部分属实

评分: 6.0/10

Coalition
C0518

声明内容

“花费1440万美元为过时且不安全的软件获取支持,而非使用当前版本。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

** * ** * 属实shǔ shí shǔ shí ** * ** * -- - 14401440 1440 万美元wàn měi yuán wàn měi yuán 的de de 数字shù zì shù zì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 。。 。
**TRUE** - The $14.4 million figure is accurate.
20152015 2015 年nián nián 88 8 月yuè yuè ,, , 财政部cái zhèng bù cái zhèng bù 与yǔ yǔ 微软wēi ruǎn wēi ruǎn 签署qiān shǔ qiān shǔ 了le le 两份liǎng fèn liǎng fèn 为期wéi qī wéi qī 一年yī nián yī nián 的de de "" " 定制dìng zhì dìng zhì 支持zhī chí zhī chí "" " 合同hé tóng hé tóng ,, , 涵盖hán gài hán gài 国防guó fáng guó fáng 、、 、 人类rén lèi rén lèi 服务fú wù fú wù 、、 、 移民yí mín yí mín 与yǔ yǔ 边境biān jìng biān jìng 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 税务局shuì wù jú shuì wù jú 等děng děng 部门bù mén bù mén 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 的de de WindowsWindows Windows XPXP XP 和hé hé WindowsWindows Windows ServerServer Server 20032003 2003 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
In August 2015, the Department of Finance signed two one-year contracts with Microsoft for "custom support" covering Windows XP and Windows Server 2003 for the Departments of Defence, Human Services, Immigration and Border Protection, and the Australian Taxation Office [1].
微软wēi ruǎn wēi ruǎn 已于yǐ yú yǐ yú 20142014 2014 年nián nián 44 4 月yuè yuè 停止tíng zhǐ tíng zhǐ 对duì duì WindowsWindows Windows XPXP XP 的de de 扩展kuò zhǎn kuò zhǎn 支持zhī chí zhī chí ,, , 并于bìng yú bìng yú 20152015 2015 年nián nián 77 7 月yuè yuè 停止tíng zhǐ tíng zhǐ 对duì duì WindowsWindows Windows ServerServer Server 20032003 2003 的de de 扩展kuò zhǎn kuò zhǎn 支持zhī chí zhī chí ,, , 这zhè zhè 意味着yì wèi zhe yì wèi zhe 该gāi gāi 公司gōng sī gōng sī 将jiāng jiāng 不再bù zài bù zài 为wèi wèi 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng 提供tí gōng tí gōng 安全更新ān quán gēng xīn ān quán gēng xīn 或huò huò 漏洞补丁lòu dòng bǔ dīng lòu dòng bǔ dīng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
Microsoft had officially discontinued extended support for Windows XP in April 2014 and for Windows Server 2003 in July 2015, meaning the company would no longer provide security updates or patches for vulnerabilities [1][2].
使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng 的de de 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 面临miàn lín miàn lín 两种liǎng zhǒng liǎng zhǒng 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé :: : (( ( 11 1 )) ) 在zài zài 规划guī huà guī huà 迁移qiān yí qiān yí 的de de 同时tóng shí tóng shí 支付zhī fù zhī fù 不断bù duàn bù duàn 上涨shàng zhǎng shàng zhǎng 的de de 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ 扩展kuò zhǎn kuò zhǎn 支持zhī chí zhī chí ,, , 或huò huò (( ( 22 2 )) ) 承担chéng dān chéng dān 运行yùn xíng yùn xíng 不bù bù 受shòu shòu 支持系统zhī chí xì tǒng zhī chí xì tǒng 的de de 安全ān quán ān quán 风险fēng xiǎn fēng xiǎn 。。 。
Organizations using these systems faced two choices: (1) pay escalating fees for extended support while planning migrations, or (2) accept the security risks of running unsupported systems.
14401440 1440 万美元wàn měi yuán wàn měi yuán 这一zhè yī zhè yī 数字shù zì shù zì 当时dāng shí dāng shí 被bèi bèi iTnewsiTnews iTnews 和hé hé DelimiterDelimiter Delimiter 两家liǎng jiā liǎng jiā 科技kē jì kē jì 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 网站wǎng zhàn wǎng zhàn 报道bào dào bào dào [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The $14.4 million figure was reported by both iTnews and Delimiter technology news sites at the time [1].
这zhè zhè 是shì shì 由yóu yóu 财政部cái zhèng bù cái zhèng bù 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 多个duō gè duō gè 机构jī gòu jī gòu 协商xié shāng xié shāng 的de de "" " 全quán quán 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 统一tǒng yī tǒng yī 采购cǎi gòu cǎi gòu "" " 安排ān pái ān pái 。。 。
This was a "whole of government procurement" arrangement negotiated by the Department of Finance on behalf of multiple agencies.

