The bill allowed rights holders to obtain court orders requiring ISPs to block access to overseas websites whose "primary purpose" was facilitating copyright infringement [1].
He elaborated that VPNs "have a wide range of legitimate purposes, not least of which is the preservation of privacy" and that the bill only targets sites whose "primary purpose" is copyright infringement [2].
The bill passed the Senate on June 22, 2015, with Coalition and Labor voting together (37-13) to defeat amendments proposed by Greens Senator Scott Ludlam [3].
The Labor opposition proposed only one amendment (calling for fair use to be introduced into Australian Copyright Law) and otherwise supported the bill without VPN-specific protections [4].
缺失背景
该 gāi 主张 zhǔ zhāng 遗漏 yí lòu 了 le 几个 jǐ gè 重要 zhòng yào 的 de 背景 bèi jǐng 要素 yào sù : :
The claim omits several important contextual elements:
First, the bill's "primary purpose" test theoretically excluded VPNs because VPNs have multiple legitimate uses (privacy, security, business applications) rather than having copyright infringement as their primary purpose [2].
Third, the bill included a mandatory review provision requiring assessment of its effectiveness after two years of operation [5], which provided a mechanism to address unintended consequences including any VPN blocking.
Fourth, the claim conflates "voting against a specific amendment" with "voting against VPN exemptions." The government maintained that the bill's existing structure already protected VPNs through the "primary purpose" test, making a specific exemption legally redundant rather than opposed in principle [2].
While Pirate Party Australia has expertise in digital rights issues and participated in parliamentary inquiries on this legislation [7], it is also an advocacy organization with a stated political position opposing copyright enforcement measures.
Their assessment should be understood as coming from an organization whose core platform includes opposing exactly this type of legislation [6].
该 gāi 主张 zhǔ zhāng 似乎 sì hū 将 jiāng 政党 zhèng dǎng 的 de 批评 pī píng 与 yǔ 客观 kè guān 的 de 事实 shì shí 核查 hé chá 混为一谈 hùn wéi yī tán 。 。
The claim appears to conflate a political party's criticism with an objective fact-check.
海盗 hǎi dào 党 dǎng 的 de 表述 biǎo shù 反映 fǎn yìng 了 le 他们 tā men 对 duì 该 gāi 立法 lì fǎ 的 de 反对 fǎn duì , , 而 ér 非 fēi 对 duì 政府 zhèng fǔ 声明 shēng míng 和 hé 投票 tóu piào 记录 jì lù 的 de 独立 dú lì 核实 hé shí 。 。
The Pirate Party's characterization reflects their opposition to the legislation rather than an independent verification of the government's statements and voting record.
Neither party supported the specific VPN exemptions proposed by the Greens, with both preferring the "primary purpose" test as the protection mechanism.
The government's position was that VPNs were already protected by the bill's "primary purpose" requirement, which required copyright infringement to be the main purpose of a service rather than merely one possible use [2].
Turnbull explicitly stated: "Where someone is using a VPN to access, for example, Netflix from the United States to get content in respect of which Netflix does not have an Australian licence, this bill would not deal with that, because you could not say that Netflix in the United States has as its primary purpose the infringement, or facilitation of the infringement, of copyright" [2].
Critics, including the Pirate Party, EFF, and consumer groups like CHOICE, argued that the "primary purpose" test was dangerously vague and could theoretically be applied to VPNs by aggressive rights holders [8].
The EFF noted that "operators of Virtual Private Network (VPN) services, some of whom specifically market their services for their ability to access blocked or geoblocked content" could be at risk [8].
The vote against the Greens' amendment was bipartisan (Coalition and Labor together), not a unilateral Coalition decision [4].
两个 liǎng gè 主要 zhǔ yào 政党 zhèng dǎng 都 dōu 接受 jiē shòu 了 le 政府 zhèng fǔ 的 de 保证 bǎo zhèng , , 即 jí " " 主要 zhǔ yào 目的 mù dì " " 测试 cè shì 已 yǐ 提供 tí gōng 了 le 足够 zú gòu 的 de 保护 bǎo hù 。 。
Both major parties accepted the government's assurance that the "primary purpose" test was sufficient protection.
部分属实
6.0
/ 10
该 gāi 主张 zhǔ zhāng 具有 jù yǒu 事实 shì shí 依据 yī jù , , 但 dàn 呈现 chéng xiàn 了 le 误导性 wù dǎo xìng 的 de 图景 tú jǐng 。 。
The claim has a factual basis but presents a misleading picture.
