部分属实

评分： 6.0/10

报告问题
Coalition
C0540

声明内容

“在没有咨询艺术行业任何人的情况下，从澳大利亚艺术委员会削减了1.05亿澳元。”
文化艺术
原始来源： Matthew Davis

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

** * ** * 1.051.05 1.05 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 数字shù zì shù zì 在zài zài 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng 是shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de 。。 。
**The $105 million figure is factually accurate.** The 2015-16 federal budget announced by then-Arts Minister George Brandis diverted $104.7 million (commonly rounded to $105 million) over four years from the Australia Council to establish the National Programme for Excellence in the Arts (NPEA) [1][2].
 ** * ** * 20152015 2015 -- - 1616 16 年度nián dù nián dù 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 预算yù suàn yù suàn 由yóu yóu 时任shí rèn shí rèn 艺术yì shù yì shù 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng GeorgeGeorge George BrandisBrandis Brandis 宣布xuān bù xuān bù ，， ， 从cóng cóng 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 艺术yì shù yì shù 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 转移zhuǎn yí zhuǎn yí 1.0471.047 1.047 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán （（ （ 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 四舍五入sì shě wǔ rù sì shě wǔ rù 为wèi wèi 1.051.05 1.05 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán ）） ） ，， ， 历时lì shí lì shí 四年sì nián sì nián ，， ， 用于yòng yú yòng yú 设立shè lì shè lì 国家guó jiā guó jiā 卓越zhuó yuè zhuó yuè 艺术yì shù yì shù 计划jì huà jì huà （（ （ NPEANPEA NPEA ）） ） [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
However, the claim omits several crucial details: 1. **Partial Reversal:** After Malcolm Turnbull replaced Tony Abbott as Prime Minister in September 2015 and Senator Mitch Fifield replaced Brandis as Arts Minister, the government announced in November 2015 that $32 million would be returned to the Australia Council over four years, reducing the net cut to approximately $72-73 million [3][4]. 2. **Efficiency Measures:** The Australia Council was also subject to efficiency measures of $1.8 million per year for four years, totaling approximately $7.2 million [5]. 3. **The funding was redirected, not eliminated.** The money was moved from the Australia Council to create a new minister-administered fund (NPEA, later renamed Catalyst) with different eligibility criteria [1][2].
 然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 细节xì jié xì jié ：： ：
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 部分bù fèn bù fèn 撤销chè xiāo chè xiāo ：： ： ** * ** * 20152015 2015 年nián nián 99 9 月yuè yuè MalcolmMalcolm Malcolm TurnbullTurnbull Turnbull 取代qǔ dài qǔ dài TonyTony Tony AbbottAbbott Abbott 成为chéng wéi chéng wéi 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ ，， ， 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán MitchMitch Mitch FifieldFifield Fifield 取代qǔ dài qǔ dài BrandisBrandis Brandis 担任dān rèn dān rèn 艺术yì shù yì shù 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 后hòu hòu ，， ， 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 于yú yú 20152015 2015 年nián nián 1111 11 月yuè yuè 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 将jiāng jiāng 在zài zài 四年sì nián sì nián 内nèi nèi 返还fǎn huán fǎn huán 32003200 3200 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 给gěi gěi 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 艺术yì shù yì shù 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì ，， ， 净jìng jìng 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 额降é jiàng é jiàng 至zhì zhì 约yuē yuē 72007200 7200 -- - 73007300 7300 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 效率xiào lǜ xiào lǜ 措施cuò shī cuò shī ：： ： ** * ** * 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 艺术yì shù yì shù 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 还hái hái 面临miàn lín miàn lín 每年měi nián měi nián 180180 180 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 、、 、 为期wéi qī wéi qī 四年sì nián sì nián 的de de 效率xiào lǜ xiào lǜ 措施cuò shī cuò shī ，， ， 总计zǒng jì zǒng jì 约yuē yuē 720720 720 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 资金zī jīn zī jīn 被bèi bèi 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 定向dìng xiàng dìng xiàng ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 。。 。
** * ** * 这笔zhè bǐ zhè bǐ 资金zī jīn zī jīn 从cóng cóng 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 艺术yì shù yì shù 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 转移zhuǎn yí zhuǎn yí 到dào dào 创建chuàng jiàn chuàng jiàn 一个yí gè yí gè 新xīn xīn 的de de 由yóu yóu 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 管理guǎn lǐ guǎn lǐ 的de de 基金jī jīn jī jīn （（ （ NPEANPEA NPEA ，， ， 后hòu hòu 更名gēng míng gēng míng 为wèi wèi CatalystCatalyst Catalyst ）） ） ，， ， 该gāi gāi 基金jī jīn jī jīn 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 不同bù tóng bù tóng 的de de 资格zī gé zī gé 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。