缺失背景

该gāi gāi 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 信息xìn xī xìn xī :: :
The claim omits several critical pieces of context: **1.
** * ** * 11 1 .. . 这是zhè shì zhè shì 过渡性guò dù xìng guò dù xìng 安排ān pái ān pái ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 永久yǒng jiǔ yǒng jiǔ 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 。。 。
This was a transitional arrangement, not a permanent policy.** The departments were actively planning upgrades - Defence had already initiated its "Next Generation Desktop" program in 2012 (before the Coalition took office in 2013) which included upgrades to Windows 7 [1].
** * ** * 相关xiāng guān xiāng guān 部门bù mén bù mén 当时dāng shí dāng shí 正在zhèng zài zhèng zài 积极jī jí jī jí 规划guī huà guī huà 升级shēng jí shēng jí -- - 国防部guó fáng bù guó fáng bù 已于yǐ yú yǐ yú 20122012 2012 年nián nián (( ( 在zài zài 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 20132013 2013 年nián nián 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 之前zhī qián zhī qián )) ) 启动qǐ dòng qǐ dòng 了le le "" " 下一代xià yí dài xià yí dài 桌面zhuō miàn zhuō miàn "" " 计划jì huà jì huà ,, , 其中qí zhōng qí zhōng 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 升级shēng jí shēng jí 到dào dào WindowsWindows Windows 77 7 [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The extended support was purchased specifically to buy time for these planned migrations. **2.
购买gòu mǎi gòu mǎi 扩展kuò zhǎn kuò zhǎn 支持zhī chí zhī chí 正是zhèng shì zhèng shì 为了wèi le wèi le 给gěi gěi 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 计划jì huà jì huà 中zhōng zhōng 的de de 迁移qiān yí qiān yí 争取时间zhēng qǔ shí jiān zhēng qǔ shí jiān 。。 。
The alternative was significantly more expensive.** According to IBRS analyst Joe Sweeney quoted in the original article: "Upgrades cost millions - they don't cost $14 million or $28 million" [1].
** * ** * 22 2 .. . 替代tì dài tì dài 方案fāng àn fāng àn 的de de 成本chéng běn chéng běn 要yào yào 高得gāo dé gāo dé 多duō duō 。。 。
Major government IT migrations involving tens of thousands of desktops, specialized software compatibility testing, security certifications, and staff retraining can cost significantly more than the temporary extended support fees. **3.
** * ** * 据jù jù 原文yuán wén yuán wén 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 的de de IBRSIBRS IBRS 分析师fēn xī shī fēn xī shī JoeJoe Joe SweeneySweeney Sweeney 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì :: : "" " 升级shēng jí shēng jí 需要xū yào xū yào 数百万美元shù bǎi wàn měi yuán shù bǎi wàn měi yuán -- - 但dàn dàn 不会bú huì bú huì 花费huā fèi huā fèi 14001400 1400 万wàn wàn 或huò huò 28002800 2800 万美元wàn měi yuán wàn měi yuán "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
Microsoft doubled extended support fees annually.** Organizations staying on legacy systems faced escalating costs that would eventually make migration unavoidable - Microsoft reportedly doubled the annual fee for Windows Server 2003 support each year [1].