Malcolm Malcolm Turnbull Turnbull 确实 què shí 曾 céng 表示 biǎo shì VPN VPN 不会 bú huì 受到 shòu dào 该 gāi 立法 lì fǎ 的 de 影响 yǐng xiǎng , , 且 qiě Coalition Coalition ( ( 与 yǔ Labor Labor 一起 yì qǐ ) ) 确实 què shí 投票 tóu piào 反对 fǎn duì 了 le 绿党 lǜ dǎng 将 jiāng 明确 míng què 豁免 huò miǎn VPN VPN 的 de 修正案 xiū zhèng àn 。 。
Malcolm Turnbull did state that VPNs would not be affected by the legislation, and the Coalition (along with Labor) did vote against Greens amendments that would have explicitly exempted VPNs.
然而 rán ér , , 该 gāi 主张 zhǔ zhāng 未 wèi 提及 tí jí : : ( ( 1 1 ) ) 政府 zhèng fǔ 辩称 biàn chēng VPN VPN 已 yǐ 受到 shòu dào " " 主要 zhǔ yào 目的 mù dì " " 测试 cè shì 的 de 保护 bǎo hù , , ( ( 2 2 ) ) Labor Labor 也 yě 投票 tóu piào 反对 fǎn duì 了 le VPN VPN 修正案 xiū zhèng àn , , 使 shǐ 其 qí 成为 chéng wéi 两党 liǎng dǎng 共同 gòng tóng 行为 xíng wéi 而 ér 非 fēi Coalition Coalition 特有 tè yǒu 的 de 行为 xíng wéi , , 以及 yǐ jí ( ( 3 3 ) ) 政府 zhèng fǔ 的 de 评估 píng gū 似乎 sì hū 是 shì 准确 zhǔn què 的 de , , 因为 yīn wèi 自该 zì gāi 立法 lì fǎ 实施 shí shī 以来 yǐ lái VPN VPN 并未 bìng wèi 被 bèi 封锁 fēng suǒ 。 。
However, the claim omits that: (1) the government argued VPNs were already protected by the "primary purpose" test, (2) Labor also voted against the VPN amendments, making this bipartisan rather than a Coalition-specific action, and (3) the government's assessment appears to have been accurate as VPNs have not been blocked under this legislation.
The framing suggests hypocrisy where there was legitimate legal reasoning behind the position.
最终评分
6.0
/ 10
部分属实
该 gāi 主张 zhǔ zhāng 具有 jù yǒu 事实 shì shí 依据 yī jù , , 但 dàn 呈现 chéng xiàn 了 le 误导性 wù dǎo xìng 的 de 图景 tú jǐng 。 。
The claim has a factual basis but presents a misleading picture.
Malcolm Malcolm Turnbull Turnbull 确实 què shí 曾 céng 表示 biǎo shì VPN VPN 不会 bú huì 受到 shòu dào 该 gāi 立法 lì fǎ 的 de 影响 yǐng xiǎng , , 且 qiě Coalition Coalition ( ( 与 yǔ Labor Labor 一起 yì qǐ ) ) 确实 què shí 投票 tóu piào 反对 fǎn duì 了 le 绿党 lǜ dǎng 将 jiāng 明确 míng què 豁免 huò miǎn VPN VPN 的 de 修正案 xiū zhèng àn 。 。
Malcolm Turnbull did state that VPNs would not be affected by the legislation, and the Coalition (along with Labor) did vote against Greens amendments that would have explicitly exempted VPNs.
然而 rán ér , , 该 gāi 主张 zhǔ zhāng 未 wèi 提及 tí jí : : ( ( 1 1 ) ) 政府 zhèng fǔ 辩称 biàn chēng VPN VPN 已 yǐ 受到 shòu dào " " 主要 zhǔ yào 目的 mù dì " " 测试 cè shì 的 de 保护 bǎo hù , , ( ( 2 2 ) ) Labor Labor 也 yě 投票 tóu piào 反对 fǎn duì 了 le VPN VPN 修正案 xiū zhèng àn , , 使 shǐ 其 qí 成为 chéng wéi 两党 liǎng dǎng 共同 gòng tóng 行为 xíng wéi 而 ér 非 fēi Coalition Coalition 特有 tè yǒu 的 de 行为 xíng wéi , , 以及 yǐ jí ( ( 3 3 ) ) 政府 zhèng fǔ 的 de 评估 píng gū 似乎 sì hū 是 shì 准确 zhǔn què 的 de , , 因为 yīn wèi 自该 zì gāi 立法 lì fǎ 实施 shí shī 以来 yǐ lái VPN VPN 并未 bìng wèi 被 bèi 封锁 fēng suǒ 。 。
However, the claim omits that: (1) the government argued VPNs were already protected by the "primary purpose" test, (2) Labor also voted against the VPN amendments, making this bipartisan rather than a Coalition-specific action, and (3) the government's assessment appears to have been accurate as VPNs have not been blocked under this legislation.