缺失背景

** * ** * 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 表演艺术biǎo yǎn yì shù biǎo yǎn yì shù 公司gōng sī gōng sī 受到shòu dào shòu dào 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù ：： ： ** * ** * BrandisBrandis Brandis 明确míng què míng què 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì "" " 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 艺术yì shù yì shù 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 对duì duì 2828 28 家jiā jiā 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 表演艺术biǎo yǎn yì shù biǎo yǎn yì shù 公司gōng sī gōng sī 的de de 资助zī zhù zī zhù 不会bú huì bú huì 有yǒu yǒu 任何rèn hé rèn hé 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo "" " [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
**Major Performing Arts Companies Were Protected:** Brandis explicitly stated that "there will be no reduction in the Australia Council's funding to the 28 major performing arts companies" [5].
 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 措施cuò shī cuò shī 的de de 结构jié gòu jié gòu 是shì shì 全部quán bù quán bù 落luò luò 在zài zài 中小型zhōng xiǎo xíng zhōng xiǎo xíng 艺术yì shù yì shù 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 和hé hé 个人gè rén gè rén 艺术家yì shù jiā yì shù jiā 身上shēn shàng shēn shàng ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 已yǐ yǐ 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì 的de de 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 公司gōng sī gōng sī 。。 。
The cuts were structured to fall entirely on small-to-medium arts organizations and individual artists, not the established major companies. **Not the First Budget Cut:** The Australia Council had already experienced cuts in the 2014-15 budget ($9.6 million in 2014-15, plus approximately $6 million per year for three following years) [5].
 ** * ** * 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 首次shǒu cì shǒu cì 预算yù suàn yù suàn 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn ：： ： ** * ** * 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 艺术yì shù yì shù 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 在zài zài 20142014 2014 -- - 1515 15 年度预算nián dù yù suàn nián dù yù suàn 中zhōng zhōng 已yǐ yǐ 经历jīng lì jīng lì 过guò guò 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn （（ （ 20142014 2014 -- - 1515 15 年度nián dù nián dù 960960 960 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán ，， ， 加上jiā shàng jiā shàng 此后cǐ hòu cǐ hòu 三年sān nián sān nián 每年měi nián měi nián 约yuē yuē 600600 600 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán ）） ） [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
The cumulative impact of 2014 and 2015 budget measures represented a total reduction of approximately $34.2 million (including indexation) or $41 million (excluding indexation) for the 2015-16 financial year alone [5]. **Programs Discontinued:** As a result of the cuts, the Australia Council discontinued several programs including ArtStart (for early career artists), Creative Community Partnerships Initiative, Artists in Residence program, and reduced the number of fellowships from 14 to 8 [5]. **Senate Inquiry Triggered:** The controversy prompted a Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee inquiry into "the impact of the 2014 and 2015 Commonwealth Budget decisions on the Arts," which received 2,719 submissions and held ten public hearings across Australia [5].
 20142014 2014 年nián nián 和hé hé 20152015 2015 年nián nián 预算yù suàn yù suàn 措施cuò shī cuò shī 的de de 累积lěi jī lěi jī 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 使shǐ shǐ 20152015 2015 -- - 1616 16 财年cái nián cái nián 单独dān dú dān dú 的de de 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 总额zǒng é zǒng é 达到dá dào dá dào 约yuē yuē 34203420 3420 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán （（ （ 含hán hán 指数化zhǐ shù huà zhǐ shù huà ）） ） 或huò huò 41004100 4100 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán （（ （ 不bù bù 含hán hán 指数化zhǐ shù huà zhǐ shù huà ）） ） [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 被bèi bèi 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo ：： ： ** * ** * 由于yóu yú yóu yú 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn ，， ， 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 艺术yì shù yì shù 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 停止tíng zhǐ tíng zhǐ 了le le 多个duō gè duō gè 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù ，， ， 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò ArtStartArtStart ArtStart （（ （ 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 早期zǎo qī zǎo qī 职业zhí yè zhí yè 艺术家yì shù jiā yì shù jiā ）） ） 、、 、 创意chuàng yì chuàng yì 社区shè qū shè qū 伙伴关系huǒ bàn guān xì huǒ bàn guān xì 倡议chàng yì chàng yì 、、 、 艺术家yì shù jiā yì shù jiā 驻留zhù liú zhù liú 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù ，， ， 并bìng bìng 将jiāng jiāng 奖学金jiǎng xué jīn jiǎng xué jīn 数量shù liàng shù liàng 从cóng cóng 1414 14 个gè gè 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 到dào dào 88 8 个gè gè [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 触发chù fā chù fā 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 调查diào chá diào chá ：： ： ** * ** * 这场zhè chǎng zhè chǎng 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì 促使cù shǐ cù shǐ 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 与yǔ yǔ 宪法xiàn fǎ xiàn fǎ 事务shì wù shì wù 参考cān kǎo cān kǎo 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 对duì duì "" " 20142014 2014 年nián nián 和hé hé 20152015 2015 年nián nián 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 预算yù suàn yù suàn 决策jué cè jué cè 对duì duì 艺术yì shù yì shù 的de de 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng "" " 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 调查diào chá diào chá ，， ， 该gāi gāi 调查diào chá diào chá 收到shōu dào shōu dào 27192719 2719 份fèn fèn 提交tí jiāo tí jiāo 材料cái liào cái liào ，， ， 并bìng bìng 在zài zài 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 各地gè dì gè dì 举行jǔ xíng jǔ xíng 了le le 十场shí chǎng shí chǎng 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 听证会tīng zhèng huì tīng zhèng huì [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。