涉及shè jí shè jí 数万shù wàn shù wàn 台tái tái 桌面zhuō miàn zhuō miàn 的de de 大型dà xíng dà xíng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ ITIT IT 迁移qiān yí qiān yí 、、 、 专业zhuān yè zhuān yè 软件ruǎn jiàn ruǎn jiàn 兼容性jiān róng xìng jiān róng xìng 测试cè shì cè shì 、、 、 安全ān quán ān quán 认证rèn zhèng rèn zhèng 和hé hé 员工yuán gōng yuán gōng 再zài zài 培训péi xùn péi xùn 等děng děng 成本chéng běn chéng běn 可能kě néng kě néng 远高于yuǎn gāo yú yuǎn gāo yú 临时lín shí lín shí 扩展kuò zhǎn kuò zhǎn 支持zhī chí zhī chí 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng 。。 。
This created natural pressure to migrate. **4.
** * ** * 33 3 .. . 微软wēi ruǎn wēi ruǎn 每年měi nián měi nián 将jiāng jiāng 扩展kuò zhǎn kuò zhǎn 支持zhī chí zhī chí 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng 翻倍fān bèi fān bèi 。。 。
This was not isolated to government.** As the SMH article noted, "many organisations finding there was little business value in expensive, time-consuming upgrades, or that they simply lacked the internal expertise necessary to execute a successful, large-scale migration" [1].
** * ** * 继续jì xù jì xù 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 遗留yí liú yí liú 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng 的de de 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 面临miàn lín miàn lín 不断bù duàn bù duàn 上涨shàng zhǎng shàng zhǎng 的de de 成本chéng běn chéng běn ,, , 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 将jiāng jiāng 迫使pò shǐ pò shǐ 迁移qiān yí qiān yí 变得biàn dé biàn dé 不可避免bù kě bì miǎn bù kě bì miǎn -- - 据jù jù 报道bào dào bào dào 微软wēi ruǎn wēi ruǎn 每年měi nián měi nián 将jiāng jiāng 对duì duì WindowsWindows Windows ServerServer Server 20032003 2003 的de de 扩展kuò zhǎn kuò zhǎn 支持zhī chí zhī chí 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng 翻倍fān bèi fān bèi [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
Both private sector and government organizations worldwide faced similar challenges with Windows XP and Server 2003 end-of-life.
这zhè zhè 自然zì rán zì rán 形成xíng chéng xíng chéng 了le le 迁移qiān yí qiān yí 的de de 压力yā lì yā lì 。。 。
** * ** * 44 4 .. . 这zhè zhè 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu 现象xiàn xiàng xiàn xiàng 。。 。
** * ** * 正如zhèng rú zhèng rú 《《 《 悉尼xī ní xī ní 先驱xiān qū xiān qū 晨报chén bào chén bào 》》 》 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 所suǒ suǒ 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū 的de de ,, , "" " 许多xǔ duō xǔ duō 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn 昂贵áng guì áng guì 的de de 升级shēng jí shēng jí 耗时hào shí hào shí 费力fèi lì fèi lì 却què què 几乎jī hū jī hū 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 商业价值shāng yè jià zhí shāng yè jià zhí ,, , 或者huò zhě huò zhě 它们tā men tā men 根本gēn běn gēn běn 缺乏quē fá quē fá 执行zhí xíng zhí xíng 成功chéng gōng chéng gōng 的de de 大规模dà guī mó dà guī mó 迁移qiān yí qiān yí 所suǒ suǒ 需xū xū 的de de 内部nèi bù nèi bù 专业知识zhuān yè zhī shí zhuān yè zhī shí "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
私营部门sī yíng bù mén sī yíng bù mén 和hé hé 全球quán qiú quán qiú 各地gè dì gè dì 的de de 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 机构jī gòu jī gòu 都dōu dōu 面临miàn lín miàn lín 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de WindowsWindows Windows XPXP XP 和hé hé ServerServer Server 20032003 2003 生命周期shēng mìng zhōu qī shēng mìng zhōu qī 终止zhōng zhǐ zhōng zhǐ 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn 。。 。

