè yuè 后hòu hòu 放弃fàng qì fàng qì 了le le 该gāi gāi 提案tí àn tí àn ,, , 维持wéi chí wéi chí 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 时期shí qī shí qī 就jiù jiù 已yǐ yǐ 存在cún zài cún zài 的de de 现状xiàn zhuàng xiàn zhuàng (( ( 2020 20 份fèn fèn // / 月yuè yuè )) ) 。。 。

具有误导性

4.0

/ 10

该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 将jiāng jiāng 每月měi yuè měi yuè 4040 40 份fèn fèn 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 为wèi wèi 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng 已yǐ yǐ 实施shí shī shí shī 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè ,, , 该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè "" " 强迫qiǎng pò qiǎng pò "" " 失业者shī yè zhě shī yè zhě 并bìng bìng 造成zào chéng zào chéng 了le le 后果hòu guǒ hòu guǒ (( ( "" " 将jiāng jiāng 淹没yān mò yān mò 企业qǐ yè qǐ yè "" " )) ) 。。 。
The claim presents the 40 jobs per month requirement as an implemented policy that actively "forced" unemployed people and created outcomes ("will bombard businesses").
然而rán ér rán ér :: :
However: 1.
11 1 .. . 该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 于yú yú 20142014 2014 年nián nián 77 7 月yuè yuè 提出tí chū tí chū ,, , 但dàn dàn 在zài zài 20142014 2014 年nián nián 1010 10 月yuè yuè ** * ** * 放弃fàng qì fàng qì ** * ** * ,, , 生效shēng xiào shēng xiào 前qián qián 即jí jí 被bèi bèi 搁置gē zhì gē zhì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
The policy was proposed in July 2014 but **abandoned by October 2014** before taking effect [1][2] 2.
22 2 .. . "" " 每天měi tiān měi tiān 100100 100 万份wàn fèn wàn fèn 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng "" " 是shì shì ** * ** * 理论lǐ lùn lǐ lùn 预测yù cè yù cè ** * ** * ,, , 来自lái zì lái zì 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn 专栏zhuān lán zhuān lán ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 实际shí jì shí jì 结果jié guǒ jié guǒ [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
The "1 million applications per day" was a **theoretical projection** from an opinion column, not an actual outcome [3] 3.
33 3 .. . 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 了le le 20142014 2014 年nián nián 从未cóng wèi cóng wèi 实现shí xiàn shí xiàn 的de de 未来wèi lái wèi lái 时态shí tài shí tài 预测yù cè yù cè
The claim uses future tense predictions from 2014 that never materialized 4.
44 4 .. . 该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 是shì shì 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 已yǐ yǐ 存在cún zài cún zài 的de de 每月měi yuè měi yuè 2020 20 份fèn fèn 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 的de de ** * ** * 强化qiáng huà qiáng huà ** * ** * [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 77 7 ]] ]
The policy was an **intensification** of existing 20 jobs/month requirements that existed under Labor governments [1][7] The claim omits that the policy was abandoned and that similar mutual obligation requirements existed across both major parties.
该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le 该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 已yǐ yǐ 被bèi bèi 放弃fàng qì fàng qì 的de de 事实shì shí shì shí ,, , 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 互惠hù huì hù huì 义务yì wù yì wù 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 在zài zài 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 期间qī jiān qī jiān 都dōu dōu 存在cún zài cún zài 。。 。
It presents a two-month policy proposal that never took effect as if it were implemented Coalition doctrine.
它tā tā 将jiāng jiāng 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng 为期wéi qī wéi qī 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 月yuè yuè 且qiě qiě 从未cóng wèi cóng wèi 生效shēng xiào shēng xiào 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 提案tí àn tí àn ,, , 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 得dé dé 好像hǎo xiàng hǎo xiàng 是shì shì 已yǐ yǐ 实施shí shī shí shī 的de de 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 教条jiào tiáo jiào tiáo 。。 。

📚 来源与引用 (7)

  1. 1
    news.com.au

    Abbott dumps 40 jobs a month plan for jobseekers

    News Com

  2. 2
    Coalition denies plan for unemployed people to apply for 40 jobs a month

    Coalition denies plan for unemployed people to apply for 40 jobs a month

    Assistant minister says the freshly scrapped proposal was for 40 job searches, not applications, a month

    the Guardian
  3. 3
    Lousy days loom for small businesses bombarded by job-seekers

    Lousy days loom for small businesses bombarded by job-seekers

    Red tape? It's only just begun. Forcing job-seekers to apply for 40 jobs each per month will bombard employers with more than 1 million applications per day, every working day of every year.

    The Sydney Morning Herald
  4. 4
    Unemployment hits 12-year high despite jump in job creation: ABS

    Unemployment hits 12-year high despite jump in job creation: ABS

    Unemployment has risen to a 12-year high of 6.3 per cent, despite almost 43,000 jobs being added in November.

    Abc Net
  5. 5
    Employment Minister defends 'earn or learn' strategy in federal budget

    Employment Minister defends 'earn or learn' strategy in federal budget

    Federal Employment Minister and Tasmanian Liberal Senator Eric Abetz has defended the tough budget, saying it seeks to lift the Tasmanian people. There are concerns changes to welfare spending and eligibility requirements will have a disproportionate impact in Tasmania. Senator Abetz rejects suggestions the changes are an attack on unemployed young people, saying they seek to break the welfare mentality.

    Abc Net
  6. 6
    legislation.gov.au

    Special Broadcasting Service Act 1991

    Federal Register of Legislation

  7. 7
    guides.dss.gov.au

    Mutual obligation requirements - Social Security Guide

    Guides Dss Gov

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。