来源可信度评估

** * ** * NewNew New MatildaMatilda Matilda ** * ** * 被bèi bèi MediaMedia Media BiasBias Bias // / FactFact Fact CheckCheck Check 评为píng wèi píng wèi ：： ：
**New Matilda** is rated by Media Bias/Fact Check as: - **Bias:** Left (-5.7 on their scale) - **Factual Reporting:** High (1.2 - their highest rating) - **Credibility Rating:** High Credibility - **No failed fact checks** in the last 5 years [6] New Matilda is an independent Australian website founded in 2004 that publishes news, analysis, and satire from a left-wing/progressive perspective.
 -- - ** * ** * 偏见piān jiàn piān jiàn ：： ： ** * ** * 左派zuǒ pài zuǒ pài （（ （ 其qí qí 量表liàng biǎo liàng biǎo 为wèi wèi -- - 5.75.7 5.7 ）） ）
While it has a clear editorial bias, it is generally well-sourced and factual in its reporting [6][7].
 -- - ** * ** * 事实shì shí shì shí 报道bào dào bào dào ：： ： ** * ** * 高gāo gāo （（ （ 1.21.2 1.2 —— — —— — 其qí qí 最高zuì gāo zuì gāo 评分píng fēn píng fēn ）） ）
The article's headline framing ("how to destroy sector without even really trying") is clearly opinionated and adversarial, consistent with New Matilda's progressive editorial stance.
 -- - ** * ** * 可信度kě xìn dù kě xìn dù 评级píng jí píng jí ：： ： ** * ** * 高gāo gāo 可信度kě xìn dù kě xìn dù
However, the underlying factual claims about the funding cuts are verifiable from government budget documents and mainstream media sources.
 -- - 过去guò qù guò qù 55 5 年nián nián 中zhōng zhōng ** * ** * 无wú wú 事实shì shí shì shí 核查hé chá hé chá 失败shī bài shī bài ** * ** * 记录jì lù jì lù [[ [ 66 6 ]] ]
NewNew New MatildaMatilda Matilda 是shì shì 一家yī jiā yī jiā 成立chéng lì chéng lì 于yú yú 20042004 2004 年nián nián 的de de 独立dú lì dú lì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 网站wǎng zhàn wǎng zhàn ，， ， 从cóng cóng 左翼zuǒ yì zuǒ yì // / 进步jìn bù jìn bù 视角shì jiǎo shì jiǎo 发布新闻fā bù xīn wén fā bù xīn wén 、、 、 分析fēn xī fēn xī 和hé hé 讽刺fěng cì fěng cì 内容nèi róng nèi róng 。。 。
虽然suī rán suī rán 它tā tā 有yǒu yǒu 明显míng xiǎn míng xiǎn 的de de 编辑biān jí biān jí 偏见piān jiàn piān jiàn ，， ， 但dàn dàn 其qí qí 报道bào dào bào dào 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 来源lái yuán lái yuán 可靠kě kào kě kào 、、 、 事实shì shí shì shí 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。 。
该gāi gāi 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 的de de 标题biāo tí biāo tí 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù （（ （ "" " 如何rú hé rú hé 在zài zài 不费吹灰之力bù fèi chuī huī zhī lì bù fèi chuī huī zhī lì 的de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 下xià xià 摧毁cuī huǐ cuī huǐ 一个yí gè yí gè 行业háng yè háng yè "" " ）） ） 显然xiǎn rán xiǎn rán 是shì shì 带有dài yǒu dài yǒu 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn 性xìng xìng 和hé hé 对抗性duì kàng xìng duì kàng xìng 的de de ，， ， 与yǔ yǔ NewNew New MatildaMatilda Matilda 的de de 进步jìn bù jìn bù 编辑biān jí biān jí 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 一致yí zhì yí zhì 。。 。
然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， 关于guān yú guān yú 资金zī jīn zī jīn 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 的de de 基本jī běn jī běn 事实性shì shí xìng shì shí xìng 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ 从cóng cóng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 预算yù suàn yù suàn 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 和hé hé 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán 得到dé dào dé dào 验证yàn zhèng yàn zhèng 。。 。
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做过zuò guò zuò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng ？？ ？