来源可信度评估

原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán ** * ** * 《《 《 悉尼xī ní xī ní 先驱xiān qū xiān qū 晨报chén bào chén bào 》》 》 ** * ** * 是shì shì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 报纸bào zhǐ bào zhǐ ,, , 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 较jiào jiào 高gāo gāo 的de de factualfactual factual reportingreporting reporting 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 。。 。
The original source, the **Sydney Morning Herald**, is a mainstream Australian newspaper with generally high factual reporting standards.
根据gēn jù gēn jù MediaMedia Media BiasBias Bias // / FactFact Fact CheckCheck Check 的de de 评级píng jí píng jí ,, , SMHSMH SMH 被bèi bèi 评为píng wèi píng wèi "" " 中zhōng zhōng 左zuǒ zuǒ "" " 倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng ,, , factualfactual factual reportingreporting reporting 为wèi wèi "" " 高gāo gāo "" " [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
According to Media Bias/Fact Check, SMH is rated as "Left-Center" with "High" factual reporting [3].
该gāi gāi 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 本身běn shēn běn shēn 是shì shì 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 的de de 技术jì shù jì shù 报道bào dào bào dào ,, , 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 了le le 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 合同hé tóng hé tóng 并bìng bìng 包含bāo hán bāo hán 分析师fēn xī shī fēn xī shī 评论píng lùn píng lùn ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 或huò huò 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 性xìng xìng 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 。。 。
The article itself is straightforward technology reporting citing specific contracts and including analyst commentary, not an opinion piece or advocacy journalism.
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 标题biāo tí biāo tí 的de de 措辞cuò cí cuò cí (( ( "" " heftyhefty hefty priceprice price "" " ,, , "" " outdatedoutdated outdated "" " )) ) 营造yíng zào yíng zào 了le le 一种yī zhǒng yī zhǒng 负面fù miàn fù miàn 印象yìn xiàng yìn xiàng ,, , 未能wèi néng wèi néng 充分反映chōng fèn fǎn yìng chōng fèn fǎn yìng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ ITIT IT 运营yùn yíng yùn yíng 的de de 复杂性fù zá xìng fù zá xìng 。。 。
However, the framing of the headline ("hefty price," "outdated") creates a negative impression that doesn't fully reflect the complexity of government IT operations.
文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 确实què shí què shí 包含bāo hán bāo hán 来自lái zì lái zì 行业háng yè háng yè 分析师fēn xī shī fēn xī shī 的de de 平衡píng héng píng héng 评论píng lùn píng lùn ,, , 但dàn dàn 整体zhěng tǐ zhěng tǐ 呈现chéng xiàn chéng xiàn 暗示àn shì àn shì 浪费làng fèi làng fèi ,, , 却què què 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 充分chōng fèn chōng fèn 解释jiě shì jiě shì 各gè gè 机构jī gòu jī gòu 做出zuò chū zuò chū 这一zhè yī zhè yī 决定jué dìng jué dìng 的de de 原因yuán yīn yuán yīn 。。 。
The article does include balanced commentary from industry analysts, but the overall presentation suggests wastefulness without adequately explaining why agencies made this decision.
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 面临miàn lín miàn lín 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 遗留yí liú yí liú ITIT IT 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn ?? ?
**Did Labor governments face similar legacy IT challenges?** While specific dollar-for-dollar comparisons for extended support contracts during the Rudd/Gillard era (2007-2013) are not readily available in public sources, Australian government agencies have consistently faced legacy IT challenges regardless of which party was in power. **Key findings:** 1. **Systemic problem across all governments:** A 2024 report found that Australian government agencies spend approximately 80% of their technology budgets maintaining outdated systems - more than banking and finance sectors [4].
** * ** *
This indicates a structural challenge in government IT that predates and transcends any single government. 2. **Labor's own IT challenges:** The Department of Defence's "Next Generation Desktop" program - which the Coalition government was continuing - was initiated as a pilot in 2012 under the Gillard Labor government [1].
虽然suī rán suī rán 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 资料zī liào zī liào 中zhōng zhōng 无法wú fǎ wú fǎ 找到zhǎo dào zhǎo dào 陆克文lù kè wén lù kè wén // / 吉拉德jí lā dé jí lā dé 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 时期shí qī shí qī (( ( 20072007 2007 -- - 20132013 2013 年nián nián )) ) 扩展kuò zhǎn kuò zhǎn 支持zhī chí zhī chí 合同hé tóng hé tóng 的de de 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 金额jīn é jīn é 对比duì bǐ duì bǐ ,, , 但dàn dàn 澳大利亚政府ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ 机构jī gòu jī gòu 无论wú lùn wú lùn 哪个nǎ ge nǎ ge 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng ,, , 都dōu dōu 持续chí xù chí xù 面临miàn lín miàn lín 遗留yí liú yí liú ITIT IT 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn 。。 。
This demonstrates that the planning for upgrades began before the Coalition took office. 3. **Historical pattern:** Australian Cyber Security Centre guidance notes that "legacy information technology presents significant and enduring risks to the cyber security posture of Australian Government entities" - a problem affecting all agencies regardless of political administration [5]. 4. **Global context:** The UK government similarly paid millions for Windows XP extended support in 2014, with the National Health Service (NHS) and various government departments facing identical challenges [6].
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn :: : ** * ** *
This was a global issue affecting organizations that had built critical infrastructure on these platforms.
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 问题wèn tí wèn tí :: : ** * ** * 20242024 2024 年nián nián 的de de 一份yī fèn yī fèn 报告bào gào bào gào 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn ,, , 澳大利亚政府ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ 机构jī gòu jī gòu 约yuē yuē 80%80% 80% 的de de 技术jì shù jì shù 预算yù suàn yù suàn 用于yòng yú yòng yú 维护wéi hù wéi hù 过时guò shí guò shí 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng -- - 超过chāo guò chāo guò 银行yín háng yín háng 和hé hé 金融部门jīn róng bù mén jīn róng bù mén [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ ITIT IT 存在cún zài cún zài 结构性jié gòu xìng jié gòu xìng 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn ,, , 早于zǎo yú zǎo yú 并bìng bìng 超越chāo yuè chāo yuè 任何rèn hé rèn hé 单一dān yī dān yī 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 。。 。
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 自身zì shēn zì shēn 的de de ITIT IT 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn :: : ** * ** * 国防部guó fáng bù guó fáng bù "" " 下一代xià yí dài xià yí dài 桌面zhuō miàn zhuō miàn "" " 计划jì huà jì huà -- - 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 正在zhèng zài zhèng zài 继续jì xù jì xù 推进tuī jìn tuī jìn -- - 于yú yú 20122012 2012 年nián nián 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 试点shì diǎn shì diǎn 在zài zài 吉拉德jí lā dé jí lā dé 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 时期shí qī shí qī 启动qǐ dòng qǐ dòng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 升级shēng jí shēng jí 规划guī huà guī huà 早zǎo zǎo 在zài zài 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 上台shàng tái shàng tái 之前zhī qián zhī qián 就jiù jiù 已yǐ yǐ 开始kāi shǐ kāi shǐ 。。 。
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ 模式mó shì mó shì :: : ** * ** * 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 网络安全wǎng luò ān quán wǎng luò ān quán 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn 指南zhǐ nán zhǐ nán 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū ,, , "" " 遗留yí liú yí liú 信息技术xìn xī jì shù xìn xī jì shù 对duì duì 澳大利亚政府ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ 实体shí tǐ shí tǐ 的de de 网络安全wǎng luò ān quán wǎng luò ān quán 态势tài shì tài shì 构成gòu chéng gòu chéng 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 且qiě qiě 持久chí jiǔ chí jiǔ 的de de 风险fēng xiǎn fēng xiǎn "" " -- - 这是zhè shì zhè shì 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 机构jī gòu jī gòu 的de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí ,, , 无论wú lùn wú lùn 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 管理层guǎn lǐ céng guǎn lǐ céng 如何rú hé rú hé [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
44 4 .. . ** * ** * 全球quán qiú quán qiú 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng :: : ** * ** * 英国政府yīng guó zhèng fǔ yīng guó zhèng fǔ 同样tóng yàng tóng yàng 在zài zài 20142014 2014 年nián nián 为wèi wèi WindowsWindows Windows XPXP XP 扩展kuò zhǎn kuò zhǎn 支持zhī chí zhī chí 支付zhī fù zhī fù 了le le 数百万美元shù bǎi wàn měi yuán shù bǎi wàn měi yuán ,, , 国家guó jiā guó jiā 卫生wèi shēng wèi shēng 服务fú wù fú wù (( ( NHSNHS NHS )) ) 和hé hé 各gè gè 政府部门zhèng fǔ bù mén zhèng fǔ bù mén 面临miàn lín miàn lín 相同xiāng tóng xiāng tóng 的de de 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
这是zhè shì zhè shì 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 在zài zài 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 平台píng tái píng tái 上shàng shàng 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 基础设施jī chǔ shè shī jī chǔ shè shī 的de de 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 的de de 全球性quán qiú xìng quán qiú xìng 问题wèn tí wèn tí 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