**Did Labor do something similar?** Search conducted: "Labor government arts funding cuts history Australia Council" **Finding:** Labor governments have generally been more supportive of arts funding, but have also made budget adjustments: 1. **Creative Australia (2013):** The Gillard Labor government developed "Creative Australia," the National Cultural Policy that actually *increased* funding to the Australia Council by $75.4 million over four years, following a 2012 review that recommended a $21.25 million annual increase [5]. 2. **Historical Pattern:** Research shows that federal arts spending fell by 22.7% per capita over the 10 years of Coalition government (2013-2022), indicating a consistent pattern of arts funding reduction under Coalition governments compared to Labor [8]. 3. **No Direct Equivalent:** There is no direct equivalent of the 2015 Australia Council cuts under Labor.
 ** * ** *
Labor's approach to arts funding has historically been more expansionary, with the 2013 National Cultural Policy representing a significant investment increase. **Comparison:** The Coalition's approach to arts funding in 2014-2015 was distinctly different from Labor's record.
 搜索sōu suǒ sōu suǒ 查询chá xún chá xún ：： ： "" " LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 艺术yì shù yì shù 资助zī zhù zī zhù 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 艺术yì shù yì shù 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì "" "
While Labor increased Australia Council funding through Creative Australia, the Coalition's budget measures represented the most significant restructuring of arts funding arrangements in decades.
 ** * ** * 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn ：： ： ** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 更gèng gèng 支持zhī chí zhī chí 艺术yì shù yì shù 资助zī zhù zī zhù ，， ， 但dàn dàn 也yě yě 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 过guò guò 预算yù suàn yù suàn 调整tiáo zhěng tiáo zhěng ：： ：
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 创意chuàng yì chuàng yì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà （（ （ 20132013 2013 年nián nián ）） ） ：： ： ** * ** * GillardGillard Gillard 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 制定zhì dìng zhì dìng 了le le "" " 创意chuàng yì chuàng yì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà "" " 国家guó jiā guó jiā 文化wén huà wén huà 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè ，， ， 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng ** * 增加zēng jiā zēng jiā ** * 了le le 对duì duì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 艺术yì shù yì shù 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 的de de 资助zī zhù zī zhù ，， ， 四年sì nián sì nián 内nèi nèi 增加zēng jiā zēng jiā 75407540 7540 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán ，， ， 这zhè zhè 是shì shì 继jì jì 20122012 2012 年nián nián 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 每年měi nián měi nián 增加zēng jiā zēng jiā 21252125 2125 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 的de de 审查shěn chá shěn chá 之后zhī hòu zhī hòu 实施shí shī shí shī 的de de [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ 模式mó shì mó shì ：： ： ** * ** * 研究yán jiū yán jiū 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng ，， ， 在zài zài CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 的de de 1010 10 年间nián jiān nián jiān （（ （ 20132013 2013 -- - 20222022 2022 年nián nián ）） ） ，， ， 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 艺术yì shù yì shù 支出zhī chū zhī chū 人均rén jūn rén jūn 下降xià jiàng xià jiàng 了le le 22.7%22.7% 22.7% ，， ， 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 与yǔ yǔ 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 相比xiāng bǐ xiāng bǐ ，， ， CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 一贯yí guàn yí guàn 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 艺术yì shù yì shù 资助zī zhù zī zhù [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。 。
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 无wú wú 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 对应duì yìng duì yìng ：： ： ** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 期间qī jiān qī jiān 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 与yǔ yǔ 20152015 2015 年nián nián 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 艺术yì shù yì shù 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 对应duì yìng duì yìng 的de de 举措jǔ cuò jǔ cuò 。。 。
工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 对duì duì 艺术yì shù yì shù 资助zī zhù zī zhù 的de de 态度tài dù tài dù 历来lì lái lì lái 更为gèng wéi gèng wéi 扩张kuò zhāng kuò zhāng ，， ， 20132013 2013 年nián nián 国家guó jiā guó jiā 文化wén huà wén huà 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 了le le 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 投资tóu zī tóu zī 增长zēng zhǎng zēng zhǎng 。。 。