** * ** * 完整wán zhěng wán zhěng 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng :: : ** * ** *
**The full story:** The $14.4 million expenditure, while appearing wasteful on its surface, represents a pragmatic transitional strategy for government agencies managing complex IT environments: **Legitimate rationale:** - **Risk mitigation:** Running completely unsupported systems would expose critical government infrastructure (Defence, Tax Office, Immigration, Human Services) to known security vulnerabilities with no patch pathway [2] - **Migration planning time:** Large-scale government IT migrations require years of planning, testing, security certification, and staged rollout.
14401440 1440 万美元wàn měi yuán wàn měi yuán 的de de 支出zhī chū zhī chū ,, , 虽然suī rán suī rán 表面biǎo miàn biǎo miàn 上shàng shàng 看似kàn shì kàn shì 浪费làng fèi làng fèi ,, , 但dàn dàn 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 着zhe zhe 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 机构jī gòu jī gòu 管理guǎn lǐ guǎn lǐ 复杂fù zá fù zá ITIT IT 环境huán jìng huán jìng 的de de 一种yī zhǒng yī zhǒng 务实wù shí wù shí 过渡guò dù guò dù 策略cè lüè cè lüè :: :
The extended support provided a controlled window to complete these migrations [1] - **Cost trade-off:** As the analyst noted, full migrations cost tens of millions and involve significant operational disruption.
** * ** * 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 依据yī jù yī jù :: : ** * ** *
Paying $14.4 million to avoid running unsecured systems while completing planned upgrades was arguably the least-worst option [1] **Legitimate criticisms:** - **Why weren't migrations completed earlier?** The Defence Department's upgrade program began in 2012, yet by 2015 they were still on legacy systems.
-- - ** * ** * 风险fēng xiǎn fēng xiǎn 缓解huǎn jiě huǎn jiě :: : ** * ** * 运行yùn xíng yùn xíng 完全wán quán wán quán 不bù bù 受shòu shòu 支持zhī chí zhī chí 的de de 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng 将jiāng jiāng 使shǐ shǐ 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 基础设施jī chǔ shè shī jī chǔ shè shī (( ( 国防guó fáng guó fáng 、、 、 税务局shuì wù jú shuì wù jú 、、 、 移民yí mín yí mín 、、 、 人类rén lèi rén lèi 服务fú wù fú wù )) ) 暴露bào lù bào lù 于yú yú 已知yǐ zhī yǐ zhī 安全漏洞ān quán lòu dòng ān quán lòu dòng 之下zhī xià zhī xià ,, , 且qiě qiě 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 补丁bǔ dīng bǔ dīng 修复xiū fù xiū fù 途径tú jìng tú jìng [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
This suggests planning and execution issues that predate the Coalition government. - **Fragmented agency decision-making:** The Department of Finance noted that "upgrades to server and operating systems were ultimately the decision of each department" [1].
-- - ** * ** * 迁移qiān yí qiān yí 规划guī huà guī huà 时间shí jiān shí jiān :: : ** * ** * 大规模dà guī mó dà guī mó 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ ITIT IT 迁移qiān yí qiān yí 需要xū yào xū yào 数年shù nián shù nián 的de de 规划guī huà guī huà 、、 、 测试cè shì cè shì 、、 、 安全ān quán ān quán 认证rèn zhèng rèn zhèng 和hé hé 分阶段fēn jiē duàn fēn jiē duàn 推出tuī chū tuī chū 。。 。
This suggests a lack of coordinated central IT strategy across government. **Comparative context:** This is not unique to Coalition governments.
扩展kuò zhǎn kuò zhǎn 支持zhī chí zhī chí 提供tí gōng tí gōng 了le le 一个yí gè yí gè 受控shòu kòng shòu kòng 的de de 时间shí jiān shí jiān 窗口chuāng kǒu chuāng kǒu 来lái lái 完成wán chéng wán chéng 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 迁移qiān yí qiān yí [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
Legacy IT challenges are a structural problem in Australian government that has persisted across multiple administrations.
-- - ** * ** * 成本chéng běn chéng běn 权衡quán héng quán héng :: : ** * ** * 正如zhèng rú zhèng rú 分析师fēn xī shī fēn xī shī 所suǒ suǒ 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū 的de de ,, , 全面quán miàn quán miàn 迁移qiān yí qiān yí 需要xū yào xū yào 数千万美元shù qiān wàn měi yuán shù qiān wàn měi yuán 并bìng bìng 涉及shè jí shè jí 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 运营yùn yíng yùn yíng 中断zhōng duàn zhōng duàn 。。 。
The 80% of IT budgets spent on maintaining outdated systems [4] indicates a systemic issue requiring long-term strategic reform, not simply criticism of individual procurement decisions.
支付zhī fù zhī fù 14401440 1440 万美元wàn měi yuán wàn měi yuán 以yǐ yǐ 避免bì miǎn bì miǎn 运行yùn xíng yùn xíng 不bù bù 安全ān quán ān quán 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng ,, , 同时tóng shí tóng shí 完成wán chéng wán chéng 计划jì huà jì huà 中zhōng zhōng 的de de 升级shēng jí shēng jí ,, , 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ 说shuō shuō 是shì shì 最zuì zuì 不bù bù 糟糕zāo gāo zāo gāo 的de de 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
** * ** * 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 批评pī píng pī píng :: : ** * ** *
-- - ** * ** * 为何wèi hé wèi hé 迁移qiān yí qiān yí 未能wèi néng wèi néng 更gèng gèng 早zǎo zǎo 完成wán chéng wán chéng ?? ?
** * ** * 国防部guó fáng bù guó fáng bù 的de de 升级shēng jí shēng jí 计划jì huà jì huà 于yú yú 20122012 2012 年nián nián 启动qǐ dòng qǐ dòng ,, , 但dàn dàn 到dào dào 20152015 2015 年nián nián 仍réng réng 在zài zài 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 遗留yí liú yí liú 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng 。。 。
这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 规划guī huà guī huà 和hé hé 执行zhí xíng zhí xíng 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 存在cún zài cún zài 问题wèn tí wèn tí ,, , 早zǎo zǎo 于yú yú 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 。。 。
-- - ** * ** * 机构jī gòu jī gòu 决策jué cè jué cè 碎片suì piàn suì piàn 化huà huà :: : ** * ** * 财政部cái zhèng bù cái zhèng bù 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū ,, , "" " 服务器fú wù qì fú wù qì 和hé hé 操作系统cāo zuò xì tǒng cāo zuò xì tǒng 的de de 升级shēng jí shēng jí 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 由yóu yóu 各gè gè 部门bù mén bù mén 自行决定zì xíng jué dìng zì xíng jué dìng "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 缺乏quē fá quē fá 协调xié tiáo xié tiáo 统一tǒng yī tǒng yī 的de de 中央zhōng yāng zhōng yāng ITIT IT 战略zhàn lüè zhàn lüè 。。 。
** * ** * 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng :: : ** * ** *
这zhè zhè 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu 。。 。
遗留yí liú yí liú ITIT IT 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn 是shì shì 澳大利亚政府ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ 的de de 结构性jié gòu xìng jié gòu xìng 问题wèn tí wèn tí ,, , 已yǐ yǐ 持续chí xù chí xù 多个duō gè duō gè 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 任期rèn qī rèn qī 。。 。
ITIT IT 预算yù suàn yù suàn 中zhōng zhōng 80%80% 80% 用于yòng yú yòng yú 维护wéi hù wéi hù 过时guò shí guò shí 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng ,, , 这zhè zhè 需要xū yào xū yào 长期cháng qī cháng qī 战略zhàn lüè zhàn lüè 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé ,, , 而ér ér 不仅仅bù jǐn jǐn bù jǐn jǐn 是shì shì 批评pī píng pī píng 个别gè bié gè bié 采购cǎi gòu cǎi gòu 决策jué cè jué cè 。。 。