** * ** * 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào ：： ： ** * ** * CoalitionCoalition Coalition 在zài zài 20142014 2014 -- - 20152015 2015 年nián nián 对duì duì 艺术yì shù yì shù 资助zī zhù zī zhù 的de de 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ 与yǔ yǔ 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 的de de 记录jì lù jì lù 明显míng xiǎn míng xiǎn 不同bù tóng bù tóng 。。 。
虽然suī rán suī rán 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 通过tōng guò tōng guò 创意chuàng yì chuàng yì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 增加zēng jiā zēng jiā 了le le 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 艺术yì shù yì shù 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 的de de 资助zī zhù zī zhù ，， ， 但dàn dàn CoalitionCoalition Coalition 的de de 预算yù suàn yù suàn 措施cuò shī cuò shī 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 了le le 几十年jǐ shí nián jǐ shí nián 来lái lái 艺术yì shù yì shù 资助zī zhù zī zhù 安排ān pái ān pái 最zuì zuì 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 的de de 重组chóng zǔ chóng zǔ 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu ：： ： ** * ** *
**The Government's Justification:** Senator Brandis defended the changes, stating: "This is a very good budget for the arts.
 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán BrandisBrandis Brandis 为wèi wèi 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 变化biàn huà biàn huà 辩护biàn hù biàn hù ，， ， 称chēng chēng ：： ： "" " 这zhè zhè 对duì duì 艺术yì shù yì shù 来说lái shuō lái shuō 是shì shì 一份yī fèn yī fèn 非常fēi cháng fēi cháng 好hǎo hǎo 的de de 预算yù suàn yù suàn 。。 。
There have been no significant cuts at all" [2].
 根本gēn běn gēn běn 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The government argued that: 1.
 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 辩称biàn chēng biàn chēng ：： ：
The NPEA/Catalyst would "allow for a truly national approach to arts funding" [5] 2.
 11 1 .. . NPEANPEA NPEA // / CatalystCatalyst Catalyst 将jiāng jiāng "" " 实现shí xiàn shí xiàn 对duì duì 艺术yì shù yì shù 资助zī zhù zī zhù 的de de 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 全国性quán guó xìng quán guó xìng 方法fāng fǎ fāng fǎ "" " [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
The program would "deliver on a number of Government priorities including national access to high quality arts and cultural experiences" [5] 3.
 22 2 .. . 该gāi gāi 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 将jiāng jiāng "" " 兑现duì xiàn duì xiàn 多项duō xiàng duō xiàng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 优先yōu xiān yōu xiān 事项shì xiàng shì xiàng ，， ， 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 全国quán guó quán guó 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi 内nèi nèi 获得huò dé huò dé 高质量gāo zhì liàng gāo zhì liàng 艺术yì shù yì shù 和hé hé 文化wén huà wén huà 体验tǐ yàn tǐ yàn "" " [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
It would "make funding available to a wider range of arts companies and arts practitioners" [5] 4.
 33 3 .. . 它tā tā 将jiāng jiāng "" " 使shǐ shǐ 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 艺术家yì shù jiā yì shù jiā 公司gōng sī gōng sī 和hé hé 艺术yì shù yì shù 从业者cóng yè zhě cóng yè zhě 能够néng gòu néng gòu 获得huò dé huò dé 资助zī zhù zī zhù "" " [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
The emphasis on excellence and attracting private sector support aligned with government priorities [5] **Industry Response:** The arts sector response was overwhelmingly negative: - Over 5,800 people signed a petition opposing the "massive defunding" [2] - Protests were staged nationally under the #freethearts banner in multiple cities [2] - Arts organizations expressed concerns about the removal of peer review (arm's length assessment) in favor of ministerial discretion [2] - More than 60 small-to-medium arts organizations lost ongoing funding for the first time, a loss "never occurred previously in the Australian arts sector" [3] - Australia Council CEO Tony Grybowski acknowledged the cuts would have "significant impact" on the sector's work [2] **The "Without Consultation" Claim:** The claim that the cuts were made "without consulting anyone in the arts industry" requires scrutiny.