部分属实

6.0

/ 10

核心hé xīn hé xīn 事实shì shí shì shí 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què -- - 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 在zài zài 20152015 2015 年nián nián 花费huā fèi huā fèi 了le le 14401440 1440 万美元wàn měi yuán wàn měi yuán 购买gòu mǎi gòu mǎi WindowsWindows Windows XPXP XP 和hé hé WindowsWindows Windows ServerServer Server 20032003 2003 的de de 扩展kuò zhǎn kuò zhǎn 支持zhī chí zhī chí 。。 。
The core fact is accurate - the Coalition government did spend $14.4 million on extended support for Windows XP and Windows Server 2003 in 2015.
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 其qí qí 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 暗示àn shì àn shì 的de de 浪费làng fèi làng fèi 和hé hé 疏忽shū hū shū hū 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 考虑kǎo lǜ kǎo lǜ 以下yǐ xià yǐ xià 因素yīn sù yīn sù :: :
However, the framing implies wastefulness and negligence that doesn't account for: 1.
11 1 .. . 安全ān quán ān quán 必要性bì yào xìng bì yào xìng (( ( 对于duì yú duì yú 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 机构jī gòu jī gòu 而言ér yán ér yán ,, , 运行yùn xíng yùn xíng 完全wán quán wán quán 不bù bù 受shòu shòu 支持zhī chí zhī chí 的de de 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 可行kě xíng kě xíng 选项xuǎn xiàng xuǎn xiàng )) )
The security necessity (running completely unsupported systems was not a viable option for critical agencies) 2.
22 2 .. . 支出zhī chū zhī chū 的de de 过渡guò dù guò dù 性质xìng zhì xìng zhì (( ( 各gè gè 机构jī gòu jī gòu 正在zhèng zài zhèng zài 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 迁移qiān yí qiān yí )) )
The transitional nature of the expenditure (agencies were actively migrating) 3.
33 3 .. . 成本chéng běn chéng běn 效益xiào yì xiào yì 分析fēn xī fēn xī (( ( 全面quán miàn quán miàn 迁移qiān yí qiān yí 的de de 成本chéng běn chéng běn 会高得huì gāo dé huì gāo dé 多duō duō )) )
The cost-benefit analysis (full migrations would cost significantly more) 4.
44 4 .. . 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 澳大利亚政府ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ 的de de 遗留yí liú yí liú ITIT IT 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn 的de de 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 本质běn zhì běn zhì
The systemic nature of legacy IT challenges affecting all Australian governments 5.
55 5 .. . 升级shēng jí shēng jí 规划guī huà guī huà 始于shǐ yú shǐ yú 前任qián rèn qián rèn 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 时期shí qī shí qī
The fact that upgrade planning began under the previous Labor government The claim presents the expenditure as an alternative to "using current versions" when in reality it was a transitional measure while completing planned upgrades that were already underway.
该gāi gāi 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 将jiāng jiāng 这笔zhè bǐ zhè bǐ 支出zhī chū zhī chū 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为wèi wèi "" " 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 当前dāng qián dāng qián 版本bǎn běn bǎn běn "" " 的de de 替代tì dài tì dài 方案fāng àn fāng àn ,, , 而ér ér 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 这zhè zhè 是shì shì 在zài zài 完成wán chéng wán chéng 已yǐ yǐ 在zài zài 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 中zhōng zhōng 的de de 计划jì huà jì huà 升级shēng jí shēng jí 期间qī jiān qī jiān 的de de 过渡guò dù guò dù 措施cuò shī cuò shī 。。 。

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。