 44 4 .. . 对duì duì 卓越性zhuó yuè xìng zhuó yuè xìng 的de de 重视zhòng shì zhòng shì 和hé hé 吸引xī yǐn xī yǐn 私营部门sī yíng bù mén sī yíng bù mén 支持zhī chí zhī chí 与yǔ yǔ 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 优先yōu xiān yōu xiān 事项shì xiàng shì xiàng 一致yí zhì yí zhì [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
The budget announcement was indeed sudden and prompted widespread outrage about the lack of prior consultation.
 ** * ** * 行业háng yè háng yè 反应fǎn yìng fǎn yìng ：： ： ** * ** *
However: 1.
 艺术界yì shù jiè yì shù jiè 的de de 反应fǎn yìng fǎn yìng overwhelminglyoverwhelmingly overwhelmingly 是shì shì 负面fù miàn fù miàn 的de de ：： ：
After the backlash, the government released draft NPEA guidelines in July 2015 seeking public feedback, receiving 330 submissions [5] 2.
 -- - 超过chāo guò chāo guò 58005800 5800 人rén rén 签署qiān shǔ qiān shǔ 请愿书qǐng yuàn shū qǐng yuàn shū 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì "" " 大规模dà guī mó dà guī mó 撤资chè zī chè zī "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
The subsequent Senate inquiry provided extensive opportunity for stakeholder input, with 2,719 submissions received [5] 3.
 -- - 全国quán guó quán guó 多个duō gè duō gè 城市chéng shì chéng shì 在zài zài ## # freetheartsfreethearts freethearts 标签biāo qiān biāo qiān 下xià xià 举行jǔ xíng jǔ xíng 抗议kàng yì kàng yì 活动huó dòng huó dòng [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
The changes announced in November 2015 partially addressed some sector concerns by returning $32 million to the Australia Council and rebranding NPEA as Catalyst with modified guidelines [4][5] Whether this constitutes adequate "consultation" is debatable.
 -- - 艺术yì shù yì shù 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 担心dān xīn dān xīn 以yǐ yǐ 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 裁量权cái liàng quán cái liàng quán 取代qǔ dài qǔ dài 同行tóng háng tóng háng 评审píng shěn píng shěn （（ （ 独立dú lì dú lì 评估píng gū píng gū ）） ） [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
The initial decision was certainly made without prior industry consultation, but subsequent processes allowed for feedback that influenced the final outcome. **Key context:** This was not a simple budget cut but a fundamental restructuring of arts funding arrangements in Australia, shifting significant decision-making power from an independent statutory body (Australia Council) to ministerial discretion.
 -- - 6060 60 多家duō jiā duō jiā 中小型zhōng xiǎo xíng zhōng xiǎo xíng 艺术yì shù yì shù 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 首次shǒu cì shǒu cì 失去shī qù shī qù 持续chí xù chí xù 资助zī zhù zī zhù ，， ， 这一zhè yī zhè yī 损失sǔn shī sǔn shī "" " 在zài zài 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 艺术界yì shù jiè yì shù jiè 此前cǐ qián cǐ qián 从未cóng wèi cóng wèi 发生fā shēng fā shēng 过guò guò "" " [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
This structural change, combined with the scale of funding reduction and lack of prior consultation, explains the intensity of sector response.
 -- - 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 艺术yì shù yì shù 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 首席shǒu xí shǒu xí 执行官zhí xíng guān zhí xíng guān TonyTony Tony GrybowskiGrybowski Grybowski 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 将jiāng jiāng 对duì duì 行业háng yè háng yè 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 产生chǎn shēng chǎn shēng "" " 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
** * ** * "" " 未wèi wèi 磋商cuō shāng cuō shāng "" " 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ ：： ： ** * ** *
"" " 未wèi wèi 咨询zī xún zī xún 艺术yì shù yì shù 行业háng yè háng yè 任何人rèn hé rén rèn hé rén "" " 的de de 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 需要xū yào xū yào 仔细zǐ xì zǐ xì 审查shěn chá shěn chá 。。 。
预算yù suàn yù suàn announcementannouncement announcement 确实què shí què shí 是shì shì 突然tū rán tū rán 的de de ，， ， 并bìng bìng 引发yǐn fā yǐn fā 了le le 关于guān yú guān yú 缺乏quē fá quē fá 事先shì xiān shì xiān 磋商cuō shāng cuō shāng 的de de 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 愤怒fèn nù fèn nù 。。 。
然而rán ér rán ér ：： ：
11 1 .. . 在zài zài 强烈qiáng liè qiáng liè 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 之后zhī hòu zhī hòu ，， ， 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 于yú yú 20152015 2015 年nián nián 77 7 月yuè yuè 发布fā bù fā bù 了le le NPEANPEA NPEA 指南zhǐ nán zhǐ nán 草案cǎo àn cǎo àn 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng 反馈fǎn kuì fǎn kuì ，， ， 收到shōu dào shōu dào 330330 330 份fèn fèn 提交tí jiāo tí jiāo 材料cái liào cái liào [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
22 2 .. . 随后suí hòu suí hòu 的de de 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 调查diào chá diào chá 为wèi wèi 利益lì yì lì yì 相关者xiāng guān zhě xiāng guān zhě 提供tí gōng tí gōng 了le le 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 参与cān yù cān yù 机会jī huì jī huì ，， ， 收到shōu dào shōu dào 27192719 2719 份fèn fèn 提交tí jiāo tí jiāo 材料cái liào cái liào [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
33 3 .. . 20152015 2015 年nián nián 1111 11 月yuè yuè 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 的de de 变化biàn huà biàn huà 部分bù fèn bù fèn 解决jiě jué jiě jué 了le le 行业háng yè háng yè 的de de 一些yī xiē yī xiē 关切guān qiè guān qiè ，， ， 将jiāng jiāng 32003200 3200 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 返还fǎn huán fǎn huán 给gěi gěi 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 艺术yì shù yì shù 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì ，， ， 并bìng bìng 将jiāng jiāng NPEANPEA NPEA 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 品牌pǐn pái pǐn pái 为wèi wèi CatalystCatalyst Catalyst ，， ， 同时tóng shí tóng shí 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi 了le le 指南zhǐ nán zhǐ nán [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
这zhè zhè 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 构成gòu chéng gòu chéng 充分chōng fèn chōng fèn 的de de "" " 磋商cuō shāng cuō shāng "" " 存在cún zài cún zài 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì 。。 。
最初zuì chū zuì chū 的de de 决定jué dìng jué dìng 确实què shí què shí 是shì shì 在zài zài 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 事先shì xiān shì xiān 与yǔ yǔ 行业háng yè háng yè 磋商cuō shāng cuō shāng 的de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 下xià xià 做出zuò chū zuò chū 的de de ，， ， 但dàn dàn 随后suí hòu suí hòu 的de de 程序chéng xù chéng xù 允许yǔn xǔ yǔn xǔ 反馈fǎn kuì fǎn kuì 并bìng bìng 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 了le le 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 结果jié guǒ jié guǒ 。。 。
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ：： ： ** * ** * 这zhè zhè 不仅仅bù jǐn jǐn bù jǐn jǐn 是shì shì 简单jiǎn dān jiǎn dān 的de de 预算yù suàn yù suàn 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn ，， ， 而是ér shì ér shì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 艺术yì shù yì shù 资助zī zhù zī zhù 安排ān pái ān pái 的de de 根本性gēn běn xìng gēn běn xìng 重组chóng zǔ chóng zǔ ，， ， 将jiāng jiāng 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 决策权jué cè quán jué cè quán 从cóng cóng 独立dú lì dú lì 法定fǎ dìng fǎ dìng 机构jī gòu jī gòu （（ （ 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 艺术yì shù yì shù 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì ）） ） 转移zhuǎn yí zhuǎn yí 到dào dào 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 裁量权cái liàng quán cái liàng quán 。。 。
这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 结构性jié gòu xìng jié gòu xìng 变化biàn huà biàn huà ，， ， 加上jiā shàng jiā shàng 资金zī jīn zī jīn 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 的de de 规模guī mó guī mó 和hé hé 缺乏quē fá quē fá 事先shì xiān shì xiān 磋商cuō shāng cuō shāng ，， ， 解释jiě shì jiě shì 了le le 行业háng yè háng yè 反应fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 的de de 激烈jī liè jī liè 程度chéng dù chéng dù 。。 。

部分属实

6.0

/ 10

核心hé xīn hé xīn 事实shì shí shì shí 要素yào sù yào sù 是shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de ：： ： 20152015 2015 年nián nián 预算yù suàn yù suàn 中约zhōng yuē zhōng yuē 有yǒu yǒu 1.051.05 1.05 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 从cóng cóng 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 艺术yì shù yì shù 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn ，， ， 且qiě qiě 最初zuì chū zuì chū 的de de 决定jué dìng jué dìng 是shì shì 在zài zài 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 事先shì xiān shì xiān 与yǔ yǔ 艺术yì shù yì shù 行业háng yè háng yè 磋商cuō shāng cuō shāng 的de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 下xià xià 做出zuò chū zuò chū 的de de 。。 。
The core factual elements are accurate: approximately $105 million was cut from the Australia Council in the 2015 budget, and the initial decision was made without prior consultation with the arts industry.
 然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le ：： ：
However, the claim omits that: 1. $32 million was later returned to the Australia Council (November 2015) 2.
 11 1 .. . 32003200 3200 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 后来hòu lái hòu lái 返还fǎn huán fǎn huán 给gěi gěi 了le le 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 艺术yì shù yì shù 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì （（ （ 20152015 2015 年nián nián 1111 11 月yuè yuè ）） ）
The funding was redirected to a new program, not eliminated 3.
 22 2 .. . 资金zī jīn zī jīn 被bèi bèi 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 定向dìng xiàng dìng xiàng 到dào dào 一个yí gè yí gè 新xīn xīn 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 被bèi bèi 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo
The government did subsequently engage in consultation processes that led to program modifications The characterization "without consulting anyone in the arts industry" is an oversimplification - while the initial budget decision lacked prior consultation, subsequent consultation processes did occur and influenced the final outcome.
 33 3 .. . 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 随后suí hòu suí hòu 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 了le le 磋商cuō shāng cuō shāng 程序chéng xù chéng xù ，， ， 导致dǎo zhì dǎo zhì 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi
"" " 未wèi wèi 咨询zī xún zī xún 艺术yì shù yì shù 行业háng yè háng yè 任何人rèn hé rén rèn hé rén "" " 的de de 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 过于guò yú guò yú 简单化jiǎn dān huà jiǎn dān huà —— — —— — 虽然suī rán suī rán 最初zuì chū zuì chū 的de de 预算yù suàn yù suàn 决策jué cè jué cè 缺乏quē fá quē fá 事先shì xiān shì xiān 磋商cuō shāng cuō shāng ，， ， 但dàn dàn 随后suí hòu suí hòu 的de de 磋商cuō shāng cuō shāng 程序chéng xù chéng xù 确实què shí què shí 发生fā shēng fā shēng 并bìng bìng 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 了le le 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 结果jié guǒ jié guǒ 。。 。

📚 来源与引用 (8)

  1. 1
    PDF

    Budget Papers 2015-16 - Expense Measures

    Budget Gov • PDF Document
  2. 2
    Australia Council cuts six-year funding in wake of Brandis budget cuts, dance protests planned

    Australia Council cuts six-year funding in wake of Brandis budget cuts, dance protests planned

    The "significant impact" of the Australia Council's reduced budget is already being felt.

    The Sydney Morning Herald
  3. 3
    Election FactCheck: did the Coalition cut $105 million from Australia Council funding?

    Election FactCheck: did the Coalition cut $105 million from Australia Council funding?

    The Conversation

    Daily Bulletin
  4. 4
    minister.communications.gov.au

    Guidelines released for new arts fund - Catalyst

    Minister Communications Gov

  5. 5
    Impact of the 2014 and 2015 Commonwealth Budget decisions on the Arts

    Impact of the 2014 and 2015 Commonwealth Budget decisions on the Arts

    On the 16 June 2015 the following matter be referred to the Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee for inquiry and report: the impact of the 2014 and 2015 Commonwealth Budget decisions on the Arts; and  the suitability and appropriateness of the estab

    Aph Gov
  6. 6
    New Matilda - Bias and Credibility

    New Matilda - Bias and Credibility

    LEFT BIAS These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may

    Media Bias/Fact Check
  7. 7
    en.wikipedia.org

    New Matilda - Wikipedia

    Wikipedia

  8. 8
    What Labor, the Coalition and the Greens are offering the arts in the 2025 election

    What Labor, the Coalition and the Greens are offering the arts in the 2025 election

    Financial support for artists, local content quotas for streaming platforms and AI regulation are on the agenda this election.

    Abc Net

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性，但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。

Previous: C0539 Next: